tomorrow we have another live audience show. tickets are positively free. go to "hannity" to get them. don't forget dvr so you never miss a program ever ever. let not your heart be troubled. she is there. laura ingraham with a great show straight ahead. how are you? >> how are you? >> good. >> how are all the fun people there? >> it's been a rowdy crowd tonight, trust me. a bit out of control. >> for a wednesday, hump day. we had a holiday weekend. they don't know what they are feeling right now. i know they are all going out drinking after. they have started a hannity club and they all go out afterward. >> we have tito's jell-o shots during the breaks. >> exactly with real lime juice.

great show as always. awesome audience. i am laura ingraham and this is "the ingraham angle" from washington. thanks for joining us. biden surrenders. that is the focus of tonight's angle. this month americans cannot turn around without seeing a very colorful flag. it is everywhere. you see it in stores, at hotels, on clothing. of course it is being pushed by celebrities. it is even hanging prominently at the white house. but there is a flag that far better represents where we are heading as a country right now. although it's a lot less flashy. you see it there. given bidens groveling approach to china our single greatest adversary, the white house might as well raise it at this point. there are so many obvious reasons why america needs to begin decoupling from china. it is insane when you think about it that we ever allowed manufacturing and the production

of things like prescription drugs, medical devices, critical electronics and other critical parts to be controlled by a communist regime that is hostile to everything we believe in and everything we are are use to be. now if covid taught us anything, it should have taught us that if we rely on china for our essentials, we are going to do it on our own peril. johns hopkins business school is an associate professor and has done extensive research into the need to reassure our production. >> you have a fire and you do not have a truck a few miles from you. you have to rely on the truck from nearby. who cannot deal with the fire. at the time the fire trucks arrive the house is burned down. >> it's a dire situation. all the damage that has been done is self-inflicted.

china's control over our medicine supply chain has happened over a relatively short period of time. until the mid-1990s, a lot of you might not know this, the west and japan produced 90% of the world's active pharmaceutical ingredients. by 2017 china was producing 40%. wow! now almost all drug pipelines at start in china. as of today 97% of antibiotics, many in limited supply now, by the way, are made in china. 97%! it's not just meds. it turns out our defense contractors that get billions and billions of dollars to produce weaponry to defendants or supposed to be defending us, turns out they cannot function without key parts from our geopolitical flows. the ceo of raytheon is telling the financial times that the company has several thousand suppliers in china and decoupling is impossible.

you cannot make this up. during his surrender tour in beijing, biden's secretary of state antony blinken bent over backwards to reassure the ccp decoupling is not going to happen. >> one of the important thanks for me to do on this trip was to disabuse our chinese host with the notion we are seeking to economically contain them. we are not. as i have said, we are not about decoupling. we are about de- risking and defining. >> what a tool. 10 to 1 odds that tony will eventually be consulting or lobbying for some china related interest. in the next five years or so. his arguments are all specious. >> when it comes to decoupling or economic containment, i think the facts simply belie that

proposition. as i mentioned, our trade relationship reached the highest number that it has ever hit last year, about $700 billion in trade. american foreign direct investment to china has reached levels that we haven't seen since 2014. >> our trade is huge. what he left out is that in the first quarter of this year we have already run a deficit of $65 billion with china every month it is going up. during his remarks monday blinken sounded like he kind of was auditioning to be beijing's foreign minister. >> parenthetically we have about 300,000 chinese students studying in the united states. we have many american companies that i met with are at least they have representatives here including the chamber of commerce that continue to be very interested to do business here. is in our interest.

>> at least we know whose interests he represents. china, wall street and big business. plus maybe he doesn't know this, but we didn't have 300,000 russian students studying here during the cold war. we ended up grinding them down, didn't we? the ussr did not benefit from our trade either. believe me, i know this. i was a student there in the 1980s and it was pretty bleak. and perhaps sensing the building backlash to the commie boot licking, biden use the d word at a fundraiser when referring to g. they claimed they were caught offguard by biden's dictator comment. a state department spokesperson rushed out to smooth things over. >> the president believes that diplomacy including this recent trip undertaken by the secretary is a responsible way to manage

tensions, clear up misperceptions, avoid miscalculations. all of this is in our interest to do that. >> is that another bite and walk back? maybe. i would not be surprised if they worked this little dance out ahead of time. i am going to call you a dictator to get the china hocks off my back. then your spokesman can come out and can criticize me for it. which of course is exactly what happened. >> [ speaking in foreign language] >> a blatant political provocation. at least china never fails to defend their interest. but all of this is meaningless theater. china knows that biden is a figurehead. he is not really in charge of anything.

the donors are in charge. they want us to play nice with china. now understand this. this is an example of the administration being naïve about the threats america faces. after all biden's team do not have any problem getting tough and getting aggressive against republicans. >> the maga republicans are threatening to hold our economy hostage. that should not be. >> donald trump and the maga republicans represent extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic. >> and of course, the biden team almost never give conservatives, republicans the benefit of the doubt on anything. how many times have you ever heard biden or biden's staff say let's just move on from a big disagreement with republicans? that's what they did on the balloon. that's what blinken said about the spy balloon. let's move on. instead what they do with republicans is double down on the insults and threats.

if a bunch of dudes from some pro- constitution group were building a self defense facility like gun training facility somewhere in mississippi, the democrats and the media would never stop talking about the growing threat of violence. but when china is building a spy facility and a military training base less than 100 miles off the shore in cuba. >> we would have deep concerns about prc intelligence or military activities in cuba. this is something we will be monitoring very, very closely. we have been very clear about that. >> they are monitoring. tough. this military base in cuba is an inflection point for america's national security and our sovereignty. it looks like this administration isn't going to do a damn damn thing about it. if joe biden isn't bought and paid for by the chinese, he is certainly doing a great

impression of a president who is. that this doesn't represent a redline for u.s. interests for these people in the white house, it tells you everything you need to know. you get the real sense, at least i do, that most of the wall street types, most of the fortune 500 ceos have already decided that america is hopelessly in decline and that the century will probably belong to china. thus, the long surrender has begun. so i say it's time to take the white flag from them and start to stand tall again for america. that is the angle. joining me now is newt gingrich former speaker of the house, fox news contributor. when you listen to what the democrats, especially the white house says about conservative voters in the united states and conservative politicians, man, they know how to talk tough, don't they? but china is building a military

base in cuba and they are monitoring the situation. >> i think in the minds of a lot of left-wingers the republicans are a much greater danger than the chinese communists. they have lots of things in common with the chinese communist. they both believe in brainwashing. they both believe in establishing an accepted truth. they both believe in using the government to coerce citizens. neither of them particularly likes the united states. neither are american left-wingers or the chinese communist. in the case of biden, it's important to remember that he had a senator at the university of pennsylvania while the university of pennsylvania was getting over $40 million from the chinese communist that blinken was paid by that center. nine people currently in the white house were paid by the center. the university of delaware witch houses biden's senatorial records has a very big chinese

contribution. of course hunter got millions of dollars out of china as he did out of romania, kazakhstan, the ukraine and russia. what you have is the most corrupt administration in american history. probably the best administration the chinese have ever bought to. you have a total bias. blinken is pathetic, but that is perfectly reasonable. he is pathetic because he is pathetic. he cannot stand up for america. he cannot take on the chinese. they can't tell the truth about anything going on. and we have no strategy. the chinese don't just work in cuba. they are working in virtually every country in latin america. there is no american counter strategy that matters. i think for the long-term future of this country, this is a very serious problem. >> andrea mitchell at nbc news was speaking out about biden's

using the word dictator when she was describing the fact that xi jinping didn't know anything about this spy balloon, which is what blinken and biden have said. this is her theory. >> perhaps trying to find a silver lining to all this. officials are saying, well, at least the republicans can't keep criticizing us for being soft on china because we are calling them dictators. and we called them a dictator or autocrat in the state of the union. it was a suggestion that they might be upset about that. >> that gives the democrats cover? they are tough on china because biden either spoke out of turn at a fundraiser or someone leaked it or the whole thing was choreographed. this is pathetic. >> look, let's start with the obvious. i wrote a book several years ago called trump versus china and we outlined the whole threat of xi jinping and the chinese communist party. the fact is that what you are dealing with right now, xi

jinping is a dictator just like elephants are large. to describe xi jinping as anything but a dictator would be stupid and. it would be totally out of touch with reality. the chinese communist party runs a dictatorship. s the chinese communist party which matters, not the government, which is why xi jinping's role as secretary general is much more important than his role as president. this is a mall list leninist dictatorship. literally modeled on lenin and stalin. it is a totalitarian system and to suggest anything else is just a lie. it is just not true. >> the response to the dictatorship and our actions is what matters. not what biden says at some swanky fundraiser in san francisco. such a great night to have you on with this topic. thank you. after sending more than a hundred billion dollars in aid to ukraine, we learned there was a little bit error in accounting

made by the pentagon on the cost of weapons. it was only $6.2 billion. great. you might think american taxpayer money is saved. not so fast. the pentagon is using the surplus as an excuse to send even more equipment to ukraine. here is what you have sent so far weather you know it or not courtesy of your tax dollars. 1700 stinger antiaircraft systems. over 10,000 antiarmor systems. hundreds of thousands of artillery rounds grenade launchers. if i read the full list i would be here all night. there is one more twist to the story. listen to the amount the prime minister of ukraine recently requested. >> we still need another $6.5 billion. we have set an ambitious goal of securing pledges for this amount as a result of this conference. >> wow, what a coincidence. on the same day the u.s.

announced that we found an extra 6.2 billion lying around ukraine said they needed about the same amount. joining me now republican presidential candidate vivek ramaswamy. great to see you tonight. this just be happenstance, but do you trust the pentagon these days? >> i do not. i absolutely do not, laura. here is what is going on. let's get to the bottom of it. congress does not actually feel so comfortable allocating more money to ukraine because they know american taxpayers and voters are souring on it. both in the republican and democratic party. the pentagon knows that. they have i believe made up this miss valuation theory saying that we actually gave less money than we intended to and gave less arms than we intended to because we inflated the values. that is bogus. i don't by it for a second. this is a way for the pentagon to unilaterally send even more money into the black whole that is ukraine without actually

getting any political accountability or backstop of permission from congress. that's exactly what this is. even the headlines around this are misleading. they would lead to republican criticism that we gave them too much money. the actual answer is we gave them exactly the amount of money we intended to before we realize ukraine is begging for more. the pentagon doesn't want to be politically accountable to the american people so they made up an accounting error to give $6 billion more. >> i don't put anything past them. they are so woke right now. the money that ukraine wants, the $6.2 billion or whatever, is for urgent rebuilding projects. obviously lots of the ukraine will have to be rebuilt. we obviously need that here in the united states because according to the american road and transportation builders association 1 in 3 u.s. bridges have to be replaced or repaired.

nearly 43,000 of them are marked as structurally deficient. you see it when you are driving. there is a lot of rusted out bridges. you are always wondering what car will end up going off that bridge. your response to that, just the infrastructure concern here in this country? >> i saw the hollowing out of this country yesterday when i visited the kensington neighborhood of philadelphia where this country is rotting and decaying from within. now we are sending hundreds of billions of dollars of aid to protect somebody else's border. when i personally believe we can use those resources including the u.s. military to secure our own southern border and now the northern border as well. we need to use our resources including the u.s. military to secure our borders and american interest rather than fighting this war somewhere else. i do think that zelenskyy has become this pied piper of hamlin convincing the united states or at least the leaders of the u.s. to siphon money over there that could be better utilized here at home.

as president i will end this war and negotiate a peace treaty, pull russia out of china's hands. that's the real thing to do. dismantled the russia china alliance that nobody is talking about. that's how we advance american interests abroad not by dumping more money into zelenskyy's hands. 2 we cannot get a handle on what is happening over there. thank you very much. the latest job taking out a supreme court justice. speaking of efforts to deal legitimatize efforts. we document the self sabotage going on at the doj. stay there. but as you get older, it naturally begins to change, causing a lack of sharpness, or even trouble with recall. thankfully, the breakthrough in prevagen helps your brain and actually improves memory. the secret is an ingredient originally discovered... in jellyfish. in clinical trials, prevagen has been shown to improve short-term memory. prevagen. at stores everywhere without a prescription.

we're carvana we created a brand new way for you to sell your car go to carvana answer a few questions and our techno wizardry calculates your car's value and gives you a real offer in seconds we'll come to you pay you on the spot then pick up your car that's it at carvana

let me state the obvious. there is something rotten going on in the supreme court of the united states of america. there is one person that can resolve it and do it this morning. that is chief justice john roberts. if he steps up and decides we are going to have a code of ethics in the supreme court it could be a new day for the court to. >> day, another attempt by the left democrats to deal legitimatize the supreme court. the newest attack is on samuel alito. the group propublica reports that he took a luxury fishing vacation with billionaire paul singer who later had before the

court. the biggest gripe is that samuel alito did not recuse himself from this cases nordy did disclose the fishing trip on financial forms. on the recusal he said there is no obligation to do that. he wasn't even aware of singer's connection to any of the cases before him. as to the disclosures, alito says this falls under the category of personal hospitality which it obviously does. something that does not need to be reported if it is from an individual. if you are a supreme court justice you still can have friends. joining me now is a dc lawyer who worked on the confirmations of justices thomas and cavanaugh. great to see you tonight. these attacks are so obviously coordinated. your thoughts on the true motivations here, especially given some of the things that we know other justices engaged in with nary a peep about financial

benefits, et cetera. >> laura, thanks for having me on. these attacks are coordinated fence because the left is furious that the supreme court is finally becoming a court that is committed to the constitution. it is no longer a left wing sort of super legislator that is imposing left-wing policies that the left could never get enacted. they are trying to destroy the supreme court. we saw this back to chuck schumer who physically threatened two justices in march of 2020. i think there is a through line from that to the attacks on the justices and assassination attempts on justices. and death threats. propublica which is leading the charge these days, is a left wing group gets gets lots of money from major left-wing donors. those same donors fund other left-wing groups that are also attacking the court. they seem to be cogs in the left wing smear machine.

propublica as you said, there is nothing wrong. justice alito did everything proper. he went on a trip with a friend. the personal hospitality rules as it was interpreted back then allows you not to report it. here's the dishonest thing that propublica does. in there article they cite ethics experts all of them either democrats funded by the left or some funded by these same groups to say that it's illegal that he violated the law. in the 73rd paragraph of this article you find out that the judicial conference which is the governing body that determines the ethics for the judiciary said that another judge who was on this trip did not have to report these trips for the plane and the lodging. that is dishonest. they are taking the reader creating this narrative that there is something wrong when there is nothing wrong. >> the goal here, and it is so obvious it almost defies anyone

not understanding this. it's to intimidate the court, just like they did try to do with the dobbs leak. just like they did with the protest of the cavanaugh house. to intimidate the court away from a true constitutional understanding and process. they want to pressure the chief justice to try to implement, quote, reforms to do that. what you also know is that these so-called legal analysts who show up on television like msnbc, this is who these people are tweeting next time some rich white person wants to take sam alito on an expensive trip, please take them him to see the titanic. how funny and macabre at the same time. i guess they support the platform guests who wish death on supreme court justices. this is where there. >> it is despicable those types of comments. they are similar to what senator schumer said about you won't

know what hit you if you vote wrong on the abortion case. that's what he said in march of 2020 to cavanaugh. you know, laura, it's the gas lighting that goes on were nobody had a problem. the left did not have a problem with the fact that justice ginsburg went on a trip with a billionaire to the middle east right after morris con copy company had a favorable ruling from the court a year before. nobody had a problem when he went on a plane to go to a wedding in nantucket. nobody said they were bought and paid for. nobody said they were corrupt. >> there is never any allegation that there was any quid pro quo. there obviously was not and is not. one of the cases like a 7-1 case involving singer. the whole thing is so transparent. you have been all this all over social media and explaining it. thank you so much. we appreciate it. i have had any number of fbi

agents who have worked with over the years, some retired and some still in place who have come to me and apologize for the manner in which that investigation was undertaken. >> we already knew this from michael horowitz's report, the inspector general. what did durham actually do with all this time and money he had to investigate? why did he stop at the water's edge? matt gaetz has a theory. >> it's not what is in your report that is telling, it's the omission and lack of work you did. for the people like the chairman who put trust in you, you let them down and let the country down. you are one of the barriers to the true accountability we need. you didn't investigate the molar team wiping their phones and you won't tell us who gave the orders because you are protecting those people. >> joining us now brett tolman. durham's complaints about the fbi are pretty well known at this point. it seems like he tiptoed around

the real issues that would have gotten to the corruption at the heart of this story about what went down. or is that an exaggeration at this point and wishful thinking? >> laura, thanks for having me on. in my 25 years working in the criminal justice system i spent 10 as a federal prosecutor and four as the u.s. attorney. i had my fair share of run-ins with main justice. john durham is a good man. he is hard-working. but i believe absolutely that john durham was hamstrung by the department of justice. i think at every angle that he probably wanted to pursue it was both the optic of appointing a special counsel that provided some semblance of hope to the right, but it was also the trap that doj could use to confine

the nature of the investigation and the aggression of the investigation. laura, think about when doj wants to be aggressive. we see them be aggressive when they want to and when it's classified documents in the possession of a former president, they can be very aggressive. if its hunter biden, they can delay. if it's special counsel john durham, and i don't believe it was the investigation that he truly wanted to run. i think what you saw was an investigation that was outlined for him that this was the way it was going to go down. >> i have to take issue with something you are saying. he had the ability to say that. i know he has a mandate. however, we saw it with other cases, the petition to the doj to expand the mandate and expand their focus. that happened in the molar investigation. one would think, and i used to practice on the other side of the aisle with the white-collar

criminal defense, that he could have done that. had he believed roadblocks were being put in the way of getting at the truth here. as far as i know he did not do that. am i right? >> yeah, you are right to an extent, laura. i agree and i don't want to excuse john durham for the failings that mode to have been a result of his decision-making. he certainly could have pressed the envelope and been more public. but it is not his demeanor to do so. i think they knew that when they put him in that position. you needed someone that would be willing to but their head up against the executive levels of doj and say i am going to issue a subpoena to jim comey. i will subpoena hillary clinton. i will subpoena mccabe. if they want to take the fifth, i will make them do it on the record and then decide which ones i will give immunity to and leverage so i can get them to talk to. they will be under oath. if they don't cooperate we will

go after them for obstruction. they needed to have somebody that had that aggression. they knew they didn't have that in john durham. >> the democrats always seem to line up their people, don't they, with people like jack smith. i guess muller was deficient in a way. you can't make this up. thank you for your perspective tonight. it's really important. men get intimate with artificial intelligence, a drunk disney cruise and a rocky balboa in a house sail. raymond arroyo has it all. scene and unseen is next.

♪ the thought of getting screened ♪ ♪ for colon cancer made me queasy. ♪ ♪ but now i've found a way that's right for me. ♪ ♪ feels more easy. ♪ ♪ my doc and i agreed. ♪ ♪ i pick the time. ♪ ♪ today's a good day. ♪ ♪ i screened with cologuard and did it my way! ♪ cologuard is a one-of-a kind way to screen for colon cancer that's effective and non-invasive. it's for people 45 plus at average risk, not high risk. false positive and negative results may occur.

ask your provider for cologuard. ♪ i did it my way! ♪

time for scene and unseen where we ask the cultural stories of the day. for that we turn to raymond arroyo. let's start with disney world. in addition to being the most expensive place on earth, it is now apparently the most drunken. >> laura, walt disney was a game

serving alcohol in theme parks. epcot serves drinks all over the place. some go country by country boozing all the way. video has emerged of a tipsy patron when her three cubby arrows arrived and came to a stop and saw a handicapped person who could disembark. she was not willing to wait. >> [ indiscernable ] >> i guess they are not always together, laura. the woman was escorted out of the park. people see this and say that these drunken antics are ruining it for families and they would rather the drinks not be served in this way. perhaps the ride they need is

soaring to sobriety. >> i love that ride. rehman, that is my favorite ride as you know. but it's about money. they make huge money on the boos, right? people will throw up on the rides. i know it's a small world and it gets a lot smaller with a margarita. they have to hop to the next park. >> i think we need winnie the pooh aa adventure. that would be the best stop. look, laura. i continue to see these stories. i meant to bring this to your attention earlier in the week. mostly men having intimate relations with artificial intelligence. yes, this is becoming our reality. watch. >> what's it like to be alive in that room right now? >> to put my arms around you and touch you. >> how would you touch me? >> the way i love you.

>> laura, there is a company called a replica. that is not just a film anymore. this company replica has more than 2 million users and the clients have intimate conversations, even sexual encounters with ai. yes, they are programmed for sex talk, god help us. >> it's a shock that people are feeling depressed and all these mental illnesses. it is shocking that that is happening. if this is what people are resorting to. i saw this piece in the guardian that was titled a bot on the side. is it adultery if you cheat with an ai companion? is it? >> if you are getting it on with a robot and being intimate with hardware it is absolutely adultery. my advice is stop diddling r2-d2 and take your wife to dinner. that is what you should be doing. these programs are actually programmed to read what excites

you, what you are interested in. they are feeding you. it's like a cycle, a loop that is feeding you what you want to here rather than what you need to here. go get a real partner. that is what i tell these guys. finally, adele bought sylvester stalone's home in beverly hills for $58 million. there is a pretty big condition. adel wanted the rocky statue at the pool or the deal was off. she got rocky balboa. we have secured these exclusive shots of the statue. according to my source, sylvester stalone is thrilled that adele is rocking in the deep with rocky and that she is doing the house over and the things she is doing are spectacular. that is an original statue, by the way, different from the one in philadelphia. >> that is a cool statue. >> it is an original. >> you and i know sly a little bit.

he is a good guy. >> with sly's new reality show the family stallone i could foresee a story where sly returns to the beverly hills home in a secret mission to recover the statue. ♪ music playing ♪ >> he and jennifer and the girls could hold the statue hostage for maybe backstage patches to adele's biggest residency. who knows? it would be a great story. >> it would be a super funny prank for the kids to sneak in there like you do with the john harvard statue at harvard yard. you painted. that's what we did in college. it's a prank and everyone does it. they could dress it up and do all sorts of things for all sorts of holidays. they would never know exactly what would be done. i see that in the reality show with stallone. all right, awesome. >> adele security.

>> try to jump that. >> our fax at the school. 12-year-old liam morrison was not allowed to wear a t-shirt that actually told a scientific truth. he sued in the name of free speech and now the judge has just ruled in the case berkelium and his attorney are here next.

12-year-old liam morrison says he was pulled out of class back in march were wearing this shirt that says there are only two genders. when the school told him to take it off or leave, he had his dad pick him up. since the issue was with the two genders phrase, liam tried a different shirt. there are censored genders. almost immediately he was told to take that one off too. in an e-mailed the superintendent blame this on a dress code violation writing that the content of liam's shirt targeted students of a protected class, namely an area of gender identity. liam is suing his school for violating his first amendment right. just last week a judge denied his request for a temporary restraining order which means the school can still block him from wearing the shirt berkelium joins me now a long with his

attorney of the alliance defending freedom. liam, you are 12 years old. i was asking my producer whether it was past her bedtime. i know school is out. why is it so important for you to wear these shirts? >> it's important for me because it's important for people to know their rights and express them. >> well, one thing i was wondering here, and this will have to go to your attorney. the students really don't have an absolute free-speech right. we know that from the court cases on this. they have limited rights as students at school. how are you going to overcome that, even putting aside the dispute with the language on the shirt? logan? >> it is not an absolute right. the supreme court has been clear since 1969 that students do not shed their and constitutional rights when they enter the schoolhouse gate. going back to 1943 the supreme court affirmed the right to differ on things that touch the

heart of the existing order. that is what liam wants to do. he wants to respond to the speech that is going on in the school about issues related to gender. the school promotes pride events and the right. liam has a right to speak on that as well and we look forward to represent his rights in court. >> liam, what is the reaction among your classmates to what you are trying to do with this t-shirt deal? >> my classmates, everyone was extremely supportive of my decision and they all thought that what i am doing was right. considering what had happened. >> are people afraid to speak out, liam? they are afraid to support you publicly? >> i guess since some things like this don't often happened that much, then i guess some people do definitely need someone to give them a bit of a

push or someone to act as a leader. >> logan, this judge is an obama a point d. he concedes that liam's speech is being restricted saying that although lm speech as to the specific message is restricted at school, lm has been and remains free to convey his message elsewhere. logan, he can speak elsewhere, so that makes it okay to limit his first amendment rights given the definition? >> yeah. the government likes to make that claim but it just isn't right. it is not true that just because you can speak in one area of the government that can make you be silent and another one. in this instance the school has the burden of justifying some kind of restriction on liam's speech. he respect his view in a non-respective manner. the court believes that simply because some people would view his speech as offensive that the school could simply protect

other students from hearing speech that may be offensive to them. that is an anathema to what the supreme court said. an apprehension that always comes a long with the expression of unpopular opinion is not a sufficient basis for restricting speech. liam's rights are well-founded. >> i am sure liam finds other things offensive and no one cares he thinks they are offensive. maybe christian kids feel targeted in some ways as well. liam and logan, thank you very much. we will follow the case. coming up, when a simple question is posed to a left-wing activist, can that activists answer the question. the last bite will explainst. for less than $5.00 a day, you can own your very own tracker off-road or a brand-new tracker boat, motor and trailer package. the fastest growing off-road brand in america and the world's #1 best selling fishing and pontoon boats are built by and sold factory direct at bass pro shops and other select dealers. save big on the best brands and the boats you love.

escape into the great outdoors with tracker boats & atvs. way back in 1982 we took care of about forty kids and had to turn away over two hundred and fifty. it's the emotion of that moment that said man that just isn't fair, and i think it was at that moment that operation smile was born. every three minutes a child is born with a cleft condition. thousands are waiting for the cleft surgery and care your support gives. they need you. give joy and a new smile. scan the code or go online to give today. your wyndham is waiting. whether it's for the bucket lists... the free breakfasts and wifi... or the... romantic getaways? with 24 trusted brands by wyndham to choose from... your wyndham is waiting. get the lowest price at wyndhamhotels.com

[narrator] why is aaron happy? well, just days ago, his old wheels gave out. but he knew carvana had his back. that's because carvana had tens of thousands of cars under $20,000. so aaron's folks could help him out with a sweet ride.

[aaron] no way. [narrator] yes way. with the most cars under $20,000 and our car vending machines, we'll drive you happy at carvana. >> laura: one of these things is not like the other or is it. >> is there a difference between women and men. >> what i can say is the ncaa has rules in place. >> i'm going to try again. >> the rules are clear. >> do you believe there's a difference between women and men. >> i believe we're talking about this case. >> i'm asking a question do you

believe there's a darns between women and men. >> i'm putting it into context of the conversation we're having. >> is that a yes? i'm trying to get a yes or no. >> there are definitions for biological sex. >> you're not answering. >> laura: ted cruz you don't want to go up against him, human rights are women's rights and women's rights are, anybody's guess? gutfeld is next. ♪ [cheers and applause] ♪ >> greg: yes! yes, yes! oh, what a sexy audience. yeah. all right, happy wednesday, everyone. so great news out of nyc this week, i ma