the time we have left this evening. as always, thank youor for beind with us. thank making this showou possible. please set your dvr so you y never miss an episode of hannity. don't forget for news any time r ne g, hannity, .com and in the meantime, let not your heart be troubled. the great laura ingraham is up a next with another kick . she had one last night the night before she is alwaysys having killed. so you're just you're justnd being nice that you got a haircut. i can barely see you. bei i seee. cutt they say no. whatat they said that they curld the hair tonight. that's the big excitement here later tonight. ei did a little a little greast you know, it really ever put that in. so and by the way, i saw i saw f a screenshot of from election e night twenty . funny don't show me. s and letay me just say we both look really good.d. still.

but that's a 1% ago. that's how long we really see you in the monitor because it's like one hundred lightsig blaric into my okay well looking good.w well we'll pick it up where you left off. all right, i'll try.ra i'm laura ingram . this is the "ingraham angle" t from washington tonight. in moments we're going toen spek to one of donald trump's attorneyson about that ongoing battle over the release of the affidavit. but for now, since august 8th, the day the rate of mara lago,e the angle has been e veryf clear to at least half of the country. this investigation appears to be tainted by politics. now the belief isn't grounded't in some knee dislike of the rank and file fbi. but in recent history, specifically the crusade waged by the deep state the against donald trump froman 2015 onwardt a two tiered systemie of justic. one standard for hunterno and hillary, another for donaldh trump. now fast forward to present day when the feds hunt for donald

trump took another turn. us magistrate bruce reinhard oft jeffrey epstein fame ordered doj lawyers to propose redactions to certain sections of the underlying affidavit, which then will most likelyap be released to the public perhaps late next week. now various media organizations had petitioned the court to m make public the full affidavit without any redactions. but of course the doj opposed the affidavits release making these broad claimsg thaten releasing even limited parts of the affidavit could create dangers for witnesses or chill future cooperation and also reveal key investigative methods and for obvious dramatic effect, they threw in reference to nationaley d secury implications that are at stake. none of that, however, seemsiv compelling given what's at stake here. ub the public's right to know,lo along with the need to address public skepticism about this case weighed in favor of releasing the entire affidavit

,no question, and doing it immediately. and not just the affidavit, the security footage at mar a lago that was subpoenaed as well. we want to see that dragging this through the midterms with dribs and drabs being leaked to keyps media figures. a we know who they are, likeus the amorphous references to nuclear documents that's designed to do one thing to distract and frighten the voters as they head tote the pollsol in key house and senate races. to me, it's also obvious att, this point. now on the transparency issue, the angle is pretty surprised that the trump legal team chose not t to file its own motion for a complete unsealing aaron. eeblake at "the washington post" has a theory as to whyhy saying seeing the document remain mostly sealed is probably bestob case scenario for donald trump. hisrump supporters and manyre republican lawmakers declared the investigation an abuse of power before havingpured a virty any information about it.

learning what prompted it would only force trump and his allies to account for actual evidence.l well, joining us now to clear things up is trump lawyer christina bobino. christina, thanks for being here tonight. youhris are in court today when the magistrate ruledgi i'm curious about why you chose not to file an official motion or join another motion arguing this affidavit issue given the president's desire as hel stated it, for full transparency. he did say that you're exactly right. we believe that judicial watch and some of the other parties actually had argued it quiteel welll and we believe it was vey interesting and somewhat encouraging that you had parties from ti both sides of the aisle. of course, liberal media outlets coupled with a conservative watchdog group really together on the same side. and so we were curious to seet how that played out. of course, reserving the rightg to try e something else in the future if we want to. but we really just chose to see

how it would play out. well, i understand that you chose to do that, t but i'm i'm wondering, are you notrn concerned because you didn't join any of these motions for,of again, the full release of this affidavit that you're then waiving the possible objections to the way redactions are being done by the justice department later on ? because you we were told today,t nor did you join anyhe of these motions. they're going to redactre a all this stuff and i'm not sure what grounds are going to have at this point, having waivedfi your right to file those motions. well, we would maintain that we haven't waived our right and that still is maintains we need to wait and see. oi i can't be certain at this point because we haven't seen the affidavit. we certainly haven't seen the redactions and how it's going to play out. we'll be making that decision as it comes out. we got to see it. we haven't seen it. it has been under seal. soso i don't know. wewe can't say, well,

they spokesman for president trump taylor budha, whiches i believe spoke out today and madede another comment. yeah, yeah. about how the democrats have a pension for using redactionsns to t actually hide the government's deception and corruption. just like they did with the russia hoax. so he's obviously concerned about this. that is a. concern. and certainly the judge giving the department of justice basicallyme carte blanche anie opportunity to redact however they want whatever they want. it is a concern.rn i mean, i think that's a fair c concern and something that we a will have to deal withnd and figure out as it comes outes and as we see what happens on the issue of the footage of where the documents were stored ,how much is beings made of this footage that was actually subpoenaed by the justice department? do you havethe any insight into

what they claim was some big concern about this, what they understood to be secure, a secure area such that it would necessitate eight this nine hour raid of mar a lago? i have no idea why they were particularly concerned about it. they had come out of the department of justice and the fbi had come out and seen it firsthand. they've seen it in personrsnre and they knew exactly what it was and where it was and how it was secureded. and so the idea that they needed to raid it to see it again after president trump himself had told them that, yout know, you'ree welcome to come back if you feel b the need to come back . soso i think that'sa a bit disingenuous. ef i thinkti it's typical of leftit media to come up with someme salacious story that doesn'tg really make a lot of sense.. itwo kind of leaves people scratching their head wondering what's going on , hopefully hoping that it'll just move past it. was it was there a limited number of people who had accesso to thatom storage room? it seems like a pretty

important room, right, since they've made suchh suc a big def it and have the lock on it and so forth. solimi there were a limited numl of people who could go in and out. yes. or? have access to really mar a lago. it is certainly mar a lago is secure in and of itself. just getting onto the compoundrd is hard. and then it was a locked door and getting back down intocu the basement. there's security. you can't just walk down therehe only members of staff can get there. and then there's only one key. phil. yeah,ed it's a very limited number of people that have access down there. and it was enough to where president trump believed our our team believed that itse was secure enough. they asked for f one more at another lock, whichch we did, and then for whatever reason, they decided that they still needed to raid the place and only one or two people had t access to that room. toha your knowledge, that'sng my understanding. i mean, i would have to check with the maintenance of that a area, but my understanding is very small number of people that could get in therere.

are you are you now asking a the court? rei believe today i believes i read that you guys are asking for that footage too also be released. correct. am i correct in that? i i would have to double check or not, but i think they're comfortable with that. that's a lot of hours of a lot of hours of footage to release. christina, i know you've had a long day. weg really appreciate your joining us tonight. thankk you so much. and joining me now is mike davis, article three project president, a former clerk for justice neil gorsuch and david shewn, former impeachment lawyer for president trump. mike , let's f f start with you was it a mistake for the trump legal team not to join one ofw these motions or file one today? you heard what christina said. they thought thesedo other motions were well done, well written and feel a need toly actually make a case for themselves mes. >> >> well, i would say this. the president's personal property was president c have the absolute constitutional authority as commander in chief r to declassify any record he wanted as the supreme court i

confirmed in 1988.n and department of navy versus egen. the president alsoo had the absolute sole statutoryhe authority to determine whether these records or personal records thatsona belonged to hir presidential records that go to the bureaucrats. the archives then come back to his library as confirmed by a an obama i appointed judge in 2012 dealing with judicial watch. his lawsuit against clinton regarding the tapes in his sock drawer. er so this is clearly an unlawful that was clearly legal groundsen to challenge this raid. wege also have a biased judge, judge bruce reinhardt, recused on june 22nd in trump's lawsuit civil lawsuit versus hillaryry clinton. . we we have his 2017 facebook post where he has a clear judicial bias against president trump. ialhe's president trump personally. so he violated the u.s. code and can in to carnita way of the judicial candidates he

needs to recuse from this case. so ife i were advising trump's legal team, i would say file a ruleld. forty one g motion under the federal rules of criminalf procedure to return the property and then you can duke out these legal battles right now. right.o and also a special master right . david would alsoo be helpful here in order to act on these objections that they are going to have over the release of some of these documents and then redactions t. there was no motion filed to call for a special master in this case, which and i look, it's been a while since i did is kind of of law. but that would be one of the first things i would asksk for. i agree 100%. i a they say they team in place, but clearly team team is an effective nor is it appropriate from an ethical perspective are still all part of the same doj, same team, have the same agenda and so on . so it should be a speciale. master appointed.

but you know, laura , you started out this piece, i think making the most important point. this is shouldn't be looked at in a vacuum. a longer partul ofdn program. it it's the political weaponization of the justice department. wen say these things lightly. my father was an fbi agent. aha i have great respect.ve the agency traditionally. but here i don't think you can minimize the fact that lisaac monaco is a primaryo figure in the justice department,e i'm sure involved in these decisions. s.she's an andrew weissman colleague, came up through a the ranks with him, worked with him, close with themnd. we know what the agenda is forss andrew weissman and so on . i'm very, very extraordinarily disappointed in merrick garland because here soraor continues to make these statements like he did in abandoned case that this action reflects the equal application of the law. that's just nonsense. wewe know that it doesn't we knw the examples that it's a distinguished by and it's reprehensible, frankly. but the bottom line is , as you said from the start, we're not just speculating here aboutbl possible misconduct in

the past. we have the fisa warrant situation. we know the misrepresentations and omissions were made to the most secretive in the most secretive and intrusive process in the country, the fisa court. so the american people deserve transparency here. open how we have to. yeah, yeah. they can't hide behind the national security implications. this broad language can i see rt through that, mike .nt and we should point out that the national archives official who notified the dojs, the probe, they declined to do the same thing overr the clintoe emailsr, thousands and thousande of clinton emails.ma so s david ferreiro said that he didn't believe it was appropriate or necessary too notify the doj about hillary clinton's emails back in 2015. these are precisely the reasons mike white, while millions of americans think there is a double standard here,he david just referred to it. soer i know mike pence thinks nobody should criticize the thei the fbi. mike , but come on . >> yeah, and they're trying to

turn this. c if you're criticizing the political leadership of the fbi, they're trying tobl deflect the blame on like we're criticizingamam the rank and fia fbi agents were not were criticizing chris wray or attorney general merrick garland, deputy attorney general lisa monaco, assistantra attorney general for the criminal division. can police were it's the political leadership of the biden justice departmentersh who have weaponizes politicized. the justice department has nothing to doolnt with the rank and file of the fbi. david , l how concerned are you ? w week i'd say that this parts of this affidavit, it looks like limited parts will be released. but don't you know you imagine, guys, that those that releaseel is going to be just one big sharpey like across the page? everything's going toer be redacted. you're going to get very little information in my view. ll all going to look bad for trump. that's all. that's my prediction. i think we'll see the forward, as david written out, possibly . i don't think it'll go much

beyond that. but this isn't this is going to have to be revisited. i think you're going to have to go probably above judgear reinhart's said. i've had judgedt runad out of the case down there before. i think, you know, it's goingly to have to go to a district judge eventually. but i think it's a toyed arounda today idea. should they filero a motion fori return of property? they know what's in that stuff better than anybody else. yes. they should have to say yes, they should. there's about 10 motions that b need to be filed in this case. you know, do you agree with me, mike ? i mean, weeu got you've got to have a flurry motions to respond to the the full force of the federal government coming down on onee man. i think relying on you know, i love judicial watch. i love it. butck you can't just piggyback on their motions. they've got to know that t the former president, the united states is taking this very seriously and that's my view. know, i'm just so talked about this.s. mike andid david , thank you both. joining me now is former secretary of state mike pompeo, distinguished fellow at newst son institute, fox contributor.

mr. secretary, great toto see you. i want to jump right in.n. i democrats are so worried, are they not, about protecting democracy's around the world? you know, we all are. but when it comes to what'ss happening here in the united states , apparently the government will just use every bit of power at its disposal to target one man who is a likely 2020 four presidential candidate. what are your what are your thoughts on what you're hearing tonight? are you got it exactly right. there's there's no rules right . this is just about power. and they ask that to give give them the benefit of the doubt. the talking about democracy and equal justice under the law. but we've seen it right. we saw my predecessor, cia, p jim brennan, politicized weaponizes the cia. jim comey, who was my counterpart at fbi whenho i was cia director at the beginning ofto my time, we saw him take notes. welcome to the press. we've watched the justice department under merrick garland go after parents oftila terrorists who are just trying to makes sure their kids go to school. there is no reason to n give thm the benefit of the doubt.

it has not been remotely equal. and what they did at mar a lago that runs just square against the central thesis , which is about transparent equal application of the law in the united states , especiallyut when youas do it against someone who was your former and could potentially be soon, could be again your political opponent, we don'tic see this is america. this is not something thatng should go lightly and it is bigger than what just happened in florida last week. i mean, mr. secretary,ee we had hillary clinton's people destroying thousandsng and thousands of emails. this t is when donors to the clinton foundation were trying to get in to talk to mrs. clinton. you a secretary of state. imagine if you had done anything approaching what was going on when she was secretary of state. i wouldn't evenve be talking to you right now. whyhy i put you in riker's island. i mean, it's justt crazy. so that's why there's a double standard here that, you know, national archive didn't have any problem a with that. apparently the goodness or you know, i was you don't i was in

the middle of that.t, i was on the benghazi committee with trey gowdy and jordan. g we were working to try and get access to her e-mails and her server, everyone admits hasry high level classified information. we didn't we didn'ton rate heren home. weti didn't send the justice department. we tried to work through the problems that ince t wri the tradition of america they have violated these most basic understandingscaed. as your point is well taken.ch i hades my wife giving speeches for five hundred thousand dollars a throw all acrossld the world to foreign governments while i was serving as secretary of state. i have an orange jumpsuit and a prisoner. no, and i you know, looking at you and your colors tonight, your mike. not y it's not that you're not you're more of a darker hued person. i know you were interviewedvi by the january six commission. what can you share about your lovely time with them? you know, they were they were chasing which this was this was a far field wandering interview. i spoke the truth to them. t i can't tell you the details. laura .or they were looking for discussions about the twenty fifth amendment discussionsssio

that i never seriously undertook with any off my counterparts. they were they were looking toor build a storyline, the conclusion of which wasio already read . whatreaction to mike pence set up in new hampshire about how people shouldn't criticizeze , be careful about criticizing the fbi because that's criticizinghat the rank and file. you know, i like mike penceh, very much. he's an old friend going i back 20 plus years. but i was lit a little surprised by that. your reaction to what heat, r all have friends. i've got two folks who used to work on my congressional staff who are young, but fbi agents all across america, good people, hard working folks that care about america. but tha when you have a politicd leadership, when you have mccabe lying, losing a job being the spokesperson on cnn, when you see the fbiit engaged in this kind of activity, it's so deeply troubling. one could easily, easily take on the fbiy leadership without t maligning in any way those folks are out there trying tohoa

keep our streets safe and keepme us safe from crime a all across the country. what were you doing the night that liz cheney lost the what'ss the race in wyomingor now? are you surprised by that in any way? shape or form? i mean, obviously you were friendly with the chinese as many of us were, but that is the end off that era is not? yeah, i think it is . it's from it's from a time gone by in the sense she spent her entire time representing the people of wyoming, going after a single individual instead of representing the people of wyoming. and they responded onsi they responded pretty clearly, pretty sharply and pretty dramatically. let'sfof secretary, it's great to t see you tonight. thank you so much.o. and withth all the polls pointig to a massive red wave and thema house races in november, doss yu think really think that the bigi tech oligarchs are just going to stand by , just let this election play out? mollie hemingway, victor davis, hanson react to silicon valley's frightening plans to changege perhaps your vote after this.

>> i'm steve johnson, founder of idealism. with rising interest rates and inflation, there's a lot of uncertainty in today's real estate market now more than ever selecting the right real estate agent can be the difference in tens of thousands of dollars and your pocket experience matters that ideally agent will connect you with top local agent to get you the best result for as low as 100% with ideal agent, we were able to get one of the top agents in our area and he made the process extremely comfortable. he was very professional and his expertise just helped immensely. and through that process we were able to save twenty three thousand dollars. we've helped thousands of home sellers and buyers get five star results, ranking as number one in real estate on trust. it really shouldn't be as simple as it is because we just picked up the phone calls, ideal agents. they put us in touch with our agents and they handled everything. there's no obligation or a prank call today or is it

ideal ? agency.com, are you ready for a fresh new bathroom shower for now is the best time for 50% off installation and no interest and no payment for one year. hi , i'm christina and it's time to flip your old worn out bath or shower with jacuzzi baths remodel. today everyone knows the jacuzzi brand. they're the most trusted name in water for over sixty years. but did you know they can install a gorgeous bath or shower that building? incredible. and as little as one day. it's no stretch and no mess with a lifetime warranty. now let's talk beauty. you deserve to start and end your day in a beautiful space that feels great and it's custom designed just for you. so call or go online now to see the christina preferred designs like narnian farms in urban. now that the total beauty that i love at a price you can afford. and how about safety like an ultra low profile, easy entry shower complete with grab bars and a custom designed state. you deserve safety and peace of

mind without sacrificing style because with all the worries and daily, taking a shower shouldn't be one of them. every time i stepped over my i worked on my phone. i don't have those years anymore. jacuzzi remodel. give me a gorgeous shower. thanks to ivan trying to get him to remodel that fast. for years i called and they just one day and at a price he could afford with one cost jacuzzi bath remodel, you can effortlessly transform that old ugly eyesore into the sons and daughters shower of your dreams that you'll love for years to come call or go online to jacuzzi's after model .com now to get up to 50% installed. plus eskow, you may qualify for no interest and no payments for twelve months. and when you call right now we'll give you an additional safety upgrade. three go to jacuzzi baths, remodel .com or call 800 six to eight zero seven seven nine . that's eight hundred six two

eight zero seven seven nine call now and the number of in order for small businesses to thrive, they need to be smart. efficient. agile. and that's never been more important than it is right now. so for a limited time, comcast business is introducing small business savings. call now to get powerful internet for just 39 dollars a month. with no contract. and a money back guarantee. all on the largest, fastest reliable network. from the company that powers more businesses than anyone else. call and start saving today. comcast business. powering possibilities.

as a business owner, your bottom line is always top of mind. so start saving by switching to the mobile service designed for small business: comcast business mobile. flexible data plans mean you can get unlimited data or pay by the gig. all on the most reliable 5g network with no line activation fees or term contracts... saving you up to $500 a year. and it's only available to comcast business internet customers. so boost your bottom line by switching today. comcast business. powering possibilities. now eight hundred nine zero one five nine nine seven oh the big tech sensors poised to strike again just in time for t the midterms and during covid remember they silenced doctors who dared to question masking vaccine mandates.

some of them appeared on the show. well, today they're threatening to do the same to tampo down the vast amounts of what they claim are online rageam fis being expressed online after the málaga raid. nowress axios is happily reportg that big tech will act to ensure that they won't be caught flat footed again by the deluge of disinformation aimed at delegitimizing the election process. maytasilehe is putting a block w ads the week of the midterms and it's vowed to remove any disinformation. that's facebook and twitter is enforcing its civicen integrity policyfo. sounds like something out of china and labeling what they call questionable tweets. axios and sadly declared even the most careful defensive tactics by the most popular social mediaia firms won't be able to halthe the spread of election misinformation, includinggsp the big lie. here now, mollie hemingway, she editor at the federalist fox news contributor, and victor davis hanson, senior fellow att hoover. molly, of course, they all have to seize on the dangers of

giving a forum for the big lied to justify these roles that they've taken on as proxy censors for biden. but don't you think this is kind of ironic because ironic as the biggest lie is the claim by facebook, twitter and googleit that they'e somehow unbiased in simply s workingc for the public good. these social media companiese are a huge threat to public p discourse, to political debate . they meddled heavily inth the twenty twenty election. they even meddlede in previous elections, but they really ramped it up in 2020.t they censor effective voices t that go against what they would like people tohe say. they did platform people for sharing true information such a as what they claimed was misinformation and disinformation. the story of the bidennd family corruption in the hunter biden laptop. they also do things like an privilege, democrat communications, bringing that to the top of email inboxes while suppressing republican communications. they do. ic ci when you think back to the

whole russia collusion hoax, which is all baseded on supposedly cas like one hundred thousand dollars in facebook ads that russia spent there is no comparison to what social media companies did toia help joe biden win and help other democrats win and to harmh the chances of republicans. this is a you know, they'ret announcing they're doing it again. it's a major problem. >> well, victor, the heritagen foundation, just for an example of how this might work. the heritage foundation posted on their facebook page about that irs job post that had required knowledge of how to use deadlyed force.e right. so sure enough, the truth police slapped, quote, missingel context label on that. i have a feeling we'ret going to see a lot more of thatm in the coming months. was it a fact that they asked w that you had to, you know,ea be willing to use deadlydl force as an irs agent or not?e the fact is , yes, they did. when you actually publicize it,h they slap you with a labele.

yeah. you know, the relaxium article was disinformation about disinformation. they said we don't want t to be caught flat footed. we're not prepared. but in fact, molly ball, a progressive journalist in time magazine, gushed afterer the election how they weren't caught flat footed, thatfl they had preemptively decided censor things that were dangerous to the biden campaign to work with corporate america and big labor a to tone down the protest before the election. maybe ele incite them after bidd were behind and toens democratic activists and legal pacs to go into key states andst to sue to change the voting laws and then of course, to have over four hundred million dollars in quote unquote dark money to absorb the work of the registrars. and then it workedse. ke and thend, not only work that worked so well, if they couldn't keep quiet about it, and they bragged w and bragged. so now they're worrieded that everybody's read that and are prepared. s

so now they're saying, well, we're very naive. we don't wanton to get caught flat footed. but the article and their gosh after the election was how post facto and unprepared donald trump was and how naive when he didn't have any idea what he was up against us and that wasea their arrogance was really overwhelming. family. another thing that's happening on this misinformation deal also written about interestingly in access is the democrats are actually trying to get big tech to label as disinformationfo republican outreach for hispanic voters, which obviouslyrmut is going really w. and it's's couched in this like ridiculous nielsen report from last year, basically saying that it found thaty websitespp more popular with latinos in the u.s. and other groups makes them witin more susceptible boto exposure to misinformation and to sharing. 28% of content latinos see on news websites they most frequently visit wasth flagged as bias conspiracy based or

pseudoscientific. molly, what are they talking about? except that republicansdo are doing really well with hispanics, so it mustl,n a misinformation. that's what we're up against in the midterms. yeah, i was reading this second axios article which was basically democrat propagandaa saying that it was misinformation for hispanic voters tosi believe that democrats weren't helping out the economy. i mean,no first of all, that's just wrong. democrats are in complete control of the federal government and they are directly responsible for so many of the economic f problems are happening. but even ifu you disagree with that, it's just that it'sus a disagreement. it's not misinformation. it's not disinformation, misinformation and disinformation have become democrat code words for things we wish people weren't saying because they hurt our political chances or hurtec our political power. and this is again, just hi a problem because the republican party in the last few years has become much more multi racial, much more working class. they have political power. they'reewo growing and peoplee

on the left are worried aboutt that. and so they're trying to label just effective communication or even factsts as misinformation and disinformation is the same victor as you. pointed out many times, facebook, mark zuckerberg, what did he invest? four hundred and nineteen million dollars in his education efforts, voter education efforts to watch for all that misinformation he was combating ? yeah, he absorbed the work of w the local and state governments. but you know how it all endedll up. laura wasut the bottom line was nearly 70% of the votes for the first time in american history were not cast on election day and atan the error rate in particular, states had gone from two to three percent when the absentee and early balloting was less than half of that, it went down to zero point one and point two. so then the left said, well, the more votes you cast, not on election day, that is you have to fill them out.

of course you'll have less thrown out. it was absurd. and then mark zuckerberg is already prepping the battlefield when he says, you know, i'm not going to do it in 2020 four or 2020 two. what i did in 2020, which if you follow big tech, that meanst of course i am,er but i'm going to be smarter about this time. and so they won they and their own words they were very successful without strategy. that nexus of corporatism, the law, the media and big tech and big money and they want to do itin again. they're going to try to do it again. republicans better be ready>>ra: this time. they better not be caught flat.. molly, victor, thank you. now the bush administration's wonder drug biffy covid not me can give you a second bout of it, but it can also come with ai distasteful side effect. i'm going tost w give you a hin hot garbage plus some suggested reformss to help rochelle walensky overhaul the cdc. my medicine cabinetki is next. >> data at same time, secret

conspiracy to conceal the truth . you can try to control the world with help from the devil. and it's a society, a secret. you have people with these large groups and unless you remember, you have no idea what you were going schools are with . what's the little determinants in divorce website? they're creating environments that's designed to draw in dark for so extreme over the past 40 years, a thousand animals have been killed in a very strange way, the greatest crimes streaming down on nation

. everyone on mike huckabee, former governor of arkansas, part time musician and longtime customer relaxium sleep. and i'm here with my good friend country music legend larry gatlin. and larry, a few months ago you asked me, does that relaxium really work? i took it you were to try to guess what relaxium actually works. i loved it when you called me and told me that it works the very first night for you and it is work every night since the call today for your 30 day free trial and one hundred percent money back guarantee relaxium sleep doesn't need a prescription is 100% drug free and it's not habit-forming? take it from larry gatlin and get some sleep with relaxium sleep. all right. call now relaxium sleep is giving away 1000 bottles. call and get your very own risk free bottle of relaxium sleep now call 877 fifty one twenty five 800 790 seven fifty

one twenty five simultaneously orangeman northrop's. i'm not going to get any when confronted with that on monday ,september 19th on fox and it wasn't even one any time. each year americans waste twenty one billion dollars by overpaying car insurance. that's why i went to the ziba .com because well every company claims to save you money on car insurance. zebra shows you who actually can't compares car insurance at the uber .com today during the perfect gift, the jury exchange has done events for one sixty nine tennis bracelets for ninety nine 1/2 carat halo rings 590 two carat, three stone rings twenty four and one carat studs 590 by direct the jewelry

exchange to presented present price price is also favorite short movies including the two the original shortsightedly that goes on to not attorney spokesperson. this is a paid advertisement for legal services sponsored by attorney andrew vinyasa if you are a loved one , resided at marine corps base camp lejeune any time between nineteen fifty three in nineteen eighty seven and were later diagnosed with cancer. parkinson's disease or other serious health effects called aviemore group. right now, even if you were denied justice in the past, the recently enacted pact act provides a new path forward to secure significant compensation. but you need to apply to find if you qualify, done with a nine zero three four five five

eight sell your home is expensive and stressful. so we set out to create a better home selling experience with a network of the most successful real estate in america. it'll sell your home for as little as a two percent commission. the icing on the cake would be ideal agent was that we saved twelve thousand dollars information. we would definitely ideally and it got the whole process was so positive. excellent, excellent service getting right to the point hiring ideal agent . i wish we would have done that sooner and we would have saved six months of time and mortgage payments that would have probably never happened. we would have just come within first. they were so stress free . the whole process was amazing and i would definitely recommend that. we certainly recommend that you be reaching out to our older friends. it's just a great experience. we are not a discount brokers. these are topical agents that'll get you the best results. t

i think our public infrastructure in the country was not upp to the task off handling this pandemic. wemi made some pretty publicet mistakes and we need to own them. >> it's noo. big deal . vague admission by the cdc director only two years too late after onl lockdown's destrd the education of countless young people after they trashed our economy, we saw drug w alcohol abuse, depressione skyrocket. but as long as youu make a vagua admission, no problem. now to help dr. leonski out with her upcoming overhaul, the cdc. i phoned various members fromd a last two years of our medicine cabinet and they came upht with some useful reforms that she should put into place immediately. first and foremost,t,y. fire everybody at the top, including herself. okay, next, only get funding t for the cdc fromhe congress. al no special interest moneye because they have a stake in policy debates.

give up all of their patents. yes, the cdc owns patents and you've got to have complete data transparency. that's justt the start. joining me now, dr. j. bhattacharyya, stanford school of medicine, as well as dr. peter mccullogh, epidemiologist, author of the courage to face covid 19 . dr.u, b , let's start with you. doef you have any reforms tos add to that list?g i know it's a long list that we've all been compiling, but that'spili just the start. i mean, i think for one stop telling us commit to never telling a lie, noble orno otherwise ever again. ldo not use your power to manipulate human behavior just tell people the truth. don't lie about the natural immunity. don't liebout about whether the vaccine stops transmission. don't lie about mass . vsi tell the absolute truth abouthe all of these things based on what the science actually isa saying. that wouldll be that would be a really good reform. i think to start with . well, and i think that when we look at this, dr. michael , over the last few years, it really it's it's so

overwhelmingly fraudulent what was done to the american people. you were t at the receiving end of a lot of the campaigns of i colonization and it's still happening toont many of the peoe all of us know across the country to doctors and health care professionals who are being harassed and penalized for being right. dr. mcculloh, it is true americans and physicians like myself have progressively lost their confidence in the multibillion dollar agencyhe from these erraticse yet dictatorial recommendation on contagious control, vaccinationda and the lack of nt only data transparency but data analysis. a the cdc and fda old america,we a monthlyd data analysis on safety of the vaccines they should haven had external day safety monitoring board is in place. they should have externalld h oversight in multiple aspectse of the agency and i completely

agree everybody needsd to go and we need to install regularan regular and rigorous oversight from congress and the senate. now dr. harvey is retiring from yale, this weekend's big party for him. i'm going to be phoning in so i can't actually go. but he has some interesting comments. dr. bhattacharjee, i'd like you to reactestisld to about the ags internal review that wilonsky is talking about. o he says that she failed to address the industry subservience and epidemiologic incompetence of what's at the heart of all of this. g how could the cdc get so much science so wrong with this lamew apology? whatever this qualifies as dr. macalaifie? yeah, i think a big problem was all social distancing they were doing themselves. yous know, they weren't meeting . they were trying to do work by webex for a couple of years. the cdcth is full of wonderful w and talented physician scientistsd ta, but they got ino a direction that went horribly

wrong and i think we do need ton do a deep postmortem on what happened with the agency. well, the best way the new another report that just came out on august 19th, it basically implies that the mandates that they put out based on this two dosed vaccines were useless, thats. the boostes themselves wane and efficacy over time. soso there is a limited value in limited duration value of all, of this. but again, people are still following dr. bhattacharyya this original guidance on the vaccines as if they reduce transmission. but the cdcce is implicitly admitting now that they don't stop transmission of the virus. that was the entire basis of the vaccine mandates, were they not? fcistill going on for the cmwmw and for health care facilities all over the united states and schools and collegesli. hi

i mean,nk i think the cdc hasdc caused untold harm by basically not actually acknowledging the scientific fact that the vaccine doesn't stop transmission. and you're absolutely right,topo laura . it's the basis for all these mandates on which so many people have lost their jobs. it's absolutely destroyed confidence in public health. a and , you know, i think it's also had the knock-onof consequence of reducing public trust in public and other vaccines. vaccines are actually quite important for public health. ici think is a complete disaste. it's not enough just to apologize or to acknowledge wrongdoing. it's just that there needs to be a n fundamental overhaul. dr. michael , i mean, we have doctors, pediatricians still badgering parents every timeto y you go in toou get a checkup. have you given your kid a vaccination? i mean, maybe could be likeld six month old and they're pressuring these parents about these vaccinations. i mean, that's border that's borderline malpractise in my view. the doctors have clearly drunk the kool-aid on the vaccines.

i think the doctors actually are a big part of the problem of this this kindof of negative legacy effect we've had on the failed vaccine program. doctors really need to come in line. the cdc has basically said a vaccinated person is completely indistinguishable from an unvaccinated person. right. we need a to drop these mandates m and do a thorough review ofw what's happened or the lawsuits . okay, dr. vitória, dr. macala,ws to my absolute favorite thank you. and he will give y it numbers ae suddenly not low enough anymore numbers. that's right. enthe left's new target math i.m.f., a.b. is herey on that stupidity next. great feats deserve great help . get them keep pens up. he only topical prescription treatment indicated to help reduce diabetic nerve pain of the fauci grapeseed every day.

ordinary things that seem extraordinary when your feet feel better, you tend to is different. one thirty minute application can provide up to three months of diabetic foot pain relief and at work with or without other pain medication. q10 that can only be applied by your health care provider sentenza can cause severe irritation of eyes, mucous membranes, respiratory tract and skin patients may experience pain and burning upon application and following removal of reduced sensation in the feet may occur. the most common side effects for redness, pain or kitchen work utensils upon if any of these side effects become severe, tell your doctor immediately to your doctor about how times may help reduce pain in your feet so you can get on to your own grapeseed stupenda breakbeats deserve great fts shway .

we will come to an emergency in the absence to see one season premiere september 19th on fox watch any time all seasons available on who knew i visited dry eye drops me rehydrating polymers, moisturizing hyaluronic acid and revitalizing trailor to reduce dryness, discomfort and strength.

i did this. we see a better way. men over forty five you have a frequent urgent need to day at night. i have good news for setting the system and outpatient treatment, said simply reflectance so great flow with no cut. yes, no side effects, no more serious infection. coming in here. let me ask a neurologist about your work. all eight hundred seventy five to eleven today. one of my favorite supplements is general turmeric. turmeric helps with healthy joints and inflammation support unlike regular turmeric supplement kyun also pure absorption helps me get the full benefits of turmeric. the brand i trust is qnol reporting on the issues you care about. there's a lot to cover. woke m.

i kid you not. that's what's happening in minneapolis right now. they're public schools ares, going to spend more than two million bucks to incorporate ethnic, racial and cultural diversity into k through five math starting in the falll by adding cultural and linguistically responsive materials. oftentimes in mathematics, pictures, images, words matter. we are seeing patterns and trends, for example, of animals being represented in

the mathematics of the curriculum. our studentste are not animals. wewe need to have direct connections to how mathve is alive and well inei their daily practice and so things we were really sensitive to the images that were being presented, oh, keep that woma k away fromee education. joining me now on the phone of a former left wing activist now frager impersonality. amela, you keep thinking i've heard it all, but is math not math anymore? it has a cultural responsive role to play. apparently it is not math anymore. localness must w be it must be injected into thing that we hold dear . oh, dear . as a society. actually , what's happened, hel ? and if you want to look into the courage to go and read the pathway to equitable math instruction, that is where a lot of this is started and it'sth actually it's actually been heavily funded by the bill and melinda melinda gatesill and why bill gates, a a man who has gotten so much money and power off the back of

his mathematics has done this., i cannot say, say, but when you go in books about how math is used as an extension ofs white supremacy and it says that of being a poor perfectionist or saves only one right way to answer a question ,even objectivity is nowiv deemed to be anit extension of whites of white supremacy. >> you know what's really cool like. angela right now, at least from my perspective,t your echoing a little bit. it's a almost sounding like a this is like a culturally responsive, responsive segment because it's a little bit of ou a yeah. it's a little thing goingnd on here. it's pretty cool. all right.o sai want to say this. the free speech organization called speech first. they just released a report finding out among freshman college orientations less than discuss free speech while 90% discussed diversity, equity and inclusion. this comes as we're learning that the university of oregon

subjects its faculty to a deep commitment test before hiring and promoting staff members. amela, it's clear , you know, colleges and universities from admissions applications to assign to hiring. it's all work all the time with rare exceptions. youu are absolutely right in oregon and oregon is the perfect state and its governor has decided decidedng proficiency rates for states for graduating high school longer have to be proficient in math and reading writing to graduate in oregon. and apparently you don't a have to be proficient in education to get higher education in oregon anymore. 4 f1 it's great to see you. i'm not sure what's happening with the audio, but this is live tv. thisth t is what happens. all right. i have a a message to everyone, including people right here on this network. this is going, to t be brutal. they're celebrating the firing of someone over at cnn. now, my response might surprise

you. >> so that's why you're watching me. this is how we

................................ ................................ ................................

>> all right. let me just say no one somebody >> no one should b dancing on the grave of someone who just lost his job. for everyone laughing at brian stelter, i want you to know that no job is everything. everyone is replaceable. everyone makes mistakes. even me. he is a butte. maybe we can ask brian stetler? you see, it happens to the best of us. i'm feeling a little nostalgic about brian. who was this well-known shoe list member of the media i spotted on the train yesterday? it was brian stelter. at first i was worried he was not amused because he tweeted out, i will admit to having sore feet if laura admits to taking creep shots. i did not take that shot. but someone on the train did and

a forward it to me. thanks for being a good sport, brian. a polite request, though. up at the station -- say of social order complete even with those cute little orange socks of you, please keep your shoes on and public. no bare feet on a train, plane. we don't want to see that. best of luck to you, brian. we hope you land on your feet. "gutfeld" next. fox news alert. the gloves are off between greg abbott and eric adams. more buses are packed with migrants arriving into century city leaving the mayor looking for an additional 5,000 hotel rooms to the house them you're watching "fox & friends first." i am carley shimkus. >> todd: nrm todd piro. that is expected to run into the tens of millions of dollars.