>> sean: we have a great crowd tonight. programming note we will be doing another live audience show tomorrow night. james comer, michele tafoya, lisa boothe, tom sha lieu, marianne williamson, tommy lahren. if you want to be part of the show go to hannity.com. tickets are $1 million apiece. actually they're foally free. come join us, that's all the time we have. at the time your dvr. let not your heart be troubled. let's give it up for laura ingraham [cheers and applause]. >> laura: i thought hannity that you said that jim comey -- i thought you said jim comey's coming on the show. i was like wow, comey's coming on the show. >> sean: did i say comey? >> laura: no, i thought you said that and i thought hannity is beating me again to the booking. mccabe will body next. awesome show we'll pig it up where you left off. >> sean: do we all love laura?

>> laura: i'll see you in a couple weeks >> i'm laura ingraham this is the ingraham angle back in washington tonight and also part two of my san francisco sabotage expose. we're going tell the story of what it's like living in a city that is absolutely inundated by crime and drugs. we're going to tell it through the eyes of one bay city resident. and with the help of meticulously poured over surveillance video, we show you each night how one neighbor is left in constant terror. but first. >> president is not above the law. justice serves the people. it doesn't protect the powerful. >> american democracy only works only if we choose to respect the rule of law. >> we have to uphold the rule of law and restore trust in our institutions and democracy. >> laura: is there anyone left

among the democrats who actually cares about the rule of law? about equal standards of justice and accountability? well, a better question might be, does anyone at the fbi care? earlier this afternoon we learned that a whistle blower has alleged that then vp biden was at the center of a bribery scheme involving a foreign power. yes, bribery. house committee oversight chair chuck comer and chuck grassley learned the fbi is in possession of at least one document that claim that biden and a foreign national were part of this bribery scandal. now, this revealed in a letter, the two republicans sent a notice to the department of justice demanding this record and answers about what, if anything, the fbi did to pursue the matter. now this record reportedly details an alleged deal that involved the exchange of money for policy decisions. >> we have credible information that this possible criminal

activity took place, and i can't verify whether or not it's really a criminal activity, but i do did have faith in the whistle blowers that bring it to me, that this document exists. >> and you say that this whistle blower is very credible. >> well, i think you've got to go by what i have been able to expose from wrong doing by the fbi or the department of justice from various whistle blowers, that none of it has been refuted or contradicted. >> laura: grassley is very serious about these types of matters. not a fly by night. comer and grassley are specifically seeking an fbi interview record or a case file from june of 2020. and they're seeking any files created or modified during that month containing the term biden and along with any attachments containing the term biden.

that's a lot of documents. but wait a wilmington minute. why would any of us think that joe biden would be anything but above board when dealing with foreign officials? i mean, after all he's our great protect or of democracy and the rule of law. >> we can be for giving believing the president's more spay power than in principle. >> he's preparing and sweeping away all the guardrails that long protected our democracy. >> laura: oh, the guardrails. well, here's the truth. donald trump made his four tune in business long before going into politics. but somehow the bidens got rich when joe served in government for almost five decades. how have the bidens gotten so wealthy? now what on earth could explain such an aggressive lack of media curiosity about that question? hmm. well, imagine where america would be if the media spent one

1,000th of the time and energy covering and unpacking the biden sleazy self dealing as they did trump's new york pre politics business life. we know joe wouldn't be president would he? we know in america today your political views will determine the standard of justice you actually receive. so you stand with the left and you usually are protected and you escape. stand with america and challenge the swamp and you're toast. now even if this bribery charge, charges, are true, it's really doubtful, don't you think, that anyone at, say, the new york times is going to really care or they're going to demand biden answer all questions about this matter? as usual, this is about money and power, keeping both all to themself. joining me now is florida congressman byron donald house oversight committee member. congressman, what are your initial thoughts on this? the fbi as an institution, the democrats now, which they used

to question the fbi decades ago, but now the democrats basically are saying the fbi can do no wrong when it involves joe biden. >> my initial thoughts are, i'm simply not surprised. lauer awe've been going at this investigation into the oversight committee for months now. a couple of weeks ago i was at the treasury department reviewing some of the financial documents associated with things that hunter biden and jim biden have been involved in. and at any point throughout this entire situation, you could never get anybody who just uses basic common sense to actually believe that joe biden had no idea what his brother and his son was doing. now the whistle blower has come forward, apparently fbi has documented this, and has looked into this, and the american people need to know, they need to see if their president is compromised by foreign nations

because he and his family wanted to make money off of his political power that he has amassed over 50 years in government. >> laura: how did the bidens get so rich? that's just a simple question. we know how donald trump got rich. we know obama got a big netflix deal for about a hundred million dollars or so after he left office. but how did the bidens get so rich? now the white house responded to the whistle blower allegations today in a statement, congressman saying for going on five years now republicans in congress have had politically motivated attacks to the the and his family. when it cops to president biden's personal finances he's offered an unprecedented level of transparency. congressman is this a joke? how did the bidens get so rich. >> it's an absolute joke what came out of the white house today. let's be very clear they've made their money on political grift. you have the brother, you have the son. they're on air force 2 running

around the globe meeting with foreign leaders. then all of a sudden these other countries and the things that will help them actually increase their power economically are starting to happen in the united states? give me a break. listen the congressional salary is pretty good but it's not a millionaires salary or a billionaires salary but they have houses in all over the country, they're in all the jets doing all the stuff. you do the math. hunter biden doesn't have any actual economic credentials. jim biden has no economic credentials that i can see, and joe biden's been a senator and a vice-president. everybody can see exactly what's happening here. but the political left and the big media don't care because it's about the agenda regardless of what it actually means for the united states of america. >> laura: and big business doesn't care as long as he keeps cozying up to china a and opening the border they're fine with that. speaking of that, asked about the latest news today and the scandal. watch this. >> we have a report on the doj

nearing a decision on whether to charge president biden's son hunter with tax and gun related violations. i wonder if the white house has any comment on this case, if it's something the president has been following, or if he talks to hunter about this case at all. >> i would have to refer you to you the department of justice, okay? >> laura: send it to the doj, so, what, they can stonewall? i mean you're not getting answers from them. >> listen, we all see what's happening here, karine jean-pierre's got nothing to say because the only thing that she can say is damning. again, any father would know what his son is doing in his business dealing. i've got three sons, i know what they're up to, i know what they're doing. this is corruption at the highest level because the president of the united states, his job has been compromised by the dealings of his son. the son didn't hop on an energy board names burisma just because of his intellect because he doesn't know anything in energy. it was because his daddy was a

senator and then a vice-president. that's what's going on here. and it's time for us to uncover this corruption once and for all. because, frankly, it's the american people that suffer as a result. and so, of course, karine jean-pierre has nothing to say. >> laura: well, she's just a mouth piece or a figure head. i said this before, this is not a hunter biden scandal, this is a joe biden scandal. the focus on hunter and his stupid paintings and his love child. this is a joe biden scandal. congressman, great to see you. thank you >> now the fbi predictably provided no comment today but given the documents in question are from june of 2020, all right, the summer of love, are we looking at yet another example of interference by governmental agencies ahead of the 2020 election. joining me now is steve friend, senior fellow at to the center for row newing america, author of true blue my journey from beat cop to suspended fbi whistle blower. he revealed unproper practices in the fbi relateded to

january 6th. steve. >> comer and grassley working together both seeking this document known as, i believe it's fd-1023 which is a source report. explain to our viewers, if you will, why that's significant. >> well, an fd-1023 is a source report that memorializes communication between an fbi agent and a confidential human source, an informant. so that could be in person, it could be telephone, it could be e-mail. some sort of communication that went on. and the specificity that congressman comer was requesting, this june 2020, implies that there was a meeting or some sort of communication that transpired in that month leading up to the presidential election between an fbi agent and informant and pertained to joe biden's dwight pro quo that went on during his vice-presidency. >> laura: now it could have been an anonymous e-mail, right? could have been an e-mail, might

have been a phone call tip, we don't know, it's just the report itself memorializing the interaction sis that right. >> yes, and in my experience, anytime that i had an actual informant on my books, somebody who had their code name and we vetteded and done a background check that they were able to be an informant for the fbi, any communication or comment i had with that individual was recordedd in a 1023 so it could be someone who is a current informant for the fbi. >> laura: now, at that point, what happens? would they typically do an investigation if it seems initial lie like outlandish? would they let it go? what's the standard for proceeding after that initial contact with the whistle blower. >> that's the million dollar question in this case because if it was, in fact, a legitimate complaint brought forward you would hope the fbi agent would take that information, conduct a preliminary assessment or might lead to an actual full

investigation from the fbi's standpoint. doesn't appear that they've come forward with anything and if the fbi hides behind can't comment on an ongoing investigation, then we know that one does exist. if there isn't one, then there's no excuse for them not to come out with that. it is now incumbent on the fbi which stands to protect the constitution, preserve the rule of law, they have to be transparent with the american people. they have to expose if there was in fact any sort of investigation that's ruled out that's legitimate that should be shared and exonerate the current sitting president. if there is one on the books and being investigated that's also important. that we need to be as transparent as possible with the american people that let them know potentially the leader of the free world could be involved in a quid pro quo that was to his own personal benefit. >> laura: you said it, quid pro quo. if that had come out and if there's a legitimate underlying claim with real information, and

that had come out in the summer of 2020, that would have likely had some effect, to put it mildly, some effect on the election, and it could have been, you know, completely transformative effect on the election, could it not have? >> without question. all you have to do is look back four years earlier when jim comey felt compelled to step forward and say no reasonably prosecutors would bring charges against then candidate hillary clinton. certainly the timing works to be very similar and the fallout i think the fbi felt quite a political kickback at them from the left side of the aisle after that, and i think there was probably some fear about that. and my concern at this point is, there might have been information taken down and instead of actually opening up a full investigation, it was essentially hidden in a source reporting document. and maybe this whistle blower has now felt compelled to share that with the american schnabel so your kern is that it was deep

6ed. >> absolutely and it isn't going to be incumbent on the oversight committee to look at that information, actually determine that this source document exists and if it does look at the information that was provided. put that first and foremost instead of looking at the motivations of a whistle blower let's look for the first time ever of the merits and voracity of what they brought forward what they're compelled to do. >> laura: you bet the smearing of whistle blowers is new on the left, you know a lot about that. thank you so much >> speaking of potential fbi corruption, i have some outstanding questions tonight. are they, as steve just referenced, purposely gumming up the release of information? like the nashville shooter's manifesto, let's move to that topic. the angle has been demanding the release of that since the day of the shooting. yet here we are five weeks after

audrey hill killed six people including three kids and we don't know any details. there were 30 journals a suicide note a memoir, apparently multiple laptops, phones, notes, all taken from the trans shooter's house. now all vital, are they not, to determining the motive and perhaps preventing another shooting in the future? >> let people read what this person has written and, in fact, know what to look for in co-workers and fellow students and friends and family. maybe they'll see some of these indicators that were man fested by this person. what politicians inspired this lunatics? what drugs was she prescribed? who prescribed those drugs? these are all very important questions that i think will be answered in the manifesto. >> we know why they don't want this to be made public. because there might be evidence that this was a hate crime inspired by a trans ideology

against christians. >> laura: late last week there were whispers that the manifesto would be released. we even got word late last week that the review was in the final stages before the entire thing, or most of it, was released for the public. but then today, out of the blue, we got another message from police saying, due to pending litigation filed this week, the metropolitan nashville police department has been advised by council to hold in obeyens the release of records relateded to the shooting at the covenant school pending orders or direction of the court. no details, though, about who's filed litigation or where it's pending, what it involves. but just yesterday the tennessee firearms association and former local sheriff did file a lawsuit against police for their delay in releasing the writings. hmm. will we ever get the truth here? this one comment made by my angle guest and retired fbi

supervisory personnel agent james fitzgerald on the night of the shootings has stuck with me. >> i have a feeling there may be some doj participation in this. they may not want this kind of -- these kind of writings going out. it would destroy a bunch of narratives that this present administration has. so i wouldn't be surprised if this manifesto and these other writings are kept very close to the vest. >> laura: the angle has reached out to authorities for more clarification on this. we get answers we're going to bring them to you. but we're not going to allow them to rest on some bogus claim of a pending litigation in order to continue to hide the truth from the victims, their families and the public. we all deserve to know >> up next, with the lifting of title 42 just a week away, texas governor greg abbott approved the shipment of more illegals to sanctuary cities across the country and for doing that he was called a racist by mayors

lightfoot and adams in new york. he's here exclusively to respond to them. plus new names found in the calendar of deceased sex freak jeff epstein but there's one in particular that caught our eye. we'll tell you who it is in moments.

♪ >> laura: now, as countless, thousands of illegal aliens are amazing at our borders ready to cross the moment title 42 ends thousands more are pouring across right now. in the last 10 days according to the border control union there's been a 700% increase in apprehensions during a normal day in the obama and trump administrations. on average there have been 7,700 arrests per day. agents are even encountering large numbers of people from india, china brazil afghanistan and so many other countries that you can see the list on the screen right now. it's mind boggling. meanwhile the war between texas governor greg abbott and big city liberal mayors, that's heating up. >> problem by simply sticking people on buses. we are completely tapped out. we have no more space, no more resources. we are literally full.

>> no one should use human beings as political pawns. i cannot ignore the fact that governor and sot sent migrants only to cities where there are black mayors. >> laura: joining me now texas governor greg abbott. governor, your response to eric adams that, at the core of your policy, is racism. >> it's kind of odd, really, laura, because new york and chicago, they are self-declared sanctuary cities. so you think they would be asking for me to be bussing migrants to their cities. the fact of the matter is, laura, that there are more people coming across the border every single day than there are migrants that are in chicago or new york. and this is not a texas problem, this is a united states problem. and it's the responsibility of new york and chicago and the entire country to deal with the problem caused by joe biden and joe biden's open border policies. as you have said before, we can never forget the way it was just

a few years ago under president trump. we were at multi decade lows in the number of people coming across the border. now we're at record breaking highs and it will get worse when title 42 is repealed and the border's are opened up. and so chicago, new york, and other cities, they need to step up and help out in this crisis caused by joe biden. >> laura: now, governor, right before you joined us tonight, adams went on cnn and doubled down on his remarks. we just got 'em in. watch. >> i don't know if it's to undermine these large cities that are run by black mayors because of his political agenda. i don't know if he's doing it because of race. i'm giving the facts. we have 108,000 cities in america. look where he sent them to. >> laura: your response to the mayor that you're targeting these cities. >> actually, their cities are chosen, they're the chosen cities by the migrants

themselves. understand this, every one of these migrants who get on a bus, they volunteer to go and they choose the city they go to. they want to go to new york. they want to go to chicago, and these other cities. and so this is a complete voluntary process where, again, we are sending them to sanctuary cities that are embracing and welcoming these migrants who have come across the border. >> laura: now, governor, everyone thought this was, oh, biden's sending troops to the border. i think there's already 2500 troops there doing, you know, more clerical work and processing work. we don't need to play the press secretary on this. but what do people need to know about these troops are actually do? >> let's be clear. joe biden said that he's sending 1500 military troops to the border. but in that same order, said that they would be doing paperwork. laura, the last thing we need are troops on the border doing

paperwork. we need more border patrol officerers. we need the real united states military to go down to the border and take the action that president trump would have taken. >> laura: well, governor, this is a massive human tragedy, and a danger to our country's security. do we have any way of really knowing who most of these people are? a lot of them don't even have ids. >> well, so many of them do not have ids but laura the most dangerous part about it, as you know, is the fact that in the past year, there have been apprehended about a hundred people who are on the terrorist watch list. and you know the people on the terrorist watch list they pay extra to not be apprehended. so who knows how many terrorists have come across our border and are going around the united states of america. the top duty of the president of the united states is national security. and joe biden has failed at that top duty on our southern border. >> laura: yes or no, is this an

impeachable offense, what he's done to this border? >> i believe it is. laura, he is failing to fulfill the duties of his office, his executive powers. he's not executing the immigration laws passed by the united states congress. i believe it is an impeachable offense. >> laura: governor, thank you so much >> now, more bomb shells tonight from jeffrey epstein's private calendar. a few days ago we learned about a series of meetings that took place between the disgraced financier and a gaggle of high profile political individuals including obama's would you say council. shocking this all occurred after the pervert had served times for soli soliciting sex with minors and other charges. two days ago we brought you a report from the wall street journal with those individuals. today they published part two who labeled more individuals who felt either time to seek either

counsel, advice, friendship or some other help from the sex flown. those include former clinton secretary and harvard president larry summers apparently more than a dozen meetings scheduled with epstein from 2013-2016. apparently even requesting donate to his wife's poetry project. film director woody allen, according to the journal he and epstein were scheduled to get together nearly every month in both 2014 and 2015. and then there were at least three dozen meetings between epstein and former israeli prime minister a hued barack between 2013 and 2017. but perhaps the most interest aring epstein pal of all was billionaire venture capitalist and linked co-founder reed hoffman. he visited epstein's private island in the caribbean and was scheduled to stay over at that creepy manhattan town house in

2014. in 2018 hoffman was forceded to issue an apology for funding a group that smeared alabama roy moore strongly applying the russian government was backing moore against doug jones. hoffman is the same man who's funding e. jean carroll's lawsuit against president trump. what's his justification, supporting woman fighting progress and justice has been a long standing priority of his. so buddying up to epstein and supporting women's rights? give me a break. just the typical double speak from the left's phoney virtue signalers >> barbie releasing a doll or two and so is the navy and fair to use artificial intelligence in political ads? raymond arroyo has the answers, seen and unseen next. of like mid people ready to support you when you need it most? christian healthcare ministries is an organization

with over 40 years of trusted care who understands the importance of family. a group that sees you for who you are regardless of your health history. offering affordable healthcare cost solutions that could save you up to 40% on your healthcare costs. learn more today at your chm dot org about healthcare that puts you in control.

(upbeat music) - [narrator] what if there was a hearing aid that could keep up with you? (notification dings) this is jabra enhance select. it's a smart hearing solution

that makes hearing aids more convenient and less expensive. it connects with your phone so you can stream calls and music. with jabra enhance select's premium package, better hearing doesn't have to start in a doctor's office. it starts with a free online hearing test you could take almost anywhere, so you can get your hearing aids custom programed for you and delivered in days. from there, you can fine tune your settings with your remote audiology team seven days a week, so your hearing aids work when it matters most. (notification dings) in fact, more than 95% of enhance select premium customers report hearing better with their friends, family, and colleagues. with jabra enhance select, you can get the same advanced hearing aid technology and professional care you expect from a clinic at a fraction of the cost. try at risk free for 100 days. visit jabraenhance.com.

>> laura: time for our seen and unseen segment we reveal the

stories behind the headlines and for that we turn to fox news contributor raymond arroyo. all right raymond, let's start with this new slate, very exciting of barbie dolls hitting the market. >> well, laura, mattel is unveiling some new dolls to represent everyone. >> we've continued to increase our commitment to representation with a variety of dolls. >> the addition of the barbie with down's syndrome was created to allow more children to find a doll that represents them. >> laura, it's about time that barbie represented these precious people. >> laura: that's great. >> you know, they're often ignored. i'm glad barbie's doing this. to mark asian american and pacific islander month they're now announcing a new anna may wong doll also a doll to elevate cognitive loss in elderly care awareness. >> laura: that's beautiful. >> at so special that it even talks laura. >> the best way to get something done, if you hold near and dear

to you that you like to be able to -- anyway. >> what's he saying kids? just pull the string again and see if you can figure it out. imagine the hours of family fun, laura. >> laura: you know, raymond at mass this morning there was a father and a son with down's syndrome, and he was so precious and he was singing and looking for the hymns and he was such a beautiful boy and just seeing him interact with his brother, and i think that's wonderful. aim really glad they did that. >> i agree i'm glad they're celebrating that. and actually something children need and would be drawn to. >> laura: you bet. >> no agenda or sideline. the biden doll was our own little deep fake but now artificial intelligence generated images are becoming the norm in political ads. the gop just released this one with ai and china overtaking

taiwan. now progressives are using ai to literally drag their opponents. >> a month ago a new instagram page gassed called republicans. already 246,000 followers and dozens ai images of republican lawmakers dressed in drag. >> it's meant to really call out the hypocrisy of the gop. >> now, laura, to be a hypocrite the person in question would actually have to engage in the thing they're decrying. near as we know none of these men actually cross dressed except on this guy's computer. look, all of this is like being thrown in the middle of ready player one, only we aren't ready for this world we're encountering and it's very dangerous when you're talking about elections. something needs to be done here. >> laura: yeah. i mean, it's clearly not satire. he's clearly using it as a substantive political attack. so at that point, there's going to be a lot of soul searching on

this kind of stuff. >> there's a democratic congresswoman i agree with her she wants warnings on these ads on any ai created image so it's clear this is a fake. we're going to need that in political ads particularly late in a campaign season. and the navy is apparently going all in now laura not only reputations but in drag queens. no an effort to boost recruitment they appointed yeoman second class joshua kelly as an official digital ambassador. anchors away. >> i receive attention just being myself on a daily because being queer, being non-binary, someone such as myself on the regular gets stared at. >> i'm on the top of my game, up there with the big dogs, girls, come on, leave the world to the ♪ ♪ >> he calls himself harpy daniels laura, the navy claims they employ harpy to attract a wide range of poe pensional

candidates in are they going to stand on the ship and outdrag the chinese? and why drag queen? why is everything drag queens? why not mimes or gots or clowns? there are a thousand different groups and performers that the navy and everybody else could reach out to. i don't understand this kind of binary tract if you will. >> laura: well, you know, my question is, what would admiral nimitz or admiral charles hughes think of what's happened to the united states of america. that's what i wonder, those great men and everything they sacrificed >> all right raymond thank you. and raymond is by the way in tennessee right now, he spoke to nashville's natives about how the police are suppressing the covenant shooter's manifest tow plus more plus signing the edison book this saturday at 11:00 a.m. up next part two of my series about how san francisco the city by the bay became a city of

decay. tonight how pervasive home burglary is and police are doing nothing to stop it. my exclusive report and one man's story next.

♪ >> laura: now, many of us take for granted feeling safe in our

own homes. but many san francisco residents have had that feeling of safety shattered. now, i talked to a lot of people during my time there and it's just heart breaking. the way they're feeling. and they don't have the support from their political leadership, all democrats, or even the police. they're overwhelmed. now, where's their representation? you don't hear anything from nancy pelosi unless it's involving her family. it's her city, too. she lives there. why are so many people struggling so badly? why are the streets filled wind despair? why do residents have to pay for private security to protect themselves in their own homes? i spoke to one homeowner who had to do just that after his house was broken into nearly a dozen times. his story was first reported by independent journalist lee fang. >> the bottom line is, i don't feel safe in my own home. >> you may have heard about the crime here in san francisco, the

assaults on the streets the targeting of asian americans, the klausing of stores because they can't keep items on the shelves, they're being stolen. but what about individual homeowners, people who are investing in the city maybe renovating a house or doing an entire reconstruction of a home? how are they making it? we decided to talk to one homeowner, a tech entrepreneur, who has been burglarized not once, not twice, not three times during his reconstruction project, but over the past three years alone, he's been burglarized 10 times. how is he dealing with this? and what's the future if afc if this crime problem does not get involved? >> so my first break-in when i was living here was in the summer of 2020. in total i've had 10 break-ins. >> laura: ten break-ins some less than three years? >> yeah, actually. yeah. >> laura: what are they looking for? >> valuable things, you know,

something they can sell. and it's getting more intense. it's getting scarier and it's constant. >> laura: ben cook grew up in rural kentucky and came to san francisco more than 20 years ago to get his ph.d. he stayed because he fell in love with the city. >> i see you have the broken window in front. what is that from? >> that was a break-in earlier. i don't remember which one. >> laura: that's what it's come to there have been so many. >> it's hard to keep track. this is happening all the time. after the break-in and theft, i lost tens of thousands of dollars. my crew lost a lot of tools, a lot of valuable tools they need. and this fellow lost all of his tools, significant amount of money. i mean he's upset. >> laura: the most recent break-in at cook's home happened over the weekend. three incidents in a single day. you can see one of the thieves walking out of the house with a ladder stolen from the construction workers. >> the guy, who looked like he

may have been armed, broke in right there. you know, just a month or so ago there was an organized crew that came in the middle of the night. two vehicles, big crew of folks. they even took my washer and drier. that's big stuff. these folks knew what they were doing, they had a plan. they knew -- they had been watching us, that's what it felt like to me. >> laura: when you do call the police, what's their response? >> usually it would be, we'll call you back. you know? i called many, many times. i just -- i was shocked that there was no response whatsoever when there was a, you know, home invasion, there was someone there. there was a confrontation. fortunately, my guard, who -- i hired someone to sleep here at night because i knew the house is under constant threat. >> laura: wait a second.

you're building a house, you had to hire someone to be here, sleeping -- where are they sleeping? this is a construction site. >> yeah, and the heat -- it's not comfortable. space heater and an air mattress. >> sean: this is insane. >> it is insane. i'm not okay with it. i don't think it's okay. and i don't know what to do. i don't know how to feel safer. i don't know how to protect the things that i've worked har to get, you know? i hear stories from everybody. it's just a part of life here that you expect if you park your car outside a restaurant, you do he to dinner, there's a pretty good chance that a window will be broken when you come back. it's just -- you don't report it necessarily because you know there's not going to be a response. but i don't feel like that should be an acceptable part of life, that you should just not feel safe when you're out and not feel safe in your home.

>> laura: and yet you love this city. >> i do. it's beautiful. the main thing is it's full of brilliant ambitious people. people i don't feel like i'd meet anywhere else. i love my friends here, my network here. i'm committed to being here, obviously. >> laura: no matter what? no matter what happens? >> well -- >> laura: is there a limit for you? >> there are limits, you know? i can't afford to have full-time security staff outside the house just to feel safe at night. you know, that's crazy. i feel like i should expect a basic civic service of security, and i'm not getting it. >> laura: once this is finished, this project, i don't know how long it's going to take but got a little more work to do here, then what? are you going to feel safe then? >> everyone tells me, oh, once you're in, it will stop.

well, why should i believe that? you know, if there are no pre percussions, then why would they stop? i don't understand the logic behind that, you know? and, no, i don't feel safe. i'm doing lots of research now on the best security system i can get. i can't afford to have someone here at all times to prevent people coming in. that's crazy. >> laura: what's your view of the city going forward, if there is no significant change in law enforcement and actually pushing the criminals out and back? >> well, i don't know what to expect, but i can say, in my experience, and in the experience of people that i know and talk to, it's clearly getting worse. you know, steadily getting worse. and it's starting to get scary. and no one will do anything about it. i don't know what to do. i don't know what to do.

>> laura: our thanks to ben for telling his story. and a lot of people there do not know what to do. how about change the way you vote? >> all right, coming up one florida sheriff's deputy goes above and beyond his call of duty. the last bite explains. ♪

>> greg: all the leftists freaking out about justices thomas and gore serb. according to the daily wire we're learning that supreme court justice liberal sonia society mire declined to recuse herself from copyright cases including book publisher random house despite having been paid millions by penguin random house for books making it by far a little bit more of a concern of the appearance of impropriety. largest source of income for jus

justice sotomaier. we're not accusing anything we're saying you know what this is all about, the left hopes it is it's their way to move the supreme court to the left because they have to take down every institution left in america. that's it for us tonight don't forget set your dvr so you always say connected to us. thank you for watching. gutfeld is next. ♪ >> greg: yes! here we go. here we go. ha ha ha ha, yeah! oh, wow. knock it out [cheers and applause] >> greg: happy wednesday, america. now when you think of san francisco, what did you used to think of? cable