we have to walk before we run. [captioning made possible by fox news channel] captioned by the national captioning institute ---www.ncicap.org--- >> three, two, one, beck! glenn: welcome to the glenn beck program. tonight, an incredible update onto cash for clunkers disclaimer that forced car dealers to give the federal government their computers as federal property. also, we're going to go czar gazing. wait until you hear what we found on some of some of obama's newest appointed czars. these are frightening people and you have to answer one question tonight, and, is america waking up? i think they are. they are giving congressmen an earful during their listening tours. some of them don't seem to be listening. oh, they will. i promise you video that you just want to see. you're not going to want to miss this. if you believe this country is great, and you don't think a disclaimer should steal your right to property and privacy,

stand up and come follow me! well, hello, america. well, that is one ugly guy. holy cow, that's me! hello and welcome to the program. apparently last friday, i committed the ultimate sin in the liberal blogging world. mom, i'm working on a blog right now! yeah, apparently i questioned a government program. how could you possibly do that? cash for clunkers has orwellian wording that is creepy and anybody that isn't creeped out isn't paying attention. that's just the problem here. i brought that up. the liberal blogs went nuts. oh, that crazy conspiracy theorist glenn beck. really, it is a conspiracy? i mean, it was riert there.

hello! yeah, in that faux news, yeah. apparently the obama administration is filled with a bunch of crazy right-wing paranoid nut jobs, because that's what i was called all weekend long. i was called a loon, a freak, a conspiracy theorist, blah blah blah. apparently the obama administration agrees with me. yeah, well, they may not agree with me, but they don't want any more heat. i've got good news for you, america. it started through our constitutional watchdogs, which, by the way, i am seeing just how awake you really are. my gosh, this country is starting to wake up and there is great hope! we are getting so many leads, like the one we got on friday in the cash for clunkers program. this lead came from a watchdog when the dealers log on to their cash for clunkers program, the website,

cars.gov/dealers prompted them with this warning. "this application provides access to the d.o.t. cars system. when logs on to the cars system, your computer is considered a federal computer system, and is property of the united states government. users have no explicit or implicit expectation of privacy. any or all uses of this system and all files on this system may be intercepted, monitored, recorded, copied, audited, inspected and disclosed to authorized cars, d.o.t. and law enforcement personnel as well as authorized officials of other agencies, both domestic and foreign. by using this system, the user consents to such interception monitoring, copying, recording, auditing, inspection and disclosure at the discretion of cars or the d.o.t. personnel." why in god's name would anyone ever click on "accept" after

that disclosure? other than you just sold a bunch of cars at a wildly discounted rate and you have to get your money back from the federal government, but other than that, why would you do it? apparently you and i were not the only ones who thought this was ridiculous. here is the good news. an hour ago we received a statement from the administration, and here it is, quote "a security warning on the cars.gov support page that stated computers logged into the system were considered property of the federal government has been removed. we are working to revise the language. the language was posted on the portion of the website accessible by car dealers and not the general public." i'll get into that in a second. oh, that crazy glenn beck news. apparently we must have had a decent point, because the old statement that the liberal bloggers spent another dateless weekend defending has been changed to remove the pesky little part about the

government owning private computers that this show had a problem with on friday. i wonder if those liberal blogs are the same ones that called me crazy and paranoid and are now making the same accusations against the obama administration? i don't hear them. of course, there are yeses that remain unanswered. well, why did they have that wording in the first place? will the changes be retroactive to include all the dealers who have already agreed to that last waiveer? we're going to be looking for those answers, but first, america, pat yourself on the back. you made a difference. this story was brought to my attention by a listener who took the time to e-mail me when he read that waiver, because it just seemed so wrong. he sent us the tip. we investigated. we agreed. he was a watchdog. i tell you that i would tell you his name, but a lot of tips are coming in and a lot

of them want to remain anonymous. they have a little bit of fear in their life. here's the great news. one person made a difference. don't ever let anyone tell you you don't make a difference. white house policy was changed, not by me, not by fox news, not by anything, but by one single person standing up and saying "this isn't right," one person who was so fed up with an out-of-control government that they decided to be a constitutional watchdog and they sent me the news through twitter. good job. keep it up, watchdogs. we'll watch. you let us know what's going on. now, here's fox senior judicial analyst judge andrew napolitano. judge, first of all, this is good news. >> this is great news. glenn: except when you think it through, because then you think, well, wait a minute. they already have all the dealerships they wanted. are they going to change that retro actively? >> or are they still enter

ring private computers even though they don't have the wording up there? it is a portion of the patriot act that they are permitted to write their own search warrants. they don't have to go to a judge anymore. glenn: i have to disagree with you on. this i'm not a fan of the patriot act. the only reason i went along with the patriot act at the time was it had a sunset. after we got past the hysteria, i said, get out of this thing. this is a nightmare, but even the patriot act, you still have, a, i think it's every six months you have to come in front of congress, and if there has been any abuses, they have to answer for it. >> that is true. that is true. glenn: the second part of the patriot act is it's my understanding that yes, they can write their own warrant, you know, they can say we need to eavesdrop on this

telephone, but sthe have to -- but they have to bring that after the fact to a federal judge and if that person doesn't make a good case, that person's butt is in a sling. >> that's the law that they have to go to a federal judge after they do the non-judicial search warrant. in the patriot act case, it never goes to a judge, and if they don't use the information that they have gotten from you against you in a public courtroom, you don't even know they have it. that's why my question is how do we know that they're not doing it? all we know is they took the disclaimer. they took the warning down. glenn: how can we find that out, judge? >> you can only find out that the government has copied your keystrokes or entered your computer if an expert can address the computer for you or if the government prosecutes you for something that's on the computer, then they have to reveal to you how they got it. glenn: let me bring in john lucich, president of e-forensics, a computer forensics company. you're a guy who can tell us

if the government is watching? >> absolutely. in fact, there are ways to prevent the government from doing what they want if you put intrusion protection systems. glenn: hang on a second before we get into this, because i don't want to go down the paranoid express here. >> right. glenn: i mean, i have always been a guy who trusted my government. i stopped trusting it in the bush years. they did too many things that just didn't make sense, but i don't want to get into this. do either of you guys believe that the government is, right now, getting into computers and monitoring computers? >> well, i absolutely believe that they are. >> i believe it is their intention. people put things in writing. they're trying to get you to waive your rights, and for government to do that to its own citizens to provides services that the taxpayers themselves pay for is unconscionable. >> that's why the fourth amendment requires the judicial oversight, not to stop the government from doing its job, but to make sure it only goes after people after whom there is evidence against

them, and that it follows its own procedures. glenn: that was the problem with this thing. they are coming out and saying we just want to make sure there is no fraud. well, that's a fishing expedition. >> well, the government prosecutes people for hacking into other people's computers. they are hacking into our computers. they should obey the same laws as the rest of us. glenn: show me how this can be done. show me how you know if the government is doing this? here is what happens. for them to do that, there is a communication going back and forth. one of the way hackers get in is to load these programs, what they're called trojans, into your computer, do high-speed key word searches, and then take the data they want and transmit that small chunk of data back to exactly where it is coming from. i think the problem with the warn something that it is so broad and ambiguous that we don't know exactly what they want to do, but the fact they worded it that reason is for reason, to give them the ability to do it. again, that's unconscionable.

glenn: again, i'm convinced that this government, this administration, through these czars especially, they're building something piece by piece. they're putting it in bill after bill after bill. they're building something. i can't understand for the life of me what they're trying to get at here that makes any sense. if you think there is fraud, you get a subpoena. that is what you do. why was all this put in there? >> why waste the time to get a subpoena from a grand jury or a search warrant from a judge when you can do it on your own? glenn: i understand that, that pesky thing called the constitution. judge, do you have any idea -- or, jon, maybe you would know, do you have any reason why this warning, the way it was written before, does that allow it to be some sort of a worm that it never stops? in other words, i'm on my computer. i'm the dealer, and i'm putting in your information. i'm on-line now. if i go out to another website or if somebody e-mails something to me, and i'm

exchanging anything with them, does this warning allow them to come out from that dealer's computer and say, oh, well, you're networked, you're part of this one, too? >> when you take a look at their wording, it violates -- other than the fact they try to get you to waive your rights, it violates the privacy communications act, title i and title ii. the act prevents government from intercepting communications of private citizens. title ii stops the government, nobody else, stops the government from intercepting store communications. >> it tries to get you to give up your constitutional rights, your basic right to privacy under the fourth amendment. you can't give up those rights unless a judge in a courtroom accepts their reason for invasion. glenn: i looked for this story. i looked for this story in newspapers -- did you see it anywhere? >> no, not anywhere. glenn: we did it on friday. one broadcast, this amount of

time, and this thing spread like wildfire. we asked the white house for a response, why are you doing this? what does this mean? they came out this afternoon and said, we're going to change that, we're working on t we have removed it from the website. obviously they got their hand caught in the cookie jar, or just based on this one tip show, enough people said whoa, whoa, whoa, what does that mean? >> here is the question for the white house, most respectfully, you have taken the warning down, have you stop the getting into the dealer's computers? >> i read a lot of liberal blogs this weekend and i wonder hod would pick this up? why is this the only show that talks about a lot of these issues? i'm looking at them and they're all saying, oh, this is just conspiratorial, blah blah blah, and i don't want to be conspiratorial by any stretch of the imagination. that hurts us as a nation. we must be routed in the

truth, but when nobody is asking the questions that seem logical, of course you're going to get conspiracy theories, but here is the one thing that i think is important that people kept saying -- this just affects the dealers. well, no, it doesn't, not if i buy a car. if i've got any kind of information. wouldn't there be a class action lawsuit if that dealer has information on me, and it's released to the government, i have and expectation of privacy with my car dealer, do i not? >> here is another problem with that. the fact is sometimes dealers work from home and work from a computer that is shared with their kids and wives. they don't have the right to waive the privacy of their wife or children, ok, but by logging into that system, accepting that, if they with able to download something on a computer and take that data, you are now violating the rights of other people who haven't waived their rights. >> so by getting into the dealer's computer, it could almost be viral in terms of the other individuals who have no dealing with the dealer who

have their privacy violated. >> and one more point. this may not be the white house themselves but maybe it is the administration testing the waters in an environment where they know most of the media doesn't beat up on this administration, and they figured it would never get this far except for your show, glenn. glenn: i have to tell you, these are yeses that i have never asked -- these are questions that i have never asked myself because i have always been in a position of trust, but when you see the next segment, america, with the czars, six months into this administration we are, and we have as many czars as we have had presidents in the history of this nation. we don't even know who they are, and when you see their resumes, when you see what these people have said, it's not crazy to ask questions, like that's crazy, that the president of the united states is going to have a communist as a czar. yes. it's crazy that the president of the united states is going to appoint somebody who, you know, actually advocated sterilizing the water supply

with chemicals. yes! so, is it crazy to say, wait, wait, wait, what are they doing with our privacy act? >> i don't think so. here is another point. they banged the bush administration for listening to listening in on domestic phone lines for terrorists, but this is on the people themselves. >> using the power that the bush administration acquired and left to them. glenn: let me tell you something, america, we must stop playing with these parties. the bush people were doing the same thing. they were standing up for things that didn't make any sense. the obama people standing up for things that don't make sense. damn it! we're americans, we're not democrats, we're not republicans, we're not independents. we're americans! value your freedom. we are the only people in the world that have ever had real freedom. that is the historic anomoly, freedom. slavery is the way the world usually is.

don't let them get away with it by playing party politics, either side, republican or democrats. the parties are meaningless. freedom is what counts. the czars, next. ñ

. .

cwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcococwcwcw

glenn: notes since the russian glory dazes of the 19th century have so many czars been so popular. i seem to remember they all died in the woods. president obama has had at least 44 czars, and i'm not sure when america decided saying, you know, hey, czar, that's kind of cool, you know, and we left the really creepy zone to being the new hip thing, czars, but obama has gone crazy with the appointments. he now has the high nest recent history. even senator robert byrd, former klan member is freaked out. he was freaked out about the influx of czars citing concerns over the fact that they don't answer to anybody. i'm more concerned with the fact that seemingly every single one of these guys shares one common thing -- they all have nut job beliefs, like putting sterilization in

drinking water, legal rights for animals, forced abortions. there is at least one communist that i know. the collective es mays of these czars has me on my knees every night praying for the run-of-the-mill socialist to be appointed! is president obama picking these czars -- here's the question, and there are only two reasons he would do this. oh, who is it, that nut job marxist guy, i hated him in college, can't we appoint him to an ambassadorship and get him out of my face? sorry, sir, we're out of ambassadorships. so he appoints them as a czar. or, is he selecting these people because they have one thing in common? he is selecting these guys because he wants them to hold positions of real power? simple question, and we demand an answer from the administration.

do the czars wield real power or are they just some joke from his beer drinking buddies from college? joining me is michelle malkin, author of "culture of corruption." michelle, let's just go over some of these czars that people i don't think really have an idea. let's start with the information czar. >> this is a guy named david cundra and this guy was a convicted shoplifter, stole a couple of shirts from j.c. penney's and is yet now overseeing very sensitive infrastructure in our information technology. glenn: i have no problem if you are 21 and go shoplifting, et cetera. everyone makes a mistake. hey, i have never shoplifted but i have done some things i'm not proud of, but there is no oversight on this. the senate has not ratified these people. >> that's right. glenn: we isn't heard, are you a reformed person or not?

>> that's right. they didn't put the screws to them. they didn't put the questions to them. the white house did not disclose this until one of my blogs disclosed the criminal background. yes, we all do stupid things, but this guy in addition to the shoplifting tried to evade the police and was a fugitive. glenn: can i ask you something? this one bothers me, because for the same reason as as sandy berger and the same reason for tim geithner. he was avoiding income tax. he now runs the i.r.s., and the excuse was there's nobody better. sandy berger, when he went in and took documents out of his pants, that was both bush and clinton. they were both in on that. >> yes. glenn: something was very wrong with that. he didn't even lose -- he loses his classified status, for, what, two years, three years? >> and then he's back in the mix. glenn: there's something wrong here. let me go to the health czar, nancy depearl.

she is making quite a lot of money. >> yes. glenn: what does she do? >> she made upwards of $6 million over the last couple of years as a consultant, lobbyist for the healthcare industry, in everything but, in the most technical term, and is also a member of the board of directors of many health healthcare companies. she was going in with people kicking and screaming about a corporate person in charge of this. glenn: i don't care about the pundits or anybody on t.v. or in washington but where are the good democrats, the normal people that thought these things were wrong before? where are you? >> and where is the transparency? the healthcare industry executives have been meeting in secret with the white house. it was only under threat of a lawsuit, and i will give credit to a left wing progressive crew, crew, that forced the white house to expose who those were. a counsel of the white house refuses to say which administration official met

with those executives. i find out there are many of these executives that have clear and direct financial ties, have given money to nancy for speaking fees an engagements. i want to know, did she meet with those executives? if not, did she recuse herself glenn: imagine that if that was an oil company. >> exactly. glenn: we are under a minute. carol browner, computer files, she destroyed computer files? >> she d the landmark legal foundation sued her and a federal judge in that case found her guilty, her and her agency guilty of, quote, un quote, bad conduct for avoiding a foya request. >> i don't know what that means. >> it's bad. glenn: is was a rowdy nationalist in 1992. by august, i was a communist. i met radical people of color, really radical, communists and anarchists and it was, like, this is what i need to be a part of. he has never taken this back. he is the guy who his poll low

project designed the stimulus package. >> that's right. as you said on your show, it is underwritten by far left radicals like the tides foundation. that's another problem with these czars. you have hard left radicals who have an unlimited amount of power to dole out goodies to their friends and to forge a very frightening jen d.a. glenn: let me do one more thing. john holdren, science czar. we have already heard sterilizing the drinking water and he wrote "it would be entirely logical to cap the gross national product. it is by now abundantly clear that the g.o.p. cannot grow forever. why should it?" that'sthat's right. i want to see a litmus test of every democrat lawmaker out there and liberals on t.v. and ask do you agree with this radical science czar we should be doing these things? and i would like to see the

public contact the office of technology and then maybe they will respond to the public. glenn: we will inform you on all of the czars in the coming days an coming weeks, the key to this machine or whatever it is they are building is the czars. these guys are wildly outside of the constitution if they wield any power, and believe me, they do. back in a minute. 20 years ago. i was a home health nurse. i saw people every day that couldn't get around anymore. they wanted to stay independent, but canes, walkers and manual wheelchairs were no longer safe for them to use. to stay in their homes they needed a power chair, but most chairs couldn't get around the tight spaces in their homes. that's why i invented the hoveround. see how it's round? it gets around those tight places like no other power chair. no problems. with the hoveround and with the way the front end is, i back right in, and then i just turn the chair

to the right and i'm right there in front. i've never had a problem yet. and it's still the only round power chair you can get. hoveround's process? it's easy. most people think that getting a chair like this would be complicated. not at hoveround. we handle all the paperwork to keep it simple. our medical director is a board-certified orthopedic surgeon, and he insists on it. as hoveround's medical director, i make sure we handle all of the paperwork efficiently to make things easy for you and your doctor. that's why over 100,000 physicians have already prescribed hoverounds for their patients. and with medicare and supplemental insurance, most of those patients paid little or nothing to get their hoveround. zero! i paid nothing for the unit at all. it choked me up at the time that it happened and i was really very happy. since medicare let's you choose your brand of power chair, why not get the one that really is better all around? we built the hoveround on what i call 'the model of total responsibility'. we're the only company that makes your chair,

delivers your chair, and provides in-home service for as long as you own your chair. if you want the only round power chair, call hoveround today. you can't get a hoveround anywhere else. call hoveround today. get a free dvd kit that can change your life. we're better all around. go to hoveround.com or call the number on your screen today.

"special report." now back to glenn. >> glenn: hello, america! this time we have been doing the hot list, but we decided to completely change it up or just rename it to "use your he head," bringing you stories where people in washington just aren't using their head. we begin in california. surprise, surprise! you might not believe this story. it's even too crazy for california, but here we go. they're trying to close their $26 billion short shortfall. they voted on the latest budget deal which included a proposal which would allow oil drilling off the coast of santa barbara. why would you do that? the measure passed the state senate, and then moved to the assembly. on july 24th, it was killed by a vote of 43-28, but then something very strange happened. the assembly voted to expunge

the record -- or the vote from the record. they erased who voted and how they voted, from the public record. apparently, because they didn't want anyone to know. as assemblyman chuck devour who sponsored the proposal said "certainly george orwell would be proud." as devour pointed out, the whole thing was carried live on cal channel, which is an even more boring state version of c-span. the video was not posted on cal channel. we called to see where it is. they said, well, it takes about a week. we said, can you put it up faster than that? well, it's a state-run arm. we'll try. we haven't seen it yet. but it is coming, or at least they tell us. i will tell you that we have something else they don't want you to see. assembly man devour got a copy of that vote before they deleted the record. he sent it to me.

i posted the list of the names and people in california, you know, that didn't absolutely what vote, no. it's at glennbeck.com. remember, last week's famous beer summit with president obama and the police officer and that good professor friend of his? oh, i have a picture that's worth a billion words. here it is. look at that. you see this picture? it was actually posted on the white house blog. this is a white house photo, walking to the rose garden, president obama out in front, shoulders squared, look at me, i'm taking charge! meanwhile, his good friend, professor gates, walking with a cane, i can barely get down the steps. good thing. police sergeant police sergeant james crowley was there helping the president's friend. you may have heard rumors about sarah palin, the former alaska governor, reported in the news over the weekend. when will these people leave

this family alone? today on salon.com, there is an article comparing sarah palin to mahmoud ahmadinejad. get used to it. sarah palin is the former governor of alaska. she is a target for the media because the media, and both parties need to destroy her. i will tell you this again and again and again -- i really firmly believe the paradigm in this country is about to change. i think if she is who she says she is, she is going to be part of that change, so, keeping in mind, i mean, they said almost everything about her, what else could they possibly say? oh, i've got it! in a new future news report! this just in from the future. we have learned today in the mainstream media breaking news that sarah palin is, in fact, the devil, also known as satan, lucifer. palin, the >> powerful evil and tempter

of mankind had this to say -- "there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. we will be punished for the everlasting presence of the destruction of the lord and some will be cast into outer darkness. 0th hers should have their partedden burdened forever by fire and brimstone. then out of the pit the great smoke of the great furnace and the sun and the air were darkened by a reason of smoke in the pit. in related news, palin's husband todd is, in fact, now the media has learned, a flesh-eating zombie hybrid. at least he's a hybrid. he roams the backcountry of alaska, drinks the blood of innocent children, pausing only to club baby seals to death and shoot bears from helicopters. he also stops from time to time to update twitter and doubt man made global warming.

by the way, he does all of these things on a gas guzzling snow machine. true or false, america? use your head! that's your report. >> have you heard about the huge rally in columbus, ohio this weekend? no? that's because the media isn't talking about it,t,t,t,t,t,t,t,

let me tell you about... a very important phone call i made. when i got my medicare card... i realized i needed... an aarp medicare supplement insurance card too. one simple call... gave me the chance to talk... with a personal health insurance advisor... who answered all my questions... about medicare supplement plans. so i could understand it all... after i called... i was able to choose the plan that was right for me. if you're already on or eligible for medicare... call now to find out how... an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan... insured by united healthcare insurance company... helps you pay some of the 20% of your medical expenses... not covered by medicare part b. that can save you from paying... thousands of dollars out of your own pocket. these are the only medicare supplement insurance plans... exclusively endorsed by aarp... a name you trust. when you call now... we'll send you this free information kit... with all you need to enroll. so you can join the millions of people...

who've already trusted us... for their medicare supplement insurance. plus we'll send you this free guide to understanding medicare. the prices are competitive. i can keep my own doctor and choose my own hospital. and i don't need a referral to see a specialist. call now to get the free information kit. plus we'll include this free medicare guide. and the advantages don't end there. you can choose from a wide range of plans... that are all competitively priced... so you can find a plan that best fits your needs and budget. there are virtually no claim forms to fill out. and best of all... they're the only medicare supplement plans... endorsed by aarp. when they told me these plans were endorsed by aarp... i had only one thing to say... sign me up. call now -- 1-800-232-7773/tty and let us help you choose the right plan. so call now, 1-800-232-7773/tty and find out about... an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan. a personal health insurance advisor is waiting for your call

finally, good news for people with type 2 diabetes or at risk for diabetes. introducing new nutrisystem d, the clinically tested program for losing weight and reducing blood sugar. hi i'm mike, and i lost 100 pounds on nutrisystem d when i was first diagnosed with diabetes, that first step was more like a giant leap. till i discovered nutrisystem d. in a clinical study people on nutrisystem d lost 16 times more weight and reduced their blood sugar 5 times more than those on a hospital-directed plan. plus a1c was reduced .9%. choose from over 140 menu options, there is no counting carbs, calories or points. i lost 100 lbs. and lowered my blood sugar level. nutrisystem d changed my life. mike is one of many who have lost weight and controlled their diabetes with new nutrisystem d. backed by 35 years of research and low glycemic index science nutrisystem d works. satisfaction guaranteed or your money back! new! nutrisystem d.

lose weight. live better. call or click today. glenn: while obama is making rounds to sweeten his healthcare plan, we want to show you how people are really feeling in this country. take a listen to some recent town hall meetings. >> we have a bill and we have a bill that is 1,000 pages, and we have to sign it fast. >> we have to make quick judgments, very fast. >> why is it on the table? why is it even on the table?

glenn: this guy is a liberal, apparently. >> non-py pelosi, harry -- nancy pelosi, harry reid, and the rest of the people in the congress and the senate, are they going to be willing to be on the same plan they're asking us to be on? >> in ten years, it will create a $10 billion surplus. >> ha ha ha ha ha! >> in your face! >> there has never been a government program that had a surplus! >> something to say to your constituents, sir? >> stop spending our money! no cap and trade! no to cap and trade! glenn: this is amazing. in my lifetime, i have never

seen anything like this. i know the left has dismissed a lot of these people because they don't understand actual grassroots. it's all community organized for them, but a lot of these people are people that have just never done this kind of stuff before in their life. bringing back now senior judicial analyst, and author of "dread scott's revenge" judge andrew napolitano. huh a wild experience this weekend, but i have talked to people, listeners, who told me they went to some of these town hall meetings and some of these people are not allowed to ask questions. i mean, they're just being lectured to. this is not a good scene. >> no, this is not a good scene. i think it is the tip of the iceberg. before i was here, i was on the bench in new jersey, and unless you're intimately involved in the government, i have never seen anything like this. i have never seen the size of the crowds that we're going to talk about later, which is very positive, and i have never seen the depth of the anger in these crowds towards

well-established public figures. that first tape you showed was arlen specter, democrat/republican/democrat. he has been a senator for 30 years. >> another guy was saying why is the single payer option off the table. that is obviously a progressive. >> correct. glenn: i warned when obama was running, i said this guy is painting himself as the messiah. the media is helping. he is making all these promises. if he doesn't do all these things while promising, hey, it is a new era, i'm a different kind of politician, they're going to be outraged at this guy. >> i think mrs. pelosi might have as much problems with the hard left among is summary democrats in the house as she does with the so-called blue dogs. i don't know that there is any common ground between them. glenn: how do you piece this back together, judge? i am so concerned that this are ran arckists and crazy people on the left and the

right, and you keep disenfranchising people, and then have the media ignore their voices, and then have the politicians go out and meet with them, and they say you can't even ask questions. we're not taking questions. sit down and be quiet and i will tell you the way it is. god forbid, it will destroy the republic. we will tear each other apart. >> well, you are doing a great service by exposing this. you put the liberal fellow on there saying why is single payer off the table? i want single payer. this guy wants medicare for everybody. we don't want it. the constitution doesn't allow it, but you're giving him a voice that his own member of congress didn't want to give him. glenn: it's unbelievable. i want to show you pictures that the national news media won't showowowowowow yowoweel

glenn: we are back with seep yore judicial analyst judge andrew napolitano. the judge is here. you were actually out of town this weekend. i want to show you pictures, america. this is what the press reported as a couple hundred people showing up for a rally. do we have the video? that could just be two. there it is. there is a couple hundred people for a tea party. the police are saying that it was 8,000 to 10,000 people, but i didn't see this anywhere, anywhere on the news. you with there. you spoke. >> one of my producers said that there was an article in an ohio paper saying judge napolitano from fox news spoke to 300 people. now, the police themselves told me 8,000 to 10,000. i saw the crowd. it was enormous. it was enthusiastic. it was happy. it was concerned about freedom. glenn, i talked to them as i might talk to law students about where do our freedoms

come from? do they come from god or the government? they were lisping to every word, and they understood the experience of it. glenn: i have never seen america like i am seeing it now. these are not flag wavers. these are people who may have been flag wavers in the past and just have kind of a faithless tradition in america, but now have done their homework, and are hungry for the truth and hungry for the truth about the founding fathers that is never taught in school. >> what is interesting, and you mentioned it earlier on in the show, they understand this is not a republican versus democratic issue. they understand there is a republican version of big government, which is dangerous to us, and a democratic version which is dangerous to our freedoms. somewhere, we all have to be pro freedom. we're entitled to a government that stays within the confines of the constitution, who matter who is at head of the government. glenn: i'm afraid that not

enough people in washington listen to these people, take them seriously. the media dismisses them. they are growing in numbers. they are growing in numbers. on just a saturday, 10,000 people will show up in columbus, ohio. >> 95 degrees heat and 95% humidity. somebody was making a fortune selling bottled water. they stood in this weather, including an downpour for an hour and a half before i got on. wildly enthusiastic, very big fans of the glenn beck show, i have to tell you. i must have signed over 150 copies of "common sense," the glenn beck "common sense." glenn: that's very flattering. i have to tell you, judge, i'm glad that you were there, because you understand the constitution, and america needs a good lesson in it again. they're hungry for t >> thank you for having me on to chat about it. glenn: now what can you do and what can you do

glenn: the best thing that you can do right now is let congress know that you are watching them like a hawk. you show up. you let them feel your burning gaze on them at all times, but here is the thing that i am concerned about. your interaction with them needs to be respectful, polite, forceful and peaceful. i have been warning congress now for a couple of years and the time has come and passed for them to be able to learn

from this. i have been telling them you have to listen to the people, or they will be in real big trouble. well, now let me give the warning to you. if anyone thinks that it would be a good idea to turn violent, think again t would destroy the republic. i feel it with everything in me. there is a great reason for hope right now, because i am telling you for the first time, and i started saying this in the last couple of years, for the first time i know it. i feel t the american people are starting to wake up. these people in washington have no idea what they have done. they have awakened a sleeping giant, but just one lunatic, like timothy mcveigh could ruin everything that everyone has worked so hard for, because these people in washington won't pass up the use of an emergency. look how the media ran with the abortion doctor killing. they tried to pin that act on fox in general and specifically bill o'reilly and me! the only thing either of us have ever said is that there's

no reason for that, ever. i don't want to ever hear from our own americans, anyone, voicing some sort of muslim extremist-type justification as we heard in the circles after 9/11. well, i could see how they felt they had to do it, of course i don't agree. absolutely not. there is no excuse for violence. our founders sailed across the ocean, battled killer storms, smallpox. they vomited for three months on a tiny little wooden ship with a bed sheet for a sail just to get a grievance before the king. they did that for 20 long years. what have we done? oh, i sent an e-mail. they made a phone call. they won't listen to me anymore. so the next logical progression is e-mail and a letter to a gun? only for a crazy person. if you hear someone talking about turning violent, it is your patriotic duty to stop them.

from this one watchdog on this