the run-through for the inaugural parade that is just eight days away. these are live rehearsals. next week, fox news sunday we will preview this all. a birds eye view so you can see where all of the action will happen. living the brain drops today. my conversation with doctor bobby duke of the museum of the bible. we talked about some stunning new archaeological discoveries in the surprising things they reveal about the early church in many different religions and their origins. that is it for today. thank you for joining us. have a warm safe week. fox news sunday. "life, liberty & levin" is up next. ♪ ♪ ♪.

mark: hello america i am mark levin and this is "life, liberty & levin" send eight to sunday ts rest professor jon r friend ben shapiro as well i'm not a very happy camper not in the least as a result of and actions taken by the united state supreme court in a five -- four order the other day that you are generally familiar with. this is an order that basically told the trump lawyers in new york go ahead and proceed with your judicial abomination. and you will have no recourse. now, i want to discuss this at some length i think some of the legal analysis is fantastic but it's way off point. the issue here is not just what happened in that courtroom for what happened in that courtroom in manhattan was a disgrace of

jury instructions, prejudicial testimony phony laws, ignoring the immunity and the supreme court and so forth and so on. the fact the judge ruled he's not going to imprison the president of the united states is not a victory to me. let's start from the beginning. we have something called the supremacy clause. why do we have that question of deltoid why we have that wit articles event confederation problem was the national had no authority to state governments would thumb their nose at the national or state government were fighting with each other for the national government could not raise taxation even to have an army. even to pay its debt. and so a number of our founders got together and said we've got to change this. long story short we've got our constitution. one of the areas they debated at length, at length was whose law should control what? that was the heart, the core of the problem before.

they came up with this today, article six clause to the supremacy clause. now what does it say? this constitution the laws the united states which shall be made pursuant thereof and all treaties made or which may be made under the authority of united states shall be the supreme law of the land. the judges in every state shall be bound thereby anything in the constitutional laws of any state to tstateto the contrary notwit. wow, that is a big deal there's a lot of fighting over that there were three iterations of this language. there is fighting at the ratification conventions they said it must be done if we are going to have a republic. we are going to have a functioning country. what took place in new york was a direct attack on the supremacy clause in a functioning country in the purpose for the constitution in the first place. now, i can get into the fifth amendment that we did that last week the sixth amendment, i can get into the eighth amendment, the 14th amendment which applies the fifth amendment and

other amendments to the states. we can get into all of that. i can wring my hands about what took place in that courtroom we can go over it all over again a long list of outrageous decisions, outrageous acts phony loss on and on and on that gets us exactly nowhere. and so president trump's lawyers wisely go to the supreme court although with the 11th hour and they say look, we want a stay we want you to stay this sentencing before he puts that scarlet letter on president trump's forehead about convicted felon and so we have an opportunity to do our appellate work and the new york appellate system in addition in their brief they included several arguments that i have made here. what did the supreme court do? this is all they did it's no opinion, it is an order here is the order from the supreme court the application for stay

presented to justice sotomayor and is denied for among other reasons the following reasons first, the allegedly evidentiary violations present a lecture from state court trial can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal with the new york courts. second the verdant sentencings will impose in the present elect responsibility is a relatively insubstantial by the trial court stated intent to impose a sentence of unconditional discharge after a brief virtual hearing. four justices the originalist justice thomas, justice alito, justice gorsuch us justice cap and i would grant the application they said wait a minute we need to hear this case. five said no including two appointed by republicans one appointed by donald trump the chief justice roberts associate justice barry who was obviously flipping she is flipping more and more and more. justice roberts who ha have tald about before on radio and tv is

very much influenced by the legal media. by the "new york times" is very thin-skinned he has in many respects lost his way in my humble opinion. if we had had a chief justice william and associate justice scalia with addition to these four outstanding justices that would've been a six -- three decision they would've taken of the case they would've addressed this. why? why not just let this play out in new york? number one if i had been filing on behalf of the president, this is not an attack it's just a statement i would have filed and the headline would have been merchan the new york courts have no jurisdiction. not stay so i sewin so in bot it the new york appellate court process it would've been the marquee point probably the only point and then i would've backed it up with support. because that is the bottom line.

this judge, that prosecute the new york appellate court system has no jurisdiction. so why play in the jurisdiction when you're trying to tilt the supreme court they have no jurisdiction? that is my view. why is this important and why is that true? i read you the supremacy clause did i not? what are we talking about here? without federal campaign law, even though they played hide and seek with it was the underlying law that was used to apply the hook to everything else to bring it in. this mda this judge had no authority whatsoever under federal campaign finance law. they knew which is why they would never mention it until the very end. they knew which which is why they would not allow, they would not allow the former chairman of the fcc bradley smith, that is the judge, to testify about federal campaign law they did not want that front and center,

why? because they know what i know iy would've lost jurisdiction. jurisdiction is number one. but, i want to focus on the court and these two justices robert and barry what is the job of the supreme court? i am not talking conflict of state law what is the ultimate job of the state supreme court? to uphold the constitution of the united states. that is their job. that is the bottom line. two of the republic appointed justices decided to take a walk. i don't know if they're cowards, i don't know what their position is ultimately it's not stated in the order. for justices knew we better take this up. why? this is a judicial scandal it's an abomination. the idea that the supreme court allowed the continuation of a judicial scandal a judicial abomination to allow it to play out in new york creates a

monumentally damaging precedent but let me give an example, stick with me. let's it is an appellate court in new york that has its wits and they say wait a minute we not have jurisdiction over this. were going to reverse and throughout the case of the lower court in new york. that would be a great outcome for president trump. i am all for it. that would be great. but it would only apply to new york it does not apply to any other state. let's say we have alvin bragg in l.a. and let's say elected state judge appointed state judge in l.a. we will call him merchan they pull the same stunt they can do it they can interfere with the federal election. they can make decisions about federal campaign law. they can make all of these abuses of the federal constitution of the bill of rights because new york cannot stop them and the supreme court took a pass.

what you think about that? thousands of d.a. offices, county prosecutors, state attorneys general they look they look at this preposterous order this silly order the court did not have the guts to do with this court needed to do. with this court needed to do is put an end to this say wait a minute there is no jurisdiction we cannot have a local d.a. in the middle of a federal presidential election we cannot have a local judge in the middle of a federal presidential election to make rulings like this an in number two, 10 days before the inauguration decide is going to impose a sentence whatever the sentence is. the idea that the sentences unconditional discharge and therefore they get a pass still the court is giving to this process. to the seizing of federal jurisdiction by a local prosecutor and the state judge. this is a scandal now. that's what it is a judicial

scandal because two republican opponent justices the three radical left-wing democrat appointed justices did not vote with the four constitutional originalist to say no, no, no without a straightness out. we cannot allow this abomination, this process to continue in the new york courts we are giving it supports. this is a federal matter week the supreme court are the only court they could openly that cay straightness out. this is our duty. this is our responsibility they said no. so right now there is nothing to stop a local d.a. for manufacturing another case against another presidential candidate in the middle of an election. there is nothing to stop a state judge from doing the kinds of things that merchan did outrageous, outrageous things that he did. and, on top of that the dump document here the department of justice half a century both parties taking the position we

need to avoid all of this like the plague at the federal level. we are not going to allow the prosecution's indictment of the prosecution of a sitting president. now, the criminal justice process does not end at the trial court level there's an appellate level. with the supreme court did is it allow that to go on that is the criminal process the appellate court process while donald trump's president. they rejected the federal department of justice position. in fact, everything merchan and bragg did violates this memo the position of the department of justice for half of a century which is why there's not a single federal prosecutor who would do what's being done now which is why they had to drop their cases except the case in new york goes on. and it goes on. now this is a big deal this a

jurisdictional issue. it is a big deal because they have not resolve the issue. let me go further by these two justices who are absolute cowards in outrageous and what they did and want wh white whatd was abandon their responsibilities. bush v gore decision the court stepped in without any statutory authority. basically an emergency appeal filed just like an emergency appeal was filed by president trump's lawyer call it whatever you want it is a common law process at that point because it's not a statutory appeal or a statutorily sanctioned appeal. you call it what he said the other day you call it a kumquat, whatever you want it's an emergency appeal. this court the six republicans afforded to did not thank god they finally sent us a document they finally sent us this and now we can act and protect the federal judiciary. now we can act, pull the constitution the supremacy clause now we can act to make it

abundantly clear to every d.a. in the country every attorney general in the country every state judge in the country, this will not stand you cannot do this in a presidential election. you cannot do it to a presidential candidate but you do not get to interpret federal law once you reveal what federal law you're talking about but you do not get to usurp the authority of the federal court in this court, the supreme court that is what they should have sshould've saidwhshould havesain opportunity the president's lawyers have given us this opportunity under bush versus gore ted olson brings the case and what were the questions of the florida supreme court the supreme court of florida violet article two section one clause two of the unite unites its constitutional making new election law? that is rather than the state legislature the accounting was still going on the court was still adjudicated. the counting was still going on the supreme court said the process is the problem. we are stepping in now to stop

the process. we cannot have a state court even a state supreme court interfere with the federal presidential election and the electoral college process. by changing the accounting system after the fact it violates equal protection clause of the fifth amendment as is applied to the states they stop the process which was becoming a scandal, an abomination they did not docket. the chief justice, the associate justice did not say let the system play out. because the system the process is the damage. the process is the damage. it is the damage. now here's the other thing. depending upon what that new york appellate courts do donald trump may have to go back to the supreme court assuming the new

york appellate system is corrupt as this the new york trial level system. ithey go back to the supreme court let me suggest to you at that point may in fact it take the case. who knows anymore may in fact take in the case and vote with the other four i have six constitutionalists, not activist come constitution was taken up the case what are they going to say? what else are they going to say? that's the primary basis as other thing they can say he did not have jurisdiction. what you were doing was without authority he did not have the power to do it. the question is asked why didn't you do this in the first place? why do you put the country through this but the president of the united states he will be president at the time, through this. how are they going to justify

the fact they did not act the first time? it gets much more complicated, doesn't it? the bottom line this is not about inter- lough at torrey appeals this is not about that new york appellate system. this is not about any of that this is about a majority of the supreme court refusing to uphold the federal constitution in the face of an assault by a state. fight new york. every other blue say every other hacker prosecutor and some big city as of today have the ability to do what was done to donald trump in manhattan. because the supreme court would not fix this on behalf of the supreme court the federal judiciary the framers of the constitution and the supremacy clause what's the point of having a supremacy clause is something like this can take

place? the fact is there is no point. the department of justice rules have been trashed half a century the reason for the department of justice have been trapped. let's go back to this phrase on conditional discharge what's the problem? he did not sentence donald trump to present no ankle bracelet, none of that so why did he do that? why did merchan say the sentence basically is you are guilty. you are guilty but i'm not going to punish you. if he hadn't sentence donald trump or one of the other things i just mentioned the supreme court would have to take it up. it would interfere with the office of the president. they have to take it up he says let me put the scarlet letter on trump. not given any other penalty and

then he is stuck in new york. what about the supreme court? those justices who refuse to take the case bought into merchan ploy lee cited in the order sentence of unconditional discharge after a brief virtual hearing what's the big deal? that does not interfere with the office of the president. no it gives sanction to in the stealing of a federal case that did not even exist by a state court. that's what they did unless they eventually fix it, that is going to stand. that is the bottom line. that's was going on here. well, time will tell i

let's say you're deep in a show or a game or the game. on a train, at home, at work. okay, maybe not at work. point is at xfinity. we're constantly engineering new ways to get the entertainment you love to you faster and easier than ever. that's what i do. is that love island? touch can mean so many things. even for people with moderate-to-severe eczema. touch can make two feel like one. or simply be a helping hand. dupixent can help you stay ahead of eczema as you welcome the feeling of touch. dupixent helps block a key source of inflammation inside the body that can cause eczema to help heal your skin from within. many adults saw 90% clearer skin. some even achieved long-lasting clearer skin

and fast itch relief after the first dose. severe allergic reactions can occur. get help right away for face, mouth, tongue or throat swelling, wheezing or trouble breathing. tell your doctor of new or worsening eye problems, like eye pain, vision changes, or blurred vision, joint aches and pain, or a parasitic infection. don't change or stop asthma or other medicines without talking to your doctor. dupixent. the #1 prescribed biologic by dermatologists and allergists, helps you feel the heal. see the difference for yourself. reach out to your eczema specialist today. ♪ ♪ welcome back america. we are here with one of our favorite lawyers john yoo he's s uc barkley law professor. john yoo you work for the justice department as chief of staff of the justice department. isn't interesting to the federal justice department did not

intervene in this case in claim wait a minute, these local guys have no authority whatsoever but especially given the fact the southern district of new york took up this case and took a pass. isn't it also interesting to you that most of the arguments we are hearing have absolutely nothing to do with jurisdiction? they get caught in the weeds about internet walk at torrey appeals the new york system that's all very, very interesting. but it seems to be a straightforwme astraightforwardl supremacy clause matter here should have sufficed to print what you think? lexmark i'm sure america wishes you were back as chief of staff of the justice department. this would never have happened. a lot of the commentary about president trump's sentencing as you suggested will be about the tactics of l'affaire. unfortunately they are missing, i think the bigger constitutional picture which you laid out. this is a bigger long-term threat to our constitutional system of government that goes beyond donald trump. although he is a symbol of it. one, you have a state here

attacking someone who is the president-elect. as you said the supremacy clause is supposed to stop states from interfering with the valid operations of the federal government. it's almost as if lincoln, after he was elected trying to get to washington d.c. and maryland decided to arrest him on his way to the capitol. that of course would never be permitted. one, you've got a state trying to interfere with the federal operation of the presidency. second you've got a state trying to take over the federal government's authority to enforce election loss. as you said the southern district of new york justice department the federal election commission. they all looked at this the issue in this case and decided not to bring any prosecution. the bite in justice department should have been out there saying this is our job. this is a jump of the federal government to enforce federal law no state can then come in and say we are going to hijack federal law enforcement because we think it means something

else. the third point i think this is the most of what we talked about on your show before, think about the future. hoour future presidents, future candidates for president going to think about their job knowing there might be a merchan up there, alvin bryant out there who are going to twist to state laws to try to attack them both before they are in office and then as they have been saying openly once donald trump leaves office because bragg and merchan talk about the possibility of suspending this and posing the truck i'm sorry imposing the sentence on donald trump after he leaves the presidency. i am very disappointed as i think you are in the u.s. supreme court. they are not even standing up for themselves july 1 the issued and decision the immunity decision we talked about on the show that said that presidents should be immune from prosecution for their official acts and there are three pages of that opinion the talk directly about that merchan prosecuthe merchanprosecution at

use the evidence of what presidents do to prosecute them in state courts. merchan a blue that aside. he did it anyway and waited six months for white six months? so we could sentence donald trump there be no time for an effective appeal because he wants to make donald trump the first felon president in our history. mark: that's exactly right the idea of the supreme court is never stepped in like this before we talked briefly about bush versus gore they stepped in during an ongoing election to stop that count relative to the electoral college which resulted in bush becoming president. they did the right thing in my view but that's not the point. i think who you have on the court manischewitz sheath justice rehnquist who did not care what the press wrote you had justice scalia was all about principal. he did not care about any of the rest of it. you have four justices currently on the supreme court who are

originalist in toriginalists inf whom obviously i don't know i have not discussed it with him, agree with you and me that wait a minute, we need to take a look at this case because it affects our jurisdiction and john yoo at the supreme court is not going to step in and seize sees back e authority and the jurisdiction that was stolen from the federal government, from the federal judiciary, from them by a rogue prosecutor and a rogue judge issue an order that says look, these issues can be addressed at appeal trumps issues you have unconditional discharge so it won't really impose much time on the president. aren't they missing the entire point? >> what you have here, markham is a judge because we can see it open it is political this whole thing was political. you see it in the timing of the sentencing why he waited 11 days before the inauguration so you cannot effectively appeal. the whole point of the

prosecution by bragg up for the trial was to interfere with the federal presidential election. that's a reasonable ground for the supreme court they did not say they had jurisdiction they said they did not feel like exercising i am proud justice thomas hook clerked for is one of the leaders in saying we should hear this case they were outvoted as you said chief justice roberts and justice barrett. the and the three liberals. mark: i want to reiterate the four superstars in seven guts and say we should step up and take the

hearing on thursday. i am jon scott and now back to "life, liberty & levin." ♪. mark: welcome back america. professor joh chan for an old by of mine we have thousands of d.a. offices. we have 50s attorney general office we have thousands of state judges. as of today as a result of what the united states supreme court did, is there anything whatsoever to stop them on a federal level of course, to stop them from doing exactly what bragg and merchan have done for many future candidate? what's is what's really worrisome and disturbing what's happening now. one, you can see from judge merchan, alvin bryant and the shenanigans going on with jack smith their effort to push the report out the independent counsel report, they do not intend to give up on l'affaire for they could've seen the november election as a

referendum by the american people but this was all a mistake. donald trump actually successfully do some kind of political move i'm not sure how he pulled it off use the l'affaire attacks in to his advantage. but they are not going to give up. i agree with you, mark, what's going to stop every four years some d.a., state attorney general from launching similar investigations of all of the major republican political candidates? unfortunately because the supreme court's no is not goingo intervene. and question white prosecutors bring cases. is going to have to beat red state das and rea re read the se attorney generals who are going to have to retaliate until the democrats stop. some sort of deterrence we can return to the rule of law and the norms that we had until 2019

the opened up l'affaire to use prosecutions to interfere in presidential elections. >> and with the public to understand, even if president trump wins on the appellate level in new york that has nothing to do with the rest of the country supreme court has taken a pass. let's say the highest court in new york agrees with president trump. throws out his conviction, cleaned the slate. go back to the nine state supreme court what is left with the united state supreme court what is left is this ridiculous order. that is what is left because the court would not do with the court should have done like the did in bush versus gore. what recourse is there is a practical matter? the incoming department of justice that's an excellent question i hope incoming attorney general bonnie thanks about this. i hope president trump and his staff think about this.

you have talked about this. you talk about the daniel penney case this is the guy who was prosecuted for being a hero of the new york subway system. at the same time bragg in the near court system are getting a pass to hundreds if not thousands of cases of violent felons throughout new york city. this is an opportune time for the justice department to launch a civil rights investigation into what's going on and new york state what's going on in new york city. they can consider cutting off funds to new york city. before going to go want to leapy depriving people like president trump. like daniel penny and their constitutional rights are going to start using the power of prosecution to interfere in a federal presidential elections and they are going to start, i think they should be under federal investigation themselves. >> for those out there should be retribution this is a recrimination or retribution.

this has to be fixed. we are dealing with very evil people in the case of bragg and merchan read the case of the two justices on the supreme court we are doing with two individuals who have knocked, a not, in my d their oath to uphold the constitution. they were the line of defense the four other justices were ready to go they took a pass with this mealy mouth ridiculous order. john yoo it would to thank you my friend god

mark: welcome back america for a rehearing of our friend ben shapiro for international criminal court people hear about their eyes rolled to the back of their heads pray they don't know about it, they don't care about it but we want to care about it this is a rogue radical left marxist islamic european court that claims jurisdiction it does not have even over individuals in the united states and the president on down to let's say an army infantry soldier.

and in israel they have literally indicted the prime minister of israel issued an arrest or meaning anywhere he travels, any member state that belonged to the icc is apparently obliged to pick him up and throw him in jail. chip roy have led the battle to stop this just got a statute passed or a bill passed in the house the bipartisan support current lesson this happen it fell on chuck schumer's desk and he killed it. what do you make of chuck schumer? he claims to be an active jew, the supporter of israel he is the guy that stands in the way of this law? click chuck schumer is a joke when it comes to his suppose its status as what he called he makes a joke about his name being schumer it means in jewish he's a guardian. as such are the same person who presided over the iran nuclear deer under the obama

administration. chuck schumer is not a surprise he's doing this but that's because he's international to talk about someone who's a true globalist meeting they want global rules to apply to the united states chuck schumer come to the top of the lizards over global's institution than the international criminal court which as you mentioned claims jurisdiction over parties are not evornodding signatories to . that includes by the way notice is really nice its uncl nonsens, china, india was a wide variety of states that are not a member of the icc the icc claims jurisdiction over pretty much everything and then the idea is if you are an american soldier who will say in the war in afghanistan they decide to indict you you could be arrested if you traveled to britain you could be arrested if you travel to france all the countries that are signatories to the icc as you mention have a legal obligation under the icc to arrest you and throw you in jail on behalf of the icc which, as again you say is it internationalist organization that applies its rules on behalf of the people who really, really hate western values.

>> underscore your point the people who brought these charges against them said they were funded by the iranians. south african government which is anti-semitic. supported by the irish government which is anti- somatic and so are some of these others. with respect to i'd say women. the court went along with it. as an institution isn't this an utterly corrupt institution and isn't it important the senate and chuck schumer get this thing pass questioner. >> the fact the senate is waiting on it, is a disgrace. i do think it's going to pass in the very near future and it should but hope is a first step under the new trump administration and really taken the wind out of so many of these awful international organizations range from the icc icj to the united nations itself. all this over at leading

national institutions that claim authority they don't have in the name of morality they themselves refused to define. mark: or biden decided not to stop the icc. put out statements and so forth he could've done a lot more and he hasn't. what he did do the other week as he handed out a presidential medal of freedom the highest civilian honor there is. to george soros. or the biggest self hating jews on the face of the earth who funds a radical left-wing organizations that seek to destroy the state of israel by the left-wing organization seek to destroy the united states of america. what do you make of joe biden, his policies awarding this metal to this kind of reprobate? >> i will admit joe biden without the shackles of possible reelection in front of him, you see the real joe biden we were assured he's a kindly old gentleman turns out is just an older gentleman. he is an awful person with the fact is given a medal of freedom to people including george soros that demonstrates what he is affected by the way he decided

to commute the sentence is a 37 people on death row including child rapist and murderer's the fact he's trying to shut down oil drilling before president trump can take off is just what he is. the most obvious example because he is in fact one of the most affairs forces in the west using his funding to the wors worst cs radical anti-semitic propaganda to pro- crime absolute program prosecutors the united states. mark: and we come back with sick a quick look at israel. have very popular in israel right now given the way he has led the war and organizations and countries to great success. but now we have the judiciary in israel that's completely controlled by the left. they have at trial with these phony charges much like the jumbotron. now they're going after his wife to try and get an effort to force him into some kind of a deal. they're going to have to

the future of cool, comfortable sleep is here. introducing the new sleep number climate cool smart bed. the only smart bed in the world that actively cools and effortlessly adjusts to both of you. sleep up to 15 degrees cooler on each side. it actively cools by drawing warm air away from your body, to keep you cool and comfortable throughout the night. our smart sleepers get 28 minutes more restful sleep per night. it's our lowest price of the season on our most popular smart bed. save $1,000 plus 0% interest for 48 months. shop a sleep number store near you. touch can mean so many things. even for people with moderate-to-severe eczema. touch can make two feel like one. or simply be a helping hand. dupixent can help you stay ahead of eczema as you welcome the feeling of touch. dupixent helps block a key source of inflammation inside the body that can cause eczema to help heal your skin from within.

many adults saw 90% clearer skin. some even achieved long-lasting clearer skin and fast itch relief after the first dose. severe allergic reactions can occur. get help right away for face, mouth, tongue or throat swelling, wheezing or trouble breathing. tell your doctor of new or worsening eye problems, like eye pain, vision changes, or blurred vision, joint aches and pain, or a parasitic infection. don't change or stop asthma or other medicines without talking to your doctor. dupixent. the #1 prescribed biologic by dermatologists and allergists, helps you feel the heal. see the difference for yourself. reach out to your eczema specialist today. mark: welcome back america. we're here with our friend ben shapiro. was going on in israel right now we have the left which is enshrined in the judicial system there and with the attorney general. and now they are threatening the prime minister's wife sara

netanyahu with obstruction charges putting her under investigation that lucent that case against benjamin netanyahu seems to me they are looking for a way to try to pressure him into some kind of deal. what you make of this? >> is no question it's what's happening. the reality is netanyahu has been electorally successful in the israeli system which is a really difficult system to navigate. he spent in power are 14 and the last 15 years and assist in that has elections every six months or so apparently. they basically activated law enforcement wing to go after netanyahu personally. and then when that failed they're going after sara netanyahu this is part of a broader trend you are seeing from the left worldwide. you cannot win another election of your government to go up to the politicians you did not particularly like president trump is the best possible example of this with absurd sentence by i understand he

could call him a convicted felon. the entire attempt to activate l'affaire against popular politicians of the right not just in the nine seats in israel topping south america, parts of europe, even in parts of asia it's really a demonstration of how there are in fact deep state oppositional members of these bureaucracies in virtually every western country as left because form popular you'll start to see that rear its ugly head. >> the middle east, iran, iran has to be worried right now because of donald trump's ascendancy into the presidency. they did put a hit out on donald trump they wanted him assassinated. donald trump is a very long memory. in addition to that he has sworn they are not going to get nuclear weapons on his watch. he has insisted its surrogates, hamas release the hostages before he is sworn in. what kind of impact do you think this is going to have on iran?

what's obvious that iran is running scared. they lost her entire swath of influence raising from the territory threw iraq, through syria and into lebanon. in curbing all the way down into the hamas ruled gaza strip as well as judea, samaria with the merchan. it's been widely per successful in the take out your defenses right now iran is wildly vulnerable to some sort of strike against his nuclear facilities they have to know that which is presumably why they are attempting to speed up their nuclear development. they figure if they get to a bomb they are safe. it's like playing tag. to get to the nuclear weapon, everyone leaves him alone. think president trump those that party's national security apparatus knows that. the israeli certainly know that. it would be a great shock to me if the administration did not provide severe economic pressures wit will the threat of military force something behind that don't other than the word

don't is all of america's enemies large of joe biden said don't the answer was do whatever you please that is not the case of president trump. if he says don't there's usually a fist at the end of that don't. mark: one quick minute left to pay if we do take up their nuclear sites in the government stands we have the knowledge to build nuclear weapons. as of the knowledge you take out the nuclear sites that will hopefully lead to the elimination of that regime which the people there do not want. that is the destruction of the regime once and for all. >> the iranian regime is extremely, extremely attentive footing at this point. it would not take a massive american military presence or intervention in order for that regime to fault the united states have no interest in an intervention with iran certainly president trump this of the goodness again is a very tentative regime it's on its last legs a little bit of a push it may topple over. mark: think the people will rise up as they have many times before without the support of biden. with all the support of obama

when they needed our help the rise at this time and they would succeed. ben shapiro own to thank you for everything you do for our country and i want to thank you for your voice. god bles that is their question. and nobody knows shoppers better than shopify. the undisputed, undefeated, checkout champion of the world. businesses that want to win, win with shopify. israel needs you. we desperately need tens of thousands to respond. the war is here. the great storm from the north has come against israel. you've got the scriptures calling each one of us,

not only to pray for the peace in jerusalem, but every city throughout israel that's under siege. this massive grocery store should be crowded. people are lacking food. exactly. the international fellowship of christians and jews is preparing meals for precious elderly citizens who can't get out. so many bombs yesterday. because of the war, much of her roof is gone, the ceiling is gone. she's frightened from hezbollah. hezbollah. how does she get food? the international fellowship of christians and jews will come in. you provide groceries, vegetables, hot meals. it's you. your emergency gift will help provide food to klara and thousands like her, trying to survive in the evacuated areas of israel. your urgently needed gift of $45

will help rush the delivery of an emergency food box and nutritious meals for a week. it's you that gives her hope and lets her feel the presence of god. it must be that god is here with me now. thank you. and i'll say a special prayer of thanks to god. when there's war and violence and brokenness, you and i as christians are chosen to minister to love. you help bring the peace of god that passes all understanding and to know i have something to eat today.

welcome back america the left and the democrats in the media the most important date is january 6 at least with they wanted to be. the most important date on our calendar this year is january 20 when america has a new beginning with the brand-new president. we know this president and know he will be enormously successful and were very excited about the inauguration. mr. president, president trump, god bless you and will be back "life, liberty and levin