>> demand it! >> dana: hello, i'm dana perino with kimberly guilfoyle, bob beckel, eric bolling, and greg gutfeld. it's 5:00 in new york city. this is "the five." ♪ ♪ >> dana: we don't often have guests on the program but boy do we have a special person joining us today. we'd like to welcome the former first lady barbara bush, joining us by phone from houston, texas. back with first lady's conference she attended with her daughter-in-law, laura bush and her son, george bush. you have been busy on all sort of front. volunteerism and attending the conference today. you also had time to talk about why you think mitt romney should be the g.o.p. nominee. can you tell us a little bit about your relationship with the romneys? >> well, we have known the romneys for a number of years, dana.

i knew the mother and father. i'm so old now i probably knew the grandmother and grandfather. but in any case, we loved them. george romney started inspiration for points of light. he is a wonderful giving man and his son is the name. we really enjoyed them. i love ann romney. her great courage. she is just, i think they are a great family. i honestly think he is the -- i haven't endorsed anyone yet, obvious, but do you think i have endorsed obviously. but he is just a businessman who will cope with the problems we have and get jobs. business back to where it should be. he is a very wise man. he has done wonderful things. i'm sick of people tearing him down, because he is a great, i think, a great man and would be a great choice.

>> dana: let me ask you one more question before i turn it over to my friends here. >> sharing me with your friends, but okay. okay. >> dana: it's just bob beckel. don't worry. you have been through a lot of campaigns. well, so many campaigns, congressional seats, senate races, presidential races. >> lost a lot. >> dana: you lost some and you won some. have you always loved campaigning? >> no. not at all. but i'm worried about this campaign. too ugly. i don't like it. it's too bad and i'm very much for mitt romneysh a mitt romney. i'm endorsing him for george. there i go again. >> dana: are you worried about the infighting? the g.o.p. infighting? >> yes. i don't like it at all. i don't like the fact frankly the congress doesn't

compromise on things and get together. i'm worried about the fact -- so, too, of the president. i don't think he works with the congress well. it's a blame game instead of let's get together and get something going. i think mitt romney could do that. i really do. i think he could make something happen. >> dana: bob beckel has a question for you. >> thank you for being here. the question pressing on my mind for years now. does your husband ask you if it's okay to jump out of airplanes? >> that is a very good question. >> bob: thank you. >> no. absolutely not. but you know what? i love it, he loves it. he's very safe. trust me. nobody would let him be hurt. he says it's the most wonde wonderful feeling. it also shows, i'll clean it up, old guys can do something. you don't have to sit down and dribble.

>> bob: you must be a little nervous. have you watched him come down from the sky? >> yeah, but he is sitting in someone's lap. he's going to do it when he is 90. >> bob: i'd have to sit in ten people's lap. >> i'd watch that if i were you. >> bob: let me do a follow-up question. mitt romney who you know quite well, the rap on romney he doesn't connect well with the average voters out there. i have a little theory about that. a lot of it is has been beat up a lot in the presidential primary system. why do you think that is the case that the perception is that? and is the perception wrong? >> yes. it's very wrong. i don't want to make you feel sensitive about this, but i think the press has really built that up. it's not true. he's very warm. people who meet him, like him very, very much. i think the press has done that because in truth, 95% of the press is for the president. that's okay.

but they shouldn't do it. i mean they -- i don't think they are giving him a fair shake frankly. >> dana: mrs. bush, we have kimberly guilfoyle here, who is a wonderful working mom. raising a young 5-year-old son. and a great, amazing talent. has been in politics and also been a prosecutor and she has a president. >> kimberly: former first lady of a little place called san francisco, different politics. a pleasure to have you on the program. big admirer of yours, as we all are at the table. what advice do you have for ann romney going forward? this has been contentious season. we would expect it to be worse. what would you say to her in how to best help her husband? >> i think she has and has shown a human side. people aren't so tough on the wives. ann is a wonderful woman. she has multiple sclerosis and

spent three years on her back in the bed until she discovered horseback brought her back. she never talked about that, never whined. it introduced her at something in houston the other day. she is full of energy. she is wonderful. no whining no, complaining. i think she shows people the warm side of mitt. you know, not everybody is a george bush. look at it that way. either one of them. >> eric: i love to have you on and a big fan of your son and your husband. i represent a very i guess i could say the far right, conservative movement.

there is some concern about his flip-flopping. can you clear that up? >> i can't clear it up. you do what you have to do to make it work. he has blown in his belief. one just always believe the same thing and stuck with it and never changed your mind, you'd be no good at all. i don't think he flip-floped truthfully, but anyway. i think he is wonderful and he had to do what he had to do in massachusetts. look what he did for the olympics? he has done wonderful thing. i never go in to staples, but i think mitt romney put this together. he is a businessman. he can do a good job. don't talk about that. talk about the good side of him. >> dana: i'm so glad you told him that. i have been telling him that for months. >> that a-girl, dana. before we ask you about the former favorite president, george bush, greg gutfeld is a co-host and has a question.

>> greg: great to have you here. my mother was born the same year, you were born. >> 1925. >> greg: exactly. she is still, you know, she's a lot like you. i was wondering what is the appropriate mother's day gift for somebody born in 1925? >> every day is mother's day. that's what we say at our house. every day is mother's day. >> greg: so that means i don't have to get her a gift? >> no. but you have to love her and take her out, do the nice things you're supposed to do. at our house, all of our children, all ten counting the in-laws, every day is mother's day. >> greg: i'll get her a gift. >> tell her i'm against mother's day. it's a commercial whatever. i don't dare let them get me anything. >> dana: thank you, dana. >> bob: can i ask you one more question before i let you go? this is bob beckel again. do your husband and bill clinton get along as well as they look like they get along? >> bill is like his son. they get along very, very well.

he and george w. get along very well, because they are working for a cause. and bill is very sweet to my husband, whose legs won't work. so he keeps in touch. he came up in may in the summer and spent, had lunch. they tease me. my boy, bill. but he is really -- we like him very, very much. truthfully. >> dana: could we get one last word from you, mrs. bush. everyone here wants to send our regards through you to the former president. if you could give us a quick update on how he is doing? >> he is wonderful, but his legs say no. they freeze and they won't move. it's horrible for him. but he's such a good sport. he looks beautiful. he looks about 30 years younger than me still. but he is a wonderful, thoughtful, everybody should be so lucky to be married to george bush. >> dana: it's an amazing love story. i love to look back over today about how you met and all the

things that you did. i remember this summer before i had moved to new york, you talked to me about how much you loved being here when he was ambassador to the united nations. i'm here, and trying to take advantage of it per your advice. getting out and seeing plays and walking the city. >> walking the streets. walking the streets in new york. i can't say george had a love affair with new york. every time someone threw a bomb at somebody it was his fault, he was the ambassador. i loved it. clean sheets every night. hotel did tall work. i loveed it. >> dana: we love it. we love you both. thank you so much for coming on today. >> thank you. >> all right. bye. >> dana: all right. mrs. bush, we want to thank her very much. he is gives me the -- she gives me the goosebumps. coming up, we move on to something else. friday, they pulled the plug on the volt because no one wants to buy it. guess what? they blame the media. eric bolling, our resident volt expert and cit lick

respond. don't forget you can e-mail us at thefive@foxnews.com. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ >> eric: we own this story. friday, g.m. shut down production of the chevy volt. 72 hours after the campaigner-in-chief said this. >> i got to get inside a brand new chevy volt right off the line. it's nice. it bet it drives really good. five years from now when i'm not president anymore, i'll buy one and drive it myself. >> eric: he said five years. all right. just a month ago, general motors walked in my office on 12 to talk about my harsh tone toward green energy; specifically, their new chevy volt. i immediately offered to test drive the car for a week and make an honest assessment. that is me in the car right there. range on a full charge was a mere 26 miles for me. and two days in a row, i ran out of charge inside the

lincoln tunnel. there it is. right there. i captured that on my cell phone. now i'll take a look at the ad g.m. is running. >> this isn't just the car we wanted to build. it's the car america had to build. the extented range electric chevy volt. >> eric: the car america had to build, or the car g.m. had to build to justify obama's agenda, the redistribution agenda, taking $50 billion in taxpayers, usurping 150 years of investor confidence and greasing the palm of the union pals that contribute to the re-elect obama campaign. sleazy, cronyism at its worst. i don't blame g.m. it blame the obama administration and the uaw. that's where the deal lies. >> bob: terrible thing. made general motors go from a company bankrupt to number one company in the world, number one. number two, all cars at one time or another come off the

assembly line. in this case, they did blame for good reason people like you and the media who dutched on the car so hard -- who dumped on the car so hard. i know you are trying to get out of the ad we had to do because the government made us do it. they said we had to do it because it's the future. anyone at the table think they'll drive gas-guzzling cars from now until the day they die are kidding themselves. >> eric: greg? >> greg: you know when you donate -- i've never done this. but you donate to pb s and you get a tote bag that is totally useless but makes you feel good? the volt is a tote bag with a battery. when you buy, it makes you feel good. the world's largest neck massageer. you know what a neck massageer. i don't think the government has gone far enough. >> eric: a couple of them started on fire. >> kimberly: not all of them. >> greg: the government paid

to build it. now we should pay people to buy it. >> eric: they are kind of paying people to buy it. >> greg: like the birth control pill on wheels. >> dana: unfortunately for the 1300 workers who were working at this plant and doing a good job, the market is not there. the technology is not there yet and the cars are too expensive. i take issue -- i don't take issue. it hear system take wish the white house trying to take credit for the turn-around of the company. yes, they authorize the money, but the people who were actually working at the company who had the strategy to help turn it around. >> eric: $250,000 is the estimate, the amount of taxpayers that went in to developing every single volt that rolled off the line so far, kimberly. at $46,000, that's how much the car i was driving ran. $46,000. i would take you driving the average amount of miles per year, around ten years to even come close to breaking even on that car versus a prius or another -- >> kimberly: but he is saying we have an obligation

as a country to try to move forward with respect to the energy concerns and we have to find alternative ways to power our cars. this is what they are trying to do. is it the right call for the government to subsidize and put money into something that wasn't ready for prime time? that is the issue. on the taxpayers' back. >> bob: my responsibility is put the fact out. ford, first model of the model-t that henry ford built, started mass development of cars, funded initially with the big support from federal government, one. two, the union workers you say, retirees took a hit on healthcare. current people on the floor took a cut in their pay and cut in their healthcare. the idea they got it something off of this is silly. dana is right, they worked hard on this and they will be back to work. if it was up to you, they wouldn't be working at all. >> eric: the uaw was handed $4.5 billion worth of g.m. stock for nothing. for this big outlay that you are claiming. first, can i ask you this?

what is so earth friendly about using electricia electrico charge a car? half comes from coal anyway. >> bob: we're years away from a battery to work and make it run. all of these thanks take a while. right now it takes coal burning in the air to get the batteries to be charged, right? you can almosting that is a coal car. that's one of the arguments against it. i agree with it. all the things take time. there will come a day in the not too distant future every car is powered partially by electricity. >> greg: i have a solution to make volt a success. if you buy a volt, $48,000, you get a clunker with it. remember cash for clunkers? so they have cars that are still around that actually work. they're better than the volt. >> dana: but you can't go in the hov lane in clunker. >> greg: that is true. tow the volt, which is basically a government funded arts and crafts project.

>> bob: do you own a car? >> greg: yeah. i own two cars. they're in pennsylvania. >> kimberly: i had one that worked well. but it got recalled and they came and took it from the house and i don't know what happened to it. >> bob: you will have plenty of battery cars. >> eric: the car, the volt car itself is a great car. it drove nicely. holds 26 miles, took me ten hours to charge it to get 26 miles. >> bob: you should haven't put the rap music on so loud. air conditioner on. >> eric: i used the heater. sorry, i guess i should haven't used the heater while driving. coming up, eric holder gives out a huge promotion in the department of justice for a guy that proudly defended the american terrorist. john walker lindh. did they really think we weren't going to notice? ♪ ♪ 

♪ ♪ ♪ >> bob: welcome back to "the five." trying to clarify something over here for a second. it turns out eric holder was speaking on the hill today. when asked what the legal grounds were for the united states to kill an american citizen involved terrorism. if you will remember, the american citizen named al-awlaki was killed by our forces who was actively involved in terrorism against the united states. holder said in his testimony in brief, first, the u.s. determined after careful review that individual poses a threat, vie lect attack in the united states. second, capture is not feasible. third, the operation should be

conducted consistent with the ablickable law of war principles. are they on firm legal ground here? >> kimberly: he absolutely is. i agree with the attorney general eric holder on this. there is a precedent here. established by a joint congressional resolution. after the attack of september 11 to protect the u.s. from terrorist attack, international harm coming. it makes a lot of sense. it's been a very successful program. the other issue is that the number of lawsuits, three in particular, that have been brought forward to get the information is held in a secret memo regarding the justification for killing anwar al-awlaki, or triple-a as they refer to him. >> eric: i misspoke. this is a speech he was givin giving. immediately, the aclu, one of my favorite groups, attacked from the left. you were involved in how

holder held back information. different holder here. >> dana: i think when you become attorney general, maybe you do look at things differently. you have different responsibilities. what it was, two years ago, my former colleague and i bill burke who wrote for national review, we revealed information, broke news story which i haven't done maybe ever in my life even when i was a cub scout reporter, he had not disclosed he had defended jose padilla, the accused dirty bomber and he went through the whole senate testimony. >> holder had? >> dana: he, holder not defended by filed a friend of the court brief. >> kimberly: his law firm does. >> dana: he signed it. he did it. that is something that people look at now and say who is this guy? the policy sounds right to me and makes me feel safer. if george w. bush articulated this policy or gonzalez or

manssoashashcroft had done it, y would have been worse. >> bob: we have our own woodward and bernstein. >> greg: if you talk about the aboutface in the progressive movement, amazing how much right wing activity is embraced by the left. simply being silent. going ah, it's okay. it's different under obama. everything is different. >> bob: aclu came out with a statement. >> greg: that's right. >> eric: it almost seems like he is now making a statement because we took out anwar al-awlaki with a drone. maybe wants to continue to do that, which is great. fantastic. all for it. what about this appointing, or promoting the d.o.j. guy west. >> kimberly: tony west to the number three position. >> eric: defended terrorist and now they will put this guy

in position to dictate policy. >> greg: it's done to make holder look moderate. b. the fact is the law firm defended them ten years ago. >> kimberly: this individual defended john walker lindh. is this the important position to be given the number three position. is he being groomed? some speculate will holder step down and won't be there for the next administration should the president win re-election? as a former prosecutor we don't like someone come in to start to run the office whose ties are with defending terrorists. different philosophy. >> bob: one case of probably thousands that he was involved in. >> bob: john walker lindh was the american taliban guy. the policy that holder is talking about today, one reason that he --

>> eric: you think it's a reason to keep him -- >> bob: no. >> eric: maybe not. we have didn't know about it, never brought up that this guy disclosed in the past. no disclosure that tony west not only defended john walker lindh but the law firm defended other terrorists. that would have been good to know prior to promoting west. >> bob: what happened to the right wing investigator people? >> bob: we say that because we get heat from you. >> greg: i'm probably the most -- aside from kimberly, i know the most about law. because i watch "the good wife" on sunday night. and will guardner's sisters are ruining the show. you have to defend your client. if his client is american terrorist, he has to defend the person. saw it on "law and order" and "l.a. law." it's clearly true. you get a sense -- there is a weird ideology at work with holder. a sense that america is always at the root of the problem.

which is why certain cases are more important than others. a sense that we are the problem. >> bob: we don't have time to get into this today but try to tomorrow. two more americans were killed in afghanistan over the weekend. raising again the question of why we are there. are americans too dumb to pick a president? i think we did pretty good picking the last one, the current one we have now. a new study says most people may be too dumb for democracy. greg's monologue on that. you don't want to miss this. it's going to be crazy. that's up next. [ male announcer ] you never know when,

but thieves can steal your identity. turning your life upside down in a matter of seconds. hi. hi. you know i can save you 15% today if you open up a charge card account with us. you just read my mind. [ male announcer ] just one little piece of information and they can open bogus accounts, stealing your credit, your money, and ruining your reputation. that's why you need lifelock. lifelock is the leader in identity theft protection. relentlessly protecting your personal information

to help stop the crooks in their tracks before your identity is attacked. protecting your social security number, your bank accounts, even the equity in your home. i didn't know how serious identity theft was until i lost my credit and eventually i lost my home. [ male announcer ] credit monitoring alone is not enough to protect your identity, and only tells you after the fact, sometimes as much as 60 days later. with lifelock, as soon as we spot a threat to your identity within our network, our advanced lifelock id alert system directly notifies you, protecting your identity before you become a victim. identity theft was a huge, huge problem for me. and it's gone away because of lifelock. [ male announcer ] while no one can stop all identity theft, if the criminals do manage to steal your information, lifelock is there to help fix it with our $1 million service guarantee. that's right. a $1 million service guarantee. don't wait until you become the next victim. call now to try lifelock risk free for 2 full months. that's right, 60 days risk free.

use promo code: norisk. if you're not completely satisfied, notify lifelock and you won't pay a cent. order now and also get this document shredder to keep your personal documents out of the wrong hands. a $29 value, free! get the protection you need right now. call or go to lifelock.com to try lifelock risk free for a full 60 days. use promo code: norisk. plus get this document shredder, free! but only if you act right now. call now! lifelock service guarantee cannot be offered to residents of new york.

that's at 6:00 p.m. now back to my colleagues at "the five." ♪ ♪ freddie welcom

>> greg: welcome back to "the five." according to a slink at cor nel university, citizens are incapable of understanding democracy. david dunning says smart ideas will be hard for people to adopt because most people don't have the sophistication to recognize how good an idea is. translation: unwashed primitives, leave everything to us. we're gathering in the teachers lounge to make every decision for you. relax, we've got this. someone find my bong. researchers like dunning must not be smart enough for democracy. luckily the way things are going he won't have to be. the federal government will make every decision for us advised by the ivy league professors from carnel no, doubt. academics miss the freedom of choice without assessing the alternative. i'll do this for them. what happens with academic with utopian ideas takes over? you get social engineering that forces reform that end in death from normally nonfatal ills. after that, waves of torture

and execution arrives when citizens react to the nightmare. it ends in famine or genocide, take your pick. 100 million victims did. >> bob: what are you talking about? >> greg: what am i talking about? what am i talking about? >> bob: it sounds like you were describing obama and then you go to genocide -- >> greg: no, no, no. i was saying they were saying we cannot elect good leaders. i'm saying what are the a terptives if you don't like democracy? >> eric: people can't or democrats can't? >> greg: this was a vailed attack on conservatives. >> kimberly: yet. not so vailed. >> bob: that was a good joke. >> eric: bob, you were the one -- >> bob: i'm not going to defend what he said but most of the candidates out there don't know what they're talking about. for the average american it's not fair to dump on them because they don't know the intricacys of the mideast, israel, palestine. very few people know it well. those who do know it well are

generally wrong. what is it about the set of ideas that the voters are supposed to stop what they're doing, try to make a living and stop and figure out what is going on in the mideast? that is a cheap shot at people. >> dana: can you imagine the seminars at cornell based on this study. yes, that's so true. people really can't. it's like watching an episode of "downston abby." i've been watching it and i can't help myself with the accent. like in the old days, the great unwashed cannot govern themselves. >> greg: they're poor things. half just don't understand it. kimberly, they are saying since we aren't experts we cannot evaluate. like saying you could not go shopping until you go to shopping school. >> kimberly: right. >> dana: thankfully we went yesterday. >> kimberly: got the top grade in the class in shopping school. this elitist, arrogant and ridiculous. putting down the american people.

it's direct, i don't think it's a vailed attack on conservative. this is the same thing we have seen from professors all the time. they have too much time on their hand and they sit around and drink coffee to come up with ways to insult the american people. >> eric: elitist, and timely. i went on breitbart's site last night. they relaunched. there is video from people sitting around the seiu, wall street and liberal progressive thinkers, free thinkers and they are talking about the same thing. how they know better than capitalist. how they know better than the current way we do government. they are smarter than us. a matter of time before they fix everything. >> dana: people are like -- >> kimberly: just like healthcare. want to take everything over. >> bob: i think there is 30% of the country that are elitist. 70% are not. my definition of elitist is people who think they know what is best for the other 70%. that is the problem. they always think -- that is not just the democratic thing. it's not just a professor

thing. the fact is that most people are not as informed on campaign issues. they shouldn't have to be. three, but more importantly, i don't think the candidates are informed; particularly, what you support. >> dana: let me mention one thing. if you look at revolutions and history. think about what has happened in hit the the last few weeks. there are people literally dying for freedom in hit the. radio free asia -- freedom in thibet. they reported on so many people, including women self-emulating, setting themselves afire and committing suicide because they are trying to make a statement they want to self-govern. they believe they can do it. that's why something like that, they spend money on studies that tell people they don't know how to govern themselves. given a choice, people always choose freedom. they do a good job of it. >> bob: they are among the nicest people, tibetan people. peaceful people. >> dana: there is serious problems and radio free asia

is all over reporting. >> bob: good. >> eric: we can figure out a way to get the wall street and liberals on that site. >> bob: there is an idea. >> dana: don't say that. >> kimberly: eric! >> bob: johnny one note. whose story is this? greg. >> kimberly: my gosh. >> greg: coming up. the story that never seems to go away. the contraception controversy continues. if you leave now, i'll leave a nasty comment on your website. ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] when do you take 5-hour energy? when i'm on the night shift. when they have more energy than i do. when i don't feel like working out. when there isn't enough of me to go around. ♪ when i have school. and work. every morning. it's faster and easier than coffee. every afternoon when that 2:30 feeling hits.

-every day. -every day. every day is a 5-hour energy day. [ male announcer ] 5-hour energy. every day.

♪ ♪ >> kimberly: well, by now you probably heard the story about sandra fluke, the contraception activist a law school student at georgetown, forcing the catholic university to cover birth control for women. the mainstream media reported this as a story about contraception. but catholics, conservatives and many others disagree. newt gingrich says the media isn't covering the story accurately. >> this is the most fundamental assault on religious liberty in american

history, despite every effort by the elite media to distort what it does. it's not about access to contraception. people who want to can get access to contraception every day. that young lady can get access to contraception. it's a question whether or not religious affiliated institution should be cohearseed by the federal government. >> kimberly: like the way he frames the argument? >> greg: yeah, that's what newt can do. i have no interest in name-calling that ruins any debate. when the president of the united states call an individual, an adult, 30-year-old person who in a sense demanding a religious institution to subsidize everyone's sex life it reflects a culture to me is crumbling, culture morally corrupt, intellectually bankrupt. it make me saturday and embarrassed that there -- it makes me sad and embarrassed that there are adulting demanding something they can afford and based on their lifestyle choice.

if you don't give in, you are the culprit. you're the bad guy. pains me that this has become a debate of something else entirely. >> bob: become something else? they made this a pryma fascia case of why obama is at war with the catholic church. give me a break. at war with the cath rick church in the election year? who in their right mind would do that? >> greg: how did it start? >> dana: the war on women has also become a rallying cry from the left against people like me. i certainly reject what was said on the radion't be sandra fluke. but i don't, i am not going to back down and say that i think that it is okay for the got to force any religious institution to do anything. i'm not going to back down. i have asked the question, asked this summer, you know, i

trust women to make choices about their own healthcare. but i know i have had to make priorities in my life. when i was starting out and didn't make money, paycheck to paycheck you have to figure out how you pay for certain things you prioritize it and figure it out. i trust women to make decisions on their healthcare as well as with their budget. >> greg: entitlement culture made it so you don't have to. >> kimberly: eric? >> eric: i'm a catholic. this is obama's war against catholicism, catholic church. there is no reason to make it mandated. no reason to make it mandated no co-pay, a big part of the problem. good job. take your eye off the ball, economy may be coming around a little bit, pick a fight with the catholic church. >> bob: you can argue about obama but he and his team are pretty good politicians. they would not be picking a fight unnecessarily.

so i don't get it in trouble saying something that is fact. is it not the case that georgetown university where she is from offers contraception in their insurance policy to the staff and the faculty? >> eric: i believe they don't. >> dana: i have no idea. i don't care. >> eric: i believe they don't. >> bob: i believe they do. open question. >> greg: from activists to -- kilit is that is the sad part of it. >> bob: if that is right and they do offer it to the faculty and the staff, then it seems to me to be totally disingenuous they would say that students could not have it. one. and two -- >> eric: why? give it away? it's an entitlement that students deserve? >> kimberly: you don't have a right to have government funded sex. do you? what are we going to do supply a partner? so sorry, you can't get someone on the weekend we'll give you a date, too. >> bob: if you're a christian scientist why don't they mandate having your heart

fixed? >> dana: i don't think they should mandate anyone to do anything. >> bob: if you have insurance policy, right? and it says it can help you if you have the bad heart and christian science don't want it. >> kimberly: listen to this quick. i want reaction from you. listen to this sound about the varying opinions about that. >> i think this is about women's health. that's what it's all been about for me and for the many, many americans who are e-mailing me constantly, telling me how important is it to them. for them and me it's accessible affordable access to basic healthcare service. >> who is trying to impose what on two? we are not trying to impose our teaching on anybody. we are simply saying don't impose your teaching upon us. and make douse as a church what we find unconscionable to do. >> greg: at some point in

the hearing she referred to this as untenable burden. you have don't know what burdens are, if that is your burden. there are people with serious illnesses out there with real problems. >> dana: with that point and international women's day on thursday, i would support all the women, take the money spent on this and send it to women who need the help like those in africa. >> kimberly: i couldn't agree more. that is for another show, bob. thank you for participating. one more thing is coming up next. you have don't want to miss i -- you don't want

♪ ♪ >> dana: welcome back to "the five." time for one more thing. i was going to mention steve bridges, a good friend of ours and entertainer in america, he died over the weekend at age 48. what i remember most in 2006, when he and george w. bush surprised the corespondents dinner with this little bit. >> i'm going to pretend i like being here. media really ticks me off. the way they try to embarrass me by not editing what i say. >> dana: i love that.

a great entertainer. he will be missed. >> eric: fox and friends first kicked off this morning 59:00 a.m. this sound bite says it all. take a look, guys. >> we're going to give you a daily word scramble to see if you can figure this out. we don't know the word either so we are in this together. here is your hint. jump-start on getting ahead. let's see the word. >> let's see it. i hear we're going to bring in brian kilmeade. can you get that word? a word in the news. we'll do it at the end of every show. what do you think? >> i think if i wait long enough it will all be revealed. anybody in the studio -- >> kindergarten. thank you! >> eric: that is all. great show. by the way. love it. >> dana: we'll save brian. >> kimberly: watch the girls. it's a great show. watch the girls. this is a really heartwarming story as dana and eric will love it because it involves good boy. lucas and juneau, a special

relationship between the two, right? little boy there with a neurological metabolic disease called san felipo. reduced life span, et cetera, for him, the expectation is. this dog was rescued and he has saved little boy's life already. >> greg: i'll read a tweet i saw from yoko. be kind once a day, even if it's just in your mind. >> bob: there was a reference to what was said about miss fluke by rush limbaugh. inappropriate statement. but rush to his credit came back within a few days and apologized. as someone who has said many things, and you all know this, that are inappropriate and i apologized, the forgiving culture that we are. if you remember, a forgiving religion, time to forgive rush and move on. >> dana: well said. thanks. see you tomorrow.