6:00 a.m. on both saturday and sunday we play our nation's anthem with viewer photos sent in just from our viewers on "fox and friends." if you don't catch it, because you're not up that early, dvr it and watch it. once you watch it, you are going to love it. this is "jesse watters primetime." "tucker carlson is up next. >> tucker: good evening. last night we told you the sad and bewildering story of dr. oz, the man with absolutely everything going for him, talent, decency, charm, money, name recognition, all the right endorsements, who is nevertheless losing by a big margin as a republican in what should be a republican wave election to a radical and incompetent democrat lieutenant governor, overseeing the decline

of the state, who's had a stroke, and can no longer speak in complete sentences. that's happening right now. dr. oz is getting crushed by a stroke victim, who was already crazy. it's bizarre. the question is, why is this happening? we spent time on the phone the other day, calling around to small political people to find out why it's happening. we heard a lot of theories, and they boil down to dr. oz is a bad candidate. mitch mcconnell said it's candidate quality. before we accept a republican can't win at a time when democrats have completely discredited themselves, it's worth pausing and asking exactly what does this mean. what is a bad candidate? there are no bad candidates? there's no bad candidates, they're just running on the wrong thing, talking about issues that people don't deeply

care about. a good candidate is the opposite of that, a candidate who promises to fix the problems that voters worry about the most. candidates like that tend to win elections because the message is bigger than the man. a candidate with a powerful message can overcome virtually any obstacle for multiple bankruptcies to universal media hostility to a dull orange skin tone. if voters believe you will make their lives better, they will vote you, period about. it's not complicated. unfortunately donors and party leaders complicate it, wanting candidates to talk about issues they care about, which are often very different from the issues that the public cares about. remember republicans used to yell at you about entrepreneurship, that's the most important thing. entrepreneurship? okay. sounds kind of amusing now, but basically that's still happening. consider pennsylvania, a state where dr. oz is now losing. what do voters in pennsylvania care about most? we haven't seen the most recent polls, but we would guess law and order is at the top of that

list. why do we think that? here's video from a story that a local television station, fox29, is doing tonight, about murder in philadelphia, the state's largest city. you can see the pictures on your screen right now. reporter chris o'connell went to a cemetery and asked how things were going. they said, quote, we can't dig graves fast enough. when was the last time you heard that? you didn't hear it during covid, the global pandemic, that was politicians told you it was the worst thing ever to happen to america. it wasn't the worst thing to happen to mechanic. people learned they had been lied to, and that's one of the reasons americans hate politicians, they're tired of the lying, and the same reason voters will tend to reward any candidate who tells the truth about what's happening and what actually matters. here's one thing that actually is happening, actually matters,

something that everybody sees, but that candidates virtually never mention, and that's stealing. suddenly there's a huge amount of stealing in the united states. it's everywhere. that's a problem because stealing is a crime, a moral crime. in fact, it's the first crime that most of us learn not to commit as children. don't steal. don't take what doesn't belong to you. it's immoral. it certainly is immoral. yet somehow in the last three years, our leaders, democrats mostly, but honestly some from both parties, leaders have decided stealing isn't a big deal. it's not really a crime. certainly not something we should be worried about. in a country this rich, with this much income inequality, how can you tell people not to take from those better off than they are? that's their attitude. it's a decadent attitude. it's what they really believe, even if they don't say it out loud. without a public referendum, the kind you have in a democracy, cities have decriminalized stealing. what's the effect of this?

more stealing. and stealing quickly metastasized into looting, and then social collapse. that's happening right now everywhere. here's a grocery store in los angeles. that's footage of criminals storming a 7-eleven. watch. >> tucker: that's l.a. could be anywhere. we saw that on the internet this morning, and we were shocked by it, transfixed by it really.

it's repulsive. there's no excuse for that. no one in that crowd needed what they stole. they didn't need newports to survive. they stole anyway. why? not because of us, but because of them. because they're greedy and piggish, their parents never told them not to, and most of all because they could. joe biden's justice department will never say a word about they did. criticizing theft is an offense against equity. that's happening. why isn't every republican in the nation running ads with that footage in it? no one is as far as we know. most are ignoring the chaos. that doesn't mean it is real. it is real. starbucks just closed 16 stores nationwide because of increasing theft. it's going unpunished. target just reduced its operating hours in six san francisco stores. they used to close at 10:00. now they're going to close at 5:00. why? because of crime, stealing. walgreens shut down 17 stores

altogether, losing an average of $45 million a day because of theft. what does that add up to? the disintegration of society. that's not an overstatement. robberies are up dramatically in new york. so bad in new york that grocery stores are locking antitheft cases. motor vehicle thefts are up by similar numbers. in los angeles, arrests for theft and motor vehicle thefts have been going down. oh, so the instance of crime rises but the punishment of crime falls. prosecutors in california have stopped enforcing the law. but it's not just california. it's at the federal level as well. joe biden's doj has done nothing to stop the crime wave. so it is accelerating everywhere. illinois and washington state, for >> along the gulf coast, security guards are shirk in

customers one at a time, because of videos like this, a handful of criminals coming in, making off with $100,000 of louis vuitton items. >> this may be the most brazen shoplift you'll ever see, after singling out a 70-inch tv, police say john lomax, the man in blue, puts the tv on a shopping cart, and starts to wheel it through seattle's downtown target. court documents say he's stole from this target 21 times before. >> suspense in san francisco, arms full of loot. >> a trio of thieves, violently smashing and grabbing $20,000 worth of watches. >> snatch and run, thieves snatching $90,000 worth of merchandise from louis vuitton in bellvue. >> he jabs at the employee, taking the bills from the register. the gunman takes the cash and runs out. looks like he's done it before. >> tucker: makes your heartbeat

faster watching this. what country is this? why is no one stopping them. you've seen videos like this, all over the internet. when there's a security guard, the security guard just stands there haplessly doing nothing. some are cowards probably. some of them aren't. none of them know, none of them believe, they'll be backed up by the government, local, state or federal, if they intervene and try to stop someone from stealing. so people steal with impunity. why wouldn't they? their parents tell them not to. what happens then? if you allow people to loot stores, it won't be long before they're sticking guns in your face and pulling the trigger. disorder aleads to violence every single time. we've seen this movie repeatedly. and once violence begins, and the state does nothing to stop it, in fact in some cases encourage it, what happens then? people become desperate and left with no other choice, they take the law into their own hands. that is already happening. we have law enforcement and

courts to prevent this, so people don't have to do this, but they're not functioning, so people are doing it. watch this las vegas smoke shop owner defend himself with a knife when a robber dressed in all black and a mask suddenly vaults the counter. >> tucker: we cut out the rest of it. he stabbed that man until he fell down and didn't resist. the store owner told reporters, no embarrassment, i don't think he planned on getting stabbed that day, but if you try robbing a store you're taking a risk. that's the message people who rob stores have forgotten, but

they're going to be reminded of it very soon as more store owners find they have no choice but to defend their lives and property with force, with knives or guns. that's going to happen. do we want that? in some cases, those people will be arrested, in other cases, they'll become local celebrities, but in all cases, we are putting the onus of law enforcement on the individual when that's the court duty of the state. the state has given up. again, in a lot of cases, in the case of the bid administration, they're encouraging it. so, again, more store owners are doing exactly what that man did, defending themselves and their livelihood. that's even happening in california, where despite the strictest gun control in the country, a man with a rifle tried to shoot have and skill a store owner in july. here's what happened next. >> pointed his gun directly at me. i fired. >> after taking on four armed robbers, 80-year-old craig cope

is back at work attainerko workt and liquor. four men backed into the plat pg lot with stolen weapons. inside he was alone, watching the surveillance cameras. he grabbed his shotgun, knowing he'd have to defend him. >> tried to hit what i was pointing at. >> one of the man was shot in the arm. you can hear him screaming in the video. >> he shot my arm off. >> tucker: so the biden administration is constantly lecturing you about civil rights. crime is the most basic violation of civil rights. they're doing nothing. if they cared, instead of sending tens of billions of dollars to corrupt oligarchs in ukraine, more money for

zelensky. the doj isn't even acknowledging this is happening. instead they're focusing all of their energy on phantom white supremacy threats, people who complain about the sexual mutilation of children. where's the other side? once again, if every republican office-seeker, every republican candidate in the united states, focused on law and order, and equality under the law, there would be a red wave. larry elder joins us now. he's a former candidate for california governor, the one we would have voted for, the host of "the larry elder show" on epic times. happy to see him. larry, thank you very much for coming on. why don't -- you live in a state, tried to fix it yourself, but live in a state where stores can't stay open because they're being looted. i don't even hear officeholders

even mention this. >> excellent epilogue as usual. three broad things. the first is police. police in city after city, whether it's l.a. or new york, they're demoralized by the lie they're engaging in systemic racism against minorities, using deadly force against minorities just because they're black. they're no longer engaging in proactive policing, not engaging in some form of stop, question and frisk, which happened under the giuliani regime in new york, that created a deep decline in crime. even rahm emanuel said the chicago police went fetal,k meaning they weren't acting with proactive policing. soft crime das. gavin newsom bragged during covid that he released 8,000 convicted falcons, some violent offenders, tucker, and the odds are that half will reoffended.

you have proposition 47 that allows you to steal 950 bucks, not just today, but per store, and you get caught, they write you a ticket as a misdemeanor and you don't go to jail. proposition 57, that allows a bunch of categories of crime to be called nonviolent. they include assault on a police officer. i kid you not. that's nonviolent. serial arson, nonviolent. rape of an intoxicated victim, nonviolent. as a result, you're finding a greater chance that the bad guy doesn't get caught. when the bad guy knows he's not going to get caught, crime goes up. if he knows he's not going to get convicted or incarcerated, crime goes up. they're not stupid. there's the breakdown of the family. you said parents, plural, are not telling them to steal. that assumes there are two parents. often it is the parent or the grandparent. 40% of all kids in america today enter the world, tucker, without a father married to the mother.

70% of black kids, hispanic kids, 25% of white kids. if you enter a world without a father married to the mother, you're more likely to drop out of school, commit crime and end up going to jail. a young black man is 8-10 times more likely to be murdered than a young white man. murder is the number one preventable cause of death for black men whereas accidents like car accidents and drownings are the number one cause and preventable deaths for young white men. a lot of this crime is taking place in the inner cities, the ghettos, the barrios, where the father is not there. >> tucker: i don't know why every republican in the country wouldn't be running on this. it's so obvious if this continues we'll be living in a completely different place that we don't want to live in. why don't they say that out loud? >> well, i ran for governor for california. it was a essential tenet of my campaign, but all the media wanted to talk about was whether

2020 stolen. i'm hear to talk about crime, bad schools. yeah, but do you think 2020 was stolen? i cannot create the filter. abc, cnn, "l.a. times," where i was called the black face of white supremacy, they didn't care that i wanted to talk about the crime. they wanted to talk about the fact that i was a republican, voted for trump, and had gavin newsom been recalled it would have been a republican takeover. that's all they care about. republicans in california are outnumbered 3-1, and. more and more of this crime is taking place in the suburbs, like beverly hills, hancock park. until and unless it happens, we'll still have the same old policy pushed the same old people. >> tucker: yeah. make them defend the looting of 7-eleven and every turn. you did this. can you defend this? of course they can't. larry elder, great to see you. thank you. >> my pleasure.

thank you. >> tucker: well, speaking of chaos, law enforcement has been suspended at our southern border, which is wide open. as a result last month alone, u.s. officials reported nearly 200,000 illegal immigrants at the border, just the ones being counted. by comparison, at the end of 2020, migrant encounters totaled 72,000 per month. some of these people are using military-style camouflage to enter the country, which is bizarre. >> tucker, we've seen illegal immigrants use all types of methods to disguise or camouflage themselves. now new pictures appear to show suspected illegal immigrants wearing gilley suits to blend into the desert. border patrol agents in the el paso sector arrested the three migrants in southern mexico. gilley is a type of material that blends into natural environments. military police, police, and hunters use them. fox news reached out for more information on those pictures.

this week the federal government announced there were 199,000 migrant encounters at the border in july. for a comparison, at the end of 2020, migrant encounters were around 72,000 per month, now skyrocketing to nearly 200,000 last month, bringing total number of encounters to a record 1.94 million this fiscal year, but sources tell fox news that number is now over 2 million. the biden administration claims the number of encounters is inflated under title 22 expulsions where migrants quickly cross back into the u.s. after being expelled under that covid-19 order. as we've been reporting, states like texas and arizona are moving migrants to other states, in cities like washington, d.c. and new york, as a form of protest to the federal government. tucker? >> tucker: matt finn, thank you so much for that. that gilley suit story is bizarre. the guy on the right looks european. what is this exactly? they can walk in.

why are they wearing camouflage. hopefully we find out more. the attorney general of the united states suggests it's a hate crime if you're against the sexual mutilation of children, but a lot of people are offended by this atrocity, being banned by social media. even the ymca. you can't go to the ymca. they're not backing down. we'll talk about it straight ahead.

every search you make, every click you take, every move you make, every step you take, i'll be watching you. the internet doesn't have to be duckduckgo is a free all in one privacy app with a built in search engine, web browser, one click data clearing and more stop companies like google from watching you, by downloading the app today.

duckduckgo: privacy, simplified. >> tucker: a hundred years ago it was considered progressive to raise the wages of america's middle class. now it is progressive to support the sexual mutilation and sexualization of children. that's progressive. as a result, all over the country, kids are being forced to attend drag shows, like this. does that offend you?

think that's inappropriate for children? don't say it, because thought crimes are now the real crimes. merrick garland's doj says it's a hate crime to say anything about what you just saw. some people are not intimidated. a coalition called gays against groomers has formed to stop the sexualization and abuse of young children. big tech companies have been tried to ban them. so after being criticized, twitter has just reinstated their account. jamie fowler is the founder of gays against groomers. thank you for what you're doing, jamie. on what grounds are you being banned? what was your crime exactly? >> thank you for having me, tucker. we were banned for hateful conduct, which they consider calling out child predators and abusers and people that want to sexualize them. they are i guess a class of

protected people on big tech. for speaking out against them and trying to protect children, we were taken down. we've been taken down three times in three months now. we're brand new. our coalition just started in june. they can't us a break here. >> tucker: so people are intentionally sexualizing children, which i thought was a crime, it's certainly a moral crime, but because you don't like it you're the dangerous one? >> exactly. in any moral society it would be criminalized, what we see happening. it should be criminalized. but that doesn't seem to matter. these people are going full steam ahead with their agenda, using our community, the lgbt community, using us as shields essentially, to continue to push this unabated. i decided that's enough. we're not going to let this continue anymore, because the vast majority of our community stands so strongly against this. we're just as disgusted by it as

everyone else. i think that our voices are going to be effective at putting an end to it. >> tucker: i hope you're right. i'm just wondering, what percentage of the american population, of any party, sexual preference or whatever, of all americans, 340 million, what merge are for this? >> right. i think it's a very, very small minority, especially with our community and the people outside of it, that use us to push the agenda. but i think they're so loud, that's all you see coming from our community, because they have the backing of big tech, woke media, woke corporations, and even this administration. so they have a big backing, you know. so if they want to get their point across, everybody that has some power in this country is going to help them do that. you know, we're growing incredibly fast. we're only three months old, but we have almost 170,000 followers. they can see how effective our voices from inside the community are going be to fight this. you know, they have censorship.

we have the majority of the population. so i think in the end we'll win. regardless of what they try to do to suppress our voices. >> tucker: totally right. like nancy pelosi, cnn, and media matters, are the only people in favor of this. >> pretty much. >> tucker: jamie, thank you. we always want to highlight the bravery of people who stand against the insanity who history will record as heroes. this woman is one of them, 80 years old, banned from stepping inside a ymca. why? because she dared to object when a male employee was assigned to watch little girls remove their bathing suits in the bathroom in the locker room. here's some of the footage from that on monday. >> you may have read some version of my personal

experience, a naked old lady in the women's shower room and what i saw that day. >> tucker: screaming at her. julie is the woman, the brave woman, on that video, and joins us tonight. julie, thank you so much. we're grateful you're joining us. why at this stage in your life are you taking it upon yourself to speak up against this in the face of what we just saw? >> i was in the shower. i saw that man in that women's suit, saw him watching little girls. you can't not act when you see

that going on. you must do something. >> tucker: bless you for doing that. that's exactly right. your moral sense is clear. i have no idea what your background is, but you have a clear sense of right and wrong. i wish more people had it. you tried to explain that in the video we just played. rather than listen to you, people screamed at you, appeared to come at you. have you noticed there's no conversation about this? >> it was a mob of hundreds of people that came streaming into this permitted gathering, and they kettled us. i think that's what you call it. they pushed, shoved. they knocked women to the ground. these are the men and supporters of men that apparently the ymca and the city want to allow into the women's dressing and shower area. i object. >> tucker: and you at the age of 80 were banned by the ymca?

it's hard to believe this is real. because you were taking a shower, there was a man in there, and they banned you, not him. a, is that true? and b, what ymca is this? >> yes, that's correct. i told that guy to get out of the shower. and then a staff member came around the corner, and i said to her, get him out of here. she said, that's discrimination, you're out of here for life, and i'm calling the cops. >> tucker: can you tell us what ymca? where did this happen? >> this happened in port townsend, on the olympic peninsula, in washington state. >> tucker: i hope they are punished for the way that they treated you. i appreciate your bravery and your forthrightness. >> well, i do too. we did try to get the police to come help us. they were standing across the street. they were told by a directive to

stand down. they did not come to help us. >> tucker: i hope they rot. julie, thank you for all you've done. thank you. good to see you tonight. >> thank you. >> tucker: we've nearly wrapped up our production of a new documentary called "transgresssive: cult of confusion," debuting on fox nation later this summer. pharmaceuticals have created drugs to treat alzheimer's. turns out they don't work, because they're based on a false premise. one drug that appears to be promising is never discussed. why is that? we'll tell you after the break.

>> tucker: if you're going to design a disease to hurt people, degrade people, stress families out, really make life very sad, it would be alzheimer's probably. and so there's a big push to try

to cure alzheimer's, or prevent it. so drug companies keep coming up with drugs to do that, billions have been spent on it, but those drugs don't work. you got to wonder why. to give you one example, the fda recently approved a alzheimer's drug, even though the fda's own advisory committee voted 10-0 to reject the drug. there is a promising approach to alzheimer's apparently. according to researchers at the cleveland clinic, viagra might be an effective treatment for the disease. you never hear that that. why is that exactly? dr. mark segal joins us to assess. you announced on this show the results of that study, which was remarkable as a nondoctor, cutting the risk of alzheimer's by 69%. that was the last i heard of alzheimer's of -- i mean use of

viagra for alzheimer's. why not? >> it devastates families. >> tucker: that's right. >> tuckter, i did announce on the show, that study from aging nature, over 7 million men were studied, and found a 69% decrease in alzheimer's over just six years. even more importantly, they showed improved brain growth and less gunking up of the brain, with neurofibertory tangles. it's dramatic. it works. the. it works because the way viagra works is that it relaxes smooth muscle that lines blood vessels. it improves blood flow to every area of the body. i think i know what you're getting at, which is it's a billion dollar industry, for one reason, just one reason, but you know what, it works for multiple reasons. it doesn't just work in men, tucker. you asked me that question before i came on. it works in women as well as

man. it decreases altitude sickness in women. if this was studied in women as well, you would find it decreases the risk of alzheimer's. it proves blood flow to the brain, it has a positive impact, and should be used right now for both men and women. we need further studies on this, but it's a hugely promising drug. very disappointing, but since this study came out a few months ago, there's been no progress. we need progress now. >> tucker: exactly. the results from my perspective seem miraculous. i appreciate the information. dr. segal, thank you. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: feels like the other day, the democrats were telling you that the united states postal service was going to rig the presidential election for donald trump. the postal service is now taking an active and explicit role in our elections, but not on behalf of trump. they've created a dedicated

division to handle, quote, election mail ahead of the 2022 midterms. why are they doing this? there's a fascinating story on this. chuck, thanks for coming on. what is this exactly? >> it's a concerning development, because the government unions that represent the postal workers always endorse democrats, the further to the left the better. we have evidence that they mess with elections, they mess with election mail. now, of course, mail-in ballots are taking on a greater and greater significance in our elections. we see this new division, this special division created in the postal service to deal with election mail. tucker, i just don't think that people should be trusting the postal service with their mail-in ballots. they ought to be voting in person with government-issued id to be totally safe. >> tucker: why is there any mail-in balloting? if you can't be bothered to get to the polls, why do you have a right to participate in

democracy? i don't understand. i mean, it's an invitation for fraud. they support it because it allows fraud. why are republicans putting up with it? >> well, they're putting up with it because voters like the convenience. they certainly like the convenience until former president trump warned them about the dangers of it. now you're beginning to see this division between republicans who are becoming more skeptical of mail-in ballots and democrats who love them, because, of course, you can send people to the house of voters, and help them fill out the ballot and make sure that they vote for the right people. so what happens with mail-in ballots, tucker, is you lose the secrecy of the ballot. that's a very important thing that people forget about. >> tucker: and no one trusts elections. so then the system does degrade. it's built on trust. this undermines trust. it's poisoned obviously. chuck devore, thank you. >> thank you. >> tucker: well, if you talked to any canadian before three or

four years ago, they'd brag about their free healthcare. of course it's not free. there's a catch to it. turns out once the government controls healthcare, they can impose their antihuman agenda, including encouraging doctors to euthanize people for reasons that probably don't justify euthanasia. that's happening. we'll tell you how next.

large out-of-state corporations have set their sights on california. they've written prop 27, to allow online sports betting. they tell us it will fund programs for the homeless. but read prop 27's fine print. 90% of profits go to out-of-state corporations, leaving almost nothing for the homeless.

no real jobs are created here. but the promise between our state and our sovereign tribes would be broken forever. these out-of-state corporations don't care about california. but we do. stand with us.

>> tucker: american media pretty much ignore anything that happens north of detroit, but we're interested in canada for two reasons. one, we share a multithousand-mile-long border with canada. and two, canada is a real country. so if canada moves in a dark direction, we should know about it, because it could be a harbinger of our future. with that in mind, you should know that the canadian government is effectively pressuring patients into killing themselves, probably to cut costs. for example, in june of 2019, a canadian man called allen nichols, went to the hospital, saying he was depressed. within a month, the hospital killed him on purpose. they called it euthanasia. why did they do that? there was only one medical

condition listed on his application for euthanasia, and that was hearing loss. it's not that uncommon in canada. last year, three un observers determine that canada's euthanasia laws are the most permissive in the world, and violate human rights. the author of "losing our dignity" joins us tonight to assess. this is our monthly warning to the country, professor, about what euthanasia really means. but killed for hearing loss. that seems a little far even for canada. >> a cam meg nose inside the tent euphemism, tucker? >> tucker: yeah. >> this is way beyond that. this is multiple camels rampaging through canada, right? >> tucker: yeah. >> utterly out of control, but predictable. for literally decades the right to die is going to be a duty to die, a coercive duty to die, the

most vulnerable who are the ones who will face this. time and time again, guess who are the ones pushing so-called medical aid in dying, those who claim to be on the side of vulnerable populations. >> tucker: exactly. >> it's time to put up or shut up. are you on the side of vulnerable populations? then you're on the side of euthanasia. >> tucker: you're not for killing them, exactly. who is in favor of this and why? >> well, i'm a member of the academy. i'm not proud to say most members of the academy are for this. a good chunk of the medical associations are in favor of this, though importantly not the american medical association yet. i urge members of the american medical association to push back against this. this is not healthcare. then finally media members who cover these stories, who do it in a way, again, that puts the veneer that they're on the side of these vulnerable populations.

guess who's against this. the poor, the working class, and disabled. are we listening to them? we're not listening to them. >> tucker: we never do, because they're not in the media. this can be sold as the next frontier in human liberation, getting some doctor to kill you. that's how they'll sell it, correct? >> that's right. and tucker, if you allow me to make a case for this, this puts the very notion of healthcare as a thing, as a coherent thing up for grabs. if we can kill you for hearing loss, calling it healthcare, then the definition of healthcare goes completely out of bounds. i'll see you and raise you abortion in the case of the disabled. they say that's healthcare, right? cutting off the healthy breasts of a healthy 15-year-old girl, calling that healthcare. tucker, we really are at the point where it's not even clear what we're talking about as as coherent idea of healthcare at all. >> tucker: that's exactly right. always watch the words.

when they become subverted, you know something dark is happening. thank you. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: if you checked joe biden's little red book lately, you know that illegal immigration is a blessing, but there's an exception to that principle. joe biden just made that expectation. we'll tell you what it is next.

hi, i'm denise. i lost over 22 pounds with golo. i've done the work. years and years of fighting and fighting and never getting the results. golo is the only thing that gave me this.

it gave me back me.

these days it seems like everything is vying for your attention. there are tons of trending dances to discover on social media, and there's even this- the easiest way to book an exam at america's best. get two pairs and a free exam for $79.95. book your exam today.

>> tucker: time for a daily hypocrisy watch. joe biden offer open borders. every city should be a sanctuary city. illegal aliens are more american then you are, and that's why all walls are racist. except the one that joe biden supports. and can you guess where that wall is? that wall is around joe biden's delaware beach house. and guess who is paying for it? you are. ordering dhs directing $500,000 wall on his property in delaware

beach. they can come to our country, but they can't come to joe biden's house. and if they do, his bodyguards weaponized with high magazines will take care of it. amazing. just a reminder you can stream the latest documentary on something bizarre happening in the livestock on fox nation. we will see you monday, have the best weekend. ♪ ♪ >> sean: welcome to "hannity" and buckle up around two, because the biden administration is now trying to resurrect the ministry of truth. now after two years of lying and misleading you will come of the american people about covid-19, also tonight the cdc announced a big shake-up citing "some pretty public mistakes." wow, you don't say. rand paul who highlighted this a long time ago, he will join us. and after accidentally shooting and killing a woman on a movie set, alec baldwin now says his life is at risk all