us online or on the podcast good night from south carolina. life liberty and the vendors up next one —- "life, liberty & levin" is up next. mark: hello america i am mark levin this is "life, liberty & levin" in this an inch and a half thick is that opinion and dissent of the supreme court decision of the gods case that has received so much attention and isn't it amazing as soon

as the decision was issued that people were giving their opinions? you know they did not read it. you know nancy pelosi did not read this. yet she came out and made a poisonous statement filled with lies intended to provoke because the democratic party has had an entire plan of e-mails, get out the vote, grassroots operations, protest, many on commercials. you see that play out in anticipation of this decision that was leaked from a liberal clerk on the supreme court that i would argue. and incredibly important decision. why? because it is a constitutional decision that recognizes a court and accepts the fact it is not all-powerful. one of the great things about press washington lies he decided he would not be king. he could have been. he said no.

i will follow the constitution. the activist on the court who lobby the court to basically turn the supreme court into a super left-wing legislature as a backstop to congress and the president and the bureaucracy. even if the left loses elections it cannot lose the issue and that's what's going on. let's start at the beginning. teefifteen on —- roe vs wade reversed almost 200 years of jurisprudence. almost 200 years there is not one word in this constitution, not one about abortion. not a word in the federalist papers about abortion. not any word of abortion during the constitutional convention in madison notes. so that had nothing to do with the decision of roe vs wade. roe vs wade was a long op-ed a decision looking for constitutional argument. they never found it.

there is none. in his decision, harry blackmun one of the dumbest members of the court in the last 100 years said prior justices have looked at the first amendment, fourth, fifth amendment they looked at the night amendment, 14th wherever we look in whatever the justification and then he says roe vs wade it is a fundamental privacy right. but stick with me. there were limitations. the trimesters, the third trimester the science at the time for sure but the third trimester the state had an absolute interest in regulating or ban abortion. that case was overturned.

roe vs wade was already overturned by a subsequent decision called casey. the supreme court went even further and basically allowed without getting in the weeds, abortion on demand if the state decided there would be abortion on demand. when the first draft was leaked in february, chuck schumer into the senate floor to put up a vote he knew would lose. what did the democrats propose? not to reinstate roe vs wade but a bill to allow abortion up to the last second of birth throughout the country. blowing away every restriction that exist in virtually two thirds of the states. this is a party that supports abortion, the most extreme kind, infanticide up to the last second.

when you do partial-birth abortion, just as a reminder, i will not show the graphics, they take a very big needle, syringe, stick it into the soft spot of the top of the head of the baby, drain the brain out, turn the baby around, now dead and pull it out by its feet. that baby suffered horrifically. if we follow the science, that is a baby. we know the baby feels pain. if we follow the science, roe vs wade would have died with its own weight because viability as roe vs wade argued is more than the last three months as technology continues to expand. it would be the last two trimesters. so roe vs wade cannot stand within its own weight. the supreme court probably expanded it. overturning roe vs wade. the court says clearly this is only about abortion.

over and over again. it's not about contraception. it's not about marriage. it's not about those issues. so nancy pelosi who did not read the opinion, came out immediately after the decision was released on friday and said it is about contraception. why? because most americans do not believe in extremist positions on abortion up to the last second like nancy pelosi does. like chuck schumer does. like the democrat party does. this party stands for infanticide. so she has to try to expand it so she wants to upset gay people, those who never contemplate abortion, those who use contraception, it has nothing to do with any of it. not just because the court said it but the rationale does not include it. abortion can be expanded in

certain states under this ruling. this was a very moderate ruling. they basically said we don't have power. how many times have we heard institution say that? we don't have power here. it's up to the states. you figure it out and you handle it. which means you could have more lenient radical abortion laws that expand on existing lies in states depending on who selected. abortion until the last second unfortunately from my perspective is not only permitted that can be added in different states. now lower federal court judges cannot overturn decisions by the people's representatives in the state legislators. there's 1000 federal judges summer radical leftists. we have seen them and watch them. they are flesh and blood. lawyers in black robes.

and is not up to them anymore to make these decisions. it is up to you to make these decisions. it is quite a moderate decision. this court could have held of an activist mindset of a different perspective that that is a baby. from the position of the court and the science it is a baby a woman is carrying and they could have said from there we will invoke the 14th amendment equal protection clause to protect a second human being involved in the issue, the baby. therefore abortion is unconstitutional. theoretically they could have made that decision. but it did not. they said we don't have any power. look at the tenth amendment. things that are not granted the federal government even at

some point we have to accept the fact that our constitution is a brilliant document. we don't have to accept the radical left agenda coming out of law school or newsrooms or the democratic party. this is united states of america with a rule of law not the united states of america of the democratic party they ruled no matter what. they could have taken the last trimester and expanded it. they did not. they could have said it is equal protection issue. new york and california and those states which is pretty close to infanticide will continue. you will see abortion states popping up all over the place because they are obsessed with this issue. the democratic party has exploited this issue for political gain. you hear the mouthpieces like policy and biden talk about one and now they can define what a woman is.

while destroying women's sports and identification their executive orders and regulations but now they represent all women. do all women support abortion on demand? do all women support partial-birth abortion up until the last second? is every person in every state support the laws in new york and california that are so radical and so extreme that they only apply to nations like north korea and communist china? is that with the women in this country believe? why we have documentary showing what partial-birth abortion looks like they are talking upright until the last second. but for the republicans out of west virginia they would have gotten it. ruth bader ginsburg has been

quoted before. i don't quote her because she is a sage but she was a radical leftist and said more than once in 1992 law review or she was interviewed, roe vs wade "call that a political process moving in a reform direction and thereby prolong divisiveness when stable settlement of the issue. that's not the first time the court has done that. in dred scott an activist court basically upheld slavery. it took us civil war to undo that decision with over 700,000 casualties. plessy versus ferguson. the advocates for roe vs wade really are not advocates for roe vs wade but there advocates for partial-birth abortion and up until the last second. infanticide. it took over half a century to overturn everybody is separate but equal in the plessy versus

ferguson case and what about brown versus education the supreme court ruled where japanese americans and those of japanese descent, 120,000 were uprooted from homes and businesses and moved to internment camps. businesses were taken from them. that was an unconstitutional decision. ronald reagan addressed that specifically with reparations from the property of those that were still alive for their children. the constitution wins for once. it is a grand day when the democratic party tries to destroy the court, the court stored on —- stood firm. if you read the dissent it is another long op-ed. it is an editorial. there is no constitutional basis for what they wanted to do. sadly, when you read chief

justice roberts decision it demonstrates he is basically a rhino on the supreme court let's uphold the mississippi legislation but do we really have to go all the way? all the way? to do what? those five justices three appointed by donald trump said we do not have this power. how often have you heard an institution of the federal government say that? they should be celebrated rather than threatened. rather than have an assassination attempt on one of the justices. rather than beef up security to put riot fences around the supreme court. the same pelosi pushing radical violent agenda who set up the january 6 committee dragging the country through that. we have to think for upholding the constitution? who do we have to think?

the man they hate former president trump. donald trump was not immersed in this issue before he was elected president that made a promise. put justices on the supreme court he believed would uphold the constitution especially in this respect. that's what they did. all three of them. but for the trump presidency this would not have happened. this is why he deserves far more appreciation than he gets. this is why, among other reasons he is hated and attested by the opposition to the constitution and civilization that want to see him imprisoned. never forget that. when i come back we have to guess. mike pompeo talking about communist china and former us attorney and we will continue

this discussion on the supreme court's decision with this case and others. i will be right back. (mom allen) verizon just gave us all a brand new iphone 13. (dad allen) we've been customers for years. (dad brown) i thought new phones were for new customers? we got iphone 13s, too. switched to verizon two minutes ago. (mom brown) ours were busted and we still got a shiny new one. (boy brown) check it out! (dad allen) so, wait. everybody gets the same great deal? (mom allen) i think that's the point. (vo) now everyone can get a new iphone 13 on us on america's most reliable 5g network. (allen kid) can i have a phone? (vo) for every customer. current, new, everyone. to show the love. people with plaque psoriasis, are rethinking the choices they make.

like the shot they take. the memories they create. or the spin they initiate. otezla. it's a choice you can make. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, you can achieve clearer skin. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. otezla can cause serious allergic reactions. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you.

mark: welcome back, america

it's great to have former secretary of state cia chief mike pompeo with us. although he is box did in many people's minds on foreign policy has a breadth of knowledge when it comes to domestic policy and the law. i would be remiss if i did not ask you of the supreme court decision. >> it is a good decision because it is deeply grounded in our constitution and in america's founding and history. it will protect more human lives and return this debate to the states where it was for 150 years. it should be proud of that decision today because the court got it right i everybody is talking to the constitution that recognizes this decision gave power back to the states. they did not pull into the court and let it be where it

should be that was a remarkable decision from 1973. mark: how often do you see institutions say we don't have power? we don't have the authority. give it back to the people. i have never seen that before. >> if it is happened before we will have to look pretty hard. the only thing it seemed kind of like that is a sad example were some members of congress a they didn't have power that actually had because they didn't want to take responsibility for their actions than they said we will let the court sort it out. this is the reverse of that. they got the institutional power right they honor the founders in the nation and judeo-christian heritage. at the same time the opportunity for those of us who believe each one of these babies is precious and to make that case to the american people. mark: secretary pompeo, it is my contention that i could be

wrong but writing the how china is building up the military we are flatlining in this regard, my concern is china is preparing for war and we are preparing for nothing. what you make of this? >> that's true. and in some places i think it's worse than that. we are moving backward to diversity and inclusion moving to the top of the national security interest climate change at the top of that protecting without resorting to the use of military power. we got deterrence right in the classic model of peace through strength through the eighties

and early nineties that historic precedent that america has walked away from under republicans and democrats alike sending the 82nd airborne study using the real power of america. the threat from the chinese communist party is even greater than the soviet union to fight in ukraine today is connected to that deeply. our economic interests as a machine shop worker in wichita kansas, these things impact you. we have to get this right to protect our nation and to make sure we have the opportunity to be prosperous the way we have the last couple of years. mark: a president who doesn't rally the nation or work with congress to build up our military and the congress is trying. congress is on the move and less you are an ostrich with your head in the sand whether west africa or the solomon

islands, panama canal , south china sea they have an iron fist on right now preparing to invade taiwan and they destroyed hong kong. putting a lot of resources into a lot of countries to take their ports if they can, threatening vietnam, philippines, south korea, japan. what is it about this administration? are they that stupid? >> president obama talked about pivoting to asia and did nothing in this president says they are back when it comes back to challenging the chinese communist party. first, you have a president who is unwilling to use the power that america has our economic might. you went through a list of things across the world like ports that is true.

don't forget the decimation inflicted on the world because of the wuhan virus and also aliens of dollars stolen by the chinese communist party here at home and millions of american jobs. this administration does not see that partly because of climate change folks who put that is their top priority the first one to meet from president xi was not secretary blinking or austin or president biden the former secretary of state john kerry was sent to beijing to say this is what america demands not something that remotely gives him any heartburn july 2 john kerry. also with a lot of greedy companies making a lot of money working alongside the chinese communist party today whether hollywood, technology companies, financial institutions working ways that

are deeply detrimental and the biden administration is allowing them to do that in ways that they have to know from ordinary americans. mark: i remember a day when corporations were patriotic. i remember a day when athletes would leave their positions on a team to join the united states military. today they trash the country. they make a fortune with the sneakers or jerseys the same with corporations like apple, coca-cola. when we come back, if we were to have a confrontation with china in the next several weeks, who would win? we will be right back. (children giggling) hey, i was, uh, thinking about going back to school to get my masters. i just saw something that said you could do it in a year for, like, $11k.

hmm. barista: order eleven! yeah, see you at 11. 1111 masters boulevard, please. gonna be eleven even, buddy. really? the clues are all around us! some things are too obvious to be a coincidence. your heart is at the heart of everything you do. and if you have heart failure, there's entresto. entresto helps improve your heart's ability to pump blood to the body. don't take entresto if pregnant; it can cause harm or death to an unborn baby. don't take entresto with an ace inhibitor or aliskiren, or if you've had angioedema with an ace or arb. the most serious side effects are angioedema, low blood pressure, kidney problems, or high blood potassium. ask your doctor about entresto.

>> and to foxnews life. legal observers told the supreme court's overturn of t9 is the tip of the iceberg. the decisions make include rulings on matters of immigration and environmental reduction and could come down as soon as this week abortion rates triggered a number of protest this weekend most of them are peaceful.

calling for the first time in nine weeks falling by four cents the last two weeks but still sitting $5.5 a gallon it still $1.90 higher than one year ago. now back to "life, liberty & levin". t11 "life, liberty & levin". mark: welcome back, america we are with former secretary of state pompeo a fantastically successful secretary of state. china versus the united states who would win? >> we would win but unfortunately if we asked that in five or ten years from now when we follow the same policy of weakness the biden administration is putting forth am not confident i can answer the same way.

the struggle with it just military and schiff said tanks, this is part economically i would argue they have already been at war with american people economically for two decades but we took it and turned the other cheek allowing companies to make a lot of money now also cyberand space. today we would prevail that this is not a given the chinese come his party is intent to make sure the next secretary of state will answer that question differently and everything turns on american leadership. if we are prepared to do the things we must do to protect and defend america the way president reagan did in the eighties we have to do in the 2020 is to protect and preserve american prosperity. mark: could be a real situation be bungled worse than it has under joe biden? taking trumps policies turning them inside out, i ran on the

run people hate their so-called leadership and now they are at ground zero with nuclear weapon. >> what works what is what happened in afghanistan leaving americans left behind that signaled that america was we can no longer prepared to do the basic things we have always done to protect our own. ran is a perfect example we have isolated them like never before the biden team ripped up the accord and now the middle east people will not take our phone calls and they have a doubt if we will really support them if they have to do something difficult bad for israel, bad for the gulf and bad for the goal states and all they had to do was continue the policy we had the iranian leadership.

we had given a lot of power to the iranian people and they threw it all away. mark: looking at foreign-policy, do see anything this administration is doing right? where can we go in the world today? is it any ideological thing or confidence issue quick. >> i have been surprised by that these are professional government people my that they would have policies executed but i cannot think of a nation that respects a smart or someone that fears is less than just 18 months ago that is not political it's about america and my kids and grandkids praying they figure this out to put ideology and climate change at the top of the list and have executed so poorly and marines around the

world are at-risk and that breaks my heart. mark: gas and diesel fuel prices going through the roof and potential shortages. doesn't that have an incredibly negative impact on the united states military? >> of course the president said he would move to make all equipment move on green energy? that is unfounded. we talk about the party of science. sign me up for that. we will continue to use fossil fuels and the fact they are twice as expensive or three times expensive means fewer training hours for the young soldier or marine to train or be prepared to put some at risk and not having american energy produced here, we have to ask a knucklehead in venezuela or a russian for energy that is risky for our

military as well. mark: thank you for your service your military service all the way up to secretary of state. thank you for the clarity of your voice then thank you for being a loyal gentleman. you haven't written a tell-all book. god bless you. we appreciate it. >> have a great day

up to 8 weeks of relief with cytopoint. that's a lot more fun time, right max? yup. it's life-changing time. ♪ ♪ cytopoint is a long-lasting treatment for allergic dermatitis. just one injection given by your veterinarian can control allergic itch for 4-8 weeks. it's life-changing itch relief that brings back the fun in life, day after day. now's the time to ask your veterinarian for cytopoint.

mark: welcome back, america. we have a wonderful guest a former united states attorney from utah, former federal prosecutor, but a good one. we have a lot of former prosecutors any talk and do not know what they are talking about that you do. brett, first things first, the decision coming out of the

supreme court school choice, second amendment of the bill of rights, abortion , don't we see now a working majority on the court that the leaves in complying with the constitution and leaving all the rest to the other states and the people? isn't that exactly what the framers intended quick. >> it is and it is so overdue we became accustomed as a country not having a supreme court that guided us in a fashion that was steady and consistent with the underpinnings of the constitution. the intention of the framers was so substantial to what the government would grant or not grant for purposes of rights. looking at the decisions coming out and for the first time in my lifetime i see the

supreme court is raining in the activism. that should give a lot of comfort. i know the country is divided that raining in the activism is something we all hoped would happen at some point. mark: it is amazing to watch the critics. they have no sensible arguments on the one hand they want an activist court on the other hand they don't. if the court ruled abortion is unconstitutional under the equal protection clause they would not have liked that that the end justifies the means and if they win elections they will push the agenda if they lose they will push the agenda then there permanent bureaucracy and power all the time. >> i was stunned by the president's comments after the decision to quote him, he

indicated this decision was inconsistent with common sense and the constitution. that is the exact opposite of what the court has done in this decision and other decisions and have ruled consistent and for the president of the united states to be driven so angrily by politics no longer giving deference to the supreme court what the constitution says and what it doesn't say is a remarkable time we live in. putting out statement such as the supreme court has taken away constitutional right but they never granted a right to abortion and ironically they did grant a right to possess firearms. we have upside down analysis and it is as poorly done as

the president of the united states. >> we get the lectures from the democratic party in the january 6 committee who wave around the constitution and talk about donald trump and what took place and that he tried to undermine and election to conducted two and the rest but the very presentation and the process was the most anticonstitutional process i have seen in public know exculpatory evidence, no country witnesses no republicans on the committee who are actually republicans and now they have potential criminal charges hanging over their heads so meanwhile they talk about defending democracy and the system.

what do you make of this quick. >> as a trial lawyer the case that the democrats like liz cheney were putting on can you imagine the judge would hold them in contempt for manipulating evidence and refusing to have a fair assessment of the evidence that they have we have sanctions, we have contempt of court and the case would be thrown out but not in the court of political ideology. but they cannot win on the merits of the argument i keep saying it would love for someone on the left to sit down with me and give me the arguments that they have in all the areas that you have outlined that are based in fact and the law that they

cannot so they resort to media and distortion and manipulation and we have to sit back and watch as though there is credibility. i don't find credibility to any argument they are currently pursuing. mark: with the members on the january 6 committee who are demanding we pack the supreme court attacking the reputation of the court who is demanding the senate get rid of the filibuster so they can control the outcome of the decisions on the court, members of this committee support the lawlessness on the border and do not support a president who is supposed to be enforcing the law under the constitution i could go on and on who basically cheered on the riots in 2020 now we have to listen to them go line painfully about the constitution and democracy as they run a

stalinist show trial with the holocaust and the "washington post" which also covered up the holocaust we have to take moral lessons from these people. i have a question when we return. we know the justice department getting information they have gathered by violating the bill of rights. what do you make of that? what do you make of that? we will be right back. we have to be able to repair the enamel on a daily basis. with pronamel repair toothpaste, we can help actively repair enamel in its weakened state. it's innovative. my go to toothpaste is going to be pronamel repair.

hi. we're zerowater. and we believe everyone deserves my go to toothpaste the purest tasting water. that's why we strive for zero. you see, to some it means nothing. but to us, it means everything. here, take a look. this meter showing triple zeros means our five-stage filter did its job, and that virtually all dissolved solids or tds have been removed. and all that's left is the purest tasting water. let's compare. a two-stage brita filter stops here. but our five-stage filter doesn't quit. zerowater. we strive for zero.

after my car accident, i wondered what my case was worth. so i called the barnes firm. when that car hit my motorcycle, insurance wasn't fair. so i called the barnes firm. it was the best call i could've made. atat t bararnefirmrm, our r inry a attneysys wk hahard i could've made. atat t bararnefirmrm, to get you the best result possible. call us now and find out what your case could be worth. you u mit bebe sprisised ♪ the barnes firm injury attorneys ♪ ♪ call one eight hundred, eight million ♪ i was injured in a car crash. injury attorneys ♪ ♪ cai had no idea how much my case was worth.llion ♪ i called the barnes firm. when a truck hit my son, i had so many questions about his case. i called the barnes firm. it was the best call i could've made. your case is often worth more than insuran

call the barnes firm to find out i could've made. what your case could be worth. we will help get you the best result possible. ♪ the barnes firm, injury attorneys ♪ call one eight hundred,est resul eight million ♪ mark: i have had discussions with our dershowitz and others and we are so thoroughly disgusted with the january 6 committee and legal analyst and others have their say but today we learn nothing because nothing may have that has been challenged by anybody. not even in the media or most legal analyst. but now we have a justice department that obviously has a grand jury issuing attend the subpoenas in

arizona, nevada, pennsylvania on the issue of obstructing an election. former senior justice department official took out the electric devices out of his home in the middle of the morning made them stand in the street in his pajamas. they don't treat criminals this way typically. they don't treat democrats this way you saw peter navarro. they put him in leg irons and handcuffs. what is going on? >> for the party was scheme for the attorney general to be independent and consistent, we have mary garland who is either a puppet or a very dangerous man at the helm of the department of justice. either way is unacceptable. we see inconsistent treatment of political opponents and for the first time in my career, i have spent over a decade as a federal prosecutor and have fond memories and pride of the work that we did that is not the same justice department

, not the same fbi. these are individuals driven by politics and agenda and they do it blatantly. and they are doing it that way because they cannot win on their merits so they use doj as an arm of the executive agenda so with the january 6 committee gathering evidence and manipulating that evidence and it is very clear to give any with that narrative without department of justice from 15 years ago and that will now take it seriously. mark: that's an important point the january 6 committee they are not investigating january 6 what did nancy pelosi do when it came to securing the building? one of the members talks about

we want to get rid of the electoral college. they have a massive agenda. every member had to be approved by policy and they are investigating the republican party and conservatives who supported trump in the various states stretching the definition of obstruction in ways we never heard of before. to leah criminal predicate to indict the former president of the united states. what do you make of that? >> that commission as they call it is shocking when you compared to the most recent 9/11 commission a bipartisan commission willing to criticize both the clinton and bush administration for failings of national security. they criticize the fbi. they pointed out what was done well and what was not. it was something the american public had some confidence at

least we will get out on —- answers. with january 6 we don't know who the people are or who put down the pipe bombs or what orders nancy pelosi gave the white appears she refused to build up security on the recommendations of capital police. we don't have answers to any of those that would really tell us what happened on january 6 and why it was a monumental failing. mark: why you just investigating republicans at the election what about the lawyers to change election my write up on election day? what about the state democrat officials, governors, secretary of state, board of election and elected supreme court in pennsylvania that change election law in violation of article two of the federal constitution? why is no evidence presented? the answer is exactly what you said. they don't want to know

because the end justifies the means. thank you for your courage in speaking out and your past service. >> thank you. >> thank you. mark: we will be right people with plaque psoriasis, are rethinking the choices they make. like the shot they take. the memories they create. or the spin they initiate. otezla. it's a choice you can make. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, you can achieve clearer skin. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. otezla can cause serious allergic reactions. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. (mom allen) verizon just gave us all a brand new iphone 13. otezla. show more of you.

(dad allen) we've been customers for years. (dad brown) i thought new phones were for new customers? we got iphone 13s, too. switched to verizon two minutes ago. (mom brown) ours were busted and we still got a shiny new one. (boy brown) check it out! (dad allen) so, wait. everybody gets the same great deal? (mom allen) i think that's the point. (vo) now everyone can get a new iphone 13 on us on america's most reliable 5g network. (allen kid) can i have a phone? (vo) for every customer. current, new, everyone. to show the love. if you've been living with heart disease, reducing cholesterol can be hard, even when you're taking a statin and being active. but you can do hard. you lived through thirty-seven red-eye flights... in a middle seat. eleven miracle diets...

forty-two college campus tours... four overseas postings... one minor stroke... and four citywide blackouts... and with leqvio, you can lower your cholesterol, too. when taken with a statin, leqvio is proven to lower bad cholesterol by over 50% and keep it there with two doses a year. common side effects of leqvio were injection site reaction, joint pain, urinary tract infection, diarrhea, chest cold, pain in legs or arms, and shortness of breath. with leqvio, lowering cholesterol becomes just one more thing life throws your way. ask your doctor if leqvio is right for you. lower. longer. leqvio. - chris domine is a husband, father, and athlete-- even an ironman. but 10 years ago, chris' kidneys were failing. - the doctor said, "if you don't do dialysis, "if you don't get a kidney transplant, you are going to die." - then chris received a second chance

made possible by an organ donor. - your well-being changes from loss of hope to better times ahead. - imagine what you could make possible. learn more and sign up as an organ, eye, and tissue donor. go to organdonor.gov. ♪ ♪ >> welcome back america i want to thank the five justices on the supreme court who have done their duty faithfully executed the responsibilities under enormous political and even criminal threat and the failure of the democrat party and the department of justice to defend them in word and action. i'm going to close tonight's program with ronald reagan famous quote which is in the last paragraph of liberty in tierney. freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. we pass it to her children in the bloodstream, it must be

fought for, protected and handed on for them to be the same. one day we will stand our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the united states when men were free. i couldn't say it better. see you next liberty and levin". steve: breaking tonight president biden joined other world leaders on the first day of the g7 summit in germany where they committed to ban imports and russian gold and green infrastructure thing but nothing to help you with soaring inflation and gas prices today. on the plus side, so far biden has it fallen off the bike, he hasn't fallen up any stairs, he hasn't even fallen asleep.