possible. please set your dvr so you never ever ever miss an episode of "hannity." for news all the time, any time, all the time, foxnews.com. hannity.com. in the meantime, let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham, "the ingraham angle" is up next. see you tomorrow night. >> laura: i'm laura ingraham and this is "the ingraham angle" from washington tonight. america overrun. that's the focus of tonight's angle. for the past two years, while the regime media has been obsessed with all things trump, january 6, of course the drag queen shows. america was being invaded by millions along our southern border. for a sense of how the regime media are covering this,

unparalleled border surge, look no further than this headline from axios. biden braces for potentially 14,000 migrants a day. well, instead of braces for, it should read roots for. they came from dozens of countries >> laura: migrants to go through them for safe passage. not only did the biden administration not repel the invasion, it encouraged it. this was a purposeful, willful, wanton, intentional effort to overwhelm our border control and flood our beautiful country with millions of illegals. 95% or more have no legitimate asylum claims but they do have scripts that they memorized.

mouthing just enough of the right words to allow them to be immediately released and bust to wherever they want to go. every once in a while, they let the truth slip out. >> would you have tried to do this when donald trump was president? >> definitely not. a speaker we have a chance. >> did you come there because joe biden was elected president? >> basically. >> laura: the refusal of the biden administration to use his authority to stop this invasion is the most egregious abuse of power any of us have seen in our lifetimes. biden held onto his emergency covert authority. until the spring of 2023 at least, probably continuing after that. apparently that emergency isn't bad enough to keep title 42 in place which allows for immediate border turn backs during a health crisis. matt expires next week. the only conclusion any of us can draw is that the democrats

want a different america. they can't rely on elections to the steadily advances towards a global government and zero carbon output so they need new voters, voters who are ignorant of the american tradition and whose children will not be taught about it in our public schools. it doesn't matter who these new people are and what their intentions are, whether they'll be drains on our schools, our health care system, whether they are criminals. as long as they are not you whom the left hates intensely. the biden folks are so brazen the year or response to the border catastrophe is to make the trek easier the migrants. why allow them to walk when we can fly them into the united states? the biden administration is considering expanding, not shrinking asylum categories to include cubans, haitians, and nicaraguans. they will allow them to be flown into the country after merely applying for asylum abroad.

the doddering biden has never been to the border, we have known that. a total dereliction of duty. it's a health, economic, and national security crisis that's unfolding right at this moment. whatever happens to americans because of this, they think it's just necessary collateral damage. you are not their priority. families are suffering, american families like this. >> my son was standing on the driveway when this gang member came from behind and was going to shoot his friend in the back and got my son in the arm and he literally bled to death. he died in surgery. >> our kids have been dead for years and years and we can even get them to say anything nice about it, they ignore us. >> laura: the incalculable damage biden has done to america at the border alone, one thing is certain. they'll only take course if they believe it's going to hurt them politically. that's why it's so critical for republicans to stay 100% unify

here on this side of law and order, controlling our borders. schumer and biden would love to say that they have struck some kind of deal with someone like i don't know thom tillis of north carolina or susan collins from maine on the immigration issue. and then they like to rope house republicans in so they can hold a big bipartisan signing ceremony at the white house, just like they did with their so-called marriage act yesterday. but california governor gavin newsom of all people with his own white house ambitions, i think he sees political trouble had for the democrats. >> get an understanding of what the world looks like pretitle 42 and what it likely is going to look like in a few weeks. >> laura: and then he told an abc affiliate "the fact is we have now is not working. it's about to break. i say this not to point fingers,

he said, but as a father and someone who feels responsible for the solution. millions of american patriots over at most 250 years have sacrificed so that we would remain a free and independent nation. one only control our own destiny, one where government represent what's best in our interest, for us. but now for almost two years we had a government whose main goal is to get you used to a lower standard of living at a new normal. yeah, that new normal requires you to suspend your own dreams and beliefs for a nightmare that will never end. it's going to be up to us to awaken those were still asleep out there and mobilize for the next election against anyone of any party who facilitated this invasion. that's the angle. joining me now is missouri senator josh hawley, member of the senate judiciary committee. senator, your reaction with all

of this unfolding at the border and it is a heartbreak to see, what's happening to our people, how the kids are suffering, how the crime is going about some of your republican colleagues like thom tillis and others are now looking to strike a deal with the democrats over so-called immigration reform and respond to this. your reaction. >> i'm certainly not going to support that. the truth is we shouldn't have to trade anything to get the enforcement of our laws at our own southern border. the biden administration is getting exactly what they want at the southern border. this 14,000 a day illegal search, they have known about this, they have known this would happen. they don't want to border. they don't want there to be customs and border patrol, they don't want her to be i.c.e., they don't want immigration enforcement. this is their plan and they are executing it. >> laura: when you think about single acts of government abuse that have had severe ramifications for the country,

right, the democrat's event talking about henry six. that's all they've got. for the last two years almost, january 6. but this will have profound effects on perhaps hour, first of all our electoral process. if these people ever get legal rights to vote, our schools, our public health system. everything, are housing. unless fox covers it, there are very few media outlets and action going to tell the truth about with happening. period. >> yeah, and what else is new on that what you're exactly right. and the criminal justice system. let's not forget, we are talking about hundreds of thousands. millions of people coming across the border in the space of one year and what this really says is the democrats are willing to turn over our sovereign southern border to the biggest human trafficking operation in the world, those would be the border cartels. they are willing to let them have it. you're concerned about kids. democrats want to give the

cartels who are smuggling children control of the border. you're concerned about crime. the democrats want to give the cartels control of the border. as a guy who represents the state of missouri, we are awash in drugs with fentanyl, methamphetamine in our state. it's not coming from inside missouri. it's coming across the board. that's all courtesy of joe biden. i tell you what. it's time to hold this guy accountable. it's time for the house of representatives to do their job and to impeach mayorkas. >> laura: there is a difficult effort underway at the white house to try to shift blame for the title 42 issue which would allow for immediate turn back to the border. that goes away next week. listen to the white house press secretary on that issue. >> next week title 42. how is the admin's ration preparing for that? >> we put the question to congress. what are they going to do here? we are also wanting to do this on a bipartisan way. republicans know how to work

with us so why don't they work with us on this particular issue that is important to americans across the country. >> laura: senator, that speaks exactly to what i talked about in "the angle." >> we ought to pass title 42, extended by statute, make it the law, i'd be happy to do that. republicans of repose to do that over and over again, democrats have blocked it. if that's what the white house is saying, that they welcome congress' action, great. this may title 42 permanent let's do it with the force of law. i'm 100% delighted to do that. i look forward to seeing the democrats lined up for that. >> laura: yeah, you've got to hold your breath on that. they want mass amnesty with no enforcement. great to see you. looking forward to 2024, we see the globalist scrambling to influence the likely g.o.p. field on the issue of trade. for the worse that's going to happen we see the battle lines

forming on that old dead horse known as the trans-pacific partnership to remember that nightmare? it was so bad, by the way, that deal that america found even hillary clinton had to walk away from it during the 2016 campaign. trump when he was elected smartly withdrew us from it. but now the freddy krueger of trade deals is back with some tweaks, they say. we can reimagine it, they argue, somehow the u.s. will not and up with the same raw deal. a return would provide an immediate boost to u.s. competitiveness and geopolitical influence. of course that's just more mumbo-jumbo. just watch. some conservatives, certain g.o.p. senators, and some right-leaning think tanks will insist that this is the only way we can get really tough on china. to renegotiate the tpp. if someone like a ron desantis announces he's running for president he meets with the top

newspaper editors, they will almost certainly pressure him to say something hopeful about this tpp issue. but it's all another trap for republicans. everyone in the business community who supports that deal plans to use it to ship more jobs overseas. on this topic, henry olson made an excellent point this week. the old consensus hollowed large stretches of u.s. economy impoverishing communities and it also financed china's rise, imperiling our national security. consumers might enjoy cheaper goods but the country as a whole has paid high prices for these transient benefits. the craziness of the world trade organization and the ongoing aggression from china, they are steadily undermining support for globalization. that's already happening. biden's team, they know this which is why they are keeping the tariffs right now from trump in place. and occasionally blasting the

wto. i'm sure the biden people are hoping that the g.o.p. will abandon trump's trade policy and go back to the old bush-cheney perspective. that would open the door for scranton joe to scoop up the working class folks in ohio and pennsylvania and practically guarantee his reelection. here's the bottom line. if desantis, someone like him, runs for president, anyone also helps hopes to went over working-class voters, they are headed into a minefield on trade. they should be aware of getting roped into alliance with folks like mcconnell and the retiring pat toomey. the china chamber of commerce on issues that are going to come back to hump them, stay away from them as well. you want to campaign in middle america, you better stand for middle america. joining me as bob lighthizer, former trump trade representative. great to see you. what's the biggest problem with

this reimagined tpp? >> let me say first of all, to your other point, the broader point. the republican party as the party of working people, period right now. big business is with the democrats. tech is with the democrats. the question that you save yourself, what can we do for working-class people that will create more jobs and raise wages for these people. you've got three things that a sensible republican can do. one, cut taxes. that will help jobs. cut taxes on business. not necessarily on individuals. working class people don't see that is in their interest. you can cut regulations which is also sensible and helpful. working class people don't see that is in their interest either. and then you can do something on trade. you can fight for our jobs. you can fight for a balanced trade, fight for fair trade. working-class people see the benefit of that so to run for president as a republican and not embrace this new america first approach on trade is in my

judgment suicide. you will lose ohio where i am front and you will lose pennsylvania and a lot of these other places. if we become the party of the u.s. chamber of commerce and big business in this field, it's a mistake. secondly on your question of the tpp, the tpp was a disaster from the beginning. it was never ever going to increase exports. it was also talk always about imports. the notion that it's somehow encircling china is crazy notion. the reality is the way that thing was written, the way it was written, you could increase shipments, parts of products could come from china in the united states, get duty-free treatment that they can't get now. we really -- it was the biggest single gift to china. it was a crazy notion. i asked people specifically, tell me what you think we are going to expert as a -- export

as a result of this agreement. nobody can give me anything of any consequence. the principal benefit. when they first sold, the principal benefit was agricultural sales to japan. we got those in the trump administration in the u.s.-japan deal. we got all benefit you can get out of it. now it's just going to hurt us and it can't be fixed. it literally is like putting lipstick on a pig. it cannot be fixed. >> laura: bob, this issue of steel tariffs, the wto not surprisingly, the world trade organization, has ruled against american steel tariffs that were put in place by the trump administration saying their unfairly protectionist and they put other countries at a disadvantage. bob, with everything that you've done in your entire career on trade. bob is the most brilliant person on trade frankly in the united states. on the issue steel, what has happened to our steel industry and the great globalization.

>> well, the reality is the steel industry in the united states has been decimated. period of decades but it's been around the world too. there is more excess capacity in steel, noneconomic excess capacity and steel in china than there is production in places like the united states, europe, japan. so we need those tariffs. the wto case was outrageous but not surprising. we made a clear decision that every country makes its own decision on national security. this is not something where you have these three wise men and they are not the wise men that found christmas by the way, these are not wise men who didn't find christmas. so the notion that you have an arbitration, three people, three bureaucrats in brussels, deciding what's in america's national interest is completely ridiculous. >> laura: bob, it's great to see you. it's been quite a while. thank you so much.

as we see our global influence wayne and our borders overrun, you might not realized that we are on track to send more than $100 billion in total to ukraine. is the public losing patience with all of this, plus the most dangerous plastic surgery in the world has really taken off as a procedure of choice in the united states. what is it and what do you need to know about it? that's next.

>> are we sending troops to ukraine? no. we are sending material. >> laura: the white house tries to claim that defense assistance has only total $20 billion in thorn ukraine began, the number from three separate packages already enacted totals $68 billion. as for what biden wants to tack on, as he mentioned the other day, another 30 billion, bringing the total to well over $100 billion. biden's comments also came on the same day that zelenskyy requested at least 815 million from allies to support the country as the breeze for a cold winter. now, never mind that americans in the upper midwest and

northeast are struggling from the crush of limited energy supplies and sky-high prices, zelenskyy and the rest of his cabinet are relentless. they have been selling this war is that battle for civilization itself. and they used historical language to get what they want. >> it's important not only for ukraine. it's important for europe. it's important for civilized world. >> defense minister tells cnn ukraine urgently needs more weapons from the u.s. and nato. >> are you getting the weapons that you need? you know when you have a war, you will not have enough. certainly more, especially at air defense systems is priority number one for us. >> laura: they ask and of course we oblige. it was announced the u.s. plans to send patriot missile defense systems to ukraine to bolster their defenses and their borders. what a novel concept. defending borders. why would we need to do that? don't do it here after all.

perhaps we could spend some of those billions, i don't know, to fortify our own or actually do something about the millions who are crossing, as drug cartels and human traffickers the united states are flourishing. it's huge growth industry. both of them. what have we gotten for all of this? the russians have been repelled for now and we are thankful for that but how are we measuring accomplishments at this point? the ukrainian foreign ministry admitted that russia's capability to launch a large offensive may be restored by the end of january or february. so can we expect this to go on in perpetuity? with these proxy efforts ever bringing stability to the region? no. how much patience does america actually have left? after months of successful propaganda by zelenskyy, the american media, and the biden administration, americans are now very closely divided on

whether washington should support ukraine for "as long as it takes." that number now stands at 48%. down from 58% in july. while 47% say washington should urge ukraine to settle for peace as soon as possible, that's up from 38% in july. are the war hawks in washington and both parties, are they listening? you they care? here is chris bedford, executive editor of the common sense society. chris, we cave to every demand of zelenskyy's and as we know, the omnibus spending bill that chuck schumer and mitch mcconnell are so desperate to get past, that does include the 38 billion biden wants. >> they will send all the money they can to ukraine. the american people can be pulled any which way they want but they've never been consulted on this and i don't expect they will be. the folks being consulted on the war are left-wing activists obsessed with russia. the state department which

generally does the business of other countries before the united states, in this case, ukraine. department of defense fresh off two quagmires that lasted the entirety of my adult life, iraq and afghanistan. now they are getting into another one without any end game, any goals, and accountability, any goals for what constitutes victory except for maybe replacing putin. seems like a dangerous idea and at the same time we are depleting our money, resources, ignoring the border, china, and actual military threat, actual existential threat to the united states, biding its time and enjoying it. >> laura: how much have they gotten involved with any wars? >> china keeps its nose out. hard power and soft power to expand across africa. >> laura: not firing a single shot at least not in foreign countries, not yet. >> they let their friends like that in their putin who we saw a glowing hat in hand to see president xi in china, they let their friends to their fighting,

like smart countries often do. the united states won the cold war. a lot of the ways they want, able to realize this is no longer the cold war, it's no longer a godless, atheist slave slave state trying to conquer the planet. how close are we going to get to nuclear war? >> laura: congressman maccoll, incoming house foreign affairs commissioner made a comment about the cost about the war. >> i support ukraine. with the amount of investment we've had, to very small relative to destroying the russian military. that's we've done. without one american soldier being attacked, killed, or in country. to me that's a pretty good investment. >> laura: what have we gotten? i'm still asking, what have we actually accomplished in this hundred billion dollars which we will have spent by the end of this year? >> we have destabilized vladimir putin and we have shown his army to be the hollow army that it has been for decades and

decades. the question is to what end? just like when wu ended and qaddafi or saddam hussein. do they want something to to take over from pollutant? today think activists will take over for vladimir putin? if he falls because his army is hollowed out and republicans get their way, he's going to fall for someone who's more hard-line, more against our interests, potentially close to china and that's a serious threat. >> laura: we also have to remember xi and putin have a new alliance because of our proxy war in ukraine. we have no knowledge we have driven up the price of oil globally by continuing to fund this war. that's a fact. sanctions have made the oil companies even richer here in the united states and around the world. putin is not suffering. china is buying all the oil from them.

>> england is suffering. germany is suffering for europe is suffering. have to ask because obviously no one wants to see the atrocities that are going on in ukraine. what serves the just interests of the united states? it might be just to stop atrocities but is it serve american interests? destabilizing pollutant, taking rif china doesn't serve our interests. >> laura: is ukraine our ally? >> ukraine is certainly our ally when we are paying for them. i wouldn't expect them to come to the aid of the united states of anywhere we have to fight. >> laura: this l looks like it's going away in public opinion like you did with iraq. no clear benefit to the united states. great to see you. what did dr. jill give joe biden during a public event? raymond arroyo has a new special. he will reveal it all next.

[sfx: cards shuffling] this holiday, weathertech gift cards are perfect for people

to pick exactly what they want. laser measured floorliners that fit your vehicle precisely. keep your seats safe from messes with the child car seat protector. sinkmat protects under your sink. there's even something for our furry friends with the pet feeding system. order the weathertech gift card instantly for the holidays at weathertech.com ♪ ♪

>> laura: it's time for "seen and unseen." we reveal the story behind the headlines. return to raymond arroyo, the author of "the wise men who found christmas." did you see biden's so-called marriage signing, what was that? >> it was a bill the other day. thousands on the south lawn. especially one revealing moment. the president said he had to sign this bill to protect gay marriage. wasn't gay marriage already legal? he'll be signing a bill for public prayer and the selling of giza dream sheets. i think that's already legal. right before the signing, did you catch the moment when dr dr. jill handed joe a little pick-me-up. watch this moment. he pops it in his mouth.

what is that? is it a midday snack? meds, amphetamines, what is it? >> laura: it might be a cough drop. as someone who has suffered from coughing fits on the air. i have had my famous one. maybe it was just a cough drop. >> apparently the nursing duties never end. i am waiting for her to give him therapy in public. and an enema. here he was today. >> two great champions. building tyson business, investment. help save lives in combat covid-19. [indistinct]

>> public moments like that are the recent "politico" is reporting "the president has vented allies about how often his ages mentioned in in the press." he knows how vulnerable he is political week. with this "newsweek" poll showing nearly 60% of voters don't want him to run again, joe better keep the nursing unit behind close doors. >> laura: i wonder if it was an edible. theythey are all for legalizing. there's two of the people i would like to see stay behind close doors. more of their self serving dock drops tomorrow. >> institutional gaslighting. >> i wasn't being thrown to the wolves. i was being fed to the wolves. >> actively recruiting people to disseminate information.

>> happy to lie to protect my brother. never willing to tell the truth to protect us. >> goodness gracious. this is the most-watched documentary on netflix. after trashing the family, what do they do next? how to raise chickens in montecito? lifestyles of the bitchy and the fractious? >> laura: the best was "i wasn't thrown to the wolves. i was fed to the wolves." as the woman not know that the saying is it's implicit in the saying that you are feeding similar to the wolves? she doesn't even understand that basic english construction. poor thing. that's like a eighth-grade deal. before we go, i understand the little bird he is telling me you have a new fox nation special and it's titled, this is interesting, "the wise men who

found christmas." we've never heard that phrase before. >> it's a companion documentary that delves into the real history and scholarship surrounding the origins of the wise men and their part in the christmas story. they are among the most beloved characters of christmas. but what we really know of the mysterious magi? where do they come from? who were they? what did they see in the sky that drew them to the christ child? what about those gifts that they bore. gold and frankincense and myrrh. what do those tell us about their origins. i'm raymond arroyo and during this fox nation special, we will explore the history as well as the new archaeological evidence that tells us just who these wise men who found christmas might be. >> laura, we have answers aplenty. the wise men who found christmas now on fox nation, historians,

theologians, astronomers had me on horseback, it might be the greatest christmas special ever. >> laura: move over, andy williams. i have a question. i have a question. nice hat. number two, how many times in your life have you ridden a horse in a field of dried flowers? >> you would be surprised. i sit high on the saddle. i like horses. i rarely get on them now. i am moving into the other side of life. >> laura: like you grew up in montana? what do you mean, i rarely get on them now? what are you talking about? this is like an old radio show. >> when i was in the berkshires years ago i would ride a horse in most every day. i do enjoy them and i have friends who have them as well. occasionally i will get on horseback. but it's rare these days. what are you going to do?

i am auditioning for yellowstone, my next career. >> laura: sam is telling me after ride that horse to the tease. great to see you. incredible special. looking forward to watching it. raymond is going to be in new jersey at books and greetings at 6:00 p.m. that's his final book signing. doctors are warning the most dangerous plastic surgery in the world is really taking off as a procedure in the united states. up next, meet a patient on the wrong side of it, or the backside of it, next.

>> laura: what happens when they diversity mobs take over our nation's med schools? how are we going to know who is truly qualified and who isn't to practice medicine? is this a matter of life and death? it sounds like it to me. two medical students are proposing to make what is known as the mcat, the medical college admission test, a pass-fail exam in order to remove barriers for disadvantaged minority applicants. here now is dr. ben carson, former hud secretary and retired neurosurgeon. dr. carson, you grew up in poverty. single mom. yet somehow you managed to

become a world-renowned neurosurgeon. is the mcat as an objective measure important, or is it racist, as these students are implying? >> we live in a society where everything is racist these days. the weights interpreted. but the fact of the matter is, i spent many years on the medical school admissions committee at johns hopkins and it's a multifactorial process. you look at the grades, their backgrounds, you look for extra dimensions, you look at their scores. there's a whole host of things that you look at and then if there are questions, you make sure you include those questions in the interview process. as a result of that kind of wide spectrum approach, we had plenty of diversity in the medical school classes. it was not an issue at all. people need to stop looking for an easy way out. it's not an easy thing. if you're going to be a

physician, you need to be flexible. you need to be smart. you need to be quick. we don't need to be finding excuses for people. >> laura: well, they are doing the same thing, dr. carson, to the law schools. as another effort underway, and the "l.a. times" i believe had a piece about this saying that the legal profession lacks diversity in the lsat makes matters worse. so again, every standard of objective measure is looked at through this diversity and equity lens and thus since it's difficult, as these tests are, they require real work, they have to be jettisoned. essentially jettisoned. >> you have to recognize that our society over the last -- over my lifetime, has changed enormously. in a positive way. when i was a kid and a black person came on television and they were not in a servile role,

it was a big deal. you called everybody and to watch. now in the same lifetime value of black admirals and generals and ceos of fortune 500 companies and heads of foundations and university presidents, including ivy league spirit reelected president, vice president. to say things are changing in a better way is absurd -- aren't changing at a better way is absurd. let's face what we do on our successes, not someone's perceived failures. >> laura: dr. carson, i know there is a detroit school taking your name off a building, public school, after your storied career in medicine because of politics. i don't want to give it any play but it's predictable. but i know it's just water off your back and we really appreciate you. thank you so much. speaking of medicine, doctors here are issuing a dire warning about a growing plastic surgery trend. they are called brazilian butt

lifts largely made famous by celebrities and postings on social media. this surgery basically takes excess fat from other parts of your body and then injects it and shapes it into your backside. now, of course, it's a pretty big surgery. there could be a lot of complications, especially when women get, and i'm not kidding you, it's called back alley injections, instead of the real thing, like rapper cardi b got to. she said she went to a woman's basement apartment that for $800 was injected with filler. she gave an update on her condition a few days ago. >> in august i did surgery and i removed 95%, 95%. it was a really crazy process. do not, whatever you do, don't

get [bleep] don't get shots. >> laura: she said someone allegedly died. joining us, she received silicone butt injections in his warning against the dangerous procedure. everything was fine until six months after your surgery? what happened? >> yeah, so six months into it, i got a rash. just on my butt so i knew it was the injections. >> laura: so you started hurting and i guess the question is, is this just now -- is another example of people trying to do too much to make themselves look perfect? you're obviously a very attractive person. you look like you're in great shape, et cetera. why did you decide you needed to

do this procedure? why did you go the silicone root? >> yeah, so i was very, very, very skinny. i didn't have any fat to transfer. these injections. i was told it was not silicone. i was told it was filler and it would dissolve in a couple years and it was really the only option for skinny people such as myself. you can see my before and after and how tiny my butt was despite how often die exercised ended squats. i was also a ballerina for 11 years but i just was so tiny. it's an epidemic. we can thank the kardashians for this. everybody wants to have a bigger butt. i was living in miami at the time. >> laura: do you regret having done it? would your -- you recommend that anyone went down this path again? i know you went to columbia to

get it fixed. >> i don't recommend it. it's detrimental to your life and it's one of the hardest surgeries. my surgery was seven hours to remove them and i still have quite a bit of product in me. i'm going to have to go through it again at some point. it's literally risking your life. it's not worth it. there's a reason that is not done by plastic surgeons. it's very dangerous. i just didn't know that at the time obviously. >> laura: i think everyone is on social media and everyone looks perfect and everyone wants to look better. you're not the first one and you're not going to be the last one that gets caught up in the spirit i really appreciate your speaking out on this. thank you so much. we wish you all the best. coming up, dogs get excited about christmas as well. the last bite. or is the dog biting us? we'll show you. of up to $26,000 per employee. all it takes is eight minutes to get started. then work with professionals to assist your business

with its forms and submit the application. go to getrefunds.com to learn more.

i'm not a doctor. i'm not even in a doctor's office. i'm standing on the streets talking to real people about their heart. how's your heart? my heart's pretty good. you sure? -i think so. how do you know? you're driving a car, you have the check engine light, but the heart doesn't have a "hey, check heart" sign. i want to show you something. put both fingers right on those pads. there you go. in 30 seconds, we're going to have a medical-grade ekg.

there it is. that is you. look at that. with kardiamobile, the fda cleared personal ekg device, you can take a medical-grade ekg in just 30 seconds from anywhere. kardiomobile is proven to detect atrial fibrillation, one of the leading causes of stroke. and it's the only personal ekg that can also detect normal heart rhythm, bradycardia and tachycardia. how much do you think this device costs? probably $1,000. $99! -wow. that's impressive. for a limited time only, kardiamobile is just $79. don't wait. order today on amazon or kardiamobile.com ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> oh, my god, is that such a cute dog? i can't take it that dog is too cute that's it for us tonight. don't forget to set your dvr seo a stay connected, to give for watching and remember it's america now and forever here it is. greg gutfeld and again and take it all from. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> greg: all right, here we go. [cheers and applause] yes, crazy people. you are crazy, all of you what you doing here? happy wednesday yes, it's been a minute since we last talked about the commander who grabs his khakis. so let's do it