thanks, guys. let's do text. molly from ohio. your best hour ever. brian from florida. does commander biden have a bank account? if you can look closely you can see the romanian money right in there. that's all for tonight. always remember. this is my world. [applause] >> sean: all right! welcome to "hannah tate." we've got all the normal people in new york in this room. thank you for coming and tonight we are going to get right to our top story. a stunning and shocking turn of events in the hunter biden saga tonight. early this morning a federal judge refused to act as a rubber-stamp for biden's weaponized department of justice and put the brakes on hunter's

sweetheart plea deal, at least for now. the u.s. district judge maryellen noreika is her name question legality of the plea agreement and wanted to know if hunter was under an active investigation for other crimes like feral violations and other financial issues which he was in trouble until it left the statute of limitations run out. as it turns out according to prosecutions, hunter remains a subject of at least one ongoing criminal probe and could be charged with future crimes. apparently hunter's attorneys were under the impression that this deal would grant their client full immunity from any future charges. they believe that the sweetheart deals slap on the wrist deal consisting of two minor distributions would wipe the slate clean. when the judge asked if you have any precedents on this kind of

deal, they could incite a single case. why do i have a hard time believing this very important critical point they came on an agreement on was not fully vetted and agreed to before tonight's court appearance. why do some thing here reek of a major live? there is nobody that's going to convince me that they didn't have a full agreement. they are not going to give any more future charges to hunter biden and it was this judge that's all right through it and called them out on it. the judge allowed them to try and hammer out a final last minute deal but without that provision there was no way that hunter's attorneys would allow him to do that. the judge refused to accept the agreement. hunter pleaded not guilty to the tax and gun charges and are found guilty a bit now hunter conveys real time behind bars like the rest of america unless of course another sweetheart deal is reached. keep in mind according to the

"washington examiner," this is the same judge that sentenced another individual to five years in prison for an illegal possession of a f firearm. the judge ordered hunter biden to actively seek employment and bar them from possessing a firearm prohibiting using alcohol or any other drugs. require them to submit to random drug testing. hunter is not charged with other crimes including not registering for a foreign agent as f.a.r.a. requires. are we to believe that hunter's attorneys didn't know about all of this until today or do they have an understanding with a weaponized and politicized merrick garland department of justice that if you take the sweetheart deal, no more charges will be forthcoming. this does not meet the smell test to me.

this all comes one day after judge maryellen noreika accuse hunter biden's legal team, this was an odd term of events late last night of pretending to be a staffer for republican congressmen and stays in smith on the house ways and means committee on a phone call to try and get a court filing that was put in the case by the ways and means committee, and e down like an amicus brief, removed from the docket. previously submitted this filing asking the judge to consider new evidence against hunter from the two whistle-blowers who recently testified very credibly on capitol hill. chairman smith, chairman go america meant they'll all join us in a minute. but of course, the biden legal team says that this is one big misunderstanding. it really? on such an important deal point we are set believe that? i don't believe it.

just like miss understandings surrounding hunter's sale of his art, his paint by numbers. the white house had promised that hunter's paint by numbers portraits of a crackhead... would not be connected to the administration in any way. they vowed that no one, not hunter, not anyone would know who shelled out the massive amount -- you are cracking me up, not man for the massive amount of money for this amateur art. we now know the identities of two of the buyers including a wealthy donor who president biden, oh, magically recently appointed to a prestigious position in the administration. another biden, another buyer was hunter 'so-called "sugar brother kevin morris who helped hunter pay off some of his back taxes and even bought hunter a brand-new car. and evidently one can get special access to the bidens if the price is right. be sure to check out to hunter

and check in with him that the big guy likes to keep up with appearances. the big question tonight is what will happen to hunter peer but more importantly, what will happen to joe biden as a result of everything we are learning and everything we know. after everything we learned from the irs whistle-blowers including the government's obstruction of witnesses. a lack of interest and censorship of the laptop. tthe stall tactics that allow that statute of limitations to expire on serious tax charges, large large amount of money, how the fbi tipped off hunter about the irs's "unplanned questioning" of him. how can anybody be trusting in the american public? person in the courtroom all day in wilmington, delaware, our very own griff jenkins. what a day you had.

i've got to give you credit. your reporting was phenomenal. >> thank you. >> thank you, sean. it's great to be with you and your great live audience here. bottom line is this is not the day in court that hunter biden and his legal team thought that they were getting. remember, we were led to believe that this was a carefully thought out plea agreement and then we learned that in a matter of hours as it collapsed, it was anything but. there are two important takeaways from today. you address them in your great monologues there and they need to focus in on. judge was not convinced of the constitutionality of this plea agreements. specifically as it was related to the diversion part of it that allowed the prosecution on the felony gun charge and number two, the investigation is ongoing and he could face charges including those of the f.a.r.a. act, the foreign agent

registration act. it was really fascinating, sean coming to sit in the courtroom and covered lots of cases but never witnessed anything like it when we watched it fall apart. the moment we all knew it was going to shambles was when judge maryellen noreika asked the prosecution, is this investigation ongoing? yes, your honor. could he face charges because she was not convinced that the agreement made clear whether or not additional charges could come. she asked about the f.a.r.a. act because the investigation is in on hunter biden's business dealings. chris clark for the defense said, i'm not on board. at that point she said wait a minute, what are we doing here, then? she stepped out and we watched in court in real time the prosecution and defense try to hammer out the deal. ultimately it ended with hunter biden pleading not guilty to two tax misdemeanor charges and had come into court to plead guilty

to in an agreement with the legal theme that they thought was going to be immune from future charges and now we do not know where things stand except for the fact that judge gave both sides roughly 30 days to get back to her to prove and convince her the constitutionality of this plea agreement. so not a good day. and you mentioned, by the way, you are going to have chairman smith of the ways and means community, he filed this amicus brief to ask the court to look into the whistle-blower. the two irs whistle-blower testimony. that of course, was not something that had been coming to light yet. when they crafted this plea agreement that fell apart. they never really got to that because the judge couldn't get her answers to the constitutionality question. really quite something in the moment. we knew it was not going to come back together was when david

weiss, the u.s. attorney that has been leading this year's long investigation was looking at something with his team and said, well, we can't get around that. pointing to some part of it. that is when a member of the defense team came and said, rip it up. we knew at that point it was not going to come together, sean. >> sean: great reporting all day long for the channel. thank you, sir. here with reaction james comer. house judiciary committee chairman jim jordan. house ways and means committee and chairman's jason smith. jim jordan, let me start with you. i smell a rat here and i suspect that the judge did as well. we are to believe that this critically important point, that this deal would ensure that there would be no further prosecution for hunter biden. somehow they have had a misunderstanding at that point.

i am not buying that for one second. >> this is now the fourth time that the doj's story has changed. david weiss said that he had all this authority and said that no, i don't. it limited to my u.s. attorney's district. lindsey graham saying that it something different and now we've had this happen. remember, sean. the compelling thing that has happened the last several weeks is two brave whistle-blowers coming forward for chairman smith releasing their testimony publicly and them coming up in front of mr. cromer's oversight committee and testifying and the credibility was unimpeachable. the story has been consistent. their faqs have not wavered. their testimony has been straightforward and has been validated by an fbi agent who we have interviewed. what i really want to do come with the judiciary wants to do is get into who are those people at this now famous october 7th 2022 meeting where david weiss said that he had been inhabiting authority to bring the charges

wherever he wants. asking for a special counsel designation denied that by the justice department and the justice department saying something different. this is what david weiss said for the justice department is saying that's not what he's saying. we want to get to the other people in that meeting. five other people were there. we want to talk to them and that's what we'll be pursuing just as quickly as we can. >> sean: they took contemporary's notes at the time. chairman smith, let me go to you. what was unfolding last night was beyond bizarre and that is a document that you had sent over talking about the whistle-blowers, new evidence. why the judge should not go along with this sweetheart plea deal and apparently a woman from hunter's law firm makes a call to the clerk of the court and tries to get to a document removed the night before it's going before the judge? and that didn't even get dealt with today? >> that's exactly right, chandra yesterday morning, we had our

attorney file an amicus brief before the court because we wanted to make sure the judge had the testimony of the two irs whistle-blowers before our committee. had credible information that needed to be provided about an hour later. a young lady called the court and said that there was private social security information in our filing and it needed to be taken down, presented themselves to be working for my attorney, my attorney noticed it within a short period of time, contacted the court, figured that out. the judge actually figured out by caller i.d. where this came from and that was a law firm of hunter biden's in new york. the judge ordered those lawyers to respond to the court by 9:00 last night or face sanctions. it's absolutely incredible that it would go to this level. let me tell you committees are the same attorneys, sean, that

the whistle-blowers testified saying that they heard these attorneys tell prosecutors that if they brought charges against the president's son, they'd be facing career suicide. >> sean: let me go to congressman chairman comber. so here, the evidence that you have uncovered in your committee and in your investigation, influence peddling schemes. in large part the evidence brought forth by the irs whistle-blowers. the whistle-blowers were prevented from interviewing any of the biden family members. the president, maybe they can make a case for it. everyone else, i don't think they should have been able to make a case for allowing the statute of limitations to pass and the tipping off the legal team on a very important issue that they were going to have a surprise visit and interview hunter biden. explain to me how this judge can

actually go along with this agreement with all that new information out there and available? >> she couldn't. the judge did the right thing. today was a victory for justice in america. if anyone was watching the whistle-blower hearing that we had to come of the oversight with the two credible whistle-blowers, they laid out perfectly that a series of crimes that the president said at the committee, it's not just about tax evasion. the tax evasion they are getting is just for two years. for a w-2 that they didn't include all the shell company income that they've had that no one knows what the reasoning is behind the millions of dollars they received from foreign nationals. it didn't include the foreign regisnationals registration act. a clear law that the president's son had violated. the money laundering. six banks filed reports with the treasury department that they

suspected this family was responsible laundering money from state owned entities. state owned entities are foreign countries! it's obvious to anyone who has any knowledge of the law that the president's sons committed a host of crimes and all roads lead to joe biden. that's the other thing. that's one of the most interesting things from the testimony that jason smith got in the interview and we heard in the hearing was that they wanted to interview biden family members and they felt pretty strongly that this was directly linked to joe biden. >> on monday at your committee will take a sworn disposition from devon archer, former business partner of hunter biden, and we expect him to testify that on 24, two dozen occasions, he can recall joe biden being used by hunter to call into meetings with forward in business, on foreign business deals with the foreign

business partners. this same joe biden that swore that he never once talked to his son about his foreign business dealings? >> there is a lot of speculation that that's what he's going to say. one thing jason smith wanted out, these lawyers have intimidated many of the witnesses that we try to bring forward predispositions in transcribed interviews. they told them things like you are only going to implicate yourself. we are not going to get in trouble p hopefully the witness is locked devon archer's and the other is that we are going to be bringing before the committee this summer, hopefully they saw what happened in that court today. in these lawyers aren't going to continue to get away with the shenanigans that they tried to pull yesterday when they lied and said that they were part of ways and means staff to get something removed. those days are over and we are in control of this thing and i believe that if these witnesses will come forward and tell the truth, the american people are going to be in for a big eye-opener with respect to joe biden. >> your investigation in the

judiciary community down the committee running in tandem with the investigation into the biden family witnesses and that's what is in weaponization of how the doj has been politicized. they didn't want to hear from the whistle-blowers and they are willing to make that sweetheart deal. that's not a deal to anyone in america would be able to get. does this add to the long list of special treatment at the biden have gotten. >> the judge asked the fundamental question. she asked the prosecutor and folks from the doj, has this kind of deal ever been put together before? is this unprecedented? the prosecutor about his answer was, no, your honor. he responded that this is why what chairman comber said. if this was a truly win for equal application of the law which is the hallmark of this great country, the greatest country ever, that's what we focus on, and that's the focus of gary shapley and mr. ziegler. they came forward because they

saw unequal application of the law been that's why we want to talk to these folks. get all the facts and move forward from there. >> sean: chairman smith. i'll ask you lastly here. the irs whistle-blowers serverst we've heard from, looks like they are going to contradict prosecutor weiss that he never said these things, that he didn't have the ability to bring cases in other jurisdictions. if this five, six, seven, maybe more whistle-blowers versus that one person, who are you going to believe? >> exactly. one important point is that the two irs whistle-blowers that came forward that testified in jamie comber's committee, their stories have stayed the same. the stories that have not stayed the same are those of prosecutor weiss and also the biden family. that is the issue. we have really credible whistle-blowers come forward and they are all singing from the

same tip. >> great job all three of you. the walls are caving in now on the biden syndicate, that's for sure. a lot more coming in the days, weeks, months ahead. thank you all. coming up, the white house scrambling after hunter's plea deal fell apart. later the media mob continues to shamelessly defend the biden family via greg jara and matt whitaker, they will react. by the way? programming note for another live audience show in new york city my guest includes dagan mcdowell, ryan dell mcbrien bread work. tickets are better than a broadway show. go to hannity.com for tickets.

will you pause it real quick? (mumbles) just sold the car to carvana. what? all i had to do was answer a couple questions and got a real offer in seconds. then, they just picked up the car and paid me right on the spot. sell your car at carvana dot com today.

>> sean: joe biden and his handlers at the white house spent years saying he one time never even discussed with zero experience hunter or his brother jim or anyone for that matter, hunter's foreign business dealing. as evidence to the contrary now grows the white house has quietly begun to change their

tune on the topic. instead of saying that he never once spoke to his son about his foreign business dealings he said i was never in business with my son and his foreign business dealings. pretty big distinction. white house press secretary karine jean-pierre was questioned on the charge but she refused to answer the question. >> moments ago you said nothing has changed when you were asked about president's previous remarks on his son's business dealings. but the language has in fact change. i want to clear this up once and for all. the president has previously said that he's never discussed overseas dealings with his son. but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with his sons. so why the updated language? which statement is true or is the semantics of them both true? >> as i stated on monday when i was asked this question will

double times nothing has changed, nothing has changed on this. nothing has changed on this. and so you could ask me a million different ways on this question, nothing has changed. >> texas senator ted cruz. senator, thanks for being with us. now i am not a harvard law school graduate like you are. but i think there is a great distinction between mama i never spoke to my son about his foreign business dealings and now that we have all the evidence available to prove to the contrary that in fact that he did, they now change it to that he never went to business with his son. i would say that that is a huge difference and not even... you couldn't even describe it as parsing words here. >> i've got to say sean, i want to play poker with karine jean-pierre. she is a terrible, terrible liar. she has got a towel.

sometimes at a poker table someone will twist a ring or pulled a her ear or do something when they are bluffing for karine jean-pierre, hertel is she'll tell you that i'm going to tell you the exact same thing i tell you a a thousand times before. you know the next things out of her mouth is going to be totally different from anything she's said before. >> sean: let me get your reaction to what happened in court today. i do not know if you share my suspicion. there's no way in my mind that the prosecutor and the defense did not have a firm agreement that there would be no future charges. i think the judge called him out. they knew that they couldn't admit it publicly. that's why i think that you agree with that suspicion. >> i do. they have a deal. a sweetheart deal, designed to get hunter biden a slap on the wrist to get away with zero jail time and it's most important function was to cover up for the big guy, cover up with joe biden to say all these matters are done. it's all closed and over. i think if this plea hearing had

been the day after the plea deal was announced, probably they would've stuck to their guns and it might as well have been improved but what happened was several weeks passed and several weeks passed, more evidence came out. the fda 23 came out. the two whistle-blowers testified before the house of representatives accusing the tournament down the attorney general of lying under oath, accusing the attorney general of obstruction of justice in this case. and suddenly the delaware u.s. attorney's office in the court, realized they couldn't stand up in court and say, no, we are not going to investigate any of this new evidence that came roaring out. that became impossible to say. they said, of course we are going to investigate that and suddenly hunter's lawyers said we are out of here in the whole thing blew up. i'm glad it blew up. this deal stung from day one and it was about covering up hunter and more importantly covering up

joe biden potter's involvement in the corruption. >> senator, based on what we know now, we have joe biden on tape admitting that he leveraged 1 billion taxpayer dollars to get a prosecutor in ukraine fired but he had been investigating mar burisma. had no experience at all this but down the basement we reading with the whatsapp messages. lo and behold, a chinese oil exact sends over $5 million to the bidens within a week. how would you describe it? i would say that this is the biden bribery scandal allegations. if you are a prosecuting attorney, how strong the case are you looking at? by what we know right now? >> we have now the fd-1023, the

fbi report that was prepared in 2020 when a controversial human source raise allegations that joe biden as vice president personally received bribes from ukrainian oligarch from official favors vice president of the united states. this was damning but i do a podcast three days a week. the podcast has gone into the details of what's in this fd-1023. walking through it. some of the quotes for him, that do it would have a down like an on burisma in united states and the oligarch replied something to the effect of, don't worry,

hunter will take care of all those issues through his dad. allegedly he also said it costs 5 million to pay one biden and 5 million to pay another biden. so further allegedly said hunter biden, "was stupid, dog smarter." this is in the fbi form. the controversial source asked did hunter biden or joe biden tell he needed to retain hunter biden, replied, they both did. says he has many text messages and recordings that can show he was forced to make such payments. he says he has 17 audio recordings of his conversations with the bidens. 15 with hunter, to go with joe. if this is true joe biden should be impeached and impeached not for high crimes and misdemeanors but for bribery which is explicitly enumerated in the

constitution but he should be removed from office. he should be prosecuted and he should go to jail for taking millions of dollars of bribes if this is true. >> all evidence and she's showing following the money, they've got $5 million after the whatsapp message. and certainly after joe leveraged that money in ukraine and got the prosecutor fired, zero experience hunter got paid in obscene amounts of money and that continued. senator cruz, thanks for being with us, sir. growing evidence pointing to a massive corruption scene involving the bidens' overseas business dealings and the mob in the media they are whining, laughably claiming that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing. of course, the ladies of that hard-hitting news show "the view" on abc hacked their way in with this with kind of ridiculous comments. take a look. >> what is really happening h

here? how much punishment does biden need because he won? >> former acting attorney general matt whitaker, good to see you both. let's get your take on today. what we know now, can you not make a prima facie case that joe and hunter biden, joe in particular was active and involved in had full knowledge of hunter biden doing business deals in many cases with our top political, geopolitical photos? >> absolutely you can make a very compelling case. i think it does rise to the level, not just of criminal activity, but as senator cruz mentioned, impeachable offenses, treason and bribery. high crimes and misdemeanors. speaker mccarthy is on the right track to say an inquiry, and impeachment inquiry is now merited. as for the events of today, this

was always a rigged investigation and a crooked plea deal. everybody knew it. this was a deal that began to unravel the very moment five weeks ago when it was announced. and, you know, it made no sense at the time. and rushing to the nearest television camera and said, it's all over. no criminal charges beyond this. it has ended which prompted the doj to issue a lie. oh, there is an ongoing investigation. they perpetrated that lie so they wouldn't have to answer questions from congress. the judge knew it. she zeroed in on it today. >> sean: she smoked it out. >> she smoked it out and said if there is an ongoing investigation and maybe f.a.r.a. charges against hunter biden, why are you agreeing to a plea deal now? it makes no sense.

>> sean: she made the point by saying you're taking away the rights of your own clients. >> absolutely right. >> she asked the most important question of all. mr. prosecutor, is there any precedent for this kind of a plea deal and he sheepishly admitted, no, your honor, this is unprecedented. >> wow. that's powerful. what does this all tell you about what i believe is a weaponized and politicized department of justice under merrick garland? >> right now, just as hanging on by a thread and while it had a small victory for the rule of law, i'm concerned. usually we have an adversarial system where the prosecutor and defense stand on two different times. in this case they are both working to the same end. thank god this judge was willing to actually stand for justice and to not just rubber-stamp an agreement that quite frankly when i was u.s. attorney i would've laughed out of my office if somebody had proposed

this. there's so many violations congress has done a good job of revealing those. but there's more to come. this fd-1023 at senator cruz points out is really a road map. the fact that they stop the investigation leading up to the 2020 election and didn't restart it? that tells you that merrick garland and the entire leadership of the department of justice is corrupt. and they are covering for joe biden. >> you've got the fd 1023. you got the irs whistle-blowers. you've got the fbi and doj running interference. there is a lot of issues in play here. that's why these committee hearings in the judiciary committee and the oversight committee are running in tandem are going to hopefully get us the truth which they been hiding for a long time. thank you, matt whitaker. granholm is always good to see you. up next. on capitol hill, and explosive hearing today on ufos.

you aren't going to believe what we are learning. we have an exclusive interview with the chairman, is coming up straight ahead. otc strength lidocaine that contours to the body to relieve pain right where it hurts. and did we mention, it really, really sticks? salonpas, it's good medicine. hi, i'm michael, i've lost 62 pounds on golo and i have kept it off. most of the weight that i gained was strictly in my belly which is a sign of insulin resistance. but since golo, that weight has completely gone away, as you can tell. thanks to golo and release, i've got my life and my health back.

>> fascinating hearing on capitol hill today as former military and intelligence officials, people highly ranked, american heroes, they opened up about ufos and the government's alleged role in studying them may be even covering up their existence. take a look for yourself. >> do you believe that our government is in possession of uaps? >> absolutely after interviewing 40 witnesses over 40 years. there has been activity by alien or by nonhuman technology and/or beings that has caused harm to humans? >> i can't get into the specifics in an open environment. but at least the activity that i personally witnessed, and i have to be really careful here.

what i personally witnessed myself, and my wife, it was very disturbing. >> i can't ask when you thought this occurred. if you believe we have a crash cath down the craft stated earlier, do we have the bodies of the pilots to piloted this? >> as i said in my "news nation" interview, biologics came with some of these discoveries. yes. >> where they human or nonhuman biologics? >> nonhuman and that was the assessment of people with direct knowledge i'd talk to are still on the program. >> we reached out for the department of defense for comment. told us that there is no evidence that they have any extraterrestrial materials in their possession. joining us with more is the one of the leaders of this hearing, dentistry congressman tom tennessee, spent tom burchett is with us. congressman, we have testimony under oath that nonhuman bodies

have been recovered, biologics was the term they used. and that in fact the u.s. has recovered technology and i look at the witness list and we are talking about f18 fire pilots. we are looking at people that are well respected and in the highest ranks of governments. and the air force, giving testimony. why do i not think they are lying? why do i believe them? >> they are not. my name is tim. sorry to correct you. >> sean: sorry. >> that's all right. >> sean: i'm going to blame my staff and throw them down the stairs. >> don't do that, they are the ones who invited me back. >> sean: sorry about that. >> the reality is that the three patriotic americans, they literally risk their careers and their reputations by coming in and their legacy. we have been told about this for

years. the tic tac videos which you can google permit not tiktok, not the chinese common is propaganda, but that tic tac, the candy, videos. one of the pilots engage them and they basically describe something that was not of this world and they said, we asked if there is anything capable of doing this, russians, chinese, us. no. there is not. and then asked if it would have been an american reverse engineered? and they said, why would they be testing in our test range with $50 billion aircraft in the air and brave american pilots? where left to one conclusion that this is going on. at the pentagon, who would rather spend all our money overseas in the list wars will tell you now after chuck schumer is requesting an inquiry and starting may be a new department to study this, they are just going to ask for more money. the reality is they don't need another god dang red sent from

us. they have been passed audit since they've been auditing them. the truth is all we want is transparency. turn loose those records. myself, matt gaetz, representative luna went down to eglin air force base in florida and where basically we were told that we'd be briefed , see some craft. we were turned away. they showed us some pretty horrible things that were going on in our country and our coast, but nothing to do with that. matt on the phone, called the pentagon and they rushed in some pilots. able to talk to one pilot. this cover-up has gone on continuously. case in point. i had an amendment on the faa reauthorization. all it said was, if a commercial pilot spots an object in the air phenomenally or are you or what have you, when they reported to the ffa, they have to issue that report to congress. well, i was told by our

leadership that it was blocked by the intelligence community. not the committee, the community. we have the pentagon, the bureaucrat sitting behind a desk somewhere telling your united states congress what to do. congress is going to have to get some guts. i heard jim jordan talk about it. i've been talking about it. we need to start talking about purse strings pentagon. >> sean: you are convinced. nonhuman remains or biologics and technology that we don't have available here on earth, you believe our government has and is lying to the american people? >> i do. 100%. too many brave americans have told me that and they have nothing to gain and everything to lose. >> i hope they are visiting my house anytime soon. fascinating. thank you, congressman. we appreciate you staying with us. straight ahead tonight. guess what, you aren't going to believe what hillary clinton is now blaming maga republicans for now. you'll love this. that's straight ahead.

i was told my small business wouldn't qualify for an erc tax refund. you should get a second opinion from innovation refunds at no upfront cost. sometimes you need a second opinion. [coughs] good to go. yeah, i think i'll get a second opinion. all these walls gotta go! ah ah ah! i'd love a second opinion. no. i'm going to get a second opinion. with innovation refunds, there's no upfront cost to find out. so why not check like i did for my small business? take the first step to see if your small business qualifies for the erc.

(janet) so much space!... that open kitchen! (tanya) oooh definitely the one! (ethan) but how can you sell your house when we're stuck on a space station for months???!!! (brian) no guys, opendoor gives you the flexibility to sell and buy on your timeline. (janet) nice! (intercom) flightdeck, see you at the house warming.

we're traveling all across america, talking to people about their hearts. how's the heart? - good. - you sure? - i think so. - how do you know? let me show you something. put two fingers right on those pads. look at that! that's your heart! that is pretty awesome. with kardiamobile, you can take a medical-grade ekg in just 30 seconds, from anywhere. kardiamobile is proven to detect atrial fibrillation, one of the leading causes of stroke. kardiamobile is now available for just $79. order at kardia.com or amazon. [bushes rustling] [door opening] ♪dramatic music♪ yes! hon! the weathertech's here. ♪ weathertech is the ultimate protection for your vehicle.

laser-measured floorliners... no drill mudflaps... cargoliner... bumpstep... seat protector... and cupfone. ♪ what about my car? weathertech.

♪ >> sean: as we all know democrats love blaming all of their problems on those evil rascally maga republicans. yesterday hillary clinton tweeted out a montage of headlines about record breaking summer heat and said, maga republicans are to blame. okay. anyway, republicans now control the weather all while, according to joe biden himself, the president, he -- did you guys know this? joe biden -- well, first of all al gore created the internet and joe biden cured cancer. he said it. >> can do anything at all, joe, what would you do? i said i would cure cancer. he looked at me like why cancer?

because no one thinks we can. that's why. and we can. we ended cancer as we know it >> sean: okay, joining us now to discuss these lies from the left, outnumbered cohost emily compagno along with washington examiner op-ed editor kayleigh hadid white. i'm still having a hard time grasping the reality that that corps is our president because i know he doesn't know what day of the week it is and it's frustrating to me but the meade just ignores it. i was talking to greg gutfeld about this. that's why he's number one in late night because they ignore the obvious material that, you know, carson and leno would have run with. >> that's right. and an a approximately gist for the state right now and the problem is the people getting the worst of it is the american people that have to suffer through the crypt keeper as the commander in chief. and for those that have loved ones for deployed. >> jamie: you said crypt keeper?

>> yes, i had to see and race your corpse. having him as such a frail symbol of the commander in chief not only for global leaders but also him making decisions there's an added level of stress for anyone that has a loved one deployed knock very knowing that one is the one making decisions. it's traumatic and we deserve better. and the fact a couple years ago a reporter dared to ask him about taking a cognitive test when he was already showing such signs of frailty and frankly dementia he dared to snap back and say what are you a junky? should you take a test for your job? he said the demands of my job are my constant test. in my opinion, then, he is utterly failing then every day >> sean: kayleigh, here's what i think-is one fall away or as this scandal involving hunter and himself and the lies that he told and the money they took from the countries they took gets bigger and bigger, i think the democrats are going to push

him out of the way and throw him to the way side am i wrong. >> absolutely. and if joe biden is great since he cured cancer might i suggest he cures dementia next since that seems to be morell van. at that have what point does the pattern become a problem because the white house likes to blame this on his long history of gaffes and even edited his remarks about the cancer initiative to actually clarify that he didn't mean that we have already cured cancer, they edit to say that, oh, in the future we might cure cancer. so not only is the white house trying to rewrite history to mark out the fact that biden has this history of gaffes, but the fact is the public is wide away to this and see that it is a massive problem. >> greg: exit question, yes or no, will biden be the nominee? >> yes. >> they can't afford not to run him >> sean: wow. >> doomsday here. sorry, sorry for that >> sean: i'm hope he is.

great to have you both. quick programming note another live audience show tomorrow night, we have jimmy failla, tomi lahren, dagen mick do you mean brian bremberg. tickets are free go to hannity.com. unfortunately that's all the time we have this eveningment please set your dvr so you never ever ever ever miss an episode of hannity in the meantime let not your heart be troubled because greg gutfeld's going to put a smile on your face. ♪ ♪ [cheers and applause]. >> greg: all right, here we go this better be loud. happy wednesday everyone. so was it just a speech or will they really impeach? bus, first, what's the latest on the biden crime family? yeah, huh? pretty g specifically commander, the new first family dog whose st