for your local fox station. that is it for us today. thank you for joining us. happy father's day to everyone celebrating today. i'm shannon bream. have a great week, or we'll see you back here next "fox news sunday." ♪ ♪ see you next weekend. ♪ ♪ mark: hello america i'm mark levin this is "life, liberty and levin." we have a lot of ground to cover, thank you for being here this is important. first tell you about this prosecutor jack smith, i call jack the ripper smith. he is a very bad guy. in my opinion, quickly as i

have told you in past, he had two major defeats with public corrupt sh corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flew tblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, i it -- it says: >> so he takes a bribe s bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set fo forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, du

does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald's career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did jock t jack the ri ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contributed positively to the campaign star sort of an alvin bragg argument.

what did the jury say: so he brings a frivolous case on 6 charges, takes a statute, dialing with elections, and pulls it out. he is rebrighting t rewriting statutes because he wants to do injustice. he is has the wrong mind set, he targets people, and hunts them and destroys them, they shipped him off to the hague to chase town genocidal maniacs, but

before that he was acting u.s. attorney in middle of tennessee, nashville. assumed he would be u.s. attorney. but who became president in 2016? actually 2017 he was sworn in donald trump, he did not appoint him as u.s. attorney, he appointed someone else. so smith resigned. he was not happy. you can see this is the first you may have heard unless you listen to my radio show, the man has a chip on his shoulder, espionage act from "1917" to last week was never used. against a former president or a former vice president or a former cabinet secretary. that was never the intention. the laws is 106 years old, note intended to be used this way. to criminalize document

cases. the presidential records act, passed in 1978, and instituted in 1981 has no criminal penalty, you can't start with a president at recording act then say, okay. let's move to the espionage act. even before there was a presidential records act. even before there was a presidential records act. the espionage act of never used against lyndon johnson who directed his staff to remove top-secret information involving the vietnam war and illegal taps on nixon's phones, that was taken by a staffer to director lbj and turned over his library they sat it on for decades, no one thought about charges anyone with espionage act. other cases too. you talk about hillary clinton, hillary clinton case so obvious. she was not even a president

or a vice president. the presidential records act does not apply to her. if you are apply anything st is espionage act and that does not apply, but okay, fine. they didn't investigate her for obstruction. even though they destroyed her past cell phones with hammers, have you tried that. so they never investigated her, or obstruction or perjury even though there were existi exist. >> she gets away scot-free. no s.w.a.t. team, why? bill clinton and the socks case for years he is recording and top-secret international stock keep it for a book to write. and his legacy and that,

keeps in his socks draw, leaving presidency, take its with him. take its all with him. nobody charged him with violating espionage actor thought about it. so what happened? judicial watch walks in said under foia freedom of information act to national archives, get those tapes, goes in front of a judge, away liftist, she went after stone. and what does he rule? i can't do anything. my hands are tied, even with judiciary review, i can't order anything. presidential records act said documents belong to president,i ex president with broad authority.

wow. the government's position. department of justice, prosecutor's position, is that was the correct decision. because they fought judicial watch. when it came to the acquisition of this information there never should have been a grand jury on the documents case, ever, never. it should never had occurred. in should never have been a search warrant, or a fbi s.w.a.t. team raid on president trump house, cobb vehicoc vehic. obstruction. if the government really felt it had to do something about this, they followed civil track, they go to a jthey get an order, a vif siv civil order. he ordered president trump and his people to turn over the documents, let's play

along and say that lawyers say no. you don't start a criminal investigation as bill barr suggests, we move from the presidential records act to the espionage -- you don't. you can go to the judge who issued the order and said we need civil contempt, hole them in contempt they never did that they didn't follow that why? they want to put donald trump in prison. that is why, hill clinton, espionage act, retained classified and unclass tied in think for a period of years, put a pry o private sever in his basement. that was illegal as it was. she lied about it. destroyed thousands of e-mails. and cell phones. never criminalized. under the espionage act. that is they talked about it, but they said we would never prosecute anyone under that act, never investigated

for obstruction. no warrant. no s.w.a.t. team, nothing. lyndon johnson nobody thought of espionage act, joe biden add senator, stealing information from from senate scif, spreading information in 4 different locations, not saying a word about it for decades, noes esano. >> jimmy carter's documents, no. mike pence? nope, bill clinton a tapes, nope, former presidents and vice presidents, nothing, i have a question for former attorneys general bill barr and others, did you read classified information in your vehicle when your driver was taking you from home to work at the justice department and back, if you dyou violated ese espionage act. a piece in "new york times," national archives and records ofs administration,

delivered a gentle request this week to representatives of former presidents and vice presidents, could you cheek please check again to see if you have any classified documents laying around. >> william the chief operating officer at archives wrote representatives of former president's and vice presidents, urging them to look again in light of discoveries made by biden, trump and pence, so for it does not appear to have yielded new act. >> wow! sense the scwt te s.w.a.t. people in baby! no, can't do, that search wa warrants. >> no. >> moving on. durham report says they treat trump one way and hillary clinton another, levin report says, they treat trump one way and

biden another. here we have daily mail. exhibit 1 gain the t 1 against bidens. exclusive: >> they set up the s corporations, analysis shows 5.2 million is unexplained -- >> exhibit 1. how about exhibit 2? "new york post":

>> exhibit 2. how about tw exhibit 3: >> wow what a coincidents.

>> 17 total recordings, bribe turns out to be closer to 10 million dollars and the fbi his the recordings. that was exhibit 3, now exhibit 4: >> tens of millions of dollars [music] pour. to pay joe biden a million bucks a year, and exhibit 5. a year ago. it says: there is is more. deal two. pay out 5 million. and there is more. deal three. pay out 188 thousand glus.

plus. and deal 4, a china energy front company. and deal 5. and another 1 million. exhibit 5. exhibit 6! >> do you remember that, it is on video for everyone to see, a prosecutor is investigating busish m burisma, this company employees hunter pays him 23 thousand a -- 83 thousand a month, some suggestion that joe biden got him the job, but the prosecutor wa corrupt they had to get rid of him really? what do we know? president biden had his

white house deputy counsel points out, jonathan su waived president's trump claim of executive privilege leading to the unprecedented raid in august biden was behind it. and merrick garland approved trump indictment, the other week. merric garland is invalved involved and white house, and white house counsel. archives does not have power to turn or request a vile criminal investigation, that is what is going on, it is sickening, i'll be

mark: welcome back america. we're with chairman james comer of house oversight committee, i think it is going a fantastic job. mr. chairman, we have alleged 17 audiotapes that were covered up by the department of justice, and fbi, they didn't want to see that. you mentioned 20 ve shell corporations to launder money from communist chinese and others to 9 members of biden family, the scorps that biden and first lady set up several years ago.

were the daily mail now reports over 5 million not accounted for in those accounts. we have millions and millions that have flowed into the family from foreign governments and state-run corporations. we have never seen anything like this. you are still fighting for information from the department of justice and the fbi. they have all this information. they must have more. they won't appoint a special counts to investigate joe biden. what do you make of this and what ca can you do next? >> i think we have done as much as we could do with be oobstacles we had, no one thought i would get bank records or access to address cabinet suspect shute activity reports but we have, we at the present time fighting and prevailed. when we got access to suspicious activity reports,

mainstream madia sai media said was there nothing, we found that wires were made to joe biden's family, while he was vice president from romania and china through the shell companies to 9 different biden family members, we found a lot out then, now we know about the form 1023 that alleges president jbribery, we know from your sources that fbi never investigated this. they never did. they will tell you, you heard in testimony, ted cruz and josh holly grilled deputy to be a fbi director, said -- they said we don't want to endanger the life of our paid informant. if this is the case, fbi is that credible, and tells the fbi that the vice president of united states took a bribe, from a foreign

national exchange for foreign policy and aid, then why did the fbi not investigate it, that is a pattern with irs whistleblower, saying irs would not investigate anything other than bassic tac-- basic tax invasion. and department of justice, there is a pattern where federal government, the deep state bureaucracies turned a blind eye to joe biden our job in house oversight committee is to follow the money we have more bank records coming in and bringing in key figures in biden family unfle unble influence schemes for deposition. >> you have to fight democrat party. which wants to cover-up the corruption. and to fight the media, which has done nothing to

independently investigate these things other than som conservative outlets, you present the information they don't take the information and run with it as only media can, but they attack you. this is the same department of justice. durham made the point, like a laser focuses on donald trump, it concocts information against donald trump, changes evidence to try to go after donald trump. works with the democrat party to go after donald trump, then drops everything when it comes to hillary clinton as they drop everything with the bidens. this oversight responsibility that you and jim jordan and others have, you are not getting a hell of a lot from senate other than a few senators like johnson and grassley, the fact of matter, this oversight responsibility if legislative as well, these institutions have to be changed. these institutions have to

lose resources, and have to stop spying on americans, and have to stop trying to destroy republican candidates, republican elections and a former republican president. this -- this is just beyond belief, are you thinking 'these things. >> absolutely, i think about it every day, more since i have started to deal with christopher wray and fbi bureaucracy. look, this is something that republicans will have to stick together on. and you will seeon an overwhelming madge f majority of house do this we need republicans to senate to stand with us, we have to demand there is new leadership in fbi, there is not a lot we can do with garland right now but we can cut their budgets. and get rid of deep state barr crasses t

bureaucrats that are problem with respect to getting the transparent truth as to public corruption and political wrong doing among liberals and democrats. i am all in i agree with you 100%, first thing i said, some i spoke to committee yesterday, we have to stick together to defund this fbi building, we cannot reward the fbi with a new state of the art, fine building that is bigger than pentagon this agency needs to be reformed and send's message we'll have to do it with the power of the purse, hopefully, truly to god republicans is stick together on this in september. >> we'll be right back.

monday, i am jon scott, now back to liv "life, liberty and levin." mark: welcome back america, we're here with chairman james comer of house oversight committee, i have an idea, among many. but one in particular, you break out enforcement mechanism from this department of justice or any different of justice with congress oversight responsibilities. and enforcing contempt votes by the house or the senate or both that is we cannot have a justice department that owes everything to the incompaincumbent president of united states krument corrupt in my view attorney general like this, has no

intention of enforcing your contempt votes or anything else we break out, you have an independent entity and you create it. a future republican president will have to sign it, so they are not beholden to an existing bureaucracy and only job is to look at the law and constitution -- a small office, a small office, where members of approved by congress. and but serves in the executive branch as required by the constitution, that is where you go when you need to enforce contempt and other things, you don't go to u.s. attorney who owes every to president. >> i think that is a great idea. i support that idea. i would vote for that right now. the fbi lost the confidents of the american people. not just having an impact on what we're doing with to respect to biden family investigation, i think that fbi agents will have a problem when they present to juries and say things like,

this particular went witness lied to the fbi, i don't think anyone will belief them right now 50% of america thinks that fbi is somewhat corrupt. they believe they are cor com compromised. christopher wray tries to alike the 202 1023 form did not exist. if the whistleblower did not brin bring it to our attention we now never know about ity have no confidence in fbi, we need to reform fbi from top to bottom. at very least, we need positioniveneed to cut their funding, i believe we need an fbi but until they demonstrate they can reform themselves we have to step in to do it right now, fbi thinks they are immune to

congressional oversight, they are not, we have to put our foot down and i love your idea. mark: a great point, we don't need a democrat party stasi, that is what we have right now, durham report ignored by media makes it clear this fbi moves in quick action even when it is creates and planting evidence and doing the bidding of a hillary clinton or a joe biden. or comes to real criminal activity this fbi conducts its poorly, the parents of this country, catholic company, pro lifers on and on, the democrat party is defending every damn step, so is biden. i think a lot of this comes from the top. he plays rope adobe with a very radical left wing staff and placing radicals all over the government, gets 3300 political appoints and used every damn slot to put

one rall radical in after the other, he they are in charge of the dmghts, th departments, who could look at this espionage act, we have never ever not since "1917", had this act used against a former president, vice president or a former cabinet secretary for god's sakes they dust it off, pull it off the shelf, it was always applied this way, they apply it against the donald trump rather than presidential recording act, which is what covered this activity. they criminalize the whole thing, then 31 coin wounds -- criminalize it, will congress look at this statute since "1917". for crying out loud. >> yeah. they are. we are. i think this senate judiciary and house judiciary both are looking at this, but with respect to

mishandling classified documents look at what joe biden did, his documents studenstrewn in 4 different locations, we suspect some are on his laptop in an e-mail, that is another missing piece, we need information, from these deep state bureaucracies and so far all they have done is play defense for the bidens. >> thank you, for everything that you do, keep it up, there are 10s of millions of americans who support what you are doing, sir. >> thank you, we're not stuffiphotog stfoe -- not doing to stop fighting. >> thank you, be well. >> >> we'll be right back.

mark: welcome back america. brent tolman was former u.s.

attorney for utah with tolman group founder, former federal prosecutor a good one, bret thank you for coming back. my specific first question to you, the espionage act has not been applied against a former president who took classify the information, we don't know of all have since now. the law was put in place in "1917", doesn't it seem this jack smith dusted it off looking for a way to get trump or am i missing something. >> i like the way you describe that. mark, the fact that reagan was in office there were a few thousand criminal statueses there are now over 300 thousand. for -- i have said for years, if we don't hold doj accountable and rein in their power they have ability to maneuver, pick

and choose statutes they want to apply, if they want they could make that office, you know a political weapon, against those they don't like. i have watched in increase. now you see the absolute pinnacle of using your office to go after someone that you don't like rather than someone that committed a crime, and espionage i would add, there is no reasonable prosecutor who is fairly looking at the law who would utilize the espionage act gaingt against a former president who had classified documents in their position. mark: no reasonable attorney general who would approve it i worked for one ed meese, if i went into his office and said jimmy carter has a document, we could use this section, a strict liability statute. let's search his -- he would

say get the hell out of my office, take a nap, maybe have a lunch. we don't do that. we don't create this kind of drama in a nation like this. with bureaucrat investigators, powercr bureaucrat prosecutors and so oi lay this responsible brett tolman at attorney general garland this case could not be criminalized without the approval of white house it was by white house counsel was on the, when joe biden said i'm not involved, and not paying attention that dishonest this thing was unleashed by the white house. >> you are 100% right, i heard white house attempt to distance themselves, looking at this realistically, i love that you brought up attorney general ed meese, i remember, he would call prosecutors up and ca congratulate them when they

declined a case for exercises their dischristi discretion properly, we a long way from that, we have here a little, di vi vindictive, petty man in attorney general garland here, is utilizing his power in an injust way, and white house has to be onboard. there are liaisons between the president and attorney general they communicate daily, there is no chance in hell that this president, did not get the green light to attorney general garland. mark: you are right. high can fake it all he wants, he is a cere is a serial liar and has been. garland continues to be

involved. he is diabolical and been involved in holding back the martiawell,ials from protects justice and brought political cases again republican say the legislators. he doesn't pull the trigger with enforcing immigration laws. i would say he is the biggest political hack in modern times. via attorney general, and h he is angry he is not on supreme court. >> i believe that vindictiveness coming out again republicans and political opponents, i think that is a direct result of him being so upset about not getting on the supreme court. and you know for me, i look at this, i think about jack smith and him sent out like a missile gaining their largest political opponent.

and i think about the fact that so many people think that there is some seriousness to this charge. indictment reads you know that these are you know very large violations of the law. i could take and put in front of the grand jury all of the people that transfered and moved joe biden's classified documents, i could put his son in the front of a grand jury, and his lawyers like jack smith did and violate attorney-client triv la attractive la-- but i wouldn't do it because it is not the proper use of the criminal law. take back those documents. and you know, warn them and let them go. but now they have changed the game. now they are charging a political opponent who has stronger defenses than joe biden, hillary clinton, or

any of those who they have given a past to over past decade. it is outrageous to those of us who served in department of justice we're upset we see that department of justice griefnedded i ground into the ground. >> only way to stop it, i don't mean to be provocative but use is against them, they will then understand and back off and sue, we'll be right back. (dr. aaron king) if you have diabetes, getting on dexcom is the single most important thing you can do. it eliminates painful finger sticks, helps lower a1c, and it's covered by medicare. before using the dexcom g7, i was really frustrated. all of that finger pricking and my a1c was still stuck. my diabetes was out of control. (female announcer) dexcom g7 sends your glucose numbers to your phone or dexcom receiver without painful finger sticks.

the arrow shows the direction your glucose is heading-- up, down, or steady-- and because dexcom g7 is the most accurate cgm, you can make better decisions about food, medication, and activity in the moment. after using the dexcom g7, my a1c has never been lower. i lead line dancing three times a week, and i'm just living a great life now. (donna) it's so easy to use. dexcom g7 has given me confidence and control, everything i need is right there on my phone. (female announcer) dexcom is the number one recommended cgm brand. call now to get started on dexcom g7.

mark: welcome back america. brett tolman, you see case again joe biden is enormous, in case terms of triggering appointment of a special count that line has been passed 10 times for a guy who is trigger happy this attorney general and appointment of special counsel, with donald trump, this was a bizarre appointment. how does he justify or does he? not doing the same thing or appointing a special counsel with biden? >> it is an inconsistency that is right in front of us

and a slap in the face for those of who who see the decision making. here you have joe biden, and you have his son hunter biden, setting up a scheme to enrich themselves and families be. we see two sides of the scheme, now there is a side of the one who was involved in the scheme with them. involving the 10 million will ddollars that gets transferred and the family setting up the llc 's and the way to move the money, they have been hiding and in plain sight because fbi has contributed to their ability too hide and have confident that nothing will happen to them. if there was ever a case, and i have spoken to you know senator lee. good friend of mine, and others in congress, they are enraged at fact they are ones that have to try to expose what the biden scheme

is about instead of the well equipped and armed commen department of justice, they have ignored it, delayed it, now american people have zero confidence that administration of justice will be fairly applied against anyone regardless of politics. >> do you think that if donald trump and his family set up 20 llc's shell corporations and received millions of dollar from the communist chinese and romanians. do you think they, would be treated the way that biden is? do you think if they have -- allegations of audiotapes, and fbi of covering up. do you think that trump family would get away with this? you think if donald trump actually made a call to ukraine to threaten a prosecutor who was investigating the company that his son of the working

for and paying 83 thousand a month, do you think it would have trigger aide criminal investigation or impeachment inquiry, we would be done and over with joe biden in 6 months. >> i think within 6 months, you are right. trump would have been indicted, every member of hits family would be indicted. they would charge every llc, and every company they have, then charge the executives in burisma who participated in this scheme. and that would happen with a 150 page indictment, and they would seize all of their assets. that would happen. with any other prosecutor, i had a case similar where they set up dozens of llc's, and funneled all kinds of money threw them, they got charged, and went to federal prison. for nearly 20 years. >> i justme want public to

understand, you have formal federal prosecutor comes on, they are just playing politics. >> brett tolman thank you, god bless, good luck. >> thank you, mark. mark: we'll be right back.

>> welcome back america happyfas out there as the democrats like to say non- breathing person. i want to say this to the little girl in arkansas who has a despicable father who won't even recognize her in a despicable grandfather who pretend she doesn't exist. happy little girl's day to you. we will put it at that. look ladies and gentlemen, we are in deep trouble in this country, what's going on with fbi and the department of justice and the white house and the corrupt media and corrupt

culture. we have to keep her chin up and stay united and keep fighting this stuff. we have no choice. our ancestors the greatest country in the face of the earth and if we don't fight this our children are not going to receive it. that's what this is all about. i'll see you next time on life, liberty and belo ♪ ♪ >> good evening and thank you for joining us. i'm trey gowdy and this isec "special editionia sunday nightn america." in 1984 the republicanes presidential candidateid won 49 out of 50 states.es it was an overwhelming victorymi inng both the electoral college and the popular vote.ge he won california and new york. the one state he lost was his opponent's home state of minnesota. and even then he onl