ciroca lesbian. i don't know what ciroca is. i know what lesbian is. jimmy, is this you? it's pronounced "fala." "tucker" is up next. always remember. i'm watters. this is my world. ♪ ♪ >> tucker: good evening. welcome to "tucker carlson." tonight we'll start with a advertise. what do you have when you find sam bank man friedman, janet yell 11, and y y yes 11ski in oe

room? president zelensky sits atop a money laundering scheme so brazen the democrats won't allow it to be audited. yes. these are three people who could badly use a federal investigation. they're not getting one. instead they're being celebrated, held up as uniquely fascinating people by "the new york times." in case you missed it, today was the annual deal book summit. that's a money making event the newspaper advertises as a single yum with, quote, top business leaders. tickets went for $2500 apiece. they were all there, apparently in their capacity as top business leaders. thank you so much exclaimed the moderator, when sam bankman-fried finished speaking. thank you. with that, the audience applauded hartley. "new york times" were clearly

impressed by sam bankman-fried, one of the most prolific thieves ever. whatever. he seemed like a nice kid. it was an amazing display. this event doesn't tell us about the guests, at some point history will render its judgment about them, but it tells us about the people who invited the guests. if it's okay to treat sam bankman-fried like another naughty celebrity -- sam bankman-fried, everybody, applause, applause -- if you can do that, then who's off limits? who's beyond the pale? well, as it happens "the new york times" spent the last few days telling us, delivering yet another hyperventilating lecture about who we're allowed to associate with and who we must avoid at all costs. it depends on political loyalty. some people, "the new york times" explained, have views that are so reprehensible, they're off limits. you can't be in the same room with them, talk to them, ask them questions. their opinions are like smallpox, communicable and deadly. these are the thought criminals.

thought crimes are the only crimes that matter. other crimes, not such a big deal. murder, rape, carjacking? no. as "the new york times" has often told us, people who do those things are the victims of your racism, so they deserve compassion. by the way, so do good liberals, can always be forgiven, even when the things they've done are objectively very, very bad like tanking the u.s. economy or stealing billions from investors and using it to buy bahamian real estate, or bringing the world to the brink of world war and get rich doing it. liberals can do this, and you can applaud them, because in the end their hearts are in the right place. they believe the right things. with that in mind it's no surprise that no one at "the new york times" bothered to ask zelensky where exactly all the money has gone, an accounting of the billions of your tax dollars

that have disappeared into pockets of ukrainian oligarchs in tracksuits. he demanded much more of your money, which of course he promptly took. here's part of it. >> on november 15th, the biden administration submitted a new aid request, which if passed, brings the total amount that the u.s. has provided in -- in -- in assistance to $105.5 billion. we're going to be speaking with former vice president mike pence later. there's been a sentiment among republicans, who now control the house in the united states, from kevin mccarthy, who said there should not be a blank check. what do you tell them? >> we are absolutely open, and we are thankful for the

assistance. it's not quite correct to speak about $100 billion as a value of the war for the united states. the value is lives of people, if ukraine does not stand through this war, they will spread into other territories, and maybe to other continents. our people is the biggest failure. tell me how much our people cost. i don't know. >> tucker: ha-ha-ha. okay. so support me or putin's going to invade atlanta. by the way, you no choice, because if you object send billions more, you're a bad person. you don't care about ukrainian lives. you're a moral monster! moral blackmail this crude does not typically work because nobody with self-respect would stand for it. what? settle down, son. get the germans to pay for it. it's their continent. that's what a normal person would say, someone who had

self-respect. unfortunately for the rest of us, congressman michael mccall of texas has no self-respect, so he folded immediately. mccall is the top republican on the house foreign affairs committee. so just in case that you imagined that throwing out nancy pelosi and electing a republican congressman is a huge victory would mean that someone would push back against biden's foreign policies, you're mistaken, because michael mccall just informed us, because we're good people, so is zelensky, we'll be sending mr. zelensky, and his pals in tracksuits, billions more of your money. watch. >> i want to pick up where colonel milburn left off. he believes there should be longer-range weapons sent to you can a. would you approve of that? >> 100%. he's absolutely correct. my criticism of this administration was before the invasion. since the invasion we've slow-walked this process. we are going to provide more

oversight, transparency and accountability. we're not going to write a blank check. does that diminish our will to help the ukrainian people fight? no. we're going to do it in a responsible way. i think it's very important that the american people understand what's at stake here. >> tucker: so the u.s. military, not ukraine's military, our military, the one that's supposed to protect our country, is running out of equipment and manpower. just so we're all clear about what michael mccall's priorities are, we're sending advanced weapons system, yet more of them to ukraine, and that's in addition to what we've already sent, bigger than the entire russian military budget. if that's not insulting enough -- and of course the point of this is to insult you, degrade you, make you fully aware that your country's interests come last, because you come last on the list of priorities -- they're going farther than that. we've also decided to pay ukraine's energy bills. it's kind of odd we're doing that, at a time when we have our first real energy crisis since

the mid 1970s. a manufactured crisis, but a crisis nevertheless, a crisis causing americans to freeze in their homes because they can't afford heating oil. that's a perfect time to send energy to our friends in ukraine. the whole region. here's tony bl blanken. >> we will stabilize ukraine's energy grid and keep ukraine's power and electricity running. we've also submitted a request to congress for $1.1 billion to secure ukraine and moldova's energy sector and restore their energy supply. >> tucker: so why is this continuing when of course joe biden could call zelensky, who effectively works for him, i mean close family connection there, of course, his son worked in ukraine, could call zelensky and say no mas, get the money from europe, wrap this thing up, people are dying, the rebuilding costs of this country are beyond what we can pay, this is at a dead-end, let's come to a settlement, and of course that could happen in a week if they wanted it to.

they don't want that to. they want the war to keep going. why is that? aha, because everybody is getting rich. the one thing you're not allowed to say, hey, maybe we should stop this war, because, of course, the cash spigot would stop flowing. that's why at the deal book summit, the top business leader zelensky -- in fact, he's a top business leader, if you want to be honest about it -- went after elon musk, because elon musk suggested maybe we should get a peace deal. here he is. >> it seemed that elon changed his opinion, and we began to hear all kinds of appeals. i don't know if somebody is making an influence on him or he's making those choices himself. i always say very openly if you want to understand what russia has done here, come to ukraine, and you will see this with your own eyes, without any extra words. after that you will tell us how

to end this war, who started it, and when we can end it. >> tucker: ha-ha-ha. all perfectly reasonable. can't have peace. send more billions. so it's interesting, is it this last few days, has been like the few days before that. there's been a lot of moral outrage in washington about bad ideas. of course some ideas are bad on both sides for sure. but ideas aren't criminal. actions are criminal. as always, the real criminals are getting away with it and getting richer in the process. pedro gonzalez noticed all of this. thank heaven. he joins us tonight. pedro, you know, i assume you voted republican. a lot of people did. with the hope that someone would put the brakes on foreign policy that clearly doesn't help the united states. in fact, hurts the united states, integrates the united states, and now we learn that it's full speed ahead. how did that happen? >> well, tucker, thanks for

having me. that's a good question. it's one that mcdaniels seems to want to figure out, which she formed a new gop advisor council to inform the direction of the republican party. right now, as you noted, that direction looks like helping biden line the pockets of defense contractors. republicans like to complain about biden weakening america, but the amount of war material that we're sending overseas to ukraine has actually depleted our own arsenal. so guys like kevin mccarthy and mitch mcconnell, who benefit from these things, they're not selling biden the rope with which america is hanging itself, they're gifting it to him for free and adding a bow on top. what else are republicans up to, right? again, it seems like they're committed to doing things, unlike democrats, they don't benefit from any of this stuff.

their voters are so angry at them. you ask yourself, they have to be doing something good, right? john thune, the number two republican in the senate, is saying going into this fight over the debt ceiling their priority is going after social security and spending cuts, right, because we have to save money and be fiscally responsible so that we can continue giving that money to ukraine. republicans are also helping democrats push the eagle act, which amounts to a green card giveaway for big tech companies they often complain about in their fundraisers, that will primarily advantage indian and chinese workers over americans, who at this point would be better off being ukrainian, because maybe then republicans would be answerable to them and explain to them and give them some help for once. >> tucker: if you're going to be a republican, at least you can say i'm for fiscal continence. you know, i want to know where the money's gone. nobody is taking up marjorie taylor greene on her offer/demand to audit where this

money has gone. we don't know where the money has gone. clearly billions has been stolen, but republicans don't want to know? how does that work? anyway, pedro gonzalez, i appreciate it. >> they don't want to know. >> tucker: no, they don't want to know. you wonder why. thank you so much for coming on. >> thank you. >> tucker: sam bankman-fried was the headliner -- sam bankman-fried, everybody, applause, applause -- at "the new york times" deal book summit a few hours ago. can't overstate how weird it was. andrew sorkin from "the new york times" who promoted sam bankman-fried on television at length in previous months and years asked how customers could learn to be safe on line as if sam bankman-fried didn't rip off his own customers. he-he-he. the main takeaway sam bankman-fried isn't stupid. he knows he's bullet-proof. he knows the democratic party and the sec won't touch him.

watch sam bankman-fried explain why he's not worried about criminal charges. >> how concerned are you about criminal liability at this point? >> so i don't think that -- i mean obviously i don't personally think that i have -- you know, i think that the real answer is that's not -- sounds weird to say, but i think the real answer is that's not what i'm focusing on. i mean, look, i've had a bad month. [laughter] that's not what matters here. >> tucker: i've had a bad month. it's all about me and my personal journey, but being held accountable by regulators, the justice department, the u.s. congress, these are my friends. i paid for them. boy, if there's ever been a clear window into the deep corruption we need to get rid of if we're going to return to representative democracy is that right there. sam bankman-fried seems so confident that he's untouchable that he admitted in public to co-mingling funds between ftx,

his crypto exchange, a separate company he controlled. that's the kind of thing regulators would normally care about, but in this case it didn't. listen. >> ftx didn't have bank accounts globally. we're trying to get them. it took us a while. took us a few years. and, you know, there are customers who wanted to fire money to ftx. i think in the meantime, umm, some of them were wiring money to alameda research to get credit on ftx. and, umm, i think that was a substantial sum. umm, and i think that ftx's internal accounting did correctly effectively try to debit alameda for those funds. >> tucker: you know, "the new york times" is not a tv show. it's a newspaper. when they want to find out about somebody -- we can speak from firsthand experience -- they put a bunch of reporters on the story for months, and they may interview the person they're

writing about. they also interview a lot of other people. they create a full account of what happened. they're not doing that with this guy. they're bringing him on to allow him to whitewash what he did. but aware that he may have had a bad week, as he just said, bankman-fried tried to whitewash it. >> was there a co-mingling of funds? it appears there was a genuineko mingling of fin funds of ftx customers that were not supposed to be comingled with your separate firm? >> i didn't knowingly comingle funds. i wasn't knowingly co-mingling funds. >> tucker: vic, thank you so much for coming on. so what was lacking i felt in all of this was the moral outrage you would associate with someone who apparently stole billions from retirement funds, but "the new

york times" treated him, like, you know, you did some bad things, or whatever, but there's no -- it's not like he's donald trump or something, right? what is that? >> the thing that was striking about this, tucker, it reminded me of a lot of what we saw in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, if you had firms that, again porksed themselves, they wanted to be the good guys. the goldman sachss, the morgan stanleys. they got bailed out directly by the government. this is a guy who wore a t-shirt and shorts. what was fascinating from watching that today wasn't sbf, he's good at deflection, using techno carattic language to deflect responsibility, but interesting was people in the audience, nervously laughing, distancing themselves from him. when i thought about what happened in 2008, the interesting part about this, the people in the audience, the other financial it is, trying to distance themselves from the guy who wore a t-shirt and shorts,

are not that different from him in kind. they may be different in degree, but not in kind. i think that's the people that struggle with with this sbf story, if they're in elite finance, when they look at what happened in 2008, you know what, it's an uncomfortable parallel and uncomfortable similarity. in a certain sense he's one of them and they're one of him. that was one of my takeaways from watching him today. >> tucker: that's the deepest truth in all of this. vivek, thank you. >> thank you. >> tucker: no one is obviously ever punished by the people in charge for lying. what you don't want to do its accidentally tell the truth. you will be punished for that. a reporter was punished, because he told the truth about what happened at the pelosi home on that famous friday night in october. that reporter has since vanished. where did that reporter go? that's straight ahead. plus, the nhl, the national hockey league, has apparently

gone woke. kind of weird, because a lot of republican donors support the nhl. a lot of its viewers aren't liberal. so what do they think about their sport league being hijacked by lunatics? that's next.

>> tucker: so what you don't want to do when you're covering the pelosi family is tell the truth. nbc news reporter miguel almagar apparently didn't know that. he did real journalism on the attack on paul pelosi, and he's since vanished from the air. what happened to him? trace gallagher joins us with more. >> he's based in los angeles, just like me, if you watch "nightly news," "the today show," he was on the air all the time. now he's been off almost a month. he was suspended without explanation in early november. he's been off social media, except for posting a few vacation pictures. so far, almagar, nbc, his agent, have issued a statement on why he left, when he comes back, if he comes back.

it's a suspension being handled likely witness protection. here's the thing, we don't know what was wrong with the report he filed on paul pelosi, because nobody will tell us. all we know for sure it goes against the common narrative, specifically challenging whether paul pelosi was in danger when police arrived. watch. >> av a knock and announce, the front door was opened by mr. pelosi. the 82-year-old did not immediately declare an emergency or try to leave his home, but instead began walking several feet back into the foyer, toward the assailant, and away from police. >> but the same details have been reported by nbc's local affiliate in san francisco, and local nbc forces tell fox digital they believe almagar had different source that offered the same information. remember, almagar didn't just right a controversial story and have it edited without the brass at nbc signing off on it.

someone likely approved the story, and several people approved it, and just as likely several people have signed off on saying nothing. tucker? >> tucker: ha-ha-ha! spoken like a man who knows television. the great trace gallagher, available for a full hour, "fox news at night," midnight every night eastern time. of all professional sports, the nhl, hockey, probably has the most conservative fan base. and owners. more than 75% of national hockey league owners donate to republicans. the owner of the l.a. king is a mega donor to the republican party. it's a little weird -- ar maybe it's not weird at all -- that the nhl has decided to push woke propaganda on its fans. gary bettman and league vice president kim davis say they want fewer white people playing hockey. >> looking at the hockey landscape in five years, what

does progress look like to both of you, commissioner bettman? >> to me, progress looks like that we become more reflective of the communities in which our teams play, that there are more black players of both s exes, players of both colors of both sexes and we're more diverse than we've been. >> five years from now, i want hockey to be on the lips of boys and girls of color, just the way soccer and basketball and baseball is on their lips. something that they see as accessible. >> tucker: so attacking white people. okay? i guess that's common. you don't notice it. it's totally immoral, but it happens. then it gets more esoteric. "transwomen are transwomen,

transmen are men." theo fleury is a hockey legend in canada and in the united states. he played in the league for a long time, most of his night. he joins us tonight. theo, thank you very much for coming on. what do you make of this? were race politics a big part of hockey when you were playing? >> no. god no. you know, i think the reason why we all gravitated toward hockey was first and foremost it was fun. then secondly, you know, there was no politics involved. you know, we played this sport because we absolutely loved it. for me personally it was an escape from what was going on in my home life at that time. you know, i fell head over heels in love with the sport. you know, i was really good at it obvious, and pursued a career

in this amazing game that we play. >> tucker: so clearly, you know, political forces hijack professional sports as a way to brainwash the young men who watch professional sports. that's the entire point of it. strategic. why doesn't anybody say back off? >> well, i think it's a really -- because we're so divided, tucker, and deep down hockey players are, you know, guys who are compassionate and empathetic, something we don't want to get involved in. it's an argument that we can't win, you know. so the reason why -- you know, it doesn't matter to us who plays the sport, whether you're transgender, gay or whatever.

the reason why we play the game, the reason why the game is so amazing and so great, is it's for everybody. right? the reason why we play the game is it's an escape from what's going on in our lives. >> tucker: exactly. >> unfortunately politics has no place in any sport, whether that's football, basketball, hockey, baseball. politics should never be a part of any kind of sport whatsoever. >> tucker: of course not. by the way, if they were calling for affirmative action in the nba, i'd be totally opposed to that. but they never will. theo fleury, thank you so much. >> thank you, tucker. >> tucker: so a few weeks ago we introduced to you a pro-life spider-man who scales skyscrapers all over the country to call attention to his beliefs. he was just arrested. he's out of jail. and free to join us, and he's going to, next.

>> tucker: turns out when you degrade and demoralize institution, as the biden administration has, people don't want to work there anymore. that's true of police departments. that's true of the u.s. military. it's also true of the border patrol. as a result, the border patrol is running out of border patrol officers. to fix the shortage, federal air marshals are being deployed to the southern border. they're needed on airplanes. dozens of marshals don't want to leave flights. why would they? it's their job to protect flights, not the border. don't we have a military for that? why is the biden administration trying to order air marshals to the border like we don't have a national guard? >> the bottom line is they're desperate. they do not want to declare a national emergency on the border, so they think they're secretly going to sneak air

marshals off the planes, and we're not going to be quiet about it. we're going to fight this. we don't think it's appropriate. look at what happened on 9/11. four aircraft were taken in a matter of moments. 2,977 people were murdered. 6,000 injured in a matter of minutes. we're going to supplement the border patrol. we're highly skilled, operating 35,000 feet at a moment's notice, may have to utilize deadly force. these jobs are easily backfilled with ngos or contractors. i have no idea why they're trying to pull the air marshals out of our skies. and we're at the busiest time of

the season for travel. >> tucker: they could send the national guard in. there are other ways. the biden administration admitting they're doing this? is this happening in secret? >> they are admitting they're doing it, but won't declare a national emergency. dhs secretary , you're making or skies not secure. >> tucker: a lot of people in america are pro-choice, pro-choice, but not everybody is signed up for the full pro-choice program. what does that mean exactly, pro-choice? a number of states, including california, have legal abortion up until the moment of birth. who is t for that? up until the moment of birth,

really? that's murder. to draw attention a 23-year-old man decided to climb skyscrapers all over the country, free-climbing without a rope or harness, pro-life spider-man. he's scaled huge buildings. yesterday he climbed the 54-story ritz-carlton tower in los angeles. >> he's scaling the building, climbing 54 floors up with climbing chalk, but no rope, to take a stand once again. the 22-year-old is pro-life and left a sign on the side of the ritz carlson in support. >> tucker: pro-life spider-man was promptly arrested, the police accused him of suffering from a mental illness. he's out of jail thankfully and joins us tonight. mason, thank you so much for coming on. looking at those pictures, you

know, are you afraid? i have to ask the obvious question. that looked legit terrifying. >> yeah. tucker, we're seeing so many people live their lives in fear, christians included, but we're not called to live our lives in fear. we're called to live our lives in faith. at conception, babies in the womb have their own unique dna separate from the mother. we need to stop this from happening, regardless of the backlash or consequences. i get called a radical, but the most radical thing you can do in the pro-life movement is to do nothing. >> tucker: yeah. so you're mentally ill now, i guess, is what they're saying? it does seem like a handy catchall dismissal for people whose views we don't like, i've noticed. do you feel you're mentally imbalanced? >> i stopped trying to convince people that i'm not crazy. ha-ha. you know, i'm doing this to

raise money for women who really need help, women that are in a crisis pregnancy. you're seeing states like california issue proposition 1, which legalizeds elective abortion up until birth. i climb these buildings to raise money for an organization called let them live and show these states what loving thy neighbor really means. it doesn't mean killing your child. it means supporting them through acts of charity and providing things like job counseling and help with their bills so they can get back on their feet. >> tucker: well, that's kind of the point. i mean, again, always try to be-minded. a lot of good people describe themselves as pro-choice, but if you really care about women, wouldn't you want to support women who don't want to have an abortion? they'd probably like another option, but they don't. why don't more people support those options, i wonder. >> well, i really do think we have a culture of murder. i think that these people don't care about these women.

they care about their agenda, what they're trying to push. they want less people -- the less people on the earth the less people that they have to show love to. >> tucker: last question. how did you get arrested? were they waiting for you at the top? did they take you to jail? >> yeah. you know, they -- they always wait for me at the top. i get to the top. they're always slightly impressed. i tell them what i'm doing. this time i'm climbing to help a specific mother named olivia. we're trying to raise $50,000 to help her and other women in a crisis pregnancy at letthemlive.org. hopefully we can make that happen, and i accomplished the mission. >> tucker: most of us do the thanksgiving turkey trot for charity. we're not climbing a tower with no ropes. don't fall. mason, thank you. >> yeah. thank you.

tucker, the offer still stands if you want to come rope climbing. i'll be your rope gun. >> tucker: no way, man. but i admire you. thank you. >> yeah, thank you. >> tucker: so the biden administration has been telling you contradictory things, but for a while they've been telling you to get a covid shot every year. now the hhs secretary is telling you you need to get a new shot every two months. think about that. can you imagine anything more irresponsible than that? every two months. okay. we've got details straight ahead.

- [narrator] if your business kept on employees through the pandemic, getrefunds.com can qualify you for a payroll tax refund of up to $26,000 per employee, even if you got ppp. and all it takes is eight minutes to find out.

then we'll work with you to fill out your forms and submit the application. that easy. getrefunds.com has helped businesses like yours claim over $1 billion in payroll tax refunds. but it's only available for a limited time. go to getrefunds.com powered by innovation refunds. ♪ [christmas music] ♪ ♪ ♪ weathertech gift cards have the power to wow everyone on your holiday list. offering a variety of american made products. weathertech! nice! like floorliners... cargo liner... tablet holder... boot tray... cupfone... sink mat... pet feeding system... anti-fatigue comfortmat and more. order the weathertech gift card instantly for the perfect gift at weathertech.com

♪ ♪ >> tucker: so in order for people to believe the science, the people explaining the signs have to be honest and consistent, otherwise no one thinks anything israel. so it is important.

with that in mind, the biden administration has been telling you for a while the covert vaccine protects you for a full year. well, that's not true, the vaccine does not, unfortunately cannot stop you from getting covid. but they are still telling you to take it every year, but then suddenly, with no explanation, that has changed, the hhs secretary just made this announcement, "if it has been over two months since her last dose, make a plan to get one now." in other words, you need to get a new covid shot every two months, six times a year. huh? who thinks that is a good idea? bill clinton, just pop tested positive for covid, yet said hes grateful to be vaccinated and boosted, because he will say anything. this is a radio show host in washington. he joins us tonight. thank you so much for coming on. you think people are about to get very, very cynical about vaccines, about public health

authorities, about health care in general, because the people in dishonest. what's the cost of this? >> every two months? i don't even change my air conditioning filter that frequently. insane that you would do that. think about the genesis and how people don't trust anthony fauci are these people in charge. during the 2020 campaign, he had kamala harris and joe biden claiming they would necessarily get the vaccine because it was developed under donald trump and they weren't sure, and after the election was over, then they said, well, if you get the shot, you'll never get covid. you are a brick wall. you will stop that from getting anywhere. that virus. actually, if the ticket every two months? notice, nearly three years into this, that they keep pushing you toward shots and never toward a treadmill. like, the one thing that could actually stop covid from killing people is if people lose weight, and they never talk about it.

all they talk about is the thing that has made pfizer and moderna the rich as they have ever been, which is all these shots the government keeps pushing, with free advertising that sizer doesn't have to pay for. as a result of that sweetheart deal you will never hear the side effects. every other drug on television, you know when you get half a commercial, "and the side effects include --" you never get that for the shots because the government has a great deal. they set it up pfizer and moderna and they're pushing it every three months. >> tucker: so destructive for our society. honestly, you don't expect to believe politicians, but public health authorities, you need to trust them. vince, good to see you. >> thanks, see seven. >> tucker: "the new york times" spent all day criticizing him. but not just sam bagman freed, also kiddie porn. for real. that's straight-ahead. ♪ ♪

hi, i'm sally and i lost 52 pounds with golo in a year and a half. i struggled with my weight for a long time due to my thyroid issues but since being on the golo plan and taking release, the weight has not come back. (upbeat music)

>> tucker: over 100,000 americans died last year from fentanyl. the biden administration doesn't seem to even notice. what makes it more upsetting is that a lot of these were not fentanyl overdoses. these weren't drug addicts who took too much fentanyl. these were normal people who had no idea they were taking fentanyl and were killed by it. it's happened a lot in the state of ohio. so it happened to a young woman, lindsay keenan, whose mother we happen to know, kim evans, who came on the show to explain what exactly happened, because we think it's worth keeping track of this epidemic. this interview is part of a new episode of "tucker carlson today." here it is. ♪ ♪ >> i got the phone call at 2:00 in the morning from my mother. not the police. i was listed next of kin. but my mother had said, "i am so sorry to be the one to tell you this, but lindsay is gone." and i asked, "what happened?" she said, "we don't know."

and i said, "we need closure." and i said, "would you please --" because i live two hours away. my parents, who have been married 55 years, my dad drove my mom and they went to identify her for the police, and when my mom had called me, i asked her to make sure they do an autopsy. get an autopsy, because i want to know exactly, for closure, because not just myself, but there were three babies that have a life now without their mother. >> tucker: i mean, it's a nightmare. it's the definition of a nightmare. you talked to her the afternoon of october 6th, and she's got a cold. she's headed to cvs for nyquil, and then your mother is calling you saying your only child is dead. >> absolutely. >> tucker: how did she die? >> the autopsy report came back, there was 3.4, 3.5 milliliters of fentanyl and carfentanyl in

her system. fentanyl and carfentanyl as a mixture is flat out death. >> tucker: like a lot of people who have died in the last year, she had no idea she was taking it. the full interview with kim evans is up right now on "fox nation." about ten days ago, as you probably remember, images surfaced from a photo shoot done by the fashion house, balenciaga. that included images of young girl holding a teddy bear in bondage gear. a separate set included images of a supreme court opinion, striking out a law against child pornography. the word "sex" visible. none of that is accidental. what are they promoting? the media weren't interested so they were in promoting the story. now it's getting coverage, but it's not critical of what balenciaga did. the coverage in "the new york times" is critical of anyone who notices what balenciaga did. "the new york times" published a piece entitled, "when high

fashion and qanon collide." in other words, you are a crazy person and probably criminal if you notice. this ignited a fire storm that traveled from the internet to fox news, fueled by allegations that the brand condoned child exploitation. why would you think that? just because they were exploiting children in the ad? the teddy bear in bondage gear, ooh, sounds like qanon stuff. have the best night. sean hannity right now. >> sean: can we leave the kids alone? make it really simple. do science, math, history, and computers, let them go home and play in the street. it maybe a key occasionally fight and call of the bad names. that's the way i grew up. tucker, thank you. welcome to "hannity," and tonight we are tracking multiple developed stories. a full hannity investigation tonight into the next democratic house leader. longtime election denier, tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist, and that is hakeem jeffries. plus, we are going to bring yo