>> breaking news from china this morning. u.s. treasury secretary janet yellen is there right now, trying to ease growing tensions between the super powers. she's meeting with the vice-premier taking way longer than expected. and more on the high stakes talksment i guess they rolled out the red carpet for her, right? >> yes, they did.

a stark difference from antony blinken. she's back at her hotel and followed a dinner with the chinese central bank. this is the most busy day that the secretary had in beijing today which culminated with china's new vice-premier. it was supposed to last for three hours and went more than five hours. in the opening remarks, the secretary pointed to a record number of bilateral trade for the reason for not decoupling and added this. >> i also believe that the united states and china should seek a relationship of healthy economic competition that is not winner take all, but with a fair set of rules would benefit both. >> and the trade deficit heavily favors china. the readout from the secretary says that she raised concerns and it was a candid,

constructed and comprehensive meeting. the new vice-premier took appointed approach in the beginning of the meeting and even mentioning quotes some airships happened causing difficulty in the relationship. >> authorized by president xi jinping and the principal on the chinese side with the united states i stand ready to work with madam secretary to come to understandings reached between the two presidents and have dialog and communication on topics such as macroeconomic policies and economy. >> and china wants the u.s. to drop export controls on advanced technology and keep the status quo which includes stealing up to 600 billion a year for u.s. companies in intellectual property and other theft and a senior treasury official set the expectations for this trip very low saying the secretary just wanted to come in and reestablish

communications so there's no misunderstandings and listen to china's concerns, david. david: edward lawrence, safe travels. thank you very much. president biden kept most of the trump trade sanctions against china, but secretary yellen wants to release many of them saying they're bad for inflation. that contradiction being glaring, great to see you, kathy, thanks for coming in person. so secretary yellen says, i'm quoting her and we just heard the sound bite, we wanted a fair set of rules. when did the ccp follow a fair set of rules. they seem to violate every. >> it's well-known. and having some concessions by the other part, secretary yellen is correct in saying last year we saw a record

bilateral trade relationship with china and it's an inextrickable relationship. we benefit from them, they benefit from us. namely our farmers. trade with china can supply one million jobs here in the united states. 7 1/2% of our imports, of our exports go to china. 16% of our imports come from china. david: that's a great point to bring up. a lot of the concessions on china from taking our farming products game from the trump administration when you had bieb bob lighthouser, and she's playing softball. >> and china expects that hard-handed approach and we've received some concessions and we're currently at a junction, david, i think is really pivotal to our relationship going forward. the fact is we used to meet

with our treasury secretary and their counterpart, used to meet every six months or so and now that relationship is at a stalemate. i think that even communication is positive because it's one thing to talk about national security interests and we're doing that, we're limiting investment in china and we're limiting what the chinese can do here in the united states, but this decoupling idea can be catastrophic for our own economies. we want to avoid that type of jargon. david: what we eliminate or hold back on they're doing the same thing. they have new rules that prevent minerals and metals that they mine, not necessarily in china, but mine them in africa and everything and refine them in china, they limit our ability to get these items that we need for batteries and everything. so it's-- i mean, there's plenty of room on both sides to negotiate, but again, i bring up the point of bob lighthizer, are they going

to play good cop, bad cop. is janet yellen playing good cop and do they have somebody for bad cop? >> and two-thirds of tariffs remain in place. we would not to give away something before we see it go in return. as you mentioned, david, recently in the tit-for-tat, they've limited input of minerals for chip production and that will affect apple and 50% of our supply of those metals come from china. china itself provides 80% of those two minerals globally. this is an aggressive gesture that china placed on the u.s. david: it comes at a time when our own, i think it was epa prevented mining for some of the metals and minerals that we need that we're getting now from china. we could get a lot of that stuff here if it wasn't for the rules that the epa and the biden administration have made

preventing that mining here. >> friend shoring is important. defending our national interest on control of sensitive controls and sensitive products is good. subsidizing made in america is good. the decoupling-- risking decoupling i think would be catastrophic for the economy, china and the globe. david: thank you for coming in. we go from talks with china to conflict with russia. we're hearing that russian fighter jets were harassing drones over syria for third consecutive day. and in one russian planes actually fired flares at our drone and the united states called it unsafe and the next question, are we nearing conflict with the kremlin. and with us is lieutenant general jerry boykin.

thank you for being here. there's no question about honor from our forces, but there's question about whether we're going through the right strategy in dealing with russia. what would you do with all of these very aggressive moves on their part? >> yeah, i would do everything that we can possibly do economically. if we want to-- if we want to stop russia, we need to find a way and multiple ways, most likely, to try and get them focused on saving their country and feeding their people and one of the things that we should do is become energy sufficient. we need to start drilling again and i think in many ways deny them of the revenue that they have coming in from oil reserves. david: that's very interesting, by the way, that you mention. i'm old enough to harken back to the reagan administration

when ronald reagan said the best way to keep our country safe is to develop the economy. it gives us a sense of independence. if we need to do more of that for the sake of national defense? >> absolutely, no question about it. until we do something to show not only strength and a willingness to take them on in many arenas, we've got to show them that we are willing to do whatever it takes for us and our allies, to maintain our standards of living, but also to be able to work around anything that china or russia or any of the other nations that are threats, to include north korea, and we need to be able to work around whatever they try to throw on the table at us. david: well, i'm just curious about one thing. one of the strikes against our drones took place in syria. now, i remember a couple of years ago, i think it was 2018 when the wagner group, which is

well-known now because of what they've been doing in ukraine, was doing something in syria and donald trump wasted no time. he sent a strike force in there and killed over 200 wagner troops and russia did not really hit back at all. i mean, it seemed to get the message across. should we take some effort like that? because clearly at least in the air, the russians are in syria again. >> yeah, and that was -- that strike was absolutely spectacular in terms of the fact that they killed 200 of the wagner group people, but at the same time, that not a single civilian was killed and i think they fired like 30 rockets or missiles in there and it was a -- done very well. so anybody that says, oh, we're going to start world war iii if we do something like this, look at what the strike showed us. it showed that we could be very

precise and target the right things and that, as a matter of fact, i think is probably one of the more impressive strikes that i've seen in my 36 years in the military. david: it also said a lot to putin and of course, he did not invade ukraine until trump was out of office. i'm just wondering, what's happening after these two weeks of, i guess, a supposed coup from the wagner group head against putin? can he afford to have his forces divided? i was kind of surprised to hear that he still had forces in syria when he's got everything going on with not only ukraine, but worrying about his own military, whether they had any designs against him. >> yeah, i think that's a real question that he's got to be asking himself. can i go on like this? can i keep any number of troops in that part of the world when the real fight is for him is based in the ukraine.

so, i will tell you that i think that he is -- a lot of what he's doing right now, chasing our drones and other things, and shooting right up on the border of one of our n.a.t.o. allies, i think a lot of that has to do with him trying to regain his credibility. i think that he was so damaged by this insurrection by the wagner group that he is doing anything he can now to not necessarily to try and provoke the united states or any of our allies, but to show his people and the rest of the world that he is still a strong man. he is still in a position of power, which is absolutely not the case. he is not in the position. david: general, quickly because we've got to run, but there's a new sale of cluster bombs from the u.s. and even though the biden administration about a year ago was saying that that would be a violation, would be a war crime, we're selling

these. the u.k. prime minister just reminded, said they're not going to send cluster bombs because, in fact, convention prohibits either their production or use in ukraine. what do you think about the sale of cluster bombs to the ukraine for whether we sell them or give them to the ukraine? >> well, first of all, i think what he's talking about, what the brits are talking about, there's about 100 countries that have signed some kind of treaty that says they will not use cluster bombs, but i tell you, they're weapons of war, they're effective and think about this, the ukrainians are fighting in their own nation and i think it's unlikely that they're going to do anything foolish, but nonetheless, this is war and these are weapons of war and as far as i am concerned, we should give it to them. david: general boykin, always a pleasure to talk to you, sir. appreciate it. >> good to be with you, thank you. david: well, who says bigger is

better? more and more americans are turning to tiny houses as the cost to buy a home soars. forget a cage match. the battle between elon musk and mark zuckerberg could be headed to the courtroom. that's on the docket coming next. tri-zone. in my ozempic® tri-zone, i lowered my a1c, cv risk, and lost some weight. in studies, the majority of people reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as stroke, heart attack, or death in adults also with known heart disease. and you may lose weight. adults lost up to 14 pounds. ozempic® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't share needles or pens, or reuse needles. don't take ozempic® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. gallbladder problems may occur. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin

may increase low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. ask your health care provider about the ozempic® tri-zone. you may pay as little as $25.

>> point, click, sue. elon musk twitter accusing mark zuckerberg's meta for poaching employees for new thread. soaring past 70 million, that's quick. do they have a case? let's ask morgan wright. thank you for being here. obviously, one of the first thing elon musk did when he took over twitter was let a lot of the staff go. >> right. david: i think at one point i heard 90%, i don't know how that's possible, but he let a lot of people go and they were looking for work and zuckerberg's there to pay them. no wonder that he got all of

these employees that had inside information about twitter, right? >> yeah, it's not -- and the i think you've got to be careful of, anytime you leave a company and go to another one, you've got things in your head, intellectual property secrets. if you're ethical you've got to say i can't talk, can't work in that area. we don't know the details of yet behind the scenes, but what's clear 70 million downloads already. it's going to be formidable competitor. elon did get rid of a lot of people, but the fact that twitter is still up and running. there's a lot of bloat in code, a lot of bloat in people that you hire. i think that elon went too far the other way, but this is a battle not won in a cage match. this will eventually for some of the stuff, david, like you mentioned, this is going to end up in court and litigation. david: what sort of secrets is musk concerned about zuck getting? zuck has been in the social media media for a couple of decades now. >> right. david: wouldn't he already know

most of that, most of those things? >> yeah, there are general things you know, categories of things, but specific ways that twitter may surface things for you to look at, algorithms. elon has made known some of the algorithms, but other things that constitute trade secrets, how they get data, export data, analyze it. generally a lot of people analyze data, if you have a unique way to do it developed by trademark, those are trade secrets. i doubt that it's going to go anywhere, the bigger issue, the issue of privacy. what type of information is zuckerberg collecting versus what twitter is collecting. this is almost an apple android battle on privacy, twitter versus thread, 14 different-- if you go to the app store, it's collecting 14 different

things including your credit score. caveat emptor. david: i ended my instagram account, it was getting too much -- it just seemed to be going in the wrong direction, instagram. but i'd have to join it up again and also a thing find fida-verse shows you data within the meta universe. as it's a question of security and ideological divide and some people say that zuckerberg is interfering with free speech. a lot of times if you want to make contact with individuals on threads, you get a warning, it comes up, this person has put out false information, so-called, from certain contributors. so, i mean, you know, are they already getting into the stuff that people went to twitter to avoid? >> you know, i think so, david and i think you hit upon a key

things, too. mark zuckerberg, facebook, twitter -- i mean, instagram, they'll have a way to look at it and curate, it's more of the wild west on twitter. i like to go to twitter because i can see so many different things. i don't want a bunch of moderated content on twitter, i want to select what i'm looking at. i've seen reports of people who have already received three strikes for information they've put out. it's not even been out since what, wednesday, people are already getting three strikes. you're right ideological issue, do you want an open exchange of ideas or it's okay, if you want to be in an area where it's moderated and content taken out, then maybe threads is for you. david: i prefer the marketplace of ideas, always have. morgan wright, thank you for being here. appreciate it. >> thank you, david. david: and democrats are pressuring president biden to overhaul the supreme court after the recent rulings. forget luggage or carry-ones,

one airline is offering the option to rent clothes at their destination so they can pack even lighter. does that make sense? you've probably been putting a lot of purchases on your credit cards. those balances can sneak up fast. even worse, the interest rate on credit card debt has gone up to 22% and for late payments as high as 30%. that's over three times the rate on a newday 100 va home loan pay off those high rate cards and other debt with a lower rate home loan from newday. you can save $500 every month. [music “this little light of mine”] in the world's poorest places, children with cleft conditions live in darkness and shame. they're shunned, outcast, living in pain. you can reach out and change the life of a suffering child right now. a surgery that take as little as forty five minutes and your act of love can change a child's life forever.

please call, scan or go online to give a new smile. thousands of children are waiting.

>> the first amendment protects core political speech and that's exactly what biden was censoring, whether or not people believed the hunter biden laptop story or people were hesitant to wear a mask. that's what biden did, and protecting speech. david: repealing the ruling that restricts government

officials from contacting social media companies. in the meantime, president biden is facing pressure from some democrats to overhaul the supreme court after affirmative action and student loans. and joining me is tom dupree, thank you for being here. before we get to the democrats to pack the court and other things, the social media decision by a lower court, a federal judge, do you think it makes it to the supreme court? could it be as explosive as the other supreme court decisions? >> well, if it does make it to the supreme court, david, i agree it will be as explosive as the other social media decisions we've seen lately. they have a ways to go before they get there. the first stop will be the united states court of appeals for the 5th circuit, which is the appeal court which oversees the trial judge in louisiana with this ruling. it's more than 100 pages and the judge dew points the evidence that he found that

underlies his corns that the biden administration overstepped bounds to try and police and enforce the content that social media content allowed to be shared and posted. david: the white house wants to stop the injunction from them speaking to social media companies. do you think they'll be successful in doing that before it reaches the supreme court? >> yeah, what they may be successful in doing is getting the injunction or the scope of this injunction modified. it apparently is a broad swath of communications of anyone in the government and social media companies. there are exceptions. if i was the justice department and representing the administration, i would say this order goes too far, it sweeps in a lot of communications that should be allowed and even if you don't get this injunction overturned maybe they'll scale it back in some respects. david: kind after negotiation going on. and tom, let's talk about what happens with the supreme court. the attacks have been coming

out fast and furious from democrats. so far the president has resisted specifically on the issue of packing or expanding the supreme court. he actually spoke to that after one of these decisions was made a couple of weeks ago. let me just roll that tape. >> i think if we start the process of trying to expand the court, we're going to politicize it maybe forever in a way that is not healthy. >> that you can't get back? >> that you can't get back. david: so they're working on the president, these progressives, but it doesn't seem like they're getting any traction in terms of his opposition to packing the court. do you think it will remain that way or might they try to do that, to pack the court? >> i hope that president biden stands firm on this. look, i don't agree with president biden on a whole lot, but he's absolutely right here, that trying to pack the united states supreme court makes absolutely no sense and it's unfortunate and in my view, regrettable, there are a lot of voices prom dominantly on the

left urging fundamental changes, structural changes in the supreme court which is an institution that's served our nation so well for centuries because because they don't like the current outcome of decisions. they don't like the fact that there's a conservative majority on the supreme court that's rendering these decisions which admittedly are controversial, but none of this, in my mind, justifies remaking, reshaping, reworking an institution that's a fundamental part of the government of the united states and served us so well for years. david: doesn't it depend whose ox is getting gored? i'm old enough to remember at least the first few years after roe v. wade came in conservatives calling for restructuring of the supreme court saying it's too liberal. i don't think they went as far as packing the court, but they certainly disliked the fact what they thought were rulings that should be made by congress were being made in the supreme court itself. but so, you do see this on both sides, depending on which issue

you're dealing with, right? >> sure, look, there's definitely an ebb and flow in our nation's history, at a time you have a liberal majority in control on the supreme court and times like now, conservative majority in control. and look, the way you need to change the competition of the supreme court is not by changing the membership or allowing there to be 15 or 21 justices on the court. the way you change the membership is to win presidential elections. that's why we have a conservative majority now. president trump won the election and he filled those seats on the supreme court and if the democrats want to change that, not to rejigger the supreme court, it's to win the election for the supreme court justices. david: there are issues plaguing both of the leading contenders going into the 2024 elections. do those cancel each other. >> it looks like the legal issues on president trump's

side seems to be helping, more than anticipated. the conventional wisdom, he's getting indicted, that's going to harm the polls, and that's not. and president biden is hoping, hoping, that the legal issues surrounding hunter biden have been put to bed. david: david weiss says the investigation is still open, rumors to the contrary notwithstanding. thank you, tom, appreciate it. >> thank you, david. david: and and is this working? pack your clothes before you go rent your clothes in the destination to which you're going. that's coming up. okay going. that's coming up. okay we know you care. make the call. because we care too. ♪ home instead. to us, it's personal.

oh booking.com, ♪ i'm going to somewhere, anywhere. ♪ ♪ a beach house, a treehouse, ♪ ♪ honestly i don't care ♪ find the perfect vacation rental for you booking.com, booking. yeah.

- this is our premium platinum coverage map and this is consumer cellular's map. - i don't see the difference, do you? - well, that one's purple. - [announcer] get the exact same coverage as the nation's leading carrier. starting at $20. consumer cellular. >> inflation has doubled since biden took office and he spent $5 trillion on his watch. so while he's trying to go and sit there and talk about how great biden-omics is, he's hurting american families by the day. david: 2024 presidential candidate nikki haley, talking about it in home state, and a poll says she may be right as nearly 7 in 10 say the economy is in poor shape. haley's out right now talking to voters in hanover, new

hampshire saying how she would do things differently. to andrea hoff in d.c., to talk about the 2024 campaigns. good to see you, alexandria. >> and nikki haley revealed she's met the republican national committee's donation criteria to make it to the debate stage in milwaukee. they must have unique donors in territories she says she's received 150 donors from all 50 states. she's spent a lot of time in the granite state and last month as well. another debate qualifiers, must hold at least 1% in national polls. according to fox news polling, former president trump holds 34 point lead over his closer competitor ron desantis. in iowa he emphasized under the

administration the door was open to increased ethanol sales. that's a big deal because a majority of iowa's crops produce ethanol and because desantis opposed the minimum fuels for ethanol. listen to what he had to say. >> ending the renewable fuel standards was one of his top priorities as a member of congress. he wanted to end it and if he had his way, the entire economy of iowa would absolutely collapse because it would collapse if you did that. >> you see, that's words in iowa. and desantis said this isn't the first instance of donald trump distorting his words and he will be a champion for farmers and use every tool available for the markets. desantis' campaign raised $26 million in the first of his

race, which is over trump's $35 million in three months. david: with us is fox business's charlie gasperino. by the way, vivek ramaswamy is third, and one poll shows him at 10%. he funds his own campaign. and there's movement underneath trump and desantis. >> absolutely. i thought was poll was interesting. didn't get the attention it deserved maybe because of the holiday week. that poll only had him behind desantis by six points and why is that? i think because vivek is everywhere. doing a lot of media interviews and i think the other candidates would be wise to do that and we know that trump, even though he has a love-hate relationship with the media, he does woo the media and i think that desantis needs to do that as well. meanwhile, the president and his biden-omics campaign isn't

going well. a lot of americans believe what they see and what their pocket books tell them. usually it's not tough for a sitting president to raise money for his reelection. in this case, with all the of the strikes against him, is he having trouble raising money right now for reelection? >> you know, it seems like he is. we have to preface that it's early and we're not in total campaign mode. i don't know how hard they're trying now. listen, there's obviously kiss content in the democratic party with joe biden and whether he can survive four years as president. he does not seem mentally fit even now. i mean, that's one of the reasons why he can't sell biden-omics. if you look at the polling, people give him him horrible grades on the economy. the other thing is that

biden-omics, the economy is in a weird state, david. there's not a lot to work with. when you have 4% inflation you can have 3% unemployment which is very low, but that eats into wages so people are looking at the fact that they are taking home maybe less money, it's hard to fill up their car with gas, can't go out to dinner because even if you go to the diner, it costs a lot of money these days and you put that together and biden-omics doesn't add up much. by the way, i know, pretty sure that media matters will attack me and run numbers on what i'm saying here, but you know, the people out there are believing this. this is in the polling. you can't get around it. it's really, it's really pathetic and other is the other thing. david: quickly because i want bob back in here. go ahead. >> one more point. this is where it gets really weird, if the fed keeps raising interest rates, he's going to have to own maybe recession in a couple of years. david: that still may happen although rumors it was coming

seemed to be wrong so far. bob, just fishing for any good news for the president on the economic front. i did find or at least in the polling that people dislike his economic policies less. he did have 65% against specifically his economic policies. that's improved a little bit. now only, only 60% of people. so, is there any progress he's making on this biden-omics thing? >> no, but he's got to make some this summer, as charlie was saying. there are some good indicators inflation is going down, the stock market is not bad right now. unemployment is low, however, the mood of the country is sour and unless joe biden turns that around in the next i'd say six months, i think he's going to have a tough time winning a second term. this biden-omics could be a punch line or a good complain slogan. we won't know for another year or so. david: where is it coming from inside the white house. who is behind the messaging as far as biden-omics is

concerned? >> it's a joint effort. i think that biden has moved with white house officials, including jeff steins, the white house chief of staff going to the middle. he did go to the border after the house flipped to the republicans, that was not a coincidence and signed a d.c. crime bill. but signs that they know this is a tough race to win. david: charlie, what are your folks in the financial community tell you about whether or not we're going to have recession before? if we have a recession in the election year, that's got to hurt biden even more, right? >> yeah, and i said two years, i mean next year is the election year and that's when the recession could come. here is what they're telling me. inflation is still sticky. that means that we had larry fink on fox business you know, he's a democrat as you know, he runs blackrock. i believe four more rate hikes are in order. david: that makes us closer to recession, possibly. >> you know, there's a lot of -- there's a lot of stuff out

there. people -- there's so much money sloshing around in the economy because of all they spent post covid, during covid and post-covid you have sticky inflation. the only way to get that, if you don't like do free market sort of maneuvers is essentially to slow down the economy and that's the only tool that the fed has right now. david: we've got to leave it at that. charlie, bob, good to see you both. are you tired of paying for baggage fees? one airline is offering to rent clothes to passengers so all they have to do is take a toothbrush. and americans are sizing down, the big business of tiny homes after the break. ♪ lflex grid draws away heat, relieves pressure, and instantly adapts. sleep better, live purple. save up to $800 off

mattress sets during purple's july 4th sale. visit purple.com or a store near you. hi, i'm sharon, and i lost 52 pounds on golo. on other diets, i could barely lose 10-15 pounds. thanks to golo, i've lost 27% of my body weight, and it was easy. (soft music) with new scope squeez mouthwash concentrate, just add water. squeez to control the strength of your mouthwash. and find a zone all your own. ♪ ♪ scope squeez. every day, more dog people are deciding it's time for a fresh approach to pet food. developed with vets. made from real meat and veggies. portioned for your dog. and delivered right to your door.

it's smarter, healthier pet food.

>> so as home prices stay high and interest rates continue to rise, first time buyers are

turning to tiny homes. fox business's jeff flock getting an inside look at the growing trend for us. jeff. >> i come to you from what's turned into a craze in this country, that is tiny houses. take a look at this one, it's actually not so tiny, it doesn't feel tiny anyway. look at the picture window. these things have taken off in popularity and they've gotten fancier and fancier and this man that was on the cutting edge of it, david. you've been in the business of building structures for a long time long before they were cool. >> way before they're cool. >> now they've gotten cooler in some ways and people say they want this. >> yeah, for a number of reasons. the design, as you can see, is amazing. people like that, but even unique stays have become a thing in the short-term renter space and people like unique. that's pretty cool. >> yeah, the picture window is one of the things and this has

all the things a typical home would have, whether it's a television, you know, nice flooring, we're in the kitchen here. you don't have to go far to go into the bedroom. this simplifies people's life in a way that maybe a lot of people are seeking. >> yeah, and people love it. you know, we mentioned, we talked earlier about affordable housing and how it's a problem in this country and this is solving a problem in our country. >> yeah, i'm looking out the window or we were looking out the window and thomas, can you go back out the window. you build all sorts of these, some more modern, some more r rustic, great demand. we started with rustic and listened to customers needs and desires and evolved into something more modern. we listen today what customers wanted and this is it. >> i want to leave you with a couple of facts. this industry has a lot of room to run, four billion dollars worth of growth they think in the industry over the next years. the prices, somebody wants to

know what this would cost, a little more expensive than the average tiny home because of the size of it, but still pretty affordable, what's in? >> yeah, so this modern one with lots of glass, you're talking 100 to $110,000. >> the smaller homes, 30, 60,000. >> could be 30 to 60,000, very affordable. >> you can simplify your life, too, that might be positive. you can't have too much stuff in a place that's kind of small. i wish i could listen to my own advice. back to you. david: all right. jeff. speaking of simplifying your life. if you're tired of baggage tease when you fly, don't pack your clothes for the flight. instead, rent your clothes for when you arrive. the airline that's offering that coming up next. ♪ (vo) this is sadie, she's on verizon. the network she can count on. and now she has myplan, the game-changing new plan

that lets her get exactly what she wants and save on every perk. sadie is moving to the big city and making moves on her plan, too. apple one, on. now she's got plenty of entertainment for the whole ride. finally there! hot spot, on. and she's fully connected before her internet is even installed. (sadie) hi, mom! (mom) how's the apartment? (vo) introducing myplan. get exactly what you want, only pay for what you need. act now and get it for $25 when you bring your phones. it's your verizon.

>> well, forget about packing light. how about not packing at all. japan airlines new clothing rental program, with that you have travelers will soon have the option to rent clothes where they're going instead of having to pack their clothes at all. but will this fly with passengers? new york post columnist, ricky is with us and casey mcdonald. casey, what do you have about all this have. >> thank you for having me, n-o spells no. absolutely not. the clothes aren't the problem, the other stuff is the problem and here is something, here is an argument against that. you get to the destination and play for this beautiful trip and awesome hotel oh, my gosh, i forget this, the baby

formula, and you waste the time getting the toiletries. what if the clothes don't fit, then you're going out to buy new clothes. david: also, what if they don't smell good or you feel creepy. >> i was looking at photos from the airline, they were wrinklier than i would hope to be. david: i'm an old-fashioned guy, maybe isn't it wrinkly right now? or not up-to-date. >> i'm too particular with my wardrobe. david: two no's. and i'm wondering if it's unique to japan, maybe more accustomed to people being cleaner than we are here and they don't feel as creeped out by this as we do. >> we're also like the super size me countries so we need more is more is more is more. we need pics for the gram, and

it's like the tiny houses, i don't know if it's going to fly for us. david: another thing i don't know if it's going to fly. a few countries, indonesia is one of them, they'll cater for weddings. what do you think so of that? >> you know, $2 a pop per head so it's pretty economical, that's another thing, i'm surprised it's not america, it's indonesia. it might fly here, but probably not for my wedding. i'll be passing on that. david: what do you think, casey? kacie. >> i think i would go for chipotle. david: it's done in the white house, we had donald trump cater mcdonald for more than one meeting. they were mostly athletes used to eating mcdonald's food, it wasn't look a wedding where you have to satisfy a lot of different tastes, but that is

the great thing. look at all of those mcdonald's and i was told by somebody who was there, that every one of those burgers was gone at the end of the day. >> i believe it, but i hear they're only offering chicken in this package so get ready for the mcnuggets. david: we want to look for ways to cut corners, don't we, kacie? >> we do and make sure that the chicken is chicken 100%. maybe go to the local grocery store and make a big salad and a big buffet or a pot luck wedding there you go. david: not bad. is there anything you've seen from overseas in the new trends that are going to fly in the united states. i think they're probably both passes although they're doing to do the economic climate change issue with the luggage packing. david: one size doesn't fit all. it may fly elsewhere, but doesn't necessarily here. ladies, thank you for coming in

for the weekend and a special thanks to everybody out there at home for watching. thank you so much. neil is going to be back here to put some order into the show next week, but until then, stick with fox for the very latest breaking news. fox news live in washington d.c. with aishah hasnie and griff jenkins is coming up next. the grocery store and the gas station alone are taking a big chunk out of our paychecks. fortunately, you've earned the valuable va home loan benefit. the newday100 va loan lets you borrow up to 100% of your home's value, not just 80%. and with home values near record highs, that could mean a lot of money. let newday turn your home's equity into cash.

ais aishah:. aishah: >> president biden dodging questions on the illicit drugs found in the white house on sunday, as congressional leaders are now calling on the secret service to provide them with an update on their investigation into how in the world cocaine got into the executive mansion. welcome to fox news live, i'm aishah hasnie, good to see you, griff. a great weekend. griff: welcome back in new york. and it