terry, "why doesn't anybody say you're welcome anymore." that's true. manners have gone out the window. and it's not my fault. i will be making manners great again, because you know i'm all about pop and circumstance. they are getting sick of me, some what you guys go. talker is up next. and always remember, i'm jesse watters, and this is my world. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> tucker: good evening and welcome to tucker carlson tonight. there was a horrifying amount of violence in the united states over the weekend, as increasingly there is. over just two days at least 104 americans were shot to death and major america cities, that is a lot. for perspective, on the single deadliest day of the iraq war in january of 2005, a total of 37 americans died. what is happening in our cities right now looks a lot like a

war, even if we rarely acknowledge it. dallas, milwaukee, philadelphia, many other metro areas. in st. louis, 15 people were shot. in chicago, 33 work on downed, five of those died. in laguna woods california, chinese immigrants from las vegas walked into a presbyterian church and shut six elderly taiwanese parishioners. and of course, most famously of all, on saturday afternoon, a teenager and a mock military uniform walked into a grocery store and buffalo and shot more than a dozen strangers with a rifle. what you probably haven't seen our details about any of the ten americans who were murdered in that store and buffalo pretty you may not even know their names. most of them were black, you know that. be on the way they looked, not a lot has been reported about them. because the coverage hasn't been about them. nor in fact hasn't really been

about the gunman, the 18-year-old called peyton gendron. he was mentally ill, everyone around knew that. less than a year ago, he was committed to a mental hospital after threatening to murder his classmates at a school graduation ceremony. on saturday, he left a 180 page letter that he said would explain his motives. you've probably heard this document described as a racist manifesto. that is not quite right. it is definitely racist, bitterly so. he reduces people to their skin color, that is the essence of her racism and it's immoral. what he wrote does not add up to a manifesto. it is not a blueprint for new political movement. anyone who claims that it is is in line or hasn't it. instead, his letter is a rapidly blessed each of slogans and internet memes, some of which

flatly contradict one another. the document is not recognizably left-wing or right-wing. it's not political at all. the document is crazy. it's the product of a diseased and organized mind. part of some global conspiracy against him. disjointed, irrational, paranoid. that is true, not that it makes the atrocities he committed easier to bear. he wouldn't care where the killer did it or we did it for. the truth about peyton gendron does tell you a lot about the ruthlessness and dishonesty of our political leadership. within minutes of saturday shooting before eloped bodies had even been identified by the loved ones, they began a coordie campaign to blame it on their political opponent. they did it, they said immediately. peyton gendron was the heir to donald trump, they told us.

and for that reason, it follows logically, we must suspend the first amendment. that's hardly an exaggeration of what they are saying. here's a selection from yesterday's sunday shows. >> social media companies and law enforcement have not done enough to monitor, to ban, to restrict, and to limit hate speech on their sites. hate speech is not freedom of speech. >> as you know, the first amendment does not protect hate speech. speak i will protect the first moment any day of the week, but you don't protect hate speech. you don't protect incendiary speech. you are not allowed to scream fire in a crowded theater. there are limitations on speech. >> tucker: what is hate speech? speech that our leaders hate. because of mentally ill teenager murdered strangers, you cannot be allowed to express your political views out loud. that is what they are telling

you, that is what they wanted to tell you for a long time, but saturday's massacre gives the pretax and justification. you have to ask yourself, who behaves like that? what sort of person uses mass murder as an excuse to give a campaign speech or sees more political power? we will find out tomorrow when joe biden traveled to the scene of this atrocity and buffalo to speak to the country. even seen an advance copy of his remarks, but you can guess. it appears to be the lowest ever, lower than donald trump's prayer that is a disaster for his party. they will suffer for this in the election. biden still is time to change course and fix it. he could try to improve the lives of voters who are dissatisfied with them. that is what politicians typically do and they are down. they listen to the people who might reelect them. biden doesn't plan to do that, and we know for a fact because politico has reported it.

biden is taken to telling his aid he no longer recognizes the g.o.p., which he now views as an existential threat to the nation's democracy. people who disagree with joe biden according to joe biden are now "an existential threat to the nation like al qaeda or climate change. i thought that by definition is so profound that we must declare war upon it in order to survive. this threat that biden is referring to is you. he is talking about his fellow americans. no president has ever spoken like this come ever. joe biden does it regularly and he certain to do it again tomorrow. the most painful of all, biden is likely to use racial wounds in order to make his point. there is no behavior worse than this. always politics is bad, no matter what flavor those politics happen to be. no race politics is better than any other. all of it is poison.

where is politics subdued the individual into the group. it erases people, it dehumanizes them. elevates appearance over initiative and decency and all the other god-given qualities that makes every person of every color unique, yet morally equal to every other person. and above all, race politics always makes us hate each other. and always in a very predictable way. so let's say you were to make a identity politics mandatory. how could you be surprised when that leads to weight identity politics. you could not be surprised. you did it and it was always going to happen. and then what happens next? nothing good. race politics is a sin, race politics always leads to violence and death. they learned that in rwanda in 1984. killed 800,000 people. and response to those horrors that were something we might learn from.

they moved to the opposite direction from when joe biden is currently taking the united states. go to ethnicity has been stripped out of schoolbooks and roped off government identity cards and the newspapers and radio stations steer clear as well." they notionally headed to the kitchen, the racial identification that seemed to loom so large ten years ago as extremists begin their mass killings. they have deemphasized race and rwanda, intentionally and systematically. rwandan citizens are citizens first, members of racial or travel groups, second or not at all. there've been no more genocides in rwanda, and that could easily be the path forward for this country was also pure there was only one answer to rising racial tension, and that is to de-escalate and do it we've tried to do for hundreds of years, which is work for meritocracy and treat people as

human beings greeted by god rather than his faceless members of interest groups that might benefit some political party. we have a moral duty to do this, because all people have equal moral value, no matter what they look like. all lives matter, period. it is the determination of god. most americans already believe it. they'd like to see a return to the american way of life. the american way of life is meritocracy. judge me by what i do, not by how i look. by the content of my character, not the color of my skin. we have a monument on the mall to this. and suddenly every voice and power is leading us in the opposite direction. and everybody knows this. only our leaders stand in the way of fixing a problem that is growing worse by the day. glenn has watched all of this, an independent journalist. he joins us tonight.

glenn, thank you so much for coming on. every mass shooting of course is a tragedy come every murder is a tragedy come every death is tragedy, but how chilling was it to watch the immediate mobilization of a political party using the pretext of a killing to make political points. i don't give ever seen anything like it. >> yeah, i think what of the things that a healthy society does is unites whenever there's a horrific accident. we saw that in the wake of 9/11, for example for a few days or a couple of weeks. unfortunately, another path can be taken and often is by political leaders. you might remember in 1985 when there was that hideous attack on the federal courthouse in oklahoma city, the clinton administration immediately seized on not saying we need backdoor access to people to control the internet where this information is spreading. after 9/11, right-wing leaders

like newt gingrich explicitly argued we need to amend the first amendment to control the ability of muslim radicals to be able to spread their hateful message. so often these crises are seized upon by leaders to demand more power. this idea that for example the first amendment doesn't protect hate speech is completely false. i think what is critical to note is that every political ideology, every last one has psychopaths or extremists who carry out violence in the name of that ideology and to try to blame your political opponent or do -- prescribed guilt to people who share that ideology is a completely atrocious act, because you are exploiting the corpses and not expressing sadness over them. >> tucker: shouldn't there at least be a pause? all of us can learn lessons from tragedy, a lot of people do what they do. how did this happen? i think that about all tragedy is. but it seems like the period where we pause and let the

sadness in canada remember all united -- it makes as equal as people. that time is evaporated. it is like instance now. i wonder what that says about our leaders. >> i was really amazed at not just the rapidity with which this coordinated messaging campaign emerged to try to blame this network and political opponents, but also just how unanimous it was, particularly since the only thing that was known was about the person who carried out this massacre was a 181 page, very densely written manifesto that is you said, has a wide range of unrelated ideas. he called himself a left-wing authoritarian on the one hand, a fascist on the other hand, there's no way these people could've taken the idea to have learned about the mental health of this person. they didn't care what the facts were, they saw an opportunity and those corpses laying on the ground and the opportunity was political and exploit native and

they seized on it together and quickly in a way that they made clear that their concern was sadness for the victims was a complete pretense they instantly weaponize before anything was known. >> tucker: anyone who shows no reverence in the face of death should make us nervous. i think anyone's death at any place -- i believe that. glenn greenwald, thank you so much. >> thanks, tucker. >> as the usual activist to the murders in buffalo in the weekend to attack the political opponents, including this channel, on twitter, pointing out that it's disgusting and insane to exploit this tragedy, suspended him for pointing that out. someone who said actually, we shouldn't jump to quick and dirty partisan conclusions from a mass murderer was banned from saying that by twitter. so this tells you a lot -- let that sink in for the moment. we will bring on dylan, the ceo

of the center for american liberty. we are happy to have him join his. thank you so much for coming on. it seems to me at base, not even a political point, but a humane point. hold on a second, we don't know everything. let's just bow before the sadness of this moment and not jump to politically convenient conclusions from it trashing other people's rights-of-way on the basis of it. that is no hate speech? tell me how this works? >> this is exactly how twitter has been working as well as the other social media companies for the last few years. we now limit the government has a lot to do with this, but in short, this is a microcosm. something horrible happens, politically powerful voices with blue checks and a lot of followers and immediately begin spreading. they are staffed by these woke young people put out there, and

then you have this story that has nothing to do with it actually happened. that gave me is to play when we were kids. mike davis simply pointed out that before we rush to judgment, let's look at a few things that this person actually said. of the shooter's own words, which are very different than the narrative that the biden administration and their lackeys in the media have been pushing. he got suspended for a supposedly -- it's unclear, they don't even explain why. we assume it is because of this tweet. mike is very well connected. he has a lot of allies in washington and a lot of people complained about this over the last few hours. twitter took notice of those powerful people talking back and they all suspended him today saying it was a mistake and in error, but thousands of people every day are taken down from social media for doing exactly what mike did, which is staying

truthful, thoughtful things that are not in the narrative that the left is trying to push. and their voices are silenced, sometimes permanently. that's what's wrong with social media. users have no rights, mike had no way of knowing that what he put out there was going to get him suspended i'm not able to speak on this important topic. this really needs to change. there's so many things wrong with this picture that really limit our speech. the end result is to make people like you and me think twice before we stay truthful things on social media for fear of not being able to say the next full think, and that's not healthy. >> it's so unhealthy. it makes people paranoid and afraid and it gives rise to conspiracy theories is clamping down on speech always does that. why not let people speak and the consenting adults who choose our leaders in this democracy can decide for themselves who is right on the basis of whatever facts are presented. it seems counterproductive. if you want to lower the temperature come if you want to

make the country more stable, you don't back down on speech, that is the last thing you do, correct? >> absolutely. the antidote to speech you don't like is more speech, not silencing it. glenn was exactly right. that's one of the biggest mistakes of our lifetime and fire government. we have people even on the right -- liz cheney came out today and put out a very divisive statement blaming leadership for white supremacy, anti-semitism, and so on. get a hold of yourself. that is really not what happened here in this circumstance. crazy people do crazy things there at the mental health failure in the situation is going unexamined because that is not the narrative that the left wants to push on the left is in control of the narrative that we get to see. again, nothing wrong with hearing different viewpoints. it doesn't kill me to hear different viewpoints. they have a video today showing exactly what is happening.

twitter employees knowledge that the left is intolerant of different viewpoints, the right is happy to hear a different viewpoint, so guess what question i could you are on the left platform, you have to silence the right. a gun, i hope we have some changes at twitter, another big social media, because it can be a very powerful tool to be able to learn and hear more about things you didn't know it may be might change your mind about something if you are able to hear different viewpoints. >> . true. great to see you tonight. thank you. >> thank you. >> tucker: all the sudden there's a push in the senate to rush to european countries next to russia into nato. what would be the effects of that? has anyone thought this through? probably not. this week on the verge of improving yet another $40 billion for ukraine.

it adds up to escalation of the war most americans didn't think we were in. what is happening here? kelsey cover it is up. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ >> tucker: a few months ago,

russia invaded ukraine. that is russia's fault. but you would have to be at idiot not to ask the context in which this happened. why did it happen exactly? one of the reasons it happened is because policymakers in the united states kept pushing ukraine to join nato. that benefits the united states, and they knew that. and now we have a war. russia did nothing to prevent it. it's getting worse. no mitch mcconnell in the united states senate says that we need to come up for some reason, to fast-track nato memberships to more nearby countries, sweden and finland. >> we hope to do it as rapidly as possible. your question is, what is rapidly as possible? and i think certainly we hope to achieve it before the august recess when congress typically goes out of session. obviously that would be well before the fall election with

regard to the size of the boat, i think it would be very significant, not unanimous, but very significant. nato was arctic them a successful, now it will be even stronger than it was. >> tucker: nato is the most successfully alliance in history? what is the point of nato now? no one could explain. and instead of explaining, we hear demands that nato expand as rapidly as possible. given the consequences and the benefits. again, silence. joining their friends on the democratic side, they plan to send $40 billion to ukraine immediately. that is what we believe. to promote that bill, mitch mcconnell, jump on it if of texas may be wondering, how do you walk around a war zone like that? it's certainly interesting.

why is congress so focused on ukraine, but you can't find baby formula, you can't even fill your truck, because things in our economy are declining really rapidly. don't ask questions. according to congressman of texas, asking questions like that, really any questions at all thinking you are a citizen makes you pro-russia. >> depressing. people are saying, we can't put baby formula on ourselves. my response to that is, how much can you buy with $4 million benchmark none, because it's not a money issue. it's a manufacturing issue. we have to solve it with leading -- frankly telling the fda to approve safe baby formula and imported from europe. that would be one solution. it was not america first. when you let russia and china do whatever they want around the world and establish their version of a global order. that puts america last, because

we cannot prosper and a global order led by russia and china. >> tucker: anyone who disagrees with jim crenshaw is pro-russia, frankly. well, frankly, he's attempting to deflect from answering these questions. no concern about the border of your own state, texas. that is a fair question. kelsey covered his pro-american, lifelong democrat, roy is grateful to have her join us tonight. thank you so much for coming on. if you were in the house still, you left after the end of last cycle, but if you are still there, i don't think he would be able to see a single word without being denounced as pro-russia. >> which is a problem for democracy. i think the real question here, tucker, that we are all asking these leaders in washington is, what is the rush? why are our political leaders from both parties rushing this

through without giving the american people the opportunity to actually look at what is in the bill and examine what the cost will be to us, not just today with this bill, but with the next round of $40 billion or whatever billions they will ask for in the next round and the next round, and the next round. there is no imminent threat to the safety and security and freedom of the united states coming to us from russia. in fact, there is no imminent threat or even long-term threat of russia invading finland or sweden. russia can barely hold on to a very small sliver of ukraine right now. as these leaders again, what is the rush? what we do know is that the biden administration has failed to clearly define any objectives in this proxy war on ukraine but they failed to define what winning looks like, so clearly there is no end in sight without that being defined. we can look at afghanistan, very

recent examples of what happens when you don't have that clearly defined mission. so the american people were struggling with high inflation, basic necessities that people need to live, costs increasing, and yet with this $40 billion of funding and what will come next and next and next, the american people deserve to know what this will cost us financially, what it will cost our national security with the increased potential of a nuclear conflict if this is allowed to continue. speak of the more i think about it, the more golf or eye patch mccain to attack moms who are worried about baby formula as "pro-russia." that's probably the most outrageous things i've ever heard. why not just answer the question? why the attacks? what does that tell you? >> it tells you they don't really want the american people to know what is in this bill and what will come next and what it will truly cost us, not just a few of us, but all of us as the

american people today and what appears to be, if we continue down this path, for the long term to come. resorting to name-calling and smearing, clearly to the american people. >> tucker: you've been smeared since day one, you've never lost her composure or moved off course, and i definitely admire the way you've handled the attacks. chelsea gabbard, thank you. >> thank you. >> tucker: for years we've taken your post seriously. they are worth taking seriously. kind of a big deal, no? congress is about to hold the very first public hearing on the question in 50 years, and you will get a preview of that straight ahead. we are america's doctors. and some of us... are grandparents too. we want you to know. we trust the covid vaccine. for ourselves. for our patients. for our kids. so should you. ♪ music ♪

>> tucker: amazing new images tonight from our border, really pretty stunning. our men on that story tonight.

>> let's start with that mind-boggling drone video shot by correspondent joba lujan and are a video journalist. this is on patrolled private property in eagle pass, texas, and in the past eight days there's been more than 2,000 migrant crossings in this exact spot. this is a snapshot of a crisis that stretches nearly 2,000 miles. one week from today, title 42 is scheduled to end, meaning that migrants would no longer be denied u.s. access because of covid concerns. so the border patrol, which does not have the resources to slow down the flow, is trying to at least set up a massive compound in eagle pass that it could be used for housing and processing. pulling agents from other part of the border, and without logistical fix, the hope is now for a political fix with numerous democrat lawmakers joining republicans and calling to keep title 42 as it is.

>> these are the tools that you have come all the tools in the toolbox. let's not remove it. >> in march, there were 221,000 migrant encoders at the border. that was the highest number and if the history of homeland security. we have brand-new numbers, they just broke the march record with 245,000 dh assets without title 42, we could see 558,000 migrant encounters a month, two and a half times the record. >> tucker: amazing. i think much for that. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: here's what we know about ufos, the u.s. government has verified they are real and a sense that there's objects moving in the sky that we cannot identify, they are

certain they do not belong to a foreign nation, they are not from russia or from china. and third we know that these objects are moving in ways that we cannot replicate, explain, or even understand. everyone who studied this in the u.s. government will admit that privately. no one is really said that out loud, and that may change very soon. so for the first time in half a century, there will be a public hearing on ufos. the subcommittee will hear from two pentagon officials tomorrow on what the defense department actually knows about these objects, depending on the intel agencies reportedly feuding tonight on how much the public should know. a man who does now, this program looking into these, he joins us tonight. thank you so much for coming on. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: what could possibly be the justification for holding back from the public what the u.s. government, which the public pays for, knows about these objects? >> in fact, it might not be what

we know, tucker, but the fact that we don't know some things. clearly from a national security perspective, the last thing you want to do is ever broadcast your intelligence gaps to your enemy. and in this particular case, he said it yourself, there's a lot more we don't know that we do know. but you are right, this is a historic mood. since 50 years ago, the last time we are faced with this coming of the air force briefing the results of project blue book. here we are half a century later and now we have seen your dod officials now, not just the air force, coming up and providing information to congress and ultimately the american people. >> tucker: do you know if there have been conversations between american officials and their counterparts in say, russia and china over these? they are not just spotted around u.s. military installations, but also in those countries and around the world, do ever talk talk about this off-line? >> let me give you a real

example, a very classified memorandum back in the 60s that the united states and russia agreed in writing that we would report to each other when we were looking at the northern tier, making sure that neither one of us thought the other was shooting a nuclear weapon at the other. this is small paragraph that says look, if you happen to see a ufo, do us a favor, call us first before you press the button, because it may very well be just that, a ufo, and not us. i think there are certain examples of that where we had information sharing with other countries, some cases other countries -- and a law passed recently that wasn't sponsored by senator marco rubio where it says now we are enjoying -- we must, we have to work with our friends and allies on this topic. it's no longer an option. we have to do it. >> tucker: you've answered your questions. one, the u.s. government has had

full awareness of this for 60 years. this was in the 1960s you said. and second, we know for certain these are not foreign military aircraft. >> multis manus, i suspect there will be more hearings after this prayer this is just establishing the baseline for congress. but we know again about project blue book, we know about some efforts beforehand, and we know about my program. but what about the 40 some years in between? what other efforts to the u.s. government have? what did we learn in that time? and is there way we can get that information now under a single tense so we are not, in essence, reinventing the wheel. we could compare and contrast information as compared to what we are learning with more capable equipment. >> tucker: this is an inherently significant story. you persisted and we appreciate it. thank you so much for that

preview. >> thank you for having me. abortion enthusiasts are promising a summer of rage they've artie seen people who really can only fairly be described as unhinged taking to the streets on that subject in favor of this ritual. we will bring you the very latest on what's happening outside your door. ♪ ♪

i'm dan o'dowd and i approved this message. tesla's full self- driving technology. the washington post reported on "owners of teslas fighting for control..." "i'm trying..." watch this tesla "slam into a bike lane bollard..." "oh [bleeped f***]"

this one "fails to stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk." "experts see deep flaws." "that was the worst thing i've ever seen in my life." to stop tesla's full self-driving software... vote dan o'dowd for u.s. senate. the choice for attorney general is clear. democrat rob bonta has a passion for justice and standing up for our rights. bonta is laser focused on protecting the right to vote and defending obamacare. but what's republican eric early's passion? early wants to bring trump-style investigations on election fraud to california, and early says he'll end obamacare and guard against the growing socialist communist threat. eric early. too extreme, too conservative for california.

♪ ♪ >> tucker: ever since someone inside the supreme court broke centuries of tradition and law by leaking sam alito's draft opinion in which he argued for overturning roe v. wade, they've been harassing their families at home. they have attacked a police in l.a., they firebombed a pro-life movement on sunday and they held a pro-abortion protest at the arizona state capitol. remember safe, legal, and where? they are just for it now, and they are saying it. they shot some pretty shocking footage of the people who were there. here is a sample. >> keep your laws of me. >> [bleep] [indistinct]

>> tucker: you don't have to be a religious person to see that there's a spiritual component to all of this. allison is a pro-life advocate who joins us. thank you so much for coming on. this doesn't -- it seems like we've left the realm of a political debate or even a bully debate over rights and moved into another realm entirely. >> it so hard to watch, because

it is human beings treating human beings the worst. but time and time again, pro-life individuals go out, they try to make the case for life, they are willing to take this verbal beating come of verbal harassment because someone who suffers more than that pro-life individual out on the streets is the preborn child. that is what we are fighting for in the pro-life movement. every single child lost to abortion is violated, they are dismembered, poisoned, starved of nutrition. that is why these pro-lifers keep going out trying to make the case, keep trying to have the debate. that anger and vitriol is not going to change anyone's heart or mind spirit we have the pro-life movement are still showing up, trying to serve them. i'm in, listen, some of the things that were said, they're not even medically accurate. these people need a lesson in science, and prenatal development, embryology. they are completely wrong, and i feel for a lot of these young women, because they've been lied to. they have been lied to by big

media, big abortion, planned parenthood, who tell them these things that are lies bid i'm really glad you are covering this. grateful for a diverse pro-life movement that has continued to push back. >> tucker: it's interesting we see this in terms of religious faith. and i think that there is a component of this that revolves a religious faith. you are the treasury secretary of the united states was at the other day -- if women choose toe families, to do the thing that brings people to deepest joy, have their own children come out are detracting from the big companies they should be dutifully slaving away for. maybe that is the reason that big companies support one side in this debate? >> yeah, i just thought starbucks is also saying that they are going to pay for people to go get abortions. isn't that convenient? when big corporations pay you to and the life of your child rather than actually supporting women employees. i would love to work together, we would love to work together with these pro-abortion meant to

say look, we've got to find some common ground here. these employers should not be paying you to kill your child. i need to take care of women. the pro-life movement, if they are going to have this summer of rage, tucker, then we are going to have a summer of service. as my friend on the pro-life movement chuck donovan, said, we are going to continue to support women and moms to make sure we are represented, we are taking care of, we are not told we have to and the life of our child in order to succeed. i just like you said, there is something dark about the way that the left is pursuing their arguments right now. it is abortion at all costs. at any point in pregnancy for any reason and no one can question that. we have the pro-life movement are willing to answer hard questions and answer concerns that maybe some of these people have about the life of the mother, ectopic pregnancies, lies about miscarriage management going around. we are answering them, but they

refuse to have the debate. that looks like desperation for that level of anger is desperation. we want to tell people they are going to get more fulfillment working for some stupid company them from being parents is such a lie. i take a lot of people are going to turn 50 and realize it is a lie. i hope that is not true. allison, great to see you. thank you. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: whatever you think of kamala harris, and you are guessing if you're watching the show we run a passionate fan of kamala harris, we've got to give her credit for being the single most entertaining person to ever hold public office in this country up at the tate proves that. and today it we've got an amazing one. stay tuned.

♪ did you know you can address one of the root causes of aging by targeting all the cells in your body? try tru niagen- researched by the world's top scientific institutions and backed by over 200 scientific studies and 30 patents. tru niagen is proven to increase nad, to support heart and muscle health, and energy production that starts in your cells. address one of the root causes of aging with tru niagen. search tru niagen to learn more. so many people are overweight now and asking themselves, with tru niagen. "why can't i lose weight?" for most, the reason is insulin resistance, and they don't even know they have it. conventional starvation diets don't address insulin resistance. that's why they don't work. now, there's golo. golo helps with insulin resistance,

getting rid of sugar cravings, helps control stress and emotional eating, and losing weight. go to golo.com and see how golo can change your life. that's g-o-l-o.com.

cal: our confident forever plan is possible with a cfp® professional. a cfp® professional can help you build a complete financial plan. visit letsmakeaplan.org to find your cfp® professional. ♪♪ >> tucker: everybody makes fun of kamala harris because, why wouldn't you? it's just too easy. but, here is, one thing you can say, she is underrated as a

philosophical voice. you could really do a page a day calendar. it was kamala harris who pointed out, it is time for us to do what we have been doing, and that time is every day. in other words, today's the first day of the rest of your life. children are our future. we didn't think he could get better than that. but we underestimated that, as we so often have. kamala harris, our page a day calendar vice president speaking to the state department telling us about the importance of working together. >> our world is increasingly more interconnected and interdependent. that is especially true when it comes to the climate crisis. which is why we will work together and continue to work together to address these issues, to tackle these challenges, and to work together as we continue to work operating

from the new norms, rules, and agreements that we will convene to work together on to galvanize. >> tucker: if you were to take a bunch of cliches and put them in a blotter, that is what you would get. congratulations, kamala harris. we will see you tomorrow. have the best night of the ones you love. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> sean: welcome to hannity. it is the night before the all important primary and up the candidate that i am president ke and president trump and doris will be. we will continue our investigation into his opponent, kathy barnett. i know these three republicans, they are not anymore. now tonight, the mystery surrounding kathy barnett get stranger and stranger appeared there still more questions than there are answers tonight about her