lastly, sean hant is interviewing gavin newsom at 9:00. kilmeade is up next. johnny looked like clay travis at the stakes there. he puts on a blazer with a pattern, and starts acting naughty. clay, keep your blazers off my johnny. all right remembers, my watters. and this is my world. >> brian: all right. hi. welcome to "fox news tonight." i'm brian kilmeade. in the entirety of our country's 247-year history, not a single president has ever been arrested by the federal government for a crime. that will change tomorrow at 3:00 when former trump turns himself in. arresting and charging a former president is truly unprecedented. trump isn't just a former

president. he happens to be the leading candidate to get the gop nomination and be atop the primaries when it's all said and done, making him joe biden's primary and main opponent. is that the man that's going to be charging the president, the former president of the united states, is that the justice department that he controls? yes, the justice department specifically accusing trump of violating the espionage act. congress passed the espionage act a few years before world war i. the law was meant to target spies who might turn against the united states during wartime. joe biden's justice department is trying to argue that trump is a spy, which is really absurd. now, the president said as much in a rally over the weekend. he addressed the indictment against him in public for the first time. >> the baseless indictment of me by the biden administration's weaponized department of injustice will go down as among the most horrific abuses of power in the history of our country. i think it already is. i said that hunter will probably

be charged with some minor offense, like jaywalking so that the fbi and the doj can pretend they're fair. oh, we got hunter. while they're going after me under the espionage act, that's like the creation of missiles in your basement. they got him for nothing. there's never been a more corrupt group of people in the history of our country running this country. >> brian: he's still fighting. the biden administration is attacking their likely rival in 2024. voters decide at the ballot box. what about that? trump pointed out this is an explicit attempt to interfere in his view in the upcoming election. >> they've launched witch-hunt after witch-hunt, and they just tried to stop our movement. they want to do anything they

can to thwart the will of the american people. it's called election interference. that's what they're doing now. this is election interference. we've never seen it on a scale like this. >> brian: witch-hunt after witch-hunt. trump says that, even though the justice department feels it has enough evidence against trump. well, it will actually turn a jury against him, and will decide his fate, if he goes to jail for the rest of his life. these 12 individuals have to unanimously find trump guilty on 37 counts. but for trump, it's going to be tough. he has to run the table and convince the jury he's not guilty on each of those 37 counts. otherwise he could be spending the rest of his life in prison. no joke. in the meantime the democratic party's allies in the media are already trying to make a case against trump, and anyone who agrees with him in the court of public opinion. >> at this point, though, with somebody like donald trump winning the nomination for the gop at the primary, be a clear

endorsement of political violence? >> umm, i want to tell you, kate, that might be one of the questions i've been asked. i think it is an endorsement of political violence. i think we have to look at 2 20. >> brian: what kind of question was that? what kind of answer is that? it's the same old playbook. anyone who sides with trump is trying to destroy democracy. the media and the democrats are trying to save it. these people don't care about democracy in my view, or mishandling classified documents. many are guilty of what they're accusing trump of. perhaps no one exemplifies that more than former fbi director andy mckay, fired from the fbi for leaking classified documents, which is a direct violation of -- drum roll, please -- the espionage act. house speaker kevin mccarthy reported that out today directly to a cnn reporter. watch. >> if the former president is

accused of misleading law enforcement, are you prepared to defend him as a former president, and what other actions will the house take in terms of funding? >> are you prepared to defend your network, cnn -- >> that is -- >> i'm answering your question. you can ask me any question you want, but i'm entitled to answer your question. okay? you can't put words in my mouth, even though your network hired andy mccabe fired from the fbi for leaking classified documents. did you remove him from network? no. you continued to put him on in judgment of president trump. >> brian: not waiting for the question, giving the answer she doesn't want. journalist should hold democrats responsible for this hypocrisy, don't you think? should be asking how and why the president of the united states should be allowed to prosecute his chief political rival, instead journalists that carry for the water for the administration in many cases,

presidential candidate vivek ramaswamy, made the point yesterday on cnn. >> there's no evidence that president biden has had anything to do with this prosecution. >> with due respect, it's shameful as a competitor to president trump in this race have to ask questions that the media isn't asking. the job of the political media, if it has one job, is to hold the u.s. government accountable. >> yes, we know that. >> instead, you're seeing the media doing the bidding of the u.s. government. get to the bottom of what biden told garland, and garland told jack smith. >> brian: he's taking action. he's filing a freedom of information request to expose the biden communication, if there is any, between all these factions that he just described. vivek, what exactly are you

doing? >> my campaign filed a freedom of information act request. i consider it a demand of both the biden white house as well as the biden department of justice to figure out what direct or indirect communications there were between biden, garland, and jack smith. and the reason why is i read that indictment, brian. it wreaks of political -- platization all the way down. there are selective omissions of the presidential records act, the most relevant statue to the actual alleged crimes. executive orders not binding a u.s. president. that's how the classifications are defined. this wreaks -- i said the media isn't going to do it. if other political candidates aren't going to do it, then i'm going to lead the way starting now. make no mistake, it would be easier if donald trump were eliminated from competition in this race. that's not the way i want to win.

i want to win this election by convincing the voters that i'm the best person to govern. that's the way we do things in america. not by having the federal administrative police state eliminate the competition. brian, i stand on the side of principle. >> brian: there's a new development we want to share with you. it happened on the senate floor today. senator chuck grassley sharing shocking information about joe biden, about hunter biden, and their business dealings with burisma. listen. >> the 1023 produced to the house committee's redacted reference that the foreign national who allegedly bribed joe and hunter biden allegedly has audio recordings of his audio conversation with them. 17 such recordings. according to the 1023, the foreign national possesses 15 audio recordings of phone calls

between him and hunter biden. according to the 1023, the foreign national possesses two audio recordings of phone calls between him and then vice president joe biden. these recordings were allegedly kept as a sort of insurance policy for the foreign national in case that he got into a tight spot. >> brian: pretty stunning, right? grassley said the information was redacted from the version of the document presented to the house republicans, and democrats too, on the committee, presented to them last week. why was it so heavily redacted? was that the part that was redacted about the 17 recordings? vivek, your take. >> first of all, why are we only hearing about this now? you have a corrupt federal police state that's gone for years after some made-up russia collusion narrative when in fact apparently it seems there's evidence staring in the face of a different kind of foreign interference and corruption. i also want to make an obvious

observation, brian. they said they wanted to keep it as an insurance policy, those recordings. let's observe where we are right now. the u.s. president happens to be that same vice president, joe biden, sending literally hundreds of billions of dollars of u.s. taxpayer aid to ukraine, the very country where you have an enterprise whose owner is on national security councils and boards in ukraine. so i think that -- i'm shocked that no one was drawn that obvious analogy as well, that that insurance policy that he's talking about with those audiotapes may be playing out at the expense of the american taxpayer. this is why we should not want a corrupt government. transparency is the only way forward. the we're going to need a new honest government. that's a big part of why i'm in this race, what i'm hoping to lead, is a revolution of transparency in the administrative state itself. >> brian: it would be a nice change. also, how many times is joe biden going to lie before we start to actually label him that

way? i know nothing about my son's overseas business dealings. clearly that's wrong. we find out everything he says he didn't know from his background in syracuse, in college, all the things to the 51 intel agencies who said this is classic russian disinformation when he knew damn well that was his family's laptop with all their secrets on it. he had no problem staring into this camera and saying that very same thing. how do we still label him as honest? >> well, brian, i will stare into this camera and say that this is grounds for impeachment if this is true. if these facts are substantiated, the facts of lying about it, especially if it's on grounds of then taking steps as u.s. president to make good on that old promise that was previously unsealed. i think that's grounds for impeachment. i think we need to deliver accountability to leaders who betray their oaths of office. i think we need to see that

applied even handily in our country. >> brian: you'll be in miami, right? >> at 10:30 a.m. with the press conference and additional announcements on the information we're demanding. >> brian: no one is going to woutwork vivek ramaswamy. thank you. trump has vowed to stay in the race even if convicted. how do the charges change his strategy? steven miller is as close to the president as anyone i know, a former advisor through all four years. your reaction to the indictment and the official, i guess, arraignment tomorrow. what changes? >> well, this is obviously a tragedy of unmatched proportions in american history where you have the president of the united states trying to incarcerate for life his chief political rival, and now hauling him in front of a federal court for that purpose. there are not words -- i strain to find the vocabulary, brian,

true ra describe what an unmitigated catastrophe this is. we're witnessing a fundamental change in american society. the era of democratic republicanism has passed away. now we have an unelected bureaucracy, an unelected all powerful person deciding for himself who will be shielded, hillary clinton will be shielded, joe biden will be shielded, who will be jailed, punished, and targeted, and donald trump to them is pub neem number one. >> brian: do you agree giving back the documents would have saved this massive headache in this indictment when asked? >> i reject the entire premise. let me get technical with this for a moment if i can with you, brian. 1917 espionage act was created decades before the classification system, and decades before the presidential records act. under federal law, based on both classification law and based on the presidential records act, the president of the united

states has absolute authority to decide what records he believes should be classified or not or should be taken for his purposes for a future library, what have you, or not. that is his authority to use the correct legal term. under the interception, if a president declassifies a record, takes that record with him, that he could be punished, he can be jailed, because a bureaucrat in the future decides that that record is not something that he should be possess in the defense interest. it creates a system where the president is subordinate to the bureaucracy. that is constitutionally untenable under article ii. doj had no right whatsoever to criminalize this action, or to ever issue a subpoena. this was an entirely an administrative process, and a political process, that was

improperly criminalized from the beginning. >> brian: jack smith has had trouble with governor bob mcdonald, had that conviction overturned. he had trouble with senator menendez. they had a hung jury. he got free. trouble with john downwards, trying to prosecute that case. he ended up being exonerated. what's your action to jack smith, the bulldog, going after your former boss. >> you just mentioned prior precedents. it dovetails with the point i was just making. the mcdonald case, highly politicized prosecution, nog on the scale -- nothing like we're seeing now, but they found a sympathetic jury, able to get a conviction. the supreme court -- this is so rare, brian -- unanimously overturned it because the decision to prosecute was deemed to be unconstitutional. in other words, the theory behind the whole case was deemed to be unconstitutional. so you have a case here, where you have a special counsel $2., with a history of violating the

constitution, but nothing more spectacular than what we're seeing now. >> brian: we'll find out with new revelations about possible 17 tapes of joe and hunter biden in this burisma contact. we're following up on that. stephen miller, thanks so much. >> thank you. >> brian: joe soros handed the cathekeys over to his son. and california has introduced a bill that could jail parents who don't affirm their child's gender decisions. more on that after the break. we're not talking about practice? we're talking about cashbackin. we're talking about cashbackin. we're talking about cashbackin. not a game! we've been talking about practice for too long. -word. -no practice. we're talking about cashbackin.

we're talking about cashbackin. i mean, we're not talking about a game! cashback like a pro with chase freedom unlimited. how do you cashback? chase. make more of what's yours.

hi, i'm susan, i've lost 84 pounds on golo and i've kept it off for a year. i had spent so much money on other products that when i saw the commercial for golo, the price was so much cheaper and i thought, "boy, this might not work but why not try it?" it is amazing and it works really well. oh, hey. buying a car from vroom is so easy, all you need is a phone and a finger. just go to vroom.com, scroll through thousands of cars. then, tap to buy. that's it. no sales speak. no wasted time. just, straight up great cars. right from your phone to your driveway. go to vroom.com and pick your favorite.

wooo. oh yeah, she digs it. buy your car on vroom.com vroom. get in. my name is joshua florence, and one thing i learned being a firefighter is plan ahead. you don't know what you're getting into, but at the end of the day, you know you have a team behind you that can help you. not having to worry about the future makes it possible to make the present as best as it can be for everybody.

>> welcome back. glad you're here. george soros' legacy will live after him. the hungarian billionaire ensured that by announcing this weekend that his 37-year-old son alexander will take over his massive empire. the open society foundation is one of the largest nonprofits in the world. the 37-year-old takes over and he'll manage $25 billion of a war chest, and fund progressive causes, of course. he already vows that he will be, quote, more political than his

father. miranda divine is a columnist with the "new york post," author of "laptop from hell." this is bad news, don't you think? >> it's really bad news. i mean, soros himself, george soros, made the money. he's a chaos merchant for some reason. he's been a malign influence in politics around the world. he seems to just want to sew sow chaos with his political interventions. his son is a spoiled little rich kid. he's the fourth of soros' five children to two different wives. he appears to be the only one who has any kind after a relationship with his father. and he's more left wing than his father. he's more focused on domestic issues. he's been to visit the biden white house at least a dozen

times. he's in charge of his father's super pac for political interventions. so i think that we will have to brace ourselves for his involvement in the 2024 election on behalf of democrats. >> so he has how much, do you think, to spend? well, i think he's got about -- well, he's got $25 billion really, but i think he's got about $15 million slushing around in the piggy bank to bankroll various, you know, pet projects of the democrats. if you remember how much chaos mark zuckerberg managed to sow back in 2020 to buy ballot boxes, drop boxes, you'll see nefarious purposes that alex soros' money will be used for. he's a pliable young man. he's been shaped by the radical activists on george soros' open

societies foundation to be the leader and to step up. you know, he was quite an overweight insecure introverted child, but being kind of the last man standing of the children he's -- >> brian: gets the nod. the i look at what elon musk wrote. he said george soros -- once said that soros wants to erode the very frac of society. that's what he's doing with all these liberal das. you see the crime running rampant in major cities. that's george soros. now his son. >> well, look, i asked someone who knew soros quite well why he was doing this. the he himself is surrounded by bodyguards that make sure he doesn't suffer the consequences of what he's done in new york in particular. and it's because, i'm told, he has a feeling that the only way that society can be rebuilt as a utebowian vision is by, first of

all, breaking it down. the. >> brian: yeah. miranda devine, thank you so much. i was hoping that vision would go away with him. looks like it's not. meanwhile, democrats in california are trying to use state power to control how parents raise their children. fox's matt finnn has the story. matt? >> the california assembly approved an amended state family law bill that goes before the senate tomorrow. that amended bill now that reads in custody disputes courts would be required to take into consideration whether a parent affirms their child's gender identity. critics of the amended bill claim it might open the door to the possibility that a parent could lose custody if the court doesn't think they support their child's gender identity. democratic assemblywoman lori wilson cowrote the bill, trying to downplay any controversy by insisting gender affirmation is not the most important factor when determining custody.

>> if you have a 7-year-old who's talking about having a potential to say -- being able to articulate that they believe they are not the same gender as they are biologically, then it should be affirmed, and through care it should be determined. that's what we did with our own child. >> this bill was co-sponsored by state senator scott wiener, who also advanced a separate bill, requires foster par parents to affirm a child's sexual identity. >> brian: what an embarrassment. matt, thank you very much. radical gender insanity is spreading across the country. a judge in washington just ordered a female-only nude spa to accept male customers. more on that next. but i wonder if you just take a few seconds to pray with me real quick.

in the name of the father and son, holy spirit. amen. lord jesus, come to us now. help us to surrender ourselves completely to you. help us to listen to your voice. even when we're distracted or tired, we pray this in the name of the father and of the son of the holy spirit. amen. thank you so much. i just want to encourage you that if you want to join me in more prayer, check out hallow it's the number one prayer app in the world. (vo) if you've had thyroid eye disease for years and your bloodshot eyes have you seeing red, it's not too late for another treatment option. to learn more visit treatted.com that's treatt-e-d.com.

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

get 2.9% apr for 36 months plus $1,500 purchase allowance on a 2023 xt5 and xt6 when you finance through cadillac financial. i'm barbara and i'm from st. joseph, michigan. i'm a retired school librarian. i'm also a library board trustee, a mother of two, and a grandmother of two. basically, i thought that my memory wasn't as good as it had been. i needed all the help i could get. i saw the commercials for prevagen. i started taking it. and it helped! i noticed my memory was better. there was definite improvement. i've been taking prevagen for a little over five years. prevagen. at stores everywhere without a prescription.

>> brian: a judge in washington state just issued a troubling ruling in a victory for radical gender activists. jason rants brings us this bad news, he's a seattle radio host, fantastic at it, the author of "what's killing america." he has the story. jason, spell it out. >> okay. so we've got a seattle judge and washington officials are declaring that women's rights no longer exist. olympus spa is a traditional korean spa, women only. it requires nudity, but they make exceptions for trans women going through gender reassignment surgeries. a transactivist by the name of haven filed a complaint, saying this is discriminatory. this was an investigation, and the commission sided with her.

so in other words, they're redefining biology. olympus spa sues, but a seattle district court judge sided with the state. so now the spa is in a position where they'll have to allow in biological men, which upsets staff members, and upsets customers, many of whom i've spoken to today. this is not the only transgender controversy around a spa. you'll probably recall, back in 2021, there was a woman who confronted a staff member at the wee spa in los angeles because the woman found a biological man in what was supposed to be a women's only space. it turned out to be a convicted sex offender, charged for indecent exposure in that case along with a few others, yet antifa thugs at the time, other activists that rallied around the spa, and the sex offender here in washington state. there's actually a rally planned for saturday that will be there to defend olympus spa against

this ruling. i spoke with their lawyer today. they're refiling, and if they have to, moving forward with an appeal. >> brian: they'll destroy two businesses in one, because of this idiotic ruling. thank you so much, jason. appreciate it. i wish it wasn't true, but every word was. meanwhile california governor gavin newsom downplayed rumors that he's contemplating a presidential run, putting himself in the national conversation in recent months, toured through red states. newsom still insists he's not running against president biden. listen. >> do you think he's cognitively strong enough to be president? >> i do. i've talked to him when he's been overseas, in air force one, marine one, in the limo with him. i've spent time with him. >> you never answered my question directly. how many times does your phone ping a day, saying you need to be in this race, that they agree

with me he's not up to the job? >> i see where you're going with that. >> i'm asking. >> i'm not answering. >> brian: right. by not answering, he's answering. newsom doesn't have much of a record to run o. people have been keeping score, california led the nation for the number of people who fled the state. over 300,000 californians fled to other states in a single year. the state also has the highest rate of homelessness. and has nearly a third of the entire country's homeless population, along with rolling blackouts and a demand for electric cars. charlie hurt is an opinion editor at "the washington times." charlie, what's going on here? >> well, yeah, he's running against joe biden for president? umm, no, it's amazing. the shamelessness is probably one of the greatest gifts in politics. the more shameless you are, the more dishonest you are, the farther you get in politics. this guy is measuring the drapes

in the white house as soon as the president leaves the white house. then he turned around. i love that answer. first of all, his explanation for why he says that joe biden is cognitively together is that, oh, i've been in a limo with him, i've been here with him, been at the white house. he calls me when he's overseas. he inserts himself into the whole situation as an explanation for -- it's like, you know, when you tell a job -- in your job interview, you tell them that my biggest weakness is my modesty. the guy is always operating, always scamming, always maneuvering, but he's running for president. watch your back, joe. >> brian: you know, he's the antithesis of governor desantis. governor desantis doesn't worry about the charm to his detriment all he does is produce results, no matter what gender you are, what race you are, ethnicity you

are, he produces results. that's why he's running. gavin newsom looks like he was cast in the part, he's just terrible at the job, and wants a promotion. >> yeah. he's telling central casting. not only does california lead the country in people fleeing the policies of gavin newsom and other democrats, they also lead the nation in the number of people fleeing to move to me mexico. >> brian: right. >> maybe we should make him border czar, because he's the only person, the only democrat in the entire country, who's managed out how to figure out how to reverse the flow of illegal immigration. >> brian: he tells sean hannity, that he owns homelessness, it's really bad, he feels terrible about it, and he has to fix it, but he attracts them, they set up tent cities, co cordone certn

areas. these people have checked out. this isn't because they can't make their rent. final thought. >> no. drug abuse is a huge part of it. i want to give them credit that he's acknowledging that it's a problem, but he doesn't deserve credit. it's so bad that even gavin newsom realizes. also in his answer, he also blames the last republican administration, which was 20 years ago in california. >> brian: right, exactly. everything was so bad then, he's trying to fix it. charlie hurt, thank you so much. >> good to see you. >> brian: meanwhile, senator grassley revealed shocking new information about joe and hunter biden's business dealings with burisma. an executive at that company allegedly has audio recordings of the bidens. do republicans plan on investigate that? senator tom cotton with that and so much more.

don't move. salonpas lidocaine flex. a super thin, flexible patch with maximum otc strength lidocaine that contours to the body to relieve pain right where it hurts. and did we mention, it really, really sticks? salonpas, it's good medicine.

if you have heart disease and are on a statin, lowering cholesterol can be hard. and diets and exercise add to the struggle. it can feel never-ending. but today, it's possible to go from struggle to cholesterol success with leqvio. taken with a statin, leqvio is proven to lower bad cholesterol by over 50%. so, if you feel like you're getting nowhere... ...go with 2 doses a year of leqvio and keep bad cholesterol low. common side effects were injection site reaction, joint pain, urinary tract infection, diarrhea, chest cold, pain in legs or arms, and shortness of breath. when you're ready to go from struggle to cholesterol success, talk to your doctor about twice-yearly leqvio to help you lower your cholesterol.

lower. longer. leqvio. ♪

>> brian: let's go back to our top story, a new development in the biden family business scandal earlier today. according to a very reputable man named senator chuck grassley, there's audio recordings of his conversations with joe and hunter biden. the executive reportedly kept his recordings as a, quote, unquote, insurance policy, all of this was in the fbi's 1023 document that republicans fought tooth and nail to access, who were told originally by the fbi it didn't exist, but this information was conveniently redacted. what do senate republicans plan to do about this? this only happened a couple hours ago. senator tom cotton is a senator from arkansas. senator, when chuck grassley reads something like this t it's impactful. what changes if these recordings exist? >> god bless chuck grassley.

he's been a titan of oversight for decades in the senate. again today he revealed shocking new information that when the fbi allowed house members last week to review a report from a confidential source, they redacted, not just the names or the identities of people, they redacted the fact that the source apparently has 17 different recordings with hunter biden and joe biden. it's not possible that the existence of those recordings could be somehow classified or sensitive or compromised investigations. the only explanation for such a redacttion is that the fbi, the department of justice, didn't want republicans conducting oversight to know they existed, because the obvious next step is, okay, where are those recordings? let's hear them, if they do exist, if they involve joe biden or hunter biden. that's where we should go next from here. the fbi has a lot of explaining to do. >> could you clue me in on how

this happens? the chairman and the ranking member get a chance to read this document. then they say we still holding you in contempt. the he says, i'll release it to the entire committee. they notice the redacttions, and covering the redacttion was news about the recordings that talk about money. how does this happen that the redaction gets overturned and this -- these facts get exposed? what do you think took place? >> well, i suspect that a whistleblower that maybe first brought this to the attention of chuck grassley or james comer or

jim jordan, brought to their attention that no one was speaking about these audio recordings, because that's explosive news, if there's audio recordings of any member of the biden family talking about the blatant corruption. maybe the tapes don't exist. maybe they do. certainly the claim they exist should have been disclosed to committee members of the house oversight committee, reviewing this memorandum. chuck grassley has been developing human sources in the government for a long time, as has james comer. they need to explain to congress why this redaction occurred. >> brian: the tape is there that says i know nothing about my son's overseas business dealings. not only do these forms say he knows, he got his son the job on the burisma board. senator tom cotton, thank you so much for going with the breaking news. >> thank you, brian. >> brian: another high-profile democrat is caught in a stock-trading scandal, i'm

talking about energy secretary jennifer granholm. she said she did not own individual stocks. watch. >> ethics officials in recent years have warned one-third of the energy department's senior officials own stock related to the agency's work, more than 130 officials in the energy department collectively reported about 2,700 trades of shares, options, bonds in companies that ethics officers said were related to the agency's work. do you own individual stocks, madam secretary? >> no. i'm invested in mutual funds. >> good. >> brian: only if it was true. it wasn't. she did own individual stocks, claiming she sold them in may. tudor dixon is the host of the tudor dixon show, a great podcast. tudor, your reaction to this

revelation? >> she knew exactly what she was invested in. when she was governor of michigan said we would be blown away by the green initiatives she would bring to the state. this has been her baby for years. there's no question in my mind that she knew she was lying in that moment. mutual funds? she knew she was invested in these companies because she's been doing things to make sure they succeed. this is exactly what we don't want. we don't want people in power to be able to influence whether or not companies do well. she should be in big trouble. will she be? not as a democrat. >> brian: it really matters, talking about energy, the most vital part of our economy, dealing with inflation, a willingness to give up oil and gas against our will. this is what the administration wants. but who feels differently about her now, if there are financial incentives to her decisions. >> well, she won't be held accountable, but she lied about this. she's done some interesting --

she's made interesting choices lately. she also had investments in ford, even though she said she was out of ford. >> brian: right. >> she came out and said i'm going to remove grant funding from a battery company related to the chinese in texas, but she did not do that with ford. she allowed that to continue with ford. she they continue to take state money and get government money to continue to bring a chinese operation in for energy. she's a dangerous person to have any type of position, let alone as energy secretary. >> brian: right. but she has the position, and seems to be hold on to it. she says she doesn't have stocks related to energy, but holds individual stocks, once held thousands of shares of ford, which ford has the lightning, the electric car, the electric truck. in the big picture, if there was anything to describe what this administration stands for, it's her department, her division, and her mission that's greening the economy, which is against our national interests, because it gives power to china, because

everything we need to green the economy they have or they control. >> absolutely, which reduces our national security. this is a national security risk. we're not energy independent. these people who continue to push this green new deal initiative, which covers more than energy, but when you talk about just the energy alone, this is taking away our power. it's ruined our relationships with saudi arabia. >> brian: it has, costing us money at the pump. tudor dixon, thank you so much. straight ahead, kamala harris got to be pretend to be president for a while, because joe biden underwent a root canal. is this another bad sign for the president's health or is he eating too much sugar? we'll discuss it.

>> president biden had a root canal today. all the ice cream, the pizza and junk food catching up to him? members of his inner circle say he eats like a child. he drinks orange gatorade all day. it's gingivitis all over again. jimmy failla is here because he also has teeth. jimmy, your reaction to the fact of the president had to go under to get that painful root canal done. that made kamala harris temporarily president of the united states. >> yeah, that's scary stuff. let's be clear. the breaking news is that the president's teeth are real. i don't know anybody that bet down in vegas based on looking at pictures of him. let's acknowledge that in this jacket, i look like a dentist that would sell prescription

pills on the side and probably get in trouble for doing that. here's the issue with the biden thing. i'm not so much concerned about the root canal as i am with the tooth fairy comes, they leave ukrainian money under the poll low. brian, really quick, this diet though, the ice cream, the peanut butter and jelly, candy, it speaks to the fact that he's probably not in charge because those are the foods of someone that you can bribe. like we both raised children. okay? ice cream is the diet of someone like hey, if you sign this executive order, we'll give you ice cream. that's the take-away here. yeah, the teeth are bad. i didn't know they were real, so this is kind of a win. >> jimmy, you have so many different areas of expertise. one was dental and now this, driving. as a formatter driving professional, take a look at a 63-year-old's driving test in

argentina. she had minor injuries. she's okay. she will go at it and hit a pole. she wanted to be a driver. do you think in your estimation in any country she would pass? >> well, listen, man, as you know, i'm a former new york city cab driver. the way this interview is going, probably a future new york city cab driver. i think in argentina, she did pass. if you've seen the driving in south america? yeah, she's probably got an a minus for, this what it comes down to with road tests, everybody focuses on driving and parallel parking. you have to charm the guy riding shotgun. she made good small talk. you'd be shocked when you can get away with on a road test. i did bad things. i wiped out garbage cans when i parallel parked. here she is licensed to drive. >> thanks, jimmy.

we'll listen to your radio show. i have to urge you to listen from 9:00 to noon. brian kilmeade show.com. and a three-hour show. mike pompeo will be here and carlie lloyd, the latest fox hire. she will be covering the women's world cup. thanks for watching. i'll be here all week. the great sean hannity is next. keep it here. >> sean: welcome to "hannity." tonight we're going to take you into one of the most liberal executive mansions in america for an exclusive interview with gavin newsome. no topic was off the table, no restrictions at all whatsoever. i did promise the governor that i would give him a chance to respond to each question without interruption. so especially in the beginning of the interview, it's less debate oriented. it's more debate oriented as