there you go, wisconsin-nice. tomorrow on "special report" we will talk to wisconsin voters about the issues on their minds ahead of wednesday's debate. and, remember, if you can't catch us live, set your dvr 6:00 p.m. in the east. 3:00 p.m. on the west coast. thanks for inviting us into your home tonight. that's it for this "special report" from milwaukee, fair, balanced and unafraid. here's laura. ♪ >> laura: hello, everyone. i'm laura ingraham. this is the ingraham angle from washington tonight. thanks for being with us. president biden has finally arrived in maui. he said a few words a few moments ago about the damage from the wildfires and the government's response. we'll monitor his visit and bring you any breaking news. plus, my angle about the so-called threats to democracy only if trump wins, later in the show. but, first, well, the truth is coming out about hunter biden slowly but it is coming. we now know that the only reason

the justice department agreed to that plea deal for hunter is because his attorneys threatened to put joe on the stand i guess putting the squeeze on chinese business execs isn't the only thing. warned the doj president biden now unquestionably would be a fact witness for any defense in any criminal trial. putting him on the stand against his own justice department could cause, he said, a constitutional crisis. now, does anyone think that joe biden somehow wasn't kept abreast of any of this? come on. if the threats hunter made in his what happ whatsapp message . this is the kind of intimidation tactic that joe biden would completely agree to. and as andy mccarthy pointed out today, it's just another example of the biden family corruption.

>> you have these big, bad justice department prosecutors who aren't supposed to be afraid of anything. they got this guy dead to rights on a 10-year gun felony and tax evasion charges and they are afraid to charge him. they don't want to charge joe biden's son. this is exactly what access to joe biden is. this is why people were willing to pay millions of dollars to get it. that's what the scheme was. >> laura: everyone gets it. including hunter's attorneys. use the biden name, just make sure you are either protecting or enriching the family. they would have gotten away with all of this, this entire sweetheart plea deal if it wasn't for those pesky whistleblowers. the "new york times" reporting over the weekend that weiss wasn't originally even going to require a guilty plea from hunter on any of the charges. mind boggling. but his position changed around the time a pair of irs officials

on the case accused the doj of hamstringing the investigation. what happens when you get in the way of protecting the biden family like those whistleblowers told the doj by disclosing details of the investigation to congress, the irs agents broke the law and that they should be prosecuted. joining me now is the attorney for whistleblower gary shapley, kristin leavitt. he is the president of empower oversight. tristan, your reaction to that reporting, specifically this allegation that your line was the one breaking the law? >> it's clearly utterly ridiculous on its face. we have seen this throughout the threats the hunter biden legal team made. last summer chris clark told the prosecutors even before this threat to put joe biden on the stand that charging joe biden would be a career killer for them. and he is trying what he can to make it be a career killer for our clients as well.

so it's unfortunate but not a surprise at all the pleadings had asked chairman amik cass brief giving details be removed from the docket. they claimed there was grand jury or other information there that shouldn't have been and george nor eke can a really smacked that down saying making such broad allegations was irresponsible of . what is your client saying that they wouldn't have asked him for the guilty plea at all if they didn't come forward. imagine if they hadn't come forward? what's his reaction been. >> several key points stuck out to gary. first off is that knowing now what was happening between the prosecutors and the defense counsel really adds a whole new dimension for the investigators.

they were cut out from the meetings that the prosecutors had with defense counsel now we know about the interactions. the threat to have joe biden testify came at important time. important for your viewers to understand. that letter was sent on halloween in 2022. that letter came at a time when u.s. assistant david weiss bass to have the 2014, 2015 tax charges, including a felony for 2014 for making false reports burisma income. about to expire. statute of limitations. weiss had a decision to make. i don't think it's a coincidence at all that chris clark is writing to weiss and saying hey, we would put the president on the stand at a time when he is making a decision about whether to let these burisma charges go. so i think that's very significant. the other thing that i think really stands out to the investigators is that this march

than anything points out there should have been a special counsel earlier in the investigation. at that point they should have immediately appointed him one. >> laura: also you, the idea that we discovered the president is using these pseudonyms to communicate the jrb, whether it's acronyms or pseudonyms to disguise his identity. why do you that if it was just a friendly conversation between father and son? that also gives more credence to what your client and the whistleblowers said all along. this needed to be delved into seriously by objective prosecutor were no political ties, none. >> absolutely. what you see, instead, looking at the information that senator chuck grassley has put out there from unrelated whistleblowers is that when this information, for instance, about the fd 1023 from

the fbi alleging the -- that burisma bribe not only hunter biden but joe biden, that being presented to the delaware u.s. attorney's office, the irs agents were cut out just five weeks later, the same as the attorney who received those allegations was telling investigators you can't ask anything about the dad. this investigation was hobbled and hamstrung from the very beginning because people refused to see what was right in front of their faces. >> laura: remember tristan garland was saying early on that authority. a wide berth in which to operate. and that clearly is not the case. >> no question. and what these articles also revealed was something that's very, very significant. which is that less than five weeks after merrick garland swore to congress, in fact, senator grassley specifically, that there would be -- that weiss would not have any interference by the justice department. you see that an official from

the deputy attorney general's office responded to an inquiry from chris clark trying to get anyone at doj say where to go if weiss charged him. for a deputy attorney general official to set up a meeting and join the meeting with chris clark and david weiss clearly shows that merrick garland's testimony to congress was just not accurate. >> laura: christian great to see you. thank you very much. while the doj tries to slow walk the hunter biden investigation whatever form of it exists today. the house g.o.p. is not stopping. late today, four new subpoenas were issued for irs and fbi officials who were present or had direct knowledge of a meeting in which the now special counsel david weiss allegedly claimed he was prevented from bringing charges against hunter biden for tax crimes. joining me now sol wisenburg former deputy independent counsel and fox news contributor. sol, we will get to that in a moment. i first want to address this

other issue and your reaction, again, to hunter's attorneys saying that putting president biden on the stand would cause a, quote, constitutional drivers. what of that? >> it's an absolute joke and would be considered an absolute joke by any responsible prosecutor. i would have kicked somebody out of my office who said that to begin with have they forgotten that william jefferson clinton testified for the defense in the white water trial? he was a defense witness. there was no constitutional crisis. they made accommodations because he was president. no constitutional crisis here. that's number one. number two, that assumes that the joe biden would ever want to testify or whether or not a district judge would allow him to testify, allow the defense to put him on because there would have to be a threshold showing of some relevancy. so it's a joke is an argument

and it's a bigger joke if any prosecutor in the department of justice took it seriously. >> laura: well, at this point, when we see the -- this evidence that they would not have even asked hunter biden for a plea in this case were it not for these whistleblowers coming forward, again, what does this tell you about the -- just the objective -- by any objective measure what this investigation was really like? >> it was -- i was astounded to hear that it's the it's like the prosecutors had stockholm syndrome. and there are so many things about this case. this is the thing i want to stress to your viewers, there is some things about this case within the department of justice that are just simply not how it's done. they are not by the book. they are not kosher. and this is just one of them. i could give you several

examples. and just the statements alone. the inconsistent statements alone by weiss, since this story broke are just appalling. first saying that he did have the authority, then limiting that here's the key thing that he has never refuted. he has never in any way refuted or denied that at that meeting on may 22nd, sorry, may 7th, 2022 meeting, he told a room full of fbi and irs criminal agents that he did not have the authority to prosecute hunter biden and that authority had been denied by the d.c. us attorney's office. that is completely inconsistent with him saying that he had ultimate authority and completely inconsistent with everything merrick garland said about the case. >> laura: well, cnn's evan perez made a comment about the "new york times" reporting on this. watch. police cars i think, without a doubt, have been injected in this investigation, and it's been very clear for a long time.

the stories that emerged this weekend, clearly show that there are at least some people involved in this investigation who were ready to end this. >> laura: sol, your reaction? >> well, of course that's true. and the amazing thing if by ready to end it, kill it i think that's true. the amazing thing the decision had been made by weiss in 2022 ultimately and by the department, the doj tax, there is enough to indict here and you can indict here and then the defense -- hunter's defense attorneys hear about it and go in and start lobbying and it's all over. he just rolls them. >> really quite stunning. >> bakari sellers is a former congressman from south carolina. he was talking about the comparison between what is being alleged against the biden family

and donald trump. and all the indictments coming forward. check this out. there is a whole lot of what aboutism when it comes to hunter biden. there is a great deal of difference between the multiple felony accounts the president of the united states is looking at versus some activities or actions by this president's son. >> laura: yeah. trying to say well, these rumblings about biden's son and meanwhile we have indictments piling up against trump, that actually allege credible wrongdoing. so, neither -- i mean, the other one suspect here and the other one is down there. >> well, the question is why isn't there an indictment against hunter biden? the reason there isn't is because of this political interference. and i have never been impressed by what about -- to me, he is engaging in what aboutism. every case should be judged on its own merits. and let me just tell you, the hunter biden investigation is a

major black mark in a major in the doj, a major scandal in doj history and there should have been as i said from the very beginning there, should have been a special counsel. and this is a reason why i'm the only one apparently in america who believes. this they should resuscitate the independent counsel statute. you need real independence in this situation. >> laura: sol, this is so wild on so many levels. we have a lot more to ask you but we are going to bring you back tomorrow. thanks so much, sol. all right. you're not going to believe what the latest suggestion from the left is on how to supposedly save our democracy. i actually thought this was a joke when someone sent it to me. but, apparently it was true. my angle explains next. ♪ when our team designed acellus gold, we looked for ways to make it easier than ever for parents to stay involved in their child's education. as a teacher, acellus gold gives me a way to keep the parents connected with what's going on here at school.

i love that i can sign in to the acellus app and see what my student did that day where they struggle and what they succeeded in. it gives parents an opportunity to celebrate achievements with their students and provide motivation and encouragement when needed. parents can dive in and review a particular lesson or look ahead and see what's coming in the course. there was a point where my student really struggled in math when i was able to log into acellus gold and see the effort and work that got him back up to grade level. it gave me a new appreciation for the teachers who are helping him.

>> laura: the democracy busters that's the focus of tonight's angle. all right. heads we win. tails you lose. that's kind of how our vaunted defenders of democracy seem to be framing the 2024 election cycle. in other words, if biden wins, all will be well again in the world. democracy lives to see another day. but, if someone like trump ends

up winning meaning they win enough states to push him over 270 electoral votes it, means the whole system implodes. warning, blow hard alert. >> the consequences of losing any candidate losing to donald trump and then becoming the next president catastrophic for american democracy. >> if these people were to gain power again, then i really do think that only the second time in american history we would put our collective fate at risk. >> dereks associated with another trump presidency, like, say, the existential threat to our democracy. >> this is a close race. and i think this is the danger for those that actually believe in democracy and want to preserve it. >> laura: oh, i get it. democracy only works going forward if they can get enough mail in ballots returned and early votes cast to swamp the populist. giving the win to the

octogenarian who cannot find his way off the stage. that is a very con ventricle yens yent way of approaching things. is it not? now, they are obviously freaking out and they are resorting to strained legal arguments even fringe theories turn constitution into silly putty to stretch into any way you want. scholars are trying to argue that trump should be barred, constitutionally barred from running for office. now, this is patently absurd, especially coming from judges who once called themselves originalist like our own friend mike luttig. i want you to remember that they strenuously argued that trump's team was guilty of wildly distorting the constitution regarding challenges to the state counts and the establishing of alternate slate of electors, watch. >> the people that that wrote

the 14th amendment were not fools. they realized if those people who try to overturn the country, who try to get rid of our peaceful transitions of power are, again, put in power, that would be the end of the nation. the end of democracy. >> all officials, federal and state, who have a responsibility to put on the ballot candidates for the presidency of the united states for instance, they, himself or herself are obligated under the constitution to determine whether donald trump qualifies to be put on the ballot. >> laura: what? try to follow that. now, again, they accused trump of pulling apart the constitution after the election. and you can argue about what trump did. but what are they doing? and to think by the way he was

once considered supreme court material during the bush administration. what a total disgrace. and it pains me to say that. they ever terrified that the people are going to reject both biden and them and their illogical views. and, of course, you can always count on academia to give birth to the most radical proposals. the protect teres of our cherished. grant wants to abolish elections all together writing the ancient greeks democracy. selected through certain tuition, a random lottery from a pool of candidates. in the united states we use a version of the lottery to selected jurors. what if we did the same with mayors, governors, legislators, justices and even presidents? okay. well, before you just write this off completely and did i get a good chuckle out of it, remember this the gender fluidity movement, the trans movement.

crt, those fringe theories were also born in the universities as well. so once again, the democrat's finger of accusation is always pointed back at them. they accuse trump and if it wasn't trump it would be someone elms of undermining democracy, committing felonies because he challenged the election results. yet, we have already documented this. you know, they have challenged repeatedly challenged election results. and when they do it, they say it's just part of the democratic process. so the bottom line is, democrats just simply don't much like or trust you, the voters. they think you're stupid. but you're not. you see what works and what doesn't work. what prosperity is and what it's not. you know when the border is secure and when it's open. and you know that elections should be determined by the voters. certainly not controlled by big

donors or big tech orbiter academics desperate for attention. that's democracy. and that's the angle. all right. coming up, the biden administration is already giving ukraine money for as long as it takes. but what communist regime is trying to cash in on the u.s. bailout as well? bob lighthizer former ustr for trump is he here next to explain. ♪ especially when it comes to your child's education. introducing power homeschool the official provider of online acellus courses for parents independently homeschooling their children. i really love how flexible the program is. it allows my child to work at her own pace and on her own schedule. join the growing community of parents who have discovered the power of power homeschool. visit our website at power homeschool dot org to learn more and start your child's educational journey.

will you pause it real quick? (mumbles) just sold the car to carvana. what? all i had to do was answer a couple questions and got a real offer in seconds. then, they just picked up the car and paid me right on the spot. sell your car at carvana dot com today.

♪ >> laura: now, one question the voters are going to need to think about in 2024 is hardly ever discussed. why are the democrats and the corporate types so obsessed with helping communists? what do you mean, laura? well, you probably heard with some of the major financial problems now facing china. they have a debt crisis. they have a housing crisis. of course, they have a birth rate crisis. they have a skyrocketing youth unemployment. they have flagging g.d.p. growth, even though they lie

about that all the time and they have slowing exports. now, none of this is our problem. this was all self-inflicted damage china and ccp did for itself. at a time when americans are living paycheck to paycheck. we at the angle sense a building momentum for the support of some kind of taxpayer bailout or some assistance or some softening toward china, maybe removing tarves gradually in order to help them through this period as american seeing opportunity for u.s. growth? be careful what you wish for warned obama secretary hank powellson. the effect would ripple around the world economically and geopolitically. instantaneous repercussions could be felt in worldwide capital markets. well, just fast forward a little bit. any type of handout any bailout

a few things, gift to the ccp for all their bad behavior and gift to pollute democrats worldwide. three, a slap in the face of the american middle class as well it. would also be a complete act of self-sabotage for the united states. did would kind of be like giving a loaded gun to a man threatening to kill you when his own gun jams. we never helped the former soviet union when it began to falter and that was the right call. but, of course, the difference now is that america stupidly tethered itself to china by off-shoring everything from manufacturing in medicines to electronics, ultimately ceding the market to most powerful adversary it was very, very stupid. all the reason now we need to seriously begin decoupling from china. the trump tariffs, most of them are still in place. microchip restrictions are already being felt in china. that's good. it's an evil and a corrupt

regime it is hell bent on eclipsing the u.s. militarily and economically. and ultimately the goal is to, of course, vanquish democracy itself. we should not give them a penny in economic aid. not one penny. but help is precisely what they are going to be asking for this week when gina roman dough arrives and they know that she will probably lend a friendly ear at a high level we need to do business with china wherever we can we need to promote wherever we can there is no national security risk to the united states coffee and health and beauty aids to china. >> laura: this is not a serious person. i don't know should we have done cosmetic business with the former soviet union late 70s and early 80's? our massive trade deficit is not going to be evened out by exports of mascara and

starbucks, sweetheart let's not forget she is the latest in the parade of top biden officials who traveled to beijing to help massage the relationship. of course, we had the climate czar john kerry. then it was tony blinken. and then not to be left out treasury secretary janet yellen. all of them did nothing but embarrass us there and just to give you an idea. if they are all in to reducing their carbon footprints, then why not just hold the next cabinet meeting for the biden administration in beijing. after all, they all seem more comfortable answering to the chinese than to the american people at this point joining me now is bob light houser. former trait representative under president trump. just days ago president biden said we are not looking for a fight with china. we are looking for a rational relationship your reaction?

first of all it's important what you do an adversary china is they want to be number one in the world. they have the biggest army, the biggest navy. they are militarizing the south china sea we have had to u.s. sailors arrested for espionage for china. they have had warships off alaska. you have got to remind yourself, first, what we are dealing with and you do that so well secondly, we have to remind ourselves they have been waging an economic war against the united states for at least the last two decades. probably the last three or four, and they have been winning so the notion that we should do anything to help them out is really beyond ridiculous. one we have to protect our

technology transferring our wealth. the wealth of our children and our grandchildren to china they are using it to build an army and navy and technology it. makes literally no sense at all. we act like imports from china are good things. imports from china create wealth for china. it is -- in the first place. in the second place, i don't know how serious their economic problems are. but, whatever they are, they are their problems. they be not our problems. and the notion that we should have more trade, which really means a bigger trade deficit with china to help them out is madness. you know, let me just make one last point. their economy -- their economy has grown 10 fold in the last 20 years. almost all of that growth or a good part of it is wealth transfer trillions of dollars of wealth transfer and technology theft from the united states. so, i mean, look it, they can

handle their own problems. whatever the heck they want. what we need to do is to start strategic decoupling. get back to balanced trade. we'll sell them their cosmetics and we will buy the same amount from them that they sell to us. not three or times as much. then we have got to protect our technology. >> laura: bob, what do you think about the states having to step in to say no more land purchases in texas or in north dakota or the federal government doesn't seem to have a problem with this. i don't think american citizens can go to china and buy land certainly not military bases correct, bob. >> they can't buy it anywhere and they can't lease it without government approval. it is crazy. i'm glad the states are doing it. it's clearly a federal responsibility. and you look at things like tiktok. there ought to be a vote tomorrow morning just to ban that in the congress. there is no upside to that. and nothing but downside. it is sort of amazing how lax

particularly the current crowd has been on taking on this lethal threat. >> now, bob, do you think that in -- heaven forbid a second biden term, that's hard for knee even say that, that a bailout -- we call it a bailout or help or assistance, you could see them justifying oh, let's remove some of the tariffs that you are great work at ustr as strayed rep, you put in place. i see them appealing those tariffs back. do you agree with me. i don't know what it is, but i can translate it into chinese. it means surrender we ought to be increasing the tariffs enough to balance trade. >> laura: bob, i really appreciate your wisdom tonight of all nights. thank you so much. earlier i said hank paulson was

obama's treasury sect i meant bush but on a lot of things the same thing. unseeming move to border and defy congress and political reality am bushes the. raymond arroyo has the details. "seen and unseen" is next. ♪

e to duckduckgo on all your device

duckduckgo comes with a built in engine like google, but it's pri and doesn't spy on your searches and duckduckgo lets you browse like chrome, but it blocks cooki and creepy ads that follow you a from google and other companies. and there's no catch. it's free. we make money from ads, but they don't follow you around showing the millions of people taking back their privacy by downloading duckduckgo on all your devices today.

>> laura: time for seen and unseen segment. we expose the stories behind the headlines. for that we turn to fox news contributor raymond arroyo. all right, raymond, do you remember when joe biden said this? >> how do you think things are going at the border, sir? >> much better than you all expected. ha ha ha ha. >> laura: sort of gives you the, what? [laughter] >> i love how he is laughing. it makes you feel that he is on to something that you don't quite know, laura. it turns out we might be right. that democrat controlled senate passed the defense bill that requires the completion of the border wall. using materials rusting along the southern border since the trump administration. you'll remember, we showed our audience much of that from the sky. but, as the house considers the bill, the biden administration has been quietly selling off those raw materials at auction. talk about unseen.

they have unloaded more than half of the $300 million worth of border wall parts for pennies on the dollar, laura. i think this is called defying congress or undermining democracy as you mentioned earlier in the show. >> laura: maybe we should -- since we are giving everything away to ukraine, maybe we should just send the border wall over there and they can drop it on the russian troops. continue i mean, it's just -- you don't expect anything to go right for these people. it's just insanity. >> that may be the only way to get that border wall built. and i love. this i just found this out today. biden spent $2 billion on storage for these parts that he is selling for pennies. this is really disgusting. but, laura, i want to turn to politics for a moment. at the big g.o.p. debate on wednesday, msnbc's the g.o.p. candidates to go after donald trump, hard. >> if they don't go after donald trump, then they are not really

debating. >> they are either running for vice president or they are hoping that he disappears in a legal fog. none of these people are going up on the stage wednesday to offer americans something different. >> laura: what? >> this is absurd. they are offering something different from joe biden. i love how msnbc, that has been hoping and praying that trump disappears into a legal fog, is now chastising others for helping he disappears into a legal fog. whatever the case, there is a lot of smoke being blown at msnbc. i don't think you can take any of these seriously. >> laura: i think ronna mcdaniel and all of the of thecandidates should take noy time an msnbc panel comes up. when you hear them speak, take notes because they have your best interest at heart. right, just do the opposite and you will do fine. meanwhile over at cnn, mild panic has begun to set in, laura, as they encounter polls

showing biden and trump neck and neck within the margin of error. oh. look at these. >> one point. one point, if you go back at where we were at this point four years ago, joe biden's lead was high single digits to low double digits. so this idea that donald trump can't win the general election. i want you to lose that idea. donald trump is polling better right now than basically at any pointed during the entire 2020. >> that's fascinating. >> that's fascinating. that's stomach turning for them. >> faces, laura. they are like that's fascinating, oh, very interesting. >> let's go on to lady gaga story. let's go on what happened with taylor swift at that wedding over the weekend. they were just swarming her. >> exactly. you know, laura, i was looking at this over the weekend. cbs news may be way ahead of the curve. they dropped what could be the biggest story of the year and if

you notice, cbs posted this tweet friday. read it closely. former president joe biden holds news conference. talk about a scoop, laura. they issued a correction. but we will be watching for a follow-up on this breaking news story. former president joe biden, imagine that. cbs of all people. >> laura: that's one of the good moments. i love that. okay. finally, it was revealed this week while the squad was urging everybody to defund the police and trying to limit second amendment rights. guess who spent $1.2 million in campaign dollars on private security? cori bush spent more than 736,000. aoc nearly 273,000. your friend ilhan omar 125,000. and all of this on top of the taxpayer funded security detail each of them enjoys from the

capitol police. this is rich watching this -- these numbers come out and, by the way, this is all federal election commission figures that the "new york post" got their hands on this. is disgraceful. >> laura: but, remember, regular people shouldn't be able to defend themselves, right? they shouldn't be able to like carry concealed or anything. they are fine because they have private security to the tune of several hundred thousand dollars in some cases. the regular person just to go into urban america and some mall and they should be defenseless. >> by the way, cori bush's private detail, they're supporters of the second amendment and advocates of it. and that's who she is hiring to protect her. the double play, the hypocrisy here is outrageous, and nobody even covers this story. well, i'm glad we had time to. >> laura: raymond, these people are definitely that work for them in the private security, they are not like soy boys or

pajama boys. they get it done. they are real security people and they are all for the second amendment. all right, raymond. thank you. all right, question: do you get the cents when you are traveling you see people traveling in masks, suddenly masks are coming back. how about more covid lockdowns? you think it can't happen? dr. jay bhattacharya has a reaction to that, next. ♪

bayou lhattacharya - i don't have any anxiety about money anymore. - great people. different people, that's for sure, and all of them had different reasons for getting a reverse mortgage, but you know what, they all felt the same about two things: they all loved their home, and they all wanted to stay in that home. - [announcer] if you're 62 or older and own your home, you could access your equity to improve your lifestyle. a reverse mortgage loan eliminates your monthly mortgage payments and puts tax-free cash in your pocket. call the number on your screen. - why don't you call aag... and find out what a reverse mortgage can mean for you? - [announcer] call right now to receive your free no-obligation info kit.

call the number on your screen.

>> that was a year ago. so, why is the white house telling americans to get yet another booster this does not prevent them from getting covid or transmitting it. there is another variant and another eg5. fl1 pon and ba286. things are changing. don't let your guard down. some colleges are requiring students to get the vaccine. in a school in georgia this weekend, it is bringing back the mask mandate that is not the only place. google mask mandate and see how this is gearing up. what this is about in again. efforts to limit your movement. a sense of panic and potential low set up more restrictions ahead of the 2024 election

cycle. could that be what is happening in joining mow is jay bhattacharya professor of medicine at stan ford, university >> doctor b. great to see you i'm looking at the scientific american piece just posted. the who is monitoring the ba286 variant that's in 4 different countries and 6 cases total? and they think we should observe this with caution and concernful your reaction to this? scientists have interest. i don't think it should fall to the public it panic there will be variants forever. covid is here forever we should not reorganize our societies that is a huge mistake. >> doctor bhattacharya the idea of requiring students to have an experimental shot.

that does in the prevent covid transmission or prevent you from getting covid; how does this make sense in any school or work place? >> you have been it never made sense. risk of dying or severe disease from covid for young people is very low. it would never made sense to mandate the vaccine for them since young men have myo card ice at high rates an option to require istrary to the principles of science. the colleges that do it i wonder about whether they teach science effectively if they can't evaluate this basic scientific idea >> scott got low is head of the fda on the board of pfizer. and he is continuing to urge people to get he's updated boost and vaccinations.

watch. >> we have to have humility around this virus there is a lot we don't understand and surprising us. this looks like tell be a flu like pair dime new variants each year and hopefully we will guess right with the vaccines you need to keep updated with the vaccine. >> every time he speaks should be sponsored by pfizer. i'm sorry. it is ridiculous that he is still on tv pushing this shot when we this afternoon it does not prevent transmission or prevent frugetting infectd and it is the same thing. nothing changes. unbelievable. >> i mean we don't know allow but it would be nice if pfizer produced a trial showing the new boosters work. before they told the public to take it i agree with you, laura. >> doctor bhattacharya you are clip in the your answer tonight i love that. someone must have told you to be 55y what is that curtain behind

you. i'm on patients i gotta -- in a -- all right as long as it is in the the bathroom. i'm kidding doctor bhattacharya thank you. a congratulations to our producer al and he cans his wife jillian on the birth of their baby leo. next. jessy. welcome to waters primetime. the president was never in business with his son >> new video evidence. proving that was a lie. >> where is the president? where -- where are we americans, too? >> president biden hawaii fires another cover up. >> you think joe biden is corrupt. >> a rambling fool >> primetime visits the iowa state