>> we are awaiting president biden computer can see there is the roosevelt room. in moments you will hear him sign an executive order to protect abortion. the president is expected to outline efforts to mitigate some potential penalties women seeking abortion can face following the supreme court's decision to overturn roe vs. wade. the plan would obstruct the department of justice and health and human services to push back against any state effort to

limit a women's ability to cross state lines for a legal abortion order get federally approved abortion medication. it comes at a time when the president has come under fire from some within his own party for not acting with more urgency. this is "outnumbered." i'm kayleigh mcenany here with my cohost, harris faulkner and emily compagno. also joining us as lisa boothe and richard fowler. what we are about to see, mla, is a giant red herring. i had our brain room look at what we found. currently no states ban or have attempted to ban interstate travel to obtain abortions. that's the crux of the steel we are about to sign. not only that if you read the opinion, brett kavanaugh has an occurrence and it says this, some of the other abortion related legal questions raised by state's decisions are not too especially difficult as a constitutional matter. for example, a state cannot bar a resident of another state from traveling to another state to obtain an abortion.

in my view the answer to that question is not based on the constitutional right to interstate travel. brett kavanaugh, john roberts, three liberal justices, that equals five. he's trying to go after something that quite simply if you read the opinion is a red herring to. >> i think that's what i've dovetails on to what we've been hearing from the progressive left and those in his party blindly supporting his decisions, actions, behavior and thus the entire time which is missing the point. the substantive point of what the dobb's decision band, how would overturn roe vs. wade, what it restored and what it did not. and what it meant this can be one more signal he can point to. i don't think it's gonna be successful because those same cheerleaders for him no matter what happens are going to champion it no matter what. those that i actually know those that actually look into and read what's going on i think it's really incumbent upon the g.o.p. to counter this with actual

facts and messaging in each individual state. i think it's not enough to let it lie with him engaging in this period were going to hear his remarks soon as well as amplification i think really is incumbent. and how it actually affects us. >> harris, with the two-minute warning for this comes as aoc is calling for more -- >> harris: he was vice president of the united states when they had the authority under obama. all those majorities existed to use their political capital to codify roe vs. wade they didn't do that, they made other choices about where they wanted to put their might. now you are now trapped if you are president biden because you're trying to explain away why you didn't do it if you had a chance to do it by doing something with executive order, which really is he said will not be as binding perhaps or game changing is healed wanted to be.

but it does do one thing, it fires up their base to let them know on the far left of this president is willing to listen to you and do what he said he would do. i can't imagine that aoc is anything but gleeful. not only because this might happen to make any kind of difference for women, but because she got listen to him. they want on the far left from somebody to legitimize this it wasn't bernie's day. what's next 86 at the end of your second term probably will not get it done. probably not. >> it comes at a time when he's hemorrhaging support among democrats. the other writers posts showing only 86% approval from the president. his pole within his own democrat

party declined somewhat. this week 69% of democrats could approve compared to 85% in august. he is focused on inflation and apparently some are perturbed saying he have to -- and nothing is no executive order. >> president biden: hello, everyone. before i speak to the supreme court extreme decision overturning decision overturning roe, i want to comment in one piece of good news, economic good nose today. the labor department reported that we've added 372,000 jobs last month. 372,000. here's why it's important, our private sector is now recovered all of the jobs lost during the pandemic, and added jobs on top of that. we have more americans working today in the private sector then any day under my predecessor. more today than any time in american history. today. in the second quarter of this

year we've created more jobs than at any court or under any of my predecessors in nearly 40 years before the pandemic. think about that. at a time when our critics of the economy was too weak or heavy and already had a more jobs in my first year as president of any president in history. we still added more jobs in the past three months than any administration in 40 years. no luck, i know times are tough. prices are too high. families are facing the cost -- but today's economic news can the unemployment rate is near historic low of 3.6%. private sector jobs are at a record high. gas prices still way too high, had fallen now 25 days in a row. this week we saw the second largest single day decrease in gas prices in a decade. we still have a lot to do work today. but i am suggesting we make

significant process, the program is working. now with the vice president, secretary of the serendipity attorney general monaco i want to talk about an executive order i'm signing to protect reproductive rights of women in the aftermath of the supreme court's terrible, extreme, and i think so totally wrongheaded decision to overturn roe vs. wade. i announced right after the decision, as well as setting the measures today. let's be clear about something from the very start. this was not a decision driven by the constitution. this was not a decision driven by the constitution. despite what those justices on the majority said, this is not a decision driven by history. the majority rattles off laws from the 19th century.

in the 1880s towards the end. that's just wrong. the truth is that today's supreme court majority that is playing fast and loose with the facts, even a hundred and 50 years ago the common law and many state laws did not criminalize abortion early in pregnancy, which is very similar to the viability line drawn by row. the dobbs majority ignores that fact, and the dobbs majority ignores the many laws are enacted to protect women at the time when they were dying from unsafe abortions. this is the horrific reality that roe sought to end. we should not be frozen in the 19th century. so what happened here is the quote. either llano fact nor attitudes

to reach a different result than casey did. all that has changed is this quote. that was about the constitution or law. the majority is overruled roe and casey for only one reason. there's always despised him. it was an exercise i immediately announce what i would do but i also made it clear based on the reasoning of the court there is no constitutional right to choose, only the weight -- the only way to fulfill that right for women in this country is fivefold and, by exercising the

power at the ballot box. let me explain. we need two additional pro-choice senators and a pro-choice house to codify roe is federal law. your vote can make that a reality. i know it's frustrating, and it makes a lot of people very angry. the truth is that is, it's not just me saying it. it's what the court said. when you read a decision we will not protect the rights of women, period. after having made a decision based on the reading of a document when women didn't even have the right to vote the cool court now practically there is women of america to go to the ballot box and restore the -- will the most is destroying our parts decision in my view is the root majority rights, and i quote -- had to quit now from

the majority. women are not without electoral or political power. it is noteworthy that the percentage of women who register to vote and cast a ballot is consistently higher in the percentage of the men who do so. end of quote. women are not without electoral and/or political -- let me be precise, or political power. that's another sign way of saying to you women of america determine the outcome of the sin issue. i don't think the court republicans who for decades have pushed their extreme agenda, have a clue about the power american women but they are about to find out in my view. it's my hope emma and strong belief, that woman will in fact turn now and record numbers to reclaim the rights of been taken from them by the court. let me be clear, well i wish it had not come to this, this is the fastest route available. i'm just stating the basic

fundamental motion, the fastest way to restore roe is to pass a national law codifying roe, which i will sign immediately upon its passage at my desk. we cannot wait. extreme republican governors, extreme republican state legislators, and republican extremist in the congress overall, all of them have not only fought to take away the right -- all rights, but they are now determined to go as far as they can. now the most extreme republican governors are taking the court's decision as a green right to oppose them of the most harshest and restrictive laws seen in this country in a long time. these are the laws that not only put women's lives at risk, these are the will cost lives. what we are witnessing is a giant step backwards in much of our country. already the band is affecting more than 13 states pay 12 additional states are likely to ban choice in the next coming

weeks. a number of these states the laws are so extreme that they've raised the threat of criminal penalties for doctors and health care providers. there are so extreme that many don't allow for exceptions even for rape. let me say it again. some of the states don't allow exceptions for rape or incest. just last year a 10-year-old girl was a rape victim. she was forced to have to travel out of the state to indiana to seek to terminate the presidency and baby saved her life. ten years old. ten years old. six weeks pregnant. already traumatized. this forced to travel to another state. imagine being that little girl. seriously, just imagine being the little girl. ten years old.

does anybody believe this highest majority view will come of that that should not be able to be dealt with. or in any other state in the nation? a 10-year-old girl should be forced to give birth to a rapist's child? i can tell you that i do not. i can think of anything much more extreme. the court's decision is a b been received by republicans in congress as a green light to go further and pass a national ban. a national ban. remember what they're saying, they're saying there's no right to privacy so therefore is not protected by the constitution gets what led up to the states and the congress for what they want to do. now my republican friends are talking about getting congress to pass a national ban. that would mean the right to

choose will be illegal nationwide if, in fact, they succeed. let me tell you something, as long as i'm president it will not happen. i will veto it. the choice is clear, they want to change the circumstances for women and little girls in this country, please go out and vote. when tens of millions of women vote this year, they will not be alone. millions and millions of men will be taking up the fight alongside to restore the right to choose in the broader right to privacy which they denied existing. and the challenge from the court to the american women and men that this is a nation the challenges go out and vote. for god sake there's an election effort.

vote, vote, vote. considering the challenge accepted court, but in the meantime i'm sending this important executive order. i'm asking the justice department that, much like they did in the civil rights era, do everything in their power to protect these women seeking to invoke their rights. states or clinics are still up and can protect them from intimidation, can protect the right of women to travel to states to provide that care. protect a woman's right to fda approved federal drug administered medication has been available for over 20 years. the executive order provide safeguards to access care. a patient comes into an emergency room in any state in the union, she is expressing or experiencing life-threatening miscarriage, but the doctors can

be so concerned about being criminalized or treating her, their delayed treatment to call hospital lawyer was concerned the hospital would be penalized if the doctor provides life-saving care. it's outrageous. i don't care what your position as it's outrageous. and it's dangerous. enter all patients, including pregnant women and girls, experience pregnant experiencing pregnancy loss get emergency care they need under federal law. on the doctors have the clear guidance on their own responsibilities and protections, no matter what state they are in. justice thomas himself said that under the reasoning of this decision, this is what justice thomas said in his concurrent opinion, that the court should reconsider the

constitutional right to contraception even among married couples. what century are we end? they used to be a case called connecticut versus griswold which was declared unconstitutional in the late 60s that said a married couple in the privacy of their bedroom could not decide to use contraception. right now in all 50 states and the district of columbia, the affordable care act ensures including free birth control. the executive to order encourages hhs to expand reproductive health services like iuds, birth control pills, emergency contraception. and equally important this executive order protects patient

privacy and access to information. which, looking at the press assembled before me, probably know more about it than i do. i'm right now when you use a search engine. they select two of, there is an increasing concern of extremist governors and others who will try and get that data off of your phone which is out there in the ether to find what you're seeking, where you're going commend what you're you're going regarding health care. talk about no privacy. no privacy in the constitution, there is no privacy period. this executive order asks the ftc to crackdown on data brokers and sell private information to extreme groups. or in my view sell private information to anybody. it provides private health

information and states with extreme laws. executive order strengthens coronation of the federal level. it establishes a task force led by the white house department, and the department of human services, focus specifically and using every federal tool available to protect access to reproductive health care. let me close with this. a court and its allies are committed to moving america backwards with fewer rights, less autonomy, and up politicians debating their -- remember the reasoning of the decision has an impact much beyond roe. in the right to privacy generally. marriage equality, contraception, and so much more is at risk. this decision affects everyone unrelated to choice, beyond choice. we cannot allow an out-of-control supreme court working in conjunction with

extremist settlements of the republican party to take away freedoms and their personal autonomy. the choice we face as a nation between the mainstream and the extreme, between moving forward and moving backwards, between along politicians into the most personal parts of our lives, protecting the right of privacy. yes embedded in our constitution, this is a choice. this is a moment. the moment. the moment to protect our nation from extremist agenda that is antithetical to everything we believe as americans. and i'm going send this executive order.

protecting access to reproductive health care. can you give us an update on your thinking about -- >> i tried to put a call in to the present prime minister. it was very late at night i'll be talking they're in the morning, i'm going to be stopping to sign the condolence book at the japanese embassy. this hasn't happened in japan in decades and decades.

it's a homemade weapon. we've only seen a photograph of it, the justice department the fact is that what once they did get my attention, this is the first use of a weapon to murder somebody in japan. i think we thus help our heads had 3,000 -- between three and 4,000 cases, they have one. one. and so were going to learn more about as time goes on about motive for the present prime minister is a very solid

guy. japan is a very stable ally. i do not believe that it is likely to happen -- i don't think it's likely to have any profound stabilizing impact in japanese solidarity. thank you all. >> that was president biden announcing his executive orders. let's bring a jonathan hurley of george washington university law professor and fox news contributor. it's hard to tell where to start. imagine the contraception case, somehow banning women from crossing straight lines. the cabin out concurrence explicitly so that would be unconstitutional. this is history and tradition not being entertained appropriately by the court when in fact it was.

and you noted so on twitter. >> there was much about these remarks that were quite curious. he seemed to refer to griswold as standing for the opposite of what griswold stands for. griswold was the protection of that right. he seemed to refer to it as a rejection of the right to use contraception. there were some unfair moments not just calling them repeatedly that justice is extremist, but he says as you have noted that he didn't consider the early english american -- that's entirely and demonstrably untrue. now you can disagree with how they view that history but to say they ignored it was really quite unfair. there were other aspects that i suggest justices were probably grinding their teeth when listening to this. one is in fact bringing up this

issue for whether contraception's will soon be made unlawful. that is expressly readjusted in the dobbs decision. i've been covering it for enough time, over 30 years. i've never seen a case for the court repeatedly and expressly dismissed a future argument. he comes back repeatedly to say this cannot be used to deny the right of contraception, or to deal with interracial marriage, or same-sex marriage. they repeatedly say they do not view this as analogous. even thomas himself says that. by the way thomas has long been a critic of substantive due process but he felt that they should re-examine that. he did not feel that interracial marriage, like his own, should be viewed somehow as unprotected by the constitution. there are other ways to protect those rights. now all of that obviously gets missed in this political

atmosphere. but it was curious to see the focus on travel. traveling interstate is clearly protected under the constitution. there were supreme court has said that repeatedly. justice kavanaugh went out of his way to say that this is one of those easy issues. he said clearly states cannot prevent women from leaving to get abortion services or any types of services. while brett kavanaugh and john roberts clearly fall into that camp here that the majority of the supreme court. i suspect that you could really push a year unanimity if not unanimous court on that issue. so much of what the president said, frankly, i thought was fairly inaccurate and at times quite unfair. >> jonathan one quick follow-up. you mentioned that this is a rather curious announcement given that the president previously has questioned abortion being a writer. he was a long time supporter of

the hyde amendment which bars several -- >> his senator biden did not feel abortion is a right. he was antiabortion. but more importantly he supported the hyde amendment which is going to be more relevant in the days to come. that's a long standing position that federal funds should not be used to support abortion. and as degree to which agencies are now assisting in people getting abortion services that could become more relevant in the days to compare this a lot of calls for the president uses authority to do precisely that. as a senator, joe biden of voted against the compromise for rape and interest paid he repeatedly voted against those exception in dealing with the hyde amendment. >> fascinate bid to you so much for your analysis. lisa, coming back to you we went through i would drink support among democrats. it seems like an explicit effort

to rein in some of those. >> lisa: first of all i don't understand why he keeps doing the creepy whisper thing. it's time to let that go. there are so many inaccuracies that joe biden has said. i was seething over here while i was listening to it pretty said we have to decide if we want to operate in the mainstream or the extreme predemocrats in congress just voted to allow abortion up until the moment of birth. that puts them in alignment with countries like china and north korea. how is that operating in the mainstream? he also lied about it being a health care with abortion. over 90% of abortions are elective. they are not due to health care reese ends. he is inaccurate on that statement as well. but when you look at what he's doing, there is this massive federal overreach acting as a tyrant not wanting to respect the supreme court, not wanting to respect these safeguards put into place, that our founders put into place to protect us from government to keep checks and balances. what i've been advocating for us 23 red states with republican traffic does come a start getting active.

we need a conservative coalition of governors, much like what we see in congress with the freedom caucus. of aligning themselves together and standing up to this man and standing up to the federal government and getting back to the basics, which is the decentralized government. he's wrong on all of the accounts. stop the creepy whisper. democrats are the experience of their saying declare a national health emergency. i don't think this can be a national health adversary. i don't see this as the democratic or republican. i talked to ob-gyn i've interviewed a couple of them i think about this as a medical procedure and how we view it in that light. they have a fetus where the brain is developing outside of the body, or the heart is developing outside of the body,

or there is a mother who has an incomplete miscarriage and she needs to get medical medicine to complete that miscarriage. well i will say that i have read this executive order through and through. it doesn't really do much. it's just sort of restating it reaffirming what's already in federal law. i think in this moment it's important to do that, when just a couple of weeks ago the governor of north dakota says that she was going to trying implement a way for folks not to get the medicine they need to complete a miscarriage. i think it's important for no matter what states you live and come if you are having a traumatic experience, if you've lost a pregnancy, or you have an end viable fetus you should not have to take that the term and deal with the mental health that goes along with that. i think it's important for women to have the right to make that decision if they are dealing with that. >> harris to emily's point this just sends it back to the states. 72% support the 15 week ban on abortion that started all of this with dobbs so why not let

the states choose? >> oil and why not let the states have substantive conversations about what you're talking about it. you're going to need constitutions at the table come here going to need the millions of moms who don't see it the way that this president and his politics he had. paid he did even acknowledge -- back in 1994 he certainly did it he needed the vote of that one constituent who sent his office a letter. joe biden and 94, then senator. mr. biden, please don't force me to pay for abortions against my conscience the man said. biden assured the man that he understood, promising any position he took on a portion of the u.s. senate would be guided by his conviction that those who opposed abortion should not be compelled to pay for them. he said things like that on no fewer than 50 occasions posting in '94 to have voted against federal funding for abortion. this is a man who is a politician. so when he stands next to the tiny little desk and finally

sits in it, and he signs this paperwork, he knows that it doesn't change at a federal level anything. but what he does is he is trying to gin up the base to go to the polls amid the worst inflation we've seen anna you're in half and the border crisis that at least six counties in texas want to call an invasion. we have more problems than we know to do with. we are looking for them to solve and he picks on the low-hanging fruit. but let's not get it wrong. he's been bifurcated on this issue before pay those in the far left i better not trust him. >> richard: harris, i agree with you and i should add to that. who should be at the table are women pedal go further and say we should definitely be at the table or black women. there are three times more likely to die -- it's not an economic decision. i'm saying that no matter what their economic status, if you or beyonce or williams, or you are

a random woman walking on the street of new york, black women to three times more likely to die in childbirth than their white counterparts. when i putter at the table and say we can fix this health care situation for her. >> harris: the states can do that beer they can sit there and they can do that. >> kayleigh: emily, 63 million women who don't have a voice there at the table to -- >> emily: that's right it has to be a really large table. >> richard: who is of the table right now is a lot of white men. >> emily: my three takeaways from biden speech, number one he was wildly disrespectful to the supreme court. coming from the president it's antithetical to his position which should be one of respect paid he said that they went out-of-bounds, they exceeded their authority bad but that's exactly the opposite of what they did, which was to restrain and contain the otherwise loaded power that the supreme court has been exercising for so long, including former supreme court justice ruth ruth bader ginsburg, the late justice who acknowledge that fact and set this authority should remain with the states,

with the people, with the voters of that state and local level. secondly, he absolutely missed the point. he was galvanizing women voters of the federal level. every answer from him is more federal government. it's the election in 2024, the midterm elections having zero application or zero acknowledgment of that state and local level, which is what this focuses on pity should be galvanizing women, this powerful force at this level. think this is how you rise up this is a black woman should run for office and have their voices be heard at the local level. where the budgets directly translate to their health care and their access prayer the third thing is that is hyperbolic language, he is so divisive. the extreme, he will never ever treat all americans though he promised us on the campaign trail when he said he would be the unifier. >> harris: he doesn't even see the women who don't agree. he could easily have said today that there are women in your community that don't think like he does. i would hope that women would come together at this point at

that state, county, city level and talk about what brings it together so we can work through these issues together. >> he wants to divide us. this has been his presidency is dividing us. we have a federal fetal homicide law, the majority of states have fetal homicide law. i don't understand why we treat it like a life in that instance but we don't treat like a life in the instance of abortion. it is a life. >> exactly. also breaking right now federal forces are telling fox news the border patrol agents who are falsely accused of whipping migrants was fake. even though they were cleared of any criminal conduct. that's next. >> i promise you those people will pay. there will be an investigation and there will be consequences. . some like strategic diversification. some like a little comfort, to balance out the risk.

others want immediate gratification... and long-term gratification,too. they have their own interests, but at the end of the day there's nothing like being... a gold-owner. visit invest.gold to see why gold is everyone's asset.

we're a different kind of dentistry. one who believes in doing anything it takes to make dentistry work for your life. so we offer a complete exam and x-rays free to new patients without insurance - everyday. plus, patients get 20% off their treatment plan. we're on your corner and in your corner every step of the way. because your anything is our everything. aspen dental. anything to make you smile. book today at aspendental.com, walk in, or call 1-800-aspendental. researchers believe the first person to live to 150 has already been born. it could be you! wow. really? of course, you'll have to eat your greens, watch your stress, wear sunscreen... but to live to 150, we're developing solutions

that help doctors listen to your heartbeat while they're miles away, or ai that knows what your body will do before you do. cool. introducing elevance health. where health can go. bath fitter doesn't just fit your bath. introwe fit your life.ealth. when you're tired of looking at your tired old bath, we fit your style, with hundreds of design options. when a normal day is anything but normal, we fit your schedule, with our unique tub over tub process, installed in as little as a day. when high quality is the only quality that matters, we fit your standards, with a lifetime guarantee. bath fitter. it just fits. visit bathfitter.com to book your free consultation. new projects means new project managers. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. when you sponsor a job, you immediately get your shortlist of quality candidates, whose resumes on indeed match your job criteria. visit indeed.com/hire and get started today.

this is the sound of better breathing. fasenra is an add-on treatment for asthma driven by eosinophils. it helps prevent asthma attacks, improve breathing, and lower use of oral steroids. fasenra is not a rescue medication or for other eosinophilic conditions. fasenra may cause allergic reactions. get help right away if you have swelling of your face, mouth and tongue, or trouble breathing. don't stop your asthma treatments unless your doctor tells you to. tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection or your asthma worsens. headache and sore throat may occur. ask your doctor about fasenra. >> border patrol agents falsely accused of whipping. a number that was the wording fan, it's not out i care because

those are not webs. the haitian migrants last september where the people in the pictures there haven't come across our borders. even though the agents were cleared of any criminal conduct. multiple federal forces are telling fox news the biden administration is proposing discipline now, which includes unpaid suspensions of up to 14 days that administrative charges will include unsafe conduct and poor judgment. critics say this is just a move for president biden to save face after promising to make the agents pay. >> i remember the photographer who took these photos said i didn't see anybody whipping anyone pay than you joe biden tried out and say they are going to pay in the photographer is like it's bad. there and an impossible situation along the border. effect of the states i'm glad to governor abbott is stepping up instructing the national

guardsmen to return these illegal leg migrants back to ports of entry. below, it's just utter lawlessness that democrats are embracing, so much so that people are doing their job or being punishment as a result on what we're are seeing actually is backlash in south texas like what we saw on that meyer floor is race, whose -- >> harris: among border seamen. >> picking up the seat that's been a democrats hands for over a hundred years. >> harris: i want to go back to the facts are got to write up the top of the comments. secretary alejandro mayorkas was there the day those pictures in the video was taken. had they really been a whipping in the incident you don't think the secretary would've spoken up? then uttering the words they will pay and suddenly everyone has to say like what are we going to make them pay for? >> nina president biden is at the helm obviously of this federal government. these are all federal employees. it's so disturbing to me that a

former federal attorney that the person in charge is the quickest to judge. he is the one that should say i look forward to seeing the process unfold. i look forward to the results of the investigation but he did the opposite. this is all about optics. i've personally experienced things like employees threatening other employees on the floor with death. and they only get counseling because of the process behind. there is a strict adherence in the disciplinary world is union -- i was told a hundred times when i requested certain measures of discipline because in the past this is what happened, or in the situation this is what happened. we were constantly restricted by what we could do. so the notion that somebody -- they say exercised poor judgment gets a week or two weeks of unpaid suspension, that is unfathomable to me. i hope they appeal come i'm sure successful. but there's nothing that makes that -- >> harris: nothing could have

a quick eclipse the optics of the border at that point with this administration as it was going to do better than the previous one. nothing could eclipse that, except for maybe something made up about agents whipping them. >> richard: there's a couple things. i've done extensive reporting on the southern border about how they actually got to the border and i think that that part of the surf that haiti is an island. many of those migrants, they take cargo ships to brazil and then they walk on foot from brazil to america so there've border and the reason why they do that is because when they get to the port of meet a border patrol agent they're supposed to be met with compassion because of temporary protective status extended to them. that's why i'm assuming that there weren't any disciplinary memo treasures taken. >> harris: that would've been good note for my orca's and others at the border to help put more judges and people in place so you could adjudicate those

cases, right? >> richard: and that's a congressional matter. >> harris: at the biden administration matter. >> richard: touche. i think there has to be a larger conversation about fixing the immigration. i think the white house mishandled this, congress mishandled us in many of those folks who should been granted -- >> harris: both houses are in charge of all three. >> richard: they were sent back to their country and it was a failure of american policy. >> harris: about 15,000 of them underneath the bridge on one of the hottest days as well. as you said, biden dropped the ball on this. russia's move from there because that's true. >> kayleigh: we did an explanation as to how protocol was broken, we know they didn't violate anything criminality. we need an explanation beyond criminalizing these people. when you are at the top you follow a process. there are people below the president, ayanna pressley, who called that white supremacist behavior. congresswoman waters said worse than what we witnessed in

slavery. humor and inhumane treatment of migrants by border patrol -- these are the craziest names in politics but when you go to the top the person above them with posts -- you don't promise that people will pay before there is an investigation. i believe when senator mallorca's first came out he was a little measured and then he also did a 180 to correctly unnecessarily sue them at this -- you don't have to -- they were always going to pay. when you announce the verdict before the investigation. >> harris: this reminds me of the president reflexively calling him a white supremacist, kyle rittenhouse. >> richard: in these photos and in the video you're watching chase them with horses. these people would qualify for temporary protective status and you're chasing them with horses. >> harris: we have to get to this, fox news alert, the world in shock at this point is former

japanese prime minister, shinzo abe assassinated during political speech today. the former japanese leader was rushed to the hospital via helicopter and died. police detained the shooter at the scene, he eventually admitted that he shot abe using a homemade weapon. the attack happened despite japan's strict gun control laws. we are still getting more images from that tragedy. you can see the gunman in this picture standing right behind shinzo abe, look how close he is before you open fired for the shots rang out as the former prime minister deliver that campaign speech, hitting him in the neck and chest. new footage now shows the security detail even tried to block the bullets using their briefcases. there were so many people who spoke out about this. shinzo abe was beloved. not just the current white house but the former president, he was a conservative japanese leader.

and former president donald trump spoke about that. kayleigh? >> kayleigh: he did. this was the first leader president trump met with after winning the white house. he met with shinzo abe here in new york city. met with him several times down in florida. it was an important partner with the president and he tried to better relations with north korea on they often pick up the phone and talk. but to make your point, the depths of an impression that this prime minister made stands partisanship here in the united states, president biden went to hear she mow with shinzo abe. so this is someone who has the respect of the entirety of our country, this is devastating news to wake up to. we will remember the great man, the great leader that shinzo abe was in japan. emily? >> emily: i think it was particularly haunting the same standing so close to the former prime minister before shooting him and then watching that all unfold on video. the protective detail there

lightning fast with trying to protect them. obviously unsuccessful. we know that he shot him twice with a homemade shotgun made out of two pieces of pipe attached to a wooden board with a group in an electronic firing mechanism. we do not know what ammunition or gunpowder he used. i just kept thinking about the effect that they are in japan which has such strict gun laws, that bad people find ways to do bad things. no laws absolutely full proof unfortunately. i will just close by saying prime minister pursued a this an attack on the foundation of democracy heinous, barbaric, malicious. absolutely unforgivable. he said i would like to use the most extreme words available to condemn this act. >> harris: richard? >> richard: i will add to what kayleigh said and said in 2015 shinzo abe after world war ii japan really didn't have an army, they didn't engage in military exercises. what he did was because he believed in democracy so much one thing he put forth was we will start defending democracy with the rest of the global democracies.

he pushed his legislative body to pass laws that allows japan to be part of an alliance to engage in protecting democracy. >> lisa: personally i think post covid everybody is in same pit of the guard he had a high percentage of people around the world that people were mentally often at shut things up and we're seeing a lot of results of that post covid. around the world people are just off their rocker. but i believe the media coverage of this is really sad but to be expected. not us, we are cool, but other outlets. you see cbs calling him a right-wing nationalist come all of these different things talking but his controversial opinions. however you look at "the washington post" and how they treated at big daddy isis leader when he was killed in the u.s. raising they call them austere and religious -- so unfortunately if you are conservative and you pass away.

he was a good man, close friend of president trump and we honor his life and his legacy. >> north korea particular when president trump issued the bold experiment to meet with the north korean leadership try to better relations that has been long-standing as hostile. abe was there. it's trying to lose a major world leader. here in the united states would present can do but it's trying to see this happen. nobody wanted to see it happen. >> harris: i just go back to what you were saying too, at least in terms of what we are seeing among people right now. the fact that they would protect shinzo abe -- that they weren't better prepared with that. more "outnumbered" in just a moment.

♪

[beeping] do you want some more?! wait 'til you see me on the downhill... [laughs] see you at home. enjoy advanced safety at the lexus golden opportunity sales event.

researchers believe the first person to live to 150 has already been born. it could be you! wow. really? of course, you'll have to eat your greens, watch your stress, wear sunscreen... but to live to 150, we're developing solutions that help doctors listen to your heartbeat while they're miles away, or ai that knows what your body will do before you do. cool. introducing elevance health. where health can go.

this is john. he hasn't worked this hard to only get this far with his cholesterol. taken with a statin, leqvio can lower bad cholesterol and keep it low with two doses a year. side effects were injection site reaction, joint pain, urinary tract infection, diarrhea, chest cold, pain in legs or arms, and shortness of breath. with leqvio, lowering cholesterol becomes just one more thing life throws your way. ask your doctor about leqvio. lower. longer. leqvio.

activism to the streets this week completely blocking traffic on i-94 beltway in montgomery county, maryland. and demanding president biden declare an emergency. and that presented a parolee from getting to work. watch. >> no, i'm not allowed to break my parole. if i don't make it to my job, no! one lane, i'm asking one lane! one lane x [bleep] [bleep] >> that parolee was arrested after he became agitated and tried to physically remove allegedly some of the protesters. richard, you and i were talking online the restrictions these parolees are on and no mistakes,

they can't be late. and we have seen them returned to much less an honor for him to comply at times the restrictions. there is no honor and blocking the free weight and blocking people from getting to the work. >> richard: i actually agree with you here. i had a roundtable of returning citizens and really zeroing in on the poems they face once they already sort of down there in time. a lot of them face problems of finding housing because nobody wants to give returning assistant housing. they have a hard time finding a job. because of the deal with the parole officers, it is hard and they face insurmountable trying to reintegrate into society and they need a little bit more grace. the system has no grace to give them. >> kayleigh: the statement is a convict but harris, the point remains that we don't know the outcome for this gentleman. we don't know -- we don't know

but he might be facing 54 years and that other guy remains, no, tell biden to declare a state of emergency. i will not budge. >> harris: i look at it differently but what if you are in the back of that traffic back and having a medical emergency. like come a lot of things going on besides one guy that happens to be out in the middle of the intersection trying to move the people because he's got to get to work on restrictions on being paroled. but what about the rest of us? yes, the first amendment and yes, you can protest peacefully. he is right. you have to have a lane. what if an ambulance needs to get through? are people going to sit there and the cops have to move them? there has to be common ground what peaceful protest looks like. we broke it in may 2020. i don't think we have any idea now. but we need to get back to it and figure it out. >> kayleigh: we went from

violence 2022 absolutely ridiculously. master of art work. >> richard: truckers blocking roads. >> it is because they are trying to find religion, right? look at every study, people on the left, right, that is what this is about. burning cities down in 2020 with black lives matter and in the name of abortion. and this in the name of claimant. it is about finding religion in the form of activism. >> richard: this be clear i think we have seen on both sides of the aisle a little bit of ruckus. [overlapping voices] biden never was a naked by grader. [laughter] >> harris: just you and me be

fairly dumb x before who looks at the protest and they could bike ride come i want to be wite people because you are undermining a failed president. interesting, you have lost the crazies. >> the one thing we have in common. thanks everyone for watching, happy friday and now here is "america reports." ♪ ♪ >> sandra: all right, we are awaiting this hour from customs and border protection and results from an investigation of border agent whipping haitian migrants trying to enter the u.s. >> john: the controversy escalating and some media outlets and falsely identified the agents split reigns as webb's used on the migrants. fox news has confirmed sent out disciplinary proposals for the forest back to mountain a chance.