i heard about the payroll tax refund, it allowed us to keep the amount of people that we needed and the people that have been here taking care of us. see if your business may qualify. go to getrefunds.com. >> hello, everyone, i'm alicia acuña along with joe concha, big story tonight former president trump's unprecedented arrangement less than 48 hours away. at this time tomorrow trump is expected to be in new york ahead of the hearing and here is how tuesday will shake out. at 11:00 a.m. he will arrive at the courthouse will trump will be fingerprinted and

photographed and then trump flies back to mar-a-lago where he will speak publicly about the indictment against him. his attorney making this bombshell today. >> we will look at every potential issue that we will be able to challenge and we will challenge it and, of course, i very much anticipate a motion to dismiss coming because there's no law that fits this. alicia: the details of the indictment are typically under seal before the arrangement takes place but there are reports that trump will face as many as 34 charges. >> if the charges are exclusively along the lines of the reporting before i came on, it'll be a class e felony and there is an upward range that involves prison and downward range that involves no prison whatsoever. so that's what we have to wait and see. really only district attorney bragg knows what the evidence

is. alicia: so if the charges are related to the hush money scandal, trump's legal team and many others including former attorney general bill barr say that doesn't amount to a campaign finance violation. >> the case act has illegal basis. pursuing on somebody -- there's nothing inherently wrong or illegal about making a hush payment. they are saying he falsified the corporate record but for that to even be a misdemeanor you have to be trying to defraud somebody and it's unclear exactly who was defrauded. this is his own company. from the federal standpoint, the idea that this was a campaign finance violation is simply wrong, it's wrong on the law. alicia: so we will expand on this idea of intent to defraud and andy, i will go to you on this because this is a really important point. >> yeah, it sure is. the way -- most people i think especially nonlawyers you would say if the charge is falsifying business records rand they have

something in there that does not represent the reality of the business transactions, isn't that falsifying business records? but that's not how we read statutes. this statute aside from saying causing something to be fault, also has the added element where it says you have to have on intent to defraud. so it's not enough to just show that there's something in the records that's false, you have to in addition as the prosecutor prove beyond all reasonable doubt that there was an intention by doing the false entry to commit a fraud. i don't think it's all that different from, you know, in federal cases which we talked about a lot over the years, you know, it's not enough in a false statement's case to make a false statement, right, we have the whole thing about materiality, you to show that not only that it was false but it had some threat of importance to the investigation. here in the state what they are essentially saying it's not enough to just have a false

entry, you to show that he was trying to commit a fraud. so what will happen in the case is the federal government as it typically does will have to try to have expansive interpretation of what fraud means so it'll be like anything that you can do that would be deceptive which almost gets you to the point if it's false, then it's fraud, right, and the defense will want a more common sense interpretation of what fraud is which is you're trying to basically get money or property out of -- out of someone or something. there's no allegation here that anybody has heard of before that the trump organization or trump himself created tax evasion or prolonged financial gain out of this. so they would want that interpretation of fraud. >> his team has been making the point as they have been making the rounds. again, we haven't seen the indictment and everybody is waiting for that but we have heard quite a bit about it

through our own reporting and other agencies as well knows there's likely 34 charges, right, and take a listen to what alan dershowitz says -- had to say, he's accusing someone in maybe the da's office or grand jury likely leaking information about the indictment. listen. >> never in the history of america has anybody ever paying for an nda done that and never in the history of america has anybody ever been indicted for not doing that. i don't think any right-thinking person will tell you that this indictment would have occurred but to the fact that the man's name is donald trump. not that he's a past president but that he's a potentially future president running against the head of the party, the democrats, it's very likely that the reason we know about this indictment and how come we know about it, it hasn't -- hadn't been made public is because somebody either in the da's office or in the grand jury probably leaked this which is a

more serious felony. as far as i know there's been no investigations of the leak. alicia: concha, i will two to you. fair point? >> fair point. molly knows this from her book. leaks out of the fbi about certain allegations against donald trump. we have andy mccabe fired for leaking to the wall street journal. now he has a cushy in cnn. when you hear 34 counts, boy, andy that sounds omnibus. if this case fails, jonathan turley, almost every legal analyst on tv even other networks that don't like trump very much say this is a weak case. does have it have any impact on the georgia case, for example, because once you fail here in

court opinion it looks like you're going after the guy until something sticks? >> every criminal trial is a jury trial. there's what the law says and getting the jury unanimously to agree it's been proved beyond all reasonable doubt. trump's approach to all these cases is going to be that the democratic party as it has been doing since 2016 when the law enforcement and intelligence apparatus of the government was put in the service of the hillary clinton campaign, they are going to say this is just the next chapter of it and that they are using their federal government power in a partisan fashion to go after someone that they regard as their arch nemesis. that's a powerful argument if they play into it by bringing a very weak case that turns out to fall flat. >> it's interesting, seems so much like the first impeachment trial of president trump, right, where you knew the ending. the senate wasn't going to vote two-thirds of it anyway to remove the president. it was all about fomenting chaos

and to bring a very negative light around donald trump by impeaching him. i just feel like this is the same way. it'll eventually fail but winning the case isn't the goal, weakening trump may be the goal. >> the big question right now also is will this even go to trial and if that happens what will that look like. today james, former attorney for the president -- former president says that he doesn't believe a b gag order will happ, listen. >> i don't think it's going to happen. you're talking about one of the reasons he's being politically persecuted is he's running as president for somebody that unleashes doj against the election season. i think it would be very difficult for a judge to impose a gag order to a person running for president. you are talking about having profound effect in the country, a gag order would do that just. alicia: mollie, he makes the point, particularly difficult that it'll be former president

trump. mollie: absolutely. we saw when various people were indicted. it did make it difficult to talk about it. in this case it's good that they say it's unlikely to have it happen but why so many people are bothered about this not just that former president trump is a former president or the charges seem trumped up but also he's currently far and away the top -- top person in the republican primary for running for the next presidency and he has tons of support, you know, more than half of the republican voters are already saying that they are behind him. he raised like 4, $5 million in the 48 hours after the indictment was leaked or it was announced and so this is something that is a lot about election tampering. we cared so much during the russia collusion hoax, the thing where hillary clinton falsely claimed that it was legal expenses that -- where she spent millions to create the russian collusion hoax, that it was a legal expense. during that period of time, you know, we had so many problems

here with election interference, this is massive election interference. >> could i just add to what mollie is saying about this. every day we are going to have something like this because they decided to intrude law enforcement into politics into what seems to be a flimsy basis. the proposition that a court can tell not just the lawyers who it controls as a member of the bar, right, but the litigants that they have to stay silent about what's going on in the case is a very dicey proposition onto the first amendment and almost never done in most cases. so the thought that you would not only cross that robukon but do it in connection with a guy who is running for president and as mollie, the leading contender at least for now on one side it's mindboggling but it's what we are going to get every day as we are in this crazy land. >> here we are. here we are. okay, well, we will move on.

coming up is the biden administration taking a page from bugs bunny's playbook? >> turn off that light. alicia: when you'll be told exactly what lightbulb you'll have to use in your home plus it's joe versus joe as the fight between the president and the senator intensifies. that's in the case. ♪ ♪ ♪ we provide nutrients to support immune, muscle, bone, and heart health. yaaay! woo hoo! ensure with 25 vitamins and minerals and ensure complete with 30 grams of protein. ♪

the new chase ink business premier card is made for people like sam who make...? ...everyday products... ...designed smarter. like a smart coffee grinder - that orders fresh beans for you. oh, genius! for more breakthroughs like that... ...i need a breakthrough card... like ours! with 2.5% cash back on purchases of $5,000 or more... plus unlimited 2% cash back on all other purchases! and with greater spending potential, sam can keep making smart ideas... ...a brilliant reality! the new ink business premier card from chase for business. make more of what's yours.

covid is still out there, and so are you. and you could be out there with fading protection but an updated vaccine restores your protection so you can keep doing you.

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ joe: welcome back to the big sunday show. senator joe manchin, however, is taking president biden to task over the electric vehicle tax credits in the inflation reduction act that the democratic senator says overemphasizes clean energy technology while not putting enough into domestic production of fossil fuels and as the wall street journal editorial board points out in the op-ed, quote, while the world isn't watching and the press corps isn't

regulators on friday are rewriting last year's inflation reduction act so more electric vehicles will qualify for subsidies, unquote. here senator man c -- manchin ox news sunday. >> i'm disappointed interpreting a piece of legislation that's not how it was written and not the intent and the agreement that president biden and i had. i'm hoping he intervenes. they want to put more money out and throw money from the treasury in credits that will not accelerate on how quickly we can be totally self-reliant. joe: andy, joe manchin talks about going down legal avenues here to stop this from happening. what legal avenues does he have in this situation? >> well, you know, he will go to court but, you know, i have to say it's really offensive to hear this 70-year-old guy who has been in politics forever, democratic politics forever saying he's shocked, shocked and

this was exactly the intent. he totally knew this was the intent. wooled told him in the commentary from this side stay strong, inclination was against this because this was exactly the intent and the democrat playbook is, write omnibus legislation that we have to pass it in order to know what's in it, right, have all kinds of fussy terms in it and hand it over to the progressive bureaucracy to write regulations so that we meld it into what we want, not what it actually says. if manchin is shocked by that, i would have guessed that he wrote that textbook rather than he suddenly surprised that they're implementing. joe: precisely. mollie, i recently wrote a piece talking about ronald reagan with his embrace of compromise and if they didn't get along and heated words after work they got together for a drink. reagan agreed to tax cuts -- tax

decreases and if democrats reduce spending, i will reduce to tax increases. he agrees to it but like a hostage situation where you pay for the hostage and then democrats reneged on the whole cutting on spending thing. this is the same situation. to andy's point, joe manchin is he really that gullible that he thought that they would keep their word on this. mollie: as difficult as it was we are in raw much worse situation because of the democratic party has base that's becoming per radical. so when the bill was passed, we actually heard all sorts of great things how it's going to help domestic energy production, the bill does an inflation reduction act. that's how the media spun it and democrats spun it and campaigned on that, i completely agree with andy that the naive from joe manchin here is alarming and difficult to accept.

he is very angry, you can see that. he think that is the bureaucracy went much further and everything explained on why he would do this bill was taken away. >> charlie brown got angry when lucy kept pulling the football. one more time. >> let's hear from the coalition of free market and consumer groups, okay, this is a letter to the energy department, this is in 2022. quote, when led's are more efficient and generally longer lasting than bulbs they cost more and inferior for certain functions like dimming. and here is the thing, right, this is not being reported in any way, shape or form. we are not seeing it. we are talking about the lightbulb ban here.

consumers want a choice. that's on the press, correct? alicia: you're exactly right there. this is important. it's a big deal as this eva decision that was made on friday. that's also a big deal and people aren't hearing about it and when they feel to use your analogy, it's like charlie and the football being taken away. these things affect our daily lives and daily decisions. this isn't some far away piece of lawmaking work that i can't relate to. this is something that everybody can relate to. >> absolutely. the whole thing about banning stuff. we hear about gas stoves that may go away. in california by 2035 they will only sell electric cars in that state and my home state of new jersey as well and now lightbulbs as well. the biden administration months ago in august talked about banning lightbulbs and here her that may be happening, what is the end game here?

mollie: we had backtrack on the trump administration and now back on and rages me by the way because i'm sensitive to light and i find led lights to cause headaches but more than that, we you're exactly right. the idea that bureaucrats get to tell you how to cook your food and light your home is so deeply un-american and we need much more pushback. >> it's the worst part of it, they are unelected bureaucrats and what we now have, we have a constitution based on separation of powers, representative government, what we have transformed to is government by executive order, fuzzy, fuzzy statutes that get past overred to the bureaucracies that can rewrite them and everything happens in court where they get decided issues get decided by unelected rogue lawyers. i mean, that's america today. joe: the reality of it all,

$60,000, expensive and with lightbulbs as well. it all gets passed to us. congratulations. you know, they haven't seen the interview. that's next. ♪ ♪ ♪

have you ever considered getting a walk-in tub? well, look, no further! safe step's best offer, just got better! now, when you purchase your brand new safe step walk-in tub, you'll receive a free shower package. yes, a free shower package! and if you call today, you'll also receive 15% off your entire order. now you can enjoy the best of both worlds! the therapeutic benefits of a warm, soothing bath that can help increase mobility, relieve pain, boost energy,

and even improve sleep! or, if you prefer, you can take a refreshing shower. all-in-one product! call now to receive a free shower package plus 15% off your brand new safe step walk-in tub. (woman) what would the ideal weight loss program look like? no hunger, no cravings, no isolation, more energy, lasting results, and easy. is that possible? it is with golo. these people changed their lives with golo without starvation dieting. whether you have 100 pounds to lose or want to shed those final 20, try golo for 60 days and never diet again. (uplifting music)

justin baker: across the globe, the vast majority of children with cancer will die. those children deserve so much better. the thing we are called to do is to make sure that those children are surrounded by people who know how to provide the very best care possible. >> welcome back to the big sunday show, liberals are in a full meltdown mode but over something that hasn't happened yet so what cued the liberal outrage, this clip 60 minutes posted on twitter. >> why did you agree to come onto 60 minutes? >> don't miss lesley stahl

interviewing marjorie taylor greene, new sunday. >> here is some of the outrage. msnb's ellie tweeting that legacy media is helping, quote, white supremacists, former republican congressman kissinger chimed in, quote, inshaken and british broadcaster and independent journalist anthony davis says both sides coverage is not journalism. she was lovely and fine and we had a nice conversation and we disagreed about stuff but, you know, no one got wept up about it, seems like forever ago. what has happened to our

discourse where the left apparently does not trust 60 minutes choose on organ of the left to into competent interview which even if they are fair to her you would think it's the thing the left would want. mollie: the idea that you would not interview marjorie taylor greene, millions of americans love her and she's been highly misinterpreted by the left. they have these ideas about who they think she is but very much at odds if you ever met her, she's a smart, capable person my only beef is that i think a lot of republicans frequently, republican members of congress, they go on the left-wing media programs and they are surprised when they are attacked or poorly portrayed. i hope that lesley stahl in 60

minutes does a fair job but republicans need to understand that so as the media have become and more propaganda ana differet posture than they did 30, 40 years ago. >> obviously they have to be prepared when they go in for what they are going to get but, alicia, why is it better to cancel than to confront, that's what i don't understand? you have your opponent there, you can ask them whatever you want to ask her and it's 60 minutes, right, they can slice and dice it, it's marjorie taylor greene is rolling the dice. >> people are complaining want the congresswoman challenged in a bigger and better way and what bigger and better way is there than 60 minutes? i say -- not that they need to hear from me. good for 60 minutes for doing this. marjorie taylor greene is someone who has agitated not just democrats and liberals but

some in the same party as well. that's what 60 minutes is here to do it. i want to watch it and see what happens. another thing, you never know how this is going to turn out. marjorie taylor greene is one of those people in congress that able to take something that could hurt them and turn it around and use it in her favor. >> joe, is this one of these things where once again seeing the uneven playing field, for example, i remember during the 2020 election, i thought democrats who were candidates in the race made a lot of points especially with independent voters when they would come on fox news and sit for interviews. >> precisely. >> is the left looking at that and saying, no, no, we are not letting you have that on our organs opinion. >> proecho chamber. both sides of journalism is not journalism. actually that is journalism completely. and i got to hear from people i used to respect like lester

holt, nbc news, no, we can't treat both sides the same way. it's amazing. look, 60 minutes has been on the air for more than 50 years. top 10 program. it's a great platform for marjorie taylor greene to go on and great place for 60 minutes to challenge her on x, y and z and as we see on college campuses over and over again, shutting down speech is the preferred option over more speech and we always should be for more speech, andy. >> well, okay. coming up the family tradition of having dinner together has been around for generations but is it going away? that's next. ♪ ♪ ♪

over 5 million people have fallen in love with a portable blender. blendjet 2 gives you ice-crushing, big blender power on-the-go. so you can throw in your favorite ingredients and blend up a delicious smoothie anytime, anywhere.

blendjet 2 even cleans itself. just add water, a drop of soap, recharge quickly with any usb port. ready to fall in love? order yours now on blendjet.com do you struggle with occasional nerve aches in your hands or feet? try nervivenerve relief from the world's #1 selling nerve care company. nervive contains alpha lipoic acid to relieve occasional nerve aches, weakness and discomfort. try nervivenerve relief. we got the house! you did! pods handles the driving. pack at your pace. store your things until you're ready. then we deliver to your new home - across town or across the country. pods, your personal moving and storage team.

mollie: welcome back to the big sunday show, family dinner has s been staple for decades and spend quality time with each other. >> the news is the children got through another year of school, fabulously, you got older, even though i told you not to especially you, stay young, don't leave me. you prepared us your famous chicken poisoning that we are excited to eat. just kidding. but the greatest thing it's my favorite part of the day with my four best friends. >> is the tradition dying? according to new research four in ten parents say they have 3 or fewer family dinners per week. i'm not surprised by this but i'm a bit saddened by it. my family actually does eat dinner together every night, maybe not both parents there because i'm working some evenings but we made a commitment early on that we would always have dinner together and i love that time with my family but with school,

schools, sports, schedules i'm not totally surprised. >> i am surprised because we have work from home environment now so why are we missing dinners exactly? i got it when my dad worked six dais a week and sometimes he wasn't home for dinner because he worked insane hours in an office. my friends and i, pre-covid anyway, when we used to go out to dinner we would put phones in the middle of the table, the rule whoever reaches for the phone first you are picking up the entire tab. you see people at restaurants literally texting each other across the table. come talk to each other. that's the way it works. with my kids are 7 and 9 and i see the addiction in terms of social media and ipads and youtube and tiktok and when we have dinner those things go away and we are going to talk about school and sports and their dinner and before you know it, they are going to be 18 and tout there. i'm trying to enjoy as much as i

can. >> there was the other interesting poll i saw in for wall street poll that americans have had decrease in how much they value different things, patriotism, religion was something that 62% americans of valued and down this year and even children, children are the best, 59% of people say they valued and that was very important in 1998 down to 30%. alicia, what you think about the numbers and what do they mean about our country and how we are holding it together? alicia: it's discouraging. it makes me kind of sad and going back to the dinners, maybe there's something to that with parents being so busy, kids being so busy, everyone is too busy to talk. in defense of some -- of the families that don't end up having dinner, that has happened to us a lot, before they started driving we had practices, games

and all of that and we were going to everything so that we were with our kids. we weren't necessarily at the table, so we were doing something for the family and i know that like their parents out there who are seeing, gosh, i have to try harder and we are trying so hard but it is -- it does saddened me to see that so many people don't want to have kids because families can be such a beautiful thing. >> how about the mccarthy family? >> well, decades into the last century when i was growing up in the bronx, we ate together. there were, you know, six kids, big family, small apartment in the bronx but that wasn't the only quality time, you know, it was -- you would watch prime time television at night it was an array of movies designed for families. just seems to me there was a lot more family activity and maybe that was reinforcing so that the idea that we all sat down and ate together wasn't

extraordinary and felt like you were part of a unit and i think what's frightening about this, you know, taking a step back and looking at it is in almost every aspect of life where we used to have a lot more communal time, people are encouraged to -- they're are almost stove pipe into their areas of interest. and they've lost the ties of communication that were like normal daily ones and drifted into a lot of dark places. i think in particular post-covid, one of the things that we are not addressing in this country is the loneliness and the frankly the mental problems that people are still recovering from with that. and i think a big part of that is that they don't feel that sense of community even in the family as they used to. >> one to have reasons why i think it's so important when you do sit down at a dinner table

you talk to your kids about how their day was and you can get a gage on how things are going and you also have usually healthier meals when you're eating home-cooked meals at the table and it absolutely has to do with so many problems that we have here but -- >> you see a correspondence here by the way, 1998 is not that long ago. it's not 1988. social media started to come about ten years later and i really think that that has profound impact. you can blame the kids you're on the ipad, on the phone too much, the parents sometimes lean on these things because that gets them a get away to not have to deal with their kids all of the time and that is very dangerous thing at the point. >> i had one like you were talking about where we went out with the hockey team, you know, the parents are sitting at one table and they're talking over pizza and the kids are at the other table, they have their phones out.

there's like four on each side and they are talking to each other. i saw one interaction, parent and kid, one kid was upset because he left the phone over in the car. how else can i talk to my friends? >> you're not getting -- >> let that be a lesson, smartphones are evil. straight ahead on the big sunday show, federal judges are teaching a lesson to protestors that ambushed conservative judge at the university, next. ♪ ♪ ♪ known as a passionate artist. known for loving the outdoors. known for getting everyone together. no one wants to be known for cancer, but a treatment can be. keytruda is known to treat cancer. fda-approved for 16 types of cancer, including certain early-stage cancers. one of those cancers is triple-negative breast cancer.

keytruda may be used with chemotherapy medicines as treatment before surgery and then continued alone after surgery when you have early-stage breast cancer and are at high risk of it coming back. keytruda can cause your immune system to attack healthy parts of your body during or after treatment. this may be severe and lead to death. see your doctor right away if you have cough, shortness of breath, chest pain, diarrhea, severe stomach pain, severe nausea or vomiting, headache, light sensitivity, eye problems, irregular heartbeat, extreme tiredness, constipation, dizziness or fainting, changes in appetite, thirst, or urine, confusion, memory problems, muscle pain or weakness, fever, rash, itching, or flushing. there may be other side effects. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions, including immune system problems, if you've had or plan to have an organ or stem cell transplant, received chest radiation, or have a nervous system problem. keytruda is an immunotherapy and is also being studied in hundreds of clinical trials, exploring ways to treat even more types of cancer. it's tru.

keytruda from merck. see all the types of cancer keytruda is known for at keytruda.com, and ask your doctor if keytruda could be right for you. ♪ sfx: [text notification] ♪ your prescription for... staying right where you are. ♪ ♪ your prescription for... the blue or white pill. ♪

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ alicia: welcome back to the big sunday show, order in the court, a pair of federal judges are taking action after stanford protestors ambushed one of their fellow judges, remember this? >> it's uncomfortable to say that for many people here your work has caused harm. my job is to create the space of belonging for all people in this

institution. this is actually part of the creation of belonging. >> judges jim hoe and elizabeth branch won't hire clerks from stanford. this applies to future students not currently enrolled law students. andy, obviously i'm going to go to you first. >> mollie wrote a good back, insanity of kavanaugh's confirmation and i was hoping that was the low moment and things have only gotten worse. when i first heard the judges were starting to do this, i -- the voice inside of me said, i wished they just do it and not talk about it because it'll, you know, this will become a thing, they'll be litigation and lawsuits but i think they actually have to say it because there has to be an open and notorious response to this to say that it's unacceptable. i don't know what we are raising

on these campuses but they are not lawyers, they are not going to be able to function in the world of the law where you actually have to have disputes where there's two sides to every story and they get worked out. that's like what we have lawyers for. so i think these judges are absolutely right. if your mindset is to cancel rather than confront, then you don't belong in the law. there's probably other places you go but that's not where you belong. alicia: this definitely is backfiring on future students and the dean involved in this also has been placed on leave but mollie, take a listen to what judge ho said in a speech to the texas review of law and politics. he said what some law schools tolerate and even encourage today is not intellectual exploration but intellectual terrorism. they engage in disruption, intimidation and public shaming. they try to terrorize people into submission and

self-censorship in a deliberate campaign to eradicate certain viewpoints from the public discourse. we were just talking about this two breaks ago. >> i think it's so interesting that judge ho has taken the brave stand and i think it's worth revisiting what happened here. judge dunkin is one of the most well respected federal judges out and spent life caring about civil liberties and when he was invited protestors said they wished his daughters would be raped. this is not the type of conversation that you're having in free exchange. not just the protestors, the students at stanford law school did this but a dean supported them that. is why what judge ho and the other judges, what they are doing is so important. stanford itself has not taken care of the problem and they put the dean on leave. there needs to be a strong message sent from these schools that you learn about law, you respectfully hear other sides of an argument and that's not what

we are getting right now. >> joe, i was thinking about -- there are parents out there who help pay for their kids to go not just to law school but to stanford law school and they see this on -- maybe they approve of it but i'm sure they are rethinking things or someone is now that there are judges saying, i don't want that in my court. >> hundreds of thousands of dollars to go to stanford university, a lot of people can't afford that obviously and where are they getting their cues by the way? not just from academia but from social media where we talked about so many young adults live on. they see twitter censoring accounts, suppressing free speech, facebook doing the same thing, oh, i guess that's okay because major corporations are doing it. i'm old enough to remember candy rice at rutgers where my kids will not be going anyway, the banned candy rice from coming. she was supposed to speak at

their graduation, first female black secretary of state and you're saying that she isn't welcomed at the university after she was hired to do the commencement speech. we even saw with charlie kirk, he was speaking at uc davis and police offers injured over a guy that runs turning point, the shouting down is one thing but there are polls out where one and five young adults think that violence is okay to shut down speech that they disagree with. one in five. that is scary. >> can i say the hundred -- the hundreds of thousands of dollars that you mentioned is probably the most important part of this that we are not as focused on as we should be. what is that paying for? is that paying for battalions of administrators to the point where there are now in some of these elite institutions more administrators than students and they are the ones who are in charge of this, you know,

progressive method indoctrination and more often than not they are the ones who are whipping these kids who essentially -- they are young kids, they are impressionable, they are supposed to be the smartest ones but still, it's not like they are the ones that are in the avant-garde here, they are being led by armies of administrators that your tuition dollars are paying for. that's what you're getting. you're sending your kids to indoctrination centers and not law schools. >> amazing. alicia: mollie, back to what joe was talk about, and you bring in the fact that there's all of the administrators, are kids used to this now? that's the way it works? is that what they are thinking? mollie: this is something that's happening nationwide. we have such a problem with people not actually respecting, they don't believe in tolerating other viewpoints. that's a problem across every discipline. when it comes to the law,

though, it's important that you are trained and have repeatedly emphasized even some to have best leftist law school administrators have worked hard to make sure that their students are well versed in different interpretations to have law so that when they go in front of the supreme court or go in front of higher court they have a chance of winning cases. as this leftist to -- >> alicia: poll welcomes have to stick around because the big four is next. ♪ ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ welcome back to the extent that show. it is time now for our big four. our picks for the biggest stories everyone will be talking about this week. i'll go first. last night, a buzzer beater shot from the eight propelled the team to the eaa basketball championship game where they will face off against yukon tomorrow night. a four against a pie. i had at the beginning a four against a for my tumor out the first weekend. this is the craziest chart of all time. i want to know who had not one

person on the planet. i think that it may pick that as a final adult with the spongebob you're going to come watch is ending. but we all did that, family bonding talked about earlier, molly quest in ukraine aid tomorrow but this brings us to well over a billion dollars in munitions and aid that have been sent to ukraine making it that we are in the country that has spent nearly every other country combined. most americans say they want support for ukraine but not at the expense of european countries. i wonder how long we can keep doing this without more of a strategic plan for how to win this war quest reference i bet we could be doing the same five years or else but the stalemate between russia and ukraine and insight. we've got to start medic solution because clearly no one is winning this war anytime soon. anyway former governor asa hutchinson announced he's running from the republican nomination for president in 2024.

demographic joe manchin said there is a movement behind run, let's hear it. you considering running for president? what is a movement, there is a movement going on the people want to bring the extreme respect to the sensible, reasonable response moment a quick stop by and is not going to put a strong correlation because he says he cannot travel to europe twice in one month he is too old. he literally said those words so is there a movement? is a sparse independence on the economy and crime i think there could be there perks will be hearing that's for sure. my turn from mystery spines one and for college applicants avoid entire states for political reasons. this makes me kind at. according to survey 31% of a politically leading applicants avoid places like alabama, texas, florida, california, 28% conservatives avoid california and new york.

i find this sad and disappointing because college is a time when you expand your mind not shrink it to mean something you are and have preconceived notion about. mike wanted too. >> that doesn't wrestle see you next weekend the fox report with jon scott starts now. ♪ oka ♪ ♪. jon: a monumental cleanup underwent several states after powerful storms swept through the midwest and south killing at least 27 people. we have team coverage of fox weather max gorden on the ground in hard-hit little rock, arkansas. and at meteorologist adam klotz with the forecast that could see more severe weather this week. i am jon scott and this is the fox report. ♪