clinton foundation been going?" how are they doing question what seems like they've been drying up. "how do we fix a completely corrupt government? from the inside out." you can text me anytime. tucker carlson is up next. always number one thing. i'm watters, and this is my world. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to >> jesse: dome xp 23. if you ever had kids in middle school, you know what sustained emotional drama looks like. everything is really placid up until about seventh grade, than the four horsemen of the adolescent apocalypse arrive. hormones, homework. the main symptom is wild

overstatement. no longer is anything okay or not very good, no, even the mildest inconvenience is transformed into a horrifying world and a disaster. the titanic plus y2k. 4 minutes late for school is the single worst thing of my life, ever. waking up before 9:00 a.m. is like death. a pop quiz in math class? that is the emotional equivalent of ethnic cleansing in bosnia. thankfully most kids get over middle school. those who don't tend to leave home and not come back. they become interpretive dance majors at the small liberal arts colleges or run for congress. ever wonder why america's traditional party of the unionized workingman suddenly sounds like a van full of eighth-grade girls on the way to prom on the urge dome on verge of tears? at this point, that is pretty much exactly what the

democratic party is. you really notice it in the way they speak. for democrats, there are no more small problems. no challenges minor. every speed bump is a full-blown catastrophe. every disagreement, total war. losing an election? they can even talk about it. close your eyes and try to picture the scariest threat you can imagine. the prowler at the door, the monster under the bed, an irs audit. now multiply that seen by 1 million sweat covered nightmares and you are just beginning to approach the level of terror the democrats feel when they think about giving up power. it's not just a bad outcome, it is the end of democracy. watch. >> it's the end of our democracy inside? >> i believe the election of joe biden essentially paused our dissent into the complete upending of our democracy, but we are not out of it.

>> it's the end of our democracy. >> we might see the end of democracy in the coming years. >> so you are saying it's still possible we could lose our democracy here in the united states? >> without a doubt. if americans lose faith in the honor of our elections, it is the beginning of the end of our democracy. to speak i think that could be the end of our democracy. not to be too poignant about it, but i want people to understand. >> hillary clinton said it could be and of our democracy. you should not fear? >> i do. >> i don't want to be overly alarmist, but i think we should be alarmed. this could be the end of american democracy and i never thought i be saying something like that. >> tucker: "it could be the end of american democracy." we always knew that max boot loved to kill brown people in faraway countries or send other people's kids to do it for him. we had no idea that max pruden

was in the idea of a full blown emotional breakdown. how else to explain a reaction like that? for a well-adjusted normal person, unwanted election outcomes are part of life. voters don't always do what you want them to do. it is frustrating, but that is how it works. in fact, when voters reject you you get a chance to assess your own behavior. chances are there is a reason that people didn't want you in power and you know have time to think about what that reason might be. that is a healthy process. so when you lose, it is hardly proof that the system is broken. in fact, it's usually evident that things are working exactly as intended. but people like max boot and liz cheney do not see it that way. they are too fragile to face their own unpopularity. to people like that, the prospect of rejection by voters of losing control of the country means literally, literally the end of democracy itself.

imagine feeling that way. if you really believe that your election laws meant the end of america and the beginning of a thousand years of darkness, you might have trouble keeping perspective on politics. every election would feel like climate change. and if your side of her lost an election, how do you describe a disaster after that? words would fail you, you would have only animal sounds. >> donald trump is not the president of the united states. [billing] [booing] >> tucker: no! someone you didn't vote for or won presidential election.

if you are not a democrat, it's pretty hard to imagine the pain of a moment like that. for democrats it was like being boiled alive in a giant mug of the world's hottest latte, without the phone. four years of retching agony. democrats inevitably came to the obvious conclusion. going forward no voter alive or dead, citizen or legal, should ever again be asked to show voter i.d. at the polls. it was a simple, elegant solution that no sensible person could disagree with. unfortunately not everyone is sensible. many people are like hitler, so they opposed voter fraud. democrats wasted no time in becoming hysterical about this. watch. >> tonight's lead, jim crow 2.0. >> it is the most pernicious thing -- this makes jim crow look like jim eagle. >> our remanence of jim crow --

i shouldn't even say remanence, revivals. an attempted revival. >> a jim crow kkk like caucus. >> their strategy is to effectively bring back jim crow in the south and allow republicans all across the country to implement jim crow 2.0. >> jim crowe at 2.0. this is sally and every other crow that we could imagine. >> tucker: its voter suppression. it is the new jim crow. >> tucker: that's right. a showing photo i.d. to votes --that is both jim crow and jae crowe and for that matter -- that is how immoral voter ideas but it's a stop at right, says eric michael dyson. at this point, a lot of things are the end of democracy including we are here to tell you not wearing a mask and an

elevator. yes. that is the end of democracy too says the latest bulletin. we are not accusing anyone of a stereo, we are just reporting the news, from this city democratic congresswoman. in any case, here she is explaining the latest threat to democracy. >> this has happened to me where you get on an elevator and people refuse to wear a mask and your choices are to either get off the elevator or to get on the elevator and to tell them to wear a mask. that should not be a problem in the united states congress and i really believe that our colleagues who refused to even adhere to the basic norms of stability are undermining our democracy and of course we are seeing it in an even more serious way. like the january 6 insurrection. >> tucker: of course, the other choices to seek immediate psychiatric care and behave like

an adult. that is not occur to them. because democracy is at stake. turns out you can just dry our ancient democracy by forgetting to wear your mask and an elevator. think about that for a moment, our democracy is that brittle. one act of carelessness and it could shatter into a million pieces like a priceless base. it's enough to keep you up and t night. they thought that some oaf might trip on a carpet edge and drop democracy onto a hardwood floor, literally, literally makes adam kinzinger cry. how sensitive he has. watch. >> i never expected a day to be quite as emotional for me as it has been. you talk about the impact of that day... [indistinct] democracies are not defined by

our bad days. we are defined by how we come back from bad days. >> tucker: another seventh-grade girl representing you in congress, ladies and gentlemen. mr. adam kinzinger. you've got to wonder if we would all be much better off if adam kinzinger had stuck to interpretive dance. matt walsh is the host of the "matt wells show and go. i was happy to have them join us. matt wells, thank you for coming on. the rhetorical excess like the pure hysteria of the democratic party -- i feel like i take it too seriously. there's something going on inside i think. >> i think so. i love that clip of the squad benchwarmers saying that you and democracy by not wearing a mask in an elevator which means that i have personally ended democracy multiple times bear largely because of people like her. and i kind of enjoy that. although i do sort of -- maybe i

will start -- every pet peeve like someone she was with her mouth open up the table, you are undermining democracy. another quick silver lining here, they are also always comparing things to pearl harbor and 9/11 all the time. they bump their shin on a table and it is pearl harbor and 9/11. silver lining is they still think pearl harbor and 9/11 are bad. what they are doing and is they are flailing around right now and there's a million different apocalypses. i think the reason is that for five years they had donald trump. and donald trump was hitler. donald trump is out of the picture, at least for now, and they also had covid for two years and people are board of that drama. i think now it is kind of --

it's like quantity over quality. to flood the zone kind of strategy where there are a million different apocalypses and we have no time to inspect any individual claim because they're always hitting us with a new one. >> i'm pretty sure russia is literally about to invade ukraine by the show and tell mike unless climate change ends that before it happens. how do you get out of bed in the morning, honestly? >> to be reelected come election time, that is also -- at the same time, they are the ones in charge of the government. their pitch seems to be everything is terrible, please reelect us. i think it speaks to the fact that look, this is always what they do. it is always about panic and

hysteria. it is just that these tyrants are a lot dumber than the historical average. i think we have to take that into account too. these are stupid, unimpressive people. i think that's part of the story here. >> tucker: i couldn't agree with you more. it is also the upside. if they were smart, we would be in camps. i really think that. but they are not, they are down. how does the advantage the rest of us have. matt wells, great to see you. jeff bezos is trying -- why would he do that? it's to keep people like himself and power. so now he's paid for "the washington post" using stolen information to expose anybody who gave money to abuse harassment and more. that is "the washington post." that is him. next.

♪ ♪

(girls giggling) ♪ (fun music) ♪ the comfortmat from weathertech offers support where you need it. mom's gonna love this! grandma's gonna love it! (girls giggling) comfortmat provides anti-fatigue cushioning while you're standing. and won't slip against your floors or under your feet. perfect throughout the home, or on the job. the weathertech comfortmat comes in three colors and finishes. (girls giggling) mmmm... it's so good! order your american made comfortmat at weathertech.com.

♪ ♪ >> tucker: it's fair to say

that james brown is not your average white supremacist, he's also a blm activist whose singled out by barack obama's personal foundation. he was a progressive columnist in louisville, kentucky. as such, "every time voters vote against gun safety affects the lives of our most vulnerable, they show their hearts can be as cold as the steel of the guns they praise." he wasn't very good at gun safety. on monday, quint has brown walked into the campaign office, pulled out a 9-millimeter, and a bullet grazed the candidates whatever they they fully was not heard. what is the headline here? gun safety educator fails test?

don grabber grabs gun and shoots? we could go on but we are not "the new york post." to get the picture. it's pretty clear. editors at the las vegas sun newspaper got the picture, but they decided to lie about it. in the most grotesque way. it's a las vegas it has only the most 2,000 miles from louisville. so here is the first line of the las vegas sun's editorial on the quintez brown shooting. "a terrifying incident in louisville, kentucky, this week revealed the dangers of the talk coming from the right about civil war and political violence." okay, so when barack obama's favorites blm affiliated gun activists tries to assassinate someone, you are looking to proved that conservatives are dangerous. "while there's been no indication yet that the" -- "the

shooting comes amid and rise at threats to politicians by increasingly violent rhetoric coming from extremist republicans." so it was extremist republicans, not that quintez brown is an extremist republican, but extremist republicans exist, the paper wants you to know. there are extremist republicans a foot and it's the fault of extremist republicans. so the lesson here is that you may believe news organizations are dishonest, but you are to scratching the surface. they are much more dishonest than you could even imagine. they will literally tell any lie as long as they believe it will hurt their political enemies. very much including you, so keep that in mind. justin trudeau ended democracy in canada. he declared martial law this week. the irony is he seems to be losing control of canada, thank god, and he's become a more desperate by the day.

just today, a conservative member parliament challenged trudeau and in response, trudeau accused her of standing with. >> conservative party members can stand with people who wave swastikas, with people who wave the confederate flag. >> tucker: we don't know the member of parliament he was talking to. we believe she is jewish, though. meanwhile, justin trudeau's government has been carrying out their threat to see is the bank accounts and cryptocurrency laws of anyone who criticizes justin trudeau. by the way come our state department has said nothing about this. as democracy ends and tear any rains, our closest ally in the world, joe biden state department has not said a word. because hungry is dangerous. man, they are dishonest. the government just banned 34 crypto wallets linked to the

freedom convoy. they have been harassing anyone who dared to donate to the truckers. today "the washington post" owned by the world's richest man began contacting people who donated as little as $40 to the convoy. can you imagine? that's not journalism. it's an incitement to violence among other things. then a reporter at the ottawa citizen exposed the identity of a cafe owner who dared to donate $250 to the convoy. that honor is receiving threats and she had a close her business. this afternoon, ilhan omar tweeted this "i failed to see why any journalist felt the need to report on a shop owner making such an angst significant donation then to get them harassed. it is unconscionable and journalists need to do better." ilhan omar is generally pretty loathsome, but when she says something that is true, we are going to give her credit for it. because unlike the las vegas sun, we are not liars. victor davis hanson is a senior

fellow at the hoover institution and he joins us tonight. professor, thank you so much for coming on. "the washington post" cheering on and make possible the harassment of small dollar donors to a truck driver convoy. what you make of this? >> i think they are inadvertently doing their best to make a tenement square scene where they are in the tank and the truckers are the citizen that says come on. i don't think they intended to make this a fault line or to be iconic. what is happened, talker, as the truckers have been iconic of those fault line throughout the middle of north america. and on one side, you have these people who are muscular and they braved the weather and they are out there with culvert and they are bringing her food and are building materials and our fuel and they are opposed by the same classes whose profited due to these truckers. and people like them. and yet the truckers tend to

have the pragmatic -- they are in the real-world pair they have to deal with real things. and they have greater common sense, sadly look at omicron and they say this natural -- this virus is in its descendants. it is more infectious, but it's not as lethal so people are getting herd immunity. it is time to let up. and after all, we are -- we give all these practical reasons why you should listen to them and the government has no answer and yet that they are a government of knowledge and intellect and they can't answer them for the truckers are also saying, you know, this fault line is more about us -- it's about the fundamental principle of these symmetrical application of the law. there was protest all throughout america, canada too. over 1,000 said that blm didn't have to wear a mask. and so everybody understands

that the trudeau government was for the blm and nt 4.0. and they had no rational systematic fairness that truckers are bringing that up. and ultimately, i don't think trudeau is going to win this. he has a pajama boy pro sewn up. these people who are wonderful people, practical people. eventually, trudeau is going to lose. against an entrenched bureaucratic elite and the corporation of silicon valley versus the average person has nothing other than common sense and popular support. >> that is exactly right. he's a monster and a dictator and i think all normal people are rooting against him. professor, thank you so much for that. >> thank you. >> tucker: during the break,

type in "liar.com" and see where that takes you. tell us when you find out. next, michelle took foia had one of the best jobs in all of sports media. she's an nfl sideline reporter. now she is walking away so she can speak freely. she joins us after the break. (vo) what makes my heart beat? having everything i want in the place i love. jamaica. heartbeat of the world. let's go!

>> tucker: a minute ago we suggest we go to a site "liar.com." it appears to be crashing right now. sorry. usually it would go to a wikipedia page for justin trudeau, at least it did right before a break. people are claiming that elon musk audit. anyway. michelle was a highly recognized reporter for sports, hundreds of nfl games as a sideline

reporter. you've probably seen some of her interviews over the years. here is a sampler. including from the super bowl this past sunday. >> obviously emotional. what's the immediate feeling you've got right now? >> i'm just so happy. i wanted it so bad. i dreamed of this, man. i dreamed it. it's a real, look at this. >> retired from sports. michelle, we love you. we will hear a lot more from her. >> tucker: that was sunday. this is wednesday after nearly 30 years cover in sports, michelle has decided to step away from nbc sports. she said she made the decision fully on her own, she was not forced out pure cheese doing it because she wants to be in a role where she can speak openly. if nothing, we are in favor of more than that.

we are honored to have her join us tonight to explain. first of all, congratulations on this new chapter. what an interesting decision that you made. why did you make it? >> it's been on my mind for quite a while, talker. thank you for helping me. now, and bc did not encourage this beer they did not force this. this has been on my mind. i have been waking up every day with a palpable pull at my gut that my middle ground, moderate -- i want to share with the rest of the world. so rather than banging it out on twitter or instagram every day, i thought, i've got to do something. i have benefited greatly from the american dream and i feel like for the sake of my kids and because i so love this country, i've got to start giving back.

>> that is the best possible reason. so people who watch sports know you and have for many years. he went on "the view" recently, which is a slightly different venue for you. we have a short clip and i want to ask if this had some role in your decision. here it is. >> my kids in school -- there is a big, big focus on the color of your skin. my children are now 16 and 13. it has been going on since they were in lower school. it is that there is an affinityy groups. they were inseparable. to get to a certain age, they start having what's called an affinity group which means you go for lunch and pizza with people who look like you. suddenly my son wasn't hanging out with ann anymore. why are we even teaching that the color of the skin matters? to me what matters is your character and your value. >> you live in the united states.

you know that color of skin has been matter into people -- >> can't we change it? >> we need white people to step up and do that. it's because they've been doing that since the civil war. >> no, no, know they haven't! >> tucker: that was such a moderate thing to say, such a sensible thing to say. and yet it seems like such a controversial thing. i think it was really brave that you said that. what did you think of the reaction? >> am just astonished that that we are so looking in the rearview mirror and not absorbing the progress that we made in this country and building on it. and recognizing it. i don't think that whoopi goldberg would have that rule 50 years ago. as she has that now. you and i know, we could come up with a million examples. and it breaks my heart that's my kids are being taught that skin color matters.

and to me, if you want white people to step up, i was stepping up when i addressed the school and said, why are we having his picnics for families of color? why are we separating our kids? if the world is integrated, let's continue that and have everyone find out what we all have in common, not just what we have in common with people who look like us. >> tucker: man. i bet you 20 bucks that 95% of americans agree with what you just said. but to say that when you work at nbc sports or any big media company really takes -- she must've known that you would be attacked for defending the american ideal as you did. why did you do that? >> because i don't care if i'm attacked. i really am not afraid of that. and i guess i feel like so many people now are afraid. and i'm not. listen, i know there are

repercussions for whatever i choose to say. and i've talked to mike at school about it. please don't hold this against my kids, i'm speaking for me, i'm speaking from a family, but please don't hold this against my kids. i think i speak for a lot of people, like you said, and a lot of these people, my friends, are afraid to repost things that i've posted or get into political conversations. they are, and i've said it, i'm afraid. i don't want to get in these arguments with my friends, with my balls, with my colleagues. this is the most terrifying thing in the world to me right now. that people are afraid to talk. these are words coming out of our mouth. yes, we could probably hurt people with our words, i acknowledge that. but i get to choose my reaction to everybody's words. and everybody else gets to choose their reaction to my words. they can choose to react to what i say. i'm going to choose to say what i believe and what i feel very strongly about.

i'm going to continue this. this is the direction i'm headed. >> i just love it, so much. i think personal bravery like the kind that you have displayed and are displaying now is deeply inspiring to people and comforting and really is the answer to where we are. so thank you for what you are doing. >> i hope people will join me. >> tucker: if you keep doing it, people will. thank you. >> think it. >> tucker: their signs all around that may be the current program where we make everything worse, destroy education, make the streaks dangerous, make everything ugly -- maybe citizens don't like that. even in liberal cities. here's another indication. free school board members were just ousted in a recall and san francisco. these officials focused on renaming 44 schools like abraham lincoln high school -- naming it with revolutionary names, because that's the most

important thing. the recall wasn't even close. more than 70% of voters supported bouncing these people out of office. joe biden spokeswoman was talked askedabout this today. >> i'm wondering if the white house has any reaction to that? >> should be of course -- we don't have any reaction directly to the decision by the local school board. but i would just reiterate that the residence objective has been keeping schools open from the beginning. >> tucker: so that is effective politics, right? help electing noncrazy school board members, the founder of the 70 and 76 projects, and we are happy to have him join us. ryan, thank you so much for coming on. the obvious conclusion is if this can happen in tempo disco, that's a pretty good sign. >> it is a good sign.

58 candidates, 42 of them won, including in fairy blue areas. we saw this is going to come everywhere. and the reason is that elected officials from d.c. to your local school board do not have the interest of the people, especially not of children. while the school district was shut down until august 2021, they were working on renaming schools like abraham lincoln high school. they were talking about abolishing the gifted and talented program. one of the school board members said that asians use white supremacy to get ahead and they refused to have one dad with a biracial daughter speak at an event because he "wasn't diverse enough because he was white." this is the action of school board members across the country who promote critical race theory. sadly, even though we've seen this reaction in san francisco, it's not alone. this is happening in red counties, blue counties across the country. this crazy school board activism. >> democratic voters are okay.

but they don't want you to vandalize their kids schools it turns out. i mean, why doesn't the dnc understand that? that seems pretty basic. >> david axel tweeted today, we want politicians out of schools. what he really means is we want conservative politicians out of schools. politicians have always been involved in schools for making curriculum, allocating budget, and certainly the teachers union which is involved in schools is very political. they are seeing the signs of what's happening and that is why the 70 and 76 project pack i'm doubling up. we are looking at 50 school board elections for the spring. if you want to run for school board or get involved, please visit our website. it's very important. i think we could flip 300 school board elections easily this year. >> tucker: how disingenuous. teachers unions are the single biggest contributor to democratic candidates in most states. i mean, what a liar.

such lies. congratulations on being there as the tide turns. appreciate that. thank you. >> thank you. >> tucker: at the durham investigation came out with some findings. turns out donald trump -- hillary clinton's campaign was fine on donald trump's campaign. and on donald trump as president. hillary clinton was asked about that today. did she admit it? that's called a tease. you are going to have to wait to find out. we will be right back. ♪ ♪

[bushes rustling] [door opening] ♪dramatic music♪ yes! hon! the weathertech's here. ♪ weathertech is the ultimate protection for your vehicle. laser-measured floorliners... no drill mudflaps... cargoliner... bumpstep... seat protector... and cupfone. ♪ what about my car? weathertech.

♪ ♪ >> tucker: we've got a portion of john durham's report on monday which found that hillary clinton's minions had spied on donald trump's campaign and we have that story for you. to speak of the common denominator in this john durham filing as it leads back to the 2016 hillary clinton campaign. at first, hillary clinton ignored it. now she is responding and fox are desperately trying to get a

distraction from the real ones pair the more his misdeeds are exposed, the more they lie. for those interested in reality, there is a good debunking of their latest nonsense. for that debugging, she links vanity fair. that has given us these headlines quoting "we can see collusion or republicans don't want to know if trump colluded with russia and "the kremlin asset in the donald trump campaign. "vanity fair" now says this, quoting hillary clinton did not in fact spy on trump's white house. what are they basing this conclusion? "the new york times," of course. the paper that won a pulitzer prize for covering russian collusion, kind of like winning best picture for a movie that was never made. what is interesting here is that we no special counsel durham is alleging that michael sussman, who has already been indicted for lying to the fbi, got help from a tech executive who scanned internet data from the

white house to look for derogatory information that would somehow linked trump to russia. and yet, nobody appears to be curious as to how that information ended up with the clinton campaign. and by the way, we've confirmed hillary clinton is speaking at tomorrow's new york state democratic party convention. tucker. >> tucker: the real headline is that "vanity fair" still exists. amazing. thank you. so obviously russia is our greatest threat. they are about to invade ukraine. but as they've been telling us that from washington, a real threat to has emerged. china has spent millions and millions to buy influence in this country. maybe that's why they're not telling you that. partnering with people like bill gates and of course the biden family. what are the parameters of this partnership? peter schweizer spent a year and

a half looking into it. he spent years exposing correction down that corruption. he is the author of a new book called "red-handed." we spoke to him about some of the details he's found that illustrate china's influence over our leaders. here is part of it. ♪ ♪ >> i really wanted to look at the whole question of why is the united states so unresponsive to china's threat? and i wanted to look at it from two aspects. i wanted to look at it from the china perspective, but i also wanted to look at elites in the united states. the sweetheart deals they get from beijing. what i found on the chinese side was this is a very brilliant strategy on their part. they call it a lead capture. on the theory is pretty simple. the united states is our arrival, even our enemy. instead of going head-to-head to head, why don't we pay off certain elements of the

leadership. if we could capture them with sweetheart deals, with other benefits, we can effectively lobotomized the united states by making them unresponsive to our throat. that became very clear. then on the american side, i wanted to look at notches people in washington, d.c., political families like the biden scrubbing for money all the time because they don't have a lot. i want to know, what would prompt a guy like bill gates who is worth $100 billion to go over to beijing and say the most ridiculous things about president g and the communist system. i wanted to try to explain that, and that is what i tried to do it in the book. >> tucker: i can't think of a more important topic to explore. so let's just start and the specifics. bill gates -- clearly it's not about money. you have the money. what to do you say and why do you think he said it? >> he's done a couple of things that are really shocking.

it's always hard to know what the motivation is, why somebody does something. what you see with bill gates and a lot of the people in the tech world is the sort weird admiration for what they call the efficiency of the chinese dictatorship. and i laugh because of course dictatorships are efficient because they don't have to worry about civil rights, they don't have to worry about property rights, they can do whatever they want. bill gates talks about how president xi work so hard for the chinese people. he has their best interest at heart. he says those things, but he's also done a series of things that i find frankly alarming. first of all, some of the investment decisions he's made. he's personally invested in chinese companies that are advancing and enhancing the chinese military. he invested in a company called v called bu i.d. along with warren buffett, by the way. in addition to doing other things, he's involved in creating advanced guided systems

for chinese missiles. bill gates would have to know that. it is not that hard to find if you investigate -- >> tucker: what sort of investment? ten grand? >> tens of millions of dollars. he was also involved with a chinese company to build reactors -- they have application on ships, submarine, and he invested heavily in that, provided technical expertise. that was ultimately blocked by the trump administration. >> tucker: you almost never hear real reporting anymore. that whole conversation is worth seeing. it's on fox nation. read it at tuckercarlson capsoff.com. and we'll be right back.

>> tucker: sadness, we are out of time. we will be back. in the meantime, great reporting from peter schweizer nair, an amazing conversation on fox nation right now. we will be back every night

including tomorrow at 8:00 p.m. the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, and group think. go america. and god bless canada, they need it. here is sean hannity. >> sean: welcome to "hannity." in scariness from the biden administration, the covid in yearly vaccine mandates with new shots in perpetuity, at least that's what one fda executive said in a new bombshell undercover video from project veritas. take a look. >> you have to get an annual shot. that hasn't been formally announced yet. >> is it going to be formally announced? >> yes, at some point. some of it to has been talked about publicly, but it has been talked about on cnn, fox, msnbc or anything. >> sean: so