>> it really is amazing. there's some music here about he wrote about his wife. sozing. i would urge you tot go download it or get it wherever other things are sold. t wherevdid you need to plug so? >> no, i'm good. good. shut up, man. all righalkaileet kaylee. our sd thank you. jamie cat tigress, the studio here's laura. ♪ >> laura: he >> laura: hello, everyone, i'm laura ingraham. this is the "the ingraham angle" from washington tonight, thanks for being with us. president biden has finally arrived in maui. he said a few words ago about the damage from the wildfires and the government response. we'll monitor this and bring you breaking news. and so-called democracy, if trump wins, later in the show. the truth is coming out about hunter biden slowly, brut it is

coming. we know the only reason the justice department agreed to a plea deal is because his attorneys threatened to put joe on the stand. i guess putting the skreez on chinese business execs is not the only thing. according to politico, hunter biden's attorney chris clark, warned the doj, president biden would be a fact witness in any criminal trial. putting him on the stand against his own justice department could cause a constitutional crisis. doeses anyone think that joe biden somehow was not kept abreast of this? come on. if the threats hunter biden made in his what's app message, this is the intimidation tactic that joe biden would agree to. and as andy mccarthy pointed

out, it is another example of biden family corruption. >> you have big, bad justice department prosecutors, they got this guy on 10-year gun felony and tax evasion and they are afraid to charge him. they do not want to charge joe biden's son. this is what access to joe biden is. this is why people are willing to pay millions of dollars to get it. that is what the scheme was. >> everyone gets it, including hunter biden's attorneys. make sure you are protecting or enriching the family. they would have gotten away with this entire sweetheart deal if not for the pesky whistleblowers. new york am toos reporting weiss wasn't originally going to require a guilty plea on any of the charges. this is mind boggling.

his position changed when irs officials accuse the doj of hamstringing the investigation. what upon has when you get in the way of protecting the biden family like the whistleblowers? hunter biden's lawyers told the doj by disclosing to congress, the irs agents broke the law and they should be prosecuted. joining me now is attorney for whistleblower gary shapley, tristan levitt, with empower oversight. your reaction to that reporting, speci speci specific allegation that your client was breaking the law? >> last summer chris clark told prosecutors, before the threat to put joe biden was on the stand said it would be a career

killer. it is unfortunate and not a surprise at all, clearly has no gr grounding effect and the judge? delaware, noted that. the pleading from hunter legal team asked chairman jason smith amicus brief be removed from the docket. the judge smacked that down saying making broad allegations was irresponsible of them. >> laura: what is your clinton saying now that we know they wouldn't probably have asked for the guilty plea at all had they not come forward? imagine if they didn't come forward. what is his reaction been? >> couple key points when it comes to gary, knowing what was happening between the prosecutors and the defense

counsel assads new dimension. they were cut out of meetings with defense counsel. now we know about the interactions, the threat to have joe biden testify came at an penit mrnt time and that letter came on halloween in 2022. that letter came at a time when u.s. attorney david weiss was about to have the 2014 to 2015 tax charges, including felony for 2014 for making false reports on income tax about hiding poours income. those were about to exmire, statute of limitation temperature is not coincidence that we would put the president on the stand when he is making a decision about whether to let burisma charges go. that is significant. the other thing that stands out,

this more than anything demonstrates why there should have been a special counsel appointed from the outset of this investigation. it should have happened earlier. at that moment, they should have appointed him. >> laura: we discovered the president using pseudonyms to community, jrb, acronyms or pseudonyms to disguise his identity ychl do that if it is a friendly conversation between father and son? that gives more creedance to what this needed to be delved into by objective prosecutor with no political ties, none. >> absolutely. what you see instead looking at information that senator chuck grassley put out from unrelated

whistleblowers, when information about the fd 1023 from the fbi alleges burisma bribed hunter biden and joe biden, that being presented to delaware district attorney's office. the same attorney that received the allegations was telling investigators, you can't ask anything about the dad. this was hobbled from the beginning, people refused to see what was in front of their faces. >> laura: garland was saying weiss had comauthority, a wide berth in which to operate and that clearly is not the case. >> no question. what these articles revealed was something significant, less than five weeks after merrick garland swore to congress, in fact to senator grassley specifically weiss would not have any

interference by the justice departments, you see an official from the deputy attorney's office responded to inquiry from chris clark, who is trying to get anyone at doj to say where to go if weiss charged him. for a deputy official to set up a meeting andin jo the meeting with chris clark and david weiss clearly shows merrick garland testimony to cocaine was just not accurate. >> laura: great to see you, thanks so much. the doj tries to slow walk the hunter investigation, whatever form exists today, the house gop is not stopping. late today four new accept for irs and fbi officials who were present or had direct knowledge where david weiss allegedly claimed he was prevented from being tax crimes. joining me now is solwisenberg. we'll get to that in a moment. i want to address this other

issue and your reaction to hunter's attorney saying putting president biden on the stand would cause a constitutional crisis. what of that? >> it is an absolute joke. and would be considered an absolute joke by any responsible prosecutor. i would have kicked somebody out of my office that said that. to begin with, have they forgotten president william jefferson clinton testified in the white water trial. he was a defense witness, he testified. they made acommendations because he was president, no constitutional crisis here. that is number one. number two, that assumes joe biden would want to testify or whether or not a district judge would allow the defense to put him on, there would have to be

threshold of some relevancy temperature is a joke as an argument and bigger joke if any prosecutor in the department of justice took it seriously. >> laura: at this point, when we see this evidence that they would not have even asked hunter for a plea in this case, were it not for the whistleblowers coming forward, again, what is this tell you about the objective, any objective matter what this investigation was really like? >> it was, i was astounded to hear that. the prosecutors had stockholm syndrome. so many things about this case, i want to stress to viewers, so many things within the department of justice that are not how it is done. they are not by the book, they are not kosher. this is just one of them.

i can give you several examples. just the inconsistent statements by weiss since the story broke are appalling. first saying he did have the authority and then limiting that. the key thing he's never refuted, he never refuted or denied on the meeting may 22nd -- sorry may 7, 2022 meeting, he told irs criminal agents he did not have the authority to prosecute hunter biden and authority had been denied by the office, that is inconsistent with him saying he had authority and inconsistent with everything merrick garland said about the case. >> laura: evan perez had a comment about this, watch. >> politics, without a doubt,

injected into this situation and it has been clear. it shows there are some people involved in this investigation who were ready to end this. >> laura: sol, your reaction? >> well, of course that is true and the amazing thing, if ready to end it means kill it, i think that is true. the decision had been made by weiss in 2022 ultimately and by the department, the doj tax, there is enough to indict and you can indict and hunter's defense attorneys hear about it and go in and start lobbying and it is all over. he rolls them, really quite stunning. >> laura: bacari sellers was talking about comparison between

what is alleged against the biden family and donald trump and all the indictments coming forward. check this out. >> there is a whole lot of what about ism, when it comes to hunter biden. there is difference in multiple felony counts versus actions by this president's son. >> laura: yeah, trying to say there is just rumblings about biden's son and we have indictments piling up against trump that actually allege credible wrongdoing. neither, the other one is up here and the other is down there. >> well, the question is why isn't there an indictment against hunter biden? the reason is because of this political interference. i've never been impressed, he is engaging in what about ism and every case should be judged on its own merits.

let me tell you, the hunter biden investigation is major black mark on the doj, major scandal in doj history and there should have been, as i said from the beginning, a special counsel and this is the reason why i'm the only one apparently in america, they should resuscitate independent counsel statute, you need independence in this situation. >> laura: this is so wild on so many levels. we will bring you back tomorrow. thank you, sol. you will not believe what the latest suggestion from the left is on how to supposedly save our democracy. i thought this was a joke when someone sent it to me, but it was true. my "angle" explains next.

so, you've got the power of xfinity at home.

now take it outside with xfinity mobile. like speed? it's the fastest mobile service around. with the best price for two lines of unlimited. only $30 bucks a line per month. that's hundreds in savings a year when you wave bye to the other guys. all on the most reliable 5g network nationwide. you really shouldn't walk out the front door without it. switch today at xfinitymobile.com.

goli, taste your goals. >> laura: the democracy busters that's the focus of tonight's angle. all right. >> laura: the democracy busters, that is tonight's angle. heads we win, tales, we lose. on cycle. in other words, if biden wins, all will be well again in the world. democracy lives to see another day. but, if someone like trump ends

up winning meaning they win enough states to push him over 270 electoral votes it, means the whole system implodes. warning, blow hard alert. >> the consequences of losing any candidate losing to donald trump and then becoming the next president catastrophic for american democracy. >> if these people were to gain power again, then i really do think that only the second time in american history we would put our collective fate at risk. >> dereks associated with another trump presidency, like, say, the existential threat to our democracy. >> this is a close race. and i think this is the danger for those that actually believe in democracy and want to preserve it. >> laura: oh, i get it. democracy only works going forward if they can get enough mail in ballots returned and early votes cast to swamp the populist. giving the win to the

octogenarian who cannot find his way off the stage. that is a very con ventricle yens yent way of approaching things. is it not? now, they are obviously freaking out and they are resorting to strained legal arguments even fringe theories turn constitution into silly putty to stretch into any way you want. scholars are trying to argue that trump should be barred, constitutionally barred from running for office. now, this is patently absurd, especially coming from judges who once called themselves originalist like our own friend mike luttig. i want you to remember that they strenuously argued that trump's team was guilty of wildly distorting the constitution regarding challenges to the state counts and the establishing of alternate slate of electors, watch. >> the people that that wrote

the 14th amendment were not fools. they realized if those people who try to overturn the country, who try to get rid of our peaceful transitions of power are, again, put in power, that would be the end of the nation. the end of democracy. >> all officials, federal and state, who have a responsibility to put on the ballot candidates for the presidency of the united states for instance, they, himself or herself are obligated under the constitution to determine whether donald trump qualifies to be put on the ballot. >> laura: what? try to follow that. now, again, they accused trump of pulling apart the constitution after the election. and you can argue about what trump did. but what are they doing? and to think by the way he was

once considered supreme court material during the bush administration. what a total disgrace. and it pains me to say that. they ever terrified that the people are going to reject both biden and them and their illogical views. and, of course, you can always count on academia to give birth to the most radical proposals. the protect teres of our cherished. grant wants to abolish elections all together writing the ancient greeks democracy. selected through certain tuition, a random lottery from a pool of candidates. in the united states we use a version of the lottery to selected jurors. what if we did the same with mayors, governors, legislators, justices and even presidents? okay. well, before you just write this off completely and did i get a good chuckle out of it, remember this the gender fluidity movement, the trans movement.

crt, those fringe theories were also born in the universities as well. so once again, the democrat's finger of accusation is always pointed back at them. they accuse trump and if it wasn't trump it would be someone elms of undermining democracy, committing felonies because he challenged the election results. yet, we have already documented this. you know, they have challenged repeatedly challenged election results. and when they do it, they say it's just part of the democratic process. so the bottom line is, democrats just simply don't much like or trust you, the voters. they think you're stupid. but you're not. you see what works and what doesn't work. what prosperity is and what it's not. you know when the border is secure and when it's open. and you know that elections should be determined by the voters. certainly not controlled by big

donors or big tech orbiter academics desperate for attention. that's democracy. and that's the angle. all right. coming up, the biden administration is already giving ukraine money for as long as it takes. but what communist regime is trying to cash in on the u.s. bailout as well? bob lighthizer former ustr for trump is he here next to explain.

attention... are you suffering from hearing loss? the fda has finally approved hearing aids to be sold over the counter. and now, rca, introduces their revolutionary otc hearing aids... starting as low as $99. delivered, free...right to your door. they're affordable, they're not the cost people associate with hearing aids or hearing devices. the old fashioned hearing aids were a serious hassle. my old fashioned ones cost me $5,000 and these actually work better. the rca hearing aids are more than $5,000 less. act now and reclaim the joy of hearing with rca otc hearing aids.

from as low as $99. you will not find hearing aids of this quality at this price anywhere. the first moment i received my hearing aids from rca, i popped them in my ear, and it was like bam, i could hear everything! you know rca. the quality is there. you got a company behind it that is the leader in the industry in sound. with completely adjustable volume, built in. simply slip on rca's rechargeable otc hearing aids and instantly hear your world again! i love you. never miss a moment again. after you get your hearing aids you realize how much you were missing, you know. i can't wait to get home and hear my grandkids playing. no more missed moments. that's right. don't wait any longer to finally hear what you've been missing. no doctors. no tools required, and no batteries to fumble with! it's not worth waiting. oh my gosh if i had only known, i would have gotten these years ago. you cleared up decades of frustration in a second.

i hate that i waited this long. order now for the low introductory price of just $99. you get a carrying case and accessory kit, plus free shipping. add a second hearing aid and we'll include a bonus deluxe charging cradle free! order now...call this number, or visit rcahearingaids.com

shipstation saves us so much time it makes it really easy and seamless pick an order print everything you need slap the label on ito the box and it's ready to go our cost for shipping, were cut in half just like that go to shipstation/tv and get 2 months free

♪ >> laura: now, one question the voters are going to need to think about in 2024 is hardly ever discussed. why are the democrats and the corporate types so obsessed with helping communists? what do you mean, laura? well, you probably heard with some of the major financial problems now facing china. they have a debt crisis. they have a housing crisis. of course, they have a birth rate crisis. they have a skyrocketing youth unemployment. they have flagging g.d.p. growth, even though they lie

about that all the time and they have slowing exports. now, none of this is our problem. this was all self-inflicted damage china and ccp did for itself. at a time when americans are living paycheck to paycheck. we at the angle sense a building momentum for the support of some kind of taxpayer bailout or some assistance or some softening toward china, maybe removing tarves gradually in order to help them through this period as american seeing opportunity for u.s. growth? be careful what you wish for warned obama secretary hank powellson. the effect would ripple around the world economically and geopolitically. instantaneous repercussions could be felt in worldwide capital markets. well, just fast forward a little bit. any type of handout any bailout

a few things, gift to the ccp for all their bad behavior and gift to pollute democrats worldwide. three, a slap in the face of the american middle class as well it. would also be a complete act of self-sabotage for the united states. did would kind of be like giving a loaded gun to a man threatening to kill you when his own gun jams. we never helped the former soviet union when it began to falter and that was the right call. but, of course, the difference now is that america stupidly tethered itself to china by off-shoring everything from manufacturing in medicines to electronics, ultimately ceding the market to most powerful adversary it was very, very stupid. all the reason now we need to seriously begin decoupling from china. the trump tariffs, most of them are still in place. microchip restrictions are already being felt in china. that's good. it's an evil and a corrupt

regime it is hell bent on eclipsing the u.s. militarily and economically. and ultimately the goal is to, of course, vanquish democracy itself. we should not give them a penny in economic aid. not one penny. but help is precisely what they are going to be asking for this week when gina roman dough arrives and they know that she will probably lend a friendly ear at a high level we need to do business with china wherever we can we need to promote wherever we can there is no national security risk to the united states coffee and health and beauty aids to china. >> laura: this is not a serious person. i don't know should we have done cosmetic business with the former soviet union late 70s and early 80's? our massive trade deficit is not going to be evened out by exports of mascara and

starbucks, sweetheart let's not forget she is the latest in the parade of top biden officials who traveled to beijing to help massage the relationship. of course, we had the climate czar john kerry. then it was tony blinken. and then not to be left out treasury secretary janet yellen. all of them did nothing but embarrass us there and just to give you an idea. if they are all in to reducing their carbon footprints, then why not just hold the next cabinet meeting for the biden administration in beijing. after all, they all seem more comfortable answering to the chinese than to the american people at this point joining me now is bob light houser. former trait representative under president trump. just days ago president biden said we are not looking for a fight with china. we are looking for a rational relationship your reaction?

first of all it's important what you do an adversary china is they want to be number one in the world. they have the biggest army, the biggest navy. they are militarizing the south china sea we have had to u.s. sailors arrested for espionage for china. they have had warships off alaska. you have got to remind yourself, first, what we are dealing with and you do that so well secondly, we have to remind ourselves they have been waging an economic war against the united states for at least the last two decades. probably the last three or four, and they have been winning so the notion that we should do anything to help them out is really beyond ridiculous. one we have to protect our

technology transferring our wealth. the wealth of our children and our grandchildren to china they are using it to build an army and navy and technology it. makes literally no sense at all. we act like imports from china are good things. imports from china create wealth for china. it is -- in the first place. in the second place, i don't know how serious their economic problems are. but, whatever they are, they are their problems. they be not our problems. and the notion that we should have more trade, which really means a bigger trade deficit with china to help them out is madness. you know, let me just make one last point. their economy -- their economy has grown 10 fold in the last 20 years. almost all of that growth or a good part of it is wealth transfer trillions of dollars of wealth transfer and technology theft from the united states. so, i mean, look it, they can

handle their own problems. whatever the heck they want. what we need to do is to start strategic decoupling. get back to balanced trade. we'll sell them their cosmetics and we will buy the same amount from them that they sell to us. not three or times as much. then we have got to protect our technology. >> laura: bob, what do you think about the states having to step in to say no more land purchases in texas or in north dakota or the federal government doesn't seem to have a problem with this. i don't think american citizens can go to china and buy land certainly not military bases correct, bob. >> they can't buy it anywhere and they can't lease it without government approval. it is crazy. i'm glad the states are doing it. it's clearly a federal responsibility. and you look at things like tiktok. there ought to be a vote tomorrow morning just to ban that in the congress. there is no upside to that. and nothing but downside. it is sort of amazing how lax

particularly the current crowd has been on taking on this lethal threat. >> now, bob, do you think that in -- heaven forbid a second biden term, that's hard for knee even say that, that a bailout -- we call it a bailout or help or assistance, you could see them justifying oh, let's remove some of the tariffs that you are great work at ustr as strayed rep, you put in place. i see them appealing those tariffs back. do you agree with me. i don't know what it is, but i can translate it into chinese. it means surrender we ought to be increasing the tariffs enough to balance trade. >> laura: bob, i really appreciate your wisdom tonight of all nights. thank you so much. earlier i said hank paulson was

obama's treasury sect i meant bush but on a lot of things the same thing. unseeming move to border and defy congress and political reality am bushes the. raymon "seen and urn seen is next.

(dr. king) if you have diabetes, getting on dexcom is the single most important thing you can do. and it's covered by medicare. before using the dexcom g7, i was really frustrated. my a1c was stuck. (female announcer) dexcom g7 sends your glucose numbers to your phone

or receiver without painful fingersticks so you can make better decisions in the moment. so easy to use, and my a1c has never been lower. (female announcer) now, more people than ever are covered by medicare. call now to get started.

>> laura: time for seen and unseen segment. we expose the stories behind the headlines. for that we turn to fox news contributor raymond arroyo. all right, raymond, do you remember when joe biden said this? >> how do you think things are going at the border, sir? >> much better than you all expected. ha ha ha ha. >> laura: sort of gives you the, what? [laughter] >> i love how he is laughing. it makes you feel that he is on to something that you don't quite know, laura. it turns out we might be right. that democrat controlled senate passed the defense bill that requires the completion of the border wall. using materials rusting along the southern border since the trump administration. you'll remember, we showed our audience much of that from the sky. but, as the house considers the bill, the biden administration has been quietly selling off those raw materials at auction. talk about unseen.

they have unloaded more than half of the $300 million worth of border wall parts for pennies on the dollar, laura. i think this is called defying congress or undermining democracy as you mentioned earlier in the show. >> laura: maybe we should -- since we are giving everything away to ukraine, maybe we should just send the border wall over there and they can drop it on the russian troops. continue i mean, it's just -- you don't expect anything to go right for these people. it's just insanity. >> that may be the only way to get that border wall built. and i love. this i just found this out today. biden spent $2 billion on storage for these parts that he is selling for pennies. this is really disgusting. but, laura, i want to turn to politics for a moment. at the big g.o.p. debate on wednesday, msnbc's the g.o.p. candidates to go after donald trump, hard. >> if they don't go after donald trump, then they are not really

debating. >> they are either running for vice president or they are hoping that he disappears in a legal fog. none of these people are going up on the stage wednesday to offer americans something different. >> laura: what? >> this is absurd. they are offering something different from joe biden. i love how msnbc, that has been hoping and praying that trump disappears into a legal fog, is now chastising others for helping he disappears into a legal fog. whatever the case, there is a lot of smoke being blown at msnbc. i don't think you can take any of these seriously. >> laura: i think ronna mcdaniel and all of the candaof thecandidates should tay time an msnbc panel comes up. when you hear them speak, take notes because they have your best interest at heart. right, just do the opposite and you will do fine. meanwhile over at cnn, mild panic has begun to set in, laura, as they encounter polls

showing biden and trump neck and neck within the margin of error. oh. look at these. >> one point. one point, if you go back at where we were at this point four years ago, joe biden's lead was high single digits to low double digits. so this idea that donald trump can't win the general election. i want you to lose that idea. donald trump is polling better right now than basically at any pointed during the entire 2020. >> that's fascinating. >> that's fascinating. that's stomach turning for them. >> faces, laura. they are like that's fascinating, oh, very interesting. >> let's go on to lady gaga story. let's go on what happened with taylor swift at that wedding over the weekend. they were just swarming her. >> exactly. you know, laura, i was looking at this over the weekend. cbs news may be way ahead of the curve. they dropped what could be the biggest story of the year and if

you notice, cbs posted this tweet friday. read it closely. former president joe biden holds news conference. talk about a scoop, laura. they issued a correction. but we will be watching for a follow-up on this breaking news story. former president joe biden, imagine that. cbs of all people. >> laura: that's one of the good moments. i love that. okay. finally, it was revealed this week while the squad was urging everybody to defund the police and trying to limit second amendment rights. guess who spent $1.2 million in campaign dollars on private security? cori bush spent more than 736,000. aoc nearly 273,000. your friend ilhan omar 125,000. and all of this on top of the taxpayer funded security detail each of them enjoys from the

capitol police. this is rich watching this -- these numbers come out and, by the way, this is all federal election commission figures that the "new york post" got their hands on this. is disgraceful. >> laura: but, remember, regular people shouldn't be able to defend themselves, right? they shouldn't be able to like carry concealed or anything. they are fine because they have private security to the tune of several hundred thousand dollars in some cases. the regular person just to go into urban america and some mall and they should be defenseless. >> by the way, cori bush's private detail, they're supporters of the second amendment and advocates of it. and that's who she is hiring to protect her. the double play, the hypocrisy here is outrageous, and nobody even covers this story. well, i'm glad we had time to. >> laura: raymond, these people are definitely that work for them in the private security, they are not like soy boys or

pajama boys. they get it done. they are real security people and they are all for the second amendment. all right, raymond. thank you. all right, question: do you get the cents when you are traveling you see people traveling in masks, suddenly masks are coming back. how about more covid lockdowns? you think it can't happen? dr. jay bhattacharya has a reaction t to that next.

>> is the pandemic over? >> the pandemic is over. no one is wearing masks, everyone is in good shape. >> laura: that was a year ago, why is the white house telling americans to get yet another booster shot that doesn't prevent them from getting covid. there is another variant and another one and another one. things are changing. don't let your guard down. some colleges still require kids to get the vaccine before coming back on campus. one school in georgia announced it is bringing back the mask mandate. google mask mandate is happening and what this is all really about, again, efforts to limit your movement, give people a sense of panic and set up more

restrictions ahead of the 2024 election. joining me is dr. jay bhattacharya. great to see you. looking at this scientific american piece that just posted and the who is monitoring ba286, that is in four different countries, six cases total. they think we should observe this with great caution and concern. your reaction? >> scientists should observe it with interest, it should not fall to the public. covid is here forever, we should not reorganize society around prevention of covid. >> laura: dr. bhattacharya, idea of requiring students to have an

experimental shot that does not prevent covid transmission, how does that make any sense in any work place? >> it never made any sense, especially since risk of dying for young people is very, very low. it would never have made sense to mandate the vaccine for them. young men seem to have myocarditis. it is basic principles of science and colleges doing it, they could teach science effectively. >> laura: we have scott gotliebb, on the board of pfizer, urging people to get

boosters and vaccinations, watch. we have to have humility. it continues to surprise us. it looks like a flu-like paradigm. new variants will come up every year, you will need to keep up to date with your vaccine. >> laura: every time he speaks, it should be sponsored by pfizer. it is ridiculous he is on tv pushing this shot when we know it doesn't prevent transmission or infection. same thing, nothing changes. unbelievable. >> we don't know a lot, it be nice if pfizer would show a trial that shows the booster does work. i agree, laura. >> laura: you are very clipped in your answers tonight, someone must have told you to be 55y.

where are you tonight? looks like the bathroom. i'm on vacation. >> laura: as long as it is not the bathroom. i'm just kidding. congratulations to our producer alex and jailian on the birth much their baby boy leo. up in next, jesse. 8 candidates officially qualifying for a spot on the first republican presidential primary stage tomorrow night. >> they are on the wall and they are going to be in your ear. taking the podium will be a former new jersey governor chris christie, florida governor ron desantis. former u.n. ambassador nikki haley bay former arkansas governor asa hutchinson bay former vice president mike pence. tech entrepreneur vivek ramaswam