state, this is the second year in a row joe biden has failed t acknowledge the anniversary of d-day, but he released a proclamation about national ocean month. that seems to be the case. at least that's what it looks like. not good. tucker is good. he is up next. always remember i am waters and this is my world. good evening and welcome to tucker carlson tonight. peter navarro is the pitcher of a law-abiding american citizen. a 72-year-old retired business school professor who has a phd from harvard university. his most recent job was extremely white-collar. he served as the white house trade advisor in the last presidential administration. famous for his tough stance on china. he's never been charged with a crime and has never packaged

fentanyl from mexico. he probably does yoga and is riding his bicycle. peter does not seem like a criminal, much less a danger to this nation. and yet last friday federal agents arrested peter navarro a reagan national airport in washington. they did not call his lawyer as is customary in cases like this. they didn't even come to his house. it was feet from the fbi building. they could have walked, but the didn't. instead they took him down in public as you would a fugitive terror mastermind so everyone could see it and learn the lessons they were sending. they handcuffed peter navarro and put him in leg irons and threw him into a cell. he is now facing years in prison . so what did peter navarro do to deserve treatment like this? he resisted a subpoena from the january 6th committee. the january 6th committee is washington's latest inquisition run by nancy pelosi with help from liz cheney and adam kinzinger.

navarro resisted that subpoena because he had nothing to do with january 6th. nothing whatsoever. that is not disputed. peter navarro did not break int the capitol. he did not encourage anyone els to break into the capitol. he was not there that day and had no idea it would happen. that is beyond dispute and nanc pelosi and liz cheney know that. if you really wanted to figure out what happened on january 6t last person you would talk to. you would be talking to ray epp and various fbi informants. finding out what happened on january 6th and why is not the point of the exercise. the point of the exercise is preventing donald trump from running for president again. in the service of that goal, pelosi and liz cheney demanded that navarro surrender conversations with president donald trump, his former boss. when he refused to do that congress held him in contempt and then the justice department filed criminal charges against peter navarro.

this is not the way civilized countries operate. just because you control the white house and the houses of congress does not mean you get to throw your political opponents behind bars. that's not what we do in america . that's what they do in haiti. but that is what we are doing now. peter navarro is not the first. bidens justice department also arrested steve bannon for a similar fake crime. steve bannon is awaiting trial this summer. this is not something we have seen before. it's a huge step toward the politics of a third world. the media job is to push back against power. they are applauding because it turns out no punishment is too severe for those who disagree with the national news media. watch them gloat. what happened to peter navarro is what should have happened to peter navarro. he was indicted. when you are indicted, you are arrested. >> what peter navarro did was s far out of bounds and indefensible.

this prosecution is about punishing navarro based on his blatant disrespect for the congressional subpoena. >> they really are your enemies. they are not covering the news. they are plotting ways to hurt you. that is true. they are not optional. they lecture you. comply with them or go to jail. that is the message the lawyers on television are saying. let's pretend for a moment that was true that fact not true. if there was in fact a lot like that, for that lot to be legitimate of would have to be like all laws applied fully across the board and no less then the interning general himself said that again and again and again. i came to work here because we are committed to the rule of la and to seeking equal justice under the law. that is merrick garland in january. quote, we conduct every investigation guided by the sam norms. now, those are the norms under which this country has lived fo 250 years. it is not justice unless it's

applied equally to all adult american citizens, period. anything less than that is not justice. but we are getting much less than that and it's very obvious. here is one example. 10 years ago this month congres voted overwhelmingly on a bipartisan vote, 17 democrats, to hold eric holder the then attorney general in criminal contempt of congress. holder had refused to turn over documents showing how the obama administration had armed the mexican drug cartels. remember that? one with firearms they sent to mexico and the fast and furious program was then used to murder an american border patrol officer. it was a scandal at the time in case you don't recall. >> he died in december 2010, killed by guns tied to an obama administration planned that armed mexicans. the scandal officials tried to hide it by wrongly claiming executive privilege. e-mails containing the house oversight committees reports showed top officials knew they

sent guidance to mexico even before his death. the border patrol which sent th team into the desert didn't kno about the operation. >> that was a legitimate scanda that implicated the entire u.s. government. people actually have power, not retiree sitting in jail because of what they did on ask january 6. eric holder was the very center of it. but if holder refused to comply with the subpoena from the congress. did the fbi arrest eric holder for that? please. he was never even seriously considered. holder asserted executive privilege, meaning the right to have conversations with the executives that are private. he cited the long-standing policy of respecting executive privilege and he got away with it. a week ago peter navarro made this exact point. he suede the justice department pushing back against the subpoena four days before he wa arrested. in that suit navarro cited

policy written by the doj legal counsel. it reads this way. quote, since the 1970s this office consistently advise the president and his immediate advisors are absolutely immune from testimonial compulsion by congressional committee on matters related to their official duties, and a quote. in other words, if somebody asserts executive privilege at the very least congress doesn't get to arrest them. before anyone is arrested they have to go to a judge to rule o weather or not executive privilege is valid in this case. that's what happened in eric holder's case. the federal judge rejected eric holder's claim and still he was not arrested. why? you know why. because he's a leading democrat. but in peter navarro's case merrick garland did not even bother to ask a judge. they just arrested peter navarr at national airport. so what we are seeing here isn' really about peter navarro or

steve bannon. what we are seeing is a massive escalation in the use by the democratic party of our justice system for partisan revenge. that's exactly what that was. peter navarro would not shut up so they threw him in handcuffs. in fact, at the same moment peter navarro was thrown in jai for serving executive privilege a clinton lawyer was acquitted by a jury seated by an obama appointed judge. three of the jurors in that cas gave money to hillary clinton's campaign and those same jurors declined to punish michael sussman for lying to the fbi to advance the russian collusion myth that helped hillary clinton 's campaign. following all of this? how did those jurors get on the jury and stay there? the fbi pretended to be outrage by the fact that michael sussma had lied to them but then we learned actually the fbi was working with f michael sussman and his law firm perkins khoi. perkins khoi had an fbi workspace in its offices in washington for a decade.

michael sussman was so close to the fbi he had a key card to fb headquarters. we know this from a recently released text exchange. we are quoting. do have a badge or need help getting into the building? the fbi is general counsel jame baker asked sussman. we are quoting now. i have a badge sussman replied. sussman had a badge to the fbi building? how do we get one of those? we are not leading democratic lawyers so we cannot have them. michael sussman knew he would never be punished. what is going on here? "the federalist" been white garden explains how we should understand these two prosecutions. quote, they send an unmistakabl message. we can get you anytime, anywher on any grounds we choose. you cannot touch a single one o ours. that's it right there. this is a partisan play by a political party that is somehow completely taken over our

largest law enforcement agency. sussman is not even the biggest example of this. andrew mccabe, lisa page, peter strzok. all of them lead to the feds as well. that's a crime. none were hauled off and leg irons. they are now at cnn, msnbc and georgetown respectively. they were rewarded with better jobs for what they did. they always are. jim clapper and john brennan committed perjury on television before congress. there is no dispute about that. what do they do, they are on tv too. hunter biden lied on a federal gun forum. that's a felony. how was he punished? a mild probing on cbs that he shrugged off as if it were nothing. watch. >> why did you have a gun? >> again, it was it. in my life that was difficult.

i don't know. >> according to the reporting a one point the secret service went looking for the record of sale. do know anything about that? >> nothing. >> they do know about the secre service being involved? >> not at all. i don't know. i don't think that is true. >> i don't know why the secret service were involved. really? you had no idea? they were with you. they helped you. you committed a gun felony. it's all out there. but hunter biden is the president's son and more importantly he's a faithful party loyalist. you know as well as he does he doesn't have a thing to worry about. he can flaunt his crimes. radar online.com got pictures of him casually waving his illegal firearm around with a several years ago. the pitcher show hunter biden's finger on the trigger of the gu as well as crack cocaine and drug paraphernalia. a weapon of war in the hands of a drug addict. is the justice department bothered by this? of course not.

you know what bothers the justice department quite a bit? defying the democratic party. you do that and your house gets rated by a swat team that tips off cnn before it happens. roger stone discovered that the hard way. >> exclusive footage you are looking at right now from cnn a the fbi arrives at roger stone' residence in fort lauderdale, florida, taking him into custody . they arrived before dawn, just after 6:00 a.m. a dozen officers we are told. >> so, that's the actual norm i you are tony podesta know and work for the democratic party. nothing you do will get you in trouble and you know it. if you are roger stone you have not done nothing wrong but you have given the finger to the democratic party and they show up at your house with guns. that's the norm the attorney general is upholding. serve the democratic party and you will be rewarded even if yo

are a felon. almost exactly the moment the doj was putting peter navarro i shackles, the doj was dropping more serious charges against th two left-wing lawyers that trie to incinerate cops and burn the to death in their patrol cars. this pair had faced 30 years in jail on terrorism charges but that was too tough for the bide doj. why? they got the republicans. liz cheney is not giving you a lecture on the people trying to burn police officers to death are a threat to the democracy. ignore them. it never happens. this happens all the time. and california career felon called tony walker executed a 19 -year-old berkeley student called seth smith. he walked up for no reason had never seen him before and executed him. he fired a gun into the back of his head. why did he do this? it was a racially motivated attack. if that he said that, here's th interesting thing.

a guy was executed because the the wrong skin color. sound like a hate crime. merrick garland's doj did not push charges. a month ago prosecutors caught an unbelievable deal with walker . they sentence him on a single charge of, brace yourself, voluntary manslaughter. he executed a college student. that sounds like voluntary manslaughter. this is a dangerous trend with people dying. nothing destroys legitimacy of our institution more than politicize law enforcement. you cannot have that. justice must be blind if there is a single institution we have to preserve for the sake of our children and grandchildren. it is our justice system and th law enforcement agencies that serve it. they cannot be corrupt. if they are corrupt, it's prett hard to live here. liz cheney and nancy pelosi and the rest of the lunatics on the january 6 committee have done far more damage to this

democracy then the rioters ever did. far more work and now they are trying to make it worse. axe eoc is reporting that some members of the committee, quote one big changes on voting right and to abolish the electoral college. abolishing the electoral college ? if you are against that, of course, you are undermining democracy. >> was it a conspiracy? >> certainly, if you look at th court filings. >> do you believe it was a conspiracy? >> i do. at six lamely broad and well organized. really chilling. >> it is really chilling. what is really chilling is when they get to arrest people not because they violated meaningfu laws or pose a threat to the united states, but because thei politics are unacceptable. because they have given the finger to people like liz cheney . is liz cheney okay with that? we texted liz cheney on friday.

are you okay with this? they directed arrested a 72 -year-old man. doesn't that cross a line? will you say something about it? she did not respond. the january 6 committee has jus hired a former producer of good morning america called james goldston. he will oversee the primetime hearings on thursday night. the show trial now has a production crew. they will be covering that in great detail on thursday. by arresting peter navarro they hope to shut up the local critics before it begins. peter navarro is a brave man wh is not shutting up. he joins us now for his first interview since being arrested. he is a former senior white house advisor and the author of taking back trump's america. he joins us now. thanks so much for coming on. how is this allowed? this is so outside the bounds. unless i am missing something, and if i am you will correct it. this is not how a civilized

country behaves. did you see it coming? if not, how was it allowed to happen? >> certainly, i saw it coming. we have entered really dangerou unprecedented waters. tucker, i was in a position where a partisan committee has weaponize the investigatory powers for the purpose of preventing donald trump from ever getting back in the white house. they subpoenaed me illegally. i was faced with the untenable choice of upholding executive privilege, which was not my pla village to waive. that is donald trump's to privilege to waive. i did my duty to the president. i did my duty to this country and here we sit. the civil suit i filed, tucker, i hope will be historically

important. there's really two constitutional issues at stake. the first with the weaponizatio that congress has investigatory powers is a clear violation of the separation of powers in our constitution. the legislative branch is not supposed to be the judge, jury and executioner. i heard one of your commentator when you played the clip. the purpose was to punish peter navarro. that is not their role. that's the judiciary role. that alone is sufficient to render what they have done illegal and therefore what what the department of justice did illegal. the bigger issue, tucker, and this is where the department of justice and committee was so disingenuous. i assert executive privilege preventing me from complying with the subpoena. instead of going to talk and negotiate the privilege with donald trump as the law requires , they went into this absurd notion that biden, a sitting incumbent president

could strip his immediate predecessor of executive privilege, and me, a staff member to the president, of wha the justice department itself, as you pointed out, has absolutely testimony immunity. it is absurd on its face. every step along the line- >> i have no doubt it's unconstitutional. i just want to get to the cente of it which is january 6. this is the january 6 committee. you saw liz cheney in that disgusting, ridiculous interview . did you have anything at all to do with january 6th? >> no. you had that exactly right. what you and i have now both said, which is absolute fact, i the mission of that partisan witchhunt kangaroo committee, which is unduly authorized and not properly constituted and ha no subpoena power. they have only one mission, to

concoct a fake hoax around january 6th based on criminal charges against trump to preven him from running for reelection and taking back the white house and 2025 january. that is all this is about. look, tucker, you said it. i live right next door, 50 yard from the fbi. on wednesday night i sent an e-mail to patricia, the deputy attorney and said i am seeking mode is here. i'm stuck between a rock and a hard place. i gave her the name of an attorney and told walter, the fbi agent who came banging on m door at the week before. i am here, just call me. no need to bang on my door. they chose a different route. they didn't call my attorney. instead they went through the shock and awe, and let me go to the airport and then take me

with five agents like i am an a qaeda terrorist. they lock being in a car and th next thing i know i am in leg irons, handcuffs and strip-searched. it was not without comity. at one point the fbi agents could not find the door to go into. the fingerprint machine didn't work. people do not want to sit in solitary confinement in leg irons denied food, denied water denied an attorney. this is what we live in. i studied in college and it too me until i was 72 to understand. >> you cannot arrest people for political reasons. it is very simple. we've invited every member of that committee on this show. they are all cowards. i think this is a huge change i the way this country operates and i wanted to extend our sympathy to you peter navarro. thank you and godspeed. >> thank you for your coverage.

>> how grotesque a joke is the january 6th committee? well, liz cheney and nancy pelosi have hired the producer from good morning america not t do a health update but to put together a primetime show trial this thursday. we will have are own. there are a lot of questions unanswered from january 6th. a lot. we will tell them to you at 8:0. a programming note. earlier this year we interviewed . we decided to learn more. we went to his farm in nashville , tennessee and decided it was so interesting we would do a documentary. tucker carlson original episode is tomorrow on fox news nation. it calls his farm outside nashville a redneck paradise. and it is. here is the trailer. how many shots does grandpa get? come on, baby. look at that. no pressure.

what are you building here? >> redneck paradise. >> double wide trailer. >> that is so cool. >> it is redneck disney world. ♪ music playing ♪ >> leprechaun music. braveheart. ♪ music playing ♪ >> to my fans, i love you dearly . make sure the critics go [ bleep ] yourself. >> thank you. god bless you. tucker carlson and the house tonight. >> usa! usa! usa!

>> that is cool. i hope we got that [ bleep] on tape. >> kid rock documentary start streaming tomorrow on fox nation . by the way we keep texting liz cheney asking her to come o the show and explain herself. how many people will you arrest? stop being a coward and come on the show, liz cheney. you remember the video of a criminal in la running over a woman and her child who was pushing a stroller or a significant development in that case, one that is hard to believe. that is next. kyle rittenhouse joins us with a major announcement live, straight ahead.

this is one of those videos that captures the chaos of american cities. this is a particularly awful one . it shows the driver of a stolen car in los angeles going into a mother and a child in a stroller . the driver had just been sentenced. but because george gastonia is the district attorney, not much of a sentence. we are in los angeles for that story. >> reporter: la da george

handling of this case is being blasted by critics after a juvenile was sentenced to just five months of diversionary cam after he ran over a mom and her baby and then tried leath fleeing the scene. it was not his first criminal offense. take a look at the video. this was last august. you see the 16-year-old driver with no license, stolen car, mowing the mom down with her baby and a stroller. he tries to flee the scene before a good samaritan purposely crashes his truck int him to stop him from getting away. multiple law enforcement source tell me that the driver was on felony probation at the time of the hit and run for spiking a girls drink in high school in 2019. despite that teens criminal record, the da administration filed two lesser felony charges for the hit and run which he pleaded guilty to. in a statement to foxnews the office told us the five month sentence was an appropriate

resolution and said the sheriff department actually agreed with the lesser charges. la county sheriff immediately pushed back saying his agency was never consulted and had no involvement in the case. and that they would never be okay with the lightweight sentencing this juvenile received. now gascoigne office said a follow-up e-mail admitting the sheriffs department was never involved in the case and they would have to, quote, correct their statement to us. late last night i had a chance to speak to the mom who was run over. she has minor injury and thankfully her baby is okay. as you can imagine she is fear is how the case was handled telling me in part, quote, someone with a criminal record tried to kill me and my son. george gastonia thinks that fiv months of camp is a sufficient punishment. gas cohen and his staff are highlighting their incompetence and their complete disregard fo victims. the campaign to recall george cass cohen has collected over half a million signatures.

that's the most ever for any petition here in la county. they need about 70,000 more by the july 6th deadline to officially qualify and get it o the november ballot. we will keep you posted and wil send it back to you. >> thank you so much. those of us don't like the stuff. not just conservatives or republicans. nobody likes this stuff. he likes the stuff which is why he backed george nlh and larry in philadelphia. how did that work out? philadelphia is now one of the most dangerous countries in the country. and friday there was a mass shooting in philadelphia. you are seeing pitchers of people running away from the gu shots now. the shooting started with a fight between a couple people o the sidewalk. a bystander filmed the whole thing on his cell phone. democrats are blaming the shooting on the republican part and the nra. that is huge in philadelphia. in san francisco, the prettiest city in the country, another da is allowing criminals to attack

people in broad daylight. this is a very liberal city. if it's too much for san francisco it is way too much. >> reporter: bay park to their car right here and the lady was walking up the street. the guy was waiting for her. as soon as she came appear he jumped her. >> reporter: joe has lived here his entire life and said incidents like this one where a 48-year-old woman was attacked right outside saturday, may 21st , are nothing new. in march last year 55 and 60 -year-olds were shot to the ground and robbed a block away. neighbors have given up. >> there is no way you can prevent it. >> reporter: they have ideas on what can be changed. >> they are criminals. you put them in jail and they are out of jail the same day doing the same damn thing. >> attacking women is very common. even if san francisco, this is too much. this has been an actual disaster . people have something to do

about it. there is a recall vote tomorrow. this is the reason this exists. the founder of the movement. we are honored to have him with us. thanks so much for coming on. how did you wind up. i assume you don't fund recall movements for a living. how did you wind up doing this one? >> first, thank you for having me. there was this concern when he was a candidate back in 2019. he had zero experience prosecuting any criminals whatsoever. he came from the defense side. he exploited a loophole where, believe it or not, there's stil a lot of people that don't understand that here in san francisco at least you don't need to have prosecutorial experience to run as the da as candidate. he did. he ran against three very well-qualified prosecutors. he won.

he got elected. the 1st week of january 2020 he was sworn into office. the first thing he did was thro a monkeywrench into the works i the whole criminal justice system in disarray. he fired seven of san francisco 's most prominent, most experienced prosecutors. that was the whole start. all of 2020, even under covid. he likes to use that as an excuse. blame everything on covid which is not true. for all of 2020 we saw multiple examples of his incompetence, o his malicious intent, of his policies that he was trying to put into place. by new year's eve 2020/2021, that fateful, very unfortunate day, that friday, there was a paroled felon. we keep hearing this over and over again. paroled felon.

they rob, they steal at gunpoint . this particular individual troy mcallister, he was drunk in a stolen car with drugs and a handgun, i believe. he lost control and crashed and hit two innocent women that wer on the street in the south part of san francisco area. that was the last straw for san franciscans and the last straw for me. that became the impetus. god rest their souls. they are the ones where the impetus to get this recall going . >> good for you. he is blaming the right as if that existed in san francisco. these are liberals that are sic of it. we are rooting for you tomorrow. richie greenberg, the man behin this, thank you and good luck tomorrow. >> thank you so much.

>> kyle rittenhouse joins us next live with a big announcement. we will be right back.

when, laura harris and othe figures in the democratic party encouraged a mob in kenosha, wisconsin and the summer of 2020 , kyle rittenhouse decided to try to defend the city. a car lot. the police were not there. he worked in kenosha. his family's father lived there. he shows up and tries to get murdered. kyle rittenhouse defends himself . other people tried to kill him with a gun. for doing that, he is put on trial and charged with murder. he was acquitted. at the same time virtually ever news organization in the countr defamed him and called him a murderer before the trial ended and called him repeatedly a white supremacist, which he is not. tech platforms enabled that defamation. now kyle rittenhouse is taking legal action against them. kyle rittenhouse is the founder

of the media accountability project. he joins us now to explain what they are doing. thanks to you for coming on. telis, kyle. good to see you. what action are you taking against the tech companies that made this defamation possible? >> we are going to make the media pay for what they did to me. they made it hard for me to liv a normal life. i cannot go out in public. i cannot go to the store. it's hard for me to go anywhere without security. doing basic things like taking dog to the dog park is difficult . they made it really difficult t be normal. they affected future job opportunities to me. i don't think i will ever be able to work or get a job because i am afraid employers may not hire me. to me i think is entirely fair because of the lies repeated fo over a year by the tech platforms that are not journalists. they are soldiers in some sort of weird partisan war they are fighting. what are you doing to rectify this?

>> we are going to be taking them to court. go ahead. >> telis the legal action. >> sure. to answer your first question with regard with what we plan t do, we are looking at those. the first one i am looking at i facebook. mark zuckerberg announced in a video what kyle was involved in was a mass murderer and that is clearly defamatory as well. that is not protected by sectio 230 in the decency act. in my opinion section 230 allow you to take down violent things or things that people don't wan to hear by telling the truth about kyle which is not something that section 230 enabled facebook to take down. that's an example of what we plan to do with tech and plan t do in the defamation arena. 2 by defamation arena, you mean so-called news organizations? >> absolutely. you mentioned some of that on the way in.

certainly kyle was charged with a crime. news organizations are allowed to report on that. but calling someone a murderer in certain circumstances can be actionable. other things that media personality and people on socia media said were clearly defamatory. i think your comment about calling kyle a white supremacis is made up out of thin air. i don't know how the media can claim they didn't make a statement made up out of thin air without engaging in actual malice or most certainly negligence. i think we have some strong grounds to proceed. we are looking at an starting t look at those and evaluate them and look at opportunities to hold the media and tech accountable as promised. >> kyle, when you go into public , do people repeat to you things they saw on social media or on nbc news or cnn? >> there's been a few people. i received some harassment. thank goodness for my security for helping me not have to get

harassed to make sure that they keep me safe and if somebody does come up to me they make sure they will not harm me. thank god for them. >> todd, really quick. how exactly will you go after mark zuckerberg? >> i think we will sue for the defamatory statements that kyle engaged in mass murder and for violations of section 230 by taking down posts that told the truth about kyle. in essence they suppressed the truth by taking down truthful posts and they did that in violation of section 230. that does not provide protection . >> that's exactly right. it's not that they just defamed him but they also took down any defensive him or the facts abou him dealing with the vaccines and other things that were in ukraine. i appreciate what you all are doing. thank you both. thank you, todd. >> thank you, tucker. we are not sexualizing children.

they are, aggressively. new video of little kids at a drag queen event in texas. sexualizing children for sure. that is next.

♪♪ dads are special. fun. inspiring. always there for you. so make father's day extra special with gifts he'll love from weathertech. floorliners... cargo liner...

seat protector... sunshade... ready-to-wash system and cupfone. or our newest product, the golf cart mat. order these american made gifts or a gift card at weathertech.com have a very happy father's day. so many people are overweight now, and asking themselves, "why can't i lose weight?" for most, the reason is insulin resistance, and they don't even know they have it. conventional starvation diets don't address insulin resistance. that's why they don't work. now there's release from golo.

it naturally helps reverse insulin resistance, stops sugar cravings, and releases stubborn fat all while controlling stress and emotional eating. at last, a diet pill that actually works. go to golo.com to get yours. getting guns off our streets. one democrat's determined to get it done. attorney general rob bonta knows safer streets start with smarter gun control. and bonta says we must ban assault weapons. but eric early, a trump republican who goes too far defending the nra and would loosen laws on ammunition and gun sales. because for him, protecting the second amendment is everything. eric early. too extreme, too conservative for california.

on saturday, a nightclub in dallas held an event called dra your kids to pride. at the event, little kids dance as drag queens and got dollar bills. this sexualized children always is. there were a small number of brave processors. one was alex stein who tried to get into the event because it was a public event. watch. [ indiscernible]

[ bleep] [ indiscernible] >> take your mask off. good for alex stein. if more people acted like that we would have less sexualizing of children. the last thing they want you to do is see it. that's why they attack you when they do. a radio host in seattle joins us . jason, thanks for coming on. this is so crazy. it's hard not to think. i don't know what to thank of this. what are we watching? >> i am old enough to remember when drag queen story hours wer the things we were outraged at. that is clearly inappropriate. in this case you have a neon pink sign as a backdrop declaring it will not lick itself as adult drag performers are dancing and lip-synching. and even collecting dollar bill from young kids as their parent are sipping on drinks having a good time. it took place at a gay nightclu and bar. you drag the kids to pride. it was pitched as a family friendly event.

adults are in drag performing i this club. kids were either watching from the sidelines and handing out tips or in some cases they were even joining and posing as thei parents were watching. one of the performers declared in an interview that he hopes that kids start performing drag when they get older because it' a confidence booster. as this is going on there was a group of protesters from an organization called protect texas kids. they were showed up and confronted by supporters of the drag performers. check this video out. >> take it away. let's see how this turns out. [ bleep] [ bleep] you are child abusers. >> absolutely insane video. >> don't get kids involved, obviously. we appreciate it. thank you. more after the break.

test.

on thursday the gma produce teaming up with the democrats t bring you a full hour of januar sixth white supremacist insurrection. but it wasn't. there is a lot of outstanding questions. on thursday, we will get into them in detail. we will see you then. welcome to hannity. democrats want this to be january 6th week, but they will not give you the full story. by the way, there is a lot of context and texture and a lot o things they will not be telling you about. tonight, we are going to give you the vital information about what happened on january 6th, what happened on january 4th. we will tell you why the democrats are not serious about preventing something like this from ever happening again. just like they ignored the riot in 2020. they are mostly peaceful. okay. tell that to the