80 pounds of gear. >> taking that to the helmet. a lot going on. [laughter] we will see you tomorrow. may words and maybe not. ♪. neil: on top of the sovereign court ruling coming down the nation's highest scored allowing abortion to stay on the market for now. while the case against it precedes it. what really happens next? what is that all mean for the 2024 race? erase president biden is said to be days away for officially joining. it comes just days after robert f kennedy jr. formally announced the will challenge the current president. the first kennedy to do so since ted kennedy back. we'll ask him what he is up to it where he this race going. welcome everyone i am neil

cavuto on this busy weekend for the present himself at camp david. the white house they are preparing for something very big come tuesday. for that we go to lucas tomlinson. neil, as you mentioned present biden's spending the weekend at camp david days ahead of the expected announcement is running for reelection officially this time out on tuesday. yesterday the white house did not want to talk about it. >> i'm not going to talk about 2024 georgia look like part of not to talk about that from here. as a government employee federal law prohibits me from discussing campaign related topics from this podium. [inaudible] >> do not have anything to say about 2024. >> a new poll from the associated press says most people do not want biden to do it again. 73% of all adults in fact do not want to read again.

41% of democrats say they will definitely be voting for biden if he is the nominee. another 40% say though probably vote if he is the nominee. the rest what robert f kennedy jr. to be the next president he announces during his hat in the ring this week and running for president he hopes his dull personality or excuse me his presidency will be the magic formula. >> and putting on my sunglasses so i can see. [cheering] >> as i my dissolution for massachusetts a good friend senator markey it's really, really very dull after all these in public life your known for two things ray-ban sunglasses and chocolate chip ice cream. very dull president. >> of course it's been a long time coming. you will recall late lesser president biden said he intended to run for reelection. now it looks like it will be official early next week.

neil: thank you my friend lucas at the white house right let's get the read on all this the significance of this in the hill editor and chief. what i found remarkable in that pole if you are fewer than half the democrats want biden to the nominee but two thirds will vote for him if he is in fact the nominee. along comes robert f kennedy jr. coming out of the gate with 14% support. i found that rather interesting. what did you make of that? >> joe biden has an enthusiasm problem. as a polling shows democrats are not enthused. but without a doubt this is going to be an uphill battle. a lot of people, as he poll shows, will vote for biden if he wins the nomination. and obviously he is the fav favorite. but neil, they mediate loves drama and this is a candidate pretty could get interesting. quick celeste kennedy to challenge an incumbent back in 1980 when ted kennedy took on then jimmy carter.

jimmy carter survived that but the whole ticket went down in defeat in a landslide defeat. substantial challenges to a sitting president can be troublesome. gerald ford remembered that very well when ronald reagan invested in for the nomination in 1976. so what you make of these intraparty challenges? consistently not going to help the president. remember joe biden one and 2020 but he won barely. if he is weakened in any way that could make the difference in the general election. and certainly these questions about marion williamson or kennedy they're going to continue and they are going to keep attacking the president. that's when to attract headlines for this is going to be a nuisance i think for the white house and the president. neil: ultimately as you have taught me, bob, especially featuring an incumbent seeking reelection is about the incumbent. some of the job he is doing. in this case there is concern

that may be the economy struggles along. it does not help the president's case. maybe by then the fears have subsided, we do not know. we note that doomed jimmy carter. people who months earlier had doubts about ronald reagan put them to rest when they got to see a chance for him to debate jimmy carter. actually only days before the election. and that turned the tide. now, ted kennedy and jimmy carter never had that within the democratic party. what do you make of those dynamics? >> i think the president has a tough sell paid the president saying the economy is doing well. he's going to be attacked from the left and the right on that. most people we are in a recession will be headed for a recession. the white house is citing none of the economy is good but most people don't think that, that is a dangerous message i think. neil: there's also the idea that republicans and democrats are far apart philosophically if it's donald trump who ends up

getting the republican nomination or ron desantis, very to the right of center. the argument that joe biden has emerged to be a far more progressive liberal candidates and a president that he was in his first running for this office. so there will not be very many shades of gray between whoever we see featured on the ballot. how does that play out among independence? >> i think this will be interesting. joe biden 2020 rank it's donald trump right this time he's going to have to weigh in as president. it's going to have to make the case. i once a net of four years. i think the counter to that you better off for years to go? we have heard that it many conventions before and we are going to hear that in 2024. >> when he think? particularly on the republican side with donald trump with the santos not even formally announcing he is wiping the table with these endorsements.

i just want to get your thoughts on what to make of that. i don't jeb bush in 2016 was wiping the table with endorsements. not by the kind of margin donald trump enjoys right now it's ron desantis but what you make of that? >> it shows you trump has the base of the party that a lot of politicians think it's a lot safer to endorse trump right now a former president over too santos who may or may not get to the finish line. i think it is significant that shows the experience compared to the desantis campaign he won by 19 points in 2022. that is very impressive but this is a whole new ballgame and i think desantis is going to shift into another gear to actually defeat the former president and the primary. >> what is interesting to comment the support and endorsements donald trump is getting are coming from florida congressman carlos was telling on the show why he did so i want

you to react to this. >> i am supporting president donald j trump for president in 2024. think he gives us a better chance of winning. he has a solid track record as a president for quick there's no reason to keep her waiting to get on board of who i think is the next winner and our next president. that gentleman is donald j trump cards i've known ron desantis for about a decade he's a good man i support ron desantis we need to have new leadership in someone who will energize us carrying forward you do not take shots at someone you're not a little worried about. i think ron desantis is a good direction for the country. neil: the overwhelming reflection of the florida delegation as it stands right now is support for president trump and not ron desantis. having said all of that do you put much stock in these endorsements? what kind of makes them compelling is the endorsers are fully aware of the indictments the first for president american history for they say it's just noisy saves a prosecutorial

overage. they are looking at the poll numbers and say our voters do not seem to have a problem with it. we do not have a problem with mitt, your thoughts? >> i think it is significant. donald trump has a way of connecting with people. he loves to call people pretty called me a year ago to talk about a story we wrote. he knows the personal touch that's what is it with the florida delegation he knew this to be a big story and it is. is it make a difference for voters? i don't think so. but it does attract momentum but right now trump's campaign has a lot of momentum i do not see that stopping anytime soon. as you mentioned i think the indictment help them in the short term will see in the long term but in the short term it definitely boosted his poles. >> it's very, very clear always good chatting with you, thank you very much for that. in the meantime we are going to be talking to robert f kennedy jr. and why he decided to do this. many in his own family are saying we love you, but no we

are not going to support you on that. why he is doing this, after t this. use the three p's: plan ahead by getting a va cash out home loan from newday. pay off your high rate credit cards. pay yourself cash. how to grow more vibrant flowers: step one: feed them with miracle-gro shake 'n feed. that's it. miracle-gro. all you need to know to grow. hi, i'm tony hawk, and like many of you, i take a statin to reduce cholesterol, but statins can also deplete coq10 levels. that's why my doctor recommended qunol coq10. qunol has the number one cardiologist recommended form of coq10. qunol. the brand i trust.

neil: already. it might be the legal equivalent of a court punting let an abortion pill stay on the market until appeals in this case are exhausted we do not know how long that could be alexandria hoff has more on. >> what this decision does is make sure the abortion drug will remain freely available as lawsuit seeking to restrict it and make their way to the lower courts the supreme court granted the emergency request by the justice and the pills and manufacturers just hours before restrictions were set to go into effect putting on hold the plenary injunction issued by u.s. district judge in texas back on april 7. that case it sought to limit

access to the drug while pro-life groups challenge the pills regulatory approval. the supreme court brief order yesterday blocked such restrictions earned praise from the white house restatement present writer wrote i continue to stand by fda evidence-based approval of mifepristone my in ministration will continue to defend fda independent expert authority to review approve and regulate a wide range of prescription drugs for yesterday's ruling is a brief victory for the bite administration which has sought to preserve access to abortion in the wake of roe v wade being overturned at 10 months ago for the issue right now for the court does not necessarily abortion pills directly. that is the fda's decision should approve them more than two decades ago that is. since then mifepristone has been used by more than 5 million women to terminate present pregnancies. pro-life groups claim the fda unlawfully removed safeguards and chosen politics over science. the bite administration and mifepristone manufacturer maintained has repeatedly been found safe and effective. neil: all right alexander thank

you for that. katy constitutional law att attorney. you know, katy, what does this decision mean? does it circle what the courts in dobbs decision which effectively left this in the states hands-free night have a drug that's used to cross state boundaries all over the country. an out pointed out more than five men people abuse over the past 23 years or so. so, does that circle with the decision itself that they made? >> that's an interesting question i think we do have to remember that when the court looked at dobbs they were questioning whether abortion was a federal right essentially. the question in the current case is much more narrow and deals with a federal agency properly complied with the federal law in approving the drug in rolling back some of the restrictions on access to it. so i think here the supreme court actually made a decision that seems pretty consistent with the prior precedent which

is generally to be deferential to the fda's approval and the science regarding the medication. but for now we're going to have to wait to suit actually happens after the fifth circuit rules on it and what the supreme court will do at that point sprayed they will in fact have to make a decision since it will be a circuit split between the states regarding what the fda can do with this medication. so ultimately the supreme court will wait and again minutes on a more technical issue. neil: on a not so technical issue and wondering and states have really tightened abortion restrictions, some for example the case of florida were governor desantis wants to limit abortions to those under six weeks of a pregnancy. i am wondering how a pill like this that has interstate commerce and backing up women all over the country can use it, how that will dry up jive with

whatever they ultimately decide? >> at the moment any state where abortion is limited or even restricted heavily, that still applies. the issue with mifepristone it applies to states that do allow access to abortion. by the fifth circuit ruling really rolling back access to this drug that limits access to folks across the states across the country. in all the states were abortion is already highly limited that remains the case. as he supreme court said in dobbs they want to leave those decisions the state legislatures. obviously when we have issues of interstate comments they are going to have to weigh in. but i think they can leave it essentially to a decision of the fda ultimately and whether the court defers to the fda's actions is really the bigger question here in my mind. neil: are presently women who want to get this drug, even in states that crackdown on abortions, ken? >> if your state has really

cracked down on abortion than many of those doctors cannot prescribed this medication in the first place. but with these supreme court holding a yesterday this does open up accessor reopens access to everybody in states where there was access to abortion. so generally speaking the limitations on abortion access in states that restrict remains the case. for other folks where it is open for now that remains the same as it was before all of these courts are ruling on the issue. thirty-six is more a political than legal question you have covered the supreme court quite well. we are told they go in with blinders on to the political world around them. but of course they know that decision they made on dobbs changed the complexion of elections read some say it tipped what could have been a landslide win for republicans in the midterms into a squeaker that actually had them losing the senate.

so do they think of that? do they look at the impact of that and say all right whatever we are doing we are a conservative court attorney may conservative cause. what to think the the court tries to be apolitical. that's very unrealistic in many ways. it really do find it interesting here with what the supreme court did by allowing the drug to remain in the marketplace as before. this is a bit nuanced. if we look back the supreme court has previously actually looked at very similar cases on the opposite side of the political spectrum where they said they will defer to the fda's decision in terms of the distribution of this medication. the question here is whether that will remain to be the case when this case comes up to the supreme court will they say the fda subject matter that any rollbacks on the access seem to be the decision they made and they will endorse that? or will they actually override the federal agency's decision

which would be inconsistent with what they did during the covid pandemic under the trump administration where folks were asking to have less restrictions on accessing that drug at the time in the court. in that case the fda made these rules for a reason and they are going to defer to them. so i think the court may have a little bit of wiggle room to try to remain apolitical if you will. but this issue will never be apolitical truly. the court is trying to get out of the abortion business for the going to keep facing these issues for the big question is how much deference will they get to the fda here? neil: interesting, katy for that. following this close indecision we are told it should be a few months away will shall see. in the meantime big city mayors, democratic mayors who are certainly talking tough on crime now. folks wonder where have you been before? after this.

this isn't just freight. these aren't just shipments. they're promises. promises of all shapes and sizes. each, with a time and a place they've been promised to be. a promise is everything to old dominion, because it means everything to you.

we cannot be embarrassed to say that we need to support public safety and have our police do their jobs effectively. >> allowed for some something only solution and unarmed response is not the only solution as well. >> mayors are not soft on crime we are investing in all of the tools to make our city safe. after people in my city wreaking havoc every day and need to be off the street. neil: right democratic big city it mayors say crime is a problem of different ways of addressing it right now partly see the reminders every day. in los angeles it has become a full-time concern now. the number of prominent

officials have done 180 on this. matt feehan has the latest. >> it is about how we can bring in officers that are ready to hit the ground or running pretzels angels mayor karen bass is calling for urgent action to hire hundreds more police officers. since 2019 lapd has lost almost 1000 officers. los angeles police union tells a fox news hiring right now it may be a hard sell. >> morale is an all-time low. we have a d.a. does not support the police. we have former city leaders have bought into the defendant movement progress los angeles is launching a recruitment campaign offering financial incentives and asking recently retired officers to come back. but adding to the problem more than 300 undercover lapd officers recently filed legal claims after their names on photos were published by the progressive news outlet knock l.a. who got the information via

a city records request. l.a. inspector general is investigating whether it was a negligent release. >> i'm concerned the department's recent release of information will cause even more officers to leave. great cities like san francisco and new york are also offering varying incentives to hire more police. >> the changes we seek requested city of minneapolis is largely credited with amplifying the fund police movement after georgia floyd's movement in 2020. following years crime surged in that city and the police department shrank so rapidly minneapolis began recruiting officers from other meanest apologies. the minneapolis police tells a boxer pulling in officers is hard as the profession has been demonized in their city. pre-flood department set it 878. today it is down to 542 officers, roughly over only 260 of them are assigned to 911 patrol for the entire city. neil: met defendant thank you my

friend but let's go to howard safir former police commissioner. i look at the statistics in major cities and you look at this crime situation in a variety of ways. a lot of the big city mayors say crime is still a problem some of the serious crimes the one that you see in a video and all the rest the shooting incident the transit incidents, to a major city they are down. they like to point out the serious stuff is going our way we are still paying attention to the other stuff. but argent they jumping too soon on a month or two worth of data? >> a month is not a trend. and it is down far enough. certainly up from pre-pandemic issues. the fact is we have mayors and district attorneys who are progressive who think they can socialize their way out of crime when trained police officers on

the street. neil: if they don't and it didn't seem to be a different tone coming up on the big city mayors the severity of the crime problem. a lot of businesses are moving out of areas, they're blaming crime for closing four stores in chicago but it's not exactly a secret that was a compelling reason to shut them down. others are doing it. when you lose a business and you lose money that changes minds, doesn't it? >> it certainly does. the people who are affected the most are in the underserved communities. in the high crime communities they are going to find themselves without the kind of stores and facilities that they need to leave their lives. the fact is if you have a district attorney like you haven't l.a. or district attorney like you have a new york you have a mayor like you have in chicago were they just voted against get rid of crime

candidate, you're going to reap what you sow. that fact is when a defendant movement came out we all said within a year or two this is going to be a disaster, and it is. they're offering $25000 as a bonus to report someone as a police officer this is all a message. policing is a profession have been dedicated and have a passion for. within the big corruption is issues. >> isn't as simple as police still feel appreciator furthermore they are targets there one smart phone from losing a job are going to jail. proper action if they go too f far. but another senate there is not on their site as it used to be isn't that what is driving this departure? >> it certainly is. everyone has a video camera

officers are considered guilty they take away qualified immunity. police are being prosecuted as criminals in some cities. it sends the wrong message and quite honestly i would not have someone to become a police officer until things turn ar around. i was a little encourage i saw one potential candidate for mayor in los angeles is running strictly on i'm going to take back the streets and have a district attorney who processes and does his job or that is what we need. it will understand not something socialize. there are certain people who need to be off the street and they are the majority of people committing all these crimes. because you reminded me they can sense a void or weakness in leadership and take full advantage of her.

something's got to change. howard thank you very much. >> good to be with you, neil. there is earth day it seems for a good thing to be aware the plan to take care of it. all of the green behind him

600 some celebrated others and vandalized over. laura engel on the latter problem in massachusetts, laura. >> this climate activism and hitting neighborhoods with so-called gas guzzlers all over the world since march of last year. and now the group known as the tire extinguishers choosing boston to try to persuade those with suvs to change their ways to something more environmentally friendly.

the group claims they deflated the tires of 43 suvs parked in the posh beacon hill neighborhood wednesday night because of the amount of large luxury gas powered suvs. the tire extinguishers are global activists who say they have deflated more than 10,000 tires since march of 2022 including 40 stb tires recently in belgium. the group, leaving flyers on vehicle wind chill to inform onerous about why their vehicle was targeted. imploring them to switch to public transportation, biking, or smaller compact electric and hybrid cars. boston police tell us they are investing the vandalism of multiple vehicles. one man telling police he was unable to get to a doctor's appointment because of his flat tire. one woman said her parents were hit they did not have anywhere to go but that a firefighter and at the local hospital had trouble getting into work. >> them all for taking to help save the environment. i just don't know destroying

people's personal property or damaging people's personal property is the way to do a pair. >> the group said they are targeting the wealthy because they believe they are contributing to the climate crisis and causing the current future deaths of the less fortunate. neil: laurent thank you. in the meantime the administration making it clear where it stands is environmental push, trying to make it to any legislation on any type of federal agency work to incorporate what it calls environmental justice for all. some have been saying to go green we have to spend a lot more green. in the case of aoc and other sympathetic to this progressive cause, trillions of dollars over the years. money well spent they say. jonas, what do you think of that money well spent? were right up against a debt ceiling we don't really have much more money to spend. how do you see it? >> or deflategate over them to

draw massive spending part of this point in the budget or borrowing that even if there is a debt limit. the problem with the green agenda you have to address the fact you basically have to lead to less consumption often for poor people. this comes as a conflicting message i didn't send it environmental justice order. you have to take away things from people that cannot consume all the gas they want and all other things work i'm having more than other countries. that cannot exist if you are serious about a green new agenda for the trying to cut paper over that and act like if we give you money to buy a luxury green car as opposed to when you let the air out of its master going to go in and you can have all the things you want for the reality is a strict environment the policy means we have to consume less. that means the mass of people not just tax on the wealthy, they not consume as much they consume more per person but there's not that many of them. it's everybody else can have a

car, everybody else can have a truck or they have to dress that head on and explain how the going to lead to this and how the average person is not going to feel the sting of that or the cost. neil: a big worry people have a gazette gives china's advantage. not only is it the memes by which all e visa must pass on some of the key ingredients to that. but it is getting a pass on commitments in environmental commitments and convoys like china and india are not signing on to some the so-called sacrifices you have to make for the planet. and here we are trying to the good thing given the benefit of the doubt to a cause. but sticking the american people. >> you better believe that, neil. you look at what china is doing right now. their pollution levels are thren the united states even if the united states did not exist as a

country it would not have much impact on global omission because countries like china and india are polluting so much. donald trump is a talk about other countries laughing behind our backs. there is no question china and the leaders in beijing are laughing behind our back. but it very simply doesn't care about climate change. the communist rules and try not about taking over the world. we are surrendering our energy leadership as a result of these crazy environmental packs. one other quick point you want to help poor people in the united states do better? how about getting them a car? every study shows when poor people have transportation, meaning a car, they do better. who pays the tax? who is paying for the gas prices and so on the great taxes and the people are trying to help.

neil: the other issue is whether this is being forced down our throat but we all want to clean planet, clean air, clean water i get that in the push for electric vehicles. there is a chasm between the cost of those in the cost of gas powered vehicles. now elon musk comes along and lowers the prices of a lot of his cars six times in a row. i think the latest he hiked the price. right now the gap is still yawning. i am wondering until that changes on one if you have an ev america, not even close. what you think? >> am glad china came up of this discussion. first about lowering the price because jeff get the new credit you cannot just buy a 100,000-dollar electric car like he used to be able to get a credit which is absurd when you can have two main dollars in income to get a correct credit. had to lower the income but the battery still cost 10 -- $15000 economic that discrepancy go away and the batteries last forever. you have to replace it.

the only way to make that work is huge you vittert have hundred dollars to buy a car's not going to go where that gas prices significantly going up to equalize that. you can argument the china problem i would argue china has made more environmental sense than our half-baked democratic agenda. they have the high-speed trains that kicked out the dirty crypto money in which we adopted. we do not let cars in his unit labor in america a lot of electric cars to qualify the credit. we have a huge tariff on chinese panels. i understand trading with china and they are all evil. if your goal is lowering consumer carbon production of the cheapest solar panels and the cheapest electric cars you can get. not ones it also appeared to your union pro agenda. which do you care about question rejoined to raise wages and inflation are joint to lower carbon production? going to lower you need the

cheapest solar panels come into the country the cheapest cars everything else is going to require more taxpayer assisted handouts to adjust for the trade barrier follow it china does make some sense on environmental policy. neil: why can't we be all in on everything? we had the traditional sources a lot of the ev stuff is attractive and all. dive in? >> american energy try to make so much sense. we have trillions and trillions of dollars of oil, gas, coal. we are sitting under a treasure chest of energy in this country. how about this or why not build more nuclear plants in this country which admit no carbon emissions for the left is against that too. one other quick point you know who's taking advantage of the

7500-dollar credits for buying a tesla? rich people are buried poor people are not doing it. it's a most aggressive policy. neil: it is a weird one it is weird for judgment on think you both a very electric conversation i preach at that, guys. in the meantime you are taking a look at having good credit and paying dearly for it. not in a good way. a bad way. we will explain after this. when bucket lists need checking... points need redeeming... work trips need crushing... or anniversaries need... celebrating? no matter who you are, where you're going, or why. with 24 trusted brands by wyndham to choose from... your wyndham is waiting. get the lowest price at wyndhamhotels.com f-r-e-e. e-x-a-m.

oh. yeah. free exam. at america's best, you get a free, quality eye exam when you buy two pairs of glasses starting at just $79.95. the exam alone is worth at least fifty-nine bucks. who wouldn't like to save that? two pairs and a free exam starting at just $79.95. book an exam today at americasbest.com. the chase ink business premier card is made for people like sam who make...? ...everyday products... ...designed smarter. like a smart coffee grinder - that orders fresh beans for you. oh, genius! for more breakthroughs like that... ...i need a breakthrough card... like ours! with 2.5% cash back on purchases of $5,000 or more... plus unlimited 2% cash back on all other purchases! and with greater spending potential, sam can keep making smart ideas... ...a brilliant reality! the ink business premier card from chase for business. make more of what's yours.

neil: good credit score and geared for a lot of things you are at lower rates on mortgages and loans of any sorts there are some changes coming up that could change that mightily those with not so great rates get a better deal at the expense of those with a great rates were not getting the good deal. edward lawrence has more. starting may 1 mortgage fees on home loans backed by freddie. >> and fannie mae for people with poor credit will become significantly lower while fees

at job for people with good credit for the former ceo of the mortgage bankers association says this is essentially subsidizes those with risky credit. >> it is a bad policy step it lacks integrity. and that is not how was make a house in policy should not include tinkering by a regulator for their own social or political purposes at a time like this. >> for example a person with a 625 fica score down payment of 5% if they one and three-quarter fee discount on a 30 year mortgage. but those with a score of 740 or above with 15 -- 20% down will see an increase of 75% in fees from the current level. these supply to people of all income levels. as you have a high credit score you have to pay more? we are talking real money this could be $100 a month or more depending upon the size of your loan. makes no sense paper bill whose family found when the largest home building companies were a

sea of fee structure will allow more home loans to people who have trouble paying their bills starting another house and collapsed. >> you got to watch it very carefully. i will say though a lot of the builders they want to make sure mortgage standards are tight. the obviously controlled the mortgage volume payment comes the builders are going to be very, very careful records how spokesperson telling fox this will promote first-time home ownership adding this will help people that were locked out of buying a home because of fees, to achieve their dream. at the white house edward lawrence foxbusiness. >> erwin the big housing meltdown collective bargaining mortgages they cannot really afford there were loans and it got out of control in every went co- blue it? my next guest fears this is setting the stage for that, aftemeowr this. car loans can be expensive and the payments high. consolidate that car loan into a newday home loan and save hundreds every month.

my most important kitchen tool? my brain. so i choose neuriva plus. unlike some others, neuriva plus is a multitasker supporting 6 key indicators of brain health. to help keep me sharp. neuriva: think bigger.

neil: all right, the goal is decent i guess. help those with lower credit ratings secure a mortgage. but to do so at the expense of those good credit ratings and indeed have them pay more, could that be a set up for another housing meltdown if it gets out of control? real estate broker, what she thanks of this. that is the worry, right? good intentions could go awry when you think of? >> that is the worry i feel like were back in 2006 what we are giving people who are unqualified the ability to take on a mortgage and buy a home. and now we are actually rewarding them with better mortgage terms and hurting people who have worked so very hard to build their credit score. it makes no sense at all. we look back at what debt management it is is the ability to manage debt.

people with a lower credit score does not mean they are bad people it just means they don't know how to pay their bills appropriately. they do not how to manage their debt. so instead of giving them some the biggest debt they will ever have in their entire lifetime which is eight mortgage on a home, for most americans as a biggest purchase they will ever make in their entire lifetime. and now are going to put more debt onto these people and prevent them from having any type any chance of financial success and financial freedom in the future. i. neil: normally goes with that i'm sorry but normally those with a lot of debt you might be able to get a mortgage it might get a higher rate it might've more stringent qualifications attached to it. that's the breaks that's the reality. those have a better financial position applying for a mortgage or home equity loan will not have to endure that. but that is the way this is typically handled if they get

mortgages or financing at all. if we turn that around and reward those who had that risk and those who don't, we could be setting ourselves up for something bad. plus one 100%. not only that you're going to discourage people who do have a great credit score from buying. someone like me i have well over 700 credit score but now i know i'm going have to pay more per month because i am helping out somebody who may be has a 500 credit score? that is really discouraging but it is frustrating why did i spend all of my time doing that? i feel like so many people can relate to that. why did they make such an effort to begin with? i sell homes for a living of course i want more people to buy homes. because again that will inevitably make it back to 2006 again. that will hurt everyone. whether you have good score or bad score will be hurt by this.

this just isn't for you galore on the spectrum we won't look at all what you tell them? >> it just depends. if it is not for them as far as hey i have a budget of 500,000. or i have a budget of a million. now were looking at places that are hundreds of thousands of dollars more. obviously this is not the right house for them. you should not be overstretching. you should not be over at leveraging your self and that is at a price standpoint. that's not because of a certain credit score. people need to sit back in the market. it's coming back to a normal market. i know prices have been slightly in the slowly coming down for existing home sales are down 2.4% month over month 22% annually. we are kind of seeing things head back into a normal market. sellers are being more

negotiable buyers to not do pay a list of prices. >> this could mess that up. sam, thank you. we will see what happens. very good having you on. in the meantime take a look at our border provision of title 42 is about two and i hate to break it to you, the surgeon is about to start. ...

>> president biden is said to be planning to make it finally official come tuesday, that's when he's going to announce that he is indeed running for reelection in what should be the biggest nonsurprise in human history, or at least over the last week and we're listening this is from robert f. kennedy, jr., and announcing his challenge to biden, and did this have to do with that. the rfk generation here and

wh