pulled over by the coast guard from trying to escape pirates in the gulf. dylan, good luck and if i am ever in your neck of the woods, let's go for a spin. sound good? >> sounds great. don't forget if you are too busy to go fishing you are just too busy. >> all right, captain. don't forget to dvr the show and always remember i am waters and this is my world. good evening welcome to "fox news tonight". i am piers morgan. they let me back. it's the million-dollar question. the treacherous puzzler that is the biggest brains and politics with public figures around the world trembling and terrified. it's not what will stop inflation or the peace in ukraine. it is this. what is a woman? spoiler alert. it is an an adult human female. that's been the case for thousands of years. from the dawn of civilization,

but now people aren't so sure. they are being told a woman is pretty much anyone who feels like they are a woman. they put their hand up and go i am a woman. there is an increasingly weird hysterical campaign to make you believe the sky is green and the grass is blue and anyone who disagrees is instantly a bigot. ironically, it is the leading feminists. people like u.s. women's soccer superstar megan rapinoe. she says excluding trans athletes from women's sports is taking away people for humanity. really? megan rapinoe would welcome a transgender woman replacing a biological female on the u.s. national team. conveniently she said that just as she is retired. it wouldn't be her place that would be taken. we already know what result of rapinoe's demands would look like. a few years ago the women's team played fc dallas under 15 boys team. the boys won 5-2. the women's team is probably the

best it has ever played the game. there is the evidence. it's just a biological fact. the boys were more physically superior. that doesn't denigrate from what the women did. it's just a statement of the bleeding obvious. thankfully there are other female athletes speaking out against this madness. martina navratilova reacted to the recent comments with the perfect one worded tweet which brought sensibility to it. yikes. that is how i feel. this ideology isn't limited to athletes. supreme court justice ketanji brown jackson is said what is a woman triggering a confirmation hearings. >> can you provide a definition for the word woman? >> can i provide a definition? >> yeah. >> i can't. >> you can't? >> not in this context. i am not a biologist. >> the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can't give me a definition?

>> you are appointed to the supreme court of the united states as a woman. you don't know what a woman is? i am not a baker, but i can identify a fruitcake. what's interesting about this particular mind virus as elon musk would put it it is become a global pandemic. in my country our politicians believe women, clearly according to them, are innocent. >> can a woman have a penis? >> they can't. >> i have made it really clear that the vast majority of people will have the same gender as the biological sex but a small number won't. >> women cannot have a penis? >> clearly. >> quite clearly. really? again? i can't believe any of this really needs to be explained especially to political leaders. prime minister was reduced to rubble on the very same simple question. >> to be honest it comes

slightly out of left field for me. biology, sex, gender, people define themselves. people define their own genders. the gender identity people identify gender identity for themselves. >> he's the prime minister of a country. now i interviewed singer macy gray on my show uncensored last year. she answered completely honestly about what a woman is. she said this. >> if i asked you what a woman is, what would you say? >> i would say a human being with moves. i guess you start there. >> the dictionary is straightforward. >> and ava china. >> i will say this and everybody will hate me. but as a woman just because you change your parts doesn't make you a woman. >> that was her honest opinion and i suspect most women share

that opinion. a sign of the times macy gray had such a furious backlash to go on the today show on nbc to apologize days later. >> being a woman is alive. it is something i am very proud of. it is very precious to me. i think that if you in your heart feel that that is who you are that is what you are regardless of what anybody says or thinks. >> that is not what she said the first time. that is not what she meant. that is cancel culture for you. you submit to the mob or you be condemned. you apologize for saying what you actually believe. that's it. you are done. one woman who wasn't afraid to speak the truth is roseanne barr. she gave me this hilarious answer when i put the question to her yesterday. listen, roseanne barr me ask you the most difficult question in the world apparently. what is a woman? >> how much do i weigh? >> no, what is a woman?

>> a woman is me. a woman is somebody who's breasts hang down to her stomach and who has a prolapsed uterus from giving birth to five ungrateful little link who have never had to work for a thing in there [ bleep ] lives. that is what a woman is. >> have you ever heard a more fabulous description or definition of a woman than that from roseanne barr? she did going to say her kids found it funny. they have a sense of humor. i know comedy is banned as well in this ridiculous world we have to endure. you are allowed to have a laugh even with your mom. roseanne barr's opinion is closer to what most adult humans have both are on the subject. watching the post- poll earlier this year found 50% of americans believe gender is based on the sex assigned at birth. even the majority of millennials and young people agree. so why is the question, what is

a woman, so impossible to answer? chris cristi is the former governor of new jersey and running for president as a republican. he joins me. you know the question is coming your way. >> i have absolutely no idea. let me tell you something. that was the biggest wind up to that question i have ever seen in my life. look, i have always looked at this traditionally. i am a traditionalist. a woman is someone who is born with that biological gender at birth. i recognize now there are folks who feel differently about that. they are free to feel differently about it eric i don't. to me, a woman is someone who is born a biological woman and that is the definition. i confronted the first edge of this when i was governor because they sent me a bill that would allow me to change their gender on their birth certificate. i vetoed it. >> you have been able to argue

the most progressive of the republican candidates this time on this issue. you signed two bills that matched california's bathroom policy for transgender youth and directed the new jersey department of education to give guidance on other issues related to trans students like preferred names and pronouns. legislation allowed transgender use to participate in sports that match the gender identity rather then biological sex. >> that last part did not happen when i was governor. that happens when phil murphy was governor. >> what is your view on that issue? should transgender be allowed to compete against? >> biological males should not compete against biological females. done. >> what about the issue of gender reaffirm? this is a hot potato. this is where people want to know if you were the president of the united states how would you feel about kids from 10 to 14? you think that parents should be involved and it should be an

issue for states and so on. is that a sensible way to go given all the abuse in this area? >> i think it is. we are having a big argument in our country about parents being excluded from educational choices for their kids. we as a republican party conservative say parents should decide the children's educational choices. i don't think the government has any business getting between a parent and their child. in any one of these instances. we should put parents in charge of these decisions when someone does not at the age of majority. i always thought that is what conservatives were about. >> the most conservatives are not about that anymore. >> they are not conservative. >> maybe you are not? >> no. that is like saying that now a biological woman isn't a woman by a yardstick. don't use the modern yardstick one way and want to change it a different way. it is very clear to me that conservatives don't want big

government in their lives. they don't want big government interfering in their lives especially in their personal lives. they don't want the government saying what books their children can read. they don't want the government saying what their education should be. they want the parents in the middle of that. geewhiz, shouldn't they be in the middle of making those decisions? >> they have the responsibility to protect children. what we have seen in the last few years is a creeping erosion of kids rights where many of them are being frankly mutilated. a lot of people are looking to politicians to take the lead and say enough of this. enough of these clinics all around america. we had them in the uk. frankly, child abuse and mutilation has been going on. it is incumbent on politicians like you that want to be president to say enough of this. we will protect our kids. >> it is incumbent upon politicians to deal with other issues other than this and let parents deal with the issues. my few of it is when we have war and eastern europe, when we have

inflation that is bankrupting people in this country, when we have educational standards dropping to the basement, a border we cannot protect, immigration system we can't fix. then i don't believe that is what we should be doing. let the government due the things they are supposed to be doing first before they start substituting for a parents judgment. parents decide where their kids go to school. we should have educational freedom. parents should decide these issues, these very difficult sexual, emotional issues with their children. they shouldn't dish off that responsibility to the government. >> you want to be president. >> that is what i have heard. >> to do that you have to knock out donald trump. you have come out of the traps flying and punching and give credit to you because somebody has to do that otherwise they will not win the nomination from him. it's a double-edged sword because you run the risk of alienating the mega base that he has which seems pretty rocksolid whatever mode is thrown at him. how will you get around that and get the nomination? how will you persuade those people who are full on for

donald trump that you are not and tied them too as you pound him into submission? >> my comments are not about them. they are directly about him. i am telling the truth. the things i have said, not even donald trump denies they are true. let's look at this as an example. what member of donald trump's senior staff or senior cabinet members would work for him again? not one of his secretaries of state, not one of the secretaries of defense, neither attorney general, not any of his chiefs of staff, not any of the white house counsel. what does that tell you about what it is like to work for this man? >> you wanted to work for him? you wanted to be attorney general. >> i got offered secretary of labor, secretary of homeland security, white house chief of staff and i turned them all down. >> but you did support him until january 6? >> not january 6. people get this wrong. election night 2020 when he stood up in the east room of the

white house behind the seal of the president and said the election was stolen. not even all the votes had been counted. there is no evidence to this day that the election was stolen. that's when i abandoned him. by the way, he abandoned me and others like me who supported him. i was the first one on board in 2016. i chaired his opioid transition. i prepped for the debates in '16 and '20. i did everything to support donald trump and make him the best president he could be but he disappointed me and let me down. he said he had $6 trillion to the national debt. he did not build the wall in mexico. he built 47 miles of wall. we paid for every nickel of it. we did not get a peso from mexico. when you look at the ways he failed us, not even talking about his personal conduct. as a president how he failed us, he abandoned me. >> let's assume you are right about that hypothetically. >> what did i just say that was

wrong? >> here is my question. if that is the case, why is he still so far ahead in the polling? why are you so far behind? why is your message if you are right getting so little traction? >> i have been in the campaign for five weeks. for five weeks i have gone from nowhere to third place in new hampshire only four points behind ron desantis in five weeks. i think i am doing okay. i will continue to be patient and persistent and you know me. i will say it exactly the way i feel and will say it from the heart and gut. you know what voters deserve more than anything else? two things. they deserve the truth which they don't get from donald trump and they deserve results on the issues they care about like immigration and the national debt and educational freedom. on educational freedom he didn't do one thing to make it easier. >> what does that say about america that we could end up if you are unsuccessful in the

nomination and donald trump potentially under multiple indictments, potentially four different criminal situations that he is indicted on, possibly getting convicted and being in a prison cell. you have joe biden who many people think will barely last six months let alone six more years. what does it say about the state of american politics? >> if that is where we end up it's a sad state of american politics to have two candidates combined at 160 years old, to lead the strongest, freest, richest, most powerful country in the world. that is why i am in the race. i want to bring the truth to light, to our voters on those issues. they deserve the truth, they want the truth. they deserve it. he doesn't give it to them. >> you are good at ruffling feathers. you don't care whether people like you necessarily. it's more about you being transparent in what you believe. i remember when i interviewed you many years ago, 12 years

ago, on another network which we won't mention. and never recovered from me leaving. you talked about your mother who died a few years before. your mother told you not to worry too much about being loved. focus on being respected. if you are respected you can find love down the road and people will love you for it. that's a great quote. do you still subscribe to that? >> 100% i still subscribe to that theory. i will not pander to people. i will not go to different audiences and give different messages depending on who is sitting in those chairs. i will continue to be who i am. guess what? at this time, eight years ago donald trump was at 4% and jeb bush was at 20%. we don't know what will happen here. in 2007 barack obama was 34 points behind hillary clinton at this point. how about we have the campaign. >> one key issue. donald trump says he will fix the ukraine wore in 24 hours.

>> he will bend over like he always does to vladimir putin and hand him ukraine. he thinks he is a terrific person and an honest guy. this guy who is an authoritarian dictator who has invaded a neighbor with artillery and killing innocent people and taking their land by force. this is a guy donald trump calls a terrific person. >> let me flip the argument. i agree with you broadly about ukraine. under donald trump's for your presidency america never went to war. none of these dictators weather was boudin or kim jong-un hold any stunts while he was president as he keeps saying. they didn't. was there a bit of method to trump's mendis in the way he dealt with these people and people thought he was crazy but actually maybe the unpredictability of trump kept people like vladimir putin in their boxes? >> i don't think by calling kim jong-un a great guy he stopped them from continuing to develop missile technology but now is

allows the missiles to reach the united states. that happened on donald trump's watch. he doesn't answer for that either. he doesn't answer for holding back military aid from ukraine to try to get dirt on joe biden. all those things are not things that send confidence to world leaders or fear in the hearts of desperate. these are the things i want to debate on the stage with him. i don't know if he will turn out. go to chris cristi.com and donate a dollar and make sure i am on the stage. >> governor, great to see you after all these years. you have weathered well. >> you have weathered well yourself young men. >> you will not be identifying as a woman if you get to the president? >> there is nobody that looks less like a woman then me. >> governor, great to see you. the first debate is weeks away. kellyanne conway joins us to assess the race and may be what she has just heard from chris christie. that is next.

i was told my small business wouldn't qualify for an erc tax refund. you should get a second opinion from innovation refunds at no upfront cost. sometimes you need a second opinion. all these walls gotta go! ah ah ah! i'd love a second opinion. take the first step to see if your small business qualifies.

(swords clashing) -had enough? -no... arthritis. here. aspercreme arthritis. full prescription-strength? reduces inflammation? thank the gods. don't thank them too soon. kick pain in the aspercreme.

welcome back to "fox news tonight". like it or not donald trump is still the republican front runner according to recent

polls. he has a 30-point lead over rivals. those are the candidates that stand a chance against him. kellyanne conway former trump campaigner. lovely to see you. you define as a woman i take it? >> for sure. >> let's talk about the big picture in the race. interesting strategy. vivek ramaswamy who i interviewed yesterday. he doesn't want to engage in taking him on at the moment. chris christie has come out swinging as you expect them to. very different strategy. it all the others, who do you see who is potentially best equipped to get to trump's base and engage with them? >> trump is a juggernaut. you hit on a very important word. you said trump's base. i would say 74 million people in 2020 is a very large piece of the adult electorate. very few people including the candidates now running against donald trump in the primary have spent enough time studying and

understanding what motivated those voters. is easy for people in the mainstream media to denigrate them and insult them. they are occult. he is a fearless leader. they are a base and they don't know any better. they know their lives were better under a more robust economy and energy independence. crime was down in the border was more secure and so on and so forth. this is what people will tell you. i think the way to challenge president trump is to make the debate stage and then be very specific in the questions you want him to hold and account for. for the same questions that we get on twitter every day from other stations or from these major newspapers that have been on his case trying to get the president and not get the story for eight plus years now is not going to amount to enough. we already hear all the criticisms. we will not be unique. there is a third way of trying to take out president trump, but not enough people did it. it was to not run at all. that is what someone like chris sununu did. the more people who run the more competition, the better for

donald trump took the more competition the worse for joe biden. trump loves competition. i think he should show up to the debate. i know why he wouldn't because he is ahead. why stay at home and watch them all talk about you? >> donald trump is many things. and all the time i have known him i've never known him to duck a challenge. if you are watching, donald, come on. >> he is being a front hundred. >> get on the stage and show us what you are made of if you want to be president again. face the debate music. you know you want to. >> i think he won't decide for the last 48 hours. >> he is good at it. >> remember what he did at the convention in 2016? ted cruz was speaking and had come in second. he was lukewarm with trump at the convention. just as ted cruz was getting to the chris endo in walks trump with his family in the spotlight goes there. >> he remains the biggest star. but he has to turn up.

kellyanne conway good to see you. >> thank you. donald trump has a magnetic hold on the populace imagination. he's a global celebration. some liberals were pretty unhappy about this. white stripes lead singer jack white whitehead an absolute meltdown on instagram attacking mel gibson, guy fieri as disgusting for meeting with it. that piece of [ bleep ] donald trump. this was a predictable response because if there is one thing i know about the be kind woke liberal brigade it is there never kind. if it involves trump they seem to lose their minds completely. sure enough this guy jack white lost his mind. what do you make of it? >> first of all i don't think anybody should take political or social advice from somebody who decides to die his hair blue and hasn't had a good song in about

20 years. we will start with that. the other part of this that i think is fascinating is that he talks about normalizing trump. when people show with this, this is one of the trump superpowers. they say things about him that expose so much more about themselves in the process. normalizing a former and possible future president, how could anything be more normal than that? if we were living in the america many of us thought we were before the left turn it into communist and lost their minds, people think this guy is a former president and we show respect. you should so respect to all former presidents. that would be an understanding we all have. the derangement syndrome has never gone away. we are seeing it once again. they would like us to live in a society where everything is so politicized that everybody is as miserable as they are all the time. this guy should focus on riding songs instead of crying like a little baby. >> funny you mention av. joe rogan was one of the people

there and he recently called donald trump a big man baby. he has been pretty critical of him. he never had him on his much lauded podcast. when donald trump saw joe rogan he went over and they shook hands and they were very civil to each other. that to me, if i saw donald trump despite having been critical of him in the last year or so, he would be equally warm and welcoming and would shake my hand. that is my problem with the woke crowd. they are incapable of doing that. they are incapable of having a good old tear up as we would say in england and have a pint in the pub. they don't seem to have that vow. >> absolutely. this is supposed to be a fun event for everybody in attendance. i think trump going on rogan's show would be phenomenal. i would love it if joe rogan would have him on. some other candidates would be fascinating. when you see this you have to remember we are the ones on the right who want people to be able to enjoy a saturday night out.

the blue haired learn attacks on the left are the ones that insist on screaming and shrieking and saying we are not being normal. >> great to see you. honduras is getting rich off of san francisco's decline. stay tuned for more of that.

remember the things you loved... ...before asthma got in the way? fasenra is an add-on treatment for asthma driven by eosinophils. it's designed to target and remove them and helps prevent asthma attacks. fasenra is not for sudden breathing problems or other eosinophilic conditions. allergic reactions may occur. don't stop your asthma treatments without talking with your doctor. tell your doctor if your asthma worsens. headache and sore throat may occur. tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection.

get back to better breathing. ask your doctor about fasenra. welcome back to "fox news tonight". san francisco's anna curry has caused residents to flee the city. gangs and drug dealers will make a fortune off the chaos. according to the san francisco chronicle the open air drug markets have been taken over by honduran drug dealers for the fentanyl trade which has fueled a housing boom in honduras. drug dealers and money to build enormous mansions. the author of san francisco why progressives roman cities joins me now. what the hell is going on in san francisco?

the report in the san francisco chronicle, the more i read it, the more shocking it got. >> it will be with you. it is shocking. it's important for people to remember that for years radical progressives in san francisco have been saying that the drug dealers are victims of human trafficking. we always knew that was a live. but finally things have gotten so bad that the local newspaper, which supports the victimhood ideology which created the problem in the first place, finally went to honduras and saw the huge houses that the drug dealers are building. it's important to remember that these guys are the 10 from psychopathy and sadism. they use machetes to enforce violence. they are selling drugs to very mentally ill people including people with schizophrenia who are wasting away on the streets. often the limbs are riding. these are bad guys. they are abusing a sanctuary law that was set up for refugees or victims of the wars. you can see now finally the

truth is getting out. it is incumbent upon governor gavin newsom because he is the one that created the problem in the first place to finally send in the national guard and the state highway patrol and shut down the open air drug markets. >> what was startling was the amount of money that some of them are raking in. hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars. how many people seam to be engaged in this drug trade, which is financing apparently vast homes back in honduras. when you put it altogether it was a pretty startling picture of a city out of control and a whole system being deployed by the drug cartels to really create huge amounts of money, build huge homes. no one seems to be stopping it. >> that's right. you saw in the story that some of these drug dealers are making $350,000 a year. the money is all going back to honduras. i think it is really important to understand that what

underlies this policy is the racist idea that every person of color is a victim. every immigrant is a victim. everybody who breaks the law to come into the united states is a victim. and two victims these radical progressive leaders believe everything should be given and nothing required. that's why we have roving dangerous violent drug gangs that are literally killing people by selling fentanyl, drug overdose deaths are continuing to rise in san francisco. the mayor refuses to do what she needs to do to crack down and take action. the governor still thinks he will be president. he is behaving as if he would run for president even though it's absolute anarchy and mayhem and downtown san francisco. he's got to sort it out. thank you very much. crime is out of control in the nation's capitol washington, d.c. just last week and afghan lift driver was shot and killed by four teenagers. the driver served as a translator for american forces in afghanistan and managed to flee the taliban. but he couldn't survive the increasing crimes plaguing

american cities. the chairman of the dc city council staggeringly admitting that yesterday criminals get away with murder. his words. in the city. >> most robberies are not solved half of homicides are not solved very quickly. you can get away with murder in the city. increasing the case closure rate has the quickest deterrent effect. >> john kennedy is a u.s. senator from louisiana and joins me now. senator kennedy, quite startling to hear a city council chief just brazenly admitting you can get away with murder. >> look, it is hard not to notice. i live here for a time. there are now streets in washington, d.c. that look like they are out of a scene from mad max. it wasn't always that way. what happened? it is not quantum physics. three years ago dc lawmakers

decided that cops were a bigger problem than criminals. so they defunded the police. cut them $15 million. the dc lawmakers said we want justice. well, don't we all? here's a newsflash. without order, there can be no justice. newsflash number two. unless you have a history of disappointing your parents, you know or should know that there are some people in this world, i don't know why, but they are not sick. they are not mixed up. they are not confused. it is not that their mother or father did not love them enough. they are just antisocial. and by that i mean they hurt other people. and they take other peoples stuff. we have to separate them from society. hugging them and giving them hot cocoa is not going to work.

that's why we need cops. and the final point i would make, look, we have bad cops. i wish we didn't. i wish we lived in la la land or on big rock candy mountain where hands lay softball. we have some bad cops, but we are trying to do better. in the meantime 99% of the cops are not bad people and they will leave you alone unless you do illegal stuff. and i may be wrong, but i think it's highly unlikely. >> you can't be wrong because you have a city council chief who admits you can get away with murder in dc. that's his words. i think we should try and move collectively to a situation where you can't get away with murder in dc. i suspect the key way to do that is to empower the police to stop people getting away with murder. great to see you senator kennedy. liberals across the country

expense parenting experimenting with reparations policies and it's not going that well. more on that, next.

i was told my small business wouldn't qualify for an erc tax refund. you should get a second opinion from innovation refunds at no upfront cost. sometimes you need a second opinion. [coughs] good to go. yeah, i think i'll get a second opinion. all these walls gotta go! ah ah ah! i'd love a second opinion. no. i'm going to get a second opinion.

with innovation refunds, there's no upfront cost to find out. so why not check like i did for my small business? take the first step to see if your small business qualifies for the erc.

tonight. california is hell bent on race-based policies. it would require judges to consider race when sentencing convicted felons. the city of evanston, illinois is joining the charge. the chicago suburb has paid 14 black residents reparations of $25,000. it will reach 140 by the end of the year for a test run for the whole country. a fellow at the hoover institution joins us now to put things in some perspective. victor, what do you make of this? >> it is theater of the absurd. it is sort of performance art insanity. the state is $32 billion in debt. annual deficit. it's got the highest income taxes. it's got the highest gasoline taxes. it's got some of the

highest sales taxes in the country. it's a $32 billion annual deficit. 400,000 people have left the state in the last 18 months. 27% of the state residents weren't even born in the united states. i could go on. one third of all the poverty people on public assistance live in california. 21% live below the poverty line. it's a medieval state. the idea that it has the wherewithal to give 3.4% of the population these fantastic amounts of money that it doesn't have is absurd. everybody knows its absurd. >> putting aside the financial aspect of this, what about the actual significance of the gesture? does it really do anything to repair damage done to race relations historically? >> well, it won't do anything because we know what the problem is and for half of the african-american population that haven't achieved parity.

it is broken families. it's absent fathers. it is poor schools in the inner-city. the medicine is considered by the people for the reparation is worse than the mala day. they know the problem, but yet they are incapable of identifying because they would feel it would be self increments or he or they are not subject to the consequences of the own ideology. it is blame, blame, blame. it will not solve anything. we know what the problem is. we know what the solution is. but we are utterly incapable of adapting it. california as you know is a free state or kid never had slavery. it's a multiracial state. this tribalism where each group lodges complaints historically against the majority population, the white population is not the majority anymore. it's a minority as well. they have run out of victimizers and there are too many victims is what i am saying.

>> on this specific issue and this bill going through would mandate judges to consider race when doling out prison sentences. how can that be a smart idea? >> well, it's not. it's unconstitutional and will be thrown out. it's only going to antagonize. california is a cauldron. it is yugoslavia in the making. we have so many tribal interests that are in competition. until we get back to a melting pot rather than a salad bowl we will go the way of rwanda eventually or the balkans. everybody knows it. we are incapable, impotent of adopting the solutions we know would work. the state is a model of state governance. it was a golden state until about 1990. it was a wonderful place to live. it has been committing slow-motion suicide as you had in an earlier segment. it's a perfect storm of

insanity. 2 i've got a house in la and i have really noticed a massive escalation in violence, and shootings in beverly hills which never used to happen. the stuff i have noticed incrementally increasing. and also a fear factor increasing among residents, many of whom have just left altogether because they didn't want to live under that condition anymore. it is very tangible when you go there as i do quite often. you feel it. >> i don't think it will change until the liberal majority who voted in these policies find out that they can't escape them anymore. they felt that the wealth or security would shield them from the consequences of their own pernicious ideology. but now they are finding if you live in malibu or beverly hills you are not protected. it is so prevalent. i think once they start to suffer what other people have from their ideology they will start to wake up and change.

otherwise the state will implode. >> i completely agree. thank you very much. i appreciate it. next a really with crop tops for men. the new york times claims that the gender bending fashion is all the rage. apparently all the guys are racing to do it. spoiler alert. we are not. more on that, next.

test.

hi, i'm jill and i've lost 56 pounds on golo. hi, i'm barry and i've lost 42 pounds. jill and i are a team. if she tells me to do something, i usually jump on board. golo was doable, it's realistic, and it's something we can do the rest of our lives.

(vo) in three seconds, this couple will share a perfect moment. (woman) is that? oh wow! but we got to sell our houses! (vo) don't worry. sell and buy in one move when you start with opendoor. (woman) yes! (vo) close in a matter of days. start with an all cash offer at opendoor dot com test.

ahhh! icy hot pro starts working instantly. with two max-strength pain relievers, so you can rise from pain like a pro. icy hot pro. tonight. temperatures are rising and so are men's hemlines according to the new york times. a recent tran of men wearing short shorts and crop tops. a piece of the tran was rightly slammed online. coanchor of the bottom line joins us now. welcome. lovely to see you a proper fashion with a little hint of barbie.

love it. i wouldn't wear these crop tops and many shorts for all the whining in the fort knox. i believe most men i know would be seen in them. to myself on what occasion would a man or should a man where a crop top? you are missing your two front teeth or have a giant border growing out of your neck and need to distract people from said deformities. people would be fixated on your hairy belly button. that is when you wear a crop top. i love the fact that "the new york times" has published the same number of news stories about men in crop tops as it has the four-year-old grandchild that family man joe refuses to acknowledge. it seems right. every time i read a new york times fashion piece the one thing i can guarantee is true is that nothing in it

relates to real people and what they are actually wearing. >> because people who write about fashion and are fashion editors are sadistic snobs get into the job only to drive joy and pleasure from making people embarrassed themselves. that is the sole goal. i don't believe any of these people where these stupid outfits. >> nobody does. if they do they should be taken out and shot at don. can money by you love? a single california native is trying to find out. he is putting a spin on referral bonuses. for $5000 to anyone who sets her up with a husband. 25 people or so have contributed ideas for who could be her husband. is this sensible? >> she is a litigator. when she gets divorced she is going to come back at you for that money and pain and suffering. and she wants a man

27-40, 5'11" or taller with the british sense of humor. loves sports, animals and kids and looks like matthew mcconaughey. you know what she will get for $5000? danny devito. tunic you have to pay more than $5000 for abridges sense of humor. this doesn't come cheap. >> so i have heard. great to see you. >> that is it tonight. i will be back tomorrow unless there is a huge protest to stop me. i will handed over to the great sean hannity. it is baseball. it is not cricket. baseball, not cricket. >> and we agree you would never wear a crop top? >> all right, touché. i will give it to my mate from across the pond. great to see you. welcome to hannity. once again your president joe has thoroughly embarrassed the entire country on the world stage on his latest european adventure. earlier today he had to be led around and told where to stand by fellow world leaders numerous times whil