bridges. it is this. >> joey: eddie scarry, thank you for joining us and thank you -- >> thanks. >> joey: that is all for tonight. i want you to join us back here tomorrow for the show. we will tell you what to -- vote to tell you what to think but we will challenge those who do. have a great evening. sean hannity is next. >> sean: thank you. and welcome to. tonight, a big part about taking place on capitol hill. speaker kevin mccarthy and president joe biden have reached a tentative deal on the debt ceiling. not all republicans, not all democrats are on board. in fact, many are very outraged about the agreement. now coming up that we have former speaker of the house new greengrass. he supports the deal. and congressman and bishop. north carolina who does not. they will join us and debate the purported compromise. but here's what you need to know about the 99 page so-called fiscal responsibility act. including arguments on both sides. first, the name just so you know it means nothing. we already have over

$31 trillion in debt. and that massive tally continues to grow even after this bill. still, small government, congress, like steve moore, support the bill, calling it a step in the right direction. republican congressman on the other hand, chip roy, is referring to it as a turn sandwich. the washington times describes it as a win for the gop. trashing the deal for normalizing record spending with the president who can't find his parents. now some republican lawmakers, they are infuriated that the compromise maintains what is an unacceptably high level of covid era spending. and, in recovery purposes nearly $100 billion in spending instead of making outright points to the budget. this is a bill that pushes any further negotiation back into those until after the president election, which is a very key points of contention. many republicans want to get another negotiation for next

year's presidential election. they fear handing democrats a blank check if they keep the white house in 2024. here's what some republicans like about the bill. one and caps non-defense spending growth by no more than 1% in 2024. 2025. two, the bill -- callback $28 billion in unspent covid funds. three, it officially canceled by improper student loan because repayments now restarted at the end of the summer. but it does not end, the. and marginally expands work requirements for sources -- certain social programs like food stamps. 5522 biden in saying -- the plan to double the size of the irs. it will be cut by $1.4 billion a year. but a far cry for the republican bill that slashed the program completely. and according to cnn, another 20 billion will be repurposed in 2024, 2025, "this provision does not appear in the text of the bill but another source familiar with the deal said both sides

have agreed to." that means best case scenario is biden's iris expansion will still have around $60 billion to work with as conservatives points out, the budget cuts are small, not enough for some republicans. remember her got their cut 4.8 trillion also the work requirements, which those features a lot of exceptions and some believe that the courts are essentially windowdressing to a terrible bill. now, other republicans are for it. the republicans past the original bill again that saved 4.8 trillion over 10 years. this bill saves just over $2 trillion which is a record spending cut. now, apparently the bill also quotes some redtape around certain energy projects and expedites a pipeline in west virginia that is good for the energy sector in this country. now, of course, democrats, they are also livid about of the provisions. you have the far-left sierra club calling it a bad deal for the country. senator tim kaine attempting to now torpedoed the legislation in

the u.s. senate. if you have congresswoman cori bush now accusing her fellow lawmakers of "taking food out of vulnerable people's mouse." needless to say, democrats are not happy with this bill like some republicans are not. take a look. >> we are being held hostage because i am one of the people that his red nose has read all 100 pages of this bill and i have been asking questions for 3 days and there are things in this bill that i would clearly not support. >> reporter: will you vote in favor? >> i'm still undecided because i know we can't default. that we are in this position. >> i have some serious concerns about the deal and my team and i are still reviewing it. we just received the text last night. but one of the major concerns is on non-defense discretionary spending. another major problem is that joe manchin pipeline that we fought so hard to stop from being built. that is still a part of this bill. >> sean: no doubt many on both sides of the hour or happy or

unhappy about the "compromise" even though the bill was online for all to see and has advanced to committee. it is still subject to change with amendments and that complicates the agreement even more. and we have the so-called hard deadline which is not a hard deadline which janet yellen says is june the fifth. we do know one thing for sure. a primary holder of our debt is the communist party of china. and they do not fear. they do not respect this current president. this administration. because this week they spit in our faces yet once again and refused what was a polite invitation for our country's top defense officials to me in singapore. they said, sanogo. this also comes as china's neighbor, north korea, well, they just launched a space vehicle in preparation for the country's very first spy satellite which reportedly ended in failure. we can only hope. it is now more clear than i were under biden we are a train work both at home and abroad. china has declared a cold war against our country and we are

doing nothing to stop it. anyway, joining us know on the biden mccarthy debt ceiling compromise, a fox news contributor former speaker of the house newt gingrich along with north carolina congressman dan bishop is with us. all right, mr. speaker, you said this is a win for mccarthy. he just tweeted out it is the largest cut in history. to get their take on it. >> look, i think it is pretty straightforward. if you look at where we were going, which was the biden position of know amendments of any kind, no negotiations, just keep raising the debt ceiling, keep businesses as usual. you look where over 100 days, the house republicans who shocked the country by actually passing a bill that had real change, a real reform, we'll c cut. the truth is, we are not nearly as well off as we would like to be because we do not have a republican president to

negotiate with. we are automatically better off than we would have been if we just rolled over for joe biden. so the question i think the republicans and probably where it comes the deepest disagreement is the consequence of a no vote. i believe having done this as you know in my new book, much of the majority where i explain how we spent four years negotiating with bill clinton, getting to the only four years of a balanced budget in their lifetime. we did it take one step at a time. well, this is the first step. now, republicans can decide it is a pretty reasonable first step, not everything they want. but it starts the game towards the balanced budget. towards a appropriations as a fourth. josh, what is it fair to say -- >> establish the ceiling not a basement. down further. >> sean: right. is it fair to say that you believe based on your experience and you were the last speaker to

balance the budget to give her credit. i give you a lot of credit for that. that it has to be a process that in reality it is a process. what if the republicans just stood firm on their debt ceiling increase at the 4.8 trillion in savings over 10 years. what would happen then? >> biden would have said no. the financial markets would have collapsed. the republicans would have been crowded into a position for 20 or 30 of them would have joined the democrats. and six or eight of them would have joined the democrats in the senate. and he would have a debt ceiling with no cuts, no changes, no reforms. this is chess. this is not checkers. it is not tic-tac-toe. when you got to take to not just one step but five, six, or eight or 10 steps and that consequence, i think that kevin mccarthy got a pretty good deal and most importantly, shifted the balance of power and the balance of leadership away from both the senate and the

white house and that is frankly a historic experience comparable to what we did in 1995. >> sean: yeah. and dan, you you remember biden started out saying he would not compromise at all and then went missing in action for 9070s. let's get your take on the bill. >> well, agree with former speaker gingrich to a park. that is to say that the bill that republicans passed on the floor of the house with 218 votes was a great bill. and we were unified in doing it. and something about that. we created to -- went to is the be in for january. the problem is that when speaker mccarthy entered into this negotiation, he gave up for. speaker gingrich describes a bunch of benefits. we have spoken earlier about this. when he wrote an article on fox news about it and listed a lot of these things, when you read the text of the bill, they are not there. the cbo just today, this afternoon released information,

an estimate about the so-called work requirements that were added to food stamps. in the temporary assistance for needy families. they have said that because of the additional categories of exemptions that were added and the language of the bill, the cost of -- is going to go up by $2.1 billion. that is not a -- that is in fac, speaker -- has come out and told us that we touted benefits when you read the language of the bill, they are not there. i was just in the conference earlier this evening. and mr. mccarthy my office negotiator talked about -- mr. mccarthy's negotiator talked about the irs. but it does not do anything to stop them from hiring staff with the remaining 78.6 billion hiring new irs agents this year. >> sean: let me ask the speaker about that if you don't mind, congressman. that was a big promise of the

republicans to define the hiring or the doubling of the irs agents. why didn't they hold the line on that and i don't think it was unreasonable the republicans to say, we are going to go back to 2023 spending levels with the 1% baseline budgeting cap. to me, they were reasonable provisions. and i can understand people's anger at that. does -- is that a big issue for republicans, mr. speaker. >> as i understand it, and i went back to i thought congressman bishop was very effective on your show this afternoon. so effective that i went back to the speaker's staff and talking about some of those several of these issues. all i can reported he was for this year, they don't have that money to hire the additional agents. and this fall and the appropriations bill, republicans will -- every opportunity to continue that process. again, this is a one-year, this is a process. the question is, will we be

stronger coming out of this. and continuing to cut out the irs agent or will we be lethal? i'm told by the way, a number of democrats are so shaken by the court in domestic discretionary spending, that they are talked about taking away 20 or $30 billion of the irs money to put it to other priorities that they take are a lot more important. so i think you have got to be, you know, there are a lot of details here and i think asia seidt has a different version of what the details mean. but i would suggest to you that each of these steps, as small as they are, are in fact steps away from bigger spending. you have had the new york post, the wall street journal, and hardly left those left-wing institutions both have said this is a significant step in the right direction. they have technical experts. at least as good as congressman bishop and they have looked at it and they have concluded that on balance, this is a

significant step away from bigger government. not victory by itself. certainly, is this the end game? i would say, well, no. you say to make a this is the first step, i would say, "yes. >> sean: dan? >> sean, i can't believe my ears when folks help me, it doesn't matter if it is not in the language of the bill. what are they saying? they got a handshake agreement with joe biden. i mean, i can't believe -- but here's the real killer. it took the debt ceiling out to the january 1, 2025, a year longer than the republican bill proposed. here is a piece of information for your viewers. i just heard it tonight from the speaker in the conference. he said that we sent that happened is his call. it was not even asked for by the democrats. he didn't want to end up in another negotiation with joe biden next year because he believed that they would ask for more. that is what he said. to understand, there is a 4 trillion, maybe five or

$6 trillion increase in debt that we just let him have and the speaker says he made the call. i don't understand that. and it just does not make sense. it is -- it fractured republican unity that was so hard one. we're going to have to figure out how to put that back together. i don't know what happens with the -- >> sean: congress -- now, you talked earlier about the need maybe for motion to vacate when kevin mccarthy became speaker. that was an issue. anyone remember, basically call for the no-confidence vote in the speaker, you said earlier today that is under consideration. he believed that is going to happen? >> what i said, sean, is seems capable to be given what has occurred and the way he was the steward of republican unity and he blew into smithereens. >> sean: what report that said he would be the guy that did it? is that true? that is not how i said it. and i'm i don't go off doing

things like that for my own personal interest or out of any animus. there are people that friis use people we have worked with. very hard but you know, sean, spicher queen creek was a cricket those critical of us in january. but the result -- >> sean: i was not a credit. i just thought you guys should have done it earlier. i mean, that should have happened. >> we tried. we tried. >> sean: hit the ground running. >> point is that we actually achieved something that almost shocked the country that process and the unity that was one, so that we can put this bill on the floor and pass it when people said we were too factious to do it. they were wrong. and why would you go into a negotiation without calling folks on something that fundamental and blow up that unity? i understand speaker gingrich, josh. >> sean: let me ask you, gingrich, i'm not trying to interrupt you, congressman. i want to be fair to both sides

here. congressman, what seems to be lacking in this and i may be wrong is as the speaker was negotiating with the white house, it sounds like he was not communicating with his caucus. it seems to be that that needed to be a big part of the process, especially when you take into account that the margin of republicans majority is so sm small. [overlapping speakers] >> i can't quite common on that because i was not part of the process. i will say this. having i think pretty successfuy negotiated the -- with bill clinton for 4 years and having produce welfare reform the largest capital gains tax in history. and the only four with consecutive balanced budget in your lifetime. i actually think there's a lot of wisdom in saying to people, you would not necessarily win a second round on the debt ceiling next year. what you can't win, i say this to all conservatives, you think you can win, you are going to

have a whole series of appropriations bills this fall, congressman massey got introduced and mccarthy got adopted. a provision that if the congress does not pass all of the appropriations bills, there's an automatic for all government cut spending. so the huge incentive to get this done and my appointment would be -- >> sean: guys? >> of the conservatives have lots of opportunities in the next year and a half to make their case. but to do that, the stronger they are, the more unified they looked at the greater they agree, that with the house republicans become the center for gravity. the better off we are. and if this bill goes down, don't kid yourself. what you're going to get out of that is a clean debt ceiling with no reforms because people will crumble another weight of the financial community and the fear of the deficit.

the united states defaulting. and i think this is a huge gamble to decide that a no vote is acceptable. >> sean: congressman, i will give you 20 seconds. i'm way over time here. >> ththank you, sean. look, the problems are what are not in the bills. speaker gingrich just referred to another one. there is no auto cr in the build. there is a 1% reduction. and he is also right that we can't get in a position where we are split apart and you end up with a clean ceiling that goes on forever. you know, that is why this has to be better operated. we will fix it, but i'm not sure how right now. >> sean: all right, think about. i really appreciate it. formative debate. speaker gingrich, congressman bishop, taking. to another top story. the fbi continues to defy a subpoena from the house oversight committee and is refusing to hand over an fbi known as a 20 -- 1023 folks that

it is that alleged bribery scheme featuring joe biden and foreign nationals and specific actions taken in exchange for family money dating back to his time as vice president. house republicans are now poised to hold fbi director wray in contempt of congress. that is a width the fbi is causing unnecessary after "good faith cooperation." what does that even mean? who could not with oversight committee chairman james comer. all right. so you're going to hold director wray in contempt. is that what you said? even though you have a scheduled call with him. where does it stand tonight? >> today with the deadline. he was given three weeks to produce a document. and go into detail on what exactly they did to investigate the validity of the document. but thus far, he won't even admit that they had the document, sean. he has given us the runaround for 3 weeks. he is just stalling. he said to schedule good feet afterward. they have not produced anything. they have not even admitted they have a document. so we don't have confidence in

director wray. we are already in the process of drafting legislation to hold an oversight committee markup next week. to hold fbi director wray in contempt of congress. >> sean: let me ask you, though, most people don't know what a 1023 form is. my understanding of it is a witness that you both you and senator grassley described as credible witness. that makes very specific allegation that certain actions with taken by then vice president biden in exchange for money going to his family. okay. and that credible witness has brought that to you. and you want to see the document. now, if that is uncooperative by the fbi, that would be something probably that would be seen in private. i would guess. number two, i want to know when the fbi had this document knew about this and what they did to investigate this. >> they have had the document for 4 years. we don't know if they even investigated it. that is my fear. that he never did anything. you look at what has happened

with the irs, with the irs whistleblower claim is they were told to stand down. there is a pattern within our federal government when looking at any type of wrongdoing by the biden family, that people in the government bureaucracy have told rank and file government employees to stand down. were to give them the file and don't worry about it. that is basically what director wray is -- has told me. i have demonstrated a pattern of joe biden traveling all over the world and weeks after he leaves the country, his family starts mysteriously getting wires from that foreign country into show, please that then our wired back to the individual family -- >> sean: but let me ask you this. what would the contempt of the fbi director look like, alright? you have given him two opportunities. you have a phone call with him. they are saying they are cooperating but they are not going to give you the document. of course, you or -- your

committee and congress has not only a right but a duty in terms of oversight. what would a subpoena look like in your view? or contempt ultimately of congress look like? >> we are still drafting. but it is going to look very similar to what the democrats did with steve bannon. that was a perfect example of a congressional committee holding someone in contempt of congress. but for director wray to issue a statement. >> sean: it did not matter. if my memory serves me, it did not matter for our holder and others that were held in contempt. you know? it seems like those rules only apply to conservatives -- conservatives. >> we will do everything weekend to hold him accountable and we are not messing around. we have demonstrated a pattern of behavior that would suggest this is a credible accusation and we want answers. >> sean: all right, congressman comer, thank you for that update. we are going to watch this closely. coming up, that woke left, they have officially gone too far,

pushing their woke agenda on their children. plus, take a look at your sc screen. we have an exclusive town hall with donald j. trump in iowa. it is happening this through the outer side of the more in. he want to go to the show? , to go to hannity.com. get your tickets now before they go away. ♪ ♪ my most important kitchen tool? my brain. so i choose neuriva plus. unlike some others, neuriva plus is a multitasker supporting 6 key indicators of brain health. to help keep me sharp. neuriva: think bigger.

>> sean: we turn to a disturbing story. is one out of california where a group of teenagers allegedly beat an off-duty brain's on camera. it is a brutal -- marine on camera. it is a brutal beating. what is going on? >> reporter: three marines actually viciously beaten by a mob during of all times the memorial day holiday weekend.

a warning the video maybe disturbing to watch. this happened in southern california. that is where does three marines off-duty were kicked and punched by a group of about four teenagers -- 40 teenagers and young adults. the video showing the marines actually walking away and then a guy sucker punched one from behind. the marine charged regroup and the melee in shoes. you see a couple of marines on the ground being kicked and punched wall in a fetal position. finally, a pair of adults stepped in to stop the beating. now, in case you're wondering, yes, the marines were treated at the scene. review to be transported to a local hospital. no real surprise there. no suspect tonight, sean, have been arrested for that is sold or apprehended. however, if they are, they could face possible felony charges including assault with a deadly weapon. the mayor tonight promising those who did this will be held accountable. sean? >> sean: kevin, thank you. now the whole left vote to stop

pushing their radical agenda on our nation's kids. kohl's is the latest company to face clash after bowing to that woke mob involving the release of their pride outfits for babies. after a florida governor ron desantis signed a law prohibiting children from knowingly being exposed to adult entertainment, what is known as a furry convention a group of people interested in the concept of nonhuman animals with human characteristics who dress up as the animals in orlando, they released a statement announcing that attendees must now be over 18 years or older in what the group that was a difficult decision before asserting that it is not "abandoning their younger fans." tonight, some members of the -- they are pushing back against the left's and in saying work culture, he has been hosts anne porter called the protection of women sports, are remaining biological men playing in women's sports, one columnist accused her of bigotry.

in los angeles, we have the dodgers star clayton kershaw announcing that the team will be holding a christian faith today after they invited a group of drag queens, marking nuns to perform at a game. we will have more in a moment. not even aoc is immune to the backlash. is heated political climate. last week during a town hall, in queens, over the debt ceiling, debate, aoc was paraded by her constituents as the event descended into total chaos. take a look. [overlapping speakers] >> the races [bleep]. [applause] >> you claim -- >> i will -- [overlapping speakers] >> create a lot of harm. >> we sent f-16s --

[overlapping speakers] >> on the verge of nuclear war. stop this war! >> sean: here with action, tommy lahren and charlie. tommy lahren, i never thought -- i did not know what a furry convention was until a short time ago. we got drag queen story hour for young kids in school, gender identity for young kids in class. i never thought i would see congress asking potential cabinet officials whether or not they can define a woman. but that is the world we are living in. maybe you could explain to me what happened because it happened like that to me. >> yeah, it is unfortunate that we have to discuss this. it is fortunate that there are certain groups and individuals and leaders that are standing up to stop this. now, again, when people tell you who they are, you need to believe them. when people are upset that they can perform trendy dances in

front of children, they are a pervert. if you know any thing about these furry convention, they have weird kink sexual performances. when these people tell you who they are, believe them. they continue to stand for this. they continue to defend it and conservatives have to stand up and they have to push back and finally, we are doing that. >> sean: i think that has not have been a lot in schools. i want. i want to get a.u. pro take. charlie on this goes on all of these issues i guess former colleague, you have been at espn. dealing with the same issue you dealt with. >> exactly. i was at espn for 4 or five years before coming back and i'm dealing with the same type of backlash that goes along with those who was one of the other two current espn employees who is getting the voice to stand up for women. i have been called a big day after day after starting to talk

about these type of things. i understand and i find it completely agree just because we have been working for centuries or centuries, that is a little too long protected, rather, to get women to a place where they have the same rights in sporting world as man. so it is crazy to me that by setting up for women's rights and now you are considered a bigot and it is not just nancy armour if those of usa today. it is also lia thomas who is calling people a bigot for standing up for women's rights and it is also brittney griner who we remember called it a crime to separate anyone for any reason in the world of sports. i don't know what direction we hope to end up in. at this point. i feel like we should just say that steroids are acceptable. i feel like maybe all sports should be, well. i don't understand what direction liberals want this to go in or end up in. >> sean: maybe the answer is okay, you're going to have women sports, transports and trans sports. wouldn't that be the first way to do it? even caitlyn jenner it said, i

want to know whether the testosterone levels were for these biological men at puberty not when they were in their 20s. and one of the physical differences and what advantage it gives. you know, i just, i'm having a hard time understanding this one issue, tomi. why do people feel they can circumvent the values that parents want to instill in kids? if you are an adult he want to go to a, -- a furry convention, have at it. if you want to -- whatever group you want to identify with, really, i'm going to be honest. i don't think most americans really care. but why the need to indoctrinate kids and the push for that? >> whoa, listen, they have to have future foot soldiers and that is exactly what the left is prepping and planning for. they want to, circumvent the family. and they finally found a way to do that and that is by bringing in all of this lgbtq rainbow mafia stuff under the guise of

inclusion and diversity and tolerance. it is exploding and targeting and grooming children. and they have found a way to kind of put that under their movement and so that anybody that disagrees with them gets called a bigot or a homophobe or a transphobe. you name the name. that is in hillary's basket of tutorials. however, they have underestimated the hints -- conservative movement. if they were waiting for us to find the help we are going to die on, they have found it. the hill is the one that is protecting children. so finally the reason there's so much discussion about this is because conservatives are finally fighting back. and that aggravates them because we don't care if we are called a name anymore. that is the ultimate armor that i hope that we push forward with that mentality. >> sean: charly, i will give you the last word. maybe they can go back to the basics and educating our kids. which they are very deficient in. >> you, i think there's a lot of people that are throwing around words that they deem hateful and they have lost all of their meaning like tomi just said.

i don't care if you call me a bigot or a transphobe, i will stand up for what i know is right. a lot of parents are furious that they are getting their kids involved. this is an area where know you were -- no one should have a right over what your kid learns or -- or says except for the parents and i think that it would be interesting. bringing the thing into perspective is that tiktok was the one place that we saw a lot of heat and pollution being spewed including the minds of our kids and now it is the moms who are getting on tiktok using this as an activist tool and it is working. they are spreading their fury. the boycotts are working, and i hope they continue it. >> sean: all right, charly, tomi, thank you. hunter biden scandal. is it getting worse by the day? we have reaction. town hall with former president trump in iowa this thursday. tickets our free. go to hannity.com. we have more hannity right after this. ♪ ♪ with maximum otc strength lidocaine that contours to the body

to relieve pain right where it hurts. and did we mention, it really, really sticks? salonpas, it's good medicine. ♪ dads are special. fun. inspiring. always there for you. so make father's day extra special with gifts he'll love from weathertech. floorliners... cargo liner... seat protector... sunshade... ready-to-wash system and cupfone.

or our newest product, the golf cart mat. order these american made gifts or a gift card at weathertech.com have a very happy father's day. (janet) so much space!... that open kitchen! (tanya) oooh definitely the one! (ethan) but how can you sell your house when we're stuck on a space station for months???!!! (brian) no guys, opendoor gives you the flexibility to sell and buy on your timeline. (janet) nice! (intercom) flightdeck, see you at the house warming. hi, i'm norma, and i lost 53 pounds on golo. when i started golo, i expected to plateau like i had so many other times. i was surprised that sticking to the golo plan and taking release, the weight just kept coming off. (soft music)

♪ ♪ >> sean: so the never ending stream of their experience hundred scandals. the report says kevin mars has the famed hollywood attorney described as the sugar brother has been finished supporting him to his and his troubles. jonathan turley highlighted this in his column. message revealed that at the height of the thuney into a shady business dealings, the biden's offer hundred "safe harbor from his growing problems." here with direction, author of the daniel burgess out today, it is a great. i'm reading an. trial of the century. hannity.com, amazon.com, bookstores across the country. immediately following this show, live book signing. you can get a first print sign edition.

i will be his guest tonight. just go to gregg jarrett. .com. congrats on the book. what do we know about this sugar brother as he is being described. he paid all this morning. that he pay taxes? has anybody scrutinized it in terms of legality? that seems like an odd relationship to me. >> no kidding. hunter biden claims he lives in a mansion in malibu. he is flying around on his sugar daddy $6 million jet. all the while he is selling his kindergarten finger paintings for 6 figures. probably to the same chinese benefactors that followed 31 million biden family. as for the loyer, look, it has been described as $2 million

loan to pay off the irs debt? that would appear to be a violation of the code of conduct that governs lawyers. you are not allowed to loan money except for minimal living expenses and it does advancing the cost of litigation not just $2 million worth. he also appears to be entangled in hunter biden's business is at least one of them and again, that is forbidden by the canons of ethics. it strikes me the bar association to be investigating. >> sean: you know, john, i look at this. none of them were held accountable. they were not even interviewed in terms of the durham report which shocks me especially in light of what we now know. and what that report says. so, you know, everybody is watching. day in and day out. we report all this news. the fbi has had the laptop since december of 2019. we know there's a low hanging fruit of crimes committed on the laptop. nothing happens.

why should anyone have faith in our justice system and, you know, nothing happens unless you are republican. >> i mean, i can report that very few people to have faith in the justice system anymore. certainly the republicans in congress that have any faith in christopher wray and if republicans take back the white house in 2034 i suspect he will be fired. the fbi litany of failures on hunter biden have been going on since at least 2019 when they -- as you mentioned, they had the laptop and did not move on it. and then they have been allegedly investigating hunter biden since 2018. the department of justice and we have not seen any progress in that case and just for some comparison, there has been almost six-year investigation. we have seen people who were involved in january 6 trial arrested tried convicted served their sentence and released all in the span of time that hunter biden has been being investigated by the department of justice with no consequences for his behavior. so to reiterate, there's not a lot of confidence now. and they did not move on it. >> sean: greg, the last word.

>> we learned about the text message from the person and his brother. this can work all the deals are still alive. i can work with your father alone. in other words, the machine had to keep going. funneling money from overseas into biden-controlled bank accounts and it was not just hunter biden. who was involved. the president's brother and documents show that the president himself may have been complicit. >> sean: well, at the end of this, if this continues, might as well take that great document known as our constitution and shred it because it is meaningless. by the way, gregg, congrats on the book, "trial of the century." i will be with you. greggjarrettbook.com, you have been doing a live signing. and best of luck. bookstores all around the country. >> thank you. >> sean: coming up next, jane fonda is actually blaming, try to guess who she is blamed for

the climate crisis. this may be the nuttiest, craziest reasoning to date. and the ladies of "the view" they can't comprehend women being conservative. we will have reaction straight ahead. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ >> sean: according to some wealthy liberal celebrities, white people, they are to blame for just about everything. for example, here is what jane fonda has to say about white men and climate change. take a look. >> there would be no climate crisis if there was no racism. there would be no climate crisis if there was no patriarchy. it is a mindset that sees things in a horror, go way. white men are the things that really matter and that

everything else is at the bo bottom. right? it is a tragedy that we have to absolutely stop. we have to arrest and jail those men, they are all men, running the oil companies and the gas companies and plastic refineries. we have to make them stop. this is really serious. >> sean: we have to arrest and jail all those white men and they are all man. all of them. white women are not being spared either. here is what the hard-hitting abc news show "the view" had to say about them. >> i think that white women in particular one to protect the patriarchy here because it is to their benefit. they want to make sure that their husbands do well. they want to make sure that their sons do well. and they want to make sure that they do well. most of the women in these studies are a married white women. and they do fall in line with what their husbands are doing, what does. >> you attribute to -- cameron

hergott with reaction to the host of the podcast, dixon and ari fleischer. i do know who is laughing ha harder. we have only seven or eight between seven and eight years to cover use of fossil fuels and have. no other country is going to go to that measure ever. so we are economically energy wise unilaterally disarming. but your reaction to that and putting all these men and only man in jail. >> you, i love how being an actress for a living and being able to match legwarmers makes her an expert in climate change and now she is going to go arrest people. i don't know how her test level even run if she can't power it which is most likely power from gas. so how is she actually going to get anywhere if she decides to do this? and then will she also jail her friends like john kerry and all of her friends that are flying private jets? i mean, it is absolutely ridiculous.

and on the view, i remember a time when barbara waters was on there and she would have looked at them and said, we need to have the viewpoint from all women. the last time i checked, women on the republican side were never being forced. in fact, i will go as far as to say my husband did not drag me out of the house by the hair and take a run for office, a woman, and do it for the patriarchy. this is ridiculous. >> sean: onto the flagstones was over. we have to arrest these men and they are all white men ari. you're going to jail and so am i. >> [laughs] send us away, you know, i love this. i love the fact that these people can still speak like this because it is a reminder of how bad extreme liberals can be. and i have to points out that even at the cannes film festival where jane fonda spoke, she got a prospect most people there recognize you to see when -- identity politics is killing america. the notion that we should judge one another on the basis of

whether they are male or female or white or black or hispanic or anything else, this is the disease inside the democratic party. they are taking the beautiful phrase and abolishing the unity that has made us a great country and they only want to focus on the many and they use it to -- in a derogatory way against white men. this is killing the democrats. it is why they have lost all the rural vote. they are increasingly vulnerable in the suburbs and i hope they keep doing it. >> sean: but they are doing that but we have got this mass migration, tudor dixon, you are seeing that, people leaving michigan. they have done have it. they are done. that takes a. state like michigan or wisconsin or pennsylvania or, you know, nevada or arizona and makes it that much harder for a republican to get the electoral votes. >> yeah, it makes it a. state, a blue state.

and it also destroys the estate. i mean, we had gretchen whitmer just last week talking about what she was planning to do. i think actually it was earlier this week to try to increase population because we are the leading population. we have know people next here. so it is devastating. but i think it is good that they continued to go out and say this because they are being very honest now. they are being very open with these ridiculous comments about putting people in jail. and it is going to help republicans. >> sean: last word, ari. >> yeah, i just find it sad, sean. i was not raised to divide people like this. i was there but does raise to judge people from their intelligence, wisdom, and baird's. to hear this talk running among the far left of the democratic party is just not america and i don't like to hear it. >> sean: it is bad for the country. this is nuts. thank you both. more "hannity" straight ahead. ♪ ♪

hello, i'm franklin graham. you know the most valuable thing that you own? it's your soul. you have a soul. you have a spirit. and the bible tells us that we'll live as long as god lives. one day your body will die and they'll bury you. but your soul will continue to live in the presence of god in heaven. or be separated from god for eternity in hell. the choice you make today can determine where your soul will spend eternity. you know that god loves you. and he sent his son jesus christ to save us. and if we're willing to put our faith and trust in him, because he took our sins to the cross, he died in our place for our sins, and god raised him to life. if you've never invited christ into your heart, into your life, you can do that right now by just praying this prayer, just saying, “god, i'm a sinner. i'm sorry. forgive me. i want to turn from my sins.

i want to trust your son as my savior and follow him as lord from this day forward, forever”" if you prayed that prayer, call that number. god bless you.

>> sean: before we go a quick programming note. tomorrow we have a live audience so in new york. now thursday night we have our exclusive town hall with former president donald j. trump in iowa tickets for both shows absolutely free. where do you get them? hannity.com, they go fast, looking forward to seeing many of you in iowa thursday. in the meantime let not your heart be troubled kayleigh mack machiney in for laura, have a great show and good to see you as always. >> good to see you sean thank you >> i'm kayleigh mcenany and this is a special edition of the ingraham angle from new york city tonight. just moments ago, the biden mccarthy debt ceiling bill passed the house rules committee which means tomorrow it will go to the floor for a debate then a full house vote and it's anyone's guess what happens there. but if you think any of this is without drama you are sorely mistaken. at thi