possible. please set your dvr so you never, ever, ever miss an episode of "hannity." in the meantime, let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham and "the ingraham angle" is next. we will see you on monday. thank you for coming. [applause] ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> i'm sean duffy and for laura ingraham and this is a special edition of "the ingraham angle" live from new york city. we start tonight with mayor pete. he's probably regretting taking so much me time after the toxic train derailment in east palestine. the house oversight committee announcing tonight that they are launching an investigation into how he handled everything. despite the new spots delete to ensure safe and rival transportation in the united states, you ignore the catastrophe for over a week. he finally did make a trip

yesterday, and he was looking a little more like a child dressing up for halloween than a cabinet secretary there to bring hope and help to scared residents. here is how mayor pete did eventually respond to his 20-day delay. >> what i tried to do is balance to cothings: my desire to be involved and engaged on the ground, which is how i'm wired to act, and my desire to follow the norm of transportation secretaries. i have to think about whether i got that balance right. >> sean: no thinking needed, pothole pete. he didn't strike the right balance. joining me now is james comer. congressman, good to see you. i want to get your take on this, because we reached out to mayor pete for a comment and we were actually referred to this tweet that says, "i am along to learn, but the chair of the house oversight committee thinks that ntsb is part of our

department. ntsb is independent, and with good reason." "we will review and respond properly." congressman, how do you respond to mayor pete's ridiculous tweet? >> he referred to a typo in the letter that had absolutely nothing to do with what we were requesting from mayor pete. we want to know the response from the secretary of transportation. the people in this community in ohio are concerned. no one from the federal government seemed to express an interest in their well-being. no one at high levels of the government. and we want to know what communication took place, who made what decision based on burning the chemicals, and how do we know who is coordinating with the epa and other emergency agencies that will ensure that groundwater is not contaminated? we just have a lot of questions, and they said administration has been too busy to provide answers for the american people.

the president is out in ukraine promising more tax dollars to ukraine, to protect their border, when our board is not secure. and the secretary of transportation has had personal time. he hasn't had time to go out there. so we want to know exactly who is in charge and what decisions were made and when they were made. >> sean: not only for this train derailment, but maybe we want to hear about what happened with the faa or the supply chain or with baby formula or with southwest over christmas. do you think you're going to get a response from mayor pete after that flippant text? or tweet, i should say? >> it just shows the arrogance and the tone deafness of the said administration. we have a lot of concerns with what's going on in the transportation cabinet. we have airline delays, we are having rail disasters. we have an infrastructure crisis. the federal government just invested a significant amount of money in infrastructure, and all we have heard from the secretary of transportation is that infrastructure is racist, and that there are too many white people that are going to be

working in these construction jobs. i mean, this isn't the type of leadership i think the american people expect from the secretary of transportation. so we have a lot of questions for mayor pete, and hopefully he is going to cave to public pressure and start providing us with answers. this is the oversight committee. we are not going to let up just because the democrat turned a blind eye to providing any type of oversight in the first two years of the biden administration. that's over now. the republicans are in the majority and we have questions the american people deserve answers for. >> sean: if he doesn't comply, i hope you reduce the funding of his department. i want to move on. you have news for us in the investigation into hunter biden and the laptop. >> we do. we are requesting information from all the stakeholders that were involved in the various different biden family influence-peddling schemes, and we are glad that people are now coming forward. obviously the biden family isn't, but that doesn't matter

at this particular point in time, because there are so many people that were affiliated with the bidens and have information we need to go along with the bank records that we will get. and i think we are going to be able to trace the money back to the sources in china, the sources in ukraine, and the sources in russia, and hopefully we can get answers for what the biden family did to receive this much money. millions and millions of dollars coming from china, russia, and ukraine for services that were not sure exactly what they were. this could put this is administration and a compromise position with our adversaries and that's why we are investigating. >> sean: the fbi should be doing a forensic audit of joe biden. that would make it real easy. it shouldn't be our job they do at the fbi's actual role is here. but just real quick, will you subpoena hunter biden cannot he just missed a deadline to turn over documents to your committee. >> we are making sure every i's dotted and every t is cross.

you know it goes to court if they don't comply with the subpoena. want to make sure that when the issue subpoenas they are going to hold up in court. in the meantime we are going ino continue to requesting permission from the bidens, and we've got plenty of information to digest now. we are doing that, and i can tell you, this is a serious investigation and the american people should be very concerned about why the bidens received so much money from the chinese communist party linked affiliates in china. >> sean: congressman comber, they are looking forward to the answers your committee can provide the american people. thanks for joining me tonight and thanks for all your hard work. >> we have to put ukrainians in a position where they can make advances this spring and summer and move to a place where they can negotiate from a position of strength. >> sean: well, biden doesn't want them too strong, because how can they withstand the never-ending war and continue to put the needs of other countries

ahead of our own? it's been a year since russia invaded ukraine and we are still as deeply involved as ever. when biden says we are in it for as long as it takes, he literally means as long as it takes. >> level with the american people. how long do you think we will be involved in this war in ukraine? >> l, savannah, i can't predict the future when it comes to the war in ukraine, no one can. >> sean: well, he's right, we can't predict the future, but i can take a guess based on the evidence they've already given us. let's start with the treasury department. >> the united states has been providing economic support to ukraine. there is an additional $10 billion that we expect to provide over the next nine months. >> sean: okay, so the administration thinks it will go on for another nine months. hold on, not so fast. last month, biden made this pledge. >> today i am announcing that the united states will be sending 31 abram tanks to ukraine. it'll enhance ukraine's capacity

to defend its territory and achieve a strategic objective. >> sean: maybe those tanks will do just that, but it's going to take a while. yesterday the u.s. secretary said those tanks might not even get to ukraine by the end of the year. it's february! they can't provide tanks by december? she went on to say that there are longer timelines involved, but i think there are options that are less than two years, less than a year and a half. now it looks like we will be in ukraine for a year and a half plus? joined me out as kurt schlichter, townhall.com senior columnist, retired army colonel, and of author of "wille back." and author of "liberal misery." thank you for joining me. what is your prediction on how long we are going to be in ukraine? >> i have no idea. of course, that makes me the same as biden and his administration. they have no idea.

look, we are pursuing a very dangerous course of action with absolutely no strategic objectives. i keep seeing a bunch of tactics. "we are going to arm them, but not enough to win! me you are going to negotiate, or maybe not. or, or, or --" who knows what these people are doing. i'm not anti-ukraine. i went and trained ukrainian soldiers in ukraine. ukrainians are part of the battalion i deployed with. i respect them for fighting back against the russians. but you know it? i am an american. what are the american interests? how are we supporting them? how are we serving them? how are we supposed to explain to the american people that we have endless dollars to defend the border of a foreign country, but not pay to defend our own? we've got people being driven out of their homes in east palestine, ohio, and biden can't even make a quick hop over there, beacon wing his way to kyiv. it's a disaster on every level.

>> sean: that's a good point. i'm a anti-ukraine, i'm just pro-american. really well said. if you look at how this conflict is playing out, how does it ever end? >> people in washington are asking that question, especially -- it's not just the biden administration. there are many republicans in congress who are not asking this question. how does this end? what are the american interests, as kurt just said? those are people dumb i complete the undefined, and i think most importantly is that, in the event that we are looking to an end for this, with the mindset of vladimir putin to what is the perspective of russia? and imagine for a second that it's the united states that is in the position of losing a war, running out of options. let's say china is closing in on this. what do we do in that case? i don't think it ends very pretty for the world, for us.

and yet, that is something that no one ever -- you have people like lindsey graham, "we've got to do everything we can come every single thing we can. any money, whatever it takes." okay, that's fine, and yet, what does russia say to that? what is a perspective? what is vladimir putin's perspective? i'm running up against a wall here and i have no options. as a very scary scenario and that's exactly where they are pushing us. >> sean: it really is. brad paisley has a new song out, and msnbc's nicole wallace couldn't get enough. watch this. >> brad's new song, which is out today, features ukraine's president zelenskyy and it's called "same here," and it is so beautiful. ♪ from the songs that you sing to the drink that you drink ♪ >> we are fighting to defend our houses and families. >> art is the quickest way to somebody's heart, and a chance to sort of reach the folks in our country that are maybe getting inundated with news and facts. >> you need to hear the song,

every word of it. i was going to try not to cry, but i might. >> sean: kurt, were you brought to tears? >> i'm sorry, sean. like all southern californians, i grew up on postpunk power pop. this country music stuff frightens and confuses me. anything nicole wallace likes, i immediately suspect. >> sean: well, you're right. while that was playing, i saw that you are actually tearing up is that song was being played. thank you for that. >> just choking up a little bit. i will say, the romanticization of this war is absolutely -- of his every sign of a decay in america, it's this, the romanticization of war. it's looking really bad. by the way, i just want to say real quick, those kinds of things where you think there is this happy movie ending where putin goes away and cries and sulks off into the distance, that's not going to happen. that's not what the end of this war looks like. >> sean: thanks for joining

me. i appreciate it. we have been getting worn for days that china is sending legal aid to russia. this should garner a really strong reaction from the president, right? >> reporter: what are you going to do? [inaudible] >> sean: joining me now is a great gordon chang, author of "the great u.s.-china tech war." good to see you, thanks for joining me. give me your take. joe biden has made some warnings to china about providing lethal aid to russia. does that have any teeth? >> it certainly doesn't, sean. china has been giving lethal aid to russia from the beginning of this war and the most recent reporting is very graphic. a breaking defense website says every day, the biggest cargo plane in the world takes off from china's central region with

ammunition. they turn off their transponders when they depart because they know what they're doing. biden knows what's going on despite that, and yet he keeps on issuing these hollow warnings. and we know that hollow warnings always end in disaster. >> sean: china came out with a 12-point peace proposal. what you think about that? >> all they were doing was trying to support russia. they want a cease-fire, they want russia to have the ability to rearm, and clearly zelenskyy doesn't like this, because he wants to press the advantage, and we should do that, because we should have a policy of winning. biden doesn't have that. his policy as we just heard is to stretch this out for years. >> sean: we are $31.5 trillion in debt. over the last year we spent $115 billion in ukraine. doesn't our debt project weakness as well as allowing china to steal our technology, empty threats by our president? >> what we are seeing is the united states these commitments

now, and this is imperial overstretch. china is overstretched, as well, but the point is that we need to devote our resources to what's going to be good for the u.s. and to win. we can get this war in ukraine over if we decide we are going to enact. it's like reagan, who said, "my theory of the cold war easily win, they lose." biden needs understand that. >> sean: and we had a present with the america first mindset of saying what's best for america, not for ukraine or china or russia, but for the u.s. if anything, it shows china doesn't respect us. listen to what defense secretary austin just revealed. watch this. >> you tried to call your chinese counterpart, and they didn't answer. >> we hope that the minister will have a change of heart. >> ends last time he talked to him? >> the last time i talked to him was a couple of months ago. so it's really important that we maintain open lines of communication. >> and right now there's not really one between the u.s. military and the chinese military.

>> that's right. >> sean: gordon, the china military is not responding to the u.s. military? how concerned should we be? >> first of all, i don't think austin should have been trying to call the chinese. >> sean: i agree. >> this was right after the chinese bible and pray they violate our sovereignty and commit an act of war and we go and beg to talk to them? by the way, there is something else wrong with that. the minister, that's the chinese central government. that does not control the military. lloyd austin's counterpart is xi jinping in his role as chairman of the communist party central military commission. the general has absolutely no authority over the chinese military. austin shouldn't be trying to talk to him. >> sean: so your point is, by calling the chinese after the balloon, it projects complete weakness. >> it happens all the time, sean. we americans believe communication is so important. we should stop talking to the chinese. we should intimidate them, we should scare them. maybe they would stop this stuff if we actually started to act like americans. >> sean: my goodness, gordon chang. always smart.

think for having such a clear vision on the threat of china. thanks for coming tonight. >> thanks, sean. >> sean: a district attorney tougher on his own staff then a trans child molester accused of murder? only in l.a. reaction, coming up next.

out here, you're more than just a landowner. you're a gardener. a landscaper. a hunter. because you didn't settle for ordinary. same goes for your equipment. versatile, powerful, durable kubota equipment. more goes into it. so you get more out of it.

♪ ♪ >> sean: you won't believe this story. the radical district attorney in los angeles just suspended a prosecutor for misgendering a trans child molester, accused of completing heinous crimes. fox news correspondent kevin corke is here with the details. >> you won't believe this story. striking once again, say critics, this time it is a formerly prosecuted by the name of shay sanna who is feeling the brunt of his latest decision. accused of him as he pointed o out, "misgendering" and "deadnaming" a convicted child molester by the name of hanna tubs, accused of beating a man to death in kern county. for that, sanna has been suspended by gascon. for his part, tubbs, the convicted child molester, has a lengthy criminal record in california and idaho, under the

name "james tubbs." only now he is identifying as a female. he started that after being arrested in connection with that child molestation case to which he pleaded guilty. attacking a girl in a denny's bathroom stall. sanna has argued in the past that jailhouse phone calls show that tubbs is trying to use gender identity to more or less game the justice system. writing this on twitter, "i was suspended by speaking out against the gascon administration , informing them they are being played is just the excuse for the suspension. sanna adroitly points out that in that phone call with his dad, tubbs reminded his father -- or her father -- when you come to court, make sure you address me as her. nothing to see here, move it along. sean? >> sean: kevin corke. disgusting.

thank you. join me now as horace cooper, cochair of project 21, and michael shellenberger, author of "san fran-sicko: why progressives ruin cities." what is your reaction to what kevin corke just told us? >> well, i'm outraged. this tells us all that we need to know about how the wokesters him when they are handling prosecution, not putting the victims as a parody. a child was assaulted by this individual. that ought to be where the conversation begins and where the conversations ends. now we know from a cold case record that this person actually is involved, perhaps, in the death of another person, and as the report indicated, had a lengthy arrest record. we shouldn't be so concerned about hurting the feelings of these predators. we ought to be making sure they

are put in a place where they can never attack again. shame on gascon, shame on these woke prosecutors, because they don't realize the overwhelming number of the victims that are harmed, the kinds of people they don't have the wherewithal to protect themselves or to protect their children. >> sean: michael, you are a california guy. to horace's point, you have gascon who is more concerned about a d.a. or this the d.a. who is offending a trans child molester, then he is about an actual trans child molester. >> it appears in this case that the prosecutor who is fired by gascon was fired as retribution for pointing out the fact that the suspect actually bragged of having trick people into treating him as a trans woman.

so there is a real question here about whether this is truly someone who identifies as trans or whether this is just a scam to get into a woman's prison. this may seem like an obscure issue, but the prime minister of scotland just resigned over the last week because she had allowed prisoners to self identify into whichever gender they wanted, and in one case they sent a mail convict into a woman's prison and it set off an uproar in the country. so it is both the kind of marriage of the two worst worlds. one is the radical woke-is him as a relates to credit not criminal justice, and allowing anybody to claim to be whateverr they want, even in the case of prisoners facing the possibility of going into a woman's prison. >> sean: unbelievable. let's move to st. louis. go ahead. >> sean, i just want to say this -- we are giving attention to this felon when we should

make the central focus on the victims. my biggest criticism, my biggest criticism of these soros-funded prosecutors, is that they act as a publicly funded defense attorney for those that prey on the rest of the innocent. we need to turn back and hold these bad actors accountable. the greater the scum of the few bad actors you will see. >> sean: these victims of child sexual assault, human lives for a lifetime. i want to get your take on this because we are speaking of wilke soros-backed prosecutors. the missouri attorney general has moved to fire kim gardner after a teenager lost both her legs in a crash. that was caused by a suspect who

had violated bond conditions. this seems like a proactive decision to finally go after these corrupt prosecutors by state officials. what do you say? >> i think it's very interesting things. both in los angeles and in st. louis, easy people resisting the woke prosecution agenda speaking out for the first time, the ag is attempting to remove the district attorney from office. what that district attorney has done is the same thing that radically progressive prosecutors have done in san francisco and los angeles, which is basically to let people out, not require that people be held in jail for alleged crimes. the result is repeat offenses. the one in st. louis, the guy in question had violated the electronic monitoring 50 times before the accident. so you have this repeat offense, and these district attorneys are basically acting like defense

attorneys rather than as prosecutors. so these are also cities, i should mention, that are lacking hundreds of police officers. crime is absolutely out of control, homicides remain at record levels. they need to be serious prosecution of serious crimes. >> sean: we now see the impact of weak prosecutors. crime explodes and communities, but these prosecutors keep getting elected. what's happening with voters that would elect these george soros-backed d.a.s and completely destroy their communities? explain that to me. >> we are seeing fund-raising explode, especially when soros-backed organizations and think tanks are able to pour in the kinds of resources that turn a d.a. race into something like a congressional race. shame on the left, who used to claim that when you put money into politics it ruined things. they have set back -- there's a second problem of these

wokesters, and that is that rich people and elites and the well-to-do, they moved to other communities. they can hire security. but the very people that rely most on the criminal justice system are the ones that lose when these soros prosecutors get their way. >> sean: so true. gentlemen, thanks for joining me. i appreciate it. all right. he's a thief, he's a drug addict, he's a liar, but did he murder his wife and son in cold blood? day 2 on the stand, disgraced attorney alex murdaugh, did you get closer to proving his own innocence? we have a sound that everyone talking about. that's coming up next.

my a1c stayed here, it needed to be here. ray's a1c is down with rybelsus®. i'm down with rybelsus®. my a1c is down with rybelsus®. in a clinical study, once-daily rybelsus® significantly lowered a1c better than a leading branded pill. in the same study, people taking rybelsus® lost more weight. rybelsus® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't take rybelsus® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop rybelsus® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. gallbladder problems may occur. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking rybelsus® with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration,

which may worsen kidney problems. need to get your a1c down? you may pay as little as $10 per prescription. this isn't just freight. these aren't just shipments. they're promises. big promises. small promises. cuddly shaped promises. each with a time and a place they've been promised to be. and the people of old dominion never turn away a promise. or over promise. or make an empty promise. we keep them. a promise is everything to old dominion, because it means everything to you.

>> sean: admitted liar alex murdaugh spent time on the stand in his own double murder trial today. the disgraced former lawyer and accused killer use that time to test his own theory about what happened to his wife, maggie, and son, paul. he relates back to a 2019

alleged drunk driving boat accident. it crash and killed a 19-year-old on board. >> i didn't believe that any of the families come of the people that were involved in the boat rack, had anything to do with hurting maggie and paul. but i can tell you, at that time, and as i sit here today, i believe that boat rack... is the reason why pawpaw and maggie were killed. >> we've got random vigilantes because of the boat rack to mexico i don't know that they are random vigilantes. >> what you are telling this jury is that it's a random vigilante. the 12-year-old thought two people, that just happen to know that paul and maggie were both at moselle on june 7th, that knew they would be at the kennels alone, that you would not be there, but only between the times of 8:49 and 9:02 him of that showed without a weapon, and then they traveled the same

exact route that you do around the same time to alameda. that's what you're trying to tell this jury? >> you've got a lot of factors in there, mr. waters, all of which i do not agree with, but some of which i do. >> sean: training now, brian claypool and philip holloway. and adjunct law professor at western commander salzman. thank you for joining me. i want to get all of your responses to this question. what is the most damning evidence you have heard against murdaugh in this trial? >> i've got three words for it: "consciousness of guilt." murdaugh lied about the most material fact in the case. he told law enforcement into code interviews, "i was at home on june 7th on the evening of the murders. i dozed off, fell asleep." and then come through this videotape, this snapshot video that paul took, he is at the kennel, so he's lied about that, and then what he does is he goes

into court and talks about all these other theories. why is that important? because it is devoid of human heart and human emotion. his testimony, sean, was coming from a lawyer, not a grieving father and a grieving husband. i think that is just going to be devastating for him. and the prosecutor, sean come over 25 times -- i was counting today. he kept using the word "you lied." "this lied." "when did you determine you are going to lie?" the jury hears this ad nauseam. this time frame, you only got a few minutes for him to leave and for somebody to come and kill them. it's devastating for his defense. >> sean: philip? >> good evening, sean. thinks for having me. i think one of the best things the prosecutor brought out today during cross-examination, he got the defendant to admit that there was nobody else down there at that kennel in the moments leading up to these murders,

other than himself in the two victims. he got him to concede that point. if that's the case, if he didn't kill him, who did? i think that's probably one of the strongest points that the prosecutor made. however, i think the prosecutor has overplayed some of their hand, because they have not been able to establish motives. despite all the testimony about all these financial crimes. and there's a lot of them, to be sure. despite the fact that he has lied and admitted he has lied, they have not been able to tie any of this stuff up to a motive, a reason to kill this man's wife and his son. and the jury is listening for that. of course we all know prosecutors don't have to prove motive, but when they do, he needs to be something that is credible, because that will take away from the credibility of the rest of their presentation. >> sean: andrew, what do you think? >> i think alex murdaugh and his legal team made a big, big mistake by having him testify. it violates rule number one of criminal defense law, never let

your client testify, because alex murdaugh made omissions with respect to lying about the alibi, with respect to stealing $3.5 million from his clients and having a major opiate addiction. it's a huge, huge problem. you tie in the alibi and lying about it, these jurors are saying, "wait a minute, if i was in this position and my wife and son were killed, what would i do? what i wouldn't do is lie about where i was." i think he's going be convicted and i think he's going be convicted on his own words. >> sean: i was a ta for ten years, spent a lot of time in a courtroom. even the last time i was in, 12-13 years ago, even then -- everybody watched fbi crime files and they wanted to see dna evidence and fingerprints. you think you're going to get what you see on tv, which you adown like we all know you don'. does that play into this case? >> i think that's a great point and that's why there's a potential for a hung jury. there is no way murdaugh will ever be acquitted.

but you might have one or two jurors on the stand will go back and deliberate and say, "wait a minute, we don't have the weapons. we have very little gunshot residue, and an expert said that gunshot residue could have come from a year ago, and there's very little blood on murdaugh." you combine those three lack of forensic tangible evidence, and you could potentially get one juror to hang this case. at the end of the day, you could prove a fact through inference, you could prove a fact through indirect evidence. so i think there is a larger chance he gets convicted then a hung jury. >> sean: no doubt about that. at the very end of the cross examination today, the prosecutor asked this. take a listen. >> you testified yesterday, you were asked about leaving the kennels with your new story. your words were, "i got out of there." correct? >> i believe that's what i said. yes, sir. >> and you also said during your

testimony, on cross-examination, that you hurt the ones he loved the most, didn't you? >> i did say that. >> sean: philip? >> but, see, here's the thing -- she gave him an opportunity to go and explain that. he did that all throughout cross-examination. by the way, i don't think it was a mistake. i think the defendant, all things being equal, has testified very well. the prosecutor has not asked leading questions. they have asked open-ended questions. they have asked questions they didn't know the answer to, and because they have done those things, that violates the basic rules that we all have learned in terms of trying cases and trial advocacy. because they've done those things, they have given them the opportunity to run away with the discussion in this courtroom. has he admitted he is a liar? of course he has, and he's admitted that he's a thief, but he's been able to make the case on cross-examination that he is a liar and he's a thief but he would never kill his wife and his son.

so i think the prosecutor has probably not had the perry mason experience that they have apparently been trying to get. the defendant is, i think, dominating the discussion in that courtroom. >> sean: maybe that's the last question for you, because i started watching the testimony yesterday, and i thought murdaugh did a pretty good job, and he had a widely way to tell his story to the jury and become somewhat likable. even though i know he is a known liar. what say you? >> he's a charming guy, he's an attorney. he was a prosecutor for a while, so he came off about as well as you can come off. but the problem is, from the drug addictions, to stealing from your clients, doing all these nefarious and horrific things, there's a lot of people who are sitting in prison right now based axis of the f of circumstantial evidence, and i think mr. murdaugh is going be the next one. stealing gentlemen, we will see what happens. thank you for joining me and for your insights. you may have deleted your tiktok, but that doesn't mean your kids have. we are about to show you the

ridiculous stuff that is so important to them, that they are willing to ignore the china risk to have these stupid videos online. we'll talk about it coming up nexte so...t. fries...soup and s. thank you! like your workplace benefits and retirement savings. with voya, considering all your financial choices together... can help you make smarter decisions. for a more confident financial future. hey, a tandem bicycle. can't do that by yourself. (voya mnemonic.) voya. well planned. well invested. well protected. i'm not a doctor. i'm not even in a doctor's office. i'm standing on the street, talking to real people about their heart. how's your heart? my heart's pretty good. you sure? i think so. how do you know? you're driving a car? you have the check engine light, but the heart doesn't have a hey, check heart sign. i want to show you something. put both fingers right on those pads. there you go.

in 30 seconds, we're going to have a medical grade ekg. -there it is. -that is you. look at that. with kardiamobile, the fda cleared personal ekg device. you can take a medical grade ekg in just 30 seconds from anywhere. kardiamobile is proven to detect atrial fibrillation, one of the leading causes of stroke. and it's the only personal ekg that can also detect normal heart rhythm, bradycardia and tachycardia. how much do you think this device cost? probably $1,000. $99. wow. that's impressive. it's never been more important to check your heart at home. kardiamobile is now available for just $79. order at kardiamobile.com or amazon.

♪ ♪ >> sean: it's friday night, so let's have a little fun.

it's time to check in with generation tiktok. who better to talk on this then charlie hurt? "washington times" opinion editor and fox news contributor, and amber ac. good to see you all. the first clip on how a girlfriend is trying to improve the relationship has completed divided the internet. watch this. >> my boyfriend and i were having a lot of issues in the beginning. like, a lot. ultimately i felt like we were in compatible even though we had a lot of love for each other. so as the last straw, we decided to do a performance to prevent plan and it worked out really well. we do weekly retrospectives we check in with each other at the end of each week to see how we're doing. >> sean: all right, amber. would you do this? >> i think this young man better run for his dear life! i mean, what self-respecting person would stay in such a condescending relationship like this? to me, this is part of a larger trend i have noticed among gen

z-ers where they are obsessed with treating every relationship like a business transaction. "this person is not giving enough, you have to cut them out of your life." that's not how humans work and that's not how relationships work. >> sean: amber, charlie was getting a little red in the face because he's been part of the performance improvement plan, because he's been married for 23 years. and that's what his wife does to him every week! >> it's 23 years of the performance improvement plan. honestly! if you approach, whether it's a relationship or marriage, if you approach it like you are the hr department at your company, you are screwed. it's not going to work. what is the secret to a long marriage? is a short memory. you remember all the good things, and you forget all the bad things. it's that simple, right? >> sean: it is. amber, i agree with you, he should get out and get out fast. charlie, we have seen something called quiet quitting trending recently. now there's a new game in town. watch this.

>> you fight the urge to check your email. you do all five steps of your skincare routine and make your coffee. he used to hate mondays, but know you love him. he started doing this thing called bare minimum monday, to change a relationship to the beginning of the week. instead of starting work right of a, e do things for yourself. it's bare minimum monday, remember? >> sean: your wife says he practices five days a week. they go yes. every day is bare minimum mo monday. honestly, these kids are young. they are right out of school. this is their first job. can you imagine going after your first job and not wanting to save the world or do some spectacular thing or whatever it is? if this is where you are starting out, where do you think you're going to be in 20 years? how miserable are you going to be in a meaningless job in ten years, or 20 years down the line? you are hopeless if this is where you are starting at. >> sean: charlie has a good

point, amber. tiktok is run by china. china is feeding these feeds to our kids. "it's okay, be lazy, don't go to work until noon on monday." but they telling the chinese kids to work 16 hours a day, seven days a week. >> that's right, they are fostering this ideology of laziness and doing the bare minimum. but i will say, i have to give speefifteen a little bit of credit on how creatively have come up with different words for "lazy." be one generation tiktok have found a way to prevent their luggage from being stolen by sam brinton. watch this. stick a ship a box to disney for $28 instead of paying a checked baggage fee, and here's how it went. look at everything i was able to fit into this box, and it's only going to cost me another $28 to ship it back. best money spent ever. >> sean: amber, good idea? >> i would say given the track record of the u.s. postal

system, probably not. i'm going to give gen z-ers a great tip. put an air tag in your luggage and you will always know where it is. you don't have to worry about the airline lying to you about whether it's in bangkok or te texas. i am a beginning at 13 years compared to gen z but i still have a few tricks up my sleeve. it's going good hack. charlie, what say you? >> i've got to defend them on this one. i think this is a pretty smart move. i learned this from my father, who used to travel a lot for his work, and he would box up all of his dirty clothes, if he was gone for a couple of weeks. he would b box of all his cloths and ship them home to mom, and mom would wash them and ship them back to him. i'm not making that up that up. >> sean: that's unbelievable. one last take. i don't know if you heard of these disney adults, but it's another thing dividing the internet. my gosh. ♪ hey now, he now ♪ ♪ this is what dreams are made of ♪

♪ hey now, hey now ♪ ♪ ♪ >> sean: charlie, quick ans answer? >> we are doomed. it's over. >> sean: amber? >> this one is actually sad. this is clearly indicative of people who are very emotionally stunted, and i actually feel quite bad for them. >> sean: pre-woke disney, i loved it. i never had that reaction when i went to the park, but some, god bless them. charlie and amber come appreciate it. what does biden really think about visiting the people of east palestine? will explain next.

went from losing a job to being in a hotel room because i didn't have that credit. with creditrepair.com, it was, "hey, we can come together. this is what we're going to do," kind of thing. get started at creditrepair.com.

right now. [ applause ] [ applause ] happy friday, i am in for greg. let's welcome tonight's guests. here we go. [ applause ] >> he looked any younger, he would be sitting