hello, colonial penn? >> greg: we're out of time, thanks to kennedy, brett velicovich, kat timpf, tyrus, our studio ingraham. this the ingraham angle tonight. thanks for watching us. fallout from figure head. that he was the focus of tonight's angle. >> back in the spring of 2020 it was clear to us that biden would be a hologram candidate conveniently helped by covid and the d.c. press corps and the angle told you what the real dynamic would be if biden actually won the presidency. >> he's just going to be a figure head president americans

won't be voting for a man articulate a serious policy agenda let alone defend it. they will be voting for the party machine's geriatric puppet. >> laura: now if you didn't believe me then, you should now. it's a cynical crew hoax the democrats are playing on america. because, from day one, joe biden has been president in name only. our enemies know it and israelis in july they are cringing. >> we brought israelis and palestinians together at a political level and they -- and -- and the -- and -- >> laura: we need a translation to buy a vowel or something. people often ask me who is really in charge at the white house, laura? is it obama? goldman sachs? big tech, the donors? i would say who knows but it ain't this guy. >> nearly 13,500,000 jobs just since you got me sworn in no --

in january of 2020. >> our secretary of the defense austin said -- secretary austin, secretary mcdid you knowna, the army, the secretary of the army warm, senator and where is senator -- oh, senator blackburn. >> laura: i thought it was senator blah for a moment. so aren't the democrats embarrassed? why do we stick with this guy? because he has wrecked everything he has touched migrants are from open border overrunning other situations. >> most americans are $400 unexpected expense away from bankruptcy. >> laura: is that a selling point for bidenomics by the way? what a great vice president she is. no wonder biden's numbers are horrible. check out the most recent gallup poll only 37% somewhat or strongly approve of his handling of the economy. but we have to remember biden the figure head, he is a perfect

president for the globalist democrats. why is that? because he will never give the establishment any pushback not against the open border wages low, not against energy prices certainly not against the ukraine policy and certainly not against the trans insanity. that's how they like him, compliant. but the voters, we found some of stuff they don't agree new poll 73% of all voters, including two thirds of the democrat believe that biden is too old for another term. two thirds of democrats what is amazing the dictatorship of the elites. the democratic elites who hold high office raise the money and pound the campaign message that they're all in when it comes to president joe biden's re-election in other words what

democrat voters think or what they want is not relevant to the party establishment. they readily concede that they hear doubts about whether biden is up to the job. their response? get over it. get over it? that's how they treat their own voters no. wonder the entire country is such a mess. there is zero hesitation about running over their base if that means in the end that we have higher energy costs, that we have an open border, that we have endless deficit spending. those things, by the way, are not accidents. those are the actual policies, keep the standard of living low. control the people the problem of lowing the standard of living and fossil fuels they are actually hurting the voters that they desperately need to turn out to vote. as the "new york times" was forced to acknowledge today noting a marked deterioration in mr. biden's support among registered nonwhite voters

compared to 2020. it's startling. but, again, the people pulling biden's levers seem to be oblivious about this. for then, it's full steam ahead it's biden or bust. there at least one democrat in office who is not afraid to speak the truth he is from minnesota congressman dean phillips. >> my call is for the president to pass the torch. i think that would be in the country's best interest and certainly democrats. i'm worried about the five or six swing states, the battle grounds that are the most consequential i have called for some of the moderate governors, people representing those very states to consider entering as alternatives. >> laura: now, phillips himself considered a run for about five minutes but many saw what was coming down the track with him if he did so. let's face it, all of them are scared to take on the party establishment. look at what they have already done to their once celebrated liberals. >> i think it's mad for the left to vote for cornel west when

fascism is at the door. i think there is something wrong with bobby kennedy jr. >> this is a very dangerous guy with a very storied name that is casting a dark shadow. >> i don't consider marianne williamson to be much of a threat. best way to handle her is not to address her at all. >> laura: how convenient the party free debate. what is perhaps the most pathetic development in the long weekend at bidens is how the media have become nothing more than establishment appear rat chicks. pummeling the guy with growing minority support trump who takes on his own party's old guard and props up the man protected by the pollute democrats who can't be trusted to find his way off the stage. >> some people may be disappointed with joe biden but they will find him more acceptable than donald trump. if donald trump has a ceiling beyond which he cannot grow where at biden at least has the potential of bringing people back home. >> laura: whoa, whoa, peter baker once really respected reporter at the "new york

times." does he not read the polls about minority voters abandoning the democratic party? now the fact is so-called journalist love the democratic dictatorship themselves. that's actually keeping biden right where he is. they like it for the same reason. the same reason they love mail-in ballots. ballot harvesting, proposal for online voting even. and the lockdowns they don't love the voters not even their own. >> we the voters have to destroy the republican party in order to save it. this is a chaotic, in many ways, authoritarian kind of aglom member ration that's not really an organized political party doesn't have coherent philosophy or governing program except tear it down. >> laura: gene, tear what down? a vibrant economy?

immigration enforcement. our history? no, that's what the forces behind biden did and are still doing. that's the fallout from a figure head presidency and it's all according to plan, whether you like it or not. and that's the angle. joining me now mollie hemingway editor and economy at the central federalist and ben domenech both fox news contributors. marty, they act like the republicans are the fascists when they are the ones who are married to these plutocrats who are exercising, it appears to be, all the party within the party regardless of what the people want. >> you also hear the consensus in washington, d.c. is that republicans very divide. they are not divided they are unified on policy at least the voters. the democrat elite the ruling regime and their voters, they have strong division. the democrat leaders having someone like joe biden he is able to implement all of their goals. the beam who run the agencies are -- who are very radical to

be honest they get to implement all of what they want. they are losing these voters. losing not just white working class voters but also black working class voters and it's a real opportunity here. >> laura: kjp was asked about this problem that the democrat voters have with biden today about his age and so forth. this is what she said. >> look, here's what i know. here's what i can speak to. i can speak to that a president who has wisdom. i can speak to a president who has experience. i can speak to a president who has done historic -- has taken historic action and has delivered in historic pieces of legislation. and that's important. >> laura: exploding budget deficit we just learned about, inflation is back. >> i love that kjp had to read that list. >> laura: she did have to read can you memorize that? >> the real problem they are facing right now is that joe biden's numbers among working class voters, noncollege

educated voters are now looking more and more similar to democrat numbers among white working class noncollege voters that's something very dangerous for them. the reason it hurts them for particular areas in our political map and ways impossible to recover from. if your coalition becomes a bunch of white elites and college kids, then you're not going to be able to have the kind of coalition that joe biden was able to form in the past usual not going to be able to see the down ballot results need to hold things like the senate. they are losing working class, hispanic, black and working class voters in a way it should be stunning to the party elites and the "new york times" admitting that tells you how far gone this is. >> laura: that was wild. mollie, i think this owns the door in such a wide way for the republicans to walk right through and said this is what they have done to your cities, your schools your country. is this the horse you want to

ride in for another four years that's a huge opening. >> to that end in 2020. you have a campaign where joe biden was able to have the media help him across the finish line. he has a track record and voters are saying they are not particularly pleased with that there was that recent "wall street journal" poll that showed that voters give trump presidency much higher marks in terms of what was accomplished than the biden presidency. they think trump has a vision for the future that biden just doesn't have. so those policies that people liked under the trump administration which you see so many people -- so many republican politicians adopting, they do provide a huge opportunity. >> laura: it's like the republicans are sticking with mcconnell and the republican elite. and the establishment on the democrat party they have a death grip on biden. they will not let him go, even if he wanted t gsz e may, 41 illegal

immigrants now housed here at the roosevelt hotel by the city of new york courtesy of the taxpayers have been arrested here. the violence has broken out. a lot of domestic violence here. but there have been other offenses. officers hit over the head with parking signs. employees struck. this is apparently a reoccurring theme they roosevelt. you will notice these scooters, mope heads, they have strewn the streets on all sides of the roosevelt but they have no licenses. if you look at the back, there is no licenses on these vehicles. they are all unregistered. now, what are they here for?

how do they get brand new mope heads and motorcycles? i'm told by authorities part of this is the migrants deliver food, some deliver weed, and some deliver other migrants all over town. i spoke to some of the locals here about the impact of having this migrant shelter in the middle of manhattan is 46th street and madison and how it's affected their lives and their businesses. >> you are right next door to the roosevelt hotel. what impact has this had for your business, traffic et cetera? >> actually, it's really disgusting because every day i have to come out about three or four times or even 10 times to talk to the people. because it looks like midtown. doesn't know the meaning of this area. so at times see them touching the glasses, playing with the glasses. it's really affected the business. >> laura, this is not going to stop. these immigrants continue to come. this is, if you will, the

loading dock for the roosevelt hotel, receiving, this is where immigrants come by the bus loads they get processed on the corner and move into shelters like this. they are going to keep coming. because new york city has a huge lure out to these illegal immigrants. that would be their right to shelter law. >> everyone in new york city is entitled to a roof over their head. i will have a full report tomorrow. back to you, laura. >> laura: all right, ray. thank you, the scooters i thought i had seen it all. forget about party car crashers. gate crashers. new report on how chinese flacials trying to make their way, no big deal on to our military bases. colby is here with reaction to that and a lot we, the moms who have lost our children to social media harms. we, we, we have had... enough. our politicians have failed. working for lobbyists, not us. we need your voice to pass the kids online safety act

this fall. join us. join us. join us. join us. ♪ let's lead the way.

every business that's why comcast business de is launching theal. mobile made free event. with our business internet, new and existing customers can

get one year of unlimited mobile for free. it's our best internet. powered by the next generation 10g network and with 99.9% reliability. plus one line of free mobile for an entire year. it's the mobile made free event-happening now. get started for just $49.99 a month. plus, ask how to get one free line of unlimited mobile. comcast business, powering possibilities. here's why you should switch fo to duckduckgo on all your devie duckduckgo comes with a built n engine like google, but it's pi and doesn't spy on your searchs and duckduckgo lets you browse like chrome, but it blocks cooi and creepy ads that follow youa from google and other companie. and there's no catch, it's fre. we make money from ads, but they don't follow you aroud join the millions of people taking back their privacy by downloading duckduckgo on all your devices today. every day, businesses everywhere are asking: join the millions of people takinis it possible?ivacy with comcast business... it is.

is it possible to use predictive monitoring to address operations issues? we can help with that. can we provide health care virtually anywhere? we can help with that, too. is it possible to survey foot traffic across all of our locations? yeah! absolutely. with the advanced connectivity and intelligence of global secure networking from comcast business. it's not just possible. it's happening. other sensitive sites in the u.s. 100 times. u.s. officials call it espionage designed to practice military installation and other federal sites. why should anyone be surprised

by this? it would be like being surprised that a stranger walks in the front door when you leave the keys in the lock. joining me is founder and ceo of strategy risk. chinese nationals were found crossing into a u.s. missile range in new mexico and scuba di divers rocket launch site. you have been a tourist, i've been a tourist, do you ever go in murky water? >> no, look, this reminds me what japanese were doing before pearl harsh osh and we should take it at face value. we have seen the balloon, cyber intrusions, intelligence officials are saying this is a huge unprecedented intelligence

value. they are hoovering up what they can get at military facilities and bases and preparing for conflict and xi jinping is remaining resolute. >> the pentagon told us in a small number of incidents someone obtained access by speeding through security check points. they are cited criminally, banned from future access and escorted off base. they have controlled turnarounds daily, but none of them indicate espionage. should any of us feel placated or reassured by these explanationings? >> i would say yes, having lived in china, it is quite wonderful

how open america is. we have to have a national debate as tensions rise with china and bridge and i are in agreement on how bad things are getting, whether or not america wants to close down, wants to manage things more tightly or wants to say listen, we're an open and free country and espionage will happen and a lot of chinese are going to be part of the problem and how do we deal with that in an american way? >> you are pretty laz e faire br it. i lived in the soviet union and we didn't have the openness with the soviet union. we should not invite the foxes into the hen house. >> we don't want to closed into

a closed society and replicate what the people's republic is. in order to protect our open society, we need to be tough and protect secrets that are critical for security. more than anything else, missile facility, submarine bases and we can't have foreign nationals poking around there. >> do you think we should have more than 350,000 students in the united states? should we go for a half million or million, bring in more? >> fascinating question. >> that is why i asked it. cute turn-about, that is why i asked the question. >> i think we should have more international students from other parts of the world. india is underrepresented, vietnam. it is sad we can't go study

china anymore. knowing your enemy or friend is incredibly important. there is a major problem with chinese students and espionage, mostly them spying on other chooirn chineseun stereos. having a concrete debate about this, it is hard to know if i think more or fewer, i think more honest reckoning. >> laura: here is the problem we have, there is no reciprocity. smattering of american students studying in china, but they are not given freedom to move, they are not moving about unsurveilled. we are not allowed to buy big tracts of land in china. they have a different idea. why should we allow china to buy land near military bases, that

is why eight states are moving to prohibit that. >> i do think we can all agree reciprocity has to be order. they are shutting down companies, serious intelligence information on china economic. how can we be sure we are making reliable investments? officials are going over there. and they are not coming back and visiting the united states. >> laura: this is -- you are too academic, bottom line, we sent four top officials to china to prostrate themselves with the chinese after the balloon incident. they go visit disneyland, this is a quad box, i love this. what did we get as a result?

chinese mouthpiece said we are not moved by your empty gestures of language and so forth. they are kind of laughing at us, see what we're doing as sign of weakness. they are nationally focused as they grow and expand, they are not wowed by our visit at all. you can close it out. if was mistake to send four people in a row and let kissinger go. >> laura: we love all people, but dictatorship is dictatorships. great to have you on. the lead advocate of democrats russia hoax latched themselves

to his next ruse. jonathan turley will react to that next.

>> laura: warning a alert. >> >> the 14th amendment is clear, it doesn't require you be -- a. it's a disqualification from holding office again. and it fits donald trump to a t by the clear terms of the 14th amendment he should be gawflted from holding office. >> laura: told you they were going to pull out all the stops. that means by any means necessary you have got to dump trump even if it means obliterating the actual words and meaning of the actual constitution. as i said in the angle the democrats know that their own base, it doesn't want biden. they want another alternative to run. they see biden's slagging poll

numbers the party elites do not trust their own voters. >> under the 14th amendment he is not even allowed to run even though he hasn't been convicted yet. >> instead of concentrating so much on the indictments, i mean i'm very excited about them myself, i definitely think 14th amendment all the way just prevent him from running. >> okay. >> laura: she is a renowned constitutional scholar. joining me now jonathan turley professor of law george washington university and fox news contributor. professor, does getting left leaning state attorneys general as adam schiff was referring to, getting them involved here, does that give this wacky 14th amendment strategy any more heft or credibility? >> i don't think it does. you know, there are academics that have thought about this seriously and have supported this theory. i think it's the most dangerous theory that has emerged in decades. i think it's entirely

unsupported by the text and the history of the 14th amendment. this provision was written after the civil war of an actual rebellion where hundreds of thousands of people died. there was an army on the other side. they had their own foreign policy. that's a rebellion. now, that doesn't necessarily mean that it can't be used for anything that isn't of that magnitude, but it is notable that trump has not been charged even with incitement, let alone rebellion or insurrection. yet, they say that this doesn't even require an act of congress that any judge can simply announce that he was supporting an insurrection and that he, therefore, disqualified and voters will not get the choice of whether to vote for him or not. that's what makes this so dangerous. i don't think this will withstand review. they could end up getting a couple of judges to go with them. but, in the long run, i think it will be rejected. that's why i'm eager for them to take it to court so we could

finally put this on the road and see if they can take -- you know, get this off the ground. i don't think it will. >> laura: i can imagine what justice alito and a few of the others would say about this. i mean, talk about anti-democratic. this is the ultimate anti-democratic move that you could think about. like it doesn't matter what the people want. whoever the nominee is, if they want trump, if it wasn't trump, you know, desantis would be, you know, they try to charge him with kidnapping the migrants and sending them to, you know, massachusetts or, you know, california. i mean, you can see that this would -- could go in a lot of different directions, none of them good. >> no, i mean, this is comforting tale to tell liberal children at night so they can sleep restfully, you know, donald trump will not be on the ballot. but he will be on the ballot. the thing is this thing was written after the vice president of the confederacy showed up in congress to retake his oath. and people were just a bit

peeved about that. because he had taken that oath before we have all have disagreement what january 6th was. it was a horrible day. a desis he scration of our constitutional system. in my view. and in the view of a majority of people polled, it was a protest that became riot. i don't believe it was technically a insurrection. should we have a system where any judge can just takes a riot like that and say well, in my view it was an insurrection you aided and abetted it by not responding fast enough using rhetoric that was inflammatory. that is a very dangerous theory and it would be replicated over and over again if we allow it to be accepted. >> laura: to that point, jonathan, arizona's secretary of state let slip what an important detail about the broader

implications of this 1st amendment strategy. watch this. >> section 36 the 14th amendment is a radical and sweeping proposition. this isn't just about one person and one office. >> um-huh. >> this is about everyone who is running for any office in the united states of america. >> laura: so, look, if they can use this against trump, what stops them from finding that someone else supported, you know, refresh your recollection -- insurrection that wasn't an insurrection? so you can see where this would continue to leapfrog against other potential races. >> that's right. and the ambiguity within this theory is quite maddening. if trump had asked people to come back an hour earlier, would that have been not an insurrection? if he had mentioned go there peacefully three more times, would that have made the difference? we need a bright line rule. raskin and democrats tried to

stop the certification 2016. there were violent riots in washington, d.c. against his inauguration. they had no grounds for that there were no grounds in earliey stenks fights by democrats. does that mean they were involved in some rebellion or insurrection. no it doesn't. we have to some v. some type of bright line rule that guarantees that the voters can make on these questions i'm not saying people can read this as insurrection as opposed to a riot. you have to ask yourself is this what you want replicated for the future? i don't think it is. >> laura: there were a lot of things happening after the killing of george floyd that were really scary in the country and chaos was breaking out. people could make all sorts of findings of fact about that in different circumstances as well. professor, wonderful to see you. thank you. alex murdaugh's attorneys are now demanding a second trial based on newly discovered

evidence. martha mccallum is here with all the details, next. ♪

ow! uh oh. you, ok? no... i mean yeah. -just hit my melon. -yikes! should we see a doctor? i can't tell a doctor i slipped on a toy. i'm a triathlete! i had a concussion. most happen doing ordinary things. sometimes the tough thing to do is to get help to prevent serious damage. i like your sensitive side.

don't mess with your melon. if you hit it, get it checked.

goli, taste your goals. ♪ >> the state vs. richard alexander murdaugh, defendant. indictment for murder, sc code

16-3-0010, cdr code 0116, verdict, guilty. >> laura: now the nation was rivetted by the story for all the reasons you would expect. the prominent southern family, two murders, big money, drugs, and, of course, mystery. alex murdaugh placed at the scene of his wife and son's killing by an audio recording from his dead son's phone. but now murdaugh's attorneys say that he deserves a new trial because of jury tampering allegedly by the clerk that you just heard reading the verdict. >> that the clerk of court would go in to the sanctity of the jury room before he testified and tell the jurors don't be fooled by his testimony, watch out for his body language, and if that is true, which we have every reason to believe that it is, and no reason to believe that it's not, there is no choice but the courts to grant a new trial. >> laura: joining me now martha mccallum editor and executive

editor of "the story." she just spoke with murdaugh's surviving son buster for new fox nation series "the fall of the house of murdaugh" available now on fox nation. all right, martha, this is wild. what else did murdaugh's attorneys claim that this clerk did? i know there was a facebook reference and juror 630. i'm devouring all this information but tell us. >> martha: yeah, we always knew that dick hoorpt and jim griffin were going to appeal this case, laura, they said that as soon as it was over. we thought it would be along the lines of the judge allowing all these financial improprieties to be part of this murder case. but what we got today was something completely different. it was based on becky hill's book. she released a book of her inside story of this case. she really became kind of a character in this whole case and the narrative of it. so she released this book and it talked a lot about what happened behind the scenes. and that gave harpootlian and

griffin an open door so they started going through that door based on things that she said, like this, for example. we all remember, laura, when they went to the scene of the crime right before they started deliberating. she says when all of us at the -- from the courthouse, law enforcement or the jury went to moselle, we had an epiphany and we shared our thoughts with our eyes. at that moment, any of us standing there knew, i knew and they knew that alex was guilty. okay. so she is talking about communication between the jurors. there is two jurors who say that -- who told harpootlian and griffin they knocked on every jurors' doors two of them indicated that she indicated to them don't be fooled by alec murdaugh, she also indicated to them according to their sworn testimony, look, this isn't going to take long. and then they also say that she wouldn't allow them to take smoke breaks during deliberations that they couldn't smoke until they were done. now, this is their side of the

story. we'll see what about when we hear the other side of the story. it could be very, very different. this is what we got today from the defense attorneys, laura. >> laura: isn't there is a claim, also, that a juror was dismissed for of incorrect grounds? that's another claim that they are making? >> martha: yeah. this is a wild story. this juror, the story is from the defense that becky hill moved to have a juror removed because she saw something on facebook that said that the juror's ex-husband was indicating how this juror felt about the case. she went to judge newman, they hard it out. they ended up removing this person from the case but griffin claims that the post was not from her ex-husband at all. she hadn't communicated with him in 14 years, and that she was removed improperly from this case. but, you know, as you know better than anyone, laura, we're still going to wait to hear, and there is absolutely crickets coming from the prosecution so

far. they say we are going to wait. we are going to review all of this and see what it is. this case was a huge loss for jim harpootlian and griffin. they are very big attorneys in this part of the world. the fact that this thing turned on them in three hours after they went into deliberations. they have been scrambling to figure out a way to turn this thing around. they may have touched on something that might actually work and produce another trial. and she may have an fbi investigation into her becky hill because part of this is a federal prosecution request or investigation request, potential criminal acts of tampering with a jury. >> laura: if you want to see martha's full "the full hou "fae of murdaugh" a woman says she was stoned and hanged at the same time for her views on trans athletes and she is here next with her story

hey, i just got a text from my sister.

you remember rick, her neighbor? sure, he's the 76-year-old guy who still runs marathons, right? sadly, not anymore. wow. so sudden. um, we're not about to have the "we need life insurance" conversation again, are we? no, we're having the "we're getting coverage so we don't have to worry about it" conversation. so you're calling about the $9.95 a month plan -from colonial penn? -i am. we put it off long enough. we are getting that $9.95 plan, today. (jonathan) is it time for you to call about the $9.95 plan? i'm jonathan from colonial penn life insurance company. sometimes we just need a reminder not to take today for granted. if you're age 50 to 85, you can get guaranteed acceptance whole life insurance starting at just $9.95 a month. there are no health questions so you can't be turned down for any health reason. the $9.95 plan is colonial penn's number one most popular whole life plan. options start at just $9.95 a month.

that's less than 35 cents a day. your rate can never go up. it's locked in for life. call today for free information. and you'll also get this free beneficiary planner, so call now. (soft music) ♪ hello, colonial penn?

when we started selling my health products online our shipping process was painfully slow. then we found shipstation. now we're shipping out orders 5 times faster and we're saving a ton. go to shipstation.com /tv and get 2 months free.

>> the coach of over land college women's lacrosse team says she felt she was burned at the stake after speaking out against men who identified as trans competing on the team. kim russell says after posting on social media she was hauled in by college administrators and berated. >> you fall into a category of people that are filled with hate. >> it goes against [indistinct]. >> russell says the college demanded she apologize for her post. guess what. she said no dice. joining me now is kim russell lacrosse coach and may malman. kim, they say the college warned

you your comments were bad for your employment. what rules were you breaking? >> none. there were no rules i was breaking. i was speaking my belief my opinion and when i took that the to college with a letter from my attorney, i said, if i'm breaking university policy tell me what that policy is. please do so in writing and if you're going to fire me for breaking that policy please do it now. >> is there a community standard? my old college dartmouth has a community ambiguously worded. >> overlanded college admission values says they foster an environment that is respectful of divergent viewpoints that they want to recruitment and the

full range of views are presented on campus but they're obviously willing to run roughshod on their principal. >> over land tolls us freedom to express is a right and important to our community and the impact they could have on your ability to effectively perform the roles and responsibilities of your job. kim, have players on your team say they can't bring themselves to pass or catch or have a penalty shot because of a facebook post that you put up about this issue? not able to function. >> they still function very well. they still know how to play the game. >> were they upset you posted this and some why liberal and mad? >> yes and one player did not

come to me about the post. she went right to the athletic director and the athletic director came to me and that's how this all started. >> so one player. it's always like that the there's always one person and always someone who goes right to the top, doesn't even ask you a question. >> right. this is why it's so important to have coaches speaking out and independent women and we have heard from coaches who want to be leaders for their teams and they're scared but it is up to the adults. we can't let women, the whole obligation for women rest on college kids. there have to be coaches that step up. >> what's next here, legal action kim? are you going to file perhaps a case against the college if they don't reinstate you and apologize for what they're doing? >> everything is still on the table at the moment and i'm in the storm. we are in the middle of the storm now. >> at this point, apparently i heard she's not able to talk to

her team, her players? >> right. so over land has asked her not to attend certain events. >> unwashed. >> this would never happen to a men's coach who stood up for male players. >> all i can say is when you have two men's competing in the women's final in >> carley: president biden foreign policy is being put to the test. our enemies align against the western world, arms negotiations between north korea and russia are advancing and threat from china remains high. you are watching "fox and friends first," i'm carley shimkus. >> todd: i'm todd piro. the president heading to the g 20 summit and xi jinping says he won't go. an