that you laid out an agenda, positive agenda to save the country like you did in '94, it will be '94, 2010 and maybe even bigger. mr. speaker, thanks for being with us. unfortunately that's all the time we have left. please set your dvr never miss an episode. s that for making this possible. let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham next. >> laura: i'm laura ingraham this is the ingraham angle from an hysterical washington tonight thanks for joining us. we have more on jd vance's big ohio win a little bit later in the show and other races that went the america first way. but first, the anti democrats, that's the focus of tonight's angle. court draft opinion leak, the pro abortion frenzy outside the court last night was almost instantaneous. [chanting]

>> laura: i think they need elementary courses in rhyming. they need to update the chant. of course, like clock work the usual suspects were all over tv today. and it was the end of democracy, as we know it. >> this is very dangerous because we live in a democracy, and, what's left of it, and we need to sound the alarm because they're coming after women today. they're coming after you tomorrow. our rights are at risk, and democracy is at stake. >> laura: as usual barbara lee makes no sense. in fact if row is overturned the democratic process is working just as it should. but it was biden the supposedly

serious catholic who looked the most foolish on this issue. from his off the cuff comments it's clear he slept cat a kiss pal. >> roe says what all main extreme religions have concluded that the existence of human life and being is a question. is it at the moment of conception? is it six months? is it six weeks? the idea that we're going to make a judgment that is going to say that no one can make the judgment to abort a child based on a decision by the score i think goes way overboard. >> laura: abort a child. at least he admitted what was really happening, the killing of a child. i know the left lovers confusing people, but let's be clear about this. overturning roe, i'll say it

slowly for you, does not mean abortion is outlawed in all 50 states although that's what the pro life community are hoping and praying for, sure. overturning roe simply means, again i'll go slowly, that voters in each state will have a say in how abortion would be regulated, if at all. now roe took that decision away from the voters by making this serious argument that abortion itself was a fundamental right protected in the 14th amendment. and i have a question tonight. why are pro abortion forces so upset? because if abortion is as popular as they claim, why are they worried about what happens next? because if abortion is, indeed, popular, democrats should be thrilled to test that theory out in all 50 states. but i'll tell you what's really going on. they do not trust the people. because if the voters choose something, or someone, that the left doesn't like, they'll say,

the system is broken. they try to rig the system then so that conservatives never win again. hence their incessant talk about court packing you heard the chant and ending the filibuster, et cetera. so if they win, america still has a functioning democracy. if they lose it's all illegitimate and a sign democracy is on the ropes. >> if republicans win the midterm elections voting in this country will be gone. >> democracy's at risk. if the house takes back -- is taken back by the republicans, our democracy will be stepped on again. >> laura: yep. the ironic thing is the so-called progressives, they're the ones that have been tearing down our democratic institutions, trashing our norms, all of our procedures, literally ripping down our historical status and monuments, no votes there. they've been doing this for years now. they allege that our systems of commerce, government, business.

of course now the court, structurally racist. they say our framers were racist. and now they want to prevent certain gop candidates even who they don't like, and certainly don't think reich someone they'll tolerate like mitt romney, they want to prohibit them from running for office at all. they believe free speech on social media is dangerous and that fox news should be outlawed. their ideal government, they speak proceed democracy, their ideal government produces places like new york city and chicago. americans have begun, though, to figure it all out haven't they, what's become of these modern democrats. they don't want an independent media just like they don't want an independent judiciary and they don't want the states to be self-governing or to set priorities on issues that are important to those states. today's democrats prefer that a small homo genius group of

elites order the rest of us around. my friends, that is not democracy. no serious person thought that the framers wrote the 14th amendment to just validate whatever would be in the new york times editorial board, what they happen to believe on a given day. that's not why they wrote the 14th amendment. the rights safeguarded by the con constitution are the rights and briefings that everybody for two hundred you know years. freedom of speech, religion and assembly. by the way all rights which democrats were happy to suspend during covid, no problem there. the constitution isn't a piece of silly putty. didn't you love silly putty as a kid? for them to push any twisted priority on their agenda. what's next? a constitutional right for student loan forgiveness, for reparations? these supposed pro democracy liberals really want the most i

will liberal government of all, ruled by the robe. and things are so bad, our vice-president doesn't even seem to know what the definition of freedom is. >> if the court overturns roe v wade, it will be a direct assault on freedom. on the fundamental right of self-determination, to which all americans are entitled. >> laura: now, someone needs to remind the vice-president, when the framers described the three branches of government, they didn't mean the new york times, the harvard law review and cnn. it's not the score's job to make policy. real civics classes actually teach this. it's all rudimentary. it's the kind of stuff we learned, most of us, in the 8th grade. things like what's the role in the house and senate, legislative role, the executive branch, you enforce the law, the federal courts. you interpret the law.

the rule of law is upheld by the courts. i don't know, maybe the liberals at this point should just re-watch the old schoolhouse rock videos if they're having trouble understanding all of this at this point. for about a half of the country, roe v wade is not just a moral evil. aside from that it's a political catastrophe because it was really at the root of all the culture wars of the past 50 years. the abortion issue should have never been decided by unelected judges and it will be properly decided going forward by the people of all 50 states. every republican presidential candidate since reagan ran on a pro life agenda. >> unless someone can establish that the unborn child is not a living human being, then that child is already protected by the constitution. >> i'm going to stand on my conscious and let my conscious be my guide when it comes to matters of life.

>> every child born and unborn ought to be protected by law and welcomed to life. >> every child brings joy to a family. every person is worth protecting. >> laura: but now democrats are claiming to be shocked, shocked i say after 50 years of trying, that these republicans with the help of the pro life community and judges that actually follow the constitution that they found success? that's somehow shocking to the democrats? now maybe the media should have covered the march for life maybe fairly once. it was the longest running march in us history, it still is. maybe the meade wa should have actually talked to the young people who attended. >> i believe that from the moment of conception there's a baby there and i think everyone deserves the right to live a life. >> i think that everyone should have the right to live and i don't think that anyone else should make that decision for someone else. >> as i walk today as a woman, i will protect women's rights and be pro life for those daughters that do not get to be born.

>> laura: they were and are part of the democratic process. people having their voices heard, just like the pro abortion crowds that gathered at the court last night and continue to tonight. but the world of democrats and pro abortion activists have created is one of unending misery. where the vulnerable women and my north -- excuse me. are preyed upon by the people who lie. i'm going to go to molly because i've lost my voice. molly take it away. >> it is so interesting to hear people talk about this not being a democratic issue if roe v wade is overturned as this draft opinion from alito suggests when this that is precisely what this draft opinion shows that would be returning to the american people the chance to weigh in on abortion law instead of what has happened for the last 50 years where the supreme court made it where people could not weigh in,

even though it was a deply important cultural, moral, legal issue. so it's actually quite, if this draft opinion from justice alito is anything like what the eventual ruling will be like, this is, this is exactly what should happen in terms of having the people be able to decide what should happen in their state. so when people on the left talk about things being anti democratic or about things being an attack on democracy or a threat to democracy, it's interesting how many times what that really seems to mean is that it's a threat to liberal power or liberal control over institutions and that is what seems to be more and more >> laura: think about this. excuse me, i don't think i ever lost my voice. megan is a former clerk to alito and partner with cooper kirk law

firm also with us. megan i want to play this for you. listen. >> hard to deny that the court is political, that people don't tell the truth at their confirmation hearings. they don't tell how they really feel. this has kind of opened the pandora's box on the question of what the court is really like. are these people really a bunch of politicians in robes? >> laura: megan those justices are politicians in robes? >> absolutely not. i would suggest to any of your viewers, just read justice alito's opinion it is a tour deforce, well reasoned, well researched, exhaustive in what it covers and it's open to everyone. this is our transparent judiciary who write down the reason for their decision. the thing that the left doesn't like about it is the outcome. they've told us for years that democracy dies in darkness is what they really mean is they play by the rules as long as they're winning and as soon as

they're losing they're ready to burn it down. >> laura: molly you heard some of the commentary today on another cable network, a host claimed that this could be a conservative justice. i didn't understand that logic at all who leaked the ultimate draft opinion but they were really grasping at straws in order to turn this into midterm momentum for them. >> at this point we do not know where the leak came from but we do know there has been a pattern of attacks on the supreme court going back quite some time. we saw it during the kavanaugh confirmation where there were attempts to disrupt the constitutional proceedings of a confirmation of a supreme court justice. when justice kavanaugh was confirmed, there were people who attacked the supreme court, tried to tear down those 13 doors at the front of the court scaling the walls. you had people attacking the cars of all the justices including ruth bader ginsburg and justice kagan. so there's a pattern of

threatening to attack the court if things don't go the way democratic senators want threats to do any number of things so it's part of a pattern that you've seen on the left which you don't see on the right and i think that's why many people assume this is yet another attempt to bully justices away from this description. >> laura: now megan, former us attorney for the southern district of new york went on this rant today. >> not too great a stretch to say there's some connection between an effort to overturn an election and an effort to overturn roe and it's this as i've been thinking about it. there is a a spectrum of the ideological spectrum who thinks it has certain kinds of powers and want to engage in radical efforts to overturn things that they don't like. there's no more incrementalism, no more compromised. you don't like the results of an election you storm the capitol and talk about hanging the vice-president of the united states and you get the presidency back. >> laura: so megan, now confirmed life tenured score

justices are insurrectionists according to a former u.s. attorney. >> i mean, it's patently absurd. the legal decision is, as i mentioned, well reasoned and exhaustive. roe at the time it was decided invented a right nowhere in the constitution and justice alito lays that out. what the court did was take away a question from the people. there is a group of justices on the supreme court today, a majority of justices who want to return the question of who decides where the limits are on abortion to the american people. it's fundamentally democratic. it's the furthest thing from an insurrection and to call it an insurrection is absolutely insane. >> laura: molly do you think this changes the ultimate approach of the court as the years go on and how they're going to deliberate on cases and involve clerks in the process? >> i think in this particular instance the leak will back fire

in that it will just shore up the justices and make sure they do not deviate more than they want to but going forward it is a threat to the court and a huge problem. >> laura: molly thank you for rescuing me from my coughing fit i appreciate it. and joining me is texas senator ted cruz who sits on the judiciary committee great to see you tonight. your colleague amy club chore tweeted healthcare decisions should be made between a woman and doctor not ted cruz. not sure why she singled you out but your response? >> the part sane democrats are filled with fury and rage because they want unlimited abortion on demand up until the moment of birth with taxpayer funding with no parental consent and no parental notification and the view of just about every senate democrat is precisely that extreme. now, just 6% of americans

support unlimited abortion up until the moment of birth. that is the view of virtually every single senate democrat. they are radical and extreme. and so they know that they're not likely to win elections by embracing that radical extreme agenda so their approach is they want five unelected lawyers wearing black robes to dictate that rule for everyone else, and the irony as you were playing the opening clip of everyone talking about democracy, democrats don't believe about democracy. they don't care what they view as we the stupid sheep who need to be governed by our intellectual betters. they don't care what the voters think. they don't care that the voters in the state of texas are proud that we're protecting innocent life and unborn children. they don't care. and so they're angry. and i've got to say, this leak at the court is the most

egregious brief of trust in a court and the culmination of a multi year campaign by senate democrats to de-legitimize and politicize the court. and i think that it will do lasting damage to the integrity of the court but also to the independence of the judiciary. i think it is unbelievably stunning to have a draft opinion leak before the court issues its final decision. >> laura: all the former clerks we know we've all been talking senator i know you have as well. we're all -- it was so -- it was upsetting just because of the institution of the court. it was deeply, deeply upsetting -- when we are he a saying that not to avoid the substance of the decision, if it's the actual decision looks like it is a version of it, it was extremely well argued and well written. but the court will never be the same again, i don't think so, not in our lifetime as a result of this. but elizabeth warren, another

colleague of yours, took all this pretty well. let's watch. >> i am angry because an extremist united states score thinks that they can impose their extremist views on all of the women of this country, and they are wrong. >> laura: i think she has no future in hip-hop, but she's angry. and her argument is going to be the incremental one that once they take roe, they're going to take contraception and interracial marriage and they go down the line but that was anticipated in this draft opinion, was it not? >> it was, and it's also ludicrous. when it comes to contraception i don't know of any person in the united states of america that wants to ban contraception. it's literally a made up threat. but, laura, it's also a tell. when democrats talk about contraception instead of abortion, what they're admitting

is that they know their views on abortion are so radical and extreme that they don't resonate with the voters. and so they make up this fictional you and i are both very conservative but neither one of us is remotely interested in-laws making contraception illegal. the democrats know that but they're creating straw men. you know, you look at how extreme they are. take a look at ralph northam the former governor of virginia just until a year ago he was governor of virginia. he is also a physician. he did a radio interview where he argued not just for abortion up until the moment of birth but horrifyingly he argued for post birth abortion, which is just flat-out murder in any language. he described how he would deliver a child, he would comfort the child, the child would be breathing, crying, outside the womb and then he would have a conversation with the parent about what to do with that child. in other words, whether or not

to kill the infant he had just delivered. that is truly horrifying stuff, and it's where today's democratic party is. >> laura: senator, great to see you tonight. thank you >> and, remember, if you can't watch us live make sure to set up record on your dvr so you get do watch me cough anytimes you want week nights 10:00 p.m. chief justice roberts says the marshall at the score supreme court will be conducting an internal investigation of this draft but what about other investigations. form lea deputy county sal wise better and chris wecker have some interesting insights on this. stay there. this is roundup weed and grass killer with sure shot wand. this stuff works. this stuff works down to the root so weeds don't come back. this stuff works without hurting your back. this stuff works guaranteed, or your money back. this is roundup weed & grass killer with sure shot wand. this stuff works.

♪ >> laura: all right, the most egregious and shameful leak in the history of the court has led to an obvious question, which agency's actual going to get to the bottom of it. while chief justice john roberts said the chief marshal will investigate some suggested perhaps the involvement of the doj or fbi but conveniently democrats not on board. >> interesting question of power, why agents from the

executive branch should be running around the score interviewing clerks and staff and justices themselves if it's not appropriate for congress to exercise its legislative powers with regard to those standards. >> laura: okay. now it's ironic that senator white house, one of the loudest voices advocating the fbi look into every ridiculous brett kavanaugh accusation is suddenly saying no, that's not appropriate. no fbi involvement in the court now. here now is sal weisenberg former counsel fox news contributor and chris weckeer former of the fbi. chris i'll start with you. why might the fbi have jurisdiction here? >> laura there's at least two federal laws i think may have been violated one is 18 ufc 18 41 which is theft which includes records, and these are records

in the supreme court intra net system. second is 18 usy 1905 which prohibits confidential information confidentsal in that it was prohibited for discloser by the agency. so i think that's squarely on point here. so the fbi would have jurisdiction or the justice department would have jurisdiction should they choose to exercise it the separation of powers thing is a different legal question that saul may be able to address but i think there is jurisdiction here when i see the marshall of the court appointed to conduct the investigation that's like andy of may bury assigned to investigate water gate. that won't happen. they'll never find out who did this. >> laura: saul folks from the department are great people and i'm sure they do their very best, but there's a big push in the january 6th case about individuals who would obstruct an official proceeding of the u.s. government, and there was

great concern about obstructing the process. could this leak be interpreted to be the attempt to obstruct the process, the deliberatetive action of the court or is this too much of a reach here? >> i think it's too much of a reach. and i even think, although i agree with chris, that the two statutes he referenced, usc 1641 and 1905 are enough to get the fbi in the door and provide jurisdiction to look into it, they're not by any means, even if they find out who did the leak, they're not by any means a slam dunk. there are a lot of questions involved as to whether or not this would be a thing of value. certainly enough to get started. i think the chief wants to start in house and he wants to start, you know, in a measured kind of way. and i don't think there's a separation of powers legal issue here but he may decide to see if he can contain the

investigation, you know, within the court family. it may be true that this isn't the best entity to -- the supreme court of the united states police may not be the best entity to conduct the investigation. you know, i wouldn't necessarily compare them to andy and barney as a citizen of north carolina that oh fends offends me but we'll let that pass but keep in mind the supreme court, the police, supreme court of the united states police i believe that is an independent agency of the government. and the real issue here is, if they conduct an investigation, did the person or persons who did this, are they going to lie? if they lie during an investigation. >> laura: right, different matter. >> then clearly, clearly a crime under 18 ussdmroochlt this is what the washington post reported today, would doj charge someone for leaking scotus

performing draft almost no legal added a criminal probe my stretch justice authority here but chris once again let's assume at some point there is a federal question that arises, okay? in that case, how would the person be discovered? how do you determine if someone leaked? if i were the chiefed i would line up all the clerks and say we think one of you did this. i'm going to give you like 24 hours to tell me who did it. i don't know if you fire everybody or -- i don't know how you do this but technically with the phones, with the signal and what's app, how do you do it? >> i think it's a heavy digital forensics investigation. they work on an intra net system, which is an air locked system, as i understand it. you can't go outside this intra net system. so i think it's an very complex

forensic investigation to see who downloaded the investigation, who may have transmitted the information else -- you know, or, i'm sorry, printed the information. they can't transmit it out of the intra net system. there are a lot of different ways. who might have transferred it to an external drive, for example, as well. all of these things have digital memories. all of these things, what they would have to do is have everyone turn in their laptops or at least have their laptops forensically compeed, their mobile devices for ebbsically compeed anything that could access that intra net system for whenceically exploited, if you will. >> laura: right. so saul if you're the chief justice, or frankly all the justice. i was hoping that all nine justices signed a letter together and all said today how they condemn this, how it's important that the leaker actually be discovered, and

terminated, relationship with the court and ultimately the decision would be someone else's but i was disappointed that didn't happen. the chief speaks for the court but this affects every single one of these justices. every single one is affected by this leak. and if it was a law clerk, they must discover who that is and that individual must never be able to practice law again, at the very least. >> well, i agree. and, by the way, i don't care if it turns out that it was a conservative clerk. >> laura: absolutely. >> or a conservative staff member. it's just unacceptable. and it's particularly disturbing, and i didn't even realize it until i was listening to your podcast earlier, it's particularly disturbing to me that the demonstration -- it appears to have been coordinated with people who are ready to go and demonstrate with signs that look like they were fairly sophisticatedly created. in other words, it appears to

have been something that involved some kind of planning, maybe with the intent to affect the midterm elections. so that's extremely, extremely disturbing. and, look, i agree with chris. there's no one who can do the job i don't think in terms of the forensics as well as the fbi. i just think the chief is going to try to contain it before he brings in the fbi, it looks like, as just a credential matter and it may be that the person realizes they're going to figure out who did it and maybe that person admits it. and he or she may not have much of a legal career but they'll have a career going on to msnbc the next ten or 15 years. >> laura: they'll get a visiting lecturer position at any of the top law schools today i think. >> the john dean chair. >> laura: exactly saul you took the words out of my mouth. chris and saul great to see both of you today. here's a clue tonight's which

end segment, which recent border jumper has left behind a trail of frustration and fear and now alluding authorities in multiple jurisdictions. so reply with your guesses, just go to twitter and reply at ingraham angle and i'll reveal who's right at the end of the show. but first just moments ago jd vance the trump endorsed republican from the ohio senate was declared the winner of the primary, kelly and conway and tom biven are here in moments on what it all means. by targeting all the cells in your body? try tru niagen. life as we know it cannot exist without nad. as we age, nad can decrease by as much as 50%. tru niagen is proven to increase nad, to support heart and muscle health, and energy production that starts in your cells. address one of the root causes of aging with tru niagen, researched by the world's top scientific institutions.

♪ >> laura: now with primary day in indiana and ohio but all eyes are really on one big race in ohio. the republican senate primary that could go a long way toward deciding what the future of the republican party looks like. joining me now with reaction is kelly ann conway former senior counselor to president trump and author of here's the deal, and tom bevin co-founder and president of real politics.

kelly ann, of president trump's 14 endorsements in ohio, and he went quite the distance on, you know, endorsing people down at the state level, but 13 of the 14 have won. and the last one is expected to win as well. so this is just a huge night for america first. >> it is. and it means ohio is still trump country even though some people pretend it's not. obviously he's gone to visit the state a few times. there's no big victory in ohio tonight max miller former white house aide and campaign official won in ohio seventh congressional district. he was the first trump endorsed candidate of the cycle and effectively pushed out from congress, anthony gone seoul one of the 10 to impeach president trump. the trump bump, jd vance was 11 or 12% he went inand won tonight

decisively. couple opponents have endorsed him already and i think the president ran the table in ohio because ohio state inflation immigration security what's going on in ukraine, gas pump grocery store, everything perplexing them they fear is at the hands of people like tim ryan the democratic nominee now against jd vance a total phoney really a mini joe biden, been in washington 20 years, remarkable, already lost one race for president, sound familiar? joe biden? against energy independence all of that. and voted for build back better. so i think now republicans need to make sure that people like tim ryan get deceited in the fall to keep that important seat in republicans hands. huge night for america first leader donald trump. >> laura: here's senate candidate tim ryan speaking of this trying to distance himself, tom, from his own party. >> defunding the police is way off the mark. we need more cops not less. my party also got it wrong on

the trade deals that sent your jobs overseas. i've always fought those working against you. you want culture wars i'm not your guy. you want a fighter for ohio, i'm all in. >> laura: oh, he hit that dart. that's exciting. he actually voted with biden a hundred percent of the time in congress. so ohio voters, i think we got that point, ohio voters going to see through this tom? >> probably. listen ohio just a few seconds ago ohio was the quinn see essential pelt way 50/50 state. that's no longer the case, it's a red state, trump has transformed ohio into a solidly conservative republican territory and i think, you know, tim ryan is showing exactly what an uphill battle he is fighting heading into november given where the political landscape stands with inflation with biden's job approval and congressional -- you can go down the list he's fighting a very

uphill battle against jd vance in november knowledges. >> laura: funny moment on morning joe where they had a theory about where this might be going in ohio. watch. >> here you have donald trump starting to flitch. >> hedge his bet. >> you have donald trump starting to hedge his bets. it's donald trump knowing that he's lost a lot of juice in the republican party because this race right now is much closer than it would have been say two years ago if he endorsed somebody. >> laura: kelly ann we need a good comedic interlude here. your reeks there was he hedging his bet or losing his juice. >> he's working to be 14 for 14 like you said, it's call unanimous not anonymous everyone. look, it's very important to note that try as they did the main stream media lot of democrats were elevating the guy matt dolan who president trump endorsed when he got not the race. he owns the former indians now

the guardians and if you look the last week or two, people have been doing these profiles of him putting them on their networks, this guy's really surging, the one non-trump ring kisser wins and of course he didn't win. but the people on tv are never really held to account of what they get wrong. >> laura: we just dfrjts never are ever under oath. yeah and thank you for doing that. but try as they made they're all obsessed with donald trump. i can't understand how harsh wanted to get rid of him can't quit on him but one more thing. >> laura: real quick. >> campaigns matter, tom bevin knows this as well. so trump comes in and helps you but he can't carry you on his back the whole way. you also have to run a very good campaign. >> laura: kelly ann, tom, great to see you both >> and the democrats want you to think as roe v wade as a political matter but what does it mean to be a survivor? we talked to one in moments.

one of my favorite supplements is qunol turmeric. turmeric helps with healthy joints and inflammation support. unlike regular turmeric supplements qunol's superior absorption helps me get the full benefits of turmeric. the brand i trust is qunol.

(heartbeats) introducing icy hot pro. with 2 max-strength pain relievers. ice works fast... to freeze your pain and your doubt. heat makes it last. so you'll never sit this one out. new icy hot pro with pro-level contrast therapy. rise from pain.

♪ >> laura: now the left likes to describe the pro life movement as being run by a bunch of white men making decisions for women but the truth is that the energy of the movement is strongest among women, including minority women. >> even to this day, it's a very

hard word to say but my mother was raped. given her young age, at 11 years old, my father being 21. >> my mother said, you know, you're pregnant so we're going to get through this and she helped me get through it. >> i don't want to use the word choice. she was going to be born. >> as a child, i knew no different. i was loved, and i felt loved. >> laura: that woman you just heard is kathy barnette. she's running for senate in pennsylvania as a republican with the primary just two weeks away. kathy, it's so great to see you tonight. you're a strong pro life conservative and you hear comment taters the last couple days especially saying that overturning roe would hurt minority women most. you say? >> yeah. you know, my heart hurt when you say that because as you and i know, and so many others know, that the number one users of

abortion are young black women. for every 1,000 black babies that are born, 457 of them are murdered in their mother's womb. that's a 32% kill rate and you don't see that for any other group of people. after the 32% it drops down to the next group of people at five percent. and that's a fact. and i'm so very grateful you're evening framing it, before you went into the previous break, that is not -- generally when you hear people talk about the lives of -- or the topic of abortion, they always frame it as this, they're not talking about another human life. but my life has value. here i am. my mother conceived me when she was 11 years old. my father was 21. and, yes, adults in the room, my mother was too young. i never glorified how i was conceived. and, yes, i was there and i had absolutely nothing to do with how i was conceived.

and i'm so very grateful for the adults who were in the room who looked at what was growing in my mother and saw value. >> laura: and what does your mom say today when she sees everything happening, especially as it surrounds this current case, this mississippi abortion case? >> yeah, well, you know, my mother is very proud of me and, you know, i often think about that. i was just talking about it a little bit earlier today that, you know, the wrong that was inflicted upon my mom, that wrong would have been inflicted upon my mother whether i was murdered in her womb or not. and now i get to be a net for my mother. and she's very proud, because not only is her daughter running a very competitive race as u.s. senator, a u.s. senate candidate in pennsylvania, but i am tied for first place and all of that would have been e rad indicated had my family thought that i was

just a lump of cells and did not see any value in me. >> laura: i just like how you say, and others, that even the smallest life matters. >> yeah. >> laura: life is just life. >> i mean, think about it. like we neutralize it and we sterile eyes the conversation some of the most innocent people in our nation we sterile eyes about the conversation that it was just about the women. >> laura: no. kathy thank you for your story and testimony, we really appreciate it. we'll be following the race. ar our whit's end segment did you guess? go to twitter you'll see some of the others. i feel kinder, when nature is so kind to me. find more ways to grow with miracle-gro. during world war two, most of

the world turned a blind eye to the holocaust and hitler's atrocities. christians were slow to act and did not speak up until it was too late and 6 million jews were murdered. right now, thousands of ukrainian jewish families are fleeing the russian army for the freedom of israel. imagine fleeing with a baby in one hand and a toddler holding the other with all of your earthly possessions in a sack over your shoulder, leaving your husband behind to defend your country. these courageous families need our help. the time for action is now. we do not know when the borders will be closed. silence in the face of evil is evil. god will not hold us

guiltless. take action today. donate at jhm.org/help or call 1-855-694-9654. god bless you and >> all right, which recent

border jumper has left a trail? patton says yosemite sam. no, not quite. and they say that it is the pardoned thanks giving turkey. a big reveal. a turkey has been terrorizing, and it is apparently across state boundaries, five agencies from as many jurisdictions. we have "gutfeld!" coming up next. thank you for watching "the ingraham angle." ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ greg: look at that, yeah. happy tuesday, everyone. well, that was a big night last night, right? well, i am