tv Life Liberty Levin FOX News March 2, 2025 10:00pm-11:00pm PST
10:00 pm
what i think. >> that promise about the war in europe is not wringing his hands about hapless zelenskyy and he's got a plan i'm saying that quickly because i need you guys to be sure to watch her special coverage of trumps a joint address to congress tuesday night at 9:00 p.m. eastern with bret baier and martha mccalla but less than the show i want to give a shout out to joseph jones my son who killed his role in fiddler on friday. and then run a personal record and track and field on saturday morning. he is working really hard and i appreciate your love you for the very proud of you. >> good for him because that is awesome. >> saint sowell he asked pretty good it's getting better pic looks really talented young man because he is, does not get it for me. that doesn't for us. we will see you next weekend "life, liberty & levin" is up next. ♪ ♪
10:01 pm
♪. mark: hello america i am marco levin this is "life, liberty & levin" sunday. sorry, with this laryngitis it just bear with me too great guest tonight, joe concha and benjamin domenech. before we get to them, saturday before this past saturday i spent the monologue discussing the genius of the trump plan with respect to rare earth minerals in ukraine. and the partnership of ukraine, what would it do? that wouit would involve americn private sector investments, hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars to extract rare earth minerals in ukraine. which for the most part they cannot do it and certainly after a war they cannot do it. which would help ukraine in numerous ways, more than the marshall plan. imagine that capitol flowing
10:02 pm
into ukraine. rebuilding its infrastructure. remember the number of ukrainians getting jobs, the buildings going up, the highways being built. imagine the benefit to the united states not only making money we would have access to rare earth minerals that we need it. we need for our defense. the first basis is submitted for medical industry. rush it once those minerals in addition to geographic ideas, and it claims all of which are ridiculous. put pollution once those minerals. trying it once those minerals. so the idea is we have a real business relationship with the people of ukraine. americans working next to each other. we have a significant presence there. that significant presence there serves as a national security buffer. as i explained last week. so, really it ukrai ukraine wout even need to join nato. you have a special with ukraine
10:03 pm
critical to the united states and critical to ukraine. brilliant. by the administration did not come up with that plan. the democrat party did not come up with that plan. trump came up with that plan. that is number 1. number 2 the blowup that took place in the oval office. i've been thinking about this. people react immediately. i like to think about things a little bit. there are 2 camps that are giddy about this. absolutely giddy. there's nothing to be giddy about. number 1 the democrats. they're all over tv with their democrat media trashing donald trump. accusing him again of the importance of back pocket. that is a lie he is not important as a back pocket and he's never been in putin's back pocket is dealing with reality. he's trying to bring this thing to an end and terms but also improve the situation with the
10:04 pm
united states. number 2, the pro- pollutant forces on the right constitutional concern they're not right wingers that's what the democrats calls we are not right wing anything. her square in the middle of the political spectrum. we are the center of the political spectrum. constitutional conservatism for the radical left, the marxists the fascists we are in the center we need to take the political spectrum back. that said, they are thrilled. they are giddy for they support putin the actual pollution to win. but here is the bottom line. zelenskyy blew it and he blew it big. i speak of someone who supports ukraine. ukraine which was invaded without provocation. ukraine, the cities and people are targeted the infrastructure
10:05 pm
is targeted. you create up to 700,000 of their children, children have been brought into russia against their will, against the will of their parents. adopted out to russian families to become russian citizens. that is right. it is grotesque. i see how little people talk about pooches part how little they talk about his role this war. how little you read about or you hear about it. zelenskyy, you had a putin a victory in only you can fix it. donald trump is offered ukraine and you a lifeline. a lifeline. to build your ties with the united states. to build your economy. to build up your country. so that you can contribute your own defenses as well. but you blew it. you blew it and you need to fix
10:06 pm
it. what was in this deal in part? it was a good deal the preliminary agreement that investment fund will be set up for ukraine's reconstruction. the fund would be managed on equal terms. there is no america coming in and all the rest of it. according to the dealer ukraine will contribute 50% of future proceeds. from state owned mineral resources oil and gas to the fund to pay the fund will then invest to provide the safety, security and prosperity of ukraine. that was the language in this deal. meanwhile, the agreement says the u.s. will subject to u.s. lot maintalot maintain a long-tm financial commitment. to the development of a stable and economically prosperous ukraine. nobody else is going to do this. nobody else can do this. zelenskyy acknowledge and told the bbc last week it was too early to talk about money.
10:07 pm
were not talking about money. or talk about building up your country. your agreement states that u.s. law on the maximum amount of the fund allowed under the u.s. law. ukrainian president rejected in a request from the u.s. for half a trillion dollars. media reports say this has been dropped. dropped. there's coownership, no direct claims on anything. in his wildest dreams zelenskyy should've grabbed this deal. but, before he met with donald trump heat met with a bunch of democrats on capitol hill and others. the stories are broken by michael goodwin of the "new york post." before meeting trump zelensky met with anti- trump democrats. who advised him to reject the terms of the mineral deal, that the present offered according to center chris murphy. this guy is the loathsome
10:08 pm
reprobate from connecticut. he is a cancer in the body politic. he's costly on cable tv trashing trump, trashing elon musk, just trashing every single time that he possibly can. just finished a meeting with president zelenskyy here in washington. this is what murphy posted. confirm the ukrainian people will not support a fake peace agreement. putin gets everything he wants, there are no security arrangements for ukraine. murphy's office posted that at 11:15 a.m. on friday. just an hour before zelensky was meeting with president trump. and then murphy attach a picture of zelensky at a conference table with murphy seated on the opposite side. the purpose of the meeting was to sign the mineral agreement he and trump represented have negotiated. this was supposed to be a formality. he twice refused to sign it after promising to so he will back on the deal multiple times.
10:09 pm
and thanks to murphy we now know he had no intention of signing it on friday when he met with trump. like the original russia hoax that to trust first or russia 2.0 was born a political desperation. so the democrats wanted this. the democrats were trying to sack trump. and zelensky was foolish enough to go along with this and embrace it. zelensky has to fix this for the sake of his own country. so do not worry the western allies, they are rallying around zelensky you know after the event with donald trump says cnn. are rallying around zelensky. you know what america? it's about someone would tell you how pathetic the europeans have been in their support of ukraine. poland has stepped up, the baltic states have stepped up. a few other countries.
10:10 pm
the 4 worst countries are the leaders with the biggest mounts france, britain, germany, italy, although i like but italy. they have not stepped up to the plate like they could and should. why? this is from the cente center fr strategic and international studies by max bergman. europe's approach to supporting ukraine's war effort is no longer fit for purpose. there is a desperate need for europe to ramp up its defense industrial production. but, despite a clear consensus behind this urgent need, european production lines are not maxing out their capacity. the root of the issue is not so much a lack of political will, but as is frequently the case with european defense, a failure to cooperate in a lack of funding. they are all rallying around
10:11 pm
zelensky. talk is cheap. one of the step up and do more? europe has not yet shifted to the new reality that ukraine faces. this is several months ago. now, europe has contributed as a collective point to percent of the gross domestic product. point to percent not even 1%, not even half of a percent. if europeans had to put the entire bill, it would be .4%. in other words if the united states withdrew altogether they would have to double it to .4%. still not even 1% of their gdp. countries are telling us this is a vital defense issue. i happen to think it is. i happen to think it is. he says the new paradigm is urgently needed for europe's military support for ukraine. the challenge is less about incentivizing countries to give weapons to ukraine. it's about getting european
10:12 pm
defense industries to ramp up production. this requires significant new funding, it requires europeans to do something they really do and defense. work together. they have been on loading post world war ii type weapons and some the world war ii weapons ukraine. some new weapons but mostly not. and now that the stockpiles have run out, and now that president trump is the president and not biden, europe has an issue. the war in ukraine has awakened european government they need to invest in defense european defense spending is up across the board with production increases as well. i thought happening at the speed and scale it requires. in this prelude to world war iii they need to step it up. then you step it up. donald trump's idea is a brilliant idea we in gauge with ukraine we build the economy
10:13 pm
while we are building ours. we help exploit their rare earth minerals that we have access to while we access them. we should benefit them. it keeps the russians off their tail and keeps the chinese off their tail. meanwhile for us china, russia, india are all competing throughout the third world third mostly. for these minerals. russia is taking over the arctic circle tent military basis it with the support of china, donald trump says wait that's a huge problem. greenland, you've got minerals. greenland you are there theater navigable waters of the arctic circle. we need to have a new relationship with greenland. so the president sees this he is not-the democrats and more by advising zelensky to kill this deal than anything donald trump could possibly have done.
10:14 pm
for the putin supporters out there, you think you are giddy? you think you are funny? you are pathetic as a matter fact. but let's go on the biggest challenge to establishing what is a european union fund will be getting approval within the european union. complacency and frugality are beginning to take over european politics. and european leaders particular finance ministers are used to claiming helplessness when it comes to funding defense. and so this is the realpolitik america. this is the realpolitik. ukraine is the victim. russia is the aggressor. the families in syria, half a million people russia help slaughter, citizens. ask them. russia under putin has invaded crimea and he stole it from the
10:15 pm
ukraine. before that he invaded the country of georgia install 20% of that. he's got 1000 warheads aimed at us. 1000. he's gohe is got nuclear submarf our shores. he keeps threatening our coast. they keep buzzing our ships. they keep threatening the coast of alaska. they have a presence in central and south america. hypersonic missiles, they have advanced hypersonic missiles aimed at us. they are not aimed at ukraine or anybody else, they are aimed at us. they have a military relationship with china. china's enemy is us that of a military relationship with iran iran's enemy is us that the military relationship with north korea and north korea's enemy is us. you are pathetic your the 1930s isolationist. you democrats are a disgrace, a disgrace and trying to undermine this deal that donald trump is
10:16 pm
putting together. honestly, the only 1 who has a sound policy, the only 1 who has thought this through, the only 1 who has a plan that can work is donald trump. we will be right back. baby: liberty! mom: liberty mutual is all she talks about since we saved hundreds by bundling our home and auto insurance. baby: liberty! biberty: hey kid, it's pronounced "biberty." baby: liberty! biberty: biberty! baby: liberty! biberty: biberty! baby: liberty!
10:17 pm
biberty: bi-be-rty! baby: biberty! biberty: and now she's mocking me. very mature. mom: hey, that's enough you two! biberty: hey, i'm not the one acting like a total baby. mom: she's two. only pay for what you need ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ baby: liberty. food is gina's passion. but diabetes threatened to take that all away. with dexcom g7... gina learned how different foods affect her sugar levels in real time. ...so she doesn't have to choose between the foods that she loves and her health.
10:20 pm
mark: welcome back america we are here with our friend joe concha is a great fox news contribute he's got a book coming out the greatest comeback ever, it's about donald trump. joe concha you would think with the enormity of the finding of thidoge, trump, musk, it is juso incredible the billions and billions and the political payoffs on the ideological payments in the fraud and the waste. it will be so busy. look at the media research center analysis. when you make of this? >> this the biggest reason for lifetime. when your talk about billions upon billions of waste, fraud, corruption, that is on the
10:21 pm
easiest stories to look at and cover. elon musk, doge at the direction of president trump have been impossibly transparent in terms of what they are finding. they put up on their exit feed or have a website for it. all we see from legacy resistance and media is concentrating on elon musk and what a danger he is to democracy. what a fascist donald trump is a. i'm sorry what was left in a fascist government tried to end waste, fraud, corruption in government? what was at less than a fascist government tried to shrink the size of government? fascist government only expand their power. they thrive on fraud, corruption, and abusive. what they're doing right now over doge is a huge story but as usual resistance media goes negative. that building in their dna would come suit donald trump. they're not serving the public. as they pull out just this week
10:22 pm
6 in 10, 60% of americans. independence believe doge is helping. as usual the media says 1 thing, big disconnect in terms of their audience, viewers, readers. mark: is a very important point let me underscore it. the working class and some and new york, i'm in l.a. but mostly in washington d.c. the entire perspective is from that of the bureaucracy and the ruling class. the ruling class created this. do not going to criticize themselves. the ruling class is not going on the money is poured into the government within the government. but, for this meeting we talk about a free press all the time. but this is fundamental. this is media is not a free press is not with the famous had in mind for this media is filled with propaganda and ideologues and democrats. and with all this waste, fraud, abuse is so massive. you would they do not even go and pursue any of it.
10:23 pm
they have not gotten to stacey abrams face and got into it or anybody else for that matter. >> we are talking about billions in the form of stacey abrams and the possible abuse and corruption down in georgia for this is a two-time election denier by the way in stacey abrams that supposed that's posg no-no. but overall in these first 6 months i'm sorry it feels like 6 months these first 6 weeks of the trump presidency, more than 70 executive orders assigned. lots of stories to write about their all the cabinet members confirmed despite the naysayers this mere campaigns we saw in the request the big beautiful budget passed the house the slimmest of margins by the way that it was passed by the scott get kudos to mike johnson house speaker and then we have seen doge, elon musk as you said exposing billions upon billions throughout the whole process based on the numbers this has is been the most transparent administration we have seen by a secretary at proportions very trump has taken nearly 1100
10:24 pm
questions taking office 42 days ago about. compare that to his predecessor who would read statements in a a teleprompter run off reporters faster than sake on barkley the most protected least transparent president ever in joe biden. an out donald trump's approval by the way even though all the negative media coverage the juxtaposition overwhelmingly negative trump's head a had hist approval ever and mannequins have wide majority to break down policies they are overwhelmingly onboard border policy, deportation, drill baby drill, men not competing as women in sports what we are witnessing right now, talk about huge huge stories. if you look at it objectively is the most impactful most translucent first 40 days we have witnessed from any presidency in our lifetime. mark: that is 1 100% rate. a lot of people say it wears a jamming current party going to go the out the gourd that usualo in the gutter. there talk about medicaid cuts
10:25 pm
is not even on the table. we keep repeating it. they're violating violating they violating they don't do that either. so my question to you joe concha what is the future of the democratic party? i want to know from you being the expert in this, what is the future of the corporate media? icy basis is trying to tilt the poster of the los angeles times owner trying to deal with that. i guess msnbc are moving chairs are on the deck of the titanic there. but, from your perspective what is the future of corporate media? we will be right back. where does the time go? where does the time go? until this week, my dad did not know where he was from. i'm african american. i want to know where i come from.
10:26 pm
it means the world to share ancestry® with my dad. so nigeria, this is where it all started. so they've broken it down by regions, by journeys, and by parent. man, this is deep. it adds more complexity to our lives, too. it adds more color. my pops is my fuel, my family, and my community. this is my way of saying thank you to him. (♪)
10:28 pm
force factor nad+ longevity complex, promotes healthy aging, provides cellular energy, and supports longevity. force factor nad+ contains nad+ and powerful, clinically researched antioxidants. take control of your health. search amazon now for force factor nad+. this is where you are. but this...is where you want to go. (♪) we give you the rewards and you choose where they'll take you. (♪) introducing the credit one bank wander american express card.
10:30 pm
levin." mark: will come back america were back with our buddy joe concha what is the future of the corporate media they seem to be spiraling into not nonexistent but who cares? >> irrelevant at this point. saw the start to happen about 8 years ago when i was at the hilton newspaper in washington we looked at 59 major newspaper endorsements between hilary clinton and donald trump. hilary clinton got 57 of the 59 endorsements and donald trump got to put all that got hilary
10:31 pm
clinton was a concession speech and it set of steak knives. people are being told how to vote by all the local newspapers it was ignored anyway. then we saw during this campaign alone where kamala harris is running to al sharpton or jana bash at cnn or to 60 minutes on cbs and donald trump is sitting down with joe rogan doing interviews with mark levin going to different media outlets. he reached non- propensity voters, younger voters, black voters that media strategy ended up being the difference in some stains where it came down to a point or 2 in pennsylvania or wisconsin, michigan, arizona, nevada, georgia, north carolina. the future of media is it will continue to shrink the me more options are people out there. now all i know is more people get their news from places like twitter/x under elon musk which is truly a free-speech platform.
10:32 pm
msnbc 30,000 years and the key 25 and 54 demographic on prime time on weekday nights. during a trump administration there's a lot of news going on. 130,000 is less than the population of fargo, north dakota. memeanwhile fox is taken off sie the election. with it counters our opinion people come here for fax but they get perspective. the other networks is only opinion you really get news but if it is news is disguised as news but it's analysis which is just the anchor's opinion. mark: that is such a good point too. and you note joe concha when you look at this and i can speak for myself, we are really under the radar and it's really kind of stunning. i do a top radio program 5 days a week, 3 hours a day cumulatively millions and millions and millions of listeners. or on satellite, we are on
10:33 pm
youtube, we are podcasts simultaneously, we are in every automobile in the country. we are in every dinner table in the country. i look at our numbers and say the network, they don't even come close to our reach or rogan or a lot of people who are podcasts on talk radio. so they don't even come close. is that the future? >> that iis absolutely future. am radio to be honest when you listen in the cards little static he is 1 thing. but now through my amazon alexa it's perfectly clear when i listen to your cloak or a go for a hike i press 1 button on an app, i have my headphones on and that's where i've listened to all these different podcast and radio shows like yours. and so that is the future. sitting in front of a tv and watching the evening news, especially we have david you see the way he conducted himself during that debates between kamala harris and donald trump but no 1 trusts that guide note
10:34 pm
is going to confuse him with walter cronkite or even peter jennings and norah o'donnell and cbs. she is gone. more big names at networks. chuck todd or jim acosta are all gone now that gone off into irrelevance like don lemon as well. meanwhile the "washington post" under jef jeff bays also say thy want to go back to the center now or they are declaring that. let's see who they hired to do that. the washington post have never endorsed a republican presidential candidate in their history. that means they endors endorsedy carter and walter mondale who won 7 states combined into elections. and so if they want to keep comparing trump to hitler and say democracy dies in darkness although i know is a "washington post" lost $100 million last year hundreds of thousands of subscribers. we are not just talking tv and radio. but in newspapers as well there's a big shift happening. legacy resistance at media, especially in those places is a dying at a very rapid rate. mark: there's a lot of things going on in this country right
10:35 pm
now. think a lot of it is very good for the democratic party and that media are on their back. if we just get back to basics we can revitalize themselves. i see this attack on fraud in government. i see all these things it's all in a positive direction because of the election of trump. joe concha i want to thank you very much my friend. god bless you, brother. >> god bless you as well. take care. mark: we will be right back.
10:36 pm
♪ empower ♪ hey, i got her a little something. a little something, dad? oh, umm. hi. walt rolled his 401k accounts into an empower ira and it's grown nicely. so i say, let a gramps be a gramps. okay, just promise me it doesn't make a lot of noise. (engine roars) (♪) go, baby! go! (♪) thanks, grandpa! get good at money. so you can be a little bad. empower.
10:38 pm
i got this $1,000 camera for only $41 on dealdash. dealdash.com, online auctions since 2009. this playstation 5 sold for only 50 cents. this ipad pro sold for less than $34. and this nintendo switch, sold for less than $20. i got this kitchenaid stand mixer for only $56. i got this bbq smoker for 26 bucks. and shipping is always free. go to dealdash.com right now and see how much you can save.
10:39 pm
mark: welcome back america. were here with our friend benjamin domenech spectator editor at large, fox news contributor. good guy all around. benjamin domenech, my question to you is this. we are looking at major reforms taking place here. this whole doge thing in my lifetime i never thought this would happen.
10:40 pm
this is so fantastic you see a revolution in media. that media are destroying themselves so you see more independent platforms being created and other venues where people are moving so they do not have this oligopoly that they used to have if you may. i am also seeing something else i think that has not been is nos that is problematic. and that is the judiciary. i'm not talking about the supreme court for they keep hammering it, attacking them want to destroy the independents. i'm not talking about that. i am talking about hundreds of federal district judges who think they are national judges who are now outrunning every aspect of the federal government they choose to run without any constitutional or legal authority whatsoever. what you think of this? >> i think you are right as thank you for having me. the problem here is we have have essentially the most powerful entity in government the most powerful branch, the congress
10:41 pm
and not do its job for so long all of these other branches have taken over different aspects of what they are supposed to do. that of course creates a major source of the problems that doge is rooting out. when it comes to the expenditure of taxpayer funds and all manner of things that if congress actually devote on them as opposed to the stupid and terrible continuing resolutions all the time. those things we get spiraled out in accordance with the demands of the voters. but that is not happening so you have to do something like doge to get any kind of change when it comes to the judiciary these judges you are talking about these federal district court judges they stepped in and ways thin waysthat are unprecedenteds of blocking virtually anything the president attempts to do. trying to slow him down. it's essentially the equivalent of a bureaucrat to see a new president come in and say i am going to be around a lot longer this guy i'm going to slow everything down. i'm going to grind the gears and
10:42 pm
prevent his agenda from advancing as long as i possibly can with all manner of regulatory demands and the like. now we are seeing that happen on a more district level from these judges who again say the president could do it he wants and he has his opinion but i'm going to be around for a long time i am going to try to throw a wrench into anything that is done. the content of websites that is the most ridiculous to see reported about judges who think they have the authority to do that. the real problem for america. it's 1 of the reasons why you need to have a real solid look in this term of a president trump second term the judicial reform that a number of folks have recommended on the right over the years. mark: i am 1 of them i wrote an entire book on occult men in black. here is the thing the lower courts were created by congress. they are not in the constitution's feder is federalt
10:43 pm
courts. it just seems to me, particularly in these heavy duty democratic areas congress can literally at least begin the process of trying to do something about it too. moving the districts moving the judges eliminating some of the judges, eliminating some districts and dare i say they actually have the ability to in federal law deny certain jurisdiction to the judges they create. i think it everything should be on the table because look at what the radical judges are doing. >> that is something that's going to require some intestinal fortitude from republicans in d.c. who i think got way too comfortable over the years with not offending the "new york times" and that type of folks. your argument on this is 1 that i am familiar with and others as well these is simply are not constitutionally supported in terms of their existence.
10:44 pm
we need to wind this back. the judiciary should not have so much control over our lives. that is something that needs to be addressed and hopefully will within this term because it has a very long-term ramifications for our government and the way we can get back to government by the people. mark: for those who say particularly left-wing law professors who do not have an ounce of integrity pray for them who say and mark you defend the independence of the supreme court yes the supreme court is in the constitution. these other courts are not they are a creation of congress. so it is a big difference that yes we defend the independence of all the courts. that's papray that'spart of the. isn't also part of the problem with certain republicans who just rubberstamp these nominees every time they come up. i think lindsey graham is 1 of the senators who has said the president has a right to his choice. no, no, no. we have a right, the people to somebody is going to be a judge
10:45 pm
and not an activist. biden and obama have put these radicals throughout the federal judiciary. >> we have to be clear either way the judiciary works et cetera break with the way it supposed to work. quite frankly it should not have the kind of power that it does over policy choices that are made, it should be made by the congress that pit should be made by the present and the executive branch. that is what people expect. when those judges get in the way of these policies i think we have to have a conversation about reform because so many activists have taken over these rules they've really driven policy in a way they are not supposed to from the bench. mark: and we come back benjamin domenech my question to you is this, donald trump historic, iconic, president of the united states? yes or no? we will be right back.
10:49 pm
10:50 pm
things are not like bill clinton used to do. this is not school uniform this is right a at the left control f the culture right at the left control of the political system. perfectly legal, perfectly constitutional what he is doing. it is happening so fast or just not sure how to respond. how do you respond? >> look, mark, i had the opportunity to the first print magazine entered wi interview we president in the oval office just the other day. it was a question i led off the conversation with. when you feel the need to come in that mood with the spieth were the lessons you took from the first go around that affected and change the approach you are using on the second go around? and the answer was really he said when he arrived in
10:51 pm
washington last time he really did not know what he was getting into. the array of vicious people coming after him. the type of election you have coming out on election to get things done. this is clearly what he has been doing in terms of its applications in so many different areas of policy pre-scaring the bureaucrats of the year across. that is something i think is healthy and good. but it's 1 of the reasons i think he is going to be successful in the second term because he's learned a lot of lessons from last 1. and you know what else? i asked him a question about richard nixon. almost as many enemies as he has. i think that type of the way they went after him personally
10:52 pm
and through every means necessary. i think his abuse and now are much clearer on who is friend and who is foe. who he can trust, who he can work with and that's 1 of the reasons he's approaching these things by moving so fast and breaking so many things. >> i think when we look at him and nonow, i try to look in th future. i look back to the future and think look at all of the presidents. we truly have never had anyone like him in the oval office. he wins an election and wins election after he has been out of office. again, so rare the effort to kill him, the effort you put them in prison, and the effort to bankrupt him did not work. and now, here he is. i think he is more motivated as a reason of all of these efforts, to kill him, to stop them, to bankrupt him to
10:53 pm
whatever they were trying to do they otherwise would be. i think he's a very incredible historical figure in this regard, don't you? what's a devil i think he's going to way by historians. i don't think there's any doubt about it the political comeback he pulled off was incredible. he really survived personal attacks get back into the office of never seen before the american presidential level nothing like this to the degree these out-of-control prosecutors and frankly these people who told a lot of lies in order to try to bankrupt him in particular the ridiculousness of the valley of mar-a-lago and all of that. one of the things i think is true is he is facing a lot of challenges in the second term. whether he is able to match them and meet them in this moment to guide the country through them, that is going to be a phenomenal achievement if he can do it.
10:54 pm
i think he is committed to doing everything he can to achieve it that includes the challenges around the world of china, of russia, of mexico and the middle east. our contentious relationship right now with the eu and the like. and that of course also includes a challenges here at home. some of those areas, he's already having enormous success for the bord.the border policy e showed everything that happened under joe biden and mayorkas and the like. not every area of policy along those lines can be addressed so quickly. so we'll have to see what comes forward but in terms of what he's already achieved, you have to consider iconic in terms of america's political history. mark: you make a good point and it is a warning to all of us. these people who want to destroy him or destroy his agenda are crippled in 1 form or another, they are not going away. they're going to reappear they are trying to figure how to do it. they never go away. tierney never goes away. >> 1 quick point on that, i
10:55 pm
think those comments from cbs and the depiction of the german censorship on 60 minutes is a sign of how the left is already thinking which is as soon as we get any manner of control again you're going to censor, propagandize and try to silence the people who made a difference this past election by donald trump frankly going around them and talk into pod casters. talking to different audiences appealing to them through different means and the old legacy media. they are going to fight back and though it's going to fight back is by censor and propagandize the american people. >> is called tierney we've seen it before in other country. we've seen in this country. benjamin domenech thank you my friend, god bless you brother. >> great to be with you as always, mark. mark: we will be right some people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance by checking allstate first. like you know to check first that you bought seats in the right section. kansas fans, get on your feet! so check allstate first for a quote
10:56 pm
10:57 pm
or a second row seat. maybe even a third. life doesn't come with an owner's manual. so get out there and write your own. during the jeep presidents' day sales event, get 10% below msrp for an average of $5,700 under msrp on these 2024 jeep wrangler models. see your local jeep brand dealer today. force factor nad+ longevity complex, promotes healthy aging, provides cellular energy, and supports longevity. force factor nad+ contains nad+ and powerful, clinically researched antioxidants. take control of your health. search amazon now for force factor nad+.
10:58 pm
10:59 pm
at university of phoenix. my wife gina was born to be a chef. exploring new foods is her passion. but diabetes threatened to take that all away. then gina got dexcom g7... ...now she can see how food affects her sugar levels in real time. with dexcom g7... she doesn't have to choose between the foods that she loves... and her health. i can't wait to see what she creates next. you know it's going to be good. ♪ >> welcome back. i know the strain on my voice was a strain on your ears.
11:00 pm
i apologize. but the content was extremely important at least for this program. so i'm here. i think donald trump has the right plan for peace. mineral's deal i feel will get done. will get down. zelenskyy needs to step up and i think donald trump will respond when he does. the democrats are saboteur tores and puts party first and country second and they're at it again. the pro putin cheerleaders in the country are a disgrace and the cheer leereds in the 1930s and 40s in this country. dismiss them but trump's got the plan and that's a good plan. we'll see you next week on life, liberty, and levin. ♪ shannon: i am a shannon bream. follow-up from tensions when
0 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d741/6d741ad05315b68d02eb928186214a3daefe87c1" alt=""