>> tucker: that is it for us tonight, tomorrow night we will have more on what actually happened on the capitol on january 6. our conversation, an extended version of our conversation wit russell brand. have the best night with the ones you love, we will see you tomorrow. ♪ >> sean: welcome to hannity. january 6 is now dominating the news cycle all over the country. in washington, democrats, capitol hill and others, seething with rage, but per usual, they're not telling the whole story. they or omitting a critical element of that fateful day. how did writer news breach one of the most important buildings and one of the most fortified cities in america on a day when

the vice president and almost every lawmaker was inside and when everybody knew there was going to be a rip a rally expected at the capitol that day . coming up tonight, the person serving as the capitol police chief on january 6 will join us and help answer that question. it's a truly important question as they said at the time, the january 6 committee, they had t predetermined outcome to go after donald trump and bludgeon him as much as possible bird that's why congressman jim jordan, congressman jim banks were off the committee, they were kicked off the committee and only members that impeached delmo trump were allowed on the committee. not exactly a fair committee. democrats are not interested in learning how that capital was breached, why security failed s badly, but here is the saddest part to me in it should be the whole country. that is this whole saw god is

the. key and important information that we know about intelligence that they had that was being ignored in the lead up to january 6. they should have come up with a comprehensive security plan to ensure this could never ever happen again like securing a perimeter kind of like at the white house they have those concrete barriers that prevent you from getting on 1600 pennsylvania avenue and they have the big rot iron fencing, we should all agree on this point, this is not a political point, protecting our institutions like our capital and every elected official and needs to be a top priority of the democrats and others politicizing something in this case, donald trump was the only thing that seem to matter to that committee. you don't have to take my word for it, to their credit, even nbc news pointed out all of thi during a report this year. little late, but they pointed i

out for it good for them. >> and nbc news exclusive, the generous six committee final report more than 800 pair pages but some material didn't make the cuts. including the failures of federal law enforcement leading up to the attack part. >> the chief investigator says the government could have prevented. >> have law enforcement agencie acting, do you believe the attack on the capital could've been successfully repelled chris . >> i think it had been a lot more effective had law enforcement taken an effective posture pair of. >> that intel was pretty specific, and it was enough in our view, for law enforcement t have done a better job securing the perimeter. law enforcement has a very direct role in contributing to certainly the failures, the security failures that lead to violence fred. >> people familiar state member downplayed that finding because they wanted to keep the finding

on former president trump. committee members dispute that. >> it was this an intelligence failure? >> it was not an intelligence failure. >> we had people breach line, w need backup. >> the fbi, the department of homeland security and other agencies did not act on the intelligence they had including this online threat forwarded to capitol police calling on thousands to go to washington and help storm the capital. in an statement to nbc needs, the fbi said that since all the info they had to the capitol police first. >> the january 6 committee with a predetermined outcome sadly. the security breakdowns from it reports even though they committee's own chief investigator found quote a lot of advanced intelligence about law enforcement, about carrying weapons, about the vulnerabilit of the capital, and quote the intel in advance was pretty specific and it was enough in

our view for law enforcement to have done a better job. security officials, washington, dc they know massive crowd will be gathering for a crowd just blocks away from the capital on generator six in the days and the weeks leading up to generat six, the fbi and other agencies were tracking what they described as a large value of intelligence showing violent agitators planning scheming and attack on our capital per the u.s. capitol. get a few hundred capitol polic were left to fend for themselve on a massive capital complex spanning multiple huge building with dozens of entrances and on one of the most important days of the year. the question is how on earth di this happen and how was this no that main focus of the committee ? they could have gone after trum

and dunn part of the job that mattered to be a frankly, is more important to prevent it from ever happening again. the police chief capital at the term was baking for the help before the riots. according to him, his request o the national guard were rejecte or delayed separate times. watch this. >> i passed asked paul irving, he used the term objects, what' interesting is i'm on the phone with the pentagon begging for that national guard to deploy, the lieutenant general is using the term objects i'm concerned of the optics of the military standing in line at the capitol and the background. they are using the same term, when you see the intelligence now that was out there, you are just dumbfounded by it. those are lessons we should hav learned from september 11th tha we still haven't learned by generate six to eight intelligence was treated completely different on january 6 and is normally in

washington, dcp ricky optics, could there be a worse object than what we signed generate six ? and on such an important day wh take the risk? protecting the vice president, our, but instead of digging int the security failures, democrat conducted multiple investigations and of course their impeachment in a january committee that focused almost solely on donald trump and now there is no plan to prevent thi from ever happening again very because of there anti- trump rage, they're not even able to conduct a serious investigation into a riot they have been obsessing about for more than two years and no safety measure have been put in place. hypocritical and dangerous especially from a group of people who never seem to care about the riots, this was political bludgeoning for them.

we all remember for example the summer of 2020, 574 violent riots that summer, democrats either told you nothing or as they ignored them or they slide to you you they were mostly peaceful. we have dozens of dozens americans, we had injured cops that were hit with rocks, bottles, molotov cocktails, we sought looting and arson on a massive scale, property damage. zero investigations from democrats in congress. no investigation into high-ranking politicians like kamala harris that were out there supporting veil funds for the people involved in these activities. they were pushing the just man nobel laws a police department spread they did nothing as a federal courthouse was lit on fire import went over in over i

over again. there wasn't one committee put together to look into those 574 riots. they ignore the riot at the white house, where secret service officers were attacked you may recall and the presiden was forced to evacuate that night to bunker. most americans deplore all violent riots. the condemned january 6 in real-time on my radio show, mos americans want our elected officials regardless of what their party affiliation is to b safe and protected. this needs to transcend politics . you would think this is something that democrats and republicans should be protectin together. that would also include supreme court justices. they should be protected, there are laws against people protesting in front of there homes, but we are not enforcing those laws. many democratic politicians of violent riots is a political opportunity because they think they can rally their base or

they certainly don't want to alienate their base. that's why they're focused on very real security capitals on january 6 or maybe it's because a prominent democrat is to blam for those security failures. according to the former capital police chief the house sergeant and arms, turn down his nationa guard request prior to january because quote i will never get this by pelosi perry joining us with more, the author of the grant brand-new book is called courage under fire former capital police chief is with us. sir, thank you for being here, number one. i am sorry what happened to you your fellow officers that day. it breaks my heart rate a lot o my family has been in love enforcement, when any law enforcement officer is hurt, i will let you tell your story, how many times in total do you recall requesting the national guard?

>> thank you for having me on tonight and i appreciate you talking about the jane 2020 riots coming up to january 6 grade there was a number of request, i went on january 3rd requesting that national guard from paul irving, that was the first request for the national guard, i then went to my sergeant norms, paul irving is politically appointed by speake pelosi. he initially when i asked for the national guard on generate third which was a sunday was th first day of the new congress h said specifically quote i don't like the optics. and besides the intelligence didn't support it. 's concern for the optics i think goes is back to pelosi decision or statement that she recorded to federal agents and on the streets of america is storm troopers. i think she just didn't want th look of storm troopers on the hill. then come january 6 i think wha your viewers don't realize is the restrictions i have with th

chief of police. and one of the only chief and the united states that has a federal law passed by members o congress that prevents me from hauling in any federal resource either in advance like a try to do on generate third or even while under attack without goin and getting politically appointed sergeant sergeant and arms approval. at 12:53 we are attacked and i' watching my officers getting beaten. i pick up the phone at 12:55 they are our partner agency right next door in then at 12:58 i call paul irving, speaker pelosi's appointment to the board and tell them it's really bad. >> sean: to interrupt you, is the speaker of the house in charge of security on the capital? >> you have the quickly appointed capital police board in place by the sergeant-at-arm has put in place by pelosi coming up the senate sergeant arms put in place by the senate leadership. and then you have the architect of the capital put together by the president.

you have three voting members, am a nonpolitical appointed nonvoting member and that is ho the case security oversight works great it was paul irving who immediately set them going to run it up the chain. i will never forget that. his chain of command ends at speaker pelosi. i had to wait 71 minutes to get approval before i could finally reach out and start calling in federal assistance. 71 minutes where my men and women fought heroically to protect the capital from being penetrated. it took a deep minutes before the first window was broken. ticket let me go back a little bit. it was a number of days out of january 6, and the issue of the national guard first came up. you had not seen enough intelligence that had convinced you that you would need the guard at that time. within a day or two later, my understanding is that new intelligence came in that alarmed you to such a degree

that you felt you would absolutely need the guard to, you would need other law enforcement help for the capita police. is that the timeline? is that an accurate timeline? gate that's actually not how it played out. the morning of january 3rd, i went to see paul irving to request the national guard. the final intelligence assessment didn't come out unti the evening of january third, i was pretty much reviewed on the fourth, but you have to understand that intelligence assessment didn't indicate the level of threat we now know existed. this significant threat that wa out there, the fact that the fb was tracking 18 domestic terrorist suspects that were coming to the capital. and my intelligence unit on the fourth, fifth, and six put out intelligence saying low probability of civil disobedience. my deputy chief and insistent chief even had me approve,

recommended approval for the permits that were taking place on capitol grounds. most of those came through on the fourth. here we are on the fifth, we've got big video call with all the heads of intelligence, law enforcement agencies calling me as well as military leadership in dc and no one is bringing an alarms about the intelligence. my request for the national guard is based on the law enforcement experience. i knew we were going to have th vice president up on the hill a well as voice joint sessions of congress in place and it was going to take a lot of my staffing. i knew i didn't have significan staffing for the perimeter so i wanted the national guard to help stand on the perimeter. >> sean: let me ask you this, because i played in full that nbc news report that our top la enforcement agencies, our top intelligence agencies had information about people plotting, planning, and schemin

and attack for that day, in other day in other words, they knew this was a real clear and present danger, yet there were no reinforcements sent to you. it seems like they left you hanging out there to dry in retrospect, hearing that, what does that mean to you? >> i find that concerning. having done numerous events i'v done numerous operations and i've never seen intelligence handled this way before, usuall the fbi would do a briefing a joint intelligence bulletin, would call and do a video, a conference call. none of that occurred. now we find out dhl's failed to share information. our now there they had until their final assessment. >> sean: what did you think of the mayor declining calling up

the guard under any circumstances until she said it was okay. by that point it was way too late? >> a find that concerning i fin that concerning the memorandum put in place, but i think the mayor letter goes hand-in-hand with let speaker pelosi didn't want to see, the storm troopers out on the streets, so it tied our hands that day. looking back at the way we started to talk about the of th january 6 committee. the restrictions i had as they chief, and ask yourself why the january 6 committee never requested that i come in publicly testify. i am the chief of the capitol police, to have me come and testify because i think they were concerned it would begin t show what's on on the six, what went on in the days leading up to the six and what was the involvement of political leadership. >> sean: this is a story that

should have been highlighted an frankly should have had more security measures in place immediately. that should be a top priority. do you agree with the last part? i have to run. >> i absolutely agree so. >> sean: my condolences for the loft loss of life that day, thank you for being here. clearly the january 6 committee did nothing to improve security at the capital. it was more of a weekly group session my next guest was originally selected to be on th committee but nancy pelosi wouldn't let him warm jim banks be honest, i guess he didn't hate donald trump enough and of course government waste and abuse goes long for jordan is now investigating the ftc for targeting a private citizen in this case elon musk they reportedly demanded that twitte turned over at the musk communications because they are

very angry with how he is running his company. here with more, chairman of the judiciary committee. you were kicked up the january committee and replaced, you and jim banks were replaced by liz cheney and adam kinzer guard, all people who voted to impeach trump. do you believe as the police chief just outlined, that we missed serious intelligence and since this day, we missed an opportunity to build in protections that should have been put in place long before? >> i think they chief had it exactly right when he said they were concerned about the optics. the chief was exactly right wit why they had that concern. as you pointed out, what happened the entire summer of 2020, the democrat said it was peaceful protest, peaceful protest in portland were for 10 days the salted the federal courthouse there. with that backdrop it's hard to do the right thing and make sur the capital is protected with

additional law enforcement in the national guard. i believe that's why nancy pelosi didn't do it and we had what happened and what took place that day that occurred because it wasn't the proper posture wasn't there to make sure the capital was protected. gate we have every indication that this had all those information and they chose not to highlight it, is true? >> at think they sort of kept i from everyone. this is a committee that went after president trump, since he first ran in 2016 they were out to get impaired we knew with this committee was about but i think they wanted too ignore that and not see that part i think that's why she kept herself on the committee becaus there was a story speaker mc carthy said jim and i are going to be on the committee. it's a story that pelosi is fin with the selection in than we started talking about this very issue and that term optics that

they were concerned about in th next thing, she says no, we're not going to let them off. to get let's talk a little bit about this elon musk investigation going on. you can explain it better than me. >> the ftc called up a letter t a private company and ask them what journalist, who in the press are you talking to. this may be the most egregious threat to the first amendment i have ever seen. this started when elon musk bought the company. at thing 12 lead letters and th span of 12 months. the most egregious part is the idea that they are going after journalist greatly name personally some journalist. two of the individuals are goin to be testifying in front of ou committee on thursday. so when you're saying what happened to jim baker one of th ask questions they ask elon musk , who are these journalist, these are the fort names we know . let's have you journalists, i

don't know that i have ever see this kind of attack on first amendment freedom of the press like we see in what the ftc is doing. >> sean: make sure i understand this. you will now investigate the ftc , they are targeting a private citizen, his pictures o the screen, elon musk, demandin that twitter turn over his private communications because they are angry with him, how he's running the company and al of the journalist that he hired. >> to the bottom of what actually happened as it relates to the censorship issue of the hunter biden laptop? now the want to punish them for doing that? could get that you are absolutely right. they want to know every single communication he has had, who his comedic aid with cam, who has talked about him, and they want to go after the press brak if this doesn't that

weaponization of government, i don't know what is. to get you will get to the bottom of it starting on thursday? >> it has, fbi told twitter to lot certain feeds and now the ftc comes in and says who are the journalist you were talking about the feeds that the fbi told you to block. that is exactly with going on pretty cute that sounds pretty chilling. coming up, we will bring you th latest on the tragic story of four americans kidnapped at the border, to did not survive. still vent stephen miller they wait in on the endless border crisis madness. that is straight ahead. this isn't just freight. these aren't just shipments. they're promises. promises of all shapes and sizes.

each, with a time and a place they've been promised to be. a promise is everything to old dominion, because it means everything to you.

♪ >> sean: in a statement the fbi confirmed two of the four

americans kidnapped at the us-mexico border last friday ar dead. while the other to our receivin medical treatment and the u.s. after the news broke our own peter ducey pressed on the very weak border policy during today's white house press briefing. once again, she laughably claimed that the border safety is a top priority for this administration. i don't think so. to get now americans are being slaughtered. president biden is taking a approached, if it was al qaeda or isis operating just across the border from an american cit see. >> the president take this very seriously bring the fbi and other agencies have been on top of this since day one. when it comes to american lives in it comes to the safety of americans, the president will always make sure that is a top priority.

>> republican lawmakers refusin to stay silent, senator lindsey graham issued this turn warning to the cartels in the mexican government last night per. >> i'm going to introduce legislation to make certain mexican drug cartels foreign terrorist organizations under u.s. law to protect america fro being by things coming out of mexico. what would i would tell the mexican government if you don't clean up your act, we're going to clean it up for you. >> how many times has this administration lied to you, the american people, lied to all of us telling us the border is secure. here is a quick reminder. >> look, it is way down now. we've got it under control. >> the border is closed. >> nor could i have been clearer , and continue to be so, which is that the border is closed for a.

>> the united states will continue too enforce our laws and secure our border. >> at the border, we are workin to make the border more secure. >> the border is secure. >> we have a secure border and that is a priority for any nation including ours and our administration. do you agree the border is secure. >> former white house aide stephen miller, this is right o the brownsville border, what bothers me is we had in the first to years of the biden administration and already the month of january this year were on pace to set another record o illegal immigrants crossing int this country illegally. and to that, fennel, heroin, methamphetamine, cocaine, human trafficking, how did they say with a straight face that they are on top of this issue and

that our border is secure because it clearly is not freight if they want to tell that to the families of the fou people kidnapped, two families that lost loved ones, i don't think they'd have the courage t ever do that. he could thank you for having m on. wearers very saddened to have t americans lose a lives into others injured in mexico. we've already seen this kind of violence i was glad to see pete ducey asked what we would do if we had al qaeda and ice is just across the rio grande in mexico because that glad to hear lindsey graham say he will introduce a bill to introduce them as terrorist organizations. i did that in the 116th congress , i'm going to go ahead and do it tomorrow in the 118th congress because we should recognize the danger they pose to the american people. is that as it is today with the tragic loss of these lives, wha about the 70 to thousand dead americans from fennel poisoning in the last fiscal year?

what about the four families that lost their lives to fennel poisoning. what about the almost 1,000 dea migrants found on trances branches or in the rio grande river or the three who died in the texas heat last august, where is the ministrations compassion? where are the churches and the ngos down at the rio grande river with the compassion patting themselves on there bac for being pro- migrant when all those migrants are dying. no more words, and republicans ought to hold the line on this. we ought to designate them as a terrorist and we ought too withhold funding until we get this ministration to do their job and secure the border. >> we had to secure border we had a state in mexico policy, w build hundreds and hundreds of miles of border wall, we didn't quite get to the end. but, we had nothing like this i the trump years as a matter fac we had the lowest numbers of

illegal immigrants entering the country in those years. joe biden to me is aiding and abetting the lawbreaking. he's allowing it to happen. we know how to stop this and prevent this. why is he not doing that? could get to your point, in 2020 , we had a policy of complete and total removal, any illegal immigrant from any country anywhere in the world that came across our border illegally they were either sent to mexico and remain in mexico they were sent to guatemala or they were sent or returned to there home country. there was zero releases of aliens into our country per joe biden came into office and he terminated every single policy just mentioned and began the process of resettling illegal immigrants by the millions into our country per he is a human smuggler, he is a human

trafficker, and he is the singl best financial assets that cartels have. now we see the bloodshed that h has rot, we see the suffering h has brought. we see the death he has wrought and this is on his hands in the hands of every single politicia in washington who supports joe biden's policies brickey after the election, chuck schumer sai he wants amnesty for each and every one. chip, i will give you the last word on this and this is that i would even argue that illegal immigrants getting preferential treatment, they didn't have a vaccine mandate in the middle o a pandemic. they had kids in cages, the media didn't say a word bird then we have the biden phone issue and track free transportation to any one of th 48 states in the continental u.s. that is aiding, abetting, and assisting. if i do it when i get arrested, you're a lawmaker. >> no question. what we've got now is encounter

and release is the official policy of the united states because of joe biden. as a result, americans are dyin and americans are dying. it would simply say when she go somebody here, you've got too detain them to adjudicate an asylum claim or you have to tur them away. the same things we've been doin over title 42. yet democrats completely agains it. almost every republican support it, but there are a few that ar kind of hemming and hawing and wringing their hands. the american people said we insisted we do something about this. >> a different topic, chip clement will all 220 to republican house members unite on a plan on the debt ceiling that they agree on or will they know, will they separate becaus i think the democrats have calculated politically that the republicans won't unite. you believe they will?

>> as you know, you and i have been talking about this, we are working on this hard. it is difficult, but keep it simple. let's return spending to pre- covid levels and get the break the woke weapon eyes federal government that is going after the federal people. we can do that if we unite. >> that would work for most americans and conservatives. straight ahead, senator josh hawley has introduced legislation to the extensive covid cover-up and hold china and the ccp accountable. he is here and he will explain as we continue. glad you're with us. not coughing? hashtag still not coughing?! mucinex dm gives you 12 hours of relief from chest congestion and any type of cough, day or night. mucinex dm. it's comeback season.

♪ >> sean: last week josh hawley

introduced legislation to declassify all of the intelligence related to covid 19 , the bill unanimously passed the senate in a vote is now scheduled for a houseboat this friday, the bad news is it's ba news for doctor flip-flop fauci he once initiated a publication to disprove the wuhan lab theor in then decided that as an independent voice of evidence disproving the lab leak. meanwhile today he introduced additional legislation aimed at curbing china's influence by banning chinese companies in cc linked entities from buying farmland, lance rand, land near military installations in the u.s. for it he joins us with th latest. let me start with what rights vote that took place in the senate last week, the vote in the house is friday.

that would be declassify any potential links between the wuhan virology lab in the origins of covid very don't we already know from internal e-mails, text messages et ceter in the nih that nih money went to the eco- health alliance to fund the wuhan virology lab and we knew they did research on coronavirus is and and and gain of function research. >> that is why the american people deserve too see what the year government knows about the origin of covid because we've had people like dr. feast fauci is that that couldn't have neve come from a elaborate if you think that you are a crazy conspiracy theorist. you shouldn't be allowed to sit and as it turns out are own government had known for some time that it likely came from elaborate. let's declassify them with the american people see everything

the government has got the origins of covid and let's hold people accountable for their lives. what about this memo that was created at the request of dr. fauci and now evidence suggesting that not only did dr but it's true he might have edited and rewritten parts of i and then quoted it as an independent source when in fact he was actively involved in it? is that true? >> i have seen the news reports i don't know if it's true that he was actively involved although the numbers report certainly suggest he was. he did cite it from the podium. what we do know is that fauci actively worked to discredited the idea that the fact that thi became from a lab. he actively worked to just credit that when our own

government was had intelligence to still suggest it did come from a lab appeared this is why we need to have the american people see it. no more interest to bureaucrats let the american people see for themselves. to get this was used as an independent source when he himself called for the original letter, i think that's an important point. senator, i want to ask about this, if i wanted to buy farmland and ranchland in china if i wanted to buy land in chin near their military installations, do you think i o any other american would be allowed to do so by the government of china? >> i highly doubt it. here's what i know phi and his corporations now own almost 340,000 acres of american farmland. listen, i come from a farm state . food security is national security. chinese corporations and people associated with the chinese communist party should not own any land as single acre of

american farmland. we need to protect our food security we need to protect our national security. my legislation would ban it across-the-board if that's what we need to do to. >> i think that is critical to our national security. i would say in light of the devastation of covid which came from china, i think it would be within our rights to claim eminent domain and take that limb back and not allow foreign entities or foreign nationals t be buying up farmland, ranchland , and land near military installations especially after the balloon incident. we will watch the legislation closely. after promising to be a president for all, he is abandoning red states americans and we will show you the latest kamala bizarre weird giggling moment. you don't want to miss that straight ahead.

christian health care ministries is an organization with over 40 years of trusted care who understands the importance of family. a group that sees you for who you are, regardless of your health history, offering values based affordable health care cost solutions. learn more today at yourchm.org about health care that puts you in control.

when a truck hit my car, the insurance company wasn't fair. i didn't know what my case was worth. so i called the barnes firm. i was hit by a car and needed help. i called the barnes firm, that was the best call i could've made. i'm rich barnes. it's hard for people to know how much their accident case is worth. let our injury attorneys help you get the best result possible. ♪ the barnes firm injury attorneys ♪ ♪ call one eight hundred, eight million ♪

>> despite saying he was going to be a president for all americans and biden will regularly. that includes the good people o holocene, ohio, they voted heavily for donald trump. he likely never will for her part, the giggling vice president kamala harris said sh has hated conservative since sh was a little child. take a look. >> in fact, i'm going to share with you a simple story was tha i went home wednesday and i sai why are conservatives bad, momm because i thought a waiver supposed to conserve.

i couldn't reconcile it. now i can. >> you know, all these different , different direction. oh i have puns on water. >> sean: why are conservatives bad come up mommy here with reaction, monica crowley and fo news contributor and monica, wh are conservatives bad, mommy? i asked a lot of questions as a kid, i think my parents wanted me to shut up i don't recall ever asking every anything even remotely that sounded like that question or ever giggling at that question like that. to keep the vice president tend to tall tale tall tales like he

boss. nobody knows whether or not the situation happen, but it does recall in the vice president ha repeatedly in the past total story that when she was a littl kid and she fell out of her stroller and she looked at her mother and said i want freedom. remember that story? she told these stories because she is trying to ingratiate herself with the audience and that very insecure nervous laughter, that is trying to generate as sympathetic respons from the because she is out of her depth, she's got imposter syndrome, and it shows all day long. if she was sick insecure oddball , but doing a good job, nobody would care about these stories. she is an insecure oddball who is terrible at her job and by being so inapt and just so out of her depth in this position. that's what the american people are really mad about we can laugh at these videos of her al

day long, but the american people are really angry that we are in this position of having president who doesn't know what time it is and of vice presiden you is an insecure oddball. >> i have my doubts whether or not that question really happened that which he describe really happened, why are conservatives bad, mommy? i don't know. i just don't know why young children would ever come up wit a question like that. the question, the real point is there is a belief among the har left that if you are a conservative, if you are a republican, you are bad person. it's like they don't have a heart, soul, a content spread. >> wright, ng is appealing not to the majority of americans, she is appealing to her base, 2

lives matter, the progressives in the democratic party, that's all she speaking for parity doesn't speak for the majority of america. her association with joe biden, they have developed this patter to lie every day about their upbringing, the lifestyle, thei experiences, it is so absolutel true. when you talk about joe biden a the top of the segment, they have an affirmative obligation to go to ohio. he is 30 days too late. president trump trumped him there and basically he was goin to be a unifier. remember his inauguration speech ? he has refused to go there because ohio represents the heartland of america, not the 3 doing a good job. maybe he could turn air force one around on the weekend

instead of going to delaware an go to ohio. i don't think he'll do that,. >> i only have ten seconds of each of you, i believe at some point probably soon, people of east palace dean will be told the air, the water, is safe to breathe and drink. i don't believe them, i would want an outside entity to confirm. you think that will happen? get no. i think you're right, i don't think they will ever learn the truth, just like the social of transparency. i don't think they will get the truth from the government. >> just after 9/11 when the epa and the government told everybody and the ark in the environment that it was all okay . that was alive, and i expect th same thing is happening here. >> leo, thank you. monica, thank you. more hannity after this.

before we go tonight, i will

be hosting live studio audience show for the rest of the week that starts tomorrow. if you want to be apart of the audience go to hannity.com, absolutely free. all the information on how to sign up is there. i hope you will join us. that's all the time we have left. please dvr so you will never miss an episode. in the meantime, laura ingraham, is next. you and me, time hall, we'll do one together. what do thank you think? >> absolutely. >> me, you, and tucker all do one. >> i proposed that before. i think we'll have that. have you seen what they're doing to elon musk? i just saw this cross about the ftc going after him and internal communications, journalists information, where are the journalists today? unbelievable. that'sen