for allowing me to set in his seat. i hope you're able to check out my podcast, type jason in the house, jason in the house anywhere you listen to podcasts. sean will be back on monday, the ingraham angle is coming up next. and i hope you have a great and bund wonderful blessed holiday weekend. stay with us. >> hey, everyone, i'm laura eng really this is ingraham angle from washington, thank you for joining us on a friday night. we're going to have full coverage of the doj's continued political targeting of president trump en moments. first, we're going to kickoff this friday a little bit differently with the return of the worst in media f. so what's that? it's easy to become numb to media bias these days so we're going to keep track of the very worst offenders every chance we get. blain now is forest cooper,

project 21 chair, and senior fellow at the national center for public policy research, author of the new barks put your back en change, how biden's policies hertz blacks and ari fleischer, and fox news contributor. all right, let's begin with the big news of the week. this was historic because nancy pelosi has had to give up the gavel and the media, well, they laid it on really thing. >> it's the end of an era and an incredible one. whether you're a republican or a democrat, it's hard not to be in aw, of what he she has accomplished unless you're in a colt. >> this is like watching yourer a great performer on the stage or a great athlete making a great decision oner about the next chapter. >> it would be difficult to overstate the empact that nancy pelosi has left on our country and on our politics. >> all right, ari, take it away. what about that. >> the mainstream media does the exact same thing for republicans

but first the republican has to die. they couldn't stand him, he was a wimp, they kinged him when he was up, kicked him when he was down. after he died they praised him. living democrats, dead republicans toy they don't know did it as well when president reagan from whom i worked died at his funeral you might as well thought they didn't call hem sleeping in the afternoon, rain ray gone he was going to blow up the world, racist, antigay. they hit him on every front but at the funeral it was he was the most palm optimistic president ever. >> that's the criteria. die and they like you. >> all right, horus, on to the next offender. we've seen some really hideous treatment of herschel walker in the media lately but this one i think kind of takes the cake. watch. >> oh, no, he's noter qualified to run for office. let alone be a member of the senate. nonetheless he's being kept propped up. they know he's not

the best quality candidate but it doesn't matter because they're comfortable with him being in that position because they know he'll never control oar run anything in their lives. >> hoar us, demeaning, horus, demeaning, disparaging, just doesn't begin to describe that but your response there? >> well, it's curious, been none of this wassed -- what kind of skills did he bring to the final? it's amazing if juror an enabler of this administration and willing to pursue some of the worst policies in the name of enabling the biden administration you're wonderful, you're celebrated. if you stand up and say something simple like i love this country, i want to represent the people of our state, we didn't like the lockdowns and if i'm elected we're going to make sure those don't happen again. then suddenly there isn't any disparagement to great to give deyou. this is remarkable how one-sided the media is in this case. >> and hoar us they kept saying he can't put two words together.

and at the same time biden comes out like i'm very impressed with john fetterman. i mean, the standard said are like i'm impressed with fetterman's performance at the debate but herschel walker he can't put two sentences together. >> well, i don't want to step on mr. fetterman and his challenges. i'll just say this, though, our president, who read that statement , really read it without any irony, maybe he was unir aware of it when he made that comment shunnery, next up, we have a very revealing moment from caitlin collins over at cnn. >> i've been asked a lot and almost basically every interview you've done reeseenly about a 2024 run and running for president. you said you're not interested in it. i guess my question is, if you're a supporter of yours, and you're someone who doesn't live in michigan but wans to see you run, what is the argument for you not running for president?

shunnery, i mean, what is the -- shunnery, what is the -- shunnery, what is the argument shunner manitee to try to get someone else to run. she was really luring old gretchen into the ring already. >> on this one, i anticipate a lot more similar questions to other democrats. i do think there's a legitimacy to press on the democrats are you going to challenge biden. they want that story, it would be a fascinating story if he does. it also just shows they kind of like to bring these democrats at bench and on to the field. they build them up, they praise them. it's so much easier to be a democrat and get praise for the mainstream media than the republican. republicans have no, but the democrats they're full of these great governors and a strong bench just ready to commute whenever the time is right. and the press kind of throws the soft balls too them. >> before we go, i have to have your reaction, both of yo, to this news today that the biden

administration, which of course has drained the strategic petroleum reserve to its lowest levels en ai believe 40 yores is now asking congress for 5 hundred million dollars to, quote, modernize it. noun, saying it's because of the war of russia with ukraine, it's because of global supply issues. but hoar us, it's because of what? what did they do to deplete the spr to these dangerous lowly low levels but they're citing the war with ukraine? >> like the student loan program, this misuse of the strategic petroleum reserve was merelies a means of manipulating the election process. we've got a special council looking into january 6th. we're starting to see sign after sign that a lot of willingness has been made to manipulate the electoral process, and the media doesn't seem to be concerned at all shunnery, how serious.

>> the is serious. this was designed for national emergencies incase the united stateses to war, incase there's a cutoff of energy. it's not designed to help maneuver prices up up and down a dime or a quarter. >> great to se you tonight, thank you. >> i want to address the appalling announcement today by the egregiously corrupt bide andmenstruation and their weaponised department of justice. would you like me to talk about that? this horrendous abuse beaus of power is the latest in a long series of witch hunts. it started a long time ago. i thought the investigation with the document hooks was dying or dead, or over, and the investigation into january 6th and my very peaceful and patriotic speech, you remember? peaceful and patriotically, was dead especially after the record setting 40-point loss of liz chain in the great state of wyoming. i thought that put the final nail in the coffin. lean to find out that the

corrupt and highly political justice department just appointed a super radical left special council, better referred to as a special prosecutor to start the process all over again. we thought it was just about dead and i gain you they get a fair investigation. this will not be a fair investigation. but again, i thought this was all done, or very close to being dump. these people are corrupt and yet they go after innocent people under the guys of rej mlsy. you really say enough is enough. gotta get back to work. gotta prove that we have a great country again because right now it's not great. right now it's a laughing stock all over the world. >> all right, earlier today, attorney general merrick garland continued his campaign of destruction. just three days. garland announced the appointment of a special council. another one to oversee investigations into the former

president. >> the department of justice has long recognized that in certain extraordinary cases, it is in the public interest to appoint a special prosecutor to independently manage an investigation and prosecution. based on recent developments, including the former president's announcement that he is a candidate for president then next election, and the sitting president stated intention to be a candidate as well , i have concluded that it is in the public interest to appoint a special council. >> does anyone actually believe that? this is all in the public interest. the special council. known as john l or jack smith. he begaines prosecutorial career in 1994 as an assistant district attorney with a new york county -dda's office before becoming assistantment 1789 attorney for the eastern district of new york back in 1999. then from 2008 to 2010 he served

for the international criminal court where he supervised all war crimes investigations conducted by the office of the prosecutor. then, he returned to the doj as chief of their public integrity section. and then mr. smith served as the vice president of litigation for the hospital corporation of america. before most recently serving as the chief prosecutor for the special court in the hague. here now, matt whitticker, former trump acting attorney zen and mike davis, president of the article three project and former clerk for justice neil gorsuchem. garland said that trump's announcement and biden's, you know, professed likely run in 2024, were factored in his decision to fame name a special council. bronze that required by trump's announcement on tuesday or some how triggered this decision? justifiably? >> i don't think so, laurie.

it's. good to be with you tonight. he we go again. this is the left's favorite to tool, to appoint a special council and then let the media breathlessly report on every twist and 21er turn giving it some even super rej mlsy. merrick garland misstated a very important fact which is that this special council is not independent from the department of justice. they department is going to not lean use the resources f of the department of justice and the fbi, but also report directly to merrick garland. this is a way for merrick garland to solely control the fate of donald trump's legal cases and i think it is probably the most partisan move he's made to date. >> well, he when asked about the news today, a white house officialed to told fox that the doj payings decisions about its criminal investigations independently and we are not involved. us. mike, we remember that story that leaked to the media this past spring where biden was

quoted by sources as having said inside the white house that he was frustrated with garland. that's garland was acting more like a judge than prosecutor. some how that made its way into the newspapers and suddenly we're not supposed to believe that that has any impack on garland? that biden is himself independent here. >> and biden just made another public comment about this several days ago. also, re, it was biden remember, it was the biden white house that waive president trump's privilege for the mar-a-lago raid. this special council is going to investigation the non-crimes of objecting to the presidential election. if it were a crime the democrats would have been charged for 1969, 2001, 2005, 2017, when they objected too election it's also a non, they're investigating the non-crime of a former president taking a personal copy of his presidential records when he

leaves office. he is specifically allowed to do that under the presidential records act. where the heck is the special council to investigation president biden his son hunter and his brother james when there is clear smoking gun evidence of foreign corruption in china and the ukraine. >> matt, it's just real, i think, a huge mistake. for the biden justice department. this is going to be seen as politicalem. nothing. i'm sorry. and it's going to be seen as an attempt to get a political adversary off the field before 2024, whether they think trump is wounded or not, previous to this announcement. at least half the country's going to not believe the outcome here, whatever the outcome ultimately is. do you agree that this is just politically and legally a mistake for this justice department? >> i do. and i agree with mike that these are legally siege us cases to start with. and you know if youthening about why the special council rule is there, it's a department of

justice regulation, it's because the independent council statute expired and the department of justice didn't want its business. we end up in this moment where it's now used as a weapon to hertz and weaken plight political opponents, but i just don't think that the american people can stand for this two-tiered system of gogos. if you read the special council regulation, the hunter biden case is a lot more on point for appointing a special council than had donald trump case. because there are clear conflicts within the department of justice as it relates to investigating the family of your boss and the person that politically appointed you to those roles. >> making i want to play another moment from garland's announcement this afternoon. watch. >> i wan to recognize the

efforts of the many fbi agent and many other law enforcement personnel assigned to these. they areworking courageously and stedfastly and serving our nation honorable manitee mike, given what we've learn about some of these prosecutors and agent going back to the muller investigation, frankly even before that, will anyone believe this? i mean, it sound like it was the academy awards the only person he din thank was his agent and his manager there. anyone going to believe this stuff? >> roar remember, laura, one of the attorneys on the pleadings on this case was a former democrat staffer in the senate. and so, obviously , that prosecutor has a political bias and she is a prosecutor named on the pleadings. this is the same justice department that went to a biased magistrate jung, bruce reinhardt who had just recused from president trump's simple lawsuit against hillary clintonen six weeks prior because of that

judge's, that magistrate judge's clear bias based upon his facebook post. 13 went back to this judge sinks weeks later and got this unprecedented unnecessary on a former president to get records back to which they were not entitled because the president has the absolute right to these records under the presidential records act. this is stoke from day one and it has been politicized and weaponised against president trump sense day one. >> we all have to remember that the special council's office, essentially, with very few limitations, has an unlimited budget. correct, mike? very quickly, they can spend tens of millions of dollars on this, and well, just like they did last time with muller. >> just like the malar probe. maybe they can hire andrew weissman again, the partisan hack to be the top lawyer on this probe. garland said this special council essentially is going to have an unlimited budget. i would say to president bide fun you want to shine president

trump get back into the white house, indict him. >> i think white house republicans should say we're fought funding this investigation. we're not going to turn our country side down for this investigation. now, late last week, while votes were still being counted the biden administration quietly announced that it would extend the covid emergency through the spring of 2022 23 -- 2023. insame. o core it's not necessary, so why are they doing? doctors are here in moments to tell us what is really going on here. so stay there.

>> this is the part where we have to dig in. and we have to understand that the sacrifices that we've made as a state to avoid a worst-case scenario, are working. and we need to keep going a little while longer to finish the job. >> when we closed the restaurants to dine in and we close all the bars, that is going to mean that people are going to lose their jobs and a lot of businesses are really going to struggle. we know this. >> yeah. we know this now as last tuesday revealed democrats were never punished for their covid overreach. not for traveling out of state when they told others to stay put, not for having maskless dinner parties with friends while telling their citizens to stay inside alone.

so, the question becomes, why want to try to pull the same thing again? now, you already see it happening. currently last week after americans already voted in the mid-terms the biden administration announced it was extending the covid-19 public health emergency there the spring 2023. what goes hand in glove with the newly extended emergency, prey tell? more taxpayer cash of course. earlier this week, biden asked congress for 10 billion dollars more in covid funding. and our neighbors to the north, they're already warming up. >> in response to the worsening trends and existing challenges for our healthcare system, i'm strongly recommending that all onterreons, not just those at high risk, wear a mask in indoor public settings. i'm also recommending that if possible children between two and five wear a mask with supervision if they can tolerate the mask and safely put it on and off. >> joining me now, doctor and

professor, fox news contributor, and a board certified md and phd research scientist. do you think this is kind of the beginning of mask creep in the united states? i kind of, i saw a little bit of it in l.a. over the weekend when i landed and it seems leak this could be in the offing. >> all of the issues are getting recycled again. it's as if we're clearing the board and starting fresh as if we have foe data. if one of these scientists were to go to europe and look at any of these schools that were open free and clear the entire time with no cloth masks covering all the kids they would see that not lean has there ninety nine difference in transmission, but there is no difference in mortality, and the kids are happier. we got a mental health crisis going on right now and that a fact. >> dr. himani fauci said on monday that covid is here to stay, watch. >> it will likely be part of what we have to deal with for many years to come.

i have to be perfectly honest with you, and with our viewers and listeners, that there is always the possibility that we will get a variant that very , very different than had current variant. >> doctor himadi, will this type of messaging ever end? given everything we've seen with how this virus has changed and the real lethality of this virus for most age groups, this is where we are now? >> yeah. so what do viruses do? viruses like to proliferate. they like to propagate through society. if you're virus you're thinking how do i survive? a virus that survives just like the common cold is one that infects very rapidly, spreads throughout, hour doesn't kill its host. lethal viruses like eburgo l ash never last very long because they simply burn off because they kill whoever they infect. it's highly likely that covid is ever going to become the the

pandemic we saw in 2010en or even anything since that. the likelihood of that is lower and lower over time, especially as people build natural immunity which has become award you're not allowed to say, es pells a as people have developed, have gotten vaccinated in the past and even presently, all these things combined create greater immunity, greater resistence, and ultimately the virus has nowhere to go. as much as this messaging is something that keeps coming up over and over again we have to ask ourselves is that messaging really valid or is it more hype and fear? it's lean reasonable to do this kind of messaging if we actually have proof of something. hypothetical fear is we can worry about every day but without any reason why should they be doing that? >> dr. mccarrie when biden got his most recent booster, i've lost track of how many he's gotten, he gave all americans a choice. watch. >> we have a choice to make. can we repeat what happened en the past winters, more infections more

hospitalizations, more loved ones getting sick, even dying from the virus. or, can we have a much bettor winter if we use all, all the tools we have available to us now? >> dr. mccarrie, we have ain't body dependent enhancement in this country baz of successive booster shot. that is a fact. what is he actually advocating for at this point? >> when he says people have a choice, they really don't have a choice. a rot of people are being forced to do this. for those people i would say ask the question where is the data? i'd receive to see the data. they've pushing it so hard, where's the human trial data if. i can't tell if the announcements are coming from big pharm a or the white house, i'm not sure there's a difference anymore, nate have not released the hume donta, why not. >> are you talking about on the boosters shown omicron vaccine. >> and the omicron vaccine supposedly effective against the new variant that is just with us now? >> that what -- >> is it playing catch up? is it behind on the old variant?

we've all lost track. >> it's supposed to be for the omicron strain going around right now but 95 percent of americans have had it. we're ignoring natural imtiny and subjecting people to risks because this is not traditional flu vaccine protein cold. this is a novel mrna vaccine and we have no trial data and there's myocarditis in other men. >> there are other problems too beyond myocarditis. dr. hima diing there are still some schools forcing students to get the covid vaccine like harvard university. the website state in order to register for spring term student have to be compliant with the vaccinations with the flu shot and omicron variant. again, i mean, this is forcing a shot on student that are completely healthy and have an small chance of dying from this virus. don't understand this,

considering you can spread it with the vaccine anyway. you can spread the virus, even if >> exactly, laura. that's the problem. when the vaccines first came out we were told repeatedly by the drug companies, the white house, by so many others, this will prevent you getting infected and spreading it. we know that's no longer true. it was never true. now after so many months and years of experience now, we know that's absolutely false. what is the purpose of forcing people who are perfectly healthy, who are in some of the lowest risk strata to take something which we know also could have side effects. every medical decision is risk benefit ratio. when you have minimal to zero benefit that you have some risk, that ratio may not work out. frankly it is unethical because it is coercive. you course people to take something that put them at risk, even to people around them given what we know about vaccines. on top of that, we have

very little data, especially regarding the by veil yent omicron booster. we have antibody production data, don't have data on anything related to mortality, long covid, serious infections or hospitalizations and for children we have zero data, they're referencing adult data. with lack of data, how are they making the decisions? >> laura: the never ending emergency, you called it early on. watch for the emergency to continue long past the emergency. that's when you start asking hard questions why it is in place. dr. hemmati, thanks so much. we gave raymond the night off for his book tour. we have a surprise guest to take us through the wildest stories of the week. stay with us to see who the surprise is. z ray's a1c is down with rybelsus®. i'm down with rybelsus®. my a1c is down with rybelsus®.

in a clinical study, once-daily rybelsus® significantly lowered a1c better than a leading branded pill. in the same study, people taking rybelsus® lost more weight. rybelsus® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't take rybelsus® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop rybelsus® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. gallbladder problems may occur. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking rybelsus® with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. need to get your a1c down? you may pay as little as $10 per prescription.

. >> welcome to fox news live. details about the killings

of four students in moscow, idaho. according to a coroner, some or all were found stabbed to death in their beds, might have been ambushed while asleep. bodies were found last sunday. two female roommates that live with the victims were in the house when they were killed, authorities don't believe they were involved in the crime. police haven't named a suspect or even a motive. nothing was taken from the house leading investigators to believe it was a targeted attack. authorities have released a map detailing some of the victims' last moves. they're asking anyone with tips or leads to contact them. police are following up on hundreds of leads they've already received. i am ashley stow meyer. for all your news, log onto knocks news.com. >> laura: normally we would be introducing raymond royal for friday follow east, he ditched us for his book tour.

don't have any fear. come on, we'll still have fun. it is still friday. we are so thrilled to be joined by fox news contributor and host of fox across america on fox news radio. jimmy, great to see you tonight. i have to start with the drama over at twitter which i know you have been following intently. the left has been in a spiral since elon musk takeover. >> yes. my favorite thing in the world. everyone on the left is losing their mind over elon musk buying twitter while driving a tesla. is there ever a dumber time to be alive than right now? this guy is the devil, hold on, let me plug in my car. but i love elon musk for doing this because basically they turned twitter into awoke daycare. they were getting free food, had wine on tap, the only thing they were missing was nap time. they didn't do that because they didn't want

to april joe biden's style at the white house. >> laura: you may think election results out of nevada and arizona were a total mess, but here's a reminder that things could always be worse because this week, jimmy, a small town in michigan broke a city council election tie by drawing names out of a hat. the winning candidate knew she won when she read elected on a piece of paper she chose from a bucket. this sounds good to me at this point. i hope maricopa county watches. >> i would definitely speed up the process. here's the issue, laura. they still have to count mail in pieces of paper. so we're not quite out of the woods on this yet. we were told it will be a few more days. like come on, vegas, you can count cards but can't count votes? this is embarrassing. i love this. this is national motto. i say we adopt this. i'm on board all day.

>> okay. third on this noble list of ours. this is the most bizarre video of the week i think. you're seeing it on screen now. dozens of sheep have been kind of eerily walking around in a circle for 12 days straight in china's inner mongolia region. you vacationed there at times with your family. is there some psychedelic mushroom thing going on here? i know they're all the rage now. >> i figured this out, laura. these sheep are actually doing an impression of joe biden trying to exit a speech. you know how he walks around, doesn't know which way to go, and the poor band has to keep playing "hail to the chief." i hope the band is getting overtime for the renditions they have to play while we point them the right direction. i think the moral of the story, never buy a sheep a fit bit for christmas, they're just trying to get steps in.

>> jimmy, which one was the joe biden sheep, the one with the floral dress? >> this is the problem. there is no joe biden. that's why they can't figure out where to go. joe didn't have jill, he would be doing this. you're spot on though. spot on. >> you see the two sheep trailing off the circle at that point. >> laura: finally, breaking news that has international soccer fans very, very upset. the world cup announced it is not going to serve alcohol inside the stadiums in qatar where they have the big world cup. your response. they don't allow alcohol in public in the country, i don't know why everyone is so surprised here. >> yeah. you know what else they're not serving at the world cup? gay people. they're not allowed in, okay? for all of the talk of tolerance in fifa in soccer and inclusion, if you're in qatar, you're

not saying a word about being gay. number two, when it comes to beer, budweiser's parent company paid $75 billion sponsorship to be part of the world cup and can't even sell the damn beer. >> laura: what? >> i know! i can't support that. soccer is boring, i need a double fist and helmet on my head to get through a soccer match. i think it is hilarious. >> laura: what happens if you sneak in a flask, probably never see you again, right? you're gone. >> never again. to be clear, look at me on the tv now. last thing i need is more beer, laura. i'm actually okay with this. if only the qatar government was here to can you tell me off last night at the patriot awards. >> laura: that was a late night. believe me. the fact we're doing the show tonight is quite stunning, okay? we have lots of trouble tonight. >> real quick. my facial recognition software didn't recognize me this morning. that's how hard i went last night. i couldn't unlock my phone

looking at it. bad place to be, laura. i need jesus, help. >> laura: i saw you walking up and down the hotel floor on the third floor. you were trying your room key on everybody else's room, that was embarrassing, jimmy. i'm sorry. hotel security had to get involved. >> you promised me you would keep it quiet. >> laura: 224, 226. jimmy, you're the best. great to he zoo you tonight on a friday. take care. in moments, what does the gop ballot harvesting operation look like? and we're going to show you how republicans can win more elections going forward, wouldn't that be nice. stay with us.

>> laura: all right, this is fascinating and actually good news. they have been pouring other election breakdowns. this will be the sixth time that republicans took the house. it will be the second closest margin of victory for the winning party since 1970, and probably since the 1950s. the only closer house race in terms of popular vote was 1998. look at what the democrats did in terms of turnout in 2018. in 2014, the democrats got

35.4 million votes for the house. in 2018, they got 60.3 million vote. now, the gop actually increased their vote from 2014 to 2018 by over 10 million votes. but in 2014, they beat the democrats by 4.5 million. and in 2018, they lost to the democrats by almost 10 million. but the democrats have not been able to maintain that fervor. as of now, the gop has 53.3 million votes. that's up from 50.5 million in 2018. the democrats have 49.5 million. down from 60.3 million in 2018. see where i'm going here? we saw a similar pattern in the 2020 presidential vote. in 2016, hillary got 65.9 million votes, and trump got almost 63 million votes. in 2020, trump raised his

vote to 74.2 million, but the democrats raised their vote to 81.3 million. so it is an open question right now whether they can maintain that same level of excitement. now, our plan, the plan we've been talking about is working, but the angle has been saying since 2020, we have to do better with harvesting and early voting to match the democrat efforts. by no means should we underestimate the democrats' ability to turn out more votes than they have in recent history. right on cue, georgia democrats are now suing to open up early voting on saturday of thanksgiving weekend. >> there's this interpretation of a rule now saying that the working people of georgia cannot vote on saturday, despite saying just days ago that counties could hold early voting that

saturday. we believe this is not only wrong but it is a clear misinterpretation of the law. >> laura: yeah, rafael thinks the rule should change after the game has started. okay. but republicans of course need to have a plan to counter this and luckily they have a good model in georgia from brian kemp. while abrams had hundreds of supporters knocking on doors for her every day in the final stretch, kemp's campaign focused on data driven operations specifically designed to compete in early voting. kemp was able to win pre-election day by 6,000 votes, blow out margins on election day proper. joining me, jason 199sneed.

you say it must be a multi state effort going forward. how does the gop now make that a reality? >> well, i think that the first thing we have to recognize is that you can play by the rules as they are but still push for reforms after the fact. i don't think that anyone who looks objectively at laws that allow legal third party vote trafficking can see anything other than red flags. but if that's the law in places like nevada where it is, you have to play by the rules to win electionses so you can reform the election system and make it easier to vote and harder to cheat. i think that the reevaluation of the ground game strategy is really interesting and i hope that continues going forward. >> laura: again, i keep saying this. you can have great candidates, you can have all the issues on your side, but if you do not have an early ground game in early vote and can't match the democrats vote for vote before september 30th, forget it. i just don't think you're going to win. i think that's just established at this point. now, democrat elections lawyer sam, all around

sort of sleaze bucket markey lie as commented on the lawsuit we mentioned in the intro. check it out. >> this is really a brewing scandal frankly that i think deserves a lot more attention. it is clear from context of the new law if the republican wants to show itself as having turned a leaf, no longer about voter suppression, but is about empowering voters, this is their chance. this is their chance to take the common sense interpretation of this law. >> laura: jason, they want to start early voting for 2024. if they could, they would start december 1st of 2022. this is just ridiculous. >> i think that's right. i think they absolutely would. what's really at issue here is the black and white text of georgia's law which says if you have a thursday or friday holiday, there will be no early voting on saturday. that of course is reference to thanksgiving weekend which is coming

up. the democrats want to force early voting in certain counties, at least allow it in certain counties on the saturday of thanksgiving weekend which the state of georgia says is a weekend that election workers should be spending with their families. i think if anyone earned a weekend off to enjoy turkey and watch some football, it is the men and women that spent weeks working long hours to help make the georgia election a remarkably successful one. but once again, ma mamarc elias is in court trying to change the rules of voting in the middle of an election for partisan advantage. >> laura: you have to hand it to the democrats, they try to game the system every time. sometimes they succeed. jason, great to see you. thank you so much for joining us. this is important for future conservative success. thank you. >> thank you. >> laura: up next, video of what i was doing in florida before our show last night, the last bite. we'll explain.

that's night i had a distinct honor to present the awaaward to fox veterans. here who received it. >> whose service have been in valuable and protecting our freedoms. they have a true champion, one man that i had a chance to get to know through many years, his dedication through thick and thin is inspiring. and, the recipient of tthis year's service veterans award, goes to the gary senese. >> what an amazing man? i have known him for 20 years and he never seizes to absolutely to

inspire people all across this country with his generosity and his entire foundation and the fox nation we say thank you for put on an amazing show last night. it was so many people, if you didn't get to come, you can come next year. that's it for us tonight. thank you for watching. it is america now and forever. greg gutfeld takes it all from hep rhere. ♪ ♪ >> yeah! where are we? look at that. [ applause ] >> who would have thought, huh? who would have thought? happy friday! [ applause ] >> let's welcome tonight's