the cards to do the job shop parts and more and rock dotcoms know the pro-life stories about who we are as a nation inside the history of its opponents and the decade long fight against abortion overturning roe the powerful new special screening now only on fox station. >> and welcome to hannity. we begin this friday night with a fox news alert. it is official roe v. wade is no more . and coming up, we'll have my full monologue and we're going to cut through all clutter hysteria. we will separate for you fact from fiction. there's a lot of lying, propaganda, misinformation, fear mongering going. we'll tell you the truth that the media purposely ignores. but first, let's take you to the ground where protests now are breaking out all across the country at this hour, including some calls for a night of rage and violence here outside the supreme court.

our own kevin is with us. kevin , what's going on ? it's interesting. if you had been here earlier in the day, you would have seen a very, very different crowd. we're talking about primarily female. i'm a step out of the way so you can see it. it was mostly female, mostly young, very peaceful. but as is often the case in circumstances like this , sean, as the day goes on , the crowd begins to change just a bit more young men show off more people, tactical gear and masks and glasses, dark glasses, shades and that sort of thing. and somehow it changes the tone of what you're seeing. but thus far all day long it has been it has been peaceful and we expect it to stay that way. hopefully because there's a rather large law enforcement presence along the fence line, at least about 60 that we've seen uniformed officers. obviously there are more officers that are plainclothes within the crowd

who are hoping for the best. but thus far we've seen a lot of people passion, some prayer and mostly peaceful protesting . we'll keep an eye on it for you. but for now, back to you. kevin , any word on whether or not president biden authorized calling up national guard troops if needed? i have actually heard that . i have not confirmed that . the good question as soon as i can nail that down, i'll let you know. i will tell you this just over there, which you can't quite see because of the tree line probably sean. there are at least a dozen, maybe two dozen uniformed officers with shield and helmets and riot gear. when i drove up here , i noticed there were several military personnel carriers as well. so there is possible that that's the case. i haven't been able to lock that down. of course, as we see any i promise to let you know. all right, kevin , thank you as always. great report. we turn now to chicago where our own mike tobin is standing

by there tonight . mike , what's the latest on the ground in chicago? well, i certainly brought out a lot of numbers and a lot of passion in downtown chicago. this is federal plaza where the demonstrations started tonight and essentially what they've done is taken a big march all through downtown not only with the blessing of police but governor j.b. pritzker got out with the women in march and i say women because what makes this demonstration remarkable is it's almost entirely women. i ballpark the male population in this crowd somewhere around 5% with the women i've spoken with out here . they say they felt very disempowered when the decision came down. so their choice to come out here and demonstrate was to gather up in numbers and feel empowered again. they're pretty straightforward . they say they want to send a message to the elected officials that they are indeed a powerful voting bloc and the elected officials are going to have to keep that in mind as far as the way the march has gone. nothing along the lines of threatening behavior, anything that would make you think

that things would get violent. the worst we've seen is a couple of vulgar signs and some vulgar john . all right, mike tobin from chicago tonight . thank you . we'll bring you updates from those protests all night tonight . now despite the hysteria on the left, the supreme court ruling was a momentous decision that returns abortion law back to the states where it belongs as it is not enumerated in the constitution like the right to keep and bear arms, which we discussed at length last night. now some states with the most liberal abortion laws that even allow third trimester abortions take a look at a map. they will continue to allow them. that will include alaska, colorado, new jersey, new mexico, oregon, vermont, washington, d.c. so while democrats in the media mob predictably demagoguing and lying about this very ruling, we'll give you the facts straight up, let you decide first, let us be very clear . this decision does not make abortion in america illegal. it does not.

i know implying that they're saying it even but it does not . instead, individual voters you will now decide abortion abortion law at the state level per the 10th amendment of our constitution. and remember powers that are not enumerated in the constitution like the right to keep and bear arms are reserved for the states. so again in liberal states there will be few if any restrictions on abortion in some cases up until the very moment of birth. in fact, most states will continue to allow abortion at some level it might be some restrictions in one state, different ones in another state. here's the second fact about this ruling abortion was never enshrined in the us constitution as a right and it was never codified in law. instead it became the status for 50 years because of activist judges pretending that they were the legislative branch of government supposed to be separate coequal branches. they're not sometimes, as greg jarrett rightly pointed a great

column on fox news on roe v. wade is just one of more than two hundred and thirty times that the court has overruled this precious precedent that we often hear democrats talking about that would include plessy vs. ferguson. that's what legalized segregation. yeah, that precedent was done away with rightly so. and that awful dred scott decision that upheld slavery. another example in other words, overturning a precedent is not uncommon and in many cases as he just described, the right thing to do. now naturally roe v. wade was always at the mercy of the courts. but don't take my word for listen to far left hero of the left socialist or so justice ruth bader ginsburg. take a listen. will became a symbol i think for the right to life movement . both had a single target to hit

that this decision is most undemocratic decision by nine justices who nobody elected in to make policy for the country. my criticism of roe is that it seemed to stop the momentum which was the momentum wasn't on the side of change. now ginsburg's prediction has come true . she was right. roe has now been overturned and now this brings us to our third fact about today's ruling the court's decision today is about abortion and abortion alone. it's not about contraception, not about gay rights. it's not about interracial marriage. as many have been suggesting and lying about. in fact, the majority opinion makes this quite clear quote to ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize our decision concerns the constitution right to an

abortion and no other right nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion. now. naturally, the media mob democrats, they're kind of conveniently ignoring the truth, the facts, the text in the ruling. now why let truth get in the way of a great political narrative sort of like january six ? they want to use abortion just like yesterday's supreme court ruling on the second amendment as a wedge issue to fire up their base in the hopes that they may mitigate the pending losses many are predicting. so according to them, america is in peril, all because of evil republicans and of course donald trump . >> take a look. this is a devastating ruling as can be imagined. this is of course, that is just upended a half century of law of a constitutionally protected right to abortion that affects nearly every family across

america in one way or another. listen, it's a heartbreaking betrayal of half of the country watching the women there. it's emotional new debate over other rights that we thought were settled the right to contraception, the right to same-sex marriage, all of those are thrown into question today. this is going to be a legal civil war between the states. this is monumental because it's the first time we've seen the court take away a right. there really is a lot of people who believe this is a rigged court. all right. top democrats were just as dramatic and even more shameless with a ploy to turn this ruling into votes in november. take a look for yourself. this fall must have like more senators, representatives who codify a woman's right to choose in the federal law once again elect more state leaders to protect this right at the local level, we need to restore the protections of roe as law of the land.

we need to elect officials who will do that this fall. roe is on the ballot. personal freedoms are on the ballot. aware of this , the republicans are plotting a nationwide abortion ban. they cannot be allowed to have a majority in the congress. you have the power to elect leaders who will defend and protect your rights. and as the president said earlier today with your vote you can act and you have the final word. >> remember, they can't run on the great state of the economy because we have a forty one year year high of inflation. they can't run on gas prices because we set record after record after record and it's still going higher. they can't run on their foreign policy. they can't run on the damage they've done to our borders. but that's this is what they're going to run on the telegraph's it they're saying it would

be quite clear where they're headed with this and it gets worse. hillary clinton tweeted today that today's opinion will live in infamy. meanwhile, nancy pelosi followed her rant about the election with a dramatic reading of a poll. >> take a look. from time to time , i quote this poem by hit minoff here is my home. i will not be silent for my country has changed her face . the country has changed her face. i shall not give up on her. i shall remind her and sing into her ears until she opens her eyes. clearly we hope that the supreme court will open its eyes now pelosi of course the speaker in name only but the real speaker of the house, congresswoman alexandria cosio cortez, was even more distraught today. take a look for yourself with a supreme court justice that they chose to endanger the lives of

all women and all burdened people in this country. but not only that, they've chosen to strip rights for men to because frankly the right to our own bodies and the rights of our families. this is this is something that belongs to all of us . eeoc also that went on and predicted that people will die because of the court's decision and even joined the protest outside of the supreme court calling for people to take to the streets at the same demonstration or comrade maxine waters call for an insurrection against the court. >> take a look. you ain't seen nothing yet. women are dying on their backs no matter how they try to stop it. they have with the supreme court we will decide them. women will be about now thankfully their offenses heavily armed guards in riot gear around the court. they're there for a reason.

ever since the majority opinion was leaked, the justices have been targeted with harassment, threats of violence and by the way, no condemnation from the democrats. joe biden, his press secretary, other democrats, their addresses have been published online. protesters showing up at their home at their homes. the man traveling from calev fornia to the front door of justice cavanaugh and what was an attempt at a an assassination, a plot to assassinate him? we have in the case of amy coni barrett, you got the name of us kids school and location, the church she goes to the time she goes to church. wow. radicals have vandalized dozens of anti-abortion pregnancy centers all across the u.s. breaking windows, lighting fires, spray painting the message if abortions are unsafe, then neither are you now a militant group named james revenge that took credit for many of these attacks is calling for tonight to be a night and a summer of rage.

the group declared, quote, open season on pro-life americans claiming that it was fun and easy to attack conservatives even hinted at future attacks that might be much worse than fire graffiti. and yet maxine waters, other democrats, the media mob, they're not calling for calm and said they're whipping up their radicals supporters into a frenzy tonight . it's almost as if they don't actually respect our institutions. and let's not forget it wasn't that long ago. joe biden himself was very much against abortion. take a look. tell me about abortion. where where do you stand and how will you face that issue as it's going to be very difficult. i do not view abortion as a as a choice and a right. i think it's always a tragedy. >> and now with more, he's on the ground in new york for us tonight, our own lawrence jones lj, what's going on in new york city? hey, good evening. sounds you picked up where chuck schumer was attacking

cavanaugh said that you were ruled the day. well, the protesters about 5000. i haven't seen that many protesters since the summer riots are on their way right now to chuck schumer's home, the protests in front of his home. i don't know if this is the standard solidaire. chuck schumer, we still haven't heard any calls from police or the condemnation of his past comments after that sound bite that he said led to one person to actually make their way to this cabinet house and what we know to be attempted assassination, of course we end up turning himself in to authorities. but these protests right now have been mostly peaceful. we saw some vandalism on some statues earlier today, but they're marching about 4000 of them on their way to chuck schumer's home. and again, we still don't know who is the person that leaked those documents. we do have the decision now. but of course the person that lit the match, chuck schumer, as well as that leaker that put that leaked document out from the public, i think

they're getting what they want tonight . sean, i'll send it back to you in new york. so you're saying that people are marching and chuck schumer is home? i would say anybody that calls themselves or identifies themselves as a conservative turn around and go home, stay away from a politician tone that is an extraordinarily dangerous thing to do and a dumb thing to do, just like what he did on the steps of the supreme court was done. well, we you're exactly the people. i just want to know that the people that are on their way to chuck schumer's home, they are liberal activists. they are shouting no justice, no peace. my body, my choice. these are progressives. so i guess he's going to go there to cheer them on . lj, thank you . we'll be checking in with you throughout the night. here now with reaction, law professor fox news contributor jonathan turley is with us. i want to make sure from the legal perspective that the analysis that we're giving is is accurate. now there is an enumerated

right to keep and bear arms that would justify yesterday's decision on the second amendment. there is no enumerated right when it comes to the constitution, but our framers in their wisdom anticipated such conflicts or moments and hence we have the 10th amendment to a certain extent i would argue the ninth amendment that sends issues like this back to the state which seems appropriate in this case, which is why i've always felt that roe is bad law. your thoughts? >> well, you know, this is part of what the court was grappling with . people talk about roe v. wade as if it's an inviolate decision. in fact, roe v. wade itself was gutted that privacy based analysis that came out of the 1973 opinion was later removed in casey and there was a substitute which gave us the undue burdens standard. but roe was criticized by many liberal academics. i mean, people like laurence tribe called it a smokescreen.

as you saw ginsburg herself said it went too far . so this was an inviolate decision. it wasn't a decision that was widely accepted in terms of its analysis. there are arguments that can be made under the constitution for this privacy or equal protection or due process right . but the court clearly didn't see that and their argument was not that abortion should be unlawful. they're not saying anything about what should happen to abortion. they're saying more who should make that decision. and they said in the opinion that in 1973 they essentially stopped a political debate that was going on in the country and what they said today was have added have that debate, have thirty three thousand three hundred and thirty thousand million americans make the decision rather than nine justices and you're going to see a variation among the states most are likely to

protect the right to abortion. i'll remind you, by the way, sean, that in 1973, 30 states when roe was handed down prohibited abortion and all but the most limited exceptions. so the country has moved the issue. but this issue is now going to move back to the country and people will make this decision state by state. is it a fair statement to say that the odds are zero that abortion is going to be illegal in the united states knowing the current makeup of new york and new jersey and illinois and california and even knowing, for example, mississippi which which brought this before the supreme court, they just had a regulation state regulation of 15 weeks. is that a fair statement? yes. in fact, the majority of people in this country are virtually guaranteed to live in a state where abortion is not going to be unlawful. you're going to have states like california, new york ,

illinois that are obviously going to remain robustly protective states and then even states with the republican governors like like virginia today senator young said, look, i'd like to pursue mississippi like rule. and he says but i'm also willing to compromise. let's talk let's see what a reasonable compromise is. that was part of the vision that framers had for the federalism model is that with 50 states today working on problems, there's a chance you can come up with creative compromises out of all of that experimentation can become can come a resolution. and so i think that what you're going to see is you're going to have a number of states in the short term that are going to move on these trigger laws that are going to ban abortion except in very limited circumstances but in the majority for the majority of people in this country. the post roe world will not be dramatically different from the roe world in the sense

that they're living in states where that right will be protected. let me let me play for you chuck schumer on the steps of the supreme court and i want to get your thoughts on this. >> i want to tell you what i want to tell you. kavanaugh you have really legal whirlwind and you ride you know what to do, go forward with these awful decisions you've released a whirlwind. you will pay the price. you won't know what hit you. jonathan turley, you're a great lawyer. if that was me on the steps of the supreme court, why do i think there be consequences that i'd have to face as a result of saying something like that ? and i don't think you can get me. that was one that was one of the lowest points that i have witnessed in my lifetime in terms of the supreme court and how it is being treated to have and now senate majority leader making threats, calling

two justices by name really shocked all of us . and this is in an age of rage. you know, that people are addicted to rage and certainly senator schumer knows that . i don't think he was calling for violence, but what he was doing is reckless that there are people that hear those types of words and they take a much different meaning, very violent meaning. we saw that in front of justice kavanagh's house and today we're seeing the same failure of leadership as these politicians go out and say things that are not true . you know, vice president harris and speaker pelosi talking about how this opinion endangers things like a multiracial or interracial marriages and contraceptive protections. the court went to an extraordinary degree to swat down those arguments. i don't think i've ever seen an opinion where the court rippey tiddley returns to this issue

and says this is not going to endanger those rights and keeps on coming back and saying that it's saying that we are going to extend this opinion to things like marriage or contraception is simply untrue . there was only one justice who said that there might be grounds to reexamine these cases one the five other justices in the majority expressly said that is not going to be the case and yet that's being ignored. i had one law professor respond to me today and said, well, we just don't believe anything they say anyway. well then what's the point of legal analysis if you're just going to say that everything's a lie? that certainly makes our task rather easy. but it's not a lie. these justices made drew a very clear line. abortion in their view is unique and this does not extend to those rights. jonathan turley, great analysis. thank you as always. appreciate you being with us. also tonight , this ruling should not shock anyone in the country from the very beginning, donald trump vowed

to appoint pro-life constitutionalist judges to the supreme court and that's exactly what he did. promises made, promises kept. >> take a look. do you want to see the court overturn roe if we put another two or perhaps three justices on , that's really what's going to be that will happen and that'll happen automatically in my opinion, because i am putting pro-life justices on the court. i will say this it will go back to the states and the states will then make a determination here with more is former florida attorney general pam bondi outnumber co-host mcenany and fox news contributor tammy bruce. let me start, pam, with you if i can here , because what president trump what's interesting, he did something that i can't recall any presidential candidate doing is he gave a list of names that he would choose from for the high court and he followed through on that promise. so it was very transparent, just like joe biden, we would know would put a liberal justice on the court, probably

a judicial activist. >> correct? that's right. and sean promises made, promises kept just like you said, president trump did everything his policies for this country have remained great and they're trying to undo all of this . and look what he said has happened thanks to him putting these great justices on the bench. they're following the law, as jonathan turley said, it's going to go back to the states to make the decision and this is i'm so glad that we got to see this ruling in our lifetime. it's so important to our country and the law is being followed after 50 years. the constitution is being followed thanks to these justices and thanks to donald trump putting conservative justices on the bench, his policies have been incredible for our country and will continue to be . >> now let me let you if i can go to you, tammy. we've had all of these incidents of violence after

the draft opinion was released and you have this one particular group that we've been talking about, james revenge and they are urging their sympathizers, as i mentioned, to unleash a summer of rage across the country. now the leash is off. they said in a june 14th communique and it goes on to say from here forward any choice group who loses their door closes their doors and stops operating, they'll no longer be the target. but until you do, it is open season. we know where your operations are. the infrastructure of the enslavers will not survive . we will never stop back down, slow down or retreat. sounds like a threat of terrorism, tammy. yes, sure does. you know, the left really loves their drama, don't they ? they just love it. this is a marginal extremist group. they certainly don't speak for the majority of anyone. this is like antifa or

that group, the black box where you're looking at leftists who use important social issues to people to provoke chaos and havoc and violence because it's just a good excuse and they want, you know, a distraction. let's be honest here . the democrats are embarrassed as they should be there they are in their own party is dissolving effectively. they can't run the country. they've made the world a more dangerous place. the economy has been destroyed . they don't want women to be thinking about when they talk about personal freedom. how in god's name are you personally free when you don't feel safe sending your kids to school to walk to school because of drug dealers and crime in your neighborhood when you don't have gasoline to be able to drive if you had to go to a doctor that was out of town when you don't know what next week's paycheck is going to look like, what you're going to be able to afford, what you can feed your own children at night because there's no protein, there's no

food on the shelves, there's no baby formula and there talking about personal freedom for women and suburban moms and this is going to get to suburban moms all all jazzed up . the suburban moms are worried about tomorrow and their safety and feeding their children what they want to. this is the united states of america and this is what they think and the democrats will be wrong. they will overstep and this will not bode well for them. more riots and more violence over an issue as as at the dinner table and at the kitchen table. americ and families are still wondering how they're going to get through the next few weeks and next few months considering this economy and the condition of the world wars breaking out. it's an extraordinary environment now for these groups doing this violence may very well may do it. i'm wondering, sean, if if garland and the doj and the fbi are going to set up a task force for those people like they have against american

parents, going to school board meetings and speaking their minds? we've heard silence and the doj and the fbi and merrick garland need to step in and find these people and arrest them and have to tell you they probably know who they're who they're dealing with already and they've got to arrest them. these are terroristic threats to do nothing encourages it. let me ask you, kayleigh, since the release of the draft opinion, we've had dozens and dozens of pro-life centers and churches etc attacked you had the oregon right to life set ablaze with a molotov cocktail in wisconsin. the family action set on fire with molotov cocktails. these aren't just words. they may be a fringe group. we don't know a lot about them, but we do know that they've been attacking a lot of places already and this was just based on the draft ruling.

that's exactly right. there have been more than 40 attacks on pro-life centers and churches and these are grotesque attacks beheading statues in some cases complete vandalism and joy about it and the aftermath. you know, i talk to a lot of the heads of these pregnancy centers. i said to one last week that i've met out in bloomington, minnesota. i said i'm praying for you. i am worried for you. and the pro-life movement is strong. they show up, they put boots on the ground and peacefully tried to have their voices heard and indeed their voice has been heard in many states across the nation. but it is incumbent tammy's point upon the doj to actually prosecute this activity. that is not something we've seen thus far . we heard merrick garland come out with a statement today about protecting reproductive rights. well, what about protecting these pregnancy centers? what about protecting these churches? we know the person who is in charge of that division that goes after these entities . kristen clarke has in fact expressed her pro-choice views

in a past. so i certainly hope those views are not coloring the decision of the department of justice. if i could, sean, just quickly address aoc. you played that clip from her saying this is my body and i have a right to it. you do have a right to your body? aoc absolutely. you do not have a right to a body that is in your body that has i'm sitting here 17 weeks pregnant. i felt my baby moved before i came onto the air. this baby as a separate heartbeat, this baby as a separate dna. this baby has separate arms legs than me. i do not have a right to that body. i do have a right to mine but not to a separate body. and now you have states across the nation that will take that into consideration. we'll see how states come out. but there will be several states that now recognize a life. john is a life it's not a woman's right to choose. it's a baby's right to live personal something. yes. and i have to very quickly announce pelosi statement that this is the republicans plan on this nationalized

abortion ban. the action of the supreme court is actually the reverse that the supreme court, which is the one entity that could be with unelected people putting on an abortion ban across the country because that's what they want. apparently the court to do is to make nacion a law which the supreme court doesn't do. but by saying this does not belong with us, this belongs with the people and the state legislatures eliminates that specific threat of an unelected body imposing its views on the women of this country. that's why this should be embraced and women should take control of their states. whatever your beliefs are on and and embrace it and become more powerful, the democrats treat you like infants. they treat you like this is not the 21st century and that you're going to believe whatever they say to you in it's insulting and insane. and you get the last word tonight , sean.

it is insulting and people like maxine waters and people like corey bush who are out there inciting violence and lying about what this opinion is about. they know it. they know they're lying. corey bush is lying. she needs to be elected out of office. she needs to be kicked out of office in missouri because it's dangerous for our supreme court, for our pregnant see clinics who are counseling women on keeping their babies and for everyone out there. and so merrick garland go to ukraine, support ukraine. but right now he needs to be in our country making sure our justices are safe in their homes tonight because of bad politicians like corey bush and maxine waters and others. >> pam bondi. thank you , tammy. thank you , kelly . thank you . and also congratulations, kelly . that's news to me. no, we're all very happy for you and your family. congrats. here now with reaction, former counsel to president trump kellyanne conway along with america first legal founder steven miller as well as kelly. and we'll start with you.

this group wanting a summer of rage across the country. it's open season. we know where your operations are. you know, ever since the draft opinion was kellyanne, we have seen the doxing of supreme court justices homes. we now were able to thankfully uncover an assassination plot against justice cavanaugh. we now know that where amy coni barrett's kids go to school, we know where she goes to church. we know when she goes to church now that's irresponsible enough. those people should be held accountable. however, the white house had an opportunity to condemn that joe biden's white house and they didn't. why they do not. today was actually the first time we ever heard joe biden address violence as part of these protests at all. we've been waiting for him to say something in the two plus weeks since the assassin assassination attempt on justice cavanaugh and god forbid his wife and two young

daughters are living in that house. he only came out today and talked about it because senator joe biden is always in conflict with president joe biden. he is the combination of ignorance and arrogance when it comes to this opinion in almost every other issue. but i want to bring us back to a time that sets up how we got here . i was in the room many times with president elect candidate and president trump . we were discussing pro-life issues and i just want to say that without donald trump and mike pence and that administration, none of this would have happened. i know the left is saying that , but the right really needs to say this is part of the trump legacy. it certainly is the three supreme court justices. but in total, two hundred and thirty federal justices were put on the bench because they were nominated by donald trump , including sb54 at the circuit level. they paid the court level right below the united states supreme court. in private, donald trump always marveled that barack obama left him one hundred and twenty eight vacancies.

he literally couldn't believe it. and i have to agree. i know stephen was there as well. but time and time and again when it came to mexico city policy, when it came to protecting the sanctity of life. and i just want to say this to america. remember, for most of his adult life, this manhattan male billionaire real estate developer had been pro-choice. he changed his mind over a series of years. this a series of experiences that's very typical in our country. people do change their minds and i think today the opinion was the culmination of that as well. you see public opinion, religion and morality certainly gripped some people, but science medicine had made so many people stop and think, including sean. 47 of the 50 countries in europe have restrictions for 15 weeks. why is 15 weeks important? that's the dobs measure 15 weeks gestation. you know, a majority of americans agree with not having abortions starting in the second trimester. everybody's polls show that even if you agree with it at some level not starting the second is certainly not

the third trimester and that's why that's in part why roe was wrongly decided the supreme court finally spoke up. but i really wanted to give a little bit of the back story on how we got here because it's not ancient history. had hillary clinton put out our own list, has she been a better candidate? had she not told people the deplorable, irredeemable has she won that election? we wouldn't be here right now. let me go to steve miller. you know, jonathan turley i think summed it up really well. the justices are not saying whether it's right or wrong. they're just simply saying who should make the decision constitutionally. in other words, it's not an enumerated right in our constitution. therefore the 10th amendment ninth amendment to some extent puts it right back to the states. so that's all they decided today. all of these people for whatever reason, i think they really believe that abortion became illegal today and there are other people trying to monopolize eyes on this ruling and politicize it and being completely and utterly

dishonest and outright lying to people about what this ruling is actually about. today was a remarkable victory for dimmock, what joe biden is campaigning against in the midterms is democracy itself. the supreme court justices said who are we to decide this issue this belongs with american voters and each and every state and i will also just second that this ruling underscores why president trump's bond with the faith and values voters in this country is unbreakable and unshakable. but going to really want to go back to your point, sean, because it's so important roe v. wade 50 years ago took an issue away from the democratic process and said we the supreme court will decide abortion law for everyone. today the supreme court said no ,the american people, the american voter, the american representatives, you decide abortion rules and the overwhelming majority

of americans believe that they are not judges should decide abortion laws in this country and that's what today is all about. all right. steven miller, kellyanne conway, good to see you both, by the way. kellyanne, congrats. your book number one on the new york times list now pro-abortion demonstrator's have are taking these demonstrations are now taking place in multiple cities tonight , including in our nation's capital as we go to daily caller, reporter shelby callcott is back with us . shelby, great to have you. thanks for being with us. thanks, john . what's going on there? well, actually there were huge protests earlier tonight . a few thousand people. it's been pretty peaceful. there's been a lot of speeches. we're seeing a lot of chants. we're seeing some of the anti police rhetoric that we saw back during the 20 20 protests . but so far here in d.c. it has been peaceful. i will say that there was a large group of black black

who walked past and they're now marching around d.c. and typically this is the group we saw again back in 2020 that their rhetoric is a little bit more aggressive, sometimes a little bit more violent. and these are the groups that i think you have to watch out for as the night goes on . and so they're currently marching around d.c. but right now here in front of the supreme court, the protests are very calm. there's a group to my left who are just sort of chatting and chanting. but it is does seem to be dying down here in this direct area. all right, shelby, thank you for that report. joining us now from the site of a massive demonstration in new york city, lawrence jones is with us. lj, i did not understand. i couldn't hear you fully the last time you said liberal activists are actually marching to chuck schumer's house marching there. what for what purpose this exactly. well, they're just trying to get him to, i think, stand in solidarity with them before they actually end up taking a turn. they're on their way to

40 days. we're on 48 right now in madison, which you know is our world headquarters is on six avenue and forty eight. so we think they're actually changing their direction right now and heading to the studio. we're trying to get back in front of them. it's been mostly peaceful. so far , but again, still obscene comments. they want to replace the justices. they want to pack the court. they believe that beard is a part of the handmaid's tale. they have accused her of being a cult. they are upset with donald trump for appointing those three conservative justices and they say if they don't get what they want, that they want to pack the court. but it's clear to the democrats because they had no issues to run on when it comes to the economy, inflation, crime, the border that this has become their signature issue and the match that chuck schumer lived that day in front of the court where they're heading this way or they may be heading to fox news studio, which is right behind me sean. all right, l.j., stay safe.

thank you for that report. we'll get back to you throughout the hour. now, senator marco rubio, he's pushing back against joe biden's far left lunacy, introducing a bill to block biden from declaring federal emergencies on abortion. remember countries all across europe have very strict limits on abortion. for example, in germany it is only permitted up to 14 weeks and ukraine only permitted up to 12 weeks in poland only in cases of or. in france, only up to 16 weeks . there are some states in the us that have it up until the moment of birth. and by the way, who could ever forget former governor northam's comments? well, first the baby will be born will make the baby comfortable, then the doctor will talk to the mother and then make a decision anyway. here with reaction to all of tonight's big breaking news i think is i don't think we can emphasize enough, senator , tonight in light of protests and we know we saw in the summer of 2012 many of them spiral out of control.

we had dozens of dead americans and thousands of injured cops and billions in property damage. we don't want to go back to those days, but when you have big crowds, it's always dangerous. so i don't think we can emphasize enough abortion is not illegal. it's not been outlawed. the supreme court only decided who should make the decision. they decided based on our constitution that is a state's decision. correct. what we've seen over the last few hours is how unfortunately american political coverage has become childish and unserious and that's exactly what they're telling people. they make you think if you watch some of these tweets and you see some of this reporting, you think abortions and ban nothing has been banned. the only thing the supreme court did today is they said that under the constitution the people in the states have a right to decide via and through their elected representatives and each individual state whether they want to allow abortion prohibited or and how they want to regulate it. that was a decision that was made today and that's what we're talking about here .

now the reason why they're having this leftwing meltdown, there's two reasons why. the first is that as long as they had roe v. wade, they didn't have to worry about having that debate. they didn't have to go out there and have to argue and justify why they think, for example, that abortion should be taxpayer funded and legal up to the moment of birth. they didn't want to have to have that or didn't have to worry about having that argument. the second reason why they're melting down is because roe actually imposed a imposed a standard a law on the entire country without anybody be able to do anything about it. they love that situation that they're in . and the third is politics. i think actblue tonight announced they've raised eighteen million dollars off of this . the democrats think this is going to turn out a bunch of voters and help them forget what our incompetent presidency we're under. and so those are the three reasons here . but here's the irony is you're showing these images. we are seeing massive protests. los angeles, new york , d.c. these are liberal cities led by liberal leaders and liberal states that are never going to ban abortion. so they're going to tear down the potentially commit acts of violence in places where abortion will always be legal

as long as it's in the hands of the states because these are liberal places. that's the irony of all this and the fact that they're lying to people for political reasons. clearly they can't run on the economy, senator . clearly they can't run on how well they've done down at the border. they can't run on gas prices. they can't run on what they did in afghanistan or the war in europe or any other of the many failures that's on the list of joe biden's policies. right. so now this is what will run on guns abortion january six and republicans the usual playbook. they're racist, sexist, homophobic, blah, blah, blah. yeah, they can't run on saying to people that abortion is still tragically there were still abortions today that tragically will be abortions tomorrow because abortions not banned. they can't run on that. so they have to lie to people and say there was just a ruling that bans that are almost banned that that's what they're telling people when in fact the ruling today and this is what they can't run on is to tell people the supreme court

today ruled that you through your elected representatives in the state that you live will get to decide what you want the law to be about abortion that can't run on that. so they have to lie and tell people go out, take to the streets because they know what is the law in the state of florida. senator ? well, the legislature in florida passed a 15 week that meaning after the first 15 weeks and by the way, that consistent and in line with much of the countries of europe that poll after poll these guys love talking about polls. they're poll after poll after poll show the overwhelming majority of americans support a ban after 15 weeks. by the way, no to actually put out statistics that fully 55% of abortions today are done by pills in people's homes. i found that number to be very high. i looked elsewhere and it seems to be consistent with other other estimates. yeah. and all of these are tragic. okay, but the point being that that's what the law is

in florida. that's what law that that's what this case was about was the mississippi law that was being challenged and worked its way over to the court. but what these people don't want you to know and why they don't want to have these debates, what they don't want you to know is that in order to be accepted by these radical abortion groups, you have to be in favor of taxpayer funded abortion without restriction up until the moment of birth. that is the position you must take if you're going to get the support of these radical groups that are out there. they don't want you to know that . so they don't want the debate. my opponent running for senate democrats. she supports she doesn't want a debate on this raising a bunch of money off of it. they're trying to come after me here in florida. well, we need you back in that seat and i'm pretty sure the people of florida know how good a job you've done. we appreciate you being with us, senator . thank you . you know, bill clinton once famously said abortion should be legal and rare. and i think you can add the words early. my understanding according to the research we did that anywhere between one week and 12 weeks of pregnancy, it

can be done with the abortion pill anyway. now following for those people that choose to to have one that would be early legal rare, it's still legal in america, but following today's historic ruling, several states have already moved to codify the right to life. for example, abortion bans in arkansas, kentucky, louisiana, missouri, oklahoma, south dakota went into immediate effect after the decision and far left abortion groups, they are now issuing more threats against supreme court justices. now the group ruth sent us obviously haven't listened to ruth today, tweeted out the addresses of these six conservative justices urging their followers to meet at justice clarence thomas house to house here for reaction. harvard law professor alan dershowitz along with fox news legal analyst greg jerrett, professor, correct me if i'm wrong, 18 usc 15 07 is very clear . you can't intimidate harass a justice. i would argue large crowds

marching in front of their homes where they live with their families. >> that is harassment. that is intimidation. am i wrong? i think so. the courts will have to decide how to balance that against the first amendment. but i think the important point that a lot of people don't think that it's a necessary you know, that's extraordinarily dangerous. yeah, okay. i do. and i think it should never be done under any circumstances. but i do think the supreme court should never have had to reach beyond the 15 weeks. that's what was before the supreme court and everybody on this show seems to think that 15 weeks is reasonable. senator rubio, thanks. 15 weeks. the europeans think 15 weeks. why did the supreme court have to jump into this and say we're not going to decide a case before us , we're get a ban, we're going to ban roe versus wade, overrule it and allow states, allow states to be sure allow states to abolish abortion completely.

that was judicial activism, overreaching and showing you oppose judicial activism. you should join me and agree with justice roberts that judicial activism was at play here and it was unnecessary. i would take issue with it because i probably will not debate as effectively as one of your greater students, ted cruz, as you have said on many an occasion, but rights not enumerated specifically in the constitution like the right to keep and bear arms, which we discussed last night, would then go back then the 10th amendment ninth amendment, which would be applicable, would it not, professor, you could be right about all of that . but you wait until the right case comes up. wait until a case comes before the supreme court in which a state says no abortions and then the supreme court could have overrule over the issue weeks do it. now i understand where we go with what the state that's what the statute was.

that's what the mississippi statute that was before the court right. look, for forty nine long years, justices of the supreme court, sean, have struggled mightily to justify the decision. in 1973, roe versus wade that it's next to impossible to defend the indefensible. even the late ruth bader ginsburg expressed reservation about it. why? because there's nothing in the text of the structure, the meaning of the constitution that gives rise to this right to privacy for an abortion it is neither explicit nor is it implicit. but back in nineteen seventy three a different supreme court conjured up out of thin air this right to privacy was fundamentally back then. it was wrong back then and it's always incumbent upon the supreme court to reexamine cases to right of wrong. and as i pointed out in my column on fox news, more than

two hundred and thirty times the supreme court has reversed its own precedent. precedents are great until they're not. and yet nancy pelosi stood there today and said it's outrageous to overturn a precedent that stood for forty nine years. now it's it's not outrageous at all and you make great points. well, common is certainly done in landmark cases have been overturned by the supreme court. all those cases the supreme court waited until they had an actual case before it which raised the issue. this case, the mississippi case did not raise that issue would only raise the issue of whether 15 we may disagree but much better to decide that what's wrong with justice roberts, by the way, was there is nothing wrong with being proactive and examining the basis upon which the case is being relaxium i'm going to

have to leave there, but we will have you back . i'm sure we'll be discussing more of this on monday. joining us now with reaction, congressman ronnie jackson along with colorado congresswoman lauren bobert is with us. congresswoman, your take on today's ruling from the supreme court? well, first of all, sean, i am absolutely overjoyed at this decision. but here's the irony tonight we are bracing for democrat cities vandalized by democrat voters and democrat states where their abortion laws won't be affected by today's ruling. and of course, we're hearing that abortions are already being canceled in states like louisiana, texas, kentucky, missouri, and arkansas. and that means that saves lives are being saved as we speak. but let's make this crystal clear as you've been doing tonight on the show to the american people today did not outlaw abortion in return. this issue of what protects the unborn should receive back to the states and the democratic process. and i'm proud to say that because of this decision,

america, american babies that would have died today will get to live a full and blessed life here in america. let me let me get your take dr. ronnie jackson and also your reaction to the fact that a large percentage of abortions today are early and taken with a pill. you see all these protesters holding up coathangers and talking about back alley abortions, et cetera. that's not the case in the majority of abortions, is it? >> not? >> absolutely not true . but you know, they want you to think that because they're trying to use this to drive the next election cycle, it's really all they've got to hang their hat on right now. i'm overjoyed at what happened today. so we're all the people in the state of texas. certainly those people in my district up in north texas were very excited about what happened today. we're glad that we had justices that had the courage to step in to defend the unborn and this movement is become disgusting and it really has evolved from a movement over the last few decades that used to be about supposedly a woman's choice

into a movement. now that absolutely celebrates the murder of a child in the. and it's just it's just gone too far and i'm very, very happy with what happened today and i hope that we continue to overturn abortion in every state in the country 15 , 20 seconds. congressman, what is the law in your state? colorado shown here ? it's pretty terrible. they just codified full term abortions here in our state. this is something that's been going on for a very long time and unfortunately this will probably be a safe haven for sitting here until the day before or a couple of hours before giving birth. you can perform an abortion legally in colorado. yes, the mother could be in labor and decide to terminate that pregnancy and they would what's called an declaration. all right. thank you both. we'll have more hanadi coming up straight ahead. stay with us.

hey, everyone. i'm mike huckabee, former governor of arkansas, part time musician but longtime customer of relaxium. and i'm here with my good friend and country music legend larry gatlin. now, larry, a few months ago you asked me huck, does that relaxium really work? i remember that because i was tired of not sleeping. i took it you were to try to guess what relaxium sleep works. larry, so many americans are struggling to get the sleep sleep for me four years has been kind of a concept. i've heard people talk about relaxium sleep has changed my life. i'm grateful to you and it has been a blessing our family i am now a paying customer. i love it when you call me and tell me that it works

in the very first night for you and it is work every night since this call today for your 30 a risk free trial and one hundred percent money back guaranteed relaxium doesn't need a prescription is 100% drug free and it's not habit-forming relaxium thing work for the very first night as a nurse is very important relaxium really helps me stay focused and also do my job is to develop a renowned neurologist and sleep expert, dr eric ciliberti relaxium leaves triple action formula was designed to regulate your natural sleep cycle, relax your body and calm the mind for better sleep through the night. it's also not habit forming and made in the usa. take it from larry gatlin and make if you're having trouble sleeping quit having trouble get some sleep with relaxium sleep call right now call now relaxium sleep is giving away 1000 bottles. call and get your very own risk free bottle of relaxium sleep now fall asleep faster and stay asleep longer and wake up feeling refreshed with relaxium

sleep call 806 one three sb54 sixty two 806 one three fifty four sixty two royan darby retired then head to the face of the market. they contacted their personal capital adviser and checked a free retirement plan. now they feel confident and no longer worry about what the market may bring start today and personal capital .com . hey fellows, we've got stock. it's about your food. it has spray on the leaf and powdered me. it's time for fresh fruit that belongs in the fridge next hour now who's hungry for that ? so i'm going to talk to kim and it's time to start using funky new maximum strength. um, you know, it's so powerful cause and prevents fungal infection plus it has aloe and tea tree oil to restore skin health, say good bye to toe fungus with fungimap. don't we know one thing and one thing that i'm spraying back ?

we can talk to people about doing your favorite. you know, quarterbacks go to the experts back vaccine relief for more than one hundred yards available store near you a heart attack giving out life insurance. no, but we have life insurance, john . i'm trying to find something we can afford. fortunately in only a few minutes select put down john a five hundred thousand dollar policy for only twenty dollars a month and his wife and a five hundred thousand dollar policy for only twenty one dollars a month. go to select post.com now and get insurance your family needs at a price you can afford post we shop. you say the pro-life stories about who we are as a nation inside the history, the culture, its opponents and the decades long fight against abortion overturning roe the powerful new special screening now only on fox station. it's important that when you are out this weekend you talk

to people and they say they took away our right to abortion. you can tell them the truth. that's not what today's decision did. they decided who gets to decide and the constitution is clear . it's the states all the time we have left this evening. thanks for being with us. thank you for making the show possible. stay with the fox news channel for continuing coverage, not your heartbeat troubled laura's next . we'll see on monday. i'm laura ingram and this is ingraham angle on a triumphant friday night from new york answered prayers. >> that's the focus of tonight's angle on january 22nd . nineteen seventy three almost fifty years ago, seven members of the supreme held that under the fourteenth amendment of our constitution the same constitute that americans and fought and died to protect elected officials could not protect the unborn from abortion. now ever since that