tomorrow, all of wisconsin's remaining election integrity laws will bes toed out. there's no voter i.d. anybody against voter i.d. is for fraud, period. so this election has massive ramifications. let's hope it ends the right way. we still don't have the manifesto from the nashville shooting. why can't we see that? more on that tomorrow. >> sean: tucker, thank you. welcome to "hannity." we are just a few hours away from a very dark, a very corrosive chapter in american history with a sloppy d.a., clearly buckling to radical left wing political pressure is now about to cause serious harm to our great republic. tomorrow at 11:00 a.m., donald trump is expected to arrive in court to be arraigned on

far-fetched charges surrounding a legal nondisclosure agreement signed six years ago. according to the media mob, we're watching the crime of the century. today it was o.j. simpson and the white bronco. it was john gotti being brought to justice. nobody is above the law. less than 24 hours, donald trump will be the first former president in history to be charged with a crime but for what? allegations of a mislabelled document? a $130,000 nondisclosure agreement? a case that relies almost in total on the testimony from a convicted admitted liar? a felon by the name of michael cohen? a case that has never been tried before using a new legal theory that was never applied to anyone else? and a cause that looks to be

well-past the statute of limitations. the charges are so weak, the bob mueller, the prior manhattan district attorney declined to bring a case. former congressman that voted to impeach donald trump, this is what he tweeted. we're going to indict a former president for essentially misdemeanor falsification of business records. we're crossing the rubicon for that? that seems like effing weak sauce. what we're witnessing now, this is a political persecution unfolding before your eyes from a repulsive left wing hack that promised to take down donald trump on the campaign trail. as the former assistant attorney said, bragg would not have brought think charges against any defendant not named donald trump. after all, bragg barely brings

charges against actual criminals, violent offenders, rapists, robbers. more than half get off without any felony conviction. they get a free pass, an opportunity to terrorize more innocent new yorkers. crime keeps rising. there was a gas station stabbing a journalist jumped on a subway and and off duty police officer beaten by a biker. these are high profile attacks likely cared out by career criminals that will never see the inside of a prison thanks to the policies of alvin bragg that is too busy going after donald trump. under bragg's watch in this witch hunt against trump, it's not about keeping people in new york safe or security. it's about keeping a campaign promise and appeasing his extreme left wing base and percent cueing political opposition, donald trump and

criminalizing political differences all while attempting to hurt donald trump's reputation and derail his 2024 election campaign. the u.s. has entered a new age of political retribution. if you're hunter biden, let's see. there's evidence on your laptop of you smoking crack or hiring prostitutes or laundering money or maybe skirting on taxes. or lying on a gun application. in a republican state, does that mean you can thank alvin brag if you get charged with a crime? if you're from the biden family or clinton family, thank alvin bragg if you're arrested. when joe leaves office, the big guy, he's likely going to want to hire good lawyers himself. because this new era of political justice, if you want to call it that, will not begin and end at the criminal court in manhattan as tom fenton stated. you can be sure there's prosecutors across florida and

texas right now looking for a state law hook in to the biden family. if they're not, they're not doing their jobs. we should have equal justice, right? equal application of our laws. the former chief counsel mike davis told the post, if new york can turn a routine settlement of a business dispute into a felony, republicans ags and da's should get creative. i hope this is worth it to alvin bragg and the cheerleaders in the democratic party and the media mob. the for left new yorkers that elected him on a promise to go after trump. that was a specific promise. i hope he enjoys his 15 minutes of fame and his celebrity status with the media mob. bragg's small-minded prosecution will likely backfire. it is backfiring. donald trump raised a whopping 7.5 million apparently. we got an update tonight since news of the indictment broke

with over a billion coming from first-time donors. also a report today that since the indictment, close to 20,000 people have signed on to volunteer and help president trump and his 202 tour campaign. that is not all. look at these brand new polls. look at trafalgar. trump has gained 12 points, gone up 20% in the republican primary and is now well over 50%. a poll from yahoo has him at 57%. matt towery's insider advantage has trump at 57%. 80% now believing that the government has been weaponized. now trump is now running neck and neck with biden in a general election and beating outright kamala harris handily in a head-to-head matchup. bragg's attempt to get donald trump might well catapult him right back to the white house. here with reaction is trump attorney joe tacopina. my first question is,

considering mueller was against this, the doj was against it, the fcc was against it, cyrus vance was against it and alvin bragg when he first took office seemed against it. my question now that bragg showed his great courage, is he going to get in the courtroom with you, joe? is he going to try this case start to finish? >> he will be in the courtroom. i think he will be about three or four rows back. when and if the bell rings in a trial in this case, i have a hunch he's going to be a spectator, not a participant. i agree with you. it would be the courageous thing to do when you do something so historic, so monumental bringing an indictment against the first former president in the history of this country. you know, you should try that yourself being you're the one pulling the strings. i can't imagine that happening. of course, i would welcome that. i can't imagine it happening, sean. >> sean: let's go through what day be like. the reports are you and the president will arrive.

others will be there at 11:00 a.m. you'll be before a judge around 2:15. we know the president will be mug shotted and fingerprinted. will he be handcuffed? will there be a guarantee they won't do that? anything extraordinary that you expect tomorrow or is it planned out? >> what is extraordinary is that tomorrow is happening. that's what is extraordinary. >> sean: i don't that point. i agree. it's surreal to me based on this charge, these allegations, this is a federal election committee and a federal election law rule that governs here. here's a state prosecutor, the fec has turned this down. the federal prosecutors have turned this down. anybody that has looked at it turned it down saying there's no violation. now a state prosecutor is going to bring a case based on a federal law violation that doesn't exist according to the federal authorities. it's surreal. it's shocking.

you know, like, we don't know what will happen tomorrow other than pleading loudly not guilty before the judge and go from there. >> sean: there's been a lot of reports toot that there might be a gag order placed on donald trump. a presidential candidate. that has happened in the past. roger stone, i think manafort. i don't remember. know it happened in stone's case. are you telling me there's a possibility that would prevent a presidential candidate from using his free speech rights and defending himself? >> can't be. won't happen. i don't believe anybody is looking for that. that would really set ablaze the passions and the tempers that already have been inflamed by this case. people view this as a political persecution. the numbers you showed in your introduction regarding his increase in popularity in the polls and the amount of money that has come in are because people are infuriated.

they're now understanding that weaponization of the justice system is a real thing. attempting to gag a united states citizen that is a defendant, not a lawyer, not a litigant but a defendant in the case, you know, especially that's a first amendment violation obviously. it has to be balanced against a right to a fair trial. imagine putting a gag on donald trump when he's the frontrunner for the republican party for the presidential office. imagine during the campaign he's told, you know, i can't speak about the case. when people ask him questions, he has to say sorry, i have a gag order. that would directly interfere with the election as this prosecution has done. that would further interfere with the election. there's no scenario that that would happen. i'm sure of that. i don't think it will be requested. >> sean: let me ask this. i know the president said he doesn't believe he can get a fair trial. you've tried over 100 cases in new york city over the course of your career.

very successful in most instances. my question to you is this is a city where democrats outnumber republicans nearly 10-1. you have a seated jury, the odds are that the overwhelming number of potential jurors in this case are going to be registered democrats. democrats in this country, they seem to bubble and fizz like alka-seltzer and water just at the very name donald trump or the face of donald trump. so i wonder, you don't have to give away your strategy, but i have doubts if he can get a fair trial here. i do. why not have a chang of venue to make sure that it's at least a 50/50 part of new york state. >> we're absolutely going to obviously consider all things. the legal team has been meeting and discussing. there will be a host of motions we'll make including off the bat a motion to dismiss based on

selective prosecution. there's other things to consider like a venue change and other motions that wouldn't be right to get in to. we have to see this indictment. but look, at the end of the day, when -- if this gets to a jury and it shouldn't get to a jury because it should be dismissed on the law. if it gets to a jury, what our team would do, look, the jurors in the eyes and say you're not voting for a political office here. this is not a presidential campaign or a gubernatorial campaign, this is someone's life and liberty. this is much more serious than what side of the political spectrum you're on. this is someone's life and liberty and whether they're deemed a criminal the rest of their life. most people that want to be able to look themselves in the mirror for the rest of their lives will follow the law and go into follow the facts. if they follow the law and the facts in this case, if we get to a jury, again, this should be the quickest verdict in the

history of the united states of america. so look, we have to weigh all things. we do have to consider the bias against president trump in this city. we will weigh it. but ultimately people who are going to be sitting in judgment of him, if it gets that far, are going to really have to be so conscientious of their oath and duty and the rule of law in this country. if we say it's donald trump, we don't have to worry about it. like you said, there's a republican prosecutor in texas that will be gearing up for a democrat now, this is what we're going to use the justice system, to be a political tool in this country. rule of law is dead, dead if that happened, sean. >> sean: you said a number of teams in this interview, if they get that far. are you not expecting it to get that far? >> let me be very clear. the only reason it would not get that far is because the case would be dismissed on papers. okay? there's zero, zero chance where

donald trump is pleading to anything here. he committed to crime, committed to wrong. not a misdemeanor, not a felony, not a traffic ticket. there's nothing here. so i'm talking about this cause should fall on the law. we're going to be pushing that obviously. we have to evaluate everything, including indictment. i still can't believe this is going to survive our vigorous motions to dismiss. >> sean: let's talk about the statute of limitations. the new york state law which is a misdemeanor and this unprecedented novel idea, never has been used before of marrying it to an election law, federal election law. will you -- do you think the statute of limitations has expired on both the state law and the federal level? >> so there's misdemeanors and there's felonies. there's a question as to whether government cuomo's extension of the statute of limitations by a

year and 45 days in the covid period will hold. even with that, it's very close. the math has to be done. a lot of issues. that is one of the things that we'll be looking at. this is the oldest case in the books of all the things that we're investigating. i strikes me as so incredibly odd that they're going to bring a case weak on the law, that will have problems surviving serious motions that is this old, that is in petty, that has nothing to do with the election or the campaign but was a personal civil settlement that is done every day, done between a lawyer and another lawyer when they orchestrated a settlement arrangement that the president wasn't privy too. he didn't sign the agreement. when he was in office, his organization paid some legal fees for that as they were invoiced. it's amazing to think that this is a case that they believe

falls under the fec rules and regulations, the federal election committee's rules and regulations and violates any of those laws. it does not. not by a long shot. we've been terrific fec people. bradley smith and i have spoken. he's confirmed that. i really just don't know where they think they're going to wind up here. if it was just to get the 15 minutes tomorrow to get him in to a courtroom and what not, who knows. >> sean: let me ask you a final question. >> jesse: considering we all know what bragg said, he ran a campaign to get donald trump, one man, one when, the trump organization, the trump family. do you believe that this is selective prosecution and prosecutorial abuse on his part? and is there any remedy for you on that level? >> of course. that is why it is selective prosecution. you know, again, if he was not

named donald trump, there would be no indictment. that's a fact. i've said it to you in times. i saw andrew mccarthy echoed that. there would not be a case if this wasn't donald trump. so that is where you know we're really gone amuck here. you select the person that you don't like, donald trump and you try to find a crime. so it is mind boggling to my that we're here, we are here. it's just not going to hold up. so these charges that they're cobbling together to try to make felonies out of won't survive a chapel hill challenge. >> tucker: joe tacopina, the president's attorney. we'll be here tomorrow for reaction. joining us now, the author of a best seller, "get trump" and deals with every legal issue the president is facing, harvard law professor, alan dershowitz is with us and the author of "the trial of the century", gregg

jarrett. alan dershowitz, you said he's a presidential candidate. they did this in the roger stone case. my question to you is how does a judge get to take away the right of an american to speak out on their own behalf on a very public case like this? >> tragically judges have done that. they have done it recently. i was glad to see joe be optimistic that they won't do it in this case. if they did do it, i would immediately put together the great first amendment lawyers in america as amicus. we would be the victims. there's two first amendment rights, the right of the speaker and the right of the listener according to justin marshall. it's just as important. i hope it won't happen. that would really mean a body

blow to the first amendment. today you couldn't count on the american civil liberty's union to defend donald trump. they would lose their up theeding. the only disagreement i have with joe, a great lawyer, i think he's too much open an optimist. i can not imagine an elected judge in the borough of manhattan throwing out this case and having to go to his family and say i'm the lawyer who freed donald trump or his friends or business associates. all he has to do is remember what happened to me when i defended, just defended donald trump on the senate. lost all of my friends, clients, business associates and no judge is going to want to be "dershowitz." so you're not going to have an opportunity to get a fair assessment of statute of limitations, change of venue. this is a fixed case if it's tried in manhattan. in my book i --

>> sean: professor, ho hold on second. you're saying the rule of law doesn't exist here. you're -- >> it does not exist for donald trump. in my book, "get trump", i prove the rule of law has an exemption. there's the rule for everybody else and the rule for donald trump. his lawyers, his associates, his family. this is from a man that voted against trump and intends to vote against him again. donald trump wrote to me today as he was getting on the plane. he said, alan, getting ready to leave for new york. can't really believe it. these maniacs want to destroy our country. so sad. nobody on hunter biden. your words are very important. save america. p.s., congrats on the book, doing very well." the thesis of the book is the rule of law does not apply to donald trump in the borough of manhattan. there's no way he gets a fair trial in manhattan. >> sean: and you go through

fulton county and the special counsel and you make the case on everyone of the charges that are being brought up against him. let's bring in greg. let's talk about a change of venue. let's talk about the statute of limitations. prosecutorial abuse. selective prosecution. you know, greg, i look at these issues. it's all slam dunk. all of these things should throw this case out immediately. yet that doesn't appear to be happening. >> yeah, but you've identified all the things that lead me to now believe that we don't have a justice system anymore. we only have a legal system. it appears corrupted. americans have recognized this. they have lost faith in our legal system. there's a reason why trump's polling numbers have shot up, his campaign coffers are now filled with millions of dollars over the last three days, because americans are very smart people. they see what is going on.

this is a persecution disguised as a prosecution. they recognize that this is a febrile zombie case resurrected from the dead and purely politically motivated. a whopping 76% in the latest cnn polls say this is politically motivated. they're right. it is. there's other reasons that are deeply troubling to americans and why they don't like this. they see this as a purely personal matter, a relic of a case that happened a great many years ago and yes, the statute of limitations long ago passed. but most of all, you know, they see this as the same old tired act. it's a replay of the russian hoax. government officials egged on by democrats going after a political opponent with vengeance. it was the greatest mass delusion in american political history. you would think that the

government has learned from this. but you have a local prosecutor who now wants to put on trial the leading opponent of his bragg's political party. i think in the end, this will backfire tremendously. >> sean: let me ask you -- >> i agree. >> sean: i want to look at this novel legal theory that they're using here. never been used before. they take a state misdemeanor case where clearly the statute of limitations are way over by two years. marry to it a federal election law whose statute of limitations i would argue also have passed. yet they put to together. this has never happened before. they're doing this to him. keep in mind, this is a prosecutor that in 52% of felony cases reduces those felonies to misdemeanors. this is the only time he's taking a misdemeanor and trying to raise to it the level of a felony. that's why i'd like to see bragg

himself try this case. >> it's ludicrous on its face. you know, i think it will face motions to dismiss not just on the statute ute of limitations but the argument that the law doesn't support this kind of a charge. the alleged fact s don't suppor a crime. i'd like to see an honest judge, objective and neutral, look at the motions to dismiss seriously and sincerely. i slightly disagree with the professor. do think they most judges do not want to be and fearful of being overturned by a higher court. i hope that gives this particular judge pause when he considers the motions to dismiss. >> jesse: >> sean: same question, professor. >> in this case, a judge would rather be reveersed on appeal than have to come home and look his wife and family in the eye and say i let trump out. also, the appellate court judges

are elected, this is going to be a very hard case in which to get justice. look, the statute of limitations issue is so clear. they could have indicted him any time in the last six years. when did they indict him? they indicted him when in in florida. what is the difference? that might be appealable right away. the other arguments about selective prosecution, whether or not the statute really covers this, you have to wait for a conviction to appeal those. so some virtue in making change of venue, statute of limitations that are appealable. in terms of the basic case, there's no misdemeanor here. let's explain. so there was a payment made. the payment was made to prevent information from coming out to his wife and family and business associates about an alleged affair. and bragg is saying, once he paid the money to keep

everything quiet, he should have listed it on his corporate form as hush money paid to a former porn star. never in the history of the world has anybody paid hush money hand put it on a public form. it's always disguised. never in history has anybody -- >> sean: it's disguised because legally it's a nondisclosure agreement. you're not allowed to talk about it publicly. >> remember, this is just -- >> the other aspect of it, the falsifying of business records is a fraud according to bragg? who is he defrauded? his own business? this is utter nonsense. the predicate crime of the misdemeanor expired five years ago. i just don't see how you get there if you're alvin bragg. >> sean: i have to leave you both here. >> it's manhattan. don't expect justice in this case. it won't happen. maybe when it gets to the supreme court.

i love manhattan. >> sean: i agree with you, professor. he can't get a fair trial. they need a change of venue and i don't believe that motion will succeed. i wish i was wrong. thank you both. alan dershowitz, gregg jarrett. president trump back in new york city ahead of his expected arraignment tomorrow. sarah carter is live right outside of trump tower. i understand there's been cops there most of the day. sarah? >> yeah, for sure, sean. president trump arrived this afternoon to beefed up security. the nypd put up barricades all along in front of trump towers and across the street. there's been lookyloos. some supporting donald trump here on the streets. you can see there's a lot of commotion here at trump tower. we spent the day in new york

city talking to folks. just asking them, how they feel about what has been happening with president trump and the arraignment tomorrow. here's what they had to say. >> do you think this is a politically motivated indictment by the manhattan d.a.? >> no doubt. only political. everything that they've done against trump has been political starting with russia collusion. it's a pack of lies. >> it's think he's charged like anybody else would be. i think it's great it's happening. >> any other politician would have been scrutinized as trump has been? >> no. i do not. >> why do you think that is? >> he's a polarizing figure. when you're a poll -- >> this is going nowhere. it's a big waste of time. >> do you think any other politician would face the statement scrutiny? >> absolutely. >> you think? >> absolutely, yes.

>> he's the first one. >> other politicians -- he's the first president. other politicians have been indicted before, haven't they? >> you think if it was anybody else would this be happen something. >> of course not. trump, there's no question. i think the democrats would agree to that as well. trump is definitely the -- by the way, is guaranteeing him 2024. this is the best thing quite frankly for the trump supporters. >> sean, one thing is certain. everybody is concerned. what does this mean? this is a historical time in american history. i think people are worried about the divide in the country. they're worried about the future, what that holds for president trump. i know tomorrow they're expecting a number of protests. mayor eric adams says he's ready for it. the nypd say they're ready for it. they're not expecting a loot of commotion but they are expecting a lot of people on the streets. sean? >> sean: sarah carter, the last

guy summed it up well. if it was a democrat or anybody else, this wouldn't be happening. it's only because it's donald trump. thank you. we appreciate that report. now amid the latest witch hunt and predictable media mob frenzy that has ensued, how has the trump family reacting to the indictment? here now with some insight, former president trump's daughter-in-law, lara trump is back with us. eric was on the plane with him. i talked with him on my radio show today. it's kind of surreal. i have to imagine, your family has been through a lot. mueller, stormy, stormy. this is all gone on for years now. not one but two impeachments. they've done everything humanly possible to destroy father-in-law. this is the next step, making up law that was never used before in an attempt with the statute of limitations passed in an

attempt to take down father-in-law again. >> it goes to show you how afraid that are of donald trump. when you have to go so far to make up a crime and piece it together with scotch tape to bring town donald trump. they've been trying to do this for years, almost seven years now to take him down. it's rather amazing. yeah, it's a little surreal to think this is where we are right now in the united states of america. i think it's frightened a lot of people. it's awakened a lot of people. as of 72 hours post indictment, the trump campaign raised $7 million. that is an incredible statistic. as i said a quarter of the donations were first time trump supporters. they had never donated to trump before. it's amazing to see the support from people out there, even with sarah carter's interviews.

people really do get it. >> sean: i hope the people that are on the jury get it as well and see it as a political persecution and not a real trial and not based on real law. i'm watching -- i want your reaction. i know eric was on the plane with father-in-law. your reaction to the o.j.-like coverage of all of this. o.j., of course, accused of killing two people. the driver of the car saying he's got a gone and in the back seat and he may kill himself, this is over $130,000 be nda about an affair that both sides agree never happened even after the money was paid. so my -- that's got to be surreal to you and your entire family. >> the craziest part, sean, is after landing in new york to see the entire new york police department in full force,

mobilized, lining the streets. in must have cost the taxpayers of new york tens of millions of dollars, the security coverage for this. you just said it, over what? over $130,000 completely legal nda, this happens every day in the united states of america. the sad part, alvin bragg in manhattan is supposed to be locking up criminals. supposed to be keeping the streets safe. this is where the energy and focus and taxpayer money is going? we know their investigation has been years long in to my father-in-law. they're trying to find anything possible on him. here we are on the eve of his arraignment, obviously he will go down to the courthouse tomorrow, he will be fingerprinted. i assume there will be a mug shot taken. all over something that was not a crime. the only crime that donald trump committed, of course, was

winning the 2016 election without the help of the swamp and the establishment. >> sean: it says on drudge, mug shot of the century. pete hegseth made a good point earlier. he said that will probably become the biggest selling trump 2024 t-shirt out there. probably add hads and other swag with it as well. i think that will backfire on people. when people look at the insignificance of the issue and allow that had never been used before and the length and the depth and the depravity of this indictment to begin with and then to do this to a former president, i do believe there will be a backlash. i mentioned two polls that show a 20% increase in the president's approval rating and poll numbers since the indictment. so i think that's going to tell us a lot. >> i think it will.

i think you're right. i think that mug shot will probably go down in history as the most famous mug shot to exist in america for sure. but i think people really get it. they see donald trump as a symbol. really a freedom, a symbol for all the freedom loving patriots in this country. let's face it. he's stood up against all different kinds of attacks throughout the time he ran for president the first time, the second time, while he was in the white house. he continues to stand up in the face of it despite this. they want him to quit. they want him to give up. they want him to stop. he refuses to do it. so what do they have to do? make up charges, bring him up to new york, spend tens of millions of new york city taxpayer dollars all for nothing. it will only make him more stronger and solidify him as the 47th president. >> sean: thanks, lara trump.

as mark levin says a post constitutional america. straight ahead, a lot to come tonight, a lot of news to break. is the indictment already backfiring on the left? we'll give you more information on the new polling. also we'll check in with stephen miller, kayleigh mcenany . they react when we come back. stay with us. ts. how's your heart? my heart's pretty good. you sure? how do you know? you're driving a car you have to check engine light. but the heart doesn't have a hey check heart sign. with kardiamobile. the fda cleared a personal ekg device. you can take a medical grade ekg in just 30 seconds from anywhere. kardiamobile is proven to detect atrial fibrillation, one of the leading causes of stroke. kardiamobile is now available for just $79. order at kardiamobile.com or amazon.

scout is protected by simparica trio, and he's in it to win it. simparica trio is the first and only chew with triple protection. oh, fleas and ticks

♪ intestinal worms... wow heartworm disease, no problem with simarica trio. this drug class has been associated with neurologic adverse reactions including seizures. use with caution in dogs with a history of these disorders. for winning protection. go with simparica trio.

>> sean: all right. so this latest political witch hunt backfiring on democrats? according to new reporting, it might be. we have the new polls out. trump has a commanding lead over the republican field and trafalgar's survey shows trump

leading ron desantis by 30. a new poll shows trumps lead expanding 20 points. one official said the trump campaign raised now as of tonight, just tweeted out by the trump team, over $8 million in just the last number of hours following the indictment. we're hearing from jason miller the figure is going higher by the day and nearly 20,000 people have signed up to volunteer for the trump campaign. anyway, here with reaction, former senior advise tore president trump, stephen miller and the author of "serenity in the storm", kayleigh mcenany is with us, also "outnumbered" co host. we have poll numbers jumping. it happened, kayleigh, when the mar-a-largo raid took place. it's happening now here. meaditely after this, there's a civil case a charge that 27 years ago inside of a department

store in a changing room that donald trump allegedly attacked a woman. that's the next thing on the table. following that is the georgia case. i read the transcript multiple times. i don't see anything that looks like a crime in any way, shape, manner or form and fulton county georgia is probably as liberal as new york city. >> yeah,justice robert jackson basically said and i'll paraphrase him here, we could find a violation of the law of a technicality of any person in the united states. which is why we don't find the man and then the crime. we find the crime and then the man that committed the crime. it's the opposite. it's inverted in this case. i think everyone in this country can recognize the miscarriage of justice. when you have jeb bush and ron desantis and donald trump and billion barr and the list goes on and on on the same page on this, that should tell you

something. these are political opponents that are rallying around the concept of justice. you cannot attack a man because you don't support his presidential ambitions. jeb bush said it best. you're trying to take a jury and make them the voters of the united states of america, this will backfire as dougly murray said to us on "outnumbered." i think they unleash add boomerang that will come back in the other direction. >> stephen miller, same question. first you have this particular case unfolding. you see what happens with the raid at mar-a-largo. polls go up. now polls have gone up since the indictment. you have the case of an attack against a woman 27 years ago in a dressing room in a department store. following that is a very weak case out of fulton county, georgia. does that mean every one of these he faces his poll numbers go up? >> what is happening to president trump and to the

country is a tragedy of unspeakable proportions. at the same time, president trump has looked at the american people and he said they're coming after me because they want to get to you. i'm standing in the way. i'm fighting for border security, fighting for a strong economy, fighting to take down the foreign countries breeding this country of its wealth and prestige. people are rallying around up trump because he's detailing with precision what he's going to do for the american people. what the democrats, the radical left, the progressives and bureaucrats are trying to do to him to stop that from happening. that is why you see these poll numbers going up, sean. >> sean: you heard sarah carter. even liberals in new york, when asked the question, would this happen to anybody but donald trump? the obvious answer is no, it would not. this is the same guy that lets out career criminals, people

robbing banks, people that are violent, rapist, murderers. you know, this guy is the most lenient d.a. in the country. yet not in this case. >> yeah, i was researching alvin bragg's former campaign website, which now you can only find in the archives. he makes vows to the people of new york. i will not prosecute petty crimes. there's no reason for petty crimes to be prosecuted in the same court as murderers. he's very clear about his priorities. he says with very few exceptions. now we know what the exceptions are. if your name is donald trump. and you're a former president. this is a travesty and he violated the law a.m. people pointed out leaking the grand jury information. >> sean: if you're last night is clinton, biden or hunter,

nothing will happen to you. if you're james comey, today is a good day when he treated out trump got indicted. nothing happened to him. he signed three fisa warrants that are not verified. nothing happens to him either. >> that's what it all comes down to. if you're a member of the corrupt permanent political class, be it clinton, be it comey, biden, be it any of them, you're immunized from prosecution in this country no matter what crime you commit. if you stand up to the permanent political class and you're perfectly innocent. they will come at you with everything that they. have that's is what is happening to donald trump. as kayleigh pointed out, the same time you have this d.a. in new york, alvin bragg letting the most violent and dangerous offenders off the hook again and again and as they're being released, they're killing innocent people in that city. >> sean: stephen miller, thanks. kayleigh mcenany , thank you. coming up next, the left, they

cannot wait, they can't wait to see donald trump's mug shot. but could that backfire also on them politically? we'll explain straight ahead.

>> sean: all right. it's called the mug shot of the century. the left can't wait to see trump's booking photo. what they may not realize, this picture will only rally trump supporters ahead of 2024. here with reaction, tomi lahren and pam bondi. pam, start with you. we just went over this with kayleigh and stephen miller. it's really simple. they raid mar-a-largo, his approval rating goes up. this makes his approval rating go up dramatically. will the mug shot do the same thing, that they so want and desire and crave? >> they thought that charging him would divide our party.

it united our party. they thought they would hu mailate him by making him surrender tomorrow. that booking photo will be a symbol of strength. every american will see their own face in that photo. every parent that doesn't want to talk about transgender values with their child, every christian teacher that doesn't want to read bad book to their students. every single homeowner that defends themselves when someone does a home invasion, they'll be seeing themselves. donald trump in that photo will be the only one standing between all of us and the radical left. that's what is about to happen tomorrow. >> sean: tomi lahren, how do you see it? >> in 2015 and 2016, donald trump had the megahat. that's been a symbol. this mug shot will be that times 20. this is symbolic of this

president from day ones that been fighting for the american people. let's not forget what this man has been put through. before he ran for president, he was liked and gave it up when the endless witch hunts against him, sham impeachment one and two, they have gone after him. he's given it all up to defend the forgotten american. that mug shot is symbolic of it. they see the hat with a mug shot across a t-shirt. it will work for him fabulously. >> sean: i should have trademarked that earlier. maybe the first person out gets a lot of money. pam, look at the economy. people living paycheck to paycheck. saudi arabia and china getting together. china is brokering a deal with

saudi arabia and syria. their influence in latin american, their influence in africa. i'm looking at this and the comments with president xi and vladimir putin. why do i get closer and the world situation is going to be so dangerous? i think they're going to want the guy that world leaders fear, whoever that is. don't you think? >> absolutely, sean. i think americans are already seeing that. they've been seeing it for the last three years. what has been happening in this office. they know donald trump has the resume, donald trump has the track record. president xi, putin, none of them would have done any of this had donald trump been president. the world leaders know it and americans now see it. dramatic decline that has happened in our country. he's done it once and he's the only human being that can fix our country again. >> sean: tomi lahren, you were more open to a long primary before you make your mind up.

is this -- does this or all of this in any way change your view? you think this persecution, not prosecution, you think this will change the view of many people that, you know, are sick and tired of all of the attacks against one man, one company, one family? >> hear's what i think is really frustrating, too. we have to focus on this whip hundred. i want to focus on what donald trump will do to save this country once again. i'm glad that he's got the microphone because of this indictment. he will battle through it. he's the toughest man on earth right now. i want to talk about how he's going to fix the country and i want independents to vote on that and this two-tiered system of justice and how he's going to make america great again and get the world back in line. that's what donald trump can do. he's done it before and we can do it again. we have his back. >> sean: thanks. more "hannity" straight ahead.

>> all right, before we go a programming note. we have a live audience show wednesday and thursday this week and, by the way, our in-studio guest jimmy failla, kayleigh

mcenany, day began mick do you tammy bruce you can be a part for more, tomorrow lavine dan bongino jonathan turley allen dershowitz kellyanne conway and much more. thank you for making this show possible. please set your dvr so you never miss an episode. pete hegseth my friend and colleague filling in for laura. i have to give you credit i've been giving you at contribution and credit for the thought that, you know what? this mug shot that comes out tomorrow or whenever it comes out is going to be the number one selling t-shirt and hat in the country, and it will say underneath it trump 2024. >> that's exactly right, t-shirt, door rooms, hats, it is a symbol, for sure. >> can i invest with you in this business that you're going to start? i'd like to get in