tv Life Liberty Levin FOX News September 7, 2024 10:00pm-11:00pm PDT
10:00 pm
possible. i said come home, bring your laundry home, we want to see you so just because i would like to have her around, i'm not worried about her when she's off on her own but if you run into my daughter, i want you to know i have a specific set of skills. [laughter] >> feeding of guys -- >> if you went back to griff jenkins in high school, i was all for homework but that will do it for us. we got to leave it there. we'll be back here tomorrow 7:00 weekend show". life, liberty and levin starts in a moment and we will continue with the latest on the breaking news. ♪
10:02 pm
you have had experience with the kamala harris as a d.a. attorney general senator and so forth. tell the american people a littlittlebit about your story. to draw the attention of kamala harris. >> first filed a lawsuit against the church for being molested as a child. and the priest who had molested me was a priest from san francisco. i went to to san francisco with other victims before kamala harris was d.a. we talked to the district attorney and terrence had accumulated files, lots of files on sex and bewkes who he had subpoenaed and gathered through investigations. he was going after them full
10:03 pm
force. kamala harris beat him in early 2004 as the new district attorney. so the files were in her care then. so, we immediately started contacting her, asking her if she released the names in those files or release the complaints in the files because there were a number of people who had filed a suit against the predators. we wanted them held accountable. she ignored us. we started protesting at her office. and she kept ignoring us. the press started contacting her saying are you going to release these files? what are you doing about the predators et cetera and she ignored them. this went on for a long time. my suit went to court jury trial. the priest who had molested me was in san francisco working as a pastor at a church in school
10:04 pm
with access to children. so i wrote her again and say i'm actively suing this man for child molestation he is with kids now and so are a number of other clergy and teachers who have molested kids but you need to do something about this. she kept ignoring it. so they kept the priest in ministry. and a number of us would protest at her office and in san francisco we passed out flyers virtually begging her to do something. she kept ignoring us. the press contacted her and said why aren't you releasing these files and these names? her answer was she was protecting the victims. well, i am one of those victims. she was out protecting the victims because the victim's names are redacted from the files and the claims. the only names that appear are those that are the predators. she was shielding them in our
10:05 pm
eyes we could not understand why, for one thing she was not prosecuting them. she was not investigating them. she was not really sink their rr names and cap shielding them. anwe could not understand that. mark: the d.a. she beat was not shielding anybody from what i am understanding. he was collecting evidence, he was obsolete doing that for the purpose of taking action but you are able to communicate with him i assume your lawyers were able to communicate with them so she defeats him and it completely changes the operation of the d.a. these pedophiles and these predators, correct? >> correct. and i met and went in his office but he showed me boxes and boxes of files he said look at all the files i have on these predators. he said i'm going after them with full force wandered miles an hour and i'm going to get these guys and hold them
10:06 pm
accountable. and then it went from that, to her taking the new position and then nothing happened at all. despite constant asking her to do anything at all. she did nothing. mark: kamala harris said her speech on thursday night she said the pivotal moment for her deciding whether to become a prosecutor involved her best friend who she said was abused by her stepfather. now, if that was a pivotal moment that her best friend was abused by her stepfather why wouldn't she then had to have empathy for you who was abused by a priest and others who were abused kept clawing at her door begging for help? >> you know, right now there's more than 500 lawsuits against the diocese of san francisco as i speak to you from victims who
10:07 pm
have been sexually abused. they are saying that there are a number of priests who were active during her tenure and are going after them now civilly. we have collected a list of 500 clergy and teachers that were in that diocese that in those names sheet had access to files and files, boxes and boxes of files with a lot of those names in there. what happened was sheet did not prosecute one of them. not even a one out of 500. not only that she did not investigate any of them. you could say the statute of limitations ran on a lot of these guys and you cannot prosecute them. a lot of them weren't serial offenders and repeat offenders at their names and files of
10:08 pm
these guys doing things to kids it did not end there with the first claim. a lot of them repeated it so why didn't she investigate them thereafter? she could've said there's names he or she could have done it again she could have aided people in current lawsuits because there may have been a precedent before i were these gs molested kids there and the names and files she had it. we want her to release the files to help the current people hurt record for prosecuting these 500 guys that we haven't list for san francisco predators at her record for prosecuting them is zero. her record for investigating them is zero and her record for helping people in the current lawsuits against these predators is zero. mark: what is a motivating her some powerful forces? what is the deal? >> at the time during her tenure
10:09 pm
at the bishop was lovato that he was the most powerful bishop that were predators had been sued or claims had been paid all ready been there were more coming. i think, i cannot prove it but there's something going on she did not want to release the files. she said she would be protecting the victims and i am one of them of a san francisco priest. she was not protecting we wanted the names of the predators out there. i don't know what she was shielding them as much as she was up at. >> to her question about this during the camp pain she's been using the fact she was this fantastic prosecutor. she went after pedophiles and defended children. you said wait a minute, no she didn't look at our cases here. jonah questioned about this and in the minute we have left what you want to say to her?
10:10 pm
>> why didn't you prosecute? we have a list of over 500 predators in california was she was attorney general we have a list of over 1100 predators while she was attorney general she did not prosecute any of them either i would like to ask her why didn't you prosecute one of the 1100 and why did you ignore me and the other victims claiming these were in ministry with kids right under your nose in the city. you claim to have a black belt in prosecuting child molesters. give a black belt in precedent child molesters why didn't you prosecute one out of 1100 of them? i would love to ask for that question to her face. mark: we will be right back.
10:14 pm
10:15 pm
propaganda, with push polls and all the rest of it. we the people have a responsibility like early on in our republic to speak to each other, to text each other, to e-mail each other, to share links, share information, and other words as a bite a abide at so and articulately bought it in medium output not top-down democrat oligarchs but not top down democrat party campaign. we need to resist this manipulation. resist this propaganda resist this dictators election and have a ground assault is that make sense to you? >> yes nothing is going to force these people to wage a normal campaign a legitimate campaign and be transparent as if they fall behind in the pool then they will come out. she will not want to speak to that media or have a press conference or jute debates she will she is behind. the only way to do that is all of us according to our station
10:16 pm
podcasting frequent meetings, town halls, getting out the vote, donating, we can force the momentum and the trump campaign has a brilliant chance because the republicans did this and 88 with the carcass. they did it in 88 with jimmy carter. they tried to do the same thing run out the clock and reinvent these radicals as moderates. the republicans ran a brilliant campaign for they talked about issues they said this is who she is this is what she has done here are the issues. this is what she will do parade thperthis is 85 -- 90 day type campaign do not fall for it. and there you go again. that type of stuff that was a tough campaign. lee atwater in 88 were brilliant. they turn to ha turned to michas and a jimmy carter into the people that they really were for their hard leftists but running as centers and moderates and uniter's. if trump can do his apart and stick to the issues they've got pretty good people around them
10:17 pm
and show these ads in get out there and do more press conferences and just talk about who she is. she's a neo- socialist is a force multiplier of the biden disaster and trent should have gone far left in the mcgovern's of 72 are the dea do caucuses oe carter's. all of us have to work in unison to tell people that. there is no chance, no opportunity for factionalism but he got to unite say this election is not just about us or trumpets about the future of the republic. they have ideas in store for us that we have never seen before. mark: this is an election truly about liberty in that tyranny is in it? >> it is absolutely. we have seen it the way they run the campaign that we they have suppressed innat any transparen. they suppress the voters at will and the primary they anoint people they have a back room deals as a 19th century old boy big city boss type it's a
10:18 pm
very, very hard left they know it's against human nature people do not want that agenda and yet they feel they have the institutional power in the money to put it down our throats. let's hope we can stop them. mark: just as the last, they keep saying she's running a joys campaign. you walk around, i go to diners i go to home depot. i go all over the place the grocery stores to the people seemed joyous to you? they seem joyous in washington the democrat party in the media. but to me people seem stressed. they seem upset. they seem pretty disgusted with what is going on. how to there's a huge opportunity a huge gap between the washington ruling class and delete the new york ruling class and elit delete that's that med, the politicians and the rest of the country a tremendous opportunity. it's a great book it's updated encourage you to get the case for trump updated for this year
10:19 pm
10:24 pm
latest as we learn it. i am bryan llenas and now back to "life, liberty & levin." ♪ we would' would my great heroe great thomas, most of you know who he is. he wrote columns for decades. he has written fantastic books. he is been a leader in the liberty movement for at least half a century as far as i am concerned. he has been a warning the warnin people of tyranny. what tyranny it looks like aggressive tyranny and from my perspective we are sitting dab in the middle of it. it's got this fantastic new book out social justice fallacies by thomas so he can get amazon.com or any major bookstore it is a
10:25 pm
fantastic book. i want to welcome you. and lelet me say this to you, ie been following you since i was a little kid. not to date both of us you had an enormous impact on my life. in fact you've had an enormous impact on the way i do this program but i remember you on the bill buckley on firing line and you were a killer debater absolutely unbelievable. all of that said let me start this way social justice fallacies. you started out as a marxist as many young people do in colleges and universities it did not take long for you to realize wait a minute this is not all that it is cooked up to be. was the social justice stuff in this inequality stuff these terms, these ambiguities did that have an impact on you first being a marxist and then realizing this is all bs? >> yes it did. there's a very simple
10:26 pm
explanation i became eight marxist i did not know as much as i knew after several years of study and observing things going on. as a fax carried a lot of weight with me. when the facts kept going the wrong way i realized this was not going to do what it claimed it was going to do. one of the big problems about the social justice field is what they say sounds so good. it's only after you study history that you find out just how bad how horribly it actually turned out. mark: sees that prices are very nebulous, social justice, what does that mean? basically if you agree with the marxist and the leftists you support social justice but on the other hand if you support individuality and private property rights obviously or antisocial justice? what is all this mean? >> that is have a look at it.
10:27 pm
they seem to assume a world that if things do not turn out the same for everybody that means somebody has done somebody wrong. that is an incredible assumption that human beings have such enormous control over their own fate individually or collectively. i think back over my life and i'm sure other people can do the same in their lives. there are times that a particular person appeared on a scene and change the whole trajectory of my life. it is happened more than what i'm sure a tappet and lives of many other people. there is nobody out there who has all the incredible amount of knowledge required to take over making other people's decisions for them. mark: do you find these radicals, these autocrats are basically the term social justice, do they really mean centralized government? redistribution of wealth? a permanent government that
10:28 pm
undermines a representative government. isn't this the nomenclature for that? >> it is. if you realize what an enormously high opinions many of the intellectually elites have of themselves, you can see what it boils down to is very intellectual people like themselves just simply preempting the decisions of other people at every aspect of their lives. one of the things that is astonishing to me now is that we are having this big debate about sex education in the schools. unto me, the question is what qualifies the people who are pushing this stuff to take over the roles of parents? what's also very troubling is that this all came out during the covid pandemic when students were studying at home and the
10:29 pm
parents got to see what was being taught in the schools. now it so happens that 30 years ago i wrote a book called insight american education in which all of this was laid out just exactly as it is happening now. the fraudulence with the appearanappearances is respondio what the students want, i cannot imagine how many young people in the elementary schools especially, are saying they are a boy but want to be a girl or they are a girl and want to be a boy. i cannot think of anybody in my whole lifetime was saying things like that. and if you follow the institutional way these things are done, there are groups outside the school system and inside the school system who want to do this. and who know the parents do not want them to do it. they do it anyway and they pretend they are responding to
10:30 pm
the students want. they are not. once i was at it meeti at a meef educators and while i was there there was a man going around the country selling a particular brainwashing program. and he showed me his schedule. he was scheduled my gosh, every two or three days for months to be pushing the stuff in all of the schools. he mistook me as if he thought i was a school official and was regaling me with all of this. it's clear this is not a spontaneous thing it is organized and the tactics used are the tactics developer brainwashing in communist countries. mark: the book is a "social justice fallacies" by doctor thomas sowell. and in fact, critical race theory, the 1619 project, these are really aunt tight knowledge aren't they?
10:31 pm
they are really propaganda devices for the hard left that are being pushed in our classrooms. push in our society and so forth. these attacks on the american system, did they promote equality? did they promote unity? did they promote a melting pot society? are they intended to destroy the culture? >> clearly it's the latter but it's not just propaganda. it is propaganda that overtly prevents other views from being heard. if they would propagandize with the students were allowed to learn in different ways of looking at life that is one thing. for example there are people who have taught academic courses on racial technic issues at harvard and other places is simply stop teaching the courses.
10:32 pm
if they were saying anything that was different from what the propagandists were saying you have violence on campus and so on. and the university administrators would not protect their classes. so they just stopped doing it. one of the great was the late steven simply stop teaching his course because you had ignorance of silencing knowledge. mark: ignorance silencing knowledge. and you can write an entire section on knowledge. you break it down into separate subsections. let me ask you this, i do not know if you're watching news these days. chocolate what goes on in the classroom. are we really a nation that's about knowledge now? are we a nation that is about substituting the language of the hard left are real words? substituting the thought process of people who really seek to find the quote unquote truth
10:33 pm
with ideology? what have we become on the who whole? when i listen to them as i hear propaganda, service level bs. >> yes, that is the norm unfortunately and academic institutions. even the most prestigious. the entire ivy league is in that same mode. it scares me because you have people come on a campus and they do so a physical risk to themselves. and again the authorities do nothing. of course i do not normally go to those things anyway. they had the police all around and they're outsi their outsidee windows and doors just to disrupt the talk that's going on
10:34 pm
inside. i can member back in 1969. this is goin been going on a log time. it is so sad it has taken us this long to become aware of it. 1969 the students at harvard went into the administration building, seized it, went into the personal records and were passing out all the personal information for the faculty and other things to tha the media ao on. the president of harvard called in the police. the harvard faculty gave a vote of no-confidence to the president. he resigned. i think after that other presidents decided the way to get along is to have preemptive surrender. and there has band that has beeo an art. mark: you have been studying our country for a very long time. in history, economics, philosophy. you have covered all horizon.
10:35 pm
forty years ago, 50 years ago today was the country in a better position today than it was half a century ago? or is it in a worse position? >> much worse. the silencing of the other side has now become much more prominent. the real danger is not in the silly idea that's being promoted it's in the fact that nobody else is allowed to reply to them. without some danger to themselves. mark: do you see in this country a growing police state? i don't necessary mean a police state like he was in the aggressive fascist or marxist regime. but slowly but surely it your time not controlling the language which controls thought and activity. this massive censorship the judges have now ruled on, this administration. you can see the department of
10:36 pm
justice and so forth. let me put it to you this way to a more fine point. are we a free country today? i remember once saying the americans talk like marxist. are we a free country today or are we a country on the precipice of losing our freedom? >> i think the latter. it's hard for me to see how we are going to come out of this. especially when people are so willing to increase the powers of government do not seem to understand that it does not matter for what purpose you gave them that power. this may have been good purposes. once they have that power they can use it for what ever they want. the federal reserve system was set up for example to prevent runaway inflation or runway deflation or bank failures.
10:37 pm
they were one 100% behind that. the cold fact is there's more deflation as in during the great depression and more inflation for decades on end. more bank failures in ever occurred prior to this heading up of the federal reserve system. but, the federal reserve system for example can force people to do things they don't want to do. just because the have the power to hold up with their decisions are. and so the power for one purpose is then used with a different purpose. when fdr took the united states up the gold standard he used a law passed during the french world war to prevent trading with enemy nations. but once the power was there you can use it for anything you wanted too. mark: we will be right back. rsv can severely affect the lungs and lower airways.
10:38 pm
but i'm protected with arexvy. arexvy is a vaccine used to prevent lower respiratory disease from rsv in people 60 years and older. rsv can be serious for those over 60, including those with asthma, diabetes, copd and certain other conditions. but i'm protected. arexvy is proven to be over 82% effective in preventing lower respiratory disease from rsv and over 94% effective in those with these health conditions. (♪) arexvy does not protect everyone and is not for those with severe allergic reactions to its ingredients. those with weakened immune systems may have a lower response to the vaccine. the most common side effects are injection site pain, fatigue, muscle pain, headache, and joint pain. arexvy is number one in rsv vaccine shots. rsv? make it arexvy. [dog bark] ♪
10:39 pm
[dog whining] is your dog telling you they may have allergic itch? apoquel is the #1 treatment for allergic itch... that veterinarians have trusted for over 15 million dogs... and it starts working in just 4 hours! do not use in dogs with serious infections... may cause worsening of existing parasitic skin infestations... or preexisting cancers... and serious infections. new neoplasias have been observed. do not use in dogs less than 12 months old. ask your vet for apoquel. now available in a tasty chewable.
10:41 pm
what'd he say? if you bet on a player to score the first touchdown and instead he scores the second? boom! you get your money back - in cash. straight cash? second chance, you heard? what if my guy fumbles, and some other guy scores first? second chance. what if you need a second chance to land on the field? this offer only applies to touchdowns. you alright? i hurt my spleen! get the second chance offer from betmgm. the sportsbook born in vegas.
10:42 pm
mark: welcome back america. we're here is our friend newt gingrich. kamala harris was nominated before the convention. she usurped to the primary process as of the democrat operatives. now she seeks to circumvent the general election by making herself largely unavailable to serious question of us. you know, they get to vote in dictatorships. they vote in russia heard they vote in north korea for the vote in iran. they wrote in venezuela and so forth. voting is one thing. that's very important. but in america would like to both information and knowledge. she is making a mockery of this democratic system, isn't she? >> the whole democratic party is in a very difficult paradox. they were not talk about protecting democracy. when they shove out of office a
10:43 pm
president who had one every single delegate or 92 or 94% of the delegates. they pave it and they can pick the obama's, the pelosi's, they handpick kamala harris. note primaries, no votes. they basically say to all the delegates, this is your new leader. and then the elite media promptly builds her up. she gets the cover of "time" magazine looking like she is a model or a movie star. and we are supposed to not forget everything we know it. then they run a convention, which assumes the american people are so stupid they cannot figure out what our facts and what our fantasies. and they would like us to believe that she was never in the biden administration. that she is brand-new. that she is the candidate of change. you go down the list it is an absurdity. >> it is an absurdity that media
10:44 pm
is an absurdity there like al jazeera. but they do not care where they drag joe biden across the finish line and they pretend they did it with a broom came out. now they've got her nominated, pull her off the shelf and pull her cross the finish line. you think it's going to work? >> probably not. first of all i think it is very hard at a free society to sustain a lie. people talk to each other. i tell people all along i never worried for example about the biden/trump debate because two days after the debate people go to the grocery store. next week people are going to go to the grocery store. they will realize that much of what kamala harris said is alive. she has a handful of policy ideas out there. almost all of them bad. almost all involve higher taxes. destroying the economy. and of course reality keeps creeping in. they lost a million jobs this week because they found the
10:45 pm
government agencies had over counted it. 1 million jobs disappeared this week and what they were claiming. i think you're going to find again and again particularly between walz the most radical nominee for a party in a major ticket history and kamala this is a ticket so part to the left. so pro- big government i just do not see how they survive. mark: they are deafly trying to conceal who she is and who they are. but they have in store, god forbid if she wins, is truly the radical change of america. our economic system, our border system, our defense system and our allies will go down with us, won't they? >> sure. the fact is and we have a project called america's new majority project. we do tons and tons of polling. by 59 -- 16 the american people
10:46 pm
prefer free market capitalism to big government socialism. if you look at her speech last friday in north carolina she is clearly big government socialism. she was the government to run everything. the fact is the average american by about four -- one margin believes that doesn't work. it's not about ideology i it's about practical everyday reality. they have ideas about forcing us all into electric cars. which clearly is not working. people will not go out and voluntarily by pretty about 10% of the market once you buy a car i am all for those who want an electric car. but 90% of the country doesn't. in a free society you cannot have policies that are imposed upon the american people or they will rebel. we will be right back.
10:49 pm
10:51 pm
♪ ♪. mark: welcome back america. the non- border is our vice president of the united states was in charge of the border. we have more in slavery going on in this country as a result of this open border that we've had since the end of the civil war 300 30,000 unaccompanied children where they do not know where they are. she claims to care about children. how do you get a promotion when you have this kind of a record? a disastrous record and neither say hey i'm qualified to be president of the united states. i have a question, i'm not answering questions. what is this? >> you know governments full of people who fail up and kamala
10:52 pm
harris is the very latest of that. she again to the political appropriation line she stood in front of that convention and said i am the ones who want secure board of these are not the droids you're looking for brigh.i want to border security. she knows full well what unfolded on her administration's watch. she was supposed to be in charge of the border. she wanted it wide open as with the left wanted to do. she did not care one bit about average americans who are affected now by this crime. it was smart to go to the border, pull in those who've been killed by illegals humanize this issue americans care about the safety and security of their kids. kamala harris betrayed that. she can give one his speech was she going to do in donald trump questions are on that what she going to do she can't. the cover for her as long as she can. it was at her job she failed it. national it's a big job shall do more of this and she gets it.
10:53 pm
>> she keeps talking to this bipartisan legislation that was negotiated in secret. i think a republican house supported it. three republicans supported it. it would have been shrine for all time biden's executive orders that would ha it would ht impossible for donald trump god willing to become to secure the border would ha would've enshrit millions of illegal aliens every year coming into this country. they say i will sign that. here's my question. where are the 300 30,000 unaccompanied minors? forget about legislation for it forget about signing. what about the slavery that has occurred? why don't you go down there? why don't you speak out? why don't you do something about it madame vice president? we are supposed to give you a promotion when you screwed up as vice president of the united states. what is this bipartisan legislation nonsense? shame on the three republicans are foolish enough to sign on to even call i bipartisan when it's not bipartisan at all. you are right it is sex
10:54 pm
trafficking its sentinel comments that americans. why people can't see this it drives me nuts. they choose to ignore it. you know the reason why? no other networks cover this. you cover this, bill melugin covers that we cover it. what is mac a crime and see a little bit of that the but they will believe her lies when she says we want to control the border but no they don't they want it wide open. if they could have date would have and they didn't. trump's got to keep it tied her to the last three and half years because she is going to say it forward, how do you look forward when you are the last three years? you cannot letter it away with that. mark: i will tell you how, you are on to something. karl marx's forget about history forget about the past. it's all corrupt, feudalism, capitalism, mercantilism. get rid of it. the world begins today it is a clean slate. you call her a marxist. president trump calls her a
10:55 pm
marxist. i am glad. enough of the progressive nonsense of enough of the socialist nonsense these are american marxists. they sound like marxists they promote it, they attacked the family, they attacked sovereignty like marks. they attacked capitalism. they attacked the constitution like marks. if it walks like it and it quacks like it, that is. pete hegseth i want to thank you my brother. god bless you for all you do. >> thank you mark. mark: we will be right back.
10:56 pm
happy memories just come easier on the water. our founder, johnny morris and his dad knew this first hand, they created a boat that was more affordable... tracker, the world's #1 one best selling fishing and pontoon boats powered by mercury. proudly built in missouri and sold factory direct at bass pro shops and select dealers. for as little as 5 dollars a day... you can own a brand new tracker and make lifelong memories of your own. bass pro shops. voted america's best outdoor retailer. save even more and support conservation when you join the club.
10:59 pm
11:00 pm
economic and political interventions. always in the name of the people. some virtuous and worthy because it lead to the steady decline of liberty. the steady rise of totalitarianism. the exploitation of the people. fewer and fewer masterminds with an ever increasing army of bureaucrats and enforcers. reign over the citizenry and decide what is and is not good for them. the abuse of power are leapt let limitless as are the justifications slowly but surely the people get used to it until one day the grip is too tight? then it is too late. then it is too late. i will see you tomorrow night, sunday on "life, liberty & levin." ♪
31 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on