night with a fox news alert retaliatory airstrikes have begun in the middle east, according to the pentagon strikes against iranian backed militias in iraq and syria striking more than 85 targets, the u.s. says it hit command and control open raigsdz and intelligence centers. this comes after three american soldiers were killed dozens more injured in a drone strike in a base in jordan this past weekend. launched by of course iranian proxies. iran is responsible pretty much for all the trouble in the region. jennifer griffin live from the pentagon. any word why the targets were not in iran considering they're the source of these proxy and terror attacks? >> well sean officials i spoke to said they were ruling out striking inside iran in this first set of strikes, and they want to message to iran they're not tryinging to to war with iran. they're hoping iran gets the

message based on these strikes against their proxies and against the irgc sites they hit tonight. the strikes lasted i'm told 30 minutes. u.s. central command submitted the targeting list to the white house. it's a campaign i'm told to maximum miegs pain for the iranian proxy forces that killed u.s. troops with a suicide drone in their barracks while they slept on sunday. secretary lloyd austin said in a response, quote. that from ojeda austin. u.s. airstrikes began at 4 p.m.

eastern at seven locations three in iraq four in syria according to senior u.s. defense officials. two b1b lancer bombers launched from the united states flew without stopping to take part in the attacks refueling in midair they can carry the air force's largest payload u.s. central command said in a statement, quote. the u.s. navy did not participate in these strikes tonight despite having a massive

presence in the red sea and the mediterranean. u.s. officials have ruled out as we mentioned striking inside iran at this time, saying they do not want a larger war. defense secretary austin was asked about what he described as a multi-tier's response that could last days. >> i don't think the adversaries have a one and done mindset. and so, they have a lot of capability. i have a lot more. and so, you know, we, as i said earlier, we are going to do what's necessary to protect our troops and our interests. >> pentagon officials also say that for now the u.s. does not plan to strike inside yemen but that could change if the houthis step up reaction. first attacks will be iran and certified yeah. >> i would go back and remind people the first attack against the houthi rebels did not symptom them but accelerated

against u.s. flag ships in the region. one of the questions i would have jennifer maybe you can answer as you talk to your pentagon sources is, there are almost 200 attacks within iraq and syria against u.s. forces. there was very little accountability from the last attack, i think we hit two empty warehouses. it's like to understand why it took that many attacks for them to respond with a lot more firepower tonight. >> well as you said this is a lot more firepower but it also has been tell grafd all week so most of those sites would have been empty, not many personnel there, certainly any of the irgc commanders and leaders would have gone back to iran or into hiding so there certainly was it seems a conscious effort not to try to kill too many people and certainly some of the leaders. we will have to see what the bomb damage assessment whether

these sites how destroyed were they what was the damage assessment but i will say sean this is not as the secretary said one and done. i would expect more of this tomorrow night more sites but the real outlier is the houthis. they have not gotten the message and if they start firing on ships that's going to open up a whole new front in this conflict. >> one key word you've been mention e they have been telegraphing it all week and i'm sure that's going questioned. great reporting throughout the day jennifer griffin thank you. now live on the ground in tel aviv mike tobin, mike the reaction there tonight. >> well one inning can i tell you sean is the iraqis are not hookup bit we have iraqi military spokesmen saying the u.s. strikes in iraq have threat end in sovereignty of that nation and threat tone quote drag the region into unforeseen consequences. this despite don kirby saying the iraqi government was indeed

warned ahead of the strikes. now 85 targets were hit at 7 locations four in syria three in iraq command and control structures according to u.s. central command, logistics support for the irgc canned subsequent proxies as well as logistics and intelligence locations. so far we have not seen any kind of violent response here in israel although a nervous high is being kept on hezbollah and on hamas even though hamas ability to fire rockets is greatly diminish and the houthis but the lutz did fire early in the day at israel or at least claimed responsibility for surface to surface missile taken out with air defense system. >> mike tobin thanks for that report, appreciate it. joining us fox news contributor retired general keith kellogg is with us and general maybe i'm just a little suspicious.

one they waited until we had nearly 200 attacks against our troops. 2 i really don't understand why they were telegraphing this this was coming and where it was coming and warnings were sent out and frankly, if you really want to send a message to iran that is responsible for all these proxy wars why go for low hanging fruit in iraq and syria? because it's safer? why not take own iran directly in this sense? i don't want war with iran. i'll be clear about that in a minute y. do we not target iranian refineries and let them know clearly that they'll be constant consequences if they attack u.s. troops nearly 200 times? >> yes, sean thanks for having me, great question and you're absolutely right. look. these were pune if i have targets. they were not targets designed to insure deterrence. here's where they should have

gone and this is just my belief and i'm not one of those who wants to starred world war iii in the% gulf but i want to establish deterrence y. did they leave the largest ex-port terminal the iranians have in the% gulf? why did they schenck the iranian spy ship that is targeting all those vehicles going into the red sea? why didn't they target all the drone factories in iran? they could have found those. they could have gone after personnel as well. they didn't do that they went after as you said the low hanging fruit. they made it easy. you've got to make it hard on the iranians. they need to know it's bee taken to a level that makes them uncomfortable. it's the same thing we did with soleimani. we knew there were consequences. we knew going that high on the escalation ladder would have them pause and rethink and

that's exactly what happened. you're not seeing that right now. i don't think these targets while they may make you feel good about all the strikes, they're not going change anything. you're going see the houthis continue to attack and see continued attacks in the middle east and the next question is now where do you go and they may end up going exactly where i said which is significant targeting within iran significant targets that moon something to the iranians boat economic military and leadership as well. >> i'll make very clear my monologue i don't want a war with iran. however if they're going to attack american troops it's got to be more than taking out two empty warehouses. that wasn't effective. the minimal strikes against the lutz we were told maybe 5 people died that the only made them more aggressive. to me if they really want to send a message to iran take out their refineries take out their money take out their ability to

foe mental terror and fight proxy wars and that would be more effective and do it with the element of surprise meaning you continue telegraph what you're about to do, which they did. >> yeah and when you talk about delays when i went back to look at all these times we hit targets in the trump administration and even before that the longest delay i saw was four days. we were heading into our sixth day on this one. this gives them time to reset rearm. sean they have those targets set well before. when you look at the commanders in centcom putting folders together they update them. you can launch those immediately. you could start in it 48 hours, not 5-6 days down the line that gives them time to react respond gear up and evacuate personnel. that's exactly what happened. i would love to see what the bda is, the bomb damage assessment but i don't think it's that significant. it's part after campaign because

we have had to repeat these targets again and again and again until we get serious and hit hard and i know it's divide and there is risks to it but actually go inside iran and go to where the problem really is and that's iran. >> lieutenant general keith kellogg as always thank you. appreciate your time. following the strikes senator lindsey graham of south carolina was critical of the administration's response telling fox, quote. by the way, i agree with senator graham here. the lapse of time, giving a heads up and a warning that this is coming, absolutely lessens the impact. let's be clear i'm not advocating a war with iran but there's got to be rules in life that evil nations need to abide

by. if you attack american troops nearly 200 times there must be and will be severe consequences without any warning. and if you really want to send a strong message to the iranian mullas you need to carry out strikes inside iran. hit them where it hurts. that would be their number one source of their economy and revenue and that would be their oil infrastructure. you know, take out their ability to make money the money used to fund terrorism and that money would send a clear message. those refineries if they were taken out guess what, the iranian mullas would be in trouble. senator tom cotton i don't like the idea of telegraphing what we are doing with low hanging fruit. i would like to see what the real aftermath is but they've

already tried two quote pointless attacks that were meaningless why would they think this is going to be any different? >> good evening, sean. those are all good questions. i think a lot of the points you make are points i hear. they don't want a war but they understand the quickest way to get aware is the weak hesitant responses we have seen from joe biden three years now. remember these attacks have accelerated since the october 7th atrocity in israel but there were almost a hundred attacks on our troops before that atrocity on october 7th and we only respond behead 4-5 times as you say hitting tim warehouses, the way to prevent a war from happening is strong confident forceful retaliation whenever enemy nations target your troops. that's what president trump did when he killed kualawelcome soleimani. that doesn't start a war that

prevents a war. >> i agree and to me, i go back to my earlier point. they tell grafd i. they gave him time to prepare. that gave the people responsible time to escape. i don't think the iranians for one second give a hoot, i'll be pleasant about it, about what happens in iraq and syria. i don't think they care at all and i don't think they care if any of their proxy fighters are killed because they're probably figuring rightly so there's going to be a million more volunteers behind them that will go out and do their bidding for them if they supply the repry to do it and that's what they've been getting away with. >> yeah, that's right, sean. iran has sometimes said it's willing to fight america and israel to the last arab they have a proxy strategy. when we hit their proxy strategy. you have to take the fight to the iranians and to telegraph

for five days what we are going to do so iran leaders can go back to syria and limit our self to the infrastructure or the command and control centers or bunkers in syria it's a tactical success but they can get new bunkers and command and controlled centers. you have to hit iran where it hurts. you shouldn't be telegraphing it 5-6 days in advance and you shouldn't be saying all week long we don't want toes climate we dhoengt iran can control these groups. all these leaks are designed to send a signal the exact opposite of what joe biden actually is sending. he wants to send a signal, oh, let's have paet, let's have quiet and all it does is embolden tone continue attacks and that will be the measure of success do attacks on american hoops is international shipping stop. >> senator cotton thanks for

being with us. president biden's appeasement has emboldened the mullas of iran. selling oil abroad they've made hundreds of billions of dollars, remember biden unfroze -- 6 billion for them ransom payment and police nor swan and after that waived sanctions and allowed a edward 10 billion payment iraq to iran for electricity allowing them to use more funds to provoke more terror and proxy wars. the white house admitted this was a possibility at the timed. >> who insist the iranian regime won't touch the $6 billion of iranian funds being unfrozen but isn't it true it freeze tehran to support terrorism and boosting its nuclear program? >> well, to the degree that they continue destableizing activities and i can't predict what they'll do going forward

here but we already have pressure in place on iran, both through sanctions and our military presence in the gulf region. we won't less tate to take additional actions as we see further destableizing activity by iran but there's a lot of checks and balances on this money. the mullas won't get their hands on its, it will go to the iranian people for food and medical supplies. the iranian people won't be punished by. this they'll be aided by this. >> join us now floor senator mike waltz and brett is with us. congressman let me started with you. this is an important point. the first policy the biden administration had was appeasement and that's where they turned a blind i'd to them selling oil and making hundreds of billions of dollars. then it was, let's bribe the mullas in iran and do a $6

billion payment for hostages allows the $10 billion from iraq to be paid, edward 10 billion. that's an awful lot of money. joe biden's policies have helped the iranian mullas get rich again. we have 200 attacks against american troops in iraq and syria they do nothing and before this attack they telegraph it's coming they go after proxies they don't go after the head of the snake and if they would have taken out their refineries which again i don't want a war with iran but i don't want american troops abroad to be attacked 200 times either and the only way to stop that is the use of fierce force of the united states, show them what we are capable of, hit them where it hurts. this to me does not hurt them. >> yes, sean i share your skepticism and senator cotton's. once it is basement clear we were once again you know that,

the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again to no effect that we are once again hitsing the proxies rathered than the irgc the iranians who are right there beside them advising training equipping leading right there beside them but we gave them plenty of time to get out of there. once we hit the proxies i fear i want this to be successful. we all do, but i fear it's not going to be and sean, i just heard tonight from soldiers who are down range right now and they're telling me this is going to' equated to nothing more than a multi-million dollar fireworks show that this is yet another check the box, and oh birx the way, journalists in the middle east the bbc and others are reporting that many of those sites are already vaxxed. everybody in the region knew this was coming. so i think we are hitting empty

sites. up the want to shut off the cash, houbs republicans pass the act that would put secondary sanctions on chinese brokers insurance companies shipping companies refineries that are pouring billions into iran through buying their oil that has been sitting at chuck schumer's cement he could take it up and send to it the president if we were serious about cutting to have cash. it's not on fueling terrorism. it's sending drones and missiles to russia that's hitting ukraine. so this is just an infuriating policy there a peasment policy on iran is being led by the same crew that led us in jcpoa back in 2015. biden blinken sullivan and crew and it's just again it's the definition of insanity, the same old thing all over again. >> it looks to me if i can bring you back in belakovich looks to

me like this was a check the box moment like this was not a serious attempt at stopping the iranians. if it was a more serious attempt at stopping the iranians they would have gone after iranian refineries and that would have sent a message and that would have done some real damage and that would have hit them where it hurts. look. we will have an assessment. one person can i tell you that was not the check the box diploma when soleimani got hit on that tarmac by donald trump he had no idea it was coming there. was no heads up there. was no warning. there was no time to escape. nothing. he died right there where he belonged and to me, that sent a message. they took out the number one terrorist that had been killing american troops in iraq and they didn't his tailtd doing it. that put them back on their illegals. that they didn't expect. why wouldn't, why would the biden administration be giving them a heads up this is coming and then target the low hanging

fruit not in iran but in iraq and syria? >> yeah exactly so let me get this straight. iran murders american soldiers so we decide to just bomb syria and iraq instead. how does that make any sense? they keep getting away thitd. they don't regret hurting americans for one second and they're going to continue to do so. how many more soldiers need to die before we do something effective to stop this before it happens again? i just hope these strikes are start of actual cohesive strategy and campaign for once to stop the terror that the is the iranian and their proxy groups but i doubt it will be more than p.r. for this administration to overstate the scope and dealing with this problem. for days they've been telegraphing our military response to the world. iranian media is claiming all the targets were evacuated lock before the strikes took place and the back channelling this administration has done directly with iran the last few days

legitimizes their long-term strategy and we even apparently informed the iraqi government before the strikes took place and who do you think iraq is going to call first before receiving that message? the highest levels of their parliament. do you know how many veterans of the iraq and afghanistan war are missing limbs or paralyzed because of iran and iranian made weapons? enough the is enough. i fear more americans are going to die because thereof administration's decision. >> brett thank you. congressman walters thank you. a lot more coming up terrorists abandon bases in iraq and syria before tonight's airstrike because biden broadcast what he was going to do. we know the answer, the question is why. we will explain straight ahead. ...might not be as easy. oh yeah, touchback! visit directv.com for up to $200 reward card.

>> leading up to today's strikes

against iran backed militants in iraq and syria joe biden and his administration as we have been telling you spent the entire week letting the world know their response was coming and on wednesday an iraqi official told cbs news some of the islamic resistance had evacuated the bases in iraq and syria so it's fair to ask did they abandon bases because of joe biden telegraphing to the world? what about the element of surprise in may be old-fashioned but works. former cia station chief dan hoffman, pentagon official eldridge colby. doesn't make sense to telegraph it or dough after targets of proxies when you know that the head of the snake is over here. i don't think iran really cares what happens inside iraq and

syria at all. i think they feel that they'll have plenty of our proxies to do their bidding for them and unless they're impacted by it, i think to them it's just another day. >> yeah. you know, i think what we saw here was the biden administration seeking just to avoid any escalation hand they put a praem yum on that as opposed to reestablishing escalation dominance deterrence over iran. the one point i would make a bit of a nuance i'm not sure it matted wheers where we launch the strikes inside our outside iran, remember the trump administration killed welcome soleimani and another target at the dagnabbit international airport. >> there was one big difference and that was the element of surprise existed. >> absolutely. i'm getting to that sean.

totally agree with you. there's no reason to telegraph what we are doing before hand. also we shouldn't be taking potential strikes off the table. we should never have said we wouldn't strike in iran. why let the iranians think we won't do that? this could be as senator cotton said a tactical success but it's not going to al material strategy about carrying on a proxy war against the united states. >> we have nearly 200 attacks against u.s. soldiers in iraq and syria. that's a lot of attacks. they had one response. they made a big deal about it. turned out they had hit two empty warehouses. we had heard great britain and the u.s. teamed up together and went after the houthi rebels. there was hope that maybe this was going to be impact gul. turns out the houthis were emboldened bid that attack because it didn't have any impact and they got even more

aggressive to u.s. flag slips in the region so it seems to me the strategy starting with appeasement bribing the mullas in iran and now being nice saying we are going to hit your proxies we don't want to hit you and be in conflict with you, that policy seems to have had failed dramatically and i don't think this is going to make a difference. i hope i'm wrong but i don't see it. >> you start from the bright point of view we don't want a major war in the middle east but also we've got bigger problems in china but the way you avoid a war is not by just pleading and losing the element of surprise that i'd put in the same category being calculable so the iranians would not be almost crazy not to think they can get away with more.

instead what we need is a combination of what you've been talking about and others like tom cotton and mike waltz and henry kissinger wrote about if you want something to end you need to hit hard nike like gradual escalation but at the same time it's important to step back and look at the situation and say what benefit are we as a nation and particularly other servicemembers getting for the exposure to be out there? what are they doing in iraq and syria? president trump tried to withdraw them. that makes sensor to realign and rationalize and we are not living in the world of 20 years ago, mike waltz said if we get in a campaign our stockpiles are deploitd. admiral said the chinese might

move but i think we've got to look at them together and if you look at them you say letting the iranians off the hook saying they're not responsible for the proxies but also saying leave our places all over the place and mark montgomery present tired admiral said we don't have enough air defense for the entire middle east. we do have important interests there but at the same time be firm. >> dan to me the issue is thief had almost 200 attacks against american soldiers. here's the question that should have been asked. what is the proportional response? now, i happen to be maybe a little too old-schooled and trained in mixed martial arts. i'm just a believer of somebody hits you, you hit them back ten times harder. can we say this is proportional to the killing of u.s. troops? because i don't really see this impacting the iranians at all,

actually. >> well, it was after one u.s. contractor killed in dagnabbit the trump administration decided to target the head of the irgc, soleimani. we reestablished escalation dominance by striking them hard, and we didn't have to target a number of sites. we just took out the leadser of the irgc and remember going back to the beirut embassy bombing and the marine barracks bombings 40 years ago that's the irgc. they've been doing it 40 years and we never held iran accountable, only rarely and whether we don't, this is the result. >> well said. all right. thank you both. appreciate your time tonight. when we come back, big news out of georgia fani willis admitting

she had a personal relationship with that highly overpaid prosecutor nathan wade but denies a conflicts of interest. she paid him a ford tune. he didn't have experience and they took vacations with the money she paid. we will check in with greg jarrett and dershowitz next.

>> all right, shocking developments in trump's jada case tonight, the special prosecutor hired by the d.a. in fulton county fani willis admits in a court filing that he and ms. willis developed a quote personal relationship and they've even paid for each other's' travel with quote personal funds but willis says it's not a conflict of interest

but claims it has not prejudged trump's case. she also reportedly is refusing to rekuls herself and today was hit with a subpoena from the house judiciary committee chair jim jordan and they have launched an investigation into her potential misuse of federal funds. here with reaction fox news legal analyst greg jarrett and harvard law professor alan dershowitz. greg start with you my understanding now they've confirmed this relationship not the biggest surprise in the world she paid a guy that according to everything i've read is not particularly experienceed in criminal law like this a guy that was paid more than people that had more experience, a whopping $654,000 and she befd because she got to take valve gantd vacations and trips to the white house to do god knows what on biden's team so i don't know, was in case

falling apart? >> well, it is falling apart and willis finally after four weeks today fess up and tell the truth. she couldn't keep blaming it on racism because the evidence of her unth cal behavior was documented. she could be disqualified from this case and she had the appearance and real impropriety. in the prosecution is so tainted that the judge should remove it entirely from the d.a.'s office f. that happens, i suspect fresh eyes would see this for what it is a legally unsound indictment that perverts the racketeering laws and the fact the boyfriend travels to washington for two eight hour meetings at the white house slows these charges against trump were politically driven. so now there is a federal

investigation for misusing public funds, fire of a whistleblower, and two georgia investigations examining how she and wade personally profited how they used covid money to bring the case. they failed to obtain permission from the county for the cash she what doling out to her lover and wade took actions apparently including indictments before he was sworn in so this scheme of theirs smacks of mispropose operation of public funds and willis could be removed from offices. she had could face criminal charges. >> professor, let's get your take on. when the plea deals leading up to this case nobody was pleading guilty to racketeering or rico charge which makes one wonder why that statute was pursued in the first places, not usually used in a case like this. let's get your take what impact will this have on this

particular case these indictments and what about the plea agreements. >> well, you know, i taught legal ethics for 30 years and this is a classic case of conflict of interest by her own standard. she said when she was running for office you should not have a personal relationship with your subordinates. she shooed supervisor her subordinate s. she in position to supervise hills when they're lovers? why should we believe the affidavit and the statement saigtd their relationship started only after he was lyrid? relationships don't operate that way. this is not a some enchanted evening moment. this is a developing relationship over time. started as friends. that happened before he was hired. then it developed into a relationship. we gleed a timeline. these affadavits cry out for cross-examination. i would love to cross examine both of the people and find out exactly what happened. when did the payments start? i would liked to see all the

bills, finds out everything but the most important thing is that a defendant entitled to a conflict-free prosecution in which the chief prosecutor has supervisory power over subordinates which is supposed to exercised a neutral way. the appearance of justice played right into the hands of those who believe that this is another get trump moment, another attack to try to just prevent president trump, former president trump from becoming future president trump. there is political and she made a dreadful mistake by allowing the appearance of injustice to have such an impact on so many americans who have no paith in the outcome in this case as long arizona she and he continue to be involved. >> wednesday said, professor and greg jarrett thank you. i think this case is in deep trouble. we'll see how it unfolds.

when we come back a shocking exclusive report sarah cartered about the illegal immigrant crisis. please stay with us. so this might be a good time to mention that aspen dental can create natural looking dentures in no time. just for you! and that comes with $0 down plus 0% interest if paid in full in 18 months. helping mothers of grooms look their best. it's one more way aspen dental is in your corner. somebody would ask her something... ...and she would just walk right past them. she didn't know they were talking to her. i just could not hear. i was hesitant to get the hearing aids because of my short hair. but nobody even sees them. our nearly invisible hearing aids are just one reason... ...we've been the brand leader for over 75 years. when i finally could hear for the first time, i could hear everything. enjoy sweet offers during our limited time...

...love your hearing event. call 1-800-miracle now.

hi, i'm ben and i've lost 60 pounds on golo. (guitar music) with other programs i've tried in the past they were unsustainable, just too restrictive. with golo i can enjoy my food and the fear and guilt of eating is gone.

>> all right, the illegal immigrant crisis in new york continues to spiral out of control. we learned the city of new york signed a new deal costing $137 million more to house liam immigrants in hotels in the city and that's not all. according to the "new york post," the city also launched a $53 million program to give illegal immigrants prepaid credit cards. don't think other vets have ever gotten treatment like and we learned illegals crossing received over a billion dollar

in money cards according to the washington examiner. in massachussetts a community center closed to the public to shelter illegal i am grant's. sarah carter went to roxbury to speak with the community. >> what happens to the community when the recreational complex gets taken away? >> the bottom line our experience right now young man interviewing now he has two children lives in the neighborhood so he's talking about now when he does the work they have to do it outside because they're using this complex so he's a prime example of what you're talking about right now. >> how bad is that for the community when the children have no place to go? >> it's horrendous and we have been struggling with finding space and facilities and to have one more space taken is a huge challenge. >> is it frustrating knowing their opening a shelter for

migrants you can't use even though you're homeless? >> yes. >> how's that make you feel? >> well, sad because why can i not be in it too? if anybody can be in there if they're homeless why just a migrant? how about out of state or out of country? >> is it surprising to you? >> it's surprisings they're skonling to roxbury because we don't have stuff for news is here with reaction fox news contributors tommy bruce and joe conha. you can be a group of immigrants in the done threw illegal beat the hell how the of cops get out of jail in seconds, no bail laws, go to california, and if you stay in new york you stay in a hotel with a prepaid credit card courtesy of federal and new york taxpayers. 000.

you can't make that up. >> yeah. look. that's joe biden's america. this is the democrats' america. they have complete control over the state of new york and over new york city and this is what they do. they can't blame it on fights over policy. there are no fights. this is what they created. it is a result of policy. by the way, one out of every 83 new yorkers american citizens are homeless in this city and it is now projected forward the illegal alien migrants community that new york city will be paying about $10 billion through the summer of 2025 to take care of them. so, these are choices that are made. we are being told that american citizens come last, that you don't matter that, the women and children living on the streets of new york who are american citizens are secondary if they even enter into the equation. they're certainly not getting

money cards. i mean, this is a cover-up of huge proportion sean by handing out money hiding them in hotels, no-bid dynamics feeding them three squares a day they think they're going to keep it quiet and then you get the attack on the new york police department. my questioned and all our questions have to be who were these young men and i would argue that in fact, this is a creation of the attitude of what they walk into in this country, contempt, disregard for human life, entitle menltd realizeing that nothing will happen to them. where did they learn or believe that they could attack the police and nothing would happen? so these are creations of policy and now as they escape to the southern part, it's calexico i think the reports are where these subs are going to pop over the border and come back in six

weeks with new names. >> when you get out on no charges and go to california you get to flip the bird or a double bird at photographers on the way out of jail free. you know. how do people live in a place like that? it's total anarchy. >> it's anarchy sean and this is one of the biggest if not the biggest story of the year of this election cnn -- season you look at the cnn home page, there isn't one on the illegal immigrant crisis gulfing cities in states like arizona and texas. there is one story on cnn and for those at home make sure there's no food in your mom, why whale poo has massive value so they have room for that. this is what the mission looks like. it's on the home page of t ball

of alejandro mayorkas. do you think the united states wants to be a country of immigrants? if you're looking for honest coverage of the biggest coverage in the story you'll see the dallas cowboys playing in february before that happens. >> you can't make it up the inmates are running for the asylum. are you ready? in 277 days. more hannity next.

why are force factor vitamins so popular at walmart? force factor uses the highest quality ingredients to deliver powerful, healthy results from delicious and convenient supplements. that's why friends and family recommend force factor. rush to walmart and unleash your potential with force factor.

unfortunat evening. please say your dvr so you never, ever, ever, ever miss an episode of hannity. . as always, thank you for being with us. thank you for making this show possible. in the meantime, let not your heart be troubled by gregi. gutfeld standing by to put a smile on your face. have a great weekend. welcome to this special