>> tucker: tony andrew tate is a thought criminal with an inalienable right to decide for yourself and you can fox nation right now with the whole interview. we'll be back, we always are, hpm, your sean hannity. wait, that's not sean hannity, that's pete hegseth! >> i snuck up on you, brother! little ambush, tucker, great show, thanks a lot! welcome to the special edition of "hannity" as tucker said, i'm pete hegseth in tonight for s sean. we begin with breaking news from south florida. today judge bruce reinhardt ordered the doj to unseal a redacted version of that affidavit used to justify the mar-a-lago raid. officials have until noon

tomorrow to make the affidavit public. with the latest, fox news contributor jonathan turley and ticket for being here thank you for being here. we could get the rejected affidavit at any moment and we were preparing on the show, will we be waiting until noon and what do you think we will see? >> weed could be waiting until noon and i must admit i'm skeptical that it's the same department not a single word of the redacted of the affidavit should be released. on the first attempt they were able to miraculously hit the goldilocks point of getting it just right because it appears that the judge did not push back on any sections. for those of us who have litigated against this department over and over reductions and classifications, there is a certain degree of skepticism that left to its own devices, they maximize what could be released.

i'm grateful that something will be released. i'm hoping truly that attorney general garland saw the earlier position was wrong and he went and said let's try to be as transparent as possible. after all, the affidavit doesn't likely contain a lot of good sections for donald trump. affidavits aren't like that. these are one-sided counts that make the case for searches and seizures. it's not like i'm only rejecting the stuff that's good for donald trump. but i am hoping they see this as a moment to break from tradition to have greater transparency, and we will see you tomorrow. >> pete: so come of the reflex from the doj would probably be to take a page full of words and make it nothing. but you are saying potentially there is the incentive from the doj because of the blowback to

read acting and sensitive information provided more information about why they did it. i'm prepared for a sheet of full black, jonathan. you are telling me maybe we will get actual information here. >> this is the exercise of hope over experience because i've been in heated litigation. this department is infamous for using reductions and classifications for tactical purposes. i've been in cases where they have over redacted to a ridiculous degree. of judges defer to them. but i recently noted in a piece that there have been former occasions where the attorney general could have taken modest steps to assure the public that this was not a politically motivated effort and failed to do so. this is the fifth, and he can reverse course. you can just demand the public trust in his department. you have to earn it.

there's a history here and legitimate questions about how this department is conducted past trump related investigations. >> pete: you're exactly right and you wonder if their self-reflection at this point. only once, shame on you, for me four times, shame on me. we will see if they decide to put their cards on the table and transparency would be very helpful at this moment with a lot of people wondering what this thing was all about. jonathan turley, we will keep you on speed dial until noon tomorrow. thank you for the breakdown before we gather. we have more on the doj's stunning overreach later in the show and if that affidavit comes out redacted, not redacted the mobile will bring it to you. let's turn to joe biden's war on the working class. today he traveled all the way to suburban maryland. yelling in three microphones about how much he hates republicans from supporters specifically. at a fund-raiser earlier today,

he referred to trump voters, his supporters, and supporters of semi fascism. that's a direct vote. a of s supporter of semi fascis. the president allowed don mcgahn that student new scheme to transfer student loan death doctors and lawyers, sociology majors with horrible arts degrees with two graduate degrees in gender studies and the debt is transferred to blue-collar americans. tonight, "the wall street journal" is calling the plan "an abuse of power that favors college grads at the expense of hardworking plumbers and fedex drivers," even the editorial board at "the washington post" is blasting it is regressive and inexpensive mistake. it was not one line in an otherwise puff piece for biden, the other editorial for "the washington post" tore into this data transfer scheme.

at least half a dozen democrats and congress are coming out against the proposal. this biden administration is refusing to say how much the scheme will cost and just who will pay the bill? watch this. >> can you explain a little bit about how you guys are thinking this is possible? you can't say how much is going to cost, you can't say exactly how it's going to be paid for. you can see exactly who is paying for the cost. >> i get your arguing how it helps certain populations, but how was it fiscally responsible? >> the way that we are talking about it and trying to say, the actions that we have taken and you see this with the way that the deficit has been reduced. we have taken the last 19 months, i see the look that your giving me there. >> previously fiscally irresponsible actions -- >> no, no, no. i mean, we see this, we do not

see this as irresponsible. we see this as a fiscally responsible balanced approach to doing this. >> pete: i see the look that your giving me as you don't give me an answer. joining me now steve scalise and founder of the committee to unleash prosperity. if steve moore whose newsletter is called of what the hotline." let me start with you steve. they haven't released who's going to pay for it, how many will access it, and how it's going to be paid for. what do we know about the cost of this and have her $300 billion but it seems like a floating number. to go well, i've got to tell you i wrote a piece for foxnews.com on this yesterday about how unfair it is. how it fiscally irresponsible it is. i have never seen people so angry about something. biden propose this because he thought it would be popular with some voters, but i think he's laid an egg here. the big problem with the bill is that they don't know how much it's going to cost. the estimate around $300 billion

and by the way, steve scalise knows just two weeks ago they passed a bill saying we are going to reduce the deficit and now they pass a bill that's going to add another $300 billion. added up, pete, you look in the 18 months joe biden has been in office, four trillian dollars of spending, debts, money printing and you wonder where the inflation has c come from. >> pete: they have the gall to tell us there reducing inflation in the deficit as if the numbers add up. representative, is this the new reality? executive with a stroke of the pen through the administrative state can effectively wield the power of the purse. i thought it was meant for the legislative branch. can republicans or the new majority due to rain this in? >> yeah, pete, it's the universe. many are questioning whether this is even legal to do.

joe biden himself was speculating it might be illegal. about a year ago when he was talking about doing this, he did it anyway. they know it will add to the deficit and the debt. i'm seeing numbers it's over $500 billion in deficit spending in addition to what they did last week. $730 billion tax increase, plus $87,000 agents going after middle-class people. by the way, increasing inflation and inflation is driven by the man trillions in spending that you've seen. look at what that's going to do. all to do what? shift income about 85% of americans and they'll be paying for about 15% of americans who do. is that a wealth transfer and for what? they didn't get a good education? they should ask for a rebate from the college, not from the hardworking taxpayers of ame

america. >> pete: steve moore, talk to me about the wealth transfer because there's a huge chunk of americans who will pay for a smaller chunk of americans for their debt that they accrue to. where's the money going from whom to whom? >> great point. we have half the workers in america who don't have a college degree. what this bill essentially will do is take $300 billion to people who have college degrees from people who don't have college degrees. how in the world is not fair? when i said people were angry about this, what really makes people angry is that -- this is not what america is about. if you play by the rules and you get more then. if you're not paying your debts, your deadbeat. i'm going to say that. if you're not doing -- signed the and said you're going to pay the money back, you're not going to. one other point i'm going to make which is important, i thickets the death of the student loan program if they do this. think about this, who in the

world ever is going to repay a student loan? the program steve scalise is dead if they do this because the incentives are never to pay your loan and wait until they give you an amnesty and you don't have to pay the money back. >> pete: representative, respond to that. you're in the business of policy and politics. democrats probably assumed it would be wildly popular with young voters. but the backlash has been massive. >> it's horrible policy and horrible politics. only joe biden could do a double whammy. you are seeing the left go after this just as the right is going after it. steve moore talked about some great points too. when you think about why there's a student loan program, it's to help people go to college, graduate, i went to lsu and paid every dime back. what about the millions of people who pay their loans back? what do you tell them? don't forget, they took over and them being the federal

government took over the student loan program under obama to pay for obamacare. you saw mushrooming in student loan debt because the federal government was encouraging more student loan debt because they had to pay for the massive growth of the new program called obamacare. means they're blowing a $500 billion debts. to take money from one group of people and give it to another. that's insanity and not legal and there is challenges to it. the fact that biden's willing to do it tells you a lot about how misguided they are on the inflation deficit and what's driving all of these massive problems. >> pete: go ahead real quick. >> why are we holding the universities responsible for some of the debt? they have $700 billion of endowment. $700 billion and why don't they use that money to lower tuition for families? if a school has somebody going through the school, they don't

pay that debt back, i think that the school should be responsible for that money, not the tax taxpayer. >> pete: i like that. actual accountability for the student. it makes a lot of sense. if steve's delivering on the thursday night, steve moore, congress and steve scalise, thank you so much. if you paid your loans, you're a soccer. the rest of you, well, will pay for yours. the loan regressive scheme is a regressive tax on the mill class but it might not even be legal. the administration get the rationale -- the ministrations trying to bypass congress by citing a post-9/11 law from 2003 called the heroes act. the law was passed to ease the burden of loans payment for troops deployed in defense of our country. joining now with more is the senior advisor in marine that dan caldwell.

a poison tree from the beginning, the rationale for the executive to cancel the debt was that it's a covid emergency just like troops deployed in 2003 from the heroes act? >> that's correct. you pointed out to come intent of the law was to help reserve national guardsmen who had to walk away from their civilian jobs to deploy in support of the wars in iraq and afghanistan. many of whom were taking pay cuts to do this, it's only fair that they received some student loan debt relief. and there's a reference in the law to national emergencies and the biden administration is claiming that well of a covert is a national emergency and therefore we have the power to do it. here's the thing, just about a month and half ago, justification to basically undo two immigration policies that trump put in place. the biden administration said there's not a kovic of an emergency so we don't need to have the title 42 in place and

remain in mexico policy. you should not be surprised by this at all and we have seen before be an emergency for one week and not next. but yet again another example of covid in weaponized by the government to expand their po power. >> pete: covid is an emergency when it pertains to student debt that has been cause for over years. it feels like a little bit of policy in the medicine. i love how you point out the expansion of the administration state, things like this that have been used by republicans and democrats, but this case leftists to expand the prerogatives of the federal government. explained that. >> we have seen a weaponization of laws, systems, institutions created after 9/11 as part of the global war on terror. think about the use of

surveillance during the russia collusion a hoax. if they proposed the creation of the department of homeland security this information board, basically run by a political activist. or the use of military force to justify military conflicts far field from afghanistan. the biden administration's use of the hero act as part of the dynamic. it's unfortunate that these laws passed for 9/11 have been used to greatly expand executive power and congress needs to rein them in and i hope they have the courage to do so. >> pete: be careful what you do in times of emergency, but because later on it'll be used for other means especially by people whose job it is to grow government. thank you for bringing this up and fighting for it. we appreciate you. by the way, many of us received g.i. bill loans. we got paid back for them, but no one ever got -- that's a whole other thing. think about that. yesterday during a truly bizarre

speech, biden claimed to student loan planet is so important because according to joe, african americans and hispanic americans don't own homes. watch. >> many of you had to leave school because of financial strain and it was much too high. about of the third with no debt and no degree. the burden is especially heavy on black and has hispanic. >> pete: okay, this is the same joe biden who said poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids. set it in 2019 implying only minority pit though my children are poor. don't forget them according to joe, you ain't black if you don't vote for him. here with reaction, the host of the larry elder show. larry elder. your response to yet another

admission you might say of joe biden of how he feels of minority voters? >> welcome a pizza, don't forget he said entrepreneurs were are black are just as good as anybody else with no access to lawyers and accountants. if biden was so concerned about the burden of student loans on black and brown and people of color, they target people who can pay back the loans because they are in financial distress. as been pointed out some of the bulk of the student loan forgiveness will be upper-class people, many whom went to expensive colleges and advanced degrees like masters and phds. charlie kirk pointed out in his current book, working a job that don't require advanced degrees and some don't require a college degree. i call it reparations for rich white people. that's what this is. you start with the proposition that nobody put a gun to anybody's head and said take out these loans. it's a very simple proposition. take out the loans and you

assume that they are going give you a career that would be moneymaking. these people who are having their loans forgiven are in the best position to pay them off than any other americans. most americans have not gone to college and those who have most of them have paid back their debts. aside from that, i've got no problem with it. >> pete: not to mention two and a half years where payment has been paused. if any financial responsibility exists, there's plenty in the coffers to address what loans are outstanding. it is a part of a political transformation as the republican party has become more diverse, more of a working-class party, the democrat party starting to reflect even more the college educated white liberal priorities? >> it certainly is. these are the people who will be largely the beneficiaries of this i said before. it's all about buying their votes.

whenever there's a government scheme, ask yourself three questions. who's going to pay, how much does it cost, will it achieve its desired objective. it's backfiring, two-thirds of americans believe that debt forgiveness should be targeted toward people who are in need. this does not do that. it will blow up in their faces and it's going to add to the debt and the deficit and cause inflation. all of which the inflation deduction act was supposed to not do. this is just a complete and total outrage. every type you think the free lunch crowd can think the lunch is even further, they believe the lunch can be even freer. >> pete: the obama in his creation did not see would bring about the tea party movement and i didn't see this being the trigger but it's a blatant lack of fairness. the administrative state in one leftists will do to your lives given the chance to buy other people's votes with your money. larry elder, thank you so much

for your time and breaking it down. we appreciate it. coming out, two-tiered system of justice once again on full display as the widespread bias in the doj continues to be exposed. gregg jarrett, alan dershowitz join us with the latest coming up next. ♪ ♪ demands a lotion this pure. gold bond pure moisture lotion 24-hour hydration no parabens, dyes, or fragrances gold bond champion your skin

♪ ♪ >> pete: welcome back to the special edition of "hannity." it tonight, it's good to be a biden in the washington swamp. of fbi whistle-blowers are telling senator ron johnson of wisconsin that high-ranking officials inside the bureau prohibited agents from investigating hunter biden and his laptop from heck. they could not investigate and were told until after the 2020

election. that's not all, according to mark zuckerberg, the fbi contacted facebook in 2020 and warned of russia propaganda. just as the hunter biden laptop story emerged. watch. >> there was a lot of attention on twitter during the election because of the hunter biden laptop story. you guys center that as well? >> we took a different path than twitter. basically the background is the fbi came to us and some folks on our team saying, hey, as you know, you should be on high alert that we thought there was a lot of russian propaganda. 2016 election, we have noticed that basically there is about to be some kind of dump that is similar to that. be vigilant. heads up, there's a bunch of stuff out there that we'd like you to think is russian

propaganda, but is actually a laptop that we refuse to investigate. it's almost like the fix was in. even now, despite a series of blatant crimes and a mountain of evidence, hunter biden is still not charged with a single crime. however, two florida residents will spend up to five years in prison for stealing a diary belonging to the president's adult daughter, ashley' biden. the same diary ashley describes showers with her dad joe that were probably not appropriate. five years. think about the blm riots, joining now the author of the price of principal harvard law professor alan dershowitz and gregg jarrett. the idea that the fbi would have evidence with the ability to verify yet that has significant and mountains of criminality and

they would hold off? what reason could it be? >> corruption. top management at the fbi is a cesspool of corruption and that's precisely why more and more fbi agents have come forward to expose it. you know, they see top senior management officials were running into pr a protection rar the biden's. they put their heavy feats on the scales of justice to bury incriminating evidence of influence peddling, money laundering, tax evasion, maybe even so far as racketeering. people have to ask themselves, how it though mike is at the fbi had the laptop since december of 2019 and the investigation presenting over biden, the justice department has going on longer and no action? it is because they found out

from the whistle-blowers that the fbi in addition to bearing evidence, they've been propagating false accusations that the laptop was russian this information when they knew it was not. christopher wray has done nothing to clean up the fbi. merrick garland, the attorney general who presides over the fbi has done nothing at all. he has refused consistently to appoint a special counsel notwithstanding glaring and disqualifying conflicts of interest. think about it, this is the guy who is presiding over the investigation of his bosses son with evidence that implicates his boss joe biden, the president of the united states. it's disgraceful. >> pete: it is beard of professor dershowitz, is it possible the fbi could get a laptop like this, and give facebook a heads up that this stuff is coming out.

did not pursue it itself? greg said corruption. is there a plausible explanation or is this really our top government investigative agency decided to put their finger on the scale again? >> it's much more of a fundamental question. whether you can depoliticize the fbi, depoliticize the justice department and remember this involves people appointed by republicans or democrats. with the change the system and create a kind of special counsel that involves investigations of political people. the people conducting investigations cannot be appointed by the president, cannot be partisan. they have to be people who are former judges. >> pete: real quick, that seems like a panel of experts which almost ever though mike never ends well. it feels like the constitution

should be the only standard. it feels like we're in a box. >> you can't achieve it when you have the attorney general having to make a decision that could help reelect the president. that's not possible. special councils are not perfect, but they're a lot better than the currently politicized fbi and justice department. we need to move back and adopt systems of the kind that occur in other countries in england and israel for example. they separate out the minister of justice which is a political job from the director of public prosecution which is a civil service job given only to the most distinguished people. you're right, of course, but the more you separate them out of politics, the better it will be not only must justice be done

write out a large percentage of the american public does not see justice being done. that's a real problem and it's not going to be improved tomorrow when the magistrate judge releases the affidavit because he's not going to release the strategy, the tactics of the case, the theory. why not? why does the government has something to hide in when it comes to the strategy? they have something to hide when it comes to that kind of thing, but we are entitled to know. are they going after the espionage act of 1917? we are entitled to know the theory of the case and the government has no reason for keeping it secret. >> pete: i'd be remiss if i didn't get your legal insight on that as well. the redacted affidavit and how much will we see? 30 seconds. >> remember, all ex parte proceeding which means one side

presented. what you will see it is merrick garland cherry picked which favors him in disadvantages donald trump. i'm skeptical we will see anything at all because i think the magistrate gave them until noon on friday which allows merrick garland to decide whether or not he will hop to a higher court to seek his stay while an appeal is pending. i'm not terribly optimistic we will get anything meaningful or truthful. >> i think the judges give the government when it wants. i think we will see tomorrow a very redacted affidavit release. >> pete: we shall see, professor dershowitz, gregg jarrett, thank you very much. straight ahead, our own sara carter exclusive investigation into the dangers of human trafficking. the biden border crisis continues, joining us are along

with buck sexton will be returned. ♪ ♪

hi, i'm angela. i've lost 58 pounds with golo and i've kept it off. i suffer from autoimmune hypothyroid and i always thought it would be so difficult to lose weight, but with golo, it simply wasn't.

♪ ♪ >> pete: welcome back to the special edition of "hannity." you sow part one of sara carter's interview. but the human smuggler, the trafficker in central america. here's part two of this "hannity" exclusive investigation. >> we are seeing a large increase of unaccompanied minors, children that have no guardians. is it part of -- i guess, they trafficking organization's because it's easier to lose children or it's more money? >> yeah, it's all part of that. >> what about people that want to buy a child because there a sexual predator?

>> i've heard that some people and places have very specific things in terms of nationalities or certain age groups. so, they are looking for people going around and spot someone with those characteristics, they tend to take them. in many cases, they just have children they are. they have a purpose. only they know what purpose they will serve. but, yeah, they're just going to keep them there and they're not going to be free ever again. when they keep the children, they could use them for anything, drugs, or for sex -- the kids could be abused on the road? in most cases, they want to sell their organs. >> that's very hard to hear. it's very hard. >> sometimes they take out the organs and filled the bodies with drug so they can take it to

the border. >> did they sell them to hospitals or to buyers like private buyers, wealthy buyers? >> there is people with money who want to buy the organs of kids and it's not only for the country, they take it to different countries and normally they do this with clinics. >> this is worth a lot of money. obviously, it's more lucrative for them to get the child and gain money from each organ they sell. they are obviously looking for opportunities to get more money out of it. they just care about the money. >> pete: wow. if sarah joins us now with cohost of the clay travis and buck sexton show. i was prepared to hear drugs, i was prepared tragically to hear sex trafficking because we know it happens, but organs? this is an international business of selling children. >> it's gut wrenching.

the horror, i cannot begin to explain. i wasn't expecting to hear it either, although i heard stories about this often. you know i know the mexican government was investigating a cartel in 2014 for harvesting organs from young children. the reason i did this and the reason i wanted everyone to hear this is because i want the american people to understand what kind of monsters these people are and what they are willing to do to children and what the biden administration is doing by perpetuating this border chaos. when we think of the border, we are thinking of people coming into the country of course with illegal migrants, immigrants, but we are expecting over 169,000 plus unaccompanied minors this fiscal year in the united states. i wanted people to understand how gruesome and how horrific this journey is for these children and if any of us have any compassion at all, we will listen to that and we will find

a way to put a stop to it. the first thing is by putting a stop and closing up the border. >> pete: it's gut wrenching, but when you send the wide open signal to criminals and the depravity is shocking, yet the administration has spun this is a humanitarian way. allowing people to enter our country. >> sarah's reporting shows everybody and anybody has been paying attention to the border sees this and been the case for the entirety of the biden administration. their approach at the border is unethical, it's a moral, and it's deeply cynical as a matter of politics. they could try to change the incentive structures for illegal crossings, they could try to limit the lawlessness as best they can and give additional order patrol resources. i spoke to border patrol regularly and i've seen it numerous times when you have the border patrol agents who are doing essentially humanitarian

instead of any other mission, they are taken off the line. what you have is the highest level of drug overdoses in u.s. history with fentanyl flooding across the border. cartel making billions of billions of dollars. treating the southern border like a wide-open highway. it's all appalling and the biden administration has gotten rid of him as a couple of weeks ago the remaining mexico policy. the tr on my computer, fundamentally, they do know what the situation to change when it comes to illegal crossings and as a result of that, it continues. it should be on national security emergency of the united states faces. it not ukraine and i know it shocking to a lot of people who sending billions of dollars over there is more important than dealing with our own national security issues here, but this needs a attention right away and the biden administration doesn't want to change its ways. >> pete: millions of illegals

that we know of -- go ahead, sara, please. >> i agree with buck on this. the administration is literally relegating the national security where the borders wide open if we've had over 800,000 since biden came into office, people we don't even know who they are. we are hearing straight from human smugglers, the people moving people up through the line, once they hit the cartels in mexico, these cartels are amassing hundreds of billions of dollars off children, the death of our own children, narcotics, organ harvesting, off child predators. there can be nothing more depraved or worse than what we are seeing. we are literally in a war, a war in our own hemisphere. no one's paying attention to this. >> pete: wears with cartels, do they fear anybody? >> certainly not.

i think the cartels and stronger position right now than they have been in many years. certainly financially, but also you have to assume politically because the way that the mexican regime is refusing to climb down on the activity. think about this, they are poisoning americans to the tune of over 100,000 per year all across the country. when people talk about how illegal immigration makes every state a border state and the cartels are in every state and city and their poisoning the neighbors, children, the biden administration's doing what about it? that's what we should ask. as long as the dash by the way, the avalanche, this will not stop. >> pete: it will not. 800,000, 50,000 a month the ones able to avoid detection likely assisted by the cartels which means their presence likely even more nefarious. as difficult as it was to watch tonight, you're doing the hard work.

sara carter and buck sexton tonight. coming up, the left's radical school takeover continues. parents are trying to fight b back. reacting to it next. ♪ ♪

new astepro allergy. now available without a prescription. astepro is the first and only 24-hour steroid free spray. while other allergy sprays take hours astepro starts working in 30 minutes. so you can... astepro and go.

for decades, i've worked at the intersection of domestic violence and homelessness. so when prop 27 promised solutions to homelessness, i took a good, hard look. it's not a solution. 90% of the money goes to the out-of-state corporations who wrote it. very little is left for the homeless. don't let corporations exploit homelessness to pad their profits. vote no on 27. when a truck hit my car, the insurance company wasn't fair. i didn't know what my case was worth. so i called the barnes firm. i was hit by a car and needed help. i called the barnes firm, that was the best call i could've made. i'm rich barnes. it's hard for people to know how much their accident case is worth. let our injury attorneys help you get the best result possible.

♪ the barnes firm injury attorneys ♪ ♪ call one eight hundred, eight million ♪ ♪ ♪ >> pete: welcome back to the special edition of "hannity." at the far left takeover at the education system as you know continues as the school year starts. the "washington examiner" has a shocking report on fairfax county, virginia. they teachers at all grade levels including preschool, the teachers are required to participate in a training program called supporting gender expansion and transgender youth.

the main takeaways of the training is that teachers do not need a parent's permission to change the name or pronouns of a student. even on their diplomas and transcripts. in other words, the school can change your kid's name or gender without telling you. that's what they teachers are being told in fairfax, virginia. if you think it sounds crazy, it already happened. lord of all places, the schools trying to visit facilitate atransition for a 12d student until she tried to mid suicide. here's what her dad toiled so micah told sean last night. >> apparently we were unfit of taking care of our daughter on this issue. when i question them about the lack of parental notification in this case, they said that there were confidentially issues from telling us about it. >> who do they think they are?

>> certainly, they think they are the parents. >> pete: here with reaction, the outnumbered cohost emily compagno, and my cohost rachel campos duffy. thank you for being here. you heard it, who did they think we are? there the parents now. a lot of people are thinking i thought they won on the issues and things would change but they continue. >> first of all, i'm reeling from your last segment the war on children at the border. but parents need to wake up. they say were on children in your schools as well. yes, they want to be the parents and this is what they're trying to do. they want to separate your child from you, from your values, your family bonds. that's the first step for indoctrination. ask anybody who comes from the

country that had totalitarianism or communism. they have to separate the challenge because the threat to the government and state is the family. they're doing it in high schools, elementary schools, the first step the parents can do if they're stuck in the schools, stop using the language. gender affirming, gender transitioning. these are changes whether they are using it by changing your child's name, her pronoun, or by changing his or her through surgeries. this is what they're doing, it's criminal and my heart goes out to the father. you can see him seething with anger and pain. >> pete: you say off and on show, it's child abuse when you're encouraging young kids who don't know otherwise from authority figures to avoid the

guidance of the parents and live in a leftist cocoon. are there legal recourse is and what in your mind can be done here? >> he filed an impressive 55 55 page civil complaint in the opening line is brilliant and true where he says the parents are filing this lawsuit to vindicate their fundamental rights as articulated under the united states and for the constitution and florida law. they go on to articulate the myriad of ways the school has encroached and diluted their constitutional rights. among them for example, that confidentiality right that he said that they were using to justify keeping their parents out of the picture is blown onto the water by that child's right to privacy. it was totally violated when the teachers they are told the other students that that person should be addressed by the opposite gender as they say in the lawsuit, he was totally distressed, did not ask for it whatsoever, and point out the

fact that under florida law, you have to -- there is a duty from schools to notify the parents when there are mental health issues. you would think one if not both, suicide attempts or month long conversations would qualify. i think the irony to me is that in 50 different ways that this absolutely tramples on the parents constitutional rights and for the statute laws the teachers can justify with one comment and can attribute to the religious faith that these parents have and somehow think it's way to hold up in court. that child hopefully is not damaged permanently because that's the biggest travesty. >> pete: we send the most impressionable into the hands of others. emily company oh, rachel campos duffy. thank you both. more "hannity" after the break. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪

>> pete: welcome back to "hannity," unfortunately that's all the time we have left for the evening and thank you for tuning in. i want to thank you for keeping my book on the number one "new york times" best seller list for ten weeks number one trend for four. remember, catch me saturdays and sunday mornings on fox & friends weekends and thank you sean for letting me sit in the big anchor chair. "the ingraham angle" is up next. laura, good evening. >> laura: congrats on the book and we will pick it up where you left off. i'm laura ingraham and this is the ingraham angle from a busy washington tonight. we will start right off with the laws of the left, that's the focus of tonight's "angle." here's an angle rule of thumb. whenever a democrat and election-year claims to be a sensible moderate or claims that he's going to challenge his party's orthodoxy, lying. the headline today made me