>> tucker: we will be coming back from brazil. we had an amazing conversation. we will be back tomorrow night. see you then. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> hannity: welcome to "hannity" we start with a fox news alert we have a lot of loot new news for you tonight on this program we have long detailed the hyperpartisan illegitimate nature of this sham january 6th committee now ongoing in the d.c. swamp but over the fast past 48 hours this charade has been exposed for all to see. after yesterday's ludicrous testimony no one in their right mind should take this committee seriously it has been apparent from day one this committee always had a predetermined

outcome in every single person on the committee we all know voted to impeach donald trump. it's so unethical that the members of the committee they should be ashamed of themselves we all know that they have no shame. nor do their cheerleaders know the media mob they are completely shameless. together they have lied to this country about the donald trump and russia collusion they ignored her dirty russian dossier. they ignore abuse and hunter biden's laptop just weeks before the 2020 election. that could've been relevant and it could've had an impact on election with the russia disinformation they made it up they turned out to be true. they ignored -- holding out a billions of taxpayer dollars was a fire to prosecutor investigating the

experience on making millions in ukraine. they ignored his lies about never one time talk to hunter about his foreign business dealings now we have a form called from 2018 he was denying ever talking to him about it all through 2020. the media mob they echo every lie of the democratic party and they protect the democrats at all costs at all times. number they told us yesterday this was an emergency hearing we have shocking game changing new information brought forward by a white house staffer in cassie hutchinson. that was not true this was not an emergency hearing at all this was not breaking new information in fact the committee actually we discovered interviewed ms. hutchinson on tape on four separate occasions prior to the testimony now they have known about her claims for months but apparently never got around to cooperating any of them which is pretty weird because her claims we now have discovered her

hearsay claims like for example her wild story about donald trump physically assaulting two secret service agents while trying to commandeer the presidential limo, the beast as they call it and drive it to the capital himself. tonight were learning that the committee never even one time reached out and did their due diligence to the secret service to ever verify that far-fetched claim and other two agents involved there forced to testify under oath that the story told yesterday is not true and never happen. none of that matters the committee member take a look. >> have you cooperated with other witnesses that donald trump grabbed the steering wheel and got into an altercation with an agent? >> it's an entirely credible witness she testified under oath in front of the entire country.

everyone was able to judge her demeanor she has no motivation or interest in line in any way as to what we have in the other end some anonymously sourced rumors of dealings of particular agents. anyone who wants to testify can come forward and testify under oath about what happened all were interested in is the truth. >> hannity: the ding corroborate the story at all and didn't seem to care. she does in fact have a motivation to smear donald trump because we can break news tonight according to two separate sources that i've now spoken to. they should've been disclosed yesterday. hutchinson was desperate to work for then soon to be former president trump and we have confirmed that she did work for donald trump after the election in his post-presidential washington, d.c., office for several months.

from january 21st to april 9th 2021. keep in mind that's well after january 62021, but now suddenly she is so deeply impacted by january 6th she had to speak out okay. now about her story about donald trump assaulting a secret service is not the only part of her testimony that's under scrutiny. there's also serious questions but a letter presented as evidence during yesterday's testimony you might've remembered take a look. >> can you look at the exhibit that we are showing on the screen now. have you seen the snow before? >> that is a note that i wrote the chief of staff on january 6th. likely around 3:00. >> it's a no card but that is your handwriting ms. hutchinson? >> that is my handwriting. >> hannity: we have a problem she did not write that letter,

he claims that he did. that is his name biting out her handwriting. now one of them and telling the truth and one is not. now she is lying about the letter we need to know and by the way we can easily ascertain the truth in this. again the committee doesn't care they put out a statement that claimed the committee has dennis diligence on this and found ms. hutchinson's account of this matter is credible. what diligence did you do exactly? now if this is such an important committee for sending such important evidence of the american people i don't know handwriting it is i'll be honest the committee than ever asked a secret service about her story why not get, follow the science will use the democrats favorite line. follow the science a cup bring in handwriting experts and let them verify the handwriting on the letter as it has, or is it hers? keep in mind during illegitimate proceeding or covering up evidence that would be considered deeply unethical and

would usually indicate right then and there orbits found out later it would overturn a guilty verdict for example. if this was legitimate proceeding with all sides being heard what we would hear from that handwriting expert would also hear these critical facts take a look. >> calling up the guard and they became the chain of command went to nancy pelosi and to the mayor of washington, d.c. did you as required by law authorize that? >> 100% and attested to by many people and they turned it down. nancy pelosi turned it down. >> the written refusal to communication between the leader of the capitol police in their chain of command to the o.d. refusing request to allow national guard men and women to stay generally 4-5 before january 6.

>> without a doubt sean we made that very clear not just once but on numerous occasions we want to make sure that there was plenty of national guard all the ready in case there was some sort of violence. >> i had a meeting with president donald trump on the 3rd of january concerning threats and he was warning if there was any request for national guard support? >> what was the president's response to you for a guts of the request made by mayor bowser? >> fillet and do whatever was necessary to protect the demonstrators. >> hannity: as you just heard 4-5 people that we now have on tape present during that meeting in the oval office on january the 4th. then-president jumped stomach tromp they were never called up by nancy pelosi or d.c. mayor bowser as a law requires because they get jurisdiction president trump did his job.

they didn't do their part. if this was legitimate committee and one to prevent this from ever happening again they would demand the emails, call logs, all text messages from speaker nancy pelosi and mayor bowser sent a letter by the way randomly declining national guard support. we also get phone records from the house sergeant and arms, text and emails. the surgeon and arms in the senate i believe he passed away god rest his soul. chuck schumer by the way we get all of his information the capitol police chief request of national guard six separate times but was turned down by the capital security officials why hasn't he been called in before national tv? we also like to hear from the secret service agents that we reference yesterday during testimony would like to hear from the handwriting experts whose handwriting was it? other key witnesses of course that's never gonna happen

because this is not a legitimate committee. this is critical because it destroys the entire predetermined narrative that donald trump wanted violence and was happy about the violence encourage the violence, and the committee with all their selective self-serving editing still refuses to show in the hearings would donald trump also said during that rally. this. >> i know that everyone here will soon be marching up to the capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard. >> that would be the call of more evidence of committee refuses to show you the american people. calling up ahead of time 20,000 troops at sounds like he cared more than bowser and pelosi about safety of the capital. don't care about the truth either is it just a bunch of sad pathetic politicians who are obsessed with all things donald trump figured to be

relevant only to this committee liquids on this committee. jim or jeremy raskin he himself once contested the results of the 2016 election. he attempted to block a certification along with ten other democrats. wow one might say he is an insurrectionist himself. 2004, that guy benny thompson attempted to do the same thing with president bush. wow what about him? now all of a sudden they care about accepting all elections results no questions asked. 100 people on the committee are supporting stacey abrams? and then there's the least honest person and the entire washington swamp which is saying something that guy the congenital liar adam schiff. or the biggest russian collusion truther's in the entire world. he told everyone he possessed top-secret evidence proving donald trump's collusion with

russia will that never materialized except for him on tape with a russian pranksters saying that they had compromising materials on donald trump and he was scheming to get them. all of this by the way so-called evidence has been deed debunked why? because he is nothing but a congenital white liar and that brings us now to congressman liz cheney. look at that right there pictured with the warm embrace of yesterday's star witness they are hugging a prior witness several days ago. now quick question. we're just supposed to sit back and accept all of the anti-tromp rhetoric by all the donald trump and teachers, but not one person was a different point of view on this committee? we are supposed to just take every thing is pure gospel truth. a committee by the way was apparently very close with the witnesses, a committee that has members who never accepted the results of the 2016 election and other elections. a committee without any pro-trump republicans.

a community purposely living out critical testimony of donald trump's efforts to protect the capital with national guard troops before crowds ever showed up in washington, d.c. especially in smart of the light of 574 riots were dozens of americans died and thousands of cops were injured and billions of property damage that seem like a wise and prudent thing to do. jim jordan, jim banks will join us in just a moment they were not allowed on the committee they were kicked off the committee by questionnaire because the committee doesn't care about the whole truth and nothing but the truth. it doesn't care about ethics. he doesn't care about real justice. it doesn't care about making the capital more secure. the committee only cares about smearing donald trump and trying to make it impossible for him never run again. ohio congressman jim jordan in indiana correspond with us. we start with the basics and the font to metals jim jordan. okay i would bring in the

secret service agents when hear from them. i bring in a handwriting experts and they could determine was it hirschman or the woman from yesterday catherine that rode on that piece of paper. i would bring a nancy pelosi. i bring in the sergeant of arms, i bring in chuck schumer and the capitol police chief why aren't they brought in? why didn't they call in the guard? why didn't they bring in all the people who donald trump authorized the guard went re-hearing any of these things in this committee? >> this is in an finder of facts. nine people have voted to impeach donald trump. understand all we have in this committee is lies, after lies after lies. they lied about representatives. they lied about her documents. the lab at eric herschmann's notes. they let about the secret service. they lied about me twice and

text messages that i forwarded to the chief of staff of the video clip. all we have gotten his life, after lied, after live. particularly when there's no chance to cross-examine and no chance to see the documents. the about all the lies that we have caught the men and that's without having any access to the transcripts of the deposition. there's so many things that has to be false based on the simple fact that we comment seven lies without seeing any of the evidence. >> hannity: jim banks one of the things you would want answered on this committee if you and jim jordan were on there because i would think that you would want to answer if donald trump authorized the 20,000 guard troops i would argue we wouldn't ever be talked about january 6. wouldn't you want to know the answer to the question, why didn't they take advantage of a president. oh, we lost jim jordan. congressman jordan what you want to know the answer to the

question of donald trump gave you 20,000 troops and authorize them? member inspector general exonerate her the donald trump defense saying that they handle january 6 perfectly. >> that's why were not of the committee's nancy pelosi knew that we would raise those answer questions and understand this nancy pelosi was never gonna let people on the committee who actually can ask the questions of the american people would like answered too. she was never cannot allow that. she was wanted this committee come of this part is she was committed to whoever the leader put up over this committee because she wanted this outcome they can run their partisan show trial and some legal after president donald trump. in the country is not falling for thank goodness because they have common sense and understands when you have a bias partisan committee process. >> hannity: jim if you are on the committee or the main questions that you would want to ask?

>> nancy pelosi is the only person in the united states cap rubble who anything up about january 6. she refused to cooperate with the senate homeland security to many who asked her for documents about the national guard being called off for bad optics and she refused to give those documents over to that bipartisan investigation in the senate. that's why she didn't want them on the committee because we demanding answers about her failures, or lack of leadership to systemic breakdown of security of the capital on january 6. she won't allow this investigation go anywhere near that topic because it deviates from this highly partisan narrative going after donald trump in their attempt to prevent donald trump from putting his name on the ballot because they know if he does he will win in 2024b the president again. spew one last question, what happened in regards to the president and subpoena of other congressman was at standout?

>> we have sent letters to the committee are waiting for some kind of response but as you pointed out at some president ever happened in history so much of this committee has never happened in history of our great country again that's why the maccabee will see for what it is. i would also point out the gun how the democrats in this committee and the democrats have openness government i guess the leader their republican party against donald trump. weaponize the fbi. they weaponize the impeachment process a few years ago when they went after donald trump and other weaponized the committee process and never in history simply to go after donald trump. that's how much they're out to get the skype but it's not gonna work. spew one thank you very much. sorry we lost you for a while joining us now in fox news legal analysts from a florida attorney general. >> hannity: let's get your take on the legal aspects of this. there are certain rules that must apply in a courtroom hearsay evidence is not admissible for example.

withholding exculpatory evidence that is unacceptable either in a courtroom. both seems to be accessible here your thoughts on both of those issues? to go first that's what people don't cross trust congress. like what we experienced an impeachment one, and two. this continuing on. the select, unselect committee did and it didn't want to hear these witnesses because they do want the truth. the promise young woman in her 20s would been unemployed for over a year. she reached out to me because she was very excited she was moving to palm beach to work for the president. she loved president trump while after the election. she loved him. spew one i had a report tonight saying that she worked for president trump in the d.c. post president office. post-presidency. >> she reached out to me shawn because she was looking for a place to live in florida.

she is very excited. this is a young 20 something-year-old. doesn't have financial resources. probably has been employed and was excited to move to palm beach. in her contemporaries told the president that she cannot be trusted. she was a leak or when she was in the white house. she didn't get to go to palm beach. she reached out to me again and she was very upset. i didn't understand why people would say that about her. the woman i saw yesterday on the stand was not the same woman. now i understand. she was well rehearsed. in a court of law she would been cross-examined we promised something for your testimony? a job, money, did you receive immunity forgiving on the witness stand? there's so much more how do you recall every detail, every detail of this testimony over a year later? >> hannity: if she worked for donald trump we should know that if there was any other financial transactions we should know that too.

i heard the exact same thing that you would heard greg from a legal standpoint what is your take on all this? >> if a story sounds too outrageous to be true it usually not true that's especially the case when information such as hutchinson's has been laundered through several individuals the bare minimum this is triple hearsay is probably quadruple hearsay a guy pulled the guy who told me in on telling you the committee. hearsay is inadmissible. a double hearsay is a joke. triple hearsay is a farce. anything beyond that need to get your head examined. there is nobody on this committee because it's highly partisan task any challenging or penetrating trquating questionsn cross-examination for example is in a true ms. hutchinson that you were inside the suv with the presid you didn't see what happen. you didn't hear what happened. so you really have no idea what

occurred is for other allegations and statements that she allegedly heard. wait a minute isn't true that you just said you were in the general vicinity and you overheard the statements to the effect of. isn't it true you don't know precisely what happened? that would be a decent cross-examination. they ignore the donald trump. >> hannity: the fifth person was a general who been unable to interview them with some close to home did assure me that conversations about the safety of the capital did come up between him and present donald trump. the fact that the president authorized guard troops in the days leading up. don't be exculpatory will not destroy the entire narrative this committee is trying to push? >> yes it would sean none of

that would've been admissible to see american public that's one thing. that's what they've done since donald trump has been in office. this is acute to merrick garland to prosecute donald trump, none of this will be admissible. they know that the justice department is all hearsay and i let the secret service agents are coming forward too saying that it didn't happen, did not happen we want to testify. we should've been heard heard earlier we weren't. her credibility is shot. nothing that she could say could be true. no one would trust it anymore. spew 120 seconds greg the evidence of the troops being authorized by the president? >> yeah absolutely any responsible committee would've investigated that. one thing about liz cheney she could've just picked up the phone and talk to the people who actually saw and heard what happened in would've been told according to fox reporting that

it's all untrue. maybe she already knew it was untrue which means that she was hiding exculpatory evidence from congress and the american people. spew one i hope they sent a preservation letters for every person i committee every staffer on the committee because there was be a new congress in november. next january i think both. joe biden once again has nasty words and exchanges with reporters. we have tapes, plus stephen colbert asking aoc if she wants to run for president. we have the answer may be the best alec baldwin take you've never heard. i have a muscle possession straight ahead. ♪ ♪ three children. ruthann and i like to hike. we eat healthy. we exercise. i noticed i wasn't as sharp as i used to be. my wife introduced me to prevagen and so i said "yeah, i'll try it out." i noticed that i felt sharper,

i felt like i was able to respond to things quicker. and i thought, yeah, it works for me. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. hi, i'm nancy. i've lost over 80 pounds with golo. i have tried to lose weight in the past and i've lost 80 pounds several times, but i was not able to maintain it. with golo, i've maintained this weight loss for over a year. it just works.

♪ ♪

>> hannity: he's been away all in europe tramping through palaces with all his fancy friends at the king us band and prime ministers from across the globe, but he seems annoyed that the press is there to crash the party just take a look at how rudely he dismissed reporters from a meeting today because he wanted to, they just want to ask him a few questions its color job joe take a look. >> president biden: thank you so much. >> hannity: at least they didn't call him a stupid son of a bit like the last time. they have the right you may be in europe but just write our first amendment still hold strong to be someone apparently joe was also angry at his own party do not backing them up on this genius plan run for reelection in 2024 at the age of

81. when one person who still not on board with joe biden 2024 is the real speaker of the house testing or congresswoman alexandria cortez. fight the media is asking if she wants to take on joe biden and run for president herself take a look. >> there is some speculation as to whether present joe biden's can run in 2024. the some reports that he's a that people keep asking if you on saying some people say are you sure? are you sure? i know somebody who's in return 35 a month before the election in 2024. represent your 14th is a job appealing to you at all? theoretically. >> listen i think that we need to focus on keeping democracy. for anybody to be president in the next couple of years. i do know about that. >> hannity: the elect reaction

to that mike huckabee. governor i would argue that aoc in the squad has more sway, more power over the democratic socialist party and the new greendale than joe biden has nancy support nancy pelosi is in a far out assertion the reason i make it is because everything that the squad is wanted that's her agenda. >> he is well captive to the far left of his party and he has been since he got the nomination. it's pretty apparent that joe biden is not sure what he stands for he just reached the cards tells him walk in, say hello to everyone, sit down, stand up go to the toilet. be careful when you sit down, donate the paper. [laughs] [laughs] it's just bizarre. i think you are exactly right i think you're right sean that that's exactly what's happening,

but here's what i wish people would remember. i know you remember it when joe biden said that if anyone is a administration ever show disrespect to the press she would be fired on the spot, on the spot he said. joe biden should fire himself. [laughs] >> hannity: not bad, not bad i would agree with that. your take? >> unfortunately it would be pretty delightful footage love to hear the argument between joe biden and himself over that? that clip from aoc it's pretty illuminating first of all it is astonishing the gratitude that aoc shows towards joe biden because sean are exactly right. if the president has given these people absolutely everything they've ever wanted aoc will never get this level, this the high water level of power she has in washington because

literally joe biden has given them everything they wanted and more and it's why the country is going down the toilet. whether it's economically or in terms of security or terms of justice, but i do think it's interesting that clip which aoc says is that she is she's worried about losing democracy in the next two years. will thank god she has finally come to her senses and realized the democrats in charge of the house and the senate. >> hannity: the squad is setting the agenda and the bernie joe biden manifesto is setting it. >> yeah you're right. he's gonna say he's in a limited fossil fuels will guess what we've a 41 year high of inflation $5 a gallon gas it's going higher. >> instead of illuminating fossil fuels we just lemonade fossils that would put joe out

of business [laughs] because he wouldn't be able to continue. it's not the fuel that's killing us as the fossils who are running the policies would never made a good decision. [laughs] >> hannity: you're funny tonight. >> this guy has never made a good decision when he came to foreign policy and i we see neither has he made a good decision and domestic policy. spew one last 30 seconds. >> it's amazing what we are seeing right now are the promises that joe biden has made. this is the utopia the democrats been promising forever and you look around people realize you can afford gasoline, you can for groceries. there is an invasion of the border and crime is coming it's out-of-control. this of the utopia that they promise. >> hannity: governor you are on your a game, a+ tonight. your daughter would be proud but she is still to be the best

governor and arkansas history does make a prediction. we come back kamala harris and joe biden speaking out and breaking her silence about the horrific deaths of 53 migrants found dead in the back of that tractor-trailer this week is that of saying what you would do to fix the border the open border policy she likes and accepts she attacked texas governor greg abbott how does that make sense? he will respond next. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ >> hannity: vice president, harris breaking her silence on the horrific deaths of 53 migrants at the border instead of getting to a solution and self introspection policies she

attacked texas governor greg abbott in interview with npr saying he went straight into the politics instead of dealing with the realities of the issues. they he's been dealing with those everyday don't forget to stop in well over a year since joe biden pointed kamala harris to be the borders are. it's only fair to ask what she done to address the problem? what solutions has she proposed deal made one trip to the border and wasn't even an important part of the border pit stop on her way to california. the sitter for fixing fixing the problem she is in charge we've been assured a number of times i kamala harris is addressing the root causes of migrant crisis. while going to central america? the strategy is not working for the last year there been over 2.3 million border crossings a record 205,000 last month with no end in sight and the record crossings again broken in may. tonight we are also learning

news about really disturbing details about the driver of the truck involved in this tragic event will law enforcement tells san antonio express news that he was high on meth when he was arrested near the truck that he abandoned. governor joins us with a reaction with if you want to respond to the vice president you can, but i agree with you. they are responsible for this you've done everything that you have legally in your authority to do they are aiding and abetting lawbreaking they are the ones giving out free phones. the one saying that basically it's open borders have shown it by the policies a process and release. also free transportation all over the country. governor i don't see what fault at all here. >> will sean i forgot the kamala harris goes for the borders are. to my knowledge she is not said anything about the border this entire year.

the first thing that she says is to criticize the one governor justin moore to secure the border than any other governor in america. so while she and joe biden continue to twiddle their thumbs in a do absolutely nothing to even solve this catastrophe that took place just this week it was me in texas on the ground on the border today rows announcing initiatives of what texas gonna do to try to do joe biden's job of making sure that we are a a better job as a country to prevent truckers from transporting and smuggling migrants. as the department of safety who setting up checkpoints so we can check and make sure that smugglers are not smuggling these people and to america and talks like this. spew one if i went to your border and i met people at the border and i gave them a free phone, give them free transportation to another state what i be a human trafficker and be guilty of breaking laws,

immigration laws in this country? >> i think it would be an accomplice to violating the immigration laws that exist in america. to violate those laws is a crime and anyone who aids in that process could be potentially prosecuted for a crime. >> hannity: what is next? what options you have your disposal considering that there is nothing that you can do that the federal government doesn't uphold the laws of the land. he joe biden is not upholding the law and he is aiding in abating a lawbreaker. what power do you have to stop it? you normally have the power. >> we are using every tool that we can sean or think of new ideas as frequently as we possibly can just give you two examples of things to be announced today. one is the strike forces that will operate in unison 20 each with air to be working to try to deter and detect and apprehend illegal immigrants come across

the border in addition to that we know announced today that the texas national guard, 55 more miles of barrier on private property. this last point real quick sean. federal poverty, local property, and private property. were now working with private property owners to build barriers on their property. spew when you stand by your comment? he has blood on his hands? >> or member the sean this is not even close to the first death that has occurred. there's been hundreds of people who lost their lives this year because of joe biden's open border policies. it gets worse and joe biden needs to start fulfilling his responsibilities at secure the border. ♪ ♪ >> hannity: thank you governor for being with us alec baldwin interviews woody allen including very bizarre moments including a major freak out by the actor and the greatest tape of anybody in

the history of radio. alec baldwin, i will play for you for you and you will understand next. ♪ ♪ miralax is different. it works naturally with the water in your body to unblock your gut. ...free your gut. and your mood will follow.

♪ ♪ >> hannity: alec baldwin back in the news, but there's one thing that he's never been particularly good at. broadcasting especially radio. in our member the time a guest host as a local radio talk show host and got no calls and eventually that talk about me i think it's not rush limbaugh on. not the greatest moment in radial not at all it's alec baldwin take a look. >> when can we take some calls? >> no calls yet.

>> what people do people call? >> to have the call number in front me? i'm so sorry. that's interesting. interesting. to have any calls yet? no calls the suites read some more about saul and tollett he. is sean hannity scientologist? pose in the big questions. do any calls? boy it's just incredible. >> hannity: he gets no call so he calls his mother to be a guest on the radio show greatest moment of radio. while alec baldwin took another job the microphone just recently, but for some reason decided to interview the wacky former movie director and weirdo woody allen and went about as well as you would expect in alec baldwin production would go take a look. >> there's a chance.

(speaking non-english) >> okay let's do this. [laughs] >> hannity: you can't make this up. [laughs] first will start with a radio broadcast we all know radio broadcast to none of us that is the greatest moment in the history of radio ever agree or

disagree? [laughs] [laughs] >> i agree [laughs] out they are right now you get called for 30 years, clay gets called, i get called. i can't believe no call that's hilarious. it's unbelievable. spew when it went on forever. >> hannity: he was trying to be at radio talk so host my former flex shift in new york they called in an tact and got so angry he walked out of the studio and didn't finish the show true story. i was she stated radio he's fantastic at it. >> you know that this is what happens in radio they take somebody would never done radio before and they put him in front of a mic anything to be really easy because their famous actors because their famous tv people and after about 5 minutes you can see them sweating because

it's not very easy to do. this reminds me i first started doing sports talk radio we auctioned off the opportunity to come in and guest host. our member everyone is a big talker but as soon as the mic went on they didn't have a lot to say got super nervous and they told every story they had in their life and they looked out the clock and it had been like 9 minutes there like old man. three hours every day? alec baldwin interviewing woody allen was unable to get o.j. simpson? [laughs] [laughs] how do you go with woody allen everyone lexmark >> hannity: o.j. is friends with leo. >> the symbol were talking about it's harder to do radio than tv. you do a three hour show on radio it is much harder to do radio and tv on any day.

>> hannity: all right i have the tape valid baldwin when me and mark called in and he was a guest host with a friend of mine brian whitman who is trying to guide him through it and then he walked of the studio. >> listen sean. >> come back my comeback alec. he's gone. alec? alec has walked out of the studio alec please come back. he is in the other room alec baldwin has put on a jacket and he has left. [laughs] [laughs] >> sean, sean can you show him the table when i walked at your show on radio? a monkey to bring this up right now? i'm joking, i'm joking. spew one tomorrow night, tomorrow night. >> no, no, no.

>> here is what i want to see. once he baldwin, o.j. simpson, and i want to see a breakdown everything with jussie smollett. i want all the people who are actors in hollywood and celebrity i want them all on together may be leo bagnall: we can just get the bottom of everything. i went jussie smollett to find the guys who are wearing mega hats trying to lynch him and i want for alec baldwin to find the guy who is responsible for those murders in new mexico. spew one haze o.j. still legal for the real killers on the golf course? [laughs] [laughs] >> hannity: i'm just asking a quick question. >> i think you can find them on the golf course. this killers on the golf course. >> hannity: thank you both, more "hannity" next. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ spew one unfortunately that's the time that we have left this thing for being with us and then you for making the show possible please set your dvr so you never miss an episode of "hannity." >> hannity: foxnews.com, hannity.com i've got good news let not your hop your hearts be troubled "the ingraham angle" and laura is ready to take it away with a great show. >> laura: i was waiting, i was waiting. spew one i've yet to see you in new york. i'm not sure if the undisclosed studio that i don't know about. [laughs] [laughs] >> laura: did you hear about the new reality show did you hear about this? it is a big deal it's called a real executive assistance of pennsylvania avenue. have you heard about that? [laughter] a lot of auditions and a lot of public additions going on right now so we will pick that