carmela harris, ladies and gentlemen. our vice president. we'd love to see more time getting to the etimology of kamala, carmela. have the best night with the ones you love. see you tomorrow. >> sean: welcome in. john kerry is traveling around the world this time at the anti-world economic forum in europe. we'll have details. by the way, after getting canned at fake news cnn, humpty dumpty is there attempting to put the pieces of his life back together again as he is at the wef hosting a wth disinformation seminar. after all, he's an expert.

here at home, one democratic lawmaker introduced legislation to criminalize freedom of speech. what part of the constitution does that congress woman not understand? stay tuned for tonight's hannity hot seat featuring democratic richard fowler. we begin with a fox news alert. a bombshell new report from the wall street journal has now exposed a blatant dual system of justice at joe biden's department of justice. tonight we are learning that the justice department rejected a federal search for top secret classified documents housed at joe biden's many properties. they called off the fbi. no raid for joey. joe biden gets different treatment than trump. instead, they outsourced the search to biden's own private attorneys and biden staffers, including many without any security clearance at all whatsoever. now, in the case of the private attorney, well, they can now be witnessing in a criminal investigation. according to jonathan turley,

quote, the use of private counsel without clearances following the first discovery could itself be viewed as reckless and gross mishandling. but at this point, biden's doj doesn't really seem to care because, quote, mr. biden's attorneys had quickly turned over a first batch. they were cooperating. right. they quickly turned over a first batch. six years after the documents were taken from their rightful home. of course, the same leniency was never in the cards for donald trump. remember, the former president was cooperating with federal officials inquiring about documents potentially at mar a-lago. he invited them to his home. he allowed unfettered access to the documents. fbi agents actually were free and clear and went in the room where the documents eventually were found, and they never asked for them, even though they were there. trump then secured the documents with a padlock in that room at their request. and yet in the early morning

hours of august 8th, a tactical team from the fbi raid mar a-lago, guns drawn as they searched for closets. they took whatever they wanted by force. that would include the president's passport. by the way, the attorney general, merritt garland, the fbi director wray, bragged about signing off on this raid. they were unwilling to do the same for joe biden. why didn't they tell us when they knew six days before the midterm elections? apparently they want you and all of us to just trust that joe biden and his attorneys and his aides are going to do the right thing. but joe biden almost never does the right thing. he is a notorious liar with very few principles or morals. he won't even acknowledge his own 4-year-old grand daughter or grant her secret service protection. we're supposed to take his word for it in this document investigation? now remember, it is now well

established that joe biden, as vice president, met with at least 14 of hunter biden's sketchy foreign business partners. he then flat out lied repeatedly about those meetings, denied any knowledge of ever even speaking to his son about his foreign business ventures. now, of course, joe biden was the center piece of those interests, as hunter admitted in an interview on abc. take a look. >> in the list you gave me of the reasons why you're on there, you did not list the fact that you were the son of the vice president. >> of course, no. >> what role do you think that played? >> i think it is impossible for me to be on any of the boards i mentioned without saying i'm the son of the vice president of the united states. >> if your name wasn't biden, do you think you would have asked to be on the board? >> i don't know. i don't know. probably not. i don't think there's a lot of things that would have happened in my life that if my last name wasn't biden. >> sean: he admitted he had no experience at oil or gas or energy or ukraine or the energy sector at all or sophisticated

investing. absolutely no experience. zero experience. hunter was selling access to his dad. that's called influence peddling. it has a real name. in 2017 when hunter was still raking in money from many of these sketchy foreign business partners, a document obtained by miranda divine and the daily caller shows joe biden was purportedly collecting $50,000 in rent per month at his delaware home from his own son. why? now, it's not palm beach and it's not malibu, california. this is true and hunter was actually paying pops 50 grand a month to rent a room in delaware, then i think we all know how the big guy was taking his cut. get this. according to a report from john solomon, hunter and at least one of his business associates, they discussed joe biden's earnings potential and wealth creation in an e-mail chain titled jrb future. jr be, -- the plans heavily

involved the communist party of china. not only did china contribute tens and tens of millions of dollars to the university of pennsylvania after the establishment of the biden center, $67 million in total for the university, $47.7 million once joe biden was out of office. but hunter also scored a lucrative deal with a chinese energy firm, and that included that $5 million interest-free forgivable loan. this was in addition to the $100,000 shopping spree with a chinese national. by the way, we can't forget the multibillion dollar sweetheart deal with the bank of china, no explanation why they didn't go to goldman sachs, jp morgan, deutsche bank or maybe a real firm. so, yeah, top secret documents lying around at the u penn center and in joe's garage and in his library and in his other house. that's deeply concerning.

but according to many in the mob, the media and democrats, no big deal at all. we just have to trust joe biden. they only have one true boogie man in all of this and his name when all else fails and the dog bites and the bee stinks and you're feeling sad, you got to blame donald trump. take a look. >> the intelligence community needs to do its risk and damage assessment about how donald trump started reckless handling of these documents might have harmed our national security. >> they find the documents, they reported them immediately. anybody who says it's a different situation is a political hack. >> if the trump people represented that they provided all the classified or national security information and didn't, that's a serious problem. as far as we can tell it was inadvertent that these documents were in these locations. when they were discovered they were immediately provided to the archives or the justice department. there was no effort to hold on to them, no effort to conceal them. >> this was not a mistake that these documents landed at mar

a-lago. this is what he intended. it shows they want to get these documents back and every second they are at the beach house in the possession of don'ted a trump, that is a risk to our national security. >> he should have said, look, i know i look hypocritical in that tape. i'm sorry about that. >> sean: all those people are all political hacks. luckily, we have an honest press secretary with a very solid grasp of the facts who's committed to transparency. only kidding. over the last two weeks, she has sadly embarrassed herself over and over as she has attempted again and again to stonewall the press and has told them, let's just call them untruths to the american people. take a look. >> what i can tell you right now is what the president -- share with you what the president said to all of you, right, which is he was surprised by this. he definitely truly respects the

process here. and also when it comes to classified, he takes classified documents very seriously. that search was completed last night and now this is in the hands of the justice department. it has been completed, yes. when they completed the search with documents being found last night. i have answered your questions almost every day on this issue. again, anything else that you may have, anything that's related to the review, i would refer to the department of justice. you've asked me this 100 times, 200 times, if you wish. i'm going to keep saying the same thing. >> are you upset that you came up to this podium friday with incomplete and inaccurate information? and are you concerned that it affects your credibility up here? >> what i'm concerned about is making sure that we do not politically interfere in the department of justice. that we continue to be consistent over the last two years. that is continue to refer you

all when it comes to on going process, and i'll just leave it there. >> sean: so obviously we're not going to hear the truth from the biden administration in any way. that's why investigations in the house are critically important. with the very latest on those investigations, house oversight committee chairman james comer. let's start with what we now know. it's not one location. it's now four locations. your reaction? >> well, this just shows how irresponsible the president is. it shows that they haven't been truthful. the only reason we know about these documents is because of investigative reporting at cbs. someone leaked to cbs that joe biden had these documents. that in itself should be part of the investigation because we don't know who had access to these documents. for the democrats to go on national television and say, well the president did the right thing. he immediately turned them over november 2nd. why did we not find out about it

until 60 plus days later? and then we only found out about it because of an investigative report. it wasn't because they stood up at the press conference and said they had done this. we would never know about this. we don't know that there were only five documents initially. just because joe biden's personal attorneys who, by the way, don't have national security clearance, said they found these classified documents and did the right thing. that doesn't mean anything to me. it shouldn't mean much to the american people. >> sean: congressman, you stated the national archives is stonewalling on the biden document scandal. what is your take on hunter's $50,000 a month payment, total of $580,000. apparently not indicated on joe biden's tax returns, in terms of rent money that he was paying his own father. i can understand that down in florida on an oceanfront property or malibu, california, or silicon valley, but i really

don't get delaware getting that kind of rent for one room. >> that doesn't make sense. we're looking into that. that's one reason we requested bank documents, bank records. we're going to be looking attack records, just like the house ways and means committee did on the former president trump. we're going to continue to look into this and all other areas of revenue from joe biden and from the biden family. look, you said it great in your monologue. this family's been involved in influence peddling for a decade. they ephor received millions of dollars from anonymous sources in china. that's very concerning. we know that for a fact. now the question is, how much of that trickled down to joe biden? that's a major part of our investigation. once we get these bank records and bank documents, we'll start holding our public hearings. i think the american people will learn a lot about what influence peddling is and how much involved joe biden was with the family influence peddling schemes. >> sean: congressman you sent a

letter to fbi director wray urging the fbi to investigate hunter's relationship with a suspected chinese spy. jackie bao. what can you tell us about this person of interest? >> we're looking into her. i have reached out to people on the intelligence committee that have a little higher security clearance. this is something that should be very concerning. this has a lot of similarities to the erin swalwell situation. she was born in america. she went to china, to a university, the university that has the reputation of developing their spies and developing their cyber attackers and things like that. one she graduated, she went to work for the ccp. that was on her resume. she worked there. this isn't speculation. we know that she worked there for several years. and then moved back to the united states. low and behold, she started working for hunter biden. how they met, i have no idea. but she worked for hunter biden. on the lap top, one of the things we presented at the press

conference was a power point presentation of the united states all the locations of natural gas distributors. it was a power planted for a plan for the biden family with joe being the big guy. this is the deal joe was supposed to be the big guy in. they were going to help not only sell liquefied gas to ccp, but they were going to help the chinese start taking investments in the drillers for natural gas. this is an opportunity for the bidens to help china get their foot in the door on the infrastructure of our energy industry in america. this should be very concerning. this is another reason we are investigating this family. >> sean: i'm going to make a prediction congressman. it will be your investigation that shows joe biden lied to the american people when he said he never had even a conversation with his son or any family member about their foreign business dealings. it's going to come down to the money. the money will prove that money came from china and russia and

ukraine and joe biden, this will be influence peddling. that will be the charge. that's my prediction. let's see if i'm right. we appreciate you being on, congressman comer. thank you. fake news, cnn, now reporting federal investigators interviewed the biden attorney who first discovered the documents. does that mean he is now a witness to a potential crime? interesting observation from our own contributor jonathan turley on this very issue. my understanding is you have the guy that found the first document being an attorney. but we're being told that aides and other attorneys are looking for other documents, some of whom don't even have a security clearance, jonathan. >> right. all of this gets curiouser and curiouser by the day. that report involving that attorney indicated that this interview occurred but there was no 302, which is the type of document that many of us use on criminal defense work. it is essentially the record

created in criminal cases by fbi agents. so this was treated as a very informal interview. the fact is that by november 2nd, they had found highly classified documents. they did not know how many more existed. they did know that these documents likely had been transferred more than once, and that they had been out there for probably six years. so in the midst of all of that, according to the wall street journal, they were offered the opportunity to search the biden residence. now, why on earth would the fbi not take that opportunity? i mean, what is the possible reason for saying, no, we're really not inclined to do that. you're embarrassing us. you do it. it's bizarre. and so not only did they allow uncleared lawyers to look for highly classified information, but those lawyers then continue to find them over 60 days and

the fbi doesn't seem to have done a thing. >> sean: just breaking, just to be clear. federal investigators did interview biden's attorney who initially discovered the classified documents. you're a democrat, jonathan. i want to talk about a double standard. the raid at mar a-lago. the fbi had already been in the room where they found, quote, the documents. they had unfettered access to that room. they said, would you mind putting a padlock on the door. the trump team complied. why the raid? why does hillary clinton have all of though documents, many more than were found on donald trump's president, top secret classified e-mails on servers 33,000 deleted e-mails that we never discovered, devices destroyed with hammers and sim cards missing. that didn't seem to be a big deal to the media at the time. it was a big deal with donald trump. once again we're getting a series of excuses from democrats. is that a double standard? >> well, i think there's really

great concerns here. i said the fbi didn't do a thing, i was talking about doing something in terms of actual searches and securing these documents. the fact is when it came to searching for the documents, they continue to say, no, use your private counsel, uncleared, unknown person. they were doing the interviews. they were eventually assigning a u.s. attorney to look at this. but the documents themselves, the search for those documents remained in private counsel's hands. that works to the advantage of the president. it means all those initial discoveries, we will have to take the word of counsel of how they were found, the conditions they were found in, whether they were observable with class -- >> sean: so they are a witness for their own client's case? they become a witness at that point. >> yeah. look, comparison to the trump mar a-lago situation, there's obviously differences here. according to the fbi, they believe false statements were made, there was obstruction. there were differences.

and there were also similarities. we don't know the full extent of the similarities because we don't know much. we're not getting a lot of answers here from the government. but those documents at mar a-lago were housed in a storage room protected by secret service. the fbi had no idea where the rest of the documents were and were not inclined to send agents to look as opposed to unknown, uncleared private counsel. >> sean: jonathan turley, as always, grated insight. we appreciate you being with us. time for the hannity hot seat. the topic is, are the media treating biden differently than donald trump and hillary clinton on the subject of classified material? here to answer fox news contributor richard fowler. explain to me, richard, if it was such a big deal, why in july of 2016 when james comey laid out all of hillary's top secret classified information, e-mail chains on her server. now that we know we never found

the 33,000 e-mails that she deleted with bleach pit or the devices destroyed with hammers or the sim cards removed. no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute in that case. then we have the mar a-lago raid. we have three instances, four separate location of top secret documents with biden. as a democrat, can you be intellectually honest enough to admit there's a double standard? >> well, first of all, you're mixing a lot of different stories together. >> sean: they are all the same about three different people with top secret classified information and the treatment of the three. focus. you can keep up. >> you're right. i am keeping up. you're right. they're three different people. let's start with three different individuals. in the case of hillary clinton, seven days before the general election james comey comes out and says there are more e-mails indicating there might be some nefarious activity done by the former secretary of state.

one would argue that could have cost hillary clinton the election. some in the camp would say it did cost her the election. >> sean: slow down. my sources told me at the time -- remember, he exonerated her in july of 2016 but the -- anthony weiner laptop showed more e-mails that they had not looked at. >> seven days before the general election. >> sean: they're all from new york -- let me finish. from new york law enforcement that they were going to break the story, so comey had no choice. >> that was seven days before the general election. >> sean: that's right. >> after the fbi did a sweep of that laptop, days before the election, they found there was no nefarious activity but it was already too late. there's a lot of folks out there that believe that cost hillary clinton the election. >> sean: answer my question. >> i am. you're trying to compare hillary clinton -- >> sean: hillary clinton never had her home raid, nor did joe

biden. same exact thing. the fbi was in mar a-lago. they had unfettered access. >> hillary clinton testified in front of a congressional panel for 17 hours. she also testified -- >> sean: her home wasn't raided. richard, keep up. her home wasn't raided. trump's was. >> she was in front of a u.s. attorney for a number of hours. i'm waiting to get to donald trump. then we get to former president trump. over the summer, the national archives sent him a number of letters saying, mr. president, you have documents that we'd like to get back. the president and his team ignored those letters. finally then his lawyers sent a letter saying we sent you although documents back. the national archives said, no, you have not. >> sean: let me refresh your memory. we don't have a lot of time. you recall before the raid the fbi was in the very room where

those classified documents were found. they were there. >> this is not about the fbi. this is about the national archives. >> sean: they didn't need to write letters. they saw it all. they could have taken it with them that day. they chose not to. they asked for a padlock. they got the padlock and then comes the raid anyway. joe biden and hillary clinton were not treated that way. i'll give you the last word. >> to be clear. sure. to be clear, this is not under the jurisdiction of the fbi. when it comes to classified documents and the presidential records act, that's under the jurisdiction of the national archives. the national archives said to the president, we need those documents. federal judge, a federal judge issued a subpoena and the subpoena was served. it was not a raid. >> sean: under democratic demonstrations, they only raided one president, one presidential candidate, that was trump. the other candidates got different treatment. that's not equal justice or

equal application of our laws. that's not good for this country. >> it was not a raid. >> sean: i appreciate you being with us. when we come back, hate speech laws. are they coming to the u.s.? we'll explain. you won't believe what john kerry said at the wef. don't trust this organization. straight ahead. if you have diabetes, then getting on the dexcom g6 is the single most important thing you can do. and it's covered by medicare. before dexcom g6, i was frustrated. all of that finger-pricking, my a1c was still stuck. (female announcer) dexcom g6 sends your glucose numbers to your phone or receiver without fingersticks, so you can make better decisions in the moment. (earl) my a1c has never been lower. (female announcer) dexcom g6 is the #1 recommended cgm system. call now to get started. (bright music)

>> sean: now many self-proclaimed experts of all things media, politics, our plaint, climate alarmism. they gather at the word economic forum. their conference is this week, wfe. this includes brian selter who moderated a panel on, quote misinformation.

to be hair, hump ty does know a lot of information and how to spread it. >> term fake news and disinformation, it was popularized six years ago. where are we today versus them? >> what do you mean? >> this was a hot popular topic. there was an awakening about it. social networks felt pressure. now where are we? where are we today? >> it's a great -- to be clear, terms like fake news and enemies of the people have been popularized cyclically in society in some of the most, you know, repressive and dangerous moments. >> sean: one participant even went all in on the need for banning more speech. even joe manchin appeared to be hostile to the first amendment, unfortunately. the even bigger question is what is the world economic forum's real agenda, their real mission? doesn't sound like they're too big on free speech.

do we need another international body committed to underminding american sovereignty? are the u.s. just a bunch of suckers giving forums like davos so much influence, the u.n., we pay for it, harris climate accords, who. why do we pay for this? even the u.s. taxpayer dollars, they're on the hook for wef projects. one thing we know for sure, the group is all in on the climate cult alarmist agenda. this week in davos you have john kerry himself, now calling, praising climate warriors for their vow to save the planet. they're expecting 1,000 private jets to fly there for the conference. it's almost extreme to think about, or extraterrestrial to think about, his words. saving the planet. take a look. >> when you stop to think about it, it's pretty extraordinary

that we, select group of human beings, because of whatever touched us at some point in our lives, are able to sit in a room and come together and actually talk about saving the planet. i mean, it's almost extraterrestrial to think about, quote, saving the planet. if you said that to most people, most people would think you are a crazy tree hugging lefty do gooder, whatever. but really, that's where we are. >> sean: so why is it the biggest promoters of the climate cult alarmism live the most lavish lifestyles? here with reaction fox news contributor joe concha and journalist michael shellenberger. michael, i'll start with you. it's pretty extraordinary that we, a select group of human beings because of whatever touched us at some point in our lives, are able to sit in a room and come together and talk about saving the planet. 1,000 private jets estimated to

take people to davos to talk about saving the planet. help me out. i can't handle the hypocrisy. >> he kind of says it all there, doesn't he? really, those privileged select people who use the most fossil fuels, who have the largest carbon footprint, trying to prevent other countries from using them. in particular, poor asian and african nations are being actively denied the natural gas and fossil fuels that we take for granted. the european union has tried to prevent them from getting fertilizers that they need. we see this every year at the climate talks. it is unconscionable to be kicking away the ladder from people seeking a better life. of course, it goes hand in hand with an enfor the to censor freedom of speech. they're talking about dismoorings. they want to stamp out people that disagree with their agenda. that's why they're doing it. they want an open mic to be able to spread their own misinformation.

including the idea that climate change threatens human civilization, including the idea that you can power the world on preindustrial renewable technologies. including the idea that we need to move to eating insect protein rather than meat. we've seen a whole lot of dismoorings come out of the world economic forum. people said it was a conspiracy but came right out of davos that we need a great reset to moving toward a low energy renewable powered life. that comes from them. >> sean: let me bring in joe. joe, we're in the paris accord agreement, but china and india are viewed as developing nation and we pay the bulk of money. we know the who is useless. they became propagandas for the communist chinese with covid. we know the u.n., we pay the bulk of monies there, too, has historically been anti-semitic and anti-american. now we've got the wef, the world -- what is their mission really about, except for hypocrisy and

climate alarmism and worldwide socialism and other things that i can't even begin to mention at this point. >> right. it's such irony that brian seltser of all people was invited there to talk about disinformation and hate speech. despite what i have been telling my children, apparently you can put humpty dumpty back together. he should be nowhere near lecturing anybody on the dangers of disinformation. he is a purveyor of it. he presented the steel dossier as gospel instead of gossip. the same guy who allow one of his unhinged guests to say donald trump had killed more people than hitler, stalin combined then blamed nonexistent audio problems for not pushing back on that. same guy who said it was too early to determine if cnn + was a success or failure after it

lasted, what, 30 days. so congratulations to all the parents sending their kids to harvard for 80 grand a year. now you have not only professor steltser, but professor bill deblasio giving lessons in government. what is hate speech? you ask ten different people, you'll get ten different answers. it's subjective. it's an ear of the beholder thing. the last people, the very last people who should be in charge of deciding what is and what is not hate speech, are members of the government. it's going to be weaponized to advance agendas. if i call covid a china virus, is that a hate speech. if i say the president of the united states is a pathological liar. if i said covid came from wuhan, is that disinformation? we could play this all day long. >> sean: we'd all be in jail. enemies of the state. trust me. straight ahead. thank you both. another day, another bizarre series of blunders for biden.

tonight it involves kamala harris. you won't believe the latest. we'll play them for you. there is a congress woman that wants to criminalize and end freedom of speech as you know it. i'm not joking. not funny either. straight ahead. aah, it's a good day to cough. oh, no! bye, bye cough. later chest congestion. hello 12 hours of relief. 12 hours!! hmmm, ok. not coughing at yoga? antiquing not coughing? not coughing at the movies?! hashtag still not coughing?! aaah. oww! mucinex dm gives you 12 hours of relief from chest congestion and any type of cough, day or night. it's not cough season. it's always comeback season.

i'm not a doctor. i'm not even in a doctor's office. i'm standing on the street, talking to real people about their heart. how's your heart? my heart's pretty good. you sure? i think so. how do you know? you're driving a car? you have the check engine light, but the heart doesn't have a hey, check heart sign. i want to show you something. put both fingers right on those pads. there you go. in 30 seconds, we're going to have a medical grade ekg. -there it is. -that is you. look at that. with kardiamobile, the fda cleared personal ekg device. you can take a medical grade ekg in just 30 seconds from anywhere. kardiamobile is proven to detect atrial fibrillation, one of the leading causes of stroke. and it's the only personal ekg that can also detect normal heart rhythm, bradycardia and tachycardia. how much do you think this device cost?

probably $1,000. $99. wow. that's impressive. it's never been more important to check your heart at home. kardiamobile is now available for just $79. order at kardiamobile.com or amazon.

>> sean: president joey starting off the week with another bunch of blundering including mispronouncing the vice president's name earlier today. take a look. >> there's several other members of the california delegation here. also here along with several city and state leaders. but as kamala said, we're all closely monitoring the storm, the floods, the landslides all across california. >> sean: joe, if you practice real hard, kamala. not that hard.

it only got worse when biden awkwardly kneeled but the vice president wanted nothing to do with any of this during a photo op with the golden state warriors. take a look. should be thankful he got back up. blunders are the least of biden's problems as he continues to double down on the democrats more extreme positions including wanting to ban what he calls assault weapons on his watch. take a look. >> i'll say what i said then. i'll say it over and over again. i am going to get assault weapons banned. i did it once. i'm gonna do it again. i love my right wing friends who

talk about the tree of liberty watering the blood of patriots. if you need work about taking on the federal government, you need some f-15s, you don't need an ar-15. i'm serious. think about it. >> sean: i'm serious. think about it. reaction former white house chief of staff, former arkansas governor. i'm not really sure, i guess people have gotten used to it. however, i have a theory. part of it is, i'm just suspicious. i have no reason to be. i have no facts to back it up. but the timing of all the classified information being revealed makes me suspect. are democrats, are many of them that maybe knew about something that don't want joe to run in 2024 or is that pure speculation and completely out of the realm of possibility? >> well, it's a wild story, sean. it's so bizarre. the trump story's pretty

straight forward. picked a fight with the archives and the doj. they're going back and forth. they got tired of it. they raided mar a-lago. it comes down to a question of law that jonathan turley outlined earlier. in this case, if you go back to when biden was in mexico, he said -- he perfectly chose to say the penn documents were the only documents that were out there. then the next day the corvette documents came out. now either you're right and it's sabotage and people are leaking around him to the press to undermind him. he's lying. maybe he can't remember because he can't remember anything. and maybe he doesn't know the full story. but one of these outcomes has to be correct. and you're right. i mean, he cannot remember anyone's name. but at the same time, he hid in his basement and won. he can't remember what day it

is. they are getting every democrat wish list done. open borders, shuttingdown energy, trillions of dollars spent. it goes back to -- you sort of alluded to this, but a great quote, which is sort of a pop quiz. who's the bigger idiot, the idiot or the idiot that gets fooled by the idiot? at some point people have to wake up and see what's happening in this country and see what kind of mess this president's brought us on. he's doing it all while not remembering what day it is, whose name it is. and yet they're jamming this down the throat with their democratic wish list and they're getting it done. >> sean: yeah. governor huckabee, you're a smart guy. joe biden spends 40% of his time outside of the white house at one of his residences most of the time. there's no visitor logs at all. now, why would that be? why would they not want us to know who's meeting with the president of the united states? my first thought would go to his

declining cognitive abilities and his health. is there something he's trying to hide here? why wouldn't they have visitor logs like that? >> i think it's a real legitimate question. you can't go in front of a president without previously providing your name, your social security number. there's a whole lot of screening that goes on. i can't believe girl scouts go to his front door, ring the bell and sell cookies to him without there being some scrutiny. it just doesn't work like that. so this is bizarre. anybody who's ever been around a sitting vice president or president knows that they don't live like the rest of us. and i just think this is crazy, but the truth is he can't pronounce his own vice president's name? we're supposed to be told that's terrible if we pronounce it wrong. he's the president. he doesn't seem to know who she is. >> sean: great point. the few times i have been to the

white house with either president trump or then president bush, hi, mr. hannity, can i see your photo i.d., please? all right, guys, thank you. when we come back, you aren't going to believe this. one radical democratic socialist is actually proposing legislation that would criminalize freedom of speech. what does that mean for all of you watching? and tonight last call. you get the last word. you get to grade yours truly, straight ahead. i'm ready for whatever i get.

i was injured in a car crash. i had no idea how much my case was worth. i called the barnes firm. when a truck hit my son, i had so many questions about his case. i called the barnes firm. it was the best call i could've made. your case is often worth more than insuran call the barnes firm to find out i could've made. what your case could be worth. we will help get you the best result possible. ♪ the barnes firm, injury attorneys ♪ call one eight hundred,est resul eight million ♪

>> sean: all right. today democrats are doubling down on their censorship agenda because shea low jackson lee is introducing a new bill to crack down on so called hate speech and white supremacy, but the language is so broad that it could result in the criminalization of all kinds of

speech. and it appears to be in direct violation of your first amendment. the bill would impose criminal penalties for anyone who publish material advancing white supremacy, white supremacist ideology, replacement theory or hate creech that villifies or is directed at any nonwhite person or group. not sure what all of it means. here to answer it leo 2.0 terrell, former dnc press secretary jose munoz is with us. sir, i'll ask you first before i get to leo. you've read the first amendment to the constitution. i know you know what it says. pretty clear and unambiguous. congress shall make no law establishing a religion prohibiting free exercise there of or bridging the freedom of speech or the press or the right of the people to peacefully assemble. what part of that first amendment doesn't shiela jackson lee understand? and why is it only one form of racism when there are multiple

forms of racism? >> look, sean, i understand the argument there. we have to remember freedom of speech has limitations. when freedom of speech is directly connected to an act of violence towards someone, it's limited. >> sean: why only one form of racism? you didn't answer my question. why only one form of racism when there are numerous forms of racism? >> well, maybe we need to add several bills. let's be realistic. i don't think you will get passed on this gop -- >> sean: do you want it to pass? >> i think it should be looked at 100%. >> sean: i condemn all racism. leo, go ahead. >> let me be as clear as possible. this man is trying to defend the indefensible. shame on you. you know you cannot defend it. basically, it's a bill. as a lawyer, 30 years, as a bill, it is to punish white

people for having an opinion. let me finish. sir, you will not come on this network and make a mockery of a bill that punishes white people. let me give you an example. darryl brooks, kenosha, wisconsin. he hated white people. he killed white people by an suv. this bill would not harm him. it's okay for him to do this. this bill is targeted against white people. >> you're looking at this the wrong way. >> sir, we're talking about this bill. this bill. focus on this bill. i dare you to define white supremacy. define replacement theory. you can't. why don't you just admit this bill is indefensible. >> well, let me ask for your concession. this bill has good intentions. white supremacy has no place in america. has no place in america. >> this bill is illegal. this bill is illegal. this bill is illegal. >> this bill is not illegal.

freedom of speech has limitation. >> it will never see daylight. >> leo, you know it. shame on you. it is discriminatory towards white americans and you know it. >> sean: we'll leave it there. >> you can laugh all you want. this is a serious issue. >> sean: when we come back, the last word is yours. you get to weigh in what you like, don't like about the show, and you rate little old me, straight ahead.

....

♪ this feels so right... ♪ adt systems now feature google products like the nest cam with floodlight, with intelligent alerts

when a person or familiar face is detected. sam. sophie's not here tonight. so you have a home with no worries. brought to you by adt. >> hannity: "last call." viewers get to rate the show, those they like and don't like. welcome from new york. >> hello, sean. thank you so much for inviting me on. we're both alumni of delphi and i grew up in a town right next to you. garden city, and you grew up in franklin square. >> hannity: yes, i did. even went there for a year.

i met the dean's list there, how about that. what did you like or dislike about tonight's show? >> well, your show is absolutely the high point of my evening no matter how bizarre the day has been, i know you'll bring us the hannity-sanity and as soon as i hear that powerful music i know we'll hear some great things. my whole family watches, an i hope you get more people on from the other side. >> hannity: okay. we had a couple of people from the other side on tonight. mr. fowler and mr. leo. you like more of a debate format, you prefer that? sometimes that gets loud and a little interrupttive and people don't seem to like that part. >> a little bit with richard fowler, maybe, you could have let him finish his sentences a little more, but, i'm just saying. >> hannity: i have a limited period of time but i'll take the constructive criticism. that's a fair criticism that i

have heard before. >> lovely, 2.0. i would love more of senator john kennedy. he has such great quips and humpty-dumpty and you get an a-plus-plus from me. >> thanks. >> hannity: got to roll. they are calling my number. that's all the time we have left. let not your heart be troubled. laura next. we'll see you tomorrow night and as always, she has a great show. >> laura: hello, everyone, in the the "the ingraham angle" from washington tonight. claus and the game. that's the focus. the associated press, which was once considered the gold standard in reporting, is now little more than a glorified print version of msnbc. they have gone from keeping powerful interests in check to protecting them at all costs. so when the globalists at the world economic forum need cove