consistent with the first amendment, they said the first amen amenamendment is not absol well-done, democrats. i have a feeling that tucker is going to handle this story. stay on fox and i will see you on monday. i r am r apam watters, this welcome to "tucker carlson" tonight, one of the most extraordinary moments on social media is unfolding right now as w wwe speak. it began when elo musk took control of twitter. when he bought the company, he promised to reveal its corruption of twitter engaged in politically motor sensorship. well, tonightless than an hour aago, musk began to make good

that promise. twitter shared a discover of documents, these documents are coming out as we speak. what they prove is very serious. those documents show us systematic violation of the first amendment. the largest example of that in modern history. these documents show among other things, political officials in the democratic committee were directing sens senssensorship at twitter tt tthe 2020 election. one rec additional report from the dnc. tthe dnc was telling twitter wt to pull off the site and twitter wwas wwcomplying. a twitter official confirmed the post had bbeen deleted. i grab the firs one, that twitter employee wrote. twitter followed in instructions from the biden campaign. one of the documents prove that officials direct

twitter to remove posts of bibiden. bibi that e-mail included a list of several twitter accounts that criticized joe biden. the reply, quote, "handled, we just checp chechecked," those a remained suspended today. twitter was sending users at the reqrequest at the dnc and the n campaign. that's new. many suspected and now it is absolutely confirmed. the new york post twitter account was banned. why? they had a story that may change the outcome of tthe 2020 election. twitter kn it well. they had accurate information about hunter biden's laptop. joe biden's family in an ongoing scheme to sell influence of the power of the u.s. government to china and ukraine.

that scheme that unfolded over years made the biden family millions of dollars, 10% of that money was reserved as you know for the big guy, meaning joe biden. that was information that may have changed the outcome of the election and that's precisely why twitter prevented its users f ffrom reading it. twitter weno far as to block its users from sharing the new york post story on twitter's direct message. anyone attempting to share the story about hunter biden's laptop was told unsafe. now, that measure preventing users from sharing information privately is something that twitter reserves in normal circumstances only in the most extremextreme cases. extremextrem extrem e but, in case, information that may have hurt joe biden chances of becoming president were invoked. the decision was made at the highest levels of the company

but without the knowledge of ceo jack dorsey, with formal head of legal policy and trust by gadi playing a key role. all suspected now confirmed. now, in public, twitter and its many allies claimed the new york post story violated the hack material policy that twitter had. but at twitter, everyone understood it wwas a wwa pretext, the laptop was nnot hacked. as of right now i is 8:04 eastern time. there is no evidence in this ongoing threat that twitter received confirmation from the u.s. government even that the laptop was fake or from russia. they just just just made it up. one admitted, hacking was an excuse but within a few hours everyone at twitter realized that was not going to hold but no one had the guts to reverse it. trenton

kennedy wrote this, i am struggling to understand the policy bases from marking this laptop story is unsafe. twitter's former head trust and safety explained twitter had to censor the story so donald trump would not be reelected as president. this is an emerging situation with the facts remained unclear. given the severe risks here and the lessons of 2016, meaning trump cocould get elected, we are aig on the side including a warning and preventing this content from bebeing amplified. now, this played out to some extent in public. now, we know it is happening in twitter. the whole country knew that something was being censored. a lot of people could not read it but it was widely known that twitter was censcensoring it and many news organizations. at that time, twitter received a communication from a consultant in washington

who had taken an informal poll of members of congress. democrats in congress supports the censorship and we are quoting, they don't think the first amendment is absolute. in other words, sitting members of congress were encouraging sensorship to affect the outcome of the presidential election. that's illegal. that's election-rigging and it is a direct attack by the bill of rights of our people who sworn to uphold the bill of rights. back to the document, within twitter, others all voting democrats but some with some integrity kept raising questions about this. brandon foreman asks, "can we ask this is part of the of policy," is this consistent with the rules? the general council of twitter, jim maker, that's the former fbi

general counsel who was involved with the interview of michael flynn signed off on the contp concontinued contp conconcontinued cens "caution is warranted," we'll hear from mr. baker very soon. the record shows as of right now only one elected official in the entire democratic party of silicon valley, voicing any concerns at all. so conner reareached out to gaddi and hes wwhat he wrote. this is a violation of the first amendment of principles, i say this as a total biden partisan. she was blblown off by blblown gaddi, by the way, gp good for him. he's a liberal, too. within days, someone called sabo that on capitol hill democrats are very happy with this. they

supporsupported the supporsuppor censorship. this threat is still ongoing and flowing forth. as we speak, we'll bring you information as it comes. we want to speak firt to p to p moranda devine, sh columnist and she's since written a book, she joins us tontonight. tontonight. tonight.tonight. center of this story, what do you make of this? >> i think we have seen quite a bit that's useful. it is not the smoke or gun we hhad hoped for. i feel like el musk held back some materials and there was a tweet that was said he was not seen any evidence that law enforcement warned off twitter from our story. that's just not correct. i have seen a sworn affidavit from the former head of twitter's trust and safety, he was meeting every week before

the election with fbi and other intelligence officials. they warned specifically of what they call a hack and late oper operp opeoperation, operp opeoper a dump of ru information. there was a rumor that was about hunter biden. they seeded that information with the social media giants if the fbi did and then ensured that within hours o our story going live on october 14th, 2020, three weeks before the election was censored. now, we are finding more that there was discussions behind the scene at twitter and quite active argument about whether this was a first amendment problem but the other interesting thing is how little jack dorsey was involved. he was obviously just blindsided, it seems by the people under him who werintende.

jim baker, twitter's number one lawyer who says caution is warranted. that's coming from your top lawyer, you are going to pay attention to it. he's former fbi general counsel very much involved in the russia collusion hoax. >> what's interesting is for the purposes of today's story which i have said five times is still unfolding. elon musk announced earlier that this release of documents was going to be begin at 5:00 p.m. eastern. we are now more than three hours past that and we have not seen everything they're going to release. he said actually the last minute we are getting some facts straight. how likely do you believe it and certain he was leaned on by government agencies, just like everyone who tries to release all the information was leaned on by government agencies. >> yeah, the pressure has to have been immensed. i remember yesterday he met with team cook

from apple who had been threatening even though elon musk says he was not threaten but he was threaten that twitter would be wiped out by being removed from google and apple stores. elon musk met in person with tim cook and strolled around the pond of apple headquarters and came out and saying well apple is not going to do that and never going to do that. obviously, some sort of accomodation was made between the two of them and elon musk given us a redacted version of all the materials behind the scenes because i know from the lawyers who were involved in the deposition last week of fbi agent elvis chan that there is much more with the story with the social media companies and that talk twitter people like, the former head of trust, the

talk moderation guy, he admitted that in one of those meetings tthat tt hunter biden's name was brought up. while zuckerberg had been quiet about that and this particular dump of information from twitter so far had been no mention of hunter biden being mentioned. we know he was mentioned by the fbi to the social media giants so will that cp cocom cocome out in this musk. is he holding something back or facebook was out of the block to censor the new york post and twitter follows suit? i don't know. i suspect elon musk had b bbeen leaned on and he's kept bit of information in reserve. >> there are thousands of pages of documents under sealed. that

would be consistent with the way things work for this country. miranda devine, thank you so much. great to see you tonight. one of the few remainings of the first amendment and the entirentire press core. glenn joining us tonight. thank you so much for coming on. like three tweets into this very long twitter account from matt tiabee. you had nbc complaining loudly that elon musk would dare to release details of censorship, why is not the en enrenp entirrentirp eentire on the side releasing what where he did not know right now. >> the >>pt rp >> they have been

took the internet and remember in 2015 of small few number of cases of expressing violence and demanded increasing amounts of censorship because they became convinced that the reason that hillary clinton lost was because free speech was allowed on the internet and only censorship can save us. now, they're advocate of p of p censorship and are furif anyone trying to restore free speech. >> what have we learned through this? >> it is not as liberal censorship defender, the decisions and the autonomous decidecisions can't be questio

they can sensor anything they want. that's often coming from the democratic party, the majority in the party nor washington that tells these compcompanies compcomp censor this or that. if you don't, rel use our power to punish to p you for your failure to evade. >> that's illegal. i think it is pretty clear supreme court lois rulings on this. how is it continuing? >> absolutely needs to be test cases. there had been decades of supreme court president where city officials would tell book bookstores, if you don't remove these books, you will have all kinds of investigations. when the state, the pressure or private actors and sensors for the government in ways the government could not do directly, that, too, is as free

speech vspeech v speespeech vik yop yyou're yop yyo censoring enough o content. you are going to suffer legal and retaliatory reprisal and it is absolutely dangerous and it is unconstitutional and it needs to reach the supreme court. >> a lot of lawyers, capable lawyers but you hire the fbi lawyerlawyer at the center of rs gate. that's a control over social media company today. >> the >>p > the p >tenta institution in power. i find it mp m mind boggling. tthe cia would have program to influence news outlets and now these news outlets, cnn and nbc hire agents of security stage. people who ran the cia and fbi

ap anand the nsa come on an pronounce the news, they're in bed together. big tech censorship. when anyone tries the do it, these people jumping up and say we can't allow you to restore free speech. it is a crucial weapon, they are completely intertwine and integrated and we are seeing that in the role of jim baker playplayed in the censorship r before the election. >> it is not legal. the agency and pentagon is not allowed to interfere. i don't know why nobody thought about it. you certainly have. glglenn greenwald, great to se you. >> this release of internal documents from twitter. while

dedevine suggested is not everything they have is enough to tell us what exactly is happening in american politics. it sheds a lot of lights. they're still coming out and we'll update you as we get more. plus, barack obama is back aand as aan always and asand as always disp didiscover a long los whilep wwhilep ww confi. we'll show it to you,next. it was the night before christmas when there on the couch you sat on your tuchus, and vegged like a slouch

you watched and you ate with a heart full of gloom when suddenly washington came in the room a christmas miracle, could it be true? he changed the channel to prageru it's on your tv and your smartphone too a gift to your braincells to save your iq and just how high could your iq go? if you never try, you'll never know make a tax-deductible donation at prageru.com

>r p >r p who's this guy a he from? it has been years and no one figured it out yet. now, we learn that barack obama is from the deep south, we grew from a farm in mississippi. we learned it today when he was in georgia campaigning for raphael warnock. >> i got no excuse, i can't be tired. if the men and women who had to endure the stink of discrimination. the smack of

bep bellybelly clubs. it iso had to fight those early fights, those were the tough fights for union rights and voting rights aand aagay rights and women's rights. if they didn't get tired, you can't be tired. >> oh, settle down, boomer. ho many time are they going to hit that well? if the civil rights movement is so great, why are you promoting racial discrimination which you are. nobody asked him that question. tthe accent, well, we are not saying he actually grew up in west memphis, he learned to talk like he did and he learned it from hillary clinton. here she is in is 2008 in selma. >> i don't feel no way tired. i ccome too far where where i startestarted from. nobody to that the road would be easy. >> yeah, that was in selma,

alabama. one of the poorest cities in america. the place gotten much worse. there is hillary or barack obama are doing anything to help selma or baltimore or detroit. speaking of theft, the biggest financial fraud in hin industry. he knows it, too. we have more confirmation that it is probably not going to be punished. jason rant, our crime correspondent is joining us to explain. hey, jason. >> hey, tucker, the disgraced foformer ceo of ftx is being invited to testify before the house of committee. he's unlikely to get the grilling he'll deserve. it is going to be a love fest. maxine waters and an interview today with politico, she asked demop demdemocrat,

demop demdem she asked hi answer some questions of the collapse of the crypto currency of empire. she's chummy with the crp cryptcrypto loser. crp cryptcrypt and as you e from this photo at the event, waters was also smiles while standing next to the vegan crypto nerd. if you are thinking she's showing her excitement after trading recipes, she tweeted this morning she appreciates how candid he's been during "the new york times" conference, she praised her. now, to be fair waters may not be the only one to portray the american people in order to support this democrat donor,

bankman-fried donated and include $3,000 to nine members. he co-hosted a fundraiser for a community member which waters toured in new york. she was nearly as eager to respond and she post a photo with him. she told fox, well, i don't want to get into that, tucker. >> how did she get so rich anyanyp ananyway? anyanyp anan living in a n hohouse. hohop hhouse. jason, alw see you. >> crypto currency investments. >> probably. >> big into bitcoin. >> here is an interesting story. an elderly british royal is being canceled for asking a wop wwoman wop ww asking where she'si don't know, it is racist, i don't know why? shut up, racist! that story is next.

if your business kept on employees through the pandemic, innovation refunds could qualify it for a payroll tax refund

of up to $26,000 per employee, even if you got ppp. and all it takes is eight minutes to find out. then we'll work with you to fill out your forms and submit the application. that easy. innovation refunds has helped businesses like yours claim over $1 billion in payroll tax refunds. but it's only available for a limited time. go to innovationrefunds.com to learn more. ♪ hi, i'm michael, i've lost 70 pounds on golo. i spent thousands on other diets that didn't work. on golo, i spent a couple hundred bucks and got back down to my high school weight. you're not gonna believe this thing is possible but it is.

vo: it's a new day. because covid vaccines just got a big update. just in time for everyone who works. with other people. just in time for... ...more togetherness. just in time to say “oh, you bet we'll be there!” because the updated vaccines can now protect against both the original covid virus and omicron. and that's a moment... we've all been waiting for.

this is a fox news alert rereally an extraordinary mome on social media. on the history of media, we don't say it liglightly. matt taibbi had be gigiven by elon musk of a huge trove of internal documents from twitter. there were so many documents that it may be days until we see them all. taibbi is updating his thread that he says is part is one of the report. this confirmed that twitter had been an instrument of the democratic party used over years to shape public opinion and to censor anyone who criticizes democratic officials and more precisely anyone who criticizes joe biden

in a meaningful way before the 2020 election. it shows the biden team sent twitter a list of twitter accounts to quote, "reveal" and twitter removed those tweets permanently. all this was signed off on jim baker who had been a high-level fbi official wound up as the general counsel of twitter. so according tp to taibbi, these decisie censorship was made without the knowledge of jack dorsey, the founder of twitter. he's fairly committed to the first amendment and did not want to see any of this so he was kept out of the loop.loop. it was gaddi who dr, vijp vivijaya vijp vividadde. the last e was shaped without you knowing it and any voters of the unite states knowing it by this social media company that similar

things happening over google and facebook. certainly twitter we know the last election was shaped by democratic officials without your knowledge censoring a attacks on their candidates. is that rigging election? we'll let yyou decide. yyou dtaibbi is updating his account and documents and of course if something big breaks, we'll bring it to you. we have more on the biden's business life with our two-part, tu tutucker tu tutu carlson's original documentary, it is called "the bid rbid bibiden'srbid bibink," drops on wednesday. emanuel macron visited the white house yesterday. a lot of suck-ups showed up at the white house to toast and supporting the

disaster in ukraine. things got a little weird, joe biden could not remember that you have to l llet go of the hand after you shakp shashake it. shakp shasha here is the [ speaking in foreign lan language] . >> so >> so r>> so ly, the instruction on the card in front of of biden says, grip the handd release. i guess the release part got smudged or something. tthat clip goes on a lot longe tthan we played, we are runnin oout of time. biden was deeply confused but it is not the first t ttim timtime he shared an int moment with macron. they were

filmed together walking on the beach in england. you will notice that macron's arm was araround biden, was there hair sniffing? you know, let your imagination do the rest. this week buckingham palace, susie hussey making a mistake asking one of those activists a simple question, "where are you frfrom"? frfr fr frfrom"?p ffrom"?k she's african. that's all right, you can say whatever you want to be, i guess, in the west, those aare the rules. now, she is saying it was racist for hussey for an 83-year-old woman to ask where she was from about her fake heritage. >> she began to ask me where i

am am from. am am i am from an organization that supports african women and girls. and she says oh, what part of africa are you from and i said, i don't know. that's my truth. where are you reayou really from? i am r from here. no matter how uncomfortable for others, i really experienced racism in an environment that i should feel safe in. >> be quiet, go away, please.r joining us to assess, thank you so much for coming on. this seems to be an attack on an 83-year-old woman for what's perceived as the wrong thing. is anyone pointing it out in the u.k. tonight? >> absolutely. it is an attack

on elderly woman asking a genuine question. on the other hhand it is hhand -- it shows how far we have come and we have not eradicated racism yet. we are at the point where people have to ininvent it. the industry hav to look wherever they can and purposely taken offense. >> tucker, where are you from? >> t r p >> i would say i d kknow -- california. i mean i would be embarrassed but you asked. >> yeah, there is a huge moral advantage in claiming that you have been sinned against but it is an attack that you claim sinned against you, it is an act of aggression, too. >> it is actually. this morning and i will call it hadley, i would not call the name she made

uup. uu she chose an african name that'sthat's jihadi tribe sla don't know if she knows that. whapwhatever she breaching . that's against british law. people walking around not wearing what she's wearing. it is a quite interesting conversation started. you looked interesting and where are you from? that's her opportunity to say, i am from x, y and z. this is where i am wearing this guard. all of her literature says caribbean, african heritage, it is all over the place. she claims she wants to talk about this. she only deals ws domestic abuse with black women. you can all hear if

whether you think it is racist. but, surely when she's taking on new clients, she wants to ask them what's your heritage or where are you from. >> you can't mandate everyone talking about their identity and punish them. i appreciate you coming on tonight. calvin robinson. >> really a reason of hope for the church. so at the beginning of almost two years ago of the cocovid coco pandemic, there was one person that said wait a second, this came from a lab and that was a chinese position and in saying that, she risked her life. she fled china and she told the world that the coronavirus had been created in wuhan by the chinese military. and she didn't get rich saying that, actually. we wondered what's her life been like since now that she's vindicated. she joins us next.

i was hit by a car and needed help. i called the barnes firm. that was the best call i could've made. i'm rich barnes. it's hard for people to know how much their accident case is let our injury attorneys know he how much their accident cget the best result possible.

i had no idea how much i wamy case was worth. c call the barnes firm to find out what your case could be worth. we will help get you the best result possible. ♪ call one eight hundred, eight million ♪

the critical final days of the 2020 election cycle in order and they say this in their e-mails to get joe biden elected. they did the bidding of a political party and elected officials in washington to get biden. they rigged the information of that election. that would include the former twitter general counsel, jim baker was the key player at the fbi. just minutes ago, elon musk wrote on twitter. if this is a violation, the constitution of the first amendment, what is?

there is so much here. other docudocuments posted, revealed twitter hack was never a justification for being in the new york post. they knew it. under twitter's own stated rule, they need "official law enforcement finding of a hack to invoke that policies" says taibbi. this is one part of the twitter file that'll come out in a period of dates that we'll see. one of the things that we have learned already that twitter under pressure from democrats deleted a tweet from the legendary actor, james woods, who had straight outside line by criticizing hunter biden. the dnc told twitter to take it down and so they did. james woods is joining us now by phone. are you there? >> >yes, i am, tucker, so nice to talk to you. >> it is great to talk to you. i vaguely remember when your tweet

was pulled down. did you suspect at the time it was pulled down at the direct request of the national committee? >> i am not surprised at all. i am shocked the way any american would be if you were a target of a president or a candidate and a major political party. here is why i am not shocked, tucker, you may be surprised to know that there was a lawsuit a while back. a woman accused me of saying of a whole bun of stuff about it on twitter. i asked why was somebody saying it about her. it tuturns out the dnc was behind that. i won the lawsuit in federal court. it was not reported very much. i have been a target of these people for six years. they have destroyed my career and destroyed my livelihood and my faith in this country that my family defended in the military since the

revolurevolutionary revolurevolu war. i am about o be inbe inducted revolurevolu war. i am about o be inbe in of the american reserve aleutian -- i can't, you are catching me a bit off guard because i literally just walked in the door. my wife said have you seen your phone, i was at the range practicing for my rights under the second amendment which now i don't have any first amendment rights anymore. i am glad i still have some second amendment rights. i think the whole thing is astonishing. i am for the first time in my life is honestly speechless. >> it is astonishing and as you pointed out civil laws used extensive by the left to crush people on this right, alex jones, had a billion dollars settlement against him and he said something that people did not like and they wrecked his life and the lives of many people and they tried to wreck yours. is there some kind of

legal or civil recourse that you would have against the people who violated your first amen amenamendment rights? >> i can guarantee you one thing, more than anything else you will hear, i will be getting a lawyer and i will be suing the national committee, the democratic national committee no matter what. i am going to stand up for the rights of every american and not so-called celebrity, i am not a celebrity. i am hardly recognized anymore because my career had been destroyed by these very people. i will sue and i am hoping others will sue. it turns outs there are a lot on this list where the dnc targeted us. mccarthy, of the enemy's list. have you no shame? >> yes. >> president biden, all of your

operatives in the dnc who targeted american citizens, have you, mr. president, have all of you at last have no shame. >> of course, the answer is no. they don't have shame. we'll be following that and there may be more, clearly they were fixated on you which i hope you take as a compliment but also propels you forward to bring justice. >> i think it as a compliment but it is a big price to pay. it is not a lot of fun. i love my career for 50 years, i was happy to be an award winning and honored and appreciated actor and i miss my career. these people took it from me. i know it pays a price later in my life. i am not going to take it sitting down. i think these peoppeop peopr peoppepeople e

peoppeop peopr peoppep -- fo other people. let's not talk about me, just these individuals now their lives are destroyed. a director who literally go online and they check every actor who comes in for a part to see who they are following. if an actor or an actress that's followin me, they'll blacklist them. it is about time this is open. it is not just me but if you take the thousands of people that i am sure they are did this to that you got a class action suit, they may not be so happy about that. they are really in trouble right now, i think. this will be something that wewe'll -- they're not going te happy the the long run. what am i going to get out of it? i don't know. i am going to sue. there was a guy that called me a cocaine addict on twitter once. i have never done drugs in my lilip llife. lilip ll i sued him and i

suit. >> you can't talk about it because of the settlement that we did, much more than that. and why would you do it? i want to defend my name, i am not going to let them slander me like this and liable. i am not going to put up with this and if i have to be the flag bearer for this, so be it. i will be proud to do it. >> you should be proud. >> i want to say in closing that you may know i never talk to the press anymore. i have asked everyday. i left twitter as my only source of the public of any statements i may make. those are my words and i am going not going to alter it by doing a slow motion video of me in black aand white and all the crap th did. they have been doing this, i have blocked on twitter for eight months. you know how long

i i was suspended i i was s for? can you imagine? that's crazy. one of this things i have said that bebecame anrbeca bebecameme. these democrats and now i can say it, they are not my enemy, they declared this, not me. when they go around calling everybody oh, toh, this is so on. scratc liberal and you will find an fascist every time. >> well, i realize that you are doing television interviews, you aare always welcome on the sho. that's one of the most amazing conversations i have had in a while. >> i am grateful that we reached you. >> i am shooting from the hips. i walked in the door and my wife

is like have you checked your phone. i was at the range and up at lopez and there is no reception. i looked at my phone and i had hundreds of messages and what's going on? so, i can't speak about this with the informed consent that i would like to and i can't speak intelligently as i would like to. when you see your name on an eneenemy's list -- you want to to your enemy, you know, reall an interesting thing. when you declare somebody your enemy, you can now say you are my enemy, too. the fun thing of the constitution, i tweeted about james monroe, the president of the united states later on, did you know how old he was when they signed the declaration of independence? >> no. >>r p >> sr >> st r p >> he was adams was 19 years old. all of

thesthese old men writing the constitution, they were teenagers fighting for our rights. the mostthe most precious. thef free speech and the government of the united states since fired the take my free speech and throw it in the gutter. there is something that they should do more than anything they have ever imagined in their wildest dreams, the most dangerous man cor corrupted is an american who's not afraid of them and joe biden aand alland all those rats whg with them at the dnc to close down my speech. i am not afraid of you. i am coming for you. >> amazing. what do you think f elon musk so far?

well, elon musk, hunter bin is still be and i can't say this because i don't know the feedfacts, it seems like he's been involved in something pretty interesting on behalf of the big guy, whoever that may be. we don't know for sure. you know -- i think elon musk has quite posp popossibly posp popos possib p saved course rivalling the titanic and i ti think what elon musk had is spent a lot of money like i did in that lawsuit against the guy who lied about me. i am going to do this because it is important to my survival and my well-being. i think elon musk loves this country. it is clear that he

does. why would he spend all that money on twitter j jp jjust -- why would he do unless he could see its values. you have to understand something. back when they had the power on twitter. well, it is a private site and it is not like it is a town square, they can say whatever they want. better not saying it now. but, it wit was in fact the town sq and it was a forum for free speech. if you have a town square and some people are allowed to use it then you don't have a free country. we know when this country of what it was like when certain citizens were not allowed the speech when they had to step on the sidewalk because a person was different skin color was walking down the street, you know? i am not going to compare anything to what black people in america went

through because there is no compapcomparison. there is comparison. >> james woods. i don't know what to say but other than thank you. thank you for coming on and thank you for explaining that. congratulations on your vindication, i will see you sosoon. sean hannity right now. >> breaking tonight z elon musk is officially lifting the veil at twitter. what we are learning about the tech giant's role in 2020 election down right horrific. shared with journalist matt tieby questions from democrats and biden campaign. acted quickly to