to hide the bulge in his neck. no, it was a fashion statement. john fetterman was named as the three most stylish people of the year. he's going to bring carhart to the capital. why are they telling you this? they hate beauty, they hate truth. it's deep. that's exactly what they're doing. the ugly is beautiful. sean hannity joins us now. >> hannity: you're way better dressed than john fetterman. i don't think it's close. >> tucker: that's not saying much. >> hannity: all right, thank you. welcome to hannity. tonight, new damning revelations from twitter with a lot more to come. now apartly elon musk thinks dr. anthony fauci may be in real trouble. we have a full report tonight. the majority in the u.s. senate is vanishing. kristen cinema has now left the party. could joe manchin of west

virginia be next? we have his comments from earlier today. the new york time social security calling this guy, pennsylvania's trust fund brat in a hoody, the one we were talking about, yes, one of the most stylish people in america. we will weigh in in a unique way. but first, we begin tonight with the big guy. joe biden. that's how joe was identified by his son's business partners in communications found on the hunter biden lap top from hell. in fact, hunter's partners mentioned the plan to set aside 10% for the big guy. these emails referenced by "the wall street journal" and "the new york post" and "the washington post" and new york magazine and almost every other outlet in the country in america reveal a highly unethical get rich quick scheme where the biden family collected millions of dollars from sketchy foreign nationals all over the world, using hunter, who had pretty much zero experience to lead the way. now, keep in mind, shady foreign

nationals, they weren't say paying millions of dollars for hunter's business expertise. he was well known to be unstable. also a drug user, addict, and had a lot of serious problems. in fact, emails that were reviewed by the business insider from 2015, they actually show that one potential business partner detailed the pros and cons about paying hunter biden $2 million for a project involving the country of libya. quote, hunter's negatives are he's an alcoholic, drug addict, kicked out of the army for cocaine, chasing low-class hookers, is constantly needs money and many more headaches. he travels with dad. he's connected everywhere in europe and asia and has high access to the highest levels in china. he wasn't selling experience, he didn't have expertise. he was by every objective measure selling nothing but

access and he has zero experience according to emails on his own lap top. talking about a lot of money for pops. the former first lady of moscow, the ukrainian oil and gas giant and the $1 billion became a $1.5 billion deal with the bank of china. so why are we talking about this tonight? well, according to "the washington post," hunter has now high-powered attorneys and all of them in several top democratic strategists, they have created the equivilant lebt of a political war room and they will be involved to slander, besmirch, or sue anyone who shines a light on the shady activities, including members of

the new house republican majority like congressman comber and jim jordan who will join us in a minute. and it includes those who observed the biden family's malfeasance like former business partner tony bobalenski and the owner of the repair shop where hunter abandoned the laptop. and as jonathan turley pointed out, this is a move to intimidate witnesses. members of the media who dare to cover the story may also be targeted by the biden camp. supposedly according to the article possibly they will be the subject of lawsuits. let me be clear. we have asked hunter biden for comment over and over and over again, regarding his activities and his involvement. he and his team steadfastly refuseded to get back with us. i will give hunter biden a whole week of programming if he wants to come on the show and include 15 hours of nationally syndicated radio on 700 radio

stations. he never once denied the authenticity of the laptop or any of the contents. he has not refuted our reporting or anyone else in the media in any way we've seen. on the other hand, the dishonest father, the big guy, has denied any involvement with the son's business activities and he claimed over and over again, we played it many times, that he never had a single conversation with his son about his foreign business dealings. all of that despite photographic evidence showing joe biden with many of his son's foreign business partners, including that picture right there in front of you, with former prime minister of kazakhstan. and by the way, this picture with mexico's most well connected businessman, and this picture joe and hunter golfing from the board member of burisma, the oil and gas giant that paid hunter millions of dollars. he went on good morning, america. experience in oil? no, gas? no. energy?

no? ukraine? no. why being paid millions of dollars? maybe because of your father. we know joe biden did not tell the truth about talking to his son about business dealings but 51 intel experts were happy to bolster the claims. they're the ones that signed on to the letter that discredited the hunter laptop story as having the classic earmarks of russian information, a russian information operation. they knew better but for them getting joe biden elected, that's what really mattered. now kevin mccarthy is promising to issue subpoenas to all 51 intel experts to find out exactly what role they play in censoring the scandal along with big tech as we've been discussing just weeks before the 2020 election. other top republicans have prepared to issue criminal referrals in the hunter biden probe if warranted. that did not stop hunter from

walking up to kevin mccarthy and his mom at a state dinner earlier this month and say hello. it was nice of him. now despite a federal criminal investigation, a forthcoming house investigation, and the legitimate claims about public corruption, hunter is always popping up at official white house events. and this is because hunter and the spire biden family believed they're untouchable. they think they're above the law. and now they're flaunting it, or at least that's how they're trying to come across in public. in reality, the biden camp seems rattled. the legal team is reportedly in a state of disarray and the new political war room wreaks of death prags. -- desperation. as the media likes to say, are the walls closing in? jonathan turley, i want to focus in on this issue of intimidation. are we talking about when i read "the washington post" article, it seems to talk about intimidating witnesses.

intimidating investigators, and intimidating anyone in the media that there is to talk about stuff that we know to be on the public record. does that read the same way to you? >> that's how it looked to me. it's not uncommon to make these attack machines. they're supposed to come out spontaneously to give the appearance they're not being organized. it is very uncommon to have this all late out in "the washington post" naming targets that happen to include the two chief witnesses that are contradicting the bidens. that seems to be an effort to put a shot across their bough saying they're coming for you.

why is it important for them now before subpoenas are issued or testimony is given to issue this warning shot? and i think it could easily be read as an effort to chill people if not intimidate them if you're going to cover this story, they're preparing defamation lawsuits in retaliation. >> hannity: how damning is it in your view, professor, that joe biden repeatedly said he never had a single conversation with hunter or anyone else in the family about their foreign business dealings, but, yet, we have photographic evidence and reports as many as 14 meetings that they can identify of hunter, joe, and foreign business partners. how damning is that? >> i think that's what's in the article. they're going to the scorched earth campaign. there's not a lot left.

the statement made by biden appears clearly and unequivocally false. he said he had no knowledge, no discussions on his son's foreign dealings. >> ever. >> there are pictures of him meeting with the business executives. there are emails going back and forth. and the person who was most threatened in that "washington post" article, bobalenski is the guy who is the greatest threat to biden because he said he met with biden to discuss these deals. he was brought in to help to manage those. it's clear they've declared open season to protect the bidens. >> hannity: if the lied about never speaking to his family about the foreign business operations, if the met with the foreign business partners of hunter, if it can be proven

about the fact that he financially benefitted from these meetings. for example, an implication by hunter he was tired of giving half of the income to pops or paying for repairs on his father's home, etc., if the money side of this is proven, what is the legal potential liability for joe biden, the. president because he said this is an investigation into the of the united states. he didn't say hunter. >> it's not the crime but the cover-up that gets people in to trouble. influence pedaling is a cottage industry in washington. i've been a critic of this corruption for deck case. -- decades. i've never seen anything to the scale of what the biden family

appears to have done. the problems they have are all of the statements that appear now to be false. influence pedaling in and of itself may not be a crime. but the means you use to commit influence peddling and the means you use to cover it up can be. there are foreign transfers that the house is going to be looking at. there are tax issues that are already under investigation. but there's been a lot of people interviewed by federal agents. that tends to be the area where you find the greatest danger of prosecution is making a false statement to a federal agent. now, on top of all of that, the house of representatives appears ready to issue a storm of subpoenas. that's going to increase the risk for people around the bidens. and i think that's one of the reasons we're seeing this preannouncement of a scorched earth campaign, to try to get people to think that you have --

you do proceed at your own peril. >> hannity: i venture to guess your name may be on the list with my name. i'm guessing. i'm usually on every list. it doesn't shock me. jonathan turley, thank you. here now with much more, ranking member of the house judiciary committee, ohio congressman jim jordan. your investigation is into whether or not the fbi has been politicized and whether or not the department of justice is weaponized. we have the twitter files where elon musk clearly said a week ago saturday that the election interference attack took place by the suppression of information on twitter. i agree with him. he talked about how the media is come police it. and how twitt t t t ter became propaganda arm of the democratic party. if you put it together with what we know about hunter bide b and the lap top. look at the buresma deal.

you have a prosecutor, gets fired. son of a b, they do it. and turns out, the prosecutors are investigating the son with no experience being paid millions. what do you call that? >> yeah, right. pressure or sfwim dagues. -- intimidation. never forget, sean, jim comey went to new york to pressure about president trump, the dossier he knew was baloney. it was false. now we get the intimidation that mr. turley and you were talking about coupled with what the democrats have done to the supreme court over the last year, trying to intimidate the court, introducing legislation to pack the court. intimidation is how the left operates. it was intimidation and the whole pressing back and suppressing this key information just days before the most important election we have, the presidential election in the fall of 2020. so, yeah, we have to look into

this and how political that justice department has become. >> hannity: but it gets deeper because the fbi had hunter's lap top since december of 2019. >> yep. >> hannity: okay, then we head to the election of 2020. they knew that the likelihood that this, in fact, would be made public was real. and we have members of the fbi meeting weekly with every big tech company warning them that this type of story about hunter, according to roth, might come out and you may not want to disseminate false information. that sounds like to me the fbi should have known darn well by that point, 11 months later, that laptop was real. they're telling big tech to be on the lookout because it's probably false. it turns out they did intimidate every big tech company. what does that mean terms of putting the thumb of the scales of the presidential election? >> that's what they did.

by telling big tech to look out for a russian disinformation operation, it's all part of their information operation. the 51 guys who signed the letter, was jim baker talking to them? he had to know many of those guys when he served as chief counsel of the fbi. he had to work with those guys when he was spying on trump's campaign and taking information from hillary's lawyer, mr. sussman. when he went to twitter, was he working with those guys? did he participate in drafting that letter or encourage them to draft that letter. you have jim baker involved in trying to stop trump from winning in 2016 and there he was at twitter prevents the from winning in 2020. maybe it was jim baker who was the actual insurance policy. remember we saw the text messages from struck and page. maybe it was jim baker in 2020 helping twitter keep that information from the american people. i don't know, but we need to get to the bottom of all of this so it never, ever happens again.

>> hannity: do you believe "the washington post" and jonathan turley's interpretation of this, that they are telegraphing an intimidation campaign against witnesses, against investigators like yourself, against the media if they dare report any of those things. do you think this is an organized, well orchestrated, intimidation effort to protect the bidens? >> fk oh it is. it's not the first story. there's one four weeks ago right up to the election. politico puts the story out. david brock and his group is coming after anyone who investigates the bidens. they not only told us once, they told us twice. someone tells you once, okay. they tell you twice? of course they're coming after folks. the fact is, we have the duty to do the work, to get the truth out there, to get the facts out there. that's step one in stopping this kind of baloney from happening in the future. we can't have a justice department that's political. we can't have a justice department that's working hand in hand with the biggest social media platforms to limit what

americans see. you just can't. that's what we have to focus on and do our job. >> hannity: what does it tell you, they had since december, 2019 hunter biden's laptop and did nothing with it. what does that tell you about the fbi and the doj and the investigation you started in january. >> the 14 whistleblowers, the agents who came to talk to us and taken whistleblower status that they're right. you should believe them. they're credible good men and women who talk to them and tell us how crazy things are there. that's why we're going to investigate and get the facts. >> hannity: jim jordan, you're not going to be intimidated. all those years wrestling paid off, no doubt about it. more twitter files dropped today with a big tease from elon musk. we'll check in with ari fleischer and clay travis. why one woke school board is trying to cancel dr. ben carson and what they said i promise you will raise your blood pressure and make you angry straight ahead.

is (

>> sean: we have breaking news out of the bahamas where disgraced ftx founder sam bankman freehed has been arrested after the u.s. attorney's office for the

southern district of new york confirmed that charges in fact have been filed. here with much more, fox news correspondent jonathan hunt. that's probably making a lot of people who lost money happy tonight. >> yeah, sam bankman fried has been poking the bear from the bahamas giving interviews and refusing to testify before the senate unphased by the collapse of his company ftx as well as questions why he or someone with ftx may have done with billions of dollars of investors' money. he may be more concerned tonight now that he is under arrest in the bahamas according to a statement from u.s. attorney damian williams who said, quote, earlier this evening, bahamian authorities arrested samuel bankman freid at the requested of the government filed by the attorney's office for the southern district of new york. we expect to move to unseal the

indictment in the morning and we'll have more to say at that time. now the u.s. is expected to request bankman-freid's expedition from the bahamas. when a formal request is made by the u.s. it will be processed promptly and pursuant to treaty obligations. charges, sean, according to the new york time, include wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering. sean. >> hannity: unbelievable. thank you for that report. another batch of explosive twitter files revealing efforts by twitter's activist employees to ban former president trump. now despite no clear violation of the twitter policy and as reported by journalist, bari weiss who tweeted, quote, after january, twitter employees organized to demand their employer ban trump. there is a lot of employee advocacy happening.

far left leadership became more hell bent on kicking trump off of the platform less than 0 minutes after employees had determined that trump's tweets were not in violation of twitter policy, the head of legal policy and trust asked whether it could, in fact, be coded incitement to further violence. once the ban went into effect effect, internal messages show that staffers at the company, they were ecstatic and could not contain their own giddy-yap excitement. all of that confirms what we've been telling you over and over again that twitter staffers made sensorship decisions not based on rules or policy, based on politics, based onology. -- ideology. it's not just bias, it's an all-out effort to work as an arm of the democratic party as admitted by elon musk and to work in, of course, corrupt actors and federal law enforcement including, sadly, our fbi. now elon musk is teasing more

explosive reveals, including those surrounding dr. doom and gloom and dr. flip-flop fauci. who continues to take zero responsibility for his never ending failures to use the american people. earlier today, white house press secretary karinne sean pierre called the criticism, quote, incredibly dangerous. >> these attacks that we've been seeing are dangerous on dr. fauci and other public health professionals as well. they are disgusting and divorced from reality. and we will continue to call that out and be very clear about that. again, these are dangerous these attacks that we're seeing. >> hannity: here with more on all of this is ari fleischer, and outkick founder clay travis. welcome to the program. ari, let me begin with you, top line takeaway, this is twitter file no. is that twitter employees effectively appointed themselves the election police

ahead of voting in 2020. now, put that together we lon musk's comments if you suppress dissenting voices that's election interference or comments that twitter was acting as the propaganda arm of the democratic party and that the media doesn't want to cover the story because they're complicit in lying to the american public. they gave the biggest in kind contribution one could ever give to any campaign, is that wrong? how do you put a value on it? >> no, sean, i think you nailed it. the problem is cancel culture is real. i wonder if it exists in other outlets, they banned or blocked

email accounts so when they sent email fundraisers, many came back rejected or bounced. a real problem in the social media and main stream media. what i want to know more of now as these things come out is what role did the biden white house play preelon musk in trying to seek influence at twitter to silence or shadow ban their critics, including those who criticized their covid policies. what role did the u.s. government play? because when the government agencies at the white house or the fbi or any other agency asked social media companies to limit speech that is a first amendment issue. what did the biden administration do premusk? >> clay, if you look deeper into this, the fbi agent organizing all of the weekly meetings with big tech is a guy by the name of elvis chan who had a postgraduate thesis claiming

that russia interfered in the 2016 election to help former president trump. now he's organizing weekly meetings with every big tech company. every big tech company went along with what the fbi was recommending because they thought we don't want to be disseminating false information. but the reality is the fbi had the laptop since december, 2019. they had plenty of time to vet that laptop and find out if it's authentic or not. my guess is they did but they didn't want the story being public, knowing that it would likely greatly impact the 2020 election. did the fbi put their thumb on the scale to help joe biden? >> 100%, they did, sean. that's the biggest story here. so far, they haven't gotten anything from the biden administration. we had the biden campaign, we had all of the clear bias that existed inside of twitter, and i think it's important to note this, scene.

when you do this twitter file, you know left wingers in general. they're obsessed with the idea of diversity but not diversity of thought. prong seven of today's revelation, one of the individual at twitter said she was chinese and she was troubled by the idea of censoring leaders. if you read them today. to to their credit, macron in france and angela merkel in germany, they said it was wrong. our government colluded with big tech and big media. is it a coincidence? you know who's not talking about it? abc, nbc, the cbs, "the washington post," "the new york times." they're not covering this.

everything inside of twitter was in addition to big tech, a tri-up verse rant of conclusion, the big tech, big media, the biden administration and campaign all in a rig effect designed to ensure that donald trump was not elected .2020. this is not a surprise at all. they had the laptop. the 51 security officials who allowed their names to be used on a lie, this is all part and parcel of a calamitous campaign here, the biggest issue. this makes watergate seem like jaywalking, sean, to ensure that there was no election of donald trump in 2020. god bless elon musk for spending $44 billion. ari is right about this, sean. if it weren't for that $44 billion. we know it's going on at facebook and instagram and youtube and google and certain tiktok as well. if elon musk hasn't spent that

$44 billion, none of these documents, none of the emails proving the conclusion or the unconstitutional behavior would have come out. that's what he spent this money for to allow us to know what was going on behind the scenes at twitter. >> hannity: we'll give you the last word. i don't see any of them being held accountable, do you? >> no, the accountability has to come from the public. the way to do that is elect republicans everywhere and show these people we are able to go around them. this is the only alternative. if you run a private sector company, you can run it how you want to, you can run it as a partisan enterprise. the democrats have gotten good at running private sector enterprises to benefit their candidates. they are happy to put their thumb on the scale. conservatives and republicans don't like to do that. don't want to do that. but the other thing that democrats have excelled at is cancelling republicans who have the presence of mind to think freely and independently. democrats are much better at the

activism business than republicans are. republicans have to get better at the election business. they have to turn it around. >> hannity: they've got to get better at the ballot business too. democrats don't kiss babies, they don't do media. they don't do much campaigning. they're in the ballot business now. thank you both. very insightful. we turn to a troubling story out of detroit where legendary surgeon and former presidential candidate dr. ben carson had his name removed from a public high school after a resent vote by a far left school board. the school district said in part community members have been expressing concerns regarding how under emergency management the school's name was changed to ben carson emergency management was imposed governance, a structure that did not represent the voices of detroiters or their vote. they added, quote, to the concern regarding how the name

was changed was the fact that many people in detroit felt that dr. ben carson's political positions and decisions as a policy maker did not reflect detroiters and therefore a school should not be named after him. back in 2018, by the way, the school board member leading the charge told "the washington post," quote, it's synonymous as having trump's name on our school in black face. let's be clear. dr. carson is an inspiration to so many, has an outstanding record of accomplishment inside and outside of the hospital he worked in. saved many lives in the course of his career. he should be praised and celebrated, not smeared and slandered. just because he happens to be a republican. and by the way, in a new piece for fox news, 55 individuals that worked for dr. carson wrote, the dr. carson is the epitome of the american dream. only in our country could a poor boy from the inner city grow up

to be a world renown surgeon, presi presidential candidate, and housing secretary. to the far left lunatics, only one thing matters, whether or not you have a d next to your name. dr. ben carson joins me. i think what bothers me most about this, number one, i know you and am friends with you. no. 2, synonymous with having trump's name on our school in black face. dr. carson? nobody should have to put up with that? >> it's very sad that we've reached a point where political ideology trumps the whole purpose of an educational institution. we see this wokeness spreading through the community to the destruction of our community. how does it do any good for us to demonize people with whom we disagree. and to teach that to our children at a time when the math

scores are down, the reading scores are down, academic performance is down. and many of our public schools and high schools, people are graduating from high school are functionally illiterate. they can't fill out an application or the directions in the product that they buy. sometimes they're left in a situation where it's very difficult for them to make a living. we're failing them by pushing this ideology. that's one of the reasons at american cornerstone, we have pushed the little patriots program, teaching children what they should know about the principles of the nation is, what our history is. the good, the bad, the ugly. if you look at it objectively, there's a lot more good than there is bad and ugly. we need to teach that to our children and those principles and littlepatriotslearning.com, a free program because we get people to underwrite it, we want to change this whole narrative

and we need an indocketry nation -- an inoculation to tin docketry nation. that's why we created that program. through the fund, we put in 250 reading rooms throughout the nation where kids come home with few books, go to schools with little budgets for libraries, they don't become readers. if you can become a proficient reader at grade 3, it changes the trajectory of your life. that's what we need to be concerned about. >> hannity: that's the story of your life and mom forcing you to read and not hang out with kids in the street and stay inside and do your work and it changed your life, transformed your life. what your mom did for you will work for any child if given the opportunity. dr. carson, thank you. we appreciate it. more developments tonight out of washington where democrats aree

vupting with predictable hate and rage after arizona senator kyrsten sinema will serve as an independent. alexandria cortez tweeted people deserved more, grateful this race and nomination has now opened up. sinema said this deep party polarization led her to make the move and the decision is putting a spotlight on west virginia senator joe manchin who was asked today if he would become an independent. take a look. >> i'll look at all of these things. i've always looked at these things. i have no intention to do anything right now. will i do something later? i can't tell you what the future is going to bring. i can only tell you where i am in my mindset and what i want to accomplish here in the senate. i want to work with kyrsten the way i have before. >> hannity: here with reaction,

newt gingrich is with us. he has a 70% approval rating when he fights back against build back broke. he goes along with the act. his approval rating is cut in half. he was promised a pipeline they're never going to give to him. and just before the election, the midterms, he's told by joe biden that we're going to eliminate all coal-fired plants and we're going to eliminate all drilling offshore and on shore. now, that directly impacts his state, the state of west virginia, and a big part of its economy. is there any chance you see joe manchin becoming independent. >> maybe, but i think, look, manchin has damaged himself so much that i suspect he'll lose the next senate election in two years. in west virginia. west virginia has shifted more than any other state, both because of economy, and because of culture.

west virginiians are deeply anti-woke. and as a result, i think the more that manchin has tried to appease biden and schumer, the weaker he's become. so, i think he's in a different situation than the -- than sinema is. she's in a place -- she's always been sort of independent. her voting record is not quite as independent as her voice. but she in the end has always been sort of one step away from the democratic party. and i think her gamble is there's a three-way race. in a three-way race, she might attract enough independents and moderates for the democratic party and the republican party to win a three-way race. i'm not sure that's the right calculus. i think part of us just discussed years ago, as you

remember, sean, when you used to be in georgia, the most popular politician in georgia was zell miller. zell came to washington as a good democrat and within two years said to me, the democratic caucus was so sick, he would no longer go -- he wouldn't meet with them anymore. now, he didn't want to leave the democratic party because he had been there his whole life. but he endorsed george w. bush and he refused to meet with the democrats. and i think to some extent,ing both sinema and manchin might find themselves in that situation. the democratic party moves further and further to the left. and for anybody who has an independent sense of thought, it's a very uncomfortable place. >> hannity: let me ask you in the fallout of the midterm election, it turns out democrats have given up the idea of doing interviews, doing debates, kissing babies, taking selfies, doing rallies. instead, all their money, they

outspent republicans in every major race. all their effort and money seems to be going to the ballot game. have republicans made a mistake? are they running an antiquated and outdated election plan? should they be in the ballot game? and that means ballot harvesting where legal, etc.? >> look, i think every republican consultant needs a thorough re-education. fact is republicans focus on campaigns where you buy tv commercials and get a good kickback. democrats focus on elections. they're two totally different models. the republican model no longer works. we shouldn't exaggerate that. the senate is a disaster. but the house -- kevin mccarthy led them to a victory, they're a majority. the governorships, desantis and others had a great year. so i think we're disappointed because people like you and me, frankly, expected a much bigger

result. but the truth is other than the senate, the republicans had a decent year. >> hannity: well said. but republicans have got to overcome the resistance about voting early and voting by mail, for sure. newt gingrich, thank you. when we come back, the left are fawning over the trust fund brat? in a hoody. you won't believe what tom brady did. he was pissed off at yesterday's loss. straight ahead. s, lincoln's witnessed a good bit of history. even made some themselves. makes you wonder... what will they do for an encore? ♪

vehicles come in all different sizes. yet ordinary windshield phone holders

are one size fits all. does that make sense? no. but this does. the adjustable windshieldfone from weathertech. it extends and retracts for a perfect fit in any vehicle. plus, a quick release tab for easy one handed in and out. and for kids, use it in the back seat too. comes with short, medium and telescopic arms, to fit any vehicle. order the american made windshieldfone at weathertech.com. even makes a nice holiday gift. - [narrator] every day, our lives are filled with choices, both simple and life-changing. what's not a choice? addiction to opioids like fentanyl. but even with opioid use disorder, you still have a choice. by choosing treatment, you choose family, your career and your life on your terms. choose change, california,

and find medically proven treatment options at choosechangeca.org. i was injured in a car crash. and find medically proven treatment options i had no idea how much my case was worth. at choosechangeca.org. i called the barnes firm. when a truck hit my son, i had so many questions about his case. i called the barnes firm. it was the best call i could've made. your case is often worth more than insuran call the barnes firm to find out i could've made. what your case could be worth. we will help get you the best result possible. ♪ the barnes firm, injury attorneys ♪ call one eight hundred,est resul eight million ♪

>> hannity: "the new york times" is finding more creative ways to embarrass themselves tonight by naming socialist trust fund brat in a hoody john fetterman on the list of stylish people. take a look at it. that's real style. meanwhile, joe biden was in a holiday spirit in abevent in in virginia where he got to play with new toys and a bike. he didn't fall off of the bicycle. that's progress. he did need to be helped off of the stage by one of the kids. after shifting gears to the nfl by the way, we'll get to that in a second, but look at joe, he has to get reminded. see, you have to go this way, joe. yeah, go that way. okay. at least the poor girl didn't

have to get her hair smelled like so many others. tom brady reportedly erupted after a blowout loss in san francisco saying he skipped the shower after the game. when asked, he told local media, quote, some things i don't give a blank about. and at this point, f-that, i'm going home. joining us, he's the host of fox across america, jimmy is with us. i like tom brady. and i like the fact that he doesn't like to lose. i understand it. they have not had a good year in tampa bay. he's had a lot of his private life brought into the public eye. that's got to suck. >> in his defense, sean sean, half of the people in san francisco don't shower they live in tents. not like he's going to stick out walking down the street. i think the city of san

francisco got to him. we have to make sure he didn't go potty on the sidewalk after he left the stadium. i'm worried about brady. >> hannity: you know, i watched the girl escort and point joe off of the stage. he has a problem with that. he'll turn and shake air. there's no real person that he turns to. the girl, very -- i got to give her a lot of credit, directs the where to go. and i felt lucky for her. because he has this habit of sniffing young people's hair. i was thankful he didn't do it to this kid. >> oh, gosh, maybe he's got covid again and he lost his sense of smell. i don't know what to think. but isn't it crazy, sean, that joe biden is the only in history that takes more time to exit a speech than he does to give one un? like hello, man? it's not supposed to work that way.

do you think he'll run again? >> stop it, there's no chance. >> hannity: you don't think so. >> no, no, hunter has a better chance -- well, i don't have hannity money. so i will bet you like, i don't know, i'll bet you whatever -- let me jump in here. >> hannity: five-to-one, you name the price. >> hunter has a better chance. my budget, all right. we'll say $500 american, is that fair? >> hannity: $500 hannity, $100 to you. finish the last thought. >> all right, i was going to say there's no way. hunter has a better chance of running the dea than biden has to run the country in 2024. payout, i will let you buy me out now for half. >> hannity: you got it, the bet is on. more hannity after this.

we have left this evening. as always, thank you for being with us. thank you for making this possible. set your dvr so you never miss an episode for hannity. in the mean, let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham, it's a great show. it's a rumor, i hope it's true. it usually is true. >> laura: what do you think hunter biden wants for christmas? i mean, what do you think? what do you -- what do you give the man who has everything, sean, or had everything? >> hannity: maybe the gun and the dumpster back, i don't know. >> laura: i was going to say, it could involve a dumpster. but he's getting $300k for the blow through the straw drawings, right? the guy is flush with cash. >> hannity: what is he going to do now that he's not going to make all of this money? what's he going to do?