good night from washington. go to greta wire.com. put in an open thread to talk about gloria tonight. >> glenn: welcome to the "glenn beck program." i want to start with some economy headlines today. by the bottom of the hour, you will know why they are more critical than what they seem. america, tonight is a show you want to drv and share with friends. you don't want to miss a second of today's episode, especially the ending. here are some of the headlines -- why the stock rally can't last if the dollar keeps burning. american students are flunking science and it's forcing employers to look abroad. here is what tea party isolationism will do to the economy. how the high-speed yan could force china to a crash. for the first time in 70 years new yorker lost income in 2009. fitch just downgraded ireland

and set the outlook to negative. trade war to go def-con four as u.s. pushes for imf involvement for dispute with china. sobering look at the structure of the u.s. treasury debt. all of these stories, this is one day. this is this morning behind my desk i'm reading the business insider. you just look at that chart and the business insider, you understand that chart and you will understand what we're up against. we need a solution. what is the solution? to devalue our currency. if you thought that $5 a gallon gasoline would have been bad a couple of summers ago, here is another headline. "main street will figure out policy of inflation when gas hits $5 a gallon." why? why would it hit $5 a gallon again? progressives are doing what they always do. they try to equal everything out. they're running up debt. the best way to pay off the

debt is their latest idea. to simply value all the world's currencies equally. one world currency. but by a different name, so nobody freaks out. bernanke said he would never monotize the debt. we showed his testimony to congress under oath. then months later we showed you how they were doing that through a third party. now they're announcing and saying inflation is their strategy to get out of debt. that is bad for the chinese but i think it's much, much worse for you. because we are lambs being led to the slaughter. now what would be the motivation of anyone doing that? who in their right mind would want all of this? well, that's a great question. it's not a secret. it's a different mindset. the wolf is now shedding its sheep's clothing. tonight i will show you the monsters who will tell you with a straight face and mean it they're not monsters, they're only doing what is best. the monsters behind the

progressive mask and the nightmare ideas that are coming. from them. c'mon! ♪ ♪ >> glenn: hello, america. i want to talk to you tonight and again i want to lead with this. do not ever, please ever take my word for anything. you do your own homework. you look it up. i wouldn't have believed these things three years ago. when i found them three years ago i thought this book must be crazy or this historian is nuts. no. it is all there. just nobody ever pieces it altogether because the progressives control can our history in our schools. but all the documentation in their own handwriting, in their own words, you will see some of it tonight. it's all there.

in the next hour you'll hear horrifying concepts and beliefs, so incomprehensible to the average american, so graphic and so far below the lowest standards of humanity you might think i'm reading from a steven king novel. but these are real people expressing their real beliefs and they are not monsters. they're not evil. it's what they believe. and they really truly believe they are being compassionate and doing the right thing. tomorrow i'm explain a little more about that. because we have to get to the mindset. today we're going to find out what do they say and how do they get here? i warn you, some of the clips you are going to see tonight are graphic and disturbing. i want to start with a clip we showed you a couple nights ago. journalist, column and author virginia ironside on the bbc

last sunday and made this stunning declaration on the bbc. >> if i were a mother of a suffering child, i would be the first to want -- i mean a deeply suffering child, i would be the first to want to put a pillow over its face, as i would with any suffering thing. i think the difference is that my feeling of horror, suffering is much greater than my feeling of getting rid of a couple of cells. suffering can go on for years. >> i'm sorry. that is a pretty horrifying thing. >> what? >> to say. that you would put pillow over -- >> of course i would, if i was a child i really love who had is in agony. i think any good mother would. >> glenn: this is horrifying on so many levels, the way she casually describes suffocating an infant as something any loving mother would do. she is not a monster. she is not evil. she is doing what any loving mother would do.

of course she would. of course she would smother her child. also the way he refers to a baby as a couple of cells. perhaps the most shocking at all is the fact she doesn't realize that what she is saying is that controversial. i am a father of a child with special needs. my daughter has taught me more about life and god i think than any other one person. she has done it without ever trying to. she has taught me more about myself. taught me more about compassion. my daughter is, she has cerebral palsy. if you met her and you most likely wouldn't know. she's brilliant. but it's been a struggle.

and i can't can imagine a world without her. i'm convinced when i see people that have been labelled "retarded" by our society that when all is said and done, and we get to the other side we'll find out who the "retarded" ones are. it will be us. our priorities are wrong. i don't think god will put a pillow over our face and smother us. we'll learn. all right. so here is a mother saying that of course all good loving mothers would smother their children. if they were in pain, it's out of compassion. now, let me switch gears slightly. this is another clip from england. we'll get to america in a second. but this one is from the environmentalists who believe that if we don't act within four years, there is no reversing climate change. so they want to warn you. well, they are already trying to warn you about this. but now they need to kick it up a notch. because a nudge isn't enough.

now maybe a slap across the face. what you are about to see is very graphic. >> we're thinking of using our car less. i'm going to cycle to school. >> fantastic! >> no pressure, but it would be a great to get a sense of how many of you might do this. a rough percentage. that's fantastic! who isn't? phillip and tracy. that's fine. your own choice. okay, class. thank you so much for today. i will see you all tomorrow. oh, just before you go, i just need to press this little button here. now everybody please remember to read chapters five and six on volcanoes and galciations. >> glenn: okay. so remember, they believe in saul alinsky, the ends justify the means.

that thought it was okay. nobody thought it would be a bad idea until it hit the air and when people freaked out first they said it was a joke. it's not a joke. they have now come out and said look, there is only four years left to act. we had to wake people up. okay. what if there is only up with year left to act or a month or ten days or we're a year behind? what do we do? if you literally believe the world is doomed unless we act, and you devalued human kind, what is drastic to you? the environmentalists devoured careers. they want to ban people from getting meteorologist license unless you agree with them. anybody speaking against them they're deniers, they're destroyers and they're

discredited. you know, you're a holocaust denier. when those nudges don't work, what is next? hey, i know. how about if they send skeptics to court? could you do that? how about in prison, people who deny global warming? would you execute them? i know you wouldn't do it with a little button. you couldn't. but this sounds implazable, doesn't it? it sounds ridiculous. let me show you something from theblaze.com. here is a story that is on there today. they have begun gathering a list of ridiculous and implausible ideas that have been said by environmentalists recently. remember, the ends justify the means. they're saving the planet. in june of last year, liberal blog site tpm posted an article and quickly had to take it down when people started to protest that read, "at what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers? in 2006, the ecomagazine called for burmburg trials for skeptics."

in 2008, guardian reported that nasa james hanson called for the trial of climate skeptic for high crime against humanity. that is a nasa official. in 2008, canadian environmentalists david suzuki called for government leaders skeptical of global warming to be thrown into jail. in 2007, robert f. kennedy junior said of skeptics this is treason. we need to start treating them as traitors. there's more. including the environmentalist that said soon another generation will come and strangle you in your beds. find it theblaze.com. trial, prison, treason, execution. then we have a joke on tv that basically shows that. then another person talking about smothering their own baby, or a couple of cells, with a pillow but it's the loving and right thing to do. these are not lone isolated

incidents of raving lunatics. i'll show you in a few minutes an ad running in new york that will boggle your mind. it would be horrible if these twisted ideas came from the mind of raving lunatics. but they're not. they're very rational people. who just believe in things that are different than you. where did the ideas come from? you can find them from the same place. progressivism in america, marxist overseas and fabian socialist in australia, new zealand, england and europe. they are all the same thing. they are all the same stock of people. i talk to you a lot about progressives and marxist, but fabian socialists, look them up. you will be astounded what you find. it's the same pool of people. fabian socialists was a society founded in january of

1884. the members sought to influence public opinion on socialism. what made them unique at the time if you wanted to be a socialism, you needed a mass revolution. they preferred selective education. selective education. under the woodrow wilson administration, education of the powerful few, especially those in government and the media. who could lead reforms in government. it is why our media is so screwed up. and they all think alike. the strategy is called doctrine of inevitability of gradualism. what does that mean? the doctrine of inevitability of gradualism. let's say you say to your wife hey, i want to rebuild an engine in the living room. she's not going to do that. she's going to say what is

wrong with you? if you believe that's what needs to be done, you want to be able to watch football games while rebuilding your engine of your car and you want to do it in your commy la-z-boy, what do you do? you can do one thing. you can drag the engine in the center of the living room and then she goes nuts or bring a sparkplug and leave it on the table. until she stops noticing it. bring in another one. then another part. carburetor. pretty soon you have the whole damn engine sitting in there. she will tell you at first, can you stop? can you stop -- can you take these away? you leave them there. she'll forget eventually and she won't notice that you have all of the parts in the engine that you are going to build there in the living room. it becomes inevitable. you can say it's already here. the doctrine of inevitability of gradualism. okay. now why the name "fabian"? the fabian society.

this is after general fabias maximus. he had a brilliant strategy. he advanced in his battles not through front-on battles but instead through harassment and attrition. in other words he wore everybody out. almost like overwhelm your opponents, overwhelm the system. he would constantly wear them out. hit them, hit them, hit them. little ones, hit them, hit them, hit them. until timely they were worn out from the harassment. then it became inevitable. gosh, is it becoming inevitable we just can't get out of this debt bubble? a little step at a time. fabian socialist, one of the early members was george bernard shaw. this is a man who is highly regarded still to this day. this is a guy who won a nobel peace prize, he won an oscar, the bbc described him this

way::clausic playwright, journalist. a sind scintillating public speaker. arts reviewer. campaign socialist. this is what everybody adores from shaw. this. watch. >> say sir or madam. be kind enough to justify your existence. if you can't justify your existence, if you're not pulling your weight, if you're not producing as much as you consume, or more, then clearly we cannot use the deorganization of the society. or keeping you alive because your life does not benefit us. and it can be of use to you either. >> glenn: it's not useful to you or the society. it's horrifying stuff. yet i guarantee you, your son or daughter has never heard a bad thing about this man. critically acclaimed by the

establishment. it may be tough for them to swallow but he is a monster. no one talks about the genius of hitler's good ideas like the volkswagen. the good ideas don't balance out the bad ones. the man was a monster. shaw was a famous playwright. but he was also a strong believer in eugenics. it was george bernard shaw, ask yourself if you ever learn this, ask your kids if they learned this. who dreamt up the gas chambers, the death chambers? who did? george benard shaw dreamt them up to get rid of the undesirables. "a part of eugenic politics would finally land us in an extensive use of the lethal chamber. a great many people will have to be put out of existence, simply because it wastes other people's time to look after them." i don't care that he wrote witty little plays. the man was a monster. all of this stems from the same place. fabian socialists.

marxists. and what was it that hillary clinton called herself during the campaign when she was embarrassed to answer if she was a liberal? he said this. >> i prefer the word "progressive" which has a real american meaning going back to the progressive era at the beginning of the 20th century. >> glenn: "the beginning of the 20th century." at the end of the 19th century, and it came roaring in to america, the beginning of the 20th century. they believe in what is good for the cleck i have. secular humanists. god at best is something to hang on to just in case. they are the people that you must have evolution. you must have evolution. if you can take god out of the picture and have evolution, this is the way to do it. when you think the way they do, you dehumanize situations. suddenly you're convinced

it's okay to save one or two to end suffering for thousands or one. he's how shaw, sanger and now the global warming nuts all end in the same place where they are saying so, we have to eliminate a few people, throw them in prison because they disagree. those in pain. those in who are inferior. i guess now those who are skeptics. they have convinced themselves that the world will be destroyed unless they step in to save the day. it is the ultimate god complex. gee, who did we say on last night's show had a god complex? that's right. george soros. it is a sort of a disease, when you consider yourself some kind of god, creator of everything. but i feel comfortable about it now since i began to live it out. there are only two possible ways a society ends. if you believe in god you believe in redemption, you believe the messiah comes and there is a redemption and it's a beautiful ending.

if you have a god complex, well you know that it's going to end in chaos. there is always something that is going to destroy the world. first world war, then nuclear war, then nuclear winter, then global cooling, overpopulation and now it's global warming. chaos. chaos. is the only end. if you don't believe in god chaos is how it always will be. somebody, the smart, the fit, those who understand will step in and stop it. this is where we're headed. i will show you where it goes next and how it travels from england to here and how much has already been accomplished and why you must vote coming up.

now everybody please remember to read chapters five and six on volcanos and glaciacians. >> if i were a mother of a

suffering child, i would be the first to want i mean, a deeply suffering child, i would be the first to put a pillow over its face, as i would with any suffering thing. i think the difference is -- >> glenn: "with any suffering thing." i want to show you an ad that's now running in new york for climate change. warning, shocking. pull it full screen, please. >> where do you get these ideas? that you're the fear mongering. can you imagine opening up a magazine and seeing that with your child? when you get these ideas from the minds of monsters, progressives, the early 20th century and the fabian socialists. fabian socialism is what we're talking about. the mentality spread to america and it's here.

the president's new head of medicare and medicaid, done -- don berwick, why would you have to do that? we told you under obama-care there would be inevitably rationing. the president said no. every newspaper around, every journalist said it was crazy talk. according to berwick himself, it's not what we'll ration care but whether we'll ration with our eyes open. so who picks who lives or dies? hopefully somebody as compassionate as the mother on the bbc. here is why the stories from england matter. we will be there soon. berwick stated he is in love with england's healthcare system. they got their system from fabian socialists who founded the london school of economics. they are the main think tank behind the labor party. they've got people drinking water from plants and having babies in corridors.

a 22-year-old man died of thirst after begging for water and being completely neglected. say what you will about the problems with the systems here but nobody ever died of thirst at one of our hospitals. but has anybody ever died in closet of a hospital in america and put compassionately in the closet so you couldn't hear the child's screams as it died? yes. yes. here in america. a baby that didn't die from an abortion was left in a u.s. hospital in illinois. left in a laundry room so no one would hear. there was a law voted on to prevent this thing from ever happening again. guess who didn't vote for it? guess who showed up only to

vote present? illinois state senator barack obama. why? the response to the u.k. hospital death is the nurses have to sign a public pledge they'll treat everyone with compassion and dignity. yes, but i've heard compassion already today from someone. >> if i were a her of a suffering child, i would be the first to want -- i mean a deeply suffering child i would be the first one to put a pillow over its face as i would with any suffering thing. i think the difference is -- >> glenn: okay. here is a mother saying it's compassionate to smother. what is the difference? it's what happens when you are under the influence of fabian socialist or a progressive model. human life is devalued. just as the dollar is being devalued and they are connected, because the only reason you would have to ration something like medical care is when there is a shortage of supply, of

doctors, or of money. suddenly who has to decide if they live or die. you will have to decide. i'd feel better if we had to decide ourselves but it's not. it will be in the happened of a government official, a progressive or fabian socialist like it is in england. it's a cold calculation based op the greater good of society. it's called -- look it up, please. don't take any of this myself. look this up. zeke emanuel, white house. the "complete lives system." how george benard shaw can propose lethal chambers. it's how this woman can advocate smothering children with pillows an how environmentists can justify executing skeptics. it's how obama's science czar john holdren who believed in the wildly discredited idea of the population explosion can propose putting

sterilents in drinking water and force sterilization and planetary regime; ie, global government to monitor global population size. it's for the greater good you see. it's compassionate, not evil. they believe in these things. i want to show you a picture of tony blair. this is tony blair. he is standing in front of a window, stained glass window. this isn't about tony blair. it's about blair commemorating the 150-year birthday of george bernard shaw. the window he is standing next to -- do we have a cleaner copy or not? the window, this is the fabian socialist window, commissioned by shaw for the fabian socialists. what is going on in the window? they are fanning the flames with the bellows and they are

reshaping the world. they're helping to build a new world. how are they doing that? with hammers. this one is shaw. along with the other founding members -- that's members h.g. wells on the bottom left doing this. a man who had an affair with none other than margaret sanger and predicted when the history of the civilization is written it will be a biological history and margaret sanger will be one of the heroines. how are they building it? with hammers. with hammers. now it's the power of persuasion. here we are. power of persuasion. right? how is it -- what was it that andy stern said again? i'm trying to remember. >> we're trying to use the power of persuasion. if that doesn't work we'll use persuasion of power. there are governments and there opportunities to change laws that affect the companies. i'm not naive.

we're ready to strike? "the persuasion of power." when we come back, a little more on this and then i'm going to tie it all together and show you what is happening here. next.

the 2012 election? "special report" begins at 6:00 eastern. now back to glenn beck. ♪ ♪ >> glenn: america, the reason you've not heard about the things we're talking about tonight, fabian socialism and

the idea of the early 20th century progressive movement is it's very hard to explain, it's very complex. and they make you into a lunatic if you talk about it. that's why i ask you. don't believe anything that i say. please don't. don't take it as gospel. look this all up yourself. you will be -- i believe everybody on my staff as they do research themselves and i say go get this, go get this, go get this. i think they began not believing me. now i think i just talked to somebody in the control room. they said i think it's very clear, glenn, but horrifying. it is. especially when you see the pieces come together. we're trying to do it tonight but we're running out of time. fabian socialism started in england and spread here. it has been here for a very long time. it's the same stock but a different name of the progressive movement. they are using the persuasion of power. let me show you the fabian

shield again. this is the shield, this is their code of arms. can you tell me what that is? that is a wolf in sheep's clothing. now, why would you have that as your logo? there is another logo of the fabian socialists. it is this. the turtle. the words underneath "when i strike, i strike hard." the turtle isn't exactly used as a common animal for imagery. why the turtle? because it's slow, steady. they make progress. when they strike, it is the doctrine of inevitability of gradualism. he is gradually coming but when he is ready, he strikes and he strikes hard. they are about to strike globally. i want to show you something that hit me this weekend when i heard about the elections in brazil. look at the globe and the elections and who is in charge. first, we go to the u.k. it all started there.

fabian society. did you know since 1997 there have been around 200 fabian m.p.s in the commons including nearly the entire cabinet, including tony blair. australia, the new prime minister is in the progressive australian party. was formally in the socialist forum. she's denied she is a communist. she told the press, and, of course, they didn't follow up on this that she was just a secretary for the communists. licking envelopes. brazil, lula, worker's party, first elected in 2003. he picked his successor and suspected winner is this woman. she's great. don't worry about her. she was only a former marxist guerrilla imprisoned in the 1970s in brazil. venezuela, we know about hugo chavez. united socialist party of venezuela. bolivia, movement toward socialism, first elected in 2005. re-elected in 2009. reportedly eyeing a third

term. nicaragua, national liberation front. that is their socialist party. greec greece,socialist movement. austria, socialist party. like the people marming this past weekend at the mall. slovenia, prime minister, social democrat. the united states, barack obama. a progressive. there is no star chamber here, gang. there is nothing. there's nothing. it's all out in the open and you can find all of this information. yet, they are a wolf in sheep's clothing. they are starting to reveal their fangs. what i showed you from george bernard shaw, the ecomonsters, the baby smothering lady. again, let me show you the ecomonster advertisement from here in new york. all of this might sound evil

to you. i don't know how else to put it. i mean, it's not wrong. but this is evil. it is evil. how much more do your neighbors need before they start to wake up and start reading, stop name-calling and just look at the facts? let me go back to this, rules for radicals. do you remember the dedication in the book "rules to radicals?" it's this. "to on the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did so, so effectively he at least won his own kingdom. lucifer." a book featured and highlighted on the nea recommended reading list. saul alinsky, "simple formula for success. aggravate, agitate, educate and organize." one of the famous slogans for the fabian society was educate, agitate and organize.

may i ask, are you beginning to see why i said the 40-day and 40-night challenge is important? i believe we are facing evil. not that these people are evil, but why else would these people be a wolf in sheep's clothing? my, my, grandma, what big teeth you have. the response was yes, the better to eat you with, my dear. it started the top of the hour with problems, lots of problems. all of these problems that were on on the website today, just economic problems. but don't you understand all these problems, all these problems are leading us to ask the kind sheep for the solution. the sheep are providing the solution. they are not sheep. we are. they are the wolf. when you put all of this context, you see how it's all coming together. again, not in some conspiracy

at all. you start to understand a few things. again, like this quote from barack obama that was in "rolling stone" magazine. he said, "it's a point of view that i think is ultimately destructive for the long-term growth of the country that has a vibrant middle class and is competitive in the world. what is destructive? fox. well, yes, mr. president. you ire damn right. you're damn right. we are dangerous to this kind of ideology. we are shepards. we'll protect the flocks as long as we can. flocks, time to wake up. back in a minute.

>> glenn: i fear i'm going to run out of time tonight but we'll pick this up tomorrow. this is a show you need to watch and research on your own, please. tonight you heard about fabian socialism, some famous fabian socialist. why are we bringing this up? what relevance does it have to you today? to answer that, introduce you to the gentleman, you should have known him but no one heard of him. stuart chase. chase was a member of the boston fabian club. and he wrote a little book here called "the road we are traveling." i would tell you to read this book but this book we had to

have overnighted. we found in a library in arkansas. this was the only one we could find of it. in this book, he outlined more than a dozen things he observed that were happening that would result in replacing the free enterprise system. he said the free enterprise system would be replaced by something he envisioned just called "x." because the structure was still being molded. the name he threw around were socialism, state capitalism, which is exactly what the world is headed for. that's what the globalist call it. china, state capitalism. and fashionism. however, he these terms would only lead to confusion so he only called it "x." here are the things he saw. he said the first one is a strong centralized government. now do we have strong centralized government? executive arm growing at the expense of legislative arms? how many elected czars are there in the administration? the number three thing on the

list was control of credit banking and security exchanges by the government. they allow stakovers, massive new financial regulation. another characteristic was the underwriting of employment through government through armament or public work. how about the temporary jobs for 225,000 census workers. number five, underwriting of social security of the government, the old age mother pension, unemployment insurance and the like. social security, check. pensions for unions. unemployment insurance, done. if you look at the list, is there anything on the list we haven't accomplished? anything? that is just the first baker's dozen. give you a few more. then why, why would we go to all the trouble to find this book? when the war ends. why would we go to all this trouble? who cares? why is it important? we'll tell you next.

>> glenn: we have shown you interesting fabian socialist observations, things that would lead to ereplacing the free market, that have been achieved here in america.

done by a boston fabian socialist member stuart chase. here he is. this is the fabian society wolf in sheep's clothing. i think you would be on the wrong side -- i mean, anyway, he put it all in a book called "the road we are traveling." we had a hard time finding the book. this is the only copy we could find and we found in a library in arkansas. we are definitely traveling down this road. this is what he said. strong centralized government, growing executive arm, control of the banking system, underwriting of employment by the government, underwriting of social security, underwriting of food, housing, medicare care and use of deficit spending. the abandonment of gold. government control of foreign trade. control of natural resources. control of the energy sources. control of transportation and agricultural production. have you heard the new thing about farmers and dust? if your dust blows to somebody else's -- they can fine you on that. anyway, enlistment of the youth corps. that's a fascinating one. i think i heard that recently.

heavy taxation and state control of communications. got it? now why does it matter? why am i bringing up this dusty book? this author, stuart chase. he observed capitalism replaced slowly but surely. he wrote about this in 1932. he wrote about all of this and he said this is what is coming. do you know why? because he was the guy who wrote a book titled "a new deal." sound familiar? yeah. that new deal. f.d.r. made the new deal a part of his speech when he accepted the democratic presidential nomination the same year. he was part of f.d.r.'s kitchen cabinet. in 193, the president told chase's father his son was teaching the american people more about economics than any of the others combined. sadly, you may not know about stuart chase, the man who saw the future, the man who

designed the new deal. a fabian society member. sadly he is teaching us all a lesson that continues to this day.

>> glenn: you don't want to miss tomorrow's show. we continue this tomorrow with clarifications. spend a little more time. we covered a lot of ground.