see what you mean by that. we have to look at what pauly invested in gm and ford. we'll promote trace, who has a new nickname. i think it's dreamy trace. he has a show on at midnight, but only from the west coast. it's kind of like cheating. "tucker" is up next. i'm watters. this is my world. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: good evening. welcome to "tucker carlson tonight." so the question of who blew up russia's energy pipelines to europe, not just a question in the news, it's a historical question, we've addressed it a couple address already, it's not a question anymore. on television, they're assuring you that obviously the russians did it, vladimir putin sabotaged his own pipeline with his nation at war, putin intentionally destroyed russia's most vital

natural asset. why, you ask yourself, would putin do that? well, because -- because -- well, no one has explained why putin would do that. bad people do bad things. that's the idea. former cia director john brennan showed up on cnn the other day to add his version of the story, and it was clear right away that this was no ordinary cable news segment. brennan was instead conducting a scientific experiment designed to determine just how stupid cnn viewers are. these are the people that believe joe biden who told them covid was a pandemic of the unvaccinated, that men can become women just by saying so. clearly they have highly credulous, but the question remains just how credulous are they? what won't they believe? well, in the name of science, john brennan decided to find out. watch. >> do you think russia is behind the sabotage of the pipelines? >> i think all the signs point to some type of sabotage. these pipelines are only in

200 feet or so of water. russia has undersea capability to easily lay explosive devices by those pipelines. i think this is clearly an act of sabotage of some sort, and russia is the most likely suspect. >> tucker: he-he-he. the russians are certainly the most likely suspect. well, of course they are. did you ever doubt it? once putin got done electing donald trump president and finished dropping off hunter biden's laptop in delaware, he said about sabotaging his own natural gas pipelines, his main form of currency and leverage over europe. his next move will be nuking moscow, part of a diabolical plan to achieve world domination

by destroying himself. that's effective what john brennan told cnn's viewers. did they believe him? sure he did. john brennan used to run the cia. he knows which lies work. he's an expert. tony blinken, by contrast, is not an expert, he's a failed rock musician who somehow became the secretary of the united states. he's happy to lie, but not good at it. at the beginning. last week, blinken pretended to be baffled. no one benefits from this year, not in a million years could he imagine who would do something like that. that was tuesday. by friday blinken admitted, actually, we did it. tony blinken didn't use quite those words, but no mistaking what he meant. watch. >> it's a tremendous opportunity for once and for all to remove the dependence on russian energy, take away from vladimir putin the weaponization of energy as a means of advancing

his imperial designs. that's very significant. and that offers tremendous strategic opportunity for the years to come. >> tucker: now, we don't have a super-long attention span, but this was compressed in the space of four days. last tuesday, the largest act of industrial terrorism in our lifetime was a baffling crime, but by friday the same event had become, quote, a tremendous opportunity, in fact a tremendous strategic opportunity for the years to come. it's a good thing. now, that's an admission. that's the clearest admission we're ever going to get. no one could miss it, least of all the russians. the biden administration is responsible, either directly or through proxies for the destruction of the nord stream pipelines and the economic collapse that will follow. that's true. it's done. so the question, where does that leave us? that's the problem. this act leaves us, the united

states, with no option but total war with russia. there's no offramp now. there's no way out. we are all in. no matter what that means, no matter where it goes. are you shock by this? was there a vote on this? did someone ask your opinion? no. it's been happening for months in slow motion. it's been hidden from public view by the near total blackout imposed by american media outlets. so you probably didn't know any of the details. for example, in march, the turkish government tried to broker peace in ukraine, and came close. wasn't reported widely. ukraine was prepared to guarantee neutrality, meaning it wouldn't join nato, what the russians wanted, and in return the russian government would retreat force from ukraine, and the global economy wouldn't need to be destroyed, nobody would die in a nuclear war. negotiations to that point advanced to the stage that vladimir putin pledged to meet

with zelensky to sign a peace treaty, he was ready for a dialog, but couldn't act alone. he's not the independent leader of a democratic nation. no, not even close. that's a fiction. he's a client of the biden administration which runs his country. idealogues within the biden administration did not want a negotiated peace in ukraine. they wanted all along, and it's clear now, a regime change war against russia, period. so that's what they are now getting. on friday zelensky announced that ukraine is applying for full membership in nato on an expedited basis. what would happen if ukraine were to join nato? by definition, an immediate world war in which we would be a major participant. article five of the nato charter, the mutual defense clause, guarantees that would happen. that's not an opinion. that is a fact.

everyone knows it. yet remarkably, democrats in congress cheered it on. we're quoting, ukraine's fight is the reason we formed nato in the first place, said mouth breathing congressman mike quigley of illinois. i think we need to support this. oh, yes, we do. nancy pelosi said no problem. of course because he has no choice, zelensky, the puppet of the democratic party of the united states, read from the same script. on friday zelensky said he will accept nothing less than the removal of vladimir putin as the president of russia. watch. >> ukraine was and remains the leader of negotiation efforts. it is our country that always proposed to russia to agree on coexistence on equal, honest, dignified and fair conditions. clearly with this russian president it is impossible. he does not know what dignity and honesty are.

therefore we are ready for a dialog with russia, but with another president of russia. >> tucker: so that's the demand, putin must be removed from office. putin, of course, has no intention of leaving. you'd have to take him out. you don't have to like vladimir putin. you don't have to like anything about vladimir putin. you can hate vladimir putin, and most americans do, but you can still understand how totally deranged talk like this. it's the definition of reckless. consider their own descriptions. for years, democrats and the defense establishment they control have told us that vladimir putin is crazy and evil. he may be. let's assume it's true. they've said it. is that the man you want to publicly threaten with extermination? he controls more than 6,000 nuclear warheads. so if you push him hard enough, why wouldn't he use those espn? by their own description of him, he would. we would have a nuclear war. but let's say as a best case scenario you're able to kill

vladimir putin before he could launch those 6,000 odd missiles against the united states or any other country. where would that leave russia, the country he controls? russia is not a rock. russia represents an eighth of the world's total land mass. it is a huge country and a highly fracious country with a large muslim population. what are the chances that in the ensuing chaos, which we are forcing on russia, in that chaos, what are the chances that one those 6200 nuclear weapons might wind up in the hands of someone who is truly crazy and dangerous to us and to the world? well, let's see. what happened to saddam hussein's stockpiles of conventional weapons after american forces captured saddam hussein ? lots of americans died and the country split apart. multiple that outcome times infinity, and you understand what our leaders are proposing

here, just how deranged they are. they should know better, because they've done this before, but they learn nothing. they were never held to account and never learned. if you're not punished, you don't learn. they're ready to make the same mistakes, but on an existential scale. not just the wackos, the discredited ones, bike the buffoon that's our secretary of state. here's david patreus. >> still get worse for putin, and for russia. even the use of tactical nuclear weapons on the battlefield won't change this at all. jake sullivan has publicly stated that the u.s. has communicated to rush what would happen in response to that. >> what would happen? >> well, again, i have deliberately not talked to jake about this. >> yeah. >> just to give you a hypothetical we would lead a

collective effort to take out every russian force that we can see and identify on the battlefield in ukraine, and also in crimea, and every ship in the black sea. >> tucker: oh, that's reassuring. so russia launches nuclear weapons, we'll just sink their ships. really? you think it would end there. that would be the first use of a nuclear weapon in almost 80 years, since 1945, but you think you can cain the inevitable chain reaction with a conventional response. we'll just sink their ships. no problem. apparently david patreus does think that. in washington, he's regarded as a genius. by local standards, he certainly is. suddenly everyone in authority, everyone with a megaphone, everyone with actual power, is thinking and talking just like david patreus. no problem. the daily beast, the tip sheet of the mid wits who run our government, just had piece

today. putin has left the world no other option but regime change. no mention of the inevitable consequences of regime change, a crazy person with nuclear weapons, and you're telling him in public you're going to kill him and hoping for the best. if he launches nuclear weapons, which apparently you've accepted as a possibility, we'll take out his ships. we'll just sink his fleet and move on to the next naughty dictator. we'll show him. that's the depth of the analysis of the looming catastrophe that we're all facing. last night on "60 minutes" scott pelley, who is reported to be smart, is probably respected, he had the opportunity to interview zelensky's wife, a full partner in running that country, but there's no word on where this war could go, which is nuclear. instead scott pelley used the opportunity to suck up, talking about how ukrainian flags are

everywhere on bumpers in new york city. watch this. >> are you stronger than you thought you were? >> everyone is stronger. i'm not unique. >> may i show you photographs in the united states? this is a picture i took on fifth avenue in new york. >> wonderful. >> this is a bumper sticker, where i buy my groceries. i took this picture on the east side of manhattan. what do you say to the american people? >> tucker: we apologize, if you just threw up in your own mouth. that's "60 minutes," the serious news show that gets to the heart of everything. are you ever fired of being so brave and wonderful? that's the level of analysis we're getting. showing the wife of the president of ukraine a bumper sticker with ara with the ukraig

on it. we really love you. this is true lunacy, an entire country ignoring, led by leaders who spermize in ignoring the things that matter, imminent catastrophe. this is not an overstatement. this is not the inflation rate ticking up two points, or a loss of 15% in your 401(k). this is nuclear war. underneath it, the people rolling the dice, understand what's exactly at stake, even if the american public has no idea, and where he know from a recent psa from new york city, that tells you what to do with the russians lob nukes into midtown. here it is. >> so there's been a nuclear attack. tonight ask me how or why. just know that the big one has hit. okay? so what do we do? step one, get inside fast. you, your friends, your family, get inside. stay inside. shut all doors and windows. have a basement? head there. if you were outside after the

blast, get clean immediately. remove and bag all outer clothing to keep radio radioactive dust or ash away from your body. >> tucker: oh, yeah, keep radioactive dust and ash away. like cleaning the gutters, right? be sure to put put chem lawn on the spring. buses in new jersey warning about radiation poisoning. do you know what to do in a radiation emergency? no, it doesn't matter. this is all make-believe, play-acting. if you live in a big metro area, there's not anything you're going to do during a nuclear exchange, because you'll be deed along with most other americans. the overwhelming majority of americans will be dead. those who survive will starve to death because all agriculture will be destroyed, along with billions of people around the planet. so it's time to update your assumptions about the technology here.

these are not the bombs that flattened nagasaki. they are incalculatebly more powerful. you hit new york. you take out miami. so a nuclear war means not that we get to take out the black sea fleet. it means the end of the world. and people who work around this stuff understand it. they're really afraid. no one else seems to have any idea. why is that? glen greenwald has been watching this unfold. he joins us tonight. thank you for coming on. it seems to me, no matter how you feel about putin, ukraine, the war, anything, the threat, the very real in-your-face threat of a nuclear exchange right now that they're openly talking about would require the media to start telling people, hey, this is real, but nobody is. i wonder why that is. >> if you look at the history of american wars, tucker, over the

last couple decades, they're incredibly similar, the way they convince americans to support u.s. involvement in a war, they personalize a particular leader, get us to hate that leader. oh, saddam hussein in iraq is a terrible guy. in syria, he's a tyrannical force. gadhafi in libya. yeah, let's take out these tyrants. then, you know, hundreds of -- of -- of -- of billions dollars later, and lives lost, polls always show that americans come to realize they regard those wars as a mistake. and the reason is they realize that no benefits came to the united states and american citizens by virtue of u.s. involvement in those wars. let's apply that framework here. the consensus in washington is that we are closer to the use of nuclear weapons than at anytime since the cuban missile crisis

60 years ago. there's a very real threat of a nuclear exchange, or even a direct confrontation with russia and the united states. and over what? over who governs and rules, not even ukraine, but the donbas, the eastern region in ukraine, where a majority of people identify as ethic russians and want to be russians, and there's no huge debate about the possibility of a nuclear war, because everyone knows the minute you step up and step out of line, there's a hoard of people ready to call you unpatriotic, a traitor, an admirer of vladimir putin, as i know is being done with our very segment right this minute by all those media matter people and people online. it's a repressive atmosphere. it's squashing a debate that we absolutely have to have. >> tucker: we're losing track of reality. if a nation has nuclear weapons, and you believe even

theoretically they might use them, you have to treat that nation differently. you may not want to, it may be unfair, but that's why nations seek nuclear weapons, because you can't boss them around. if you ignore the possibility that your entire population could be killed, you're not fit for leadership, because you're insane. our leaders are there, insane. >> there's a sense purposely cultivated to believe that the use of nuclear weapons really isn't a realistic possibility, even though we have had the use of nuclear weapons in our -- in -- in the last century, when the u.s. did it -- in japan for world war ii. we came very close on at least two or three occasions, the u.s. and russia did, these two same countries, to exchanging nuclear weapons and risking nuclear annihilation, including the cuban missile cries, because the u.s. felt that the russian president in cuba was so threatening we'd have a nuclear

war over it. it is madness to assume that for russia, what is an existential war, if they actually start losing it, or nato really starts escalating, was we've been doing, that the chances of vladimir putin using nuclear weapons is zero. this is a dangerous delusion that i think a lot of people are operating under. >> tucker: that's totally -- it's the craziest thing i've ever seen. let me ask you, since you were in brazil, we spoke you for our documentary there, and we were in rio, and up until about 20 minutes ago, we were told that bolson aro would get flattened. what's happening there? >> they got races wrong by 20 or 30 points, always in favor of

the brazilian left. there's a runoff between the left wing candidate. i would put bolsonaro is the favorite. even if loses, the movement that he created, is incredibly powerful. the biggest party in the house and the senate. they have governorships of the key states. none of the polling data, or the brazilian media, predicted that, because they wanted, i think, to manipulate the outcome of the election through these fraudulent polling -- or at the very least polling that's radically wrong. we'll see october 30th when the runoff takes place. >> tucker: yeah, not only in brazil. i want to hit you with breaking news here. this is a fox news alert. air raid sirens blaring across tokyo, obviously the biggest city in the world, in japan, government there warning that north korea has apparently filec missile into japanese airspace. the japanese in tokyo being

instructed to shelter indoors immediately. of course we believe our vice president was just in south korea. glenn, what do you make of this? >> i mean, it's hard to analyze the specific event, since it just happened. but what i will use it for is, again, to say when you start talking about things like major countries using long-range missiles, a lot of times the reason escalation happens isn't even because the countries want it to, but when hostilities are intensified enough, miscommunication and misperception happen. that's when you get involved in a war like the one in ukraine things are incredibly dangerous. the world is a dangerous place. these weapons can kill hundreds of millions of people at once. we're playing with fire, tucker, by not even being willing to debate this out of fear that we're going to be called names. i think it's crucial that we recognize the importance of it. >> tucker: yeah. i think you're exactly right. i mean, it's our job to say what

we think is true, regardless. we're looking at pictures right now of air raid sirens in tokyo. certainly all of this adds up, at least at first glance, to a world in turmoil, that is in some very deep way resetting. you know, those postwar norms and institutions that we often hear the foreign policy people describe seem to be collapsing to some extent. >> it is true that none of these things happen, during the trump administration. the russians annexed crimea under president obama. they invaded georgia under president bush. nothing happened during the trump years with all of this kind of instability. we're seeing it again. the reason in part is because people look at joe biden and know he's a dotterring leader

who's lost much, if not most of his mental capacity. a lot of countries around the world see that as a signal to start exploiting the situation for their own interest. i believe that's exactly a factor. >> tucker: it's the drunk stepdad, do what you want. you're exactly right. glenn greenwald, thank you. it was october of 2020 that we sat down with the man called tony boblinski, a business partner of the biden family, and he showed us concrete evidence that joe biden was involved in these business dealings, that his family was selling his political influence as vice president to the chinese government in return for money. so since that interview, which was suppressed, we have learned a lot more about why so many americans never heard that story. mark zuckerberg, the ceo and founder of facebook, confirmed that the fbi pushed facebook to bury that story. in other words, the fbi became

directly involved in a presidential election on behalf of the democratic candidate. so we decided it was a very good time to go back and speak to tony again at length for a full hour. it was a remarkable interview. it's going to air tomorrow night for the bulk of the show. one of the questions that we had for him, did the fbi agent assigned to investigate your claims ever follow up with you. this response, we had this conversation just a moment ago, tells you everything. watch >> listen, we know tony is cooperating, we provide the information he's providing. we will follow up with you, would. we'll definitely have him come in for follow-up interview. i haven't heard from him since. >> not at all? >> no. >> no communication whatsoever? >> no. >> since before the 2020 election? >> correct. >> that's shocking.

>> shocking, yeah, one adjective. >> tucker: so that full interview with tony bobulinski, which is fascinating, in some ways more shocking than the interview from two years ago, airs tomorrow night 5:00 p.m. on the fox news channel. it's also been, since we keep track of anniversaries, five years since the largest mass shooting in american history, october 1st, 2017, at manned may bay in las vegas. we decided to go out to las vegas and visit the scene. >> a fox news alert right now. horror unfolding overnight in las vegas. >> run!

>> someone help me, please. please. please. >> tucker: it was five years ago this week, october 1st, 2017, that police say a man in his 60s, called stephen paddock, smashed out the window of his hotel room on the 32nd floor of the building behind us, the mandalay bay, and rained rifle rounds down on a crowd of concertgoers, there for a country music festival, jason aldean was performing 400 yards from the window. police say he continued to fire until he shot himself to death. that's how they found him when they breached the door and entered his room. in the course of those moments, he committed not simply a horrible crime, but by some measures the most horrible crime in american history, the largest

mass shooting ever recorded in this country. 60 people murdered, 850 injured. we covered this when it happened. every media outlet did. despite a lengthy and expensive investigation, a huge number of unanswered questions, some of them the most basic questions about that shooting, remain unanswered. a few days after the crime, questions emerged. who was stephen paddock? he had no criminal record. he had no obvious political motive. in fact, he had no obvious motive of any kind. >> he's a man who spent decades acquiring weapons and ammo, living a secret life. much of which will never be fully understood. >> tucker: could he have done this alone? the circumstancal evidence suggested possibly, but possibly not. how did he get so many forearmss and ammunition into a hotel room without being seen? >> what do you see? >> an armory.

so many guns and magazines, stacks and stacks of magazines everywhere. >> and witnesses, where were they? at least one fled to mexico. questions emerged into the investigation of this crime. >> you look at the weapon obtaining, different amounts of tannerrite available, what was this accomplished on his own? >> tucker: those questions were never answered. the local authorities and the federal authorities never provided any sort of explanation for why steven pad tok, a man, again, with no criminal record, would have committed a mass murder. to this day, it is very difficult to get even the most basic questions answered about this. >> we have been able to answer are the questions of who, what, when, where and how. what we have not been able to definitively answer is the why stephen paddock committed this act. >> tucker: so of course in the

absence of facts, conspiracy ththeories emerged, quickly swatted away and pronounced ridiculous. the central question why was never answered. we think that's an essential question, that we have a right to ask it. wear not alleging anything. with he don't have a coherent theory as to what might have happened, but it's clear that the answers we got from the federal government were completely inadequate. this is the largest mass shooting in american history. someone should be paying attention. we're going to stay on it to the extent we can. for two years, you've heard nonstop about covid. you probably heard about a much more widespread health cries, one that affects most men in this country. in a moment, we'll show you a first look at our new documentary on that topic. also the same company fulled involved in wuhan research got a

hi, my name's steve. i lost 138 pounds on golo and i kept it off. golo's changed my life in so many ways. before, i was over 300 pounds. now, i literally have the ability to take a shirt off and go out in the sun where i would have never done that before. try golo. it works.

>> tucker: it's one of the post amazing stories in the last decade, but like most of the real stories it's been ignored and suppressed. here it is, just before covid began spreading around the world, shutting the world down, a researcher bragged about manipulating coronaviruses in a lab. now, at the time his nonprofit was funded by tony fauci's company to conduct these experiments. >> you're av a virologist, you n build the protein, insert it into the backbone of another virus, and do some work in the lab. >> tucker: since that interview, we have learned that it is very

possible, indeed likely, that coronavirus, covid, leaked from a lab in wuhan. in fact the same lab where he was conducting experiments on bad coronaviruses. now, at the very least, if you're not going to send the fbi to his house, so many americans are getting the fbi sent to their house, so maybe the biden administration would think of doing that, but at the very least, they'd pause before sending more money to the eco health alliance knowing what we know. but no. a new grant to study bat coronaviruses. alex berenson is the author of "pandeemia," the man we've gone for porn two years for a reality check on all of.

is this really happening? >> it's basically the same research that they were doing in china in the years leading up to the emergence. >> tucker: why wouldn't you do this research in the united states? i mean -- >> the bats are there. and so if you're going to -- you know, you have to actually capture the bats and get whatever viruses they're carrying in order to perform the research. now, look, i think you know, and i think my readers know, i'm not a conspiracy theorist. okay? but it's hard to understand why the nih is doing this. they know there's going to be blowback here. okay? they know as soon as you talk about this, or i talk about this, there's going to be blowback here. so there's only two reasons i could think of they would do

this. one is it's just a pure power play, we don't care what you think, this guy is our guy, and we're going to continue to fund him. the other is a bit darker, which is there's a community of virologists out there that won't admit this came out of a lab, and continue to insist it jumped from a bat to a human or from an bat, an intermediate animal to a human. the problem is, they've never been able to find a precursor virus. okay? it is quite possible in a year, they'll come out of the caves with what they claim is the precursor virus. if none of us believe them, it will throw more smoke up and make it harder to prove that the lab leak is really what happened. >> tucker: that's an interesting theory. never occurred to me. >> unfortunately plausible, right? >> tucker: yeah, it is. i'm just trying to process it. really smart. i'm going to think about that tomorrow morning when i wake up. alex berenson, thank you very

much. so there's a huge health cries in this country ongoing, has been for decades, getting no attention, affecting everything else. it has to to with testosterone levels. test tone levels in american men are collapsing, affecting everything else, when you change the hormones in someone's body, you change that person. hard to reproduce, to continue the species, if testosterone is going away. so we looked into this for a documentary called "the end of men." here's a first look at what we saw. >> testosterone levels in american men are declining by about 10% per decade, 1% a year. sperm counts have plummeted 50% in the last 40 years. if that trend continues, we won't simply be weaker than our grandfathers, we won't have grandchildren of our own. we don't have to be the spectators of our own defeat. we choose this road, not just

for ourselves, but for our children. we are need to make america healthy again. we just need the motivation. >> tucker: the end of men. you're not supposed to care about that, but we fervent do, and you should to. it's out wednesday on fox news. well, we've been worried for more than a year now on the show about vaccine side effects. in particular myocarditis, and in particular the effect of this vaccine on children. unfortunately it's entirely real. we hate to say that, but it's true. in a moment, we'll, so to speak, to a mother whose son developed mmyocarditis after taking the shot. that's straight ahead.

clear evidence that some of these chemicals causes problems with reproduction. what? >> we need a renaissance. >> a country is as strong really as its citizens. >> no one in washington seems interested at all. it's a joke to them. >> if men can't reproduce, the world is over. >> we're headed for a calamity.

>> tucker: so shortly after the first covid vaccines came out, and were administered, people started reporting weird side effects. data emerged showing that the vaccine appeared to cause an

increased risk of heart inflammation, called myocarditis. researchers in israel got closer to the truth and found, quote, a probable link between receiving the second dose of the pfizer vaccine and the appearance of myocarditis among men age 16-30. no one seemed to care. people were being hurt, killed, but the vaccines were never halted or slowed down. as a result many young people may have developed very serious debating health problems. emily says her 14-year-old son is one of these. she's a mother. her son developed myocarditis after taking the shot. emily joins us tonight. emily, i appreciate you coming on tonight. i know there's pressure not to talk about this. we're grateful that you're willing to. tell us your son's experience, if you would. >> well, first of all, thank you for having me. following his second dose, he woke up in the middle of the night with chest pain. we had known that this was a

possibility, just hearing signals out of israel. so immediately took him to the emergency room, where ekg was abnormal. long story short, he was admitted to the acute cardiac floor. scariest moments of my life, of course. his troponin continued to increase. he stayed four days, months of activity, follow-ups with different specialists. it's been life altering for us. >> tucker: yeah. well, it's the nightmare, considering 14-year-old boys don't typically have heart problems. your son was healthy, i believe, before taking this vaccine. so we have an entire medical establishment designed to help people like you. what was the reaction that you got when you said my son had his

heart damaged by a covid vaccine? >> umm, you're a liar, or you're censored on twitter. i don't know if you have the pictures of my son, but i was very pro-vaccination, one of the first out of the gate. then i was ostracized, because my son was injured, no fault of my own, and it's been an eye-opening experience. hurtful. >> tucker: well, it's -- it's a nightmare. i don't know how else to describe it. you were for vaccines. you were not an anti-vaxer, as they say, this was all voluntary, and when your son was almost killed by it, you were attacked. >> right. this began on my twitter feed, sharing pictures of my son getting vaccinated, how excited i was. and then, you know, unfortunately he was one that had the side effect, or the

adverse event. when i shared that, it was met with you're a liar. i was actually censored on social media. blocked by people. the medical community has kind of pushed me to the side, before they embraced me. i'm talking about on social media. >> tucker: yeah. >> and it's just -- you do the right thing, and then you're pushed to the side, and left all alone. it's just been a horrible experience. nothing i could have ever imagined. >> tucker: so many people have been killed or injured, irreparably, and it's so upsetting. oh! i appreciate the bravery it takes to say this in public very much. >> thank you. thanks for having me. >> tucker: georgia maloney is about to become the next prime minister of italy, her party had an overwhelming victory.

professor, thanks for coming on. this seems like a big deal in the united states. what do you think this means? >> the italian people have spoken, elected a solidly conservative government. for decades, left liberals have had this signed idea of liberalism, and when there were conservative governments, one in hungary, conservative governments in central europe, they could dismiss that and say

hungary has its unique way, but the heart of europe won't go this direction. italy was a founding member of the european union, the third largest economy in europe. for italy to swing to the right, the importance of that absolutely cannot be overestimated. the liberal ruling classes didn't want people to in the what was going on there. there's been a discontented silent majority for a while, divided among a number of different conservative parties. italy was hit hard by the migrant crisis in recent years. salaries haven't gone up in about 30 years, something like that. there was a lot of elements there to be put together into a conservative victory. that's now come about. >> tucker: they've been running

a sci-op. i'm going to steal that

>> tucker: kamala harris goes where disasters are. often she causes them. she didn't cause the hurricane recently that crushed florida, but has a new plan to distribute relief, of course, on the base of race. watch. >> it is our lowest income communities, our communities of color, that are most impacted by these extreme conditions, and impacted by issues that are not of their own making. we have to address this in a way that is about giving resources based on equity. >> tucker: so this is immoral, not one thing ever in american life should be distributed on the basis of race ever. however, as long as we're becoming a two-tiered society with a privileged class and an underclass, how about rewarding good behavior? why not give priority to americans who pay their taxes,

follow the law, raise dentist dt children, who don't join gangs or shoot people? they'll never consider it. remember, our interview with tony bobulinski 8:00 p.m. for the hour. trace gallagher begins high school anchor later tonight. here's sean. >> sean: a short time ago, japan issued a warning to its citizens to take shelter after they detected a missile launched from north korea by little rock man. he's back at it. he fired it in their direction. thankfully it landed, and the threat has now passed. we can now see, the world world, can see all the hostile ramsey aregimesaround the globe, therey emboldened by a weak united states president? 36 days until the pipe