care from iowa. i think she should read "the art of the deal." i think she'd love it. that's it for us tonight. please dvr the show. i don't know how to do it. "tucker carlson" is up next. always remember, i'm watters, and this is my world. >> hurricane ian made landfall again today in south carolina today. we're continuing to follow that storm and its aftermath. live reports throughout the hour. good evening. welcome to a special edition of "tucker carlson tonight. i'm will tu cain in for tucker. the reconnaissance division, on

august 21st, an intelligence firm noticed the unusual presence of russian strategic bombers on site, spring break supersonic bombers designed to carry nuclear weapons. you're seeing the satellite imageries on your screen right now. then just days ago, on septembei intelligence spotted three more russian strategic bombers, t tu-95s. prior to august, there were no strategic bombers. now, as of this week, there are at least seven. ukraine is well within the range of both bombers. in related news, the deputy of the head of intelligence, determines there's a high risk of imminent risk of tactical

strikes on ukraine. how could you going to lower the temperature, prevent global nuclear war? that's the only question that matters. our leaders, though, have no answer instead of calming tensions, they seem to be deliberately provoking russia. today joe biden once again accused vladimir putin of blowing up his own pipeline. >> asked me earlier about the pipeline. let me say this. it was a deliberate act of sabotage, and now the russians are pumping out disinformation and lies. at the appropriate moment, when things calm down, we'll send divers down to find out exactly what happened. we don't know that yet, exactly, but we're not -- just don't listen to what putin is saying. we know what putin is saying is

not true. will: in february biden says, if russia invades there will no longer be a nord stream ii. the state department said the same thing, if russia invades ukraine one way or another, nord stream ii will not move forward. who has the incentive for it to come to an end? they make the threat, because nord stream ii helps putin. no reason to destroy his own pipeline. we know who is capable of shutting down his own pipeline. that would be joe biden and the keystone xl pipeline. look, there are those, in all fairness, who say the following. they say this is russia's way, bombing their own pipeline, of constricting supply to jack up

global oil and gas prices and in turn make money on existing contracts with india and china. but here's a question -- why blow up your own infrastructure? why not, you know, just turn off the tap? in fact, that's exactly what vladimir putin did just a few weeks ago. he shut down the nord stream ii pipeline. there was no gas flowing through of the pipeline he's accused of destroying to restrict the flow of gas, none of which was flowing through. i don't know who's responsible for this. i'm logically following incentive. if the u.s. and its allies sabotaged russian pipelines it wouldn't be the first time. in 1982, ronald reagan, authorized the cia to blow up a siberian national gas pipeline using software. so we, american citizens, before we march to a drumbeat directly

into global nuclear war are entitled to answers. you know who else is entitled to answers? climate activists. you'd think they'd take notice, you'd think they'd ask questions. why? because the nord stream ii leak caused more than 300,000 metric tons of methane to enter the atmosphere. sounds like a lot, right? here's how much according to bloomberg. that's roughly, quote, the same climate impact over a 20-year period as the annual emissions from about 5.48 million u.s. cars. but our leaders, even our green energy czar, they're hoping we ignore all of this. if that's the plan, it just might work, because there's so much going on it's hard to keep track. in what amounted to a crazy day, that literally flew under the radar, flew under the weather radar, and the news cycle, russia attempted to annex parts of ukraine, and then in turn the u.s. announced new sanctions on russia. >> we're announcing new

sanctions today as well, including new authorities to sanction anyone who provides political economic support to russia's fraudulent territorial claims. i've been in close touch with our nato allies, who are united in our resolve to take on his aggression. >> once more, let's dare to ask a few critical questions, let's dare to critically think. why would more sanctions deter russia? the last seven months of sanctions have led to blackouts and food shortages in europe. meanwhile in russia, the rube rublegot stronger. by the way, our economy tanked. history has thrown from japan to russia, sanctions don't deter, they provoke. maybe that's the goal. it's the only way to achieve regime change in russia, which is the stated goal of the biden administration. remember, putin, quote, cannot remain in power. joe biden's words last march.

he means it. in april, russia and ukraine had a tentative agreement to end this war. ukraine could have kept its territory. all they had to do was promise not to become a nato member, because nato wants to remove putin from power, but the biden administration and the uk vetoed that deal. so, again, a critical question. is this really about keeping ukraine safe or is it about regime change in russia? even if that means starting a world war. today if there was any doubt left the president of ukraine settled that question. he signed ukraine's, quote, expedited application to formally join nato, yet another slick, well-produced video from kyiv. watch.

>> will: nice pan on the handheld camera. if ukraine joins nato, that means world war under article five of the nato charter. millions die. instead of trying to avoid that catastrophe, our media, though, is telling us that is essentially inevitable. "the new yorker" published this excerpt, that we're already fighting in the third world war, whether we acknowledge it or not, perhaps save for the whole holocaust. over to nbc, a historian compared putin's russia to nazi germany before the start of the second world war. why? because putin announced he's annexing territories into russia. ukrainian territories into russia. is that comparison fair? putin to hitler? nato thinks so. the foreign minister of poland just pledged that nato countries will use nuclear weapons against russia if russia's strategic bombers carry out a first

strike. he said it doesn't even matter if ukraine is in nato or not. in washington, you will not find a politician, in either party, who disagrees on that point. they all believe that defending ukraine is worth risking armageddon. of course. so does lindsey graham. he just also compared putin to hitler. >> i hope we'll also send a very clear signal here that we're going to have more aid in the -- if we do an omnibus in december, which i hope we will, to fund the government, we'll have a robust package of military support taking ukraine into 2023. have we learned nothing from the last century? what should we have learned? that when it comes to bullies and crazy people who want to, you know, put the world under their thumb, like hitler, they should believe what they say, stand up to them sooner rather than later. >> will: that was lindsey graham. standing next to him, democratic

senator richard blumenthal. why are both parties trying to provoke russia into using the bombers? we'll ask colonel doug mcgregor, a retired u.s. army colonel who joins us now. colonel, great to see you this evening. a whirlwind whiplash of news today when it comes to russia and ukraine. what should we make of it? >> well, not quite what senator graham had to say, or for that matter president biden. the destruction of the pipeline was clearly not executed by russia. no one believes that. in fact the german population is being polled. overwhelming is opposed to the notion of any war with russia and dismisses out of hand the notion that the russians are responsible for the pipeline. i think three things are what we're dealing with right now. first of all, putin has decided that no one in washington will negotiate with him. he knows that washington is ultimately in control. and so he's decided that if

response he's got to escalate the military operation. people aren't aware of it in the west, but the russian forces in ukraine have always been outnumbered from the day they entered ukraine. that's going to change rather than dramatically. i suspect the bombers that you referred to, who carry both conventional or nuclear weapons, will have conventional arms, and those bombers are probably going to be used in the escalation we're about to witness in ukraine. i think he's going to settle this dispute in ukraine on terms that are acceptable to russia that we may not like. other than poland, no one in nato is interested in going to war with russia. if we persist on this line, we will see nato dissolve and fragment. >> will: because you're saying they will not follow poland's lead, not stand to together. i assume that's what you're saying, colonel? >> of course, absolutely. no one wants to go to war with russia, other than the poles and

a few people in washington, d.c. >> will: that will be the key. that will be the key, whether or not if the world does not follow poland into the war with russia, will the united states of america push the world into war with russia. colonel doug macgregor, thank you so much. >> sure. >> will: a fox news alert. hurricane ian made landfall in the carolinas today. we're in charleston, south carolina. molly, what are you seeing with the latest? >> good evening, will. the rain and the wind has tapered off. things have slowed down quite a lot here as ian as moved further inland. in downtown charleston have, we had a chance to drive around. there was 6 inches up to a foot of water on the streets down there, not uncommon when there's a big storm. this city is used to that flooding. around 6:00, 7:00, it had begun to recede quite dramatically. a lot of people on the streets checking for damage, picking up palm fronds and branches that

had come down. still right now tens of thousands of people without power. so they're keeping their eye on big, gusty winds that still remain. more than one person expressed a general sentiment that charlton dodged a bullet with this storm. further to the north, from here to myrtle beach, the coastline got pounded. one of the hardest-hit spots is pauly's island, inundated with ocean water there in that area. there were high water rescues, the midway fire department pulling out high water rescue vehicles. will? >> will: momomolly lyon, thank u so much. brian, where is the storm now and where is it going? >> will, the storm is located in north carolina now. take a look at it there. and i'm going to do a little meteorology with you here. you can see this line right here. the storm is called

post-tropical where top winds at 60 miles an hour, mostly over the ocean. it's called post-tropical because it's more like an inland nor'easter right now, morphed itself. that line i was showing you, that's the line -- didn't draw that well, did i? that line is between the cold air to the north and the tropical air to the south. when cold air and tropical air meet we end up with a lot of rain. we still have the winds. look at the rain. again, it's north of that line. that's where that tropical moisture is running up over that colder air. this is going to be very heavy rain in some spots. they have flood alerts out. i mean, kind of a big deal across that part of the country. here is the wind situation. so by tomorrow morning, 40-mile-an-hour winds here, moving out of north carolina. then the storm dies out by saturday night in terms of the wind. ignore all the colors here. u.s. why think of all the areas under a wind alert.

it's because of the tropical and nontropical characteristics of the storm. then we talk about the rain. here's the rain. you can see why the purple areas are, 5-8 inches over hilly country. that's a lot of rain, causing flooding. here's the deal. in the yellow area there, that's what the national weather service is saying has a very likely potential for flash flooding. that's tonight into tomorrow. so from charlotte to columbia, over to norfolk, and raleigh, be on the lookout for that possibility. it's a dangerous night to be out. everybody should really stay in. then take a look at the rest of the weekend. here's the big band that we were talking about coming in with strong cells, heavy, heavy rain tonight. we go through tonight into tomorrow, and this slowly peters out, but spreads north and ruins the weekend up and down the i-95 corridor. then finally just dies out this weekend. all right, guys, that's it. back to you. >> will: brian, great information for anyone living in

the carolinas and the eastern seaboard for the rest of the weekend. brian norcross, thank you so much. tucker will make an appearance this hour. that's straight ahead. plus, should joe biden take a cognitive test? we'll go over that next.

>> will: 2022 sadly on track to be the most violent year in the history of the city of philadelphia. the city of brotherly love about to set an all-time homicide record, 562 killings according to axeios this year. the city is already on pace, that's the record, to exceed that number by the end of 2022. it's not just murders. everything is going up. robberies with guns up 60%. just this week, philadelphia set a new all-time record for carjackings. they had a thousand in total. here's footage of one of those those carjackings. >> take whatever you want, sir!

>> will: these videos are becoming all too common. the crimes are also obviously all too common, but five years ago a da was elected in philadelphia with some help by the way. nearly 2 million of krasner's financing came from george soros. he announced they would stop prosecuting crimes like prostitution and drug possession, emboldening criminals. now he's downplaying the philadelphia's problem. >> you are a reform district attorney. everybody in the country knows that. maybe it's not working. >> it is working. the reality is that our -- >> a thousand people killed in 20 months. >> it is working. the reality is when you look at all these different jurisdictions, we've had a devastating blow from the pandemic. there is absolutely no correlation between being

progressive or traditional and the rate of crime. the rate of homicide in trump states as compared to biden states, take all 50 of them, is 40% higher. >> the republicans say the opposite. >> republicans lie. let's just get down to it. republicans lie. that is what they do. >> will: so much to work through there. a pennsylvania congressman joins us. let's start with the statement "it is working." the policy is working, according to -- -->> totall delusional. if you graduated with 300 kids in your high school class, three

victims would be the victim of violent crime, if you were in philadelphia. that's staggering. the person to blame is krasner. the fact that he fired 30 veteran prosecutors when he took office, in essence, did away with cash bail, for example, leading to the chaos and the violence we're seeing on the street. >> will: it's not as though we're at the cutting edge, the leading edge, of watching and experimenting, how these policies play out. we're seeing it across the nation. so in other words, when he says it's working, it makes me wonder, well, maybe it is in your estimation, maybe it is working, if you actually want to create more crime. that's exactly what's happening when he says, well, trump states, red states, have higher crime, ignoring the fact that's localized in blue cities within red states. >> you can correlate the rise in crime to two things. number one, das that in fact

decriminalizing a lot of offenses. also the defund the police movement. we've seen in places like l.a., for example, no, where they cut $1 billion, crime rates go up as you defund the police. they can't hide from these statistics. >> will: no, no doubt. unfortunately philadelphians can't hide from this crime. it's being played out, not just in philadelphia, but cities across this nation. you have to ask, then, what is the goal that you're actually working toward then? what is the goal? all right, congressman, thank you for joining us this evening. >> thank you, will. >> will: major cities becoming more dangerous, this while the economy is in a free-fall, nuclear war, a possibility. at a time like this, you need, not just want, you need a competent president. so you have to ask, what's joe biden been doing lately? we assembled a montage of recent joe biden footage. all these clips are from the month of september. >> some people ask whether you

are fit for the job. and when you hear that i wonder what you think. >> watch me. [applause] >> mr. president -- >> to live, not having the money to pay for it. not a joke. think about it. think about what you'd think about. >> you're going to use that as a basis to build on, because you need security, you need stability for what you have. i mean, this is incredible. ♪ ♪ >> this is it united states of america, for god sake. >> i want to thank all of you here, including bipartisan

elected officials, like senator braun, senator booker, representative jackie -- you here? where's jackie? i thought she was going to be here. >> will: you're tempted to laugh. it's comical, but it's sad for the united states of america. americans can't be expected to ignore the signs of joe biden's decline. it's right there. it's in front of our face. now one physician says joe biden should submit to a cognitive evaluation immediately. that physician is dr. nicole sapphire, and joins us now. great to see you this evening. why don't we have a cognitive test on joe biden? >> well, that's a great question. now, first of all, you know, i have to say, i'm not saying the president has dementia. i can't. i haven't been in the same room with him, let alone perform the necessary tests to evaluate his cognition. i'm adamantly saying anyone

seeking an elected position should be fully transparent with their physical and cognitive fitness to make sure they can do the duties of the job they seek or that they hold. now, the president in november of 2021, had his annual physical exam. we get it every single year from the presidents, and they say how strong they are. the president's physician talked about some of his, you know, common medical comichaelmi morb. under the affordable care act, those 65 and older are required to have a cognitive assessment when they have their annual wellness exam. yet the president's wellness exam did not mention his cognition. if you remember in 2018, president trump, because people were questioning what his mental state was, he underwent a common generalized assessment, the montreal one, and he passed it with flying colors. so now the president has his annual physical coming up in about a month. he'll be 80 years old. president or not, any

80-year-old man should be subject to cognitive testing. >> will: yeah. i think that's probably the most important point. you know, i don't think it escapes anyone's attention, but in that clip, asking where jackie is, congresswoman walorski, wondering where is jackie. if you were not president of the united states, you'd want a cognitive test. we're talking about the leader of the free world. >> well, will, and that's unfortunately -- that's why i wrote the article. that's why it's coming to my attention, because of these gaffes. we have to know if the presiden, deserve to know, as americans, you know, elections they're essentially investments of our future of america. the we need to have -- put our strongest foot forward, dealing with inflation, coming out of covid, everything else we're dealing with.

the if gaffes may be gaffes, but president or not he should undergo cognitive testing at his annual wellness exam, an nothing else. >> will: and i appreciate, you shouldn't diagnose any from a distance, but you can't deny with what everyone can see with their eyes. everyone has had an elderly parent or grandparent. everyone sees signs. and unfortunately we're seeing them in spades with the president of the united states. doctor, thanks. turns out tony fauci became wealthy during the pandemic. how did that turn out? plus, tucker will join us with more of his interview with ufc president dana white. that's

announcer: type 2 diabetes? discover the power of 3 in the ozempic® tri-zone. in my ozempic® tri-zone, i lowered my a1c, cv risk, and lost some weight. announcer: ozempic® provides powerful a1c reduction. in studies, the majority of people reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as stroke, heart attack, or death in adults also with known heart disease. and you may lose weight. adults lost up to 14 pounds. ozempic® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't share needles or pens, or reuse needles. don't take ozempic® if you or your family ever had

medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. gallbladder problems may occur. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. join the millions already taking ozempic®. ask your health care provider about the ozempic® tri-zone. announcer: you may pay as little as $25 for a 3-month prescription. >> will: welcome back to a special edition of "tucker

carlson tonight." when dana white first got involved in the ufc back in 2001, he he never imagined thate sport would allow female athletes, until ronda rousey became one of the most famous female athletes in the world. >> tucker: so when you got into this 22 years ago, did you imagine there could be a category for female fighters? >> no. what you have to understand is at that time i was trying to get people to accept men fighting in a cage, which people thought was horrible. i saw a fight up in northern california with two women. that was a horrible mismatch. and i was, like, oh, my god. nobody's ready for this. then i met ronda rousey. >> tucker: and it was ugly? >> it was ugly. you see a woman on her back taking elbows to the face she can't defend, that she shouldn't have even been in this fight.

it's rough to see, you know. you know, again, i grew up in -- it comes off chauvinistic sometimes, because we live in a day and aging where women want to be equal. believe me when i tell you, women have proven here that they are equal. one of the greatest fights that you will ever see in your life -- i don't mean female fights. one of the greatest fights you'll ever see is that fight. they have absolutely proven themselves. and people love the women's fights. they're so tactical and so good. it's just i didn't see it coming. i didn't see it happening that fast, women getting -- even women boxing back in the day, it was like a novelty. they had no defense, so they'd stand in front of each other and just flail away. people would go crazy. nobody was, like, wow, that woman is super talented. she's -- you know, her style of fighting or this or that. here, these women are

unbelievable. they're technical and very good. >> tucker: and you know from the numbers that the audience responds? >> no. the audience doesn't respond. the audience loves it. when i put a real good woman's fight on the card, a lot of people show up. why are you here? i want to see amanda nunes versus julianna pena, ronda rousey. these women have become big stars. >> tucker: yeah. famous. >> yeah. it's awesome. what's different from us, these women are as equal as the men. they fight the same amount of rounds in nontitle fights. they fight the same amount of rounds in championship fights. they get paid the same as the men do. they don't fight from a shorter tee. it's absolutely equally for

women and men. >> tucker: meritocracy at work. >> will: it's not a ring that i or tucker want to be in. most americans suffered during the covid pandemic. there's one person that did not. tony fauci. according to the nonprofit open the books, the net worth of tony fauci and his wife increased by more than $5 million during the pandemic. a lot of that money came from a foreign nonprofit. this raises a lot of questions about potentially conflicts of interest. in june, tony fauci declined to answer questions, under oath, about those potential conflicts. >> can you tell me that you have not received a royalty from any entity that you ever oversaw the distribution of money in research grants? >> well, first of all, let's talk about -- >> no. that's the question. have you ever received a royalty payment from a company that you later oversaw money going to that company? >> you know, i don't know as a

fact, but i doubt it. >> will: big thing to speculate about. you might want to know more. the author the new book, so you've been sent to diversity training, smiling through the apocalypse. he joins us now. most people didn't fare too well through the pandemic. isn't it odd that the man in charge of the pandemic prospered? yeah, right. step aside nancy pelosi we have a new king of wall street, and it's anthony fauci. in may 2021, right in the middle of the pandemic, this puppy-killing psychopath was going to release a book profiting on the pandemic at that time. even the most staunch branch

davidians weren't thinking he should be profiting off the pandemic in this way. didn't bother him too much. apparently he had side gigs going on, profiting him $5 million. it's absolutely insane. it would be nice to get answers. people like rand paul have good questions, but we'll never know to what extent anthony fauci gamed the system, and destroyed lives in the process. it's sad. he still won't answer the question, what kind. royalties people are getting for this vaccine they're pushing. >> will: game the system. that's the point of the conversation. you know, it's always worth noting, worth remembering, he's the highest paid government employee, more than the president of the united states, in terms of annual salary. what did he know? what did he know ahead of time? what did he know in order to

profit in whatever way he might have that he clearly did, as you point out to the tune of $5 million? why? it's more than worthy of an investigation. it's worthy of skeptical eyebrow-raising questions. >> exactly. why is it legal for a man in that position to take money from foreign nonprofits? why is that legal? has anyone asked that question? it seems absolutely insane. these are the people that the left parade around like heroes. i mean, he was dancing on the covers of magazines, like a little starlet in the muddle of the pandemic, and still refused to acknowledge this. if the left had their own mount rushmore they'd put him up there next to lizzo's big behind. they love this man. they refuse to pretend there's anything nefarious is going on, where it stinks, and it's sad. it's heartbreaking. >> will: he's on the list of things thou shall not question. you shall not question fauci or

you're a science denier. chad, great to talk to you. thank you. >> thank you. my pleasure. >> will: good news for conservatives living in left wing cities in the form of a dating app. tucker just spoke to the person who designed it. that's straight ahead. plus, much more on the aftermath of hurricane ian coming up.

prop 27 sends 90% of profits from online sports betting to out-of-state corporations in places like new york and boston.

no wonder it's so popular... out there. yeah! i can't believe those idiots are going to fall for this. 90%! hey mark, did you know california is sending us all their money? suckers. -those idiots! [ laughter ] imagine that, a whole state made up of suckers. vote no on 27. it's a terrible deal for california. we win. you lose. >> will: hurricane ian made landfall in south carolina today. storm chaser chris hall has captured major footage of the storm on your screen right now. he followed hurricane ian from florida to charleston. he hasn't slept in a long time. he's been livestreaming for 30 hours. he's the owner of 606 storm chasing and joins us now. chris, you've seen it over several states now. so what's the latest now on the conditions you're experiencing? >> well --

>> some places that have significant flooding. then a lot of places that have catastrophic damage. it's really speechless. i can't describe what i've seen. it's something that i wish that you didn't have to go through. at the same time a lot of people have heeded the warnings, everybody is trying to come home, and they're overloading the cell systems here. nobody can reach out, get ahold of their loved ones, causing a pretty big panic too. >> will: so we can provide a public service here in that

respect, then, is what you're telling us, although people are having trouble getting in touch with one and another, most people weathered through the storm, at least intact, if not well? >> where i -- [unintelligible] >> will: we're having trouble with your audio, chris. we appreciate the footage, the latest, what you're offering to the community, bringing us up to date with the latest on that storm. thank you very much. john mcactee quit his job to join the trump campaign, becoming one his advisors. living in washington, d.c. d, he noticed there wasn't a big pool for dating conservatives. today he officially launched an app called the right stuff to fix that. he talked to tucker about the app, why he made it.

here's part of the interview for "tucker carlson today." >> tucker: since you have a dating app, i'd be interested to know what that's like. you work at the white house. you go to bars, you tell people i'm the president's body man in washington, d.c.? >> yeah, that's what happens. i wouldn't do that, you know. i was mostly focused on work. but yeah, some of my friends would try to use the apps. the minute it became known they were working for trump, the date ended. that happened several times to my friends. >> tucker: really? >> yeah. girls would just get up and leave, abruptly try to end the date. >> tucker: because they were so aroused they couldn't trust themselves. >> yeah. >> tucker: or filled with revulsion they couldn't stay? >> it's tough to be a young conservative. in these cities, you have to

kind of hide your beliefs on these platforms. we want to give everyone a place where they can be themselves openly, and everyone is like them, at least in this major way. >> tucker: tell us how your app is different from what we've seen. >> it gets back to the basics, strips away all that stuff, but the biggest differentiator is the network itself. we've started with a good group of young consenter, and we're doing it on an invite structure. anyone can make a profile. we'll review it, try to get you in, if we know who you are, your intentions are good. but for the most part we're counting on our network to invite other people looking for the same thing. that doesn't mean necessarily everyone is looking for marriage, but it does mean they're going to use the app in a serious way and they're going to use it -- maybe it's college kids, maybe it's young professionals, maybe it is marriage, but you're going to find what you're looking for, but you're with your own people, with people that kind of see the world the same way, an just want to go out and have fun and live and be able to laugh, be allowed

to tell a joke, and not get someone that's offended by everything. >> will: i don't know about you, but i find it totally surprising that a bunch of young professionals, self-described virtuous members of society walk away, oh, no, you work for someone i disagree with. watch more of the conversation right there with tucker carlson on "tucker carlson today." it's up. check it out. nancy pelosi says illegal immigrants are, quote, god's children. today she let us know what she really thinks. it's a revealing video you do not want to miss. we have it for you straight ahead.

it's not just a donation. it's a warm blanket. it's a bottle of clean water. it's a roof and a bed. please donate now to help people affected by hurricane ian. your support is urgently needed. >> we have a treat for you on the way out it wasn't too long ago that nancy pelosi opined that ms-13 gang members have a spark of divinity, these are people who leave their victims in the middle of the street.

according to nancy pelosi they are god's children. she really believe all that? we have now some reason to doubt it. it was just a couple weeks ago democrats on martha's vineyard expelled 50 illegal immigrants who showed up, they sent those illegal immigrants to a military base. within 48 hours. nancy pelosi had no problem with that, in fact she encouraged it to. today we learned what she really thinks about illegal immigrants in a senior moment, she said the quiet part out loud. >> we have a shortage of workers in our country and you see even in florida some of the farmers end of the growers saying why are you shipping these immigrants up north? we need them to pick the crops down here. >> we need them to pick their crops? plantation nancy pelosi loves illegal immigrants? she even loves gang members who show up in murder people, why? because they are god's children. also because she needs someone

to sweep the floor of her nail salon and pick the crops. to the issue get out of jail free cards and racism of the voting booth? that's exactly what they think. and i'll be with you again first thing tomorrow morning fox and friends weekend. i would love if you check out the will cain podcast downloaded at foxnewspodcast.com. tucker will be back. ♪ ♪ >> sean: welcome to "hannity." chaos in new york criminals now are roaming the streets. we have disturbing new video that shows a violent felon brutally assaulting -- we showed you earlier in the week a random attack on a subway platform near the airport, the attacker previously beat his own grandmother to death, was out on parole for a variety of other crimes. that woman, the victim i can't believe after that beating she was able to ge