edition. thanks to my panel. we hope to see you right here next week. on fox news watch, a plan to eliminate al-qaeda bad guys as congress and the press out ranged, but why? a nominee gets a grilling from the senate. >> you are going to be a great supreme court justice. >> did the press learn anything? the presidents health care plan is making headlines. murder in the south shakes a florida town and presses plays a roll in the investigation. the media cheered when americans landed on the moon. are they still cheering today? >> on the panel this week, jane hall of the american university. bill salmon and managing editor of fox washington bureau, jim

pinkerton, fox forum contractor and judy miller. i'm john scott and fox news watch is on right now. >> i think that it's behooves the committee to take whatever actions they believe are necessary to get more information on that subject as to whether the intelligence community was directed by the vice president to create a program and intentionally withhold that information from congress. >> nancy pelosi talking about reports that the c.i.a. had developed an anti-terrorist proposal to train assassination teams to take out al-qaeda leaders. the plan initially had been hidden from members of congress it is alleged at the instruction of vice president cheney.

they reported the plan on monday after c.i.a. director leon paneta informed the congress that he had scrapped the plan. the plan had been on and off since 2001. leon paneta found out about it he cancels it but immediately it's in the press. is it any wonder there are people he wanted to keep it secret? >> that's true. but the timing is this. the republicans were about to rest recollect nancy pelosi accusing the c.i.a. of lying to her. they were going to use the opportunity of the intel authorization bill. to head that off, democrats jumped up and said, couple weeks ago paneta briefed us about secret program. think was from khairn any. so the focus now is talking about the evils of cheney. >> media manipulation?

>> i think the media has swallowed hook, line and sinker. >> think the media has not bought it. from the ufg ton post on the left to andrew mccarthy and national review everybody is raising questions about what is the big deal here. this was a plan, into the program. the president signed an executive order. it's been known since 2001. what is going on here? >> it was in the washington post on october 28th, 2001, six weeks after 9/11. most americans after 9/11 and frankly to this day would want to know that we're out there trying to kill bin laden and all the rest of them. i think was the real story here is that the democrats in the house led by the ultimate san francisco democrat nancy pelosi have a hatred for dick cheney and the new jersey community overall.

this is mindless attempt to throw bombs at them. they would love to put dick cheney in jail. they will settle for blowing up the american intelligence committee. >> let me try to disagree. i doubt it was that organized. i do think a lot of people,. a lot of people have been saying presidents have been have done this before. and we were trying to kill fidel by blowing up cigars. panetaf finds out about it, he briefed congress. i'm not sure i buy this scenario that it's all about nancy pelosi. cheney pushed the c.i.a. and its proven. >> paneta did not do anything devious. he heard about it. it was the democrats that leaked that to one, take attention away

from pelosi around also eric helder can move forward prosecution about bush era crimes. so the press write about these the tortured eric holder, on the other hand, president obama wants to look forward and not backward. so it's the opportunity to look both ways. we're going to have an investigation, mark my word. judy is shaking her head. let me read a quote about how leaks happen when it comes to national security. here is the line. our national security and intelligence world has been turned so upside-down depending on the ideology and motivation of the leaker and the paper that reports it one can actually win a pulitzer prize. is nothing sacred any more?

>> our sensitivity about national security is really reduced every day as the distance from 9/11 creos. you can see that more and more, we're having fights over national security because that memory of what it is to be, media thinkss it's fair game. they run the leaks. it's a new ballgame. we're in the post, post 9/11 era now. >> everybody has forgotten. it's a lot like what happened after vietnam when the committee was investigating the c.i.a. the difference then is the war was over. difference now is the war is going on. we are in the process of shutting down our intelligence operations while al-qaeda is still on the loose. >> one of these days, if there is another terrorist attack, we're going wake up to headlines what happened? why didn't we know about this coming? >> i see this in a ditched way.

first after all, it hasn't worked when we tried this. we've tried this. a lot of what was done or tried to be done in the name of national security actually is undermined our security. you can look at this and i don't agree that dick cheney should be getting a pass on this at all. >> all right. we're going to take a break. we have lots of extras available on our website including some of the spirited discussions that erupt during our commercial break. go to fox news.com/foxnewswatch.

ok. oomph. i'm a mommy. i love kids! i'm responsible,

loving, nurturing. oooph. momma's coming, baby! [panting, grunts] ah! ah! ahhhh! all: mamma! [baby dinosaurs laugh] sid: [laughs] ha ha, no, stop, stop.

and him some votes from those is abandoning hope of coming back as a political party. are going to do a good job. esthink senator sessions did a good job, senator cornyn did a good job, but they weren't mean. they were polite and thoughtful. i think they realized, as we all do, that the media did their best to confirm her months ago for this job. and therefore the natural opportunities for drama or dareh for example, frank ricci h should've been the anita hill of these hearings. the whistleblower who blows her out of the water on the

injustice done to them as a firefighter. narmada mccorvey, jane roe of roe vs. wade should have been an anita hill like figure and theyt went because the media said oh t no, she's a moderately bit thatb jamaica washington post were compiling how many blinks she gave. during certain answers. it seems like the coverage got a little vacuous at times ; the washington post lead. one day it said the sotomayor sought to reframe critics or trail of her as ani judge swayed by her gender and ethnicity. please, she completelyexpl contradicted herself and shea tried to explain away her wise latino remark by saying she o didn't really mean it. r and instead of sort of holding our feet to the fire, the post disorder generally said she sought to reframe the accusations of heren critics. i think republicans did a prette good job of getting theiran arguments in there. it was predicted she would bepl untouchable because you can't resize latina, you lose the voters. he put more intelligent than that. you can make legitimate

arguments member when they had alito in there, they called him a racist to the point where his wife started crying and had to leave the room.e so why below the belt they stucc to the substance and cases and her speeches and it was a respectful, legitimate debate tonight i think the republicans were undercut by newt gingrich and pat buchanan and all these people who said right out of the box she was a w racist. the media ran with this wise't latino thing. it was in the first stories out of context. i don't think she really answered. "time" magazine, sue palin is a wonderful legal affairs writer, meet the sotomayor ours, which is me both sides how can she be speeches that her record is judicial restraint. it is true i think conservatives judicial activism is usually described as liberal i think that over plans by calling her a reverse racist. she was almost in a weird way getting a sympathy vote at this point to make in the media to do

diligence tickets and i think they tried. 583 questions later we still didn't know very much about her judicial philosophy or the incendiary comment because she just walked away from it. if she says gee, i didn't really mean that and it was just a rhetorical source, when she made the point that she said it repeatedly but now she doesn't say it, where to go with it or it may have nowhere to go.ft >> she said it ater least five times. >> after clarence thomas was presented in the media, is that why you don't really get anything out of the supreme court nominees anymore if you. >> i think one reason is every non--- none of the conservative mindset upkeep of bland, don't answer questions, say this is something i might have to rule on so i can't go there. you think she contradicted herself on was the club where she said the circuit court is where you make policy, and sheet was confronted with that and she said no, so she is directly p contradicting herself. and i do think the press did an okay job covering this, and the tv stations have a lot of these hearings on, and i think it was

a tennis for charlotte michael jackson stuff. we get serious now. >> i was going to say in terms of media coverage, it would have been nice if people for the american what smeared frankit ritchie would be nice for ao w reporter to ask people for the american way what contacted him at the white house juju would you discuss this with an advance if anybody. it would be useful to know i if white house was involved in trashing her opponents and accessing a public show praise, we had planned feinstein earlier in our same figure of the greats supreme court justice. how do she now so mayor hasn'tr said anything in hearings and mac to be fair, bill is making the point that alito ando roberts, a lot of people think we did get a sense of how they w will rule. in theory they're not supposed to tell us how they will rule but this is a political process and people want to know where she stands on the road the way.

after is a great question about 21st century technology and she didn't answer but neither did alito and roberts. >> she talked about cameras in i the courtroom and internet regulation, and i think even terry mason. >> nunchucks.liv manhunt comes to the media, i issue one who is likely to try to regulate you get the great ticket.n't >> a topic without much of a sense of where she's going to come on any issue, which is why she was such a perfect, perfect witness. if you can't pin her down, you can't hold their feet to the fire. republicans, we don't have some sympathy. they were in a terrible position onea this one. if you really sock it to hurt your going to alienate every hispanic voter in the country. no, they were going to go there and the media also -- and she in a girl. spinach is on most experienced people that's been nominated in recent years. 'and tried to say she was an affirmative action hire, and i think that's not true to matches that on the federal bench for long time. time for another great but first

we would like your help. story ideas are welcome here, especially if you come across a story that shows media bias. e-mail us at newsletter foxnews.com and will be back with us. senator john crime shakes a florida town that such airport to solve the heinous murders, to the press hurt or help to give. >> to the moon. >> the eagle has landed to make the media and the first moon landing. it's all next on this watch. *flush @ @ ted in skyscrapers a.

but on the ground by those who could see what needed to be done. volunteers who in service stepped forward... onto the dust of the moon, a levee in the heartland, the marble steps of a dream. you may ask yourself: "where is my moon, my levee, my dream?" well, it's here...

i would like to thank the media that the sheriff has released. sheriff and i both believe that >> this community and the media for posting information t-shirt has released. the sheriff and i w both believe appreciate that. >> did you hear that?

a rare moment of praise from a public official. in this case a florida state attorney talking about the murders of byrd and melanie billings. couple known for adopting children with special needs, shot to death in their luxury home. that is a pretty rare moment in journalism where they thank the media. did they deserve it here? >> it's the good ole days. yes, i think they helped and it was a good old-fashioned crime story, one which is the media played the normal role which it was dig up facts. in this case there is a still a lot we don't know. i think they did very well. i'm glad to hear a good word said about us. >> they got the story out there which helped result in an arrest. >> one journalism professor described the story as a crime reporter's dream. is it? >> i'm a little uncomfortable

when i read the article. parents of 17 children died. media has been covering it. it's horrifying story. i know it's kind of like saying michael jackson's is a report's dream. >> i think it's not a choice of words that reads very well. >> right. let's also note that the sheriff of the county, david morgan was calling the case a humdinger, it was odd that someone in charge of investigating the crime is basically touting the news value of the revelations, it almost makes you think he is looking for a book contract. >> and another story, democrats' plan for health care reform. take a listen to the pot wednesday. >> let me be clear -- if you like your doctor or health care provider, you can keep them.

if you like your health care plan, you can keep that, too. but here is what reform will mean for you, this is for home people that has health insurance. you will save money. if you lose your job or start a new business, you'll be able to find quality health insurance that you can afford. >> should we be writing these things down? >> absolutely. i think the press by and large supports this measure and is sympathetic. >> does the press know what this measure is? >> in fairness, in recent days, the press is coming around to the mounting evidence that this bill is in trouble. i think as much as the press would like to see it passed they can't resist a good story where democrats are fighting among themselves, deficit is qua druip

link so i think they are covering this in a good way. >> house ways and means passed a $544 billion plan to pay for it with taxes. does that deserve a little coverage? >> it does. it's gotten some. i think bill is right, i think washington post so that washington becomes all the more important took ceo study what it would cost. they put that on the front page of the news story about this, quote, devastating. >> president's poll numbers are starting to drop. one poll in ohio, pretty important state, had him at 49% approval rating. lowest in any state. is it because of health care? is it because of the tax issues

generally? >> it's because he is far more popular than his programs. that is why it's important press for him. if he manages to get this through on the strength of his personal charisma, it's going to be a big win for him. >> i think stimulus fatigue and billions fatigue. american people have a huge supported for health care reform. but the next wave is how much it's going to cost and goldman sachs had a big profit. i'm not sure it will work. >> one more break -- when we come back, to the moon. >> an historical moment, an american success and the press was along for the ride. has anything changed in 40 years? that next, on news watch.

healthy hair is soft, silky. and you can get it. fabulous, healthy hair. all you need is pantene.

salon names and fancy packaging are nice, but you don't need it. even experts agree. it's damage protection results leading salon brands can't beat. trust me on this, the blow dryer, the curling iron, and the flat iron, and my hair's still shiny. pantene moisture renewal. healthy makes is happen.

still gives me chills, thursday mark 40th anniversary ts mpollo 11pa this monday marks four decadess since the one stall step for man, an american. >> the eagle has land. >> the nation and the world watched riveted as the unitednt states won the space race,a some ofg the soviet union to the moon. eadlines from 40 years ago, compiled by the museum in washington and they brought it all into america's living room. >> armstrong is on the moon, kneel armstrong, 38-year-old american standing on the surface of the moon. >> 40 years later, has the press gone from champions of american

achievement to sin ix? those days, american first and journalists second? these days it seems awfully hard to get the media to back american achievements as universally as they did with apollo 11? >> i think walter cronkite was the key figure. he was very much interested. he wanted to go there even as an old man. we had vietnam, we had watergate. the government lied to me. journal ivts grow up thinking the government lied to us. >> i think that is right. everything has changed. we were talking about national security and a rather cavalier attitude. there was a moment after 9/11 and the press came together. once again the role of media is to question. if your mother loves you, check it out. sit good?

>> so if the moon landing were to take place today, how would it be covered? >> between jane and judy, they were landing on green cheese. >> no, that's not true. >> tom wolf explained how nasa had the presses as cheerleaders. i don't think it's changed much. press doesn't like liberating 50 million muslims overseas but they provide uncritical coverage of the nasa missions. it's got the "g" tone to the coverage and nobody talks about how much it cost or whether that money could be spent else where better. i think we're all in the tank for nasa. >> at least we're in the same for some things. that is something to think about as we put a wrap on news watch this week. i want to thank, jane hall, jim