>> hello, everyone. i'm kimberly guilfoyle. it's 5:00 o'clock in new york city. this is "the five". >> david and samantha, great purpose and design of our alliance. may we remain now and always faith. service. cheers, everyone. >> i propose a toast to the president, to the first lady, and to the people of the united states of america. cheers. >> what time is it? party time at the white house last night 'cause president obama was hosting a state dinner for british prime minister david cameron. as is tradition, they exchanged toasts, they took pictures pictd ate a bunch of good food. "the five" of us didn't make the cut. unacceptable. guess who did? of course, you've got the

diplomats, the political, media types, but also dozens of obama's biggest bundlers. big shots like warren buffet and even a list celebrities like george clooney who was asked about it today. >> it was really nice. i really enjoyed the evening. i was very impressed with the prime minister and his wife as well. >> all right. so boling, you're probably not going to be on the president's list any time soon. but aren't you bff's bob, with layers at the white house? was your invitation lost? >> no, it's because i'm a friend of eric's and i will not give up that friendship on some cheap dinner. >> you have the boling taint? >> i've been to a statinner and so has dark ana. i want to go through the course here they had last night. now, chris with potato crisp. shaved brussel sprouts. how do you shave a brussel sprout?

>> you got to hold them down? >> you do? spring garden lettuce and shallot dressing, shaved breakfast radish. they shave again. they get all these vegetables and shave them. >> country of metro sexuals. everybody is shaving. >> here is the main course. bison wellington. in other words, they shot all those buffalo so they could make beef wellington, which is terrible anyway. >> a very american thing to do. serve bison. >> french beans that. ain't american. >> they don't get anything past you. >> and onions. >> i could do without that. >> if i could say in your opening about the people who were invited, let me give you a little secret about the white house parties. everybody in the white house invites or is asked for a list and they can confirm this. the press is asked for a list and you submit your list. some make the cut, some don't. every state dinner. every one has contributors to the president of the united

states at their state dinner. i know that was a breath taking thing to say, but it is a fact that happens all the time. >> but that's not the thing -- i agree with bob. that's not the thing that strikes me. the thing is it feels like the white house has become the cool kids' table of america where all the rich and famous hang out and make fun of the ugly kids. >> in a democratic administration. >> exactly. republicans it's a little different. then it's just the rich kids. >> i don't know if anyone saw karl rove call out the "wall street journal" about the burn rate. i think it was quite smart and efficient to have the official dinner along with a meeting of the reelect obama finance committee there in the same room. it was very effective. 50 bundlers in one dinner is quite a lot. that's more than you guys have, right? >> i hope you appreciate my sticking with you, buddy, and -- >> and not going? >> yeah. >> that was very nice of you.

>> thank you. >> i'm glad you're outraged at the menu. >> i wouldn't like the food anyway. i don't like anything shaved. >> gillette must be a supporter of the obamas. >> if you're a bundler, you're treat to do a lot of the spoilers. if it's not a state dinner, maybe a job at the department of energy where you can hand out solyndra loans or maybe 80% of the energy loans that were given out, the green energy loans were given to friends of obama. i mean, there are so many things that go with being friends of the obamas. >> you have no idea of the impact you've had on this state dinner. for example, secretary shu was not invited. >> i did see that. >> they're listening to you. look, it is a large amount of bundlers, it's true. he was on the list. i was told he was on the list. maybe his car broke down on the way over. let me just say this about karl rove's article on a serious

note. the burn rate is much higher than it was when bush was moving into reelection. the difference is that karl and the republicans concentrate on get out to vote and high targeting near the end. the obama people are concentrating on building organization which is are very expensive and you do spend that kind of money. >> they spent $354,000 on that 17 minute documentary that's coming out this week. >> it's a great documentary. >> how do you call it a documentary when it's clearly a campaign ad? i want to hear about dana's experience. >> i thought the first lady looked fantastic. i absolutely loved fish and state dinners. i don't know if we would have gotten away with calling it a state dinner 'cause cameron is not the official head of state. that would be the queen of england and i was able to go to the queen of england when president bush had it, but i actually had to sit at the kids table basically. this is another one. this is with berlusconi. that was my dad. >> good to have your dad. >> yeah.

>> my dad and president bush, making sure -- that was really special to have my dad come. we had a lot of italian americans there that night. and the queen one was funny. we had to sit at this table that was like the overflow table. but i ended up getting to sit next to a woman from liverpool originally, but she was the queen's dresser. the way she had gotten the job is because she had been so discreet when she was working in the embassy for the british in germany and the queen asked where she had been before and she wouldn't say and the queen said you ought to hire her. >> i didn't get my -- i got invite to do one for the president of -- it was a latin american country. the first mistake i made was i thought the finger bowl was the soup. so i went to get my spoon and to go to the finger bowl and this lady nicely said, that's not the

soup. i said, oh okay. >> is that your finger bowl? >> i had to ask that question 'cause there are so many things lined up. there is like 15 forks and knives and stuff like that. i don't have that many total in my apartment. >> i have my own state dinners since i'm not often invited. i'll get all my stuffed animals and surround them around the tv tray and i feed them colored cotton balls. it's adorable. captain sparkles is there. raggedy andy. he's not much of a conversationalist. but he is a big donor. >> i hear he's a bundler. >> i have a question. bob, did we give a state dinner for bb netanyahu when he was here, probably our closest ally in the middle east? >> no. >> no. >> did he have a photo op? did they go to a basketball game together? >> this is pretty stuff to be dealing with over there and they

had some pretty lengthy discussions and i think netanyahu put the word out he was much more satisfied with the discussion. i think the president probably would have been better off, it was suggested to me, i tried to pass it on. they might have said he was sorry for the last time they were there. but this time around it seems they made some good progress. i think it's a good thing. did they have a state dipper? no. but i don't think he's the prime minute -- >> i think the cameron-obama relationship is a lot like the blair-bush one and the clinton-blair one. it's good for us, but there was a lot of criticism that president bush got when he did the state dinner for the president of china. >> it's also who you want to sit next to. i had one little -- >> could i make a point that this state dinner under -- going to the white house, it's like an oscar ceremony for progressive celebrities. if you play the right left wing role, the trophy that you get is a seat at the table. the only thing more left wing

would be like a pool party at the pilot bureau. >> reagan was -- john wayne. >> john wayne is an american icon. >> clint eastwood was there. the one thing, the fighting in the white house as dana will confirm as who gets the cuts, if they put in 15 names and get three seats, they go ballistic. the state department goes ballistic if they don't get all their diplomats in. always national security advisor is there and always the -- it's about five or six givens and the press secretary. >> who invites the journalists? >> the press secretary's office does put in a list that says here is the people we think are deserving. >> richard wolf, who is british originally. >> these are all the fabulous celebrities are there. richard branson, george clooney. >> i like that dress. >> a gala affair. also one of the things is we

talked about, you're going to discuss, one of my goals was to be at a dinner and sit next to prince charles, which i got to do in san francisco. you might have heard of it. and so i was next to -- who am i there with? >> your first husband? >> yeah, thank you, bob. but there i am with camilla and charles and that was doing the official duties and having bacon. he gave me his apple tart for dessert. i would like to sit to now, hillary. ask her why she's not run not guilty 2012. >> i wanted to sit next to cameron's wife, 'cause she's a good woman. >> i love you, bob. >> is this like grandma's day. did you like her dress? i didn't like the dress. >> i didn't either. >> no. >> not good. >> i would like to sit next to you guys at a dinner. wouldn't that be fantastic if we got invited? >> i wouldn't be holding your breath on that.

>> maybe you can get us invited. they e-mail you -- >> dana, who would you sit next to? >> i couldn't decide today who i would like to sit next to, so i put out on twitter. i asked people who would you want to sit next to. somebody said al gore so all night long they could say, is it me or is it freezing in here? >> i would just like to be a fly on the wall and then i could try to find food in harvey weinstein's beer. >> i love it. directly ahead, we have a stunning admission about liberal bias from a prominent editor in the main stream media. who said it? what did he admit? back with that answer in moments and more intriguing things. don't forget to e-mail us at the fife at foxnews.com. >> i think you're happy today. >> i can't wait !

[♪...] >> announcer: bank robbery certainly is a frightening crime. after all, bank robbers stole $43 million in one year. but identity thieves? try 37 billion! and guess how identity thieves are getting some of that money. by taking over our bank accounts. they may not even need your social security number anymore. all an identity thief may need

are a couple of simple pieces of information, like your mother's maiden name or the city you were born in, and they could add their name onto your bank accounts in order to make your money their money. you need help. [whoosh, clang] you need lifelock-- the only identity theft protection company that now monitors bank accounts for takeover fraud. lifelock is the proactive identity theft protection company, with an early warning alert system that is state of the art. when we detect any suspected breaches of your personal information within our network, we contact you right away, before the damage is done. lifelock has the most comprehensive identity theft protection available. no one can stop all identity theft-- that's why lifelock offers you peace of mind, and you get our million dollar total service guarantee. >> having your identity stolen feels like you've been totally violated. you go around looking over your shoulder. it's almost as if someone has broken into your home. >> announcer: don't spend another day without lifelock. call now. try lifelock's service

risk-free for 60 days. lifelock is the only identity theft protection company that now monitors bank accounts for takeover fraud. no one provides more comprehensive identity theft protection than lifelock. if you're not convinced within 60 days, simply notify lifelock and you won't pay. and to keep your documents out of the wrong hands, we'll even add this personal shredder-- a $29 value-- absolutely free with your enrollment. don't wait another minute. call the number on your screen now, promo code: alerts. lifelock service guarantee cannot be offered to residents of new york.

>> welcome back. it should come as no surprise to

smart fox viewers like yourself that there is a strong liberal bias in the main stream media. newsweek goes out of its way to impugne conservatives. msnbs line - up is a wash with progressive bias. but rarely do we get an on camera admission by the leftist kabul as explicit as this. >> our reporters bias. there is to doubt that i've worked at the "wall street journal," the "washington post," worked here at politico and if i had to guess, if you put all the reporters on truth serum, most of them vote democratic. >> wait, did the head honcho at politico just admit that most reporters he knows votes democrat? play it again, please. >> if you put all the reporters i've ever worked on truth serum, most of them vote democratic. >> wow. fair and balanced? not so much. huh, bob? >> first of all, this guy can't hold a job pretty clearly. so i mean, how many places did he work?

>> that's not unusual. >> i know! >> in the world of reporters. >> i'm sorry. you need a job, let us know. >> do we have jobs to give? >> greg does. >> outright admission that just about everyone he works with is a democrat and votes democrat. >> finding out that reporters vote democrats is like finding out water is wet. i like to see how the media responds to this. it used to be the first step was to deny it. like it's not true. then the next step was okay. yeah, we're biased. then the third step was, so what? then they would go raid their mini bar. but the fact is, they can't keep saying so what. they got to do something about it. >> what about it? politico is all over msnbc. you can't turn on a show and they don't get a politico editor on there saying something. but -- n they should have a slash next to it. >> he does. >> you have all the sees on. this isn't shocking. it's like the pope is catholic.

okay. >> but that's the whole point. >> reporters vote democratic. >> this has been said over and over again. one of the reasons is most of these people go to the schools of journalism and if you've been to columbus school of journalism or one of the others, they are mostly democratic, liberal schools and that's what you're going to get. what's the big deal? >> the big deal is that, that's the point of my -- >> start a conservative right wing journal school. >> or a fair and balanced network that is phenomenonnally successful that they come after because they aren't towing the line -- >> talk about kissing up to the bosses. >> when it comes to reporters, if you are in politics, especially if you're a republican, you can't live with them and you can't live without them. you got to figure out a way to coexist. >> you know how it do that. >> yeah. >> i think most reporters that i worked with, i'm saying most, not all -- they did try to be fair. even if they had to swallow

sometimes what they personally thought. i could name a few off the top of my head that i think were pretty fair. >> also they counter balance themselves. for example, they were all off and oning over observe o observe when he ran. let's face it, obama has not had the best press for a lot of reasons -- >> wait, wait, whoa, whoa, where? >> they've been rough on him. i find reporters if they go overboard one way, they'll try to compensate it. >> hold on. >> they have to at some point report the fact. >> today's "new york times," the story is women figure new with latest battle. here it is above the fold, very important prominent spot. it's not until page 24 of this story that you realize, this little thing that's going on with women in the white house, isn't working for obama. his numbers are down. >> you got to be careful. you won't get your obituary in here. >> speaking of the "new york times," yesterday there was an

opinion piece published in the "new york times" from a goldman sachs employee, 12-year employee, who was resigning, very high profile resignation. why would the "new york times" publish that? >> i think there is no doubt editorial pages have agendas and they have positions. it's very difficult for any pr person out there to get an op ed placed in the "new york times." it's prized space. this guy who worked for goldman sachs, he had an ax to grind and maybe, i don't know, if it's on the merits or not. he'll be forgotten in a few days. this caused a huge stir because he questioned his employers' integrity as if going to work at a bank was something -- it's not like going to serve in africa at an hiv clinic. then the "new york times" does something interesting. they put it out sunday night. now it's on the front page of their news side. i think that was the plan all along. my point on this being, if someone from the "new york times" had worked with the new

york -- i was reporter -- left and wrote an op ed that ran in the daily call that are said, "new york times" editorial staff is all left wing biased, the "new york times" would totally blow it off, which is basically what goldman did to this guy. >> wait a second. >> it's banker bashing. >> wait a second. >> they were the evil doers of the world and it's not obama's fault. >> this guy is a south african. he got a scholarship and went to oxford as a roads scholar. it's not some loser. let's see what he says. you tell me if you don't think this is what goldman sachs is like. it makes me ill how callusly people talk about ripping off clients, the interest of the clients continues to be sidelined in the way -- >> what's that got to do with -- >> that may or may not be true. >> he tells the truth about goldman sachs. >> should the "new york times" publish an op ed by a guy who is a disgruntled employee? would they publish one leaving -- >> media matters?

>> i know why. >> because he's 12 years and vice president position there where he should have already been promoted and everybody on wall street knows that. >> you think that goldman sachs doesn't in any way make fun of their clients -- >> i feel sorry for the guy 'cause how much did he make? he made, what, 750 grand. janet robinson when she walked away with $24 million from the "new york times." 24 million packaged. >> he was in the wrong profession. >> charlie gas perino took this guy on. he's smart. his sources for this guy being sour grapes was guess what, his friends at goldman sachs. give may break. >> no one is saying whether this guy was right or wrong. the question is, did it deserve a very high prosecute profile op ed in the "new york times"? >> the "new york times," sure. >> unless there is an agenda. why not? >> goldman sachs does a lot of

good. like dina powell runs the woman program. >> they do some good work, that's true. but to suggest that this is -- anyway. i think the allegations -- >> got to go. >> coming up, philadelphia, you know the city of brotherly love, just announced a ban on feeding homeless. what? the mayor, are you going nutty? next

>> all right. before you fall asleep. that music was kind of slow. we are going to talk about the city of philadelphia and i think a fantastic guy, the mayor, who

we talked about before, he's the mayor there, has been for a long time. i think a very good public servant and when you're in those positions, you have to make tough decisions sometimes and sometimes they aren't always popular. he made one yesterday that was not necessarily popular, but maybe it was a good idea. we're going to talk about it here. he announced there was going to be a ban on feeding homeless in at sites near the benjamin franklin parkway. i'm not familiar with that area, but love parks. >> it's a great place. >> and i have mixed feelings about it, but bob action since you do a lot of work with the homeless and you have for years, i wondered what you thought about it. >> i'm a big fan of nutter and i think he has done good things. but let's face it, it's a little bit of a coincidence that this is being done now, about three months before a very fancy new art museum is being opened there. the barns foundation building,

barns art collection and arts education programs. nobody wants a brand-new $200 million building with a bunch of homeless people out front. the thing that bothers me about this is these people have been feeding these people at these locations for several years. now all of a sudden, it's time to move as the barns building gets opened up. i think -- here in washington, d.c. where i work with the homeless, there is a homeless shelter that does have medical and mental and that is the best possible situation, if you can get it. first of all, they're very unlikely to go indoors, a lot of them don't like it. they don't trust it. they think they'll get arrested or think they'll get beat up. but if you can do it, it's a great idea. i'm a little cynical whether the timing of this is just a little too close. >> let me ask you, eric, there is a homeless advocate in philadelphia. her name is sister mary and she said the mayor is really between a rock and a hard place and she applauded the decision, although i think everyone is cautious about making sure that people

would actually be taken care of. he's said the feedings lack sanitary conditions and dignity and he wants people to be at place where they could get the kind of care bob was talking about. what do you think? >> i guess that would be best, but barring if that's available, which apparently it is not. >> is not, right. >> i don't understand why we're taking food away from the homeless. it's a democratic mayor who all of a sudden is now sounding a lot more, as you point out, like it may have more to do with the $200 million art complex that's within the stone's throw, quote, unquote, from the area -- >> he did say he was going to offer a city building for that. but it's just offering a building doesn't handle -- you got to get doctors volunteering their time, mental health experts -- >> again, once you get government involved, you have to get doctors, you have to get permits, you have to get building. i mean, the poor homeless people are saying, just feed us. give may break! >> a lot of the people that are doing the feeding are from faith-based organizations.

kimberly and greg. based on your experience of working in san francisco, could this have ever been done in san francisco? >> yeah. no. it couldn't. san francisco, we had a very substantial homeless problem. had large drug addicted community. a lot of problems that they had to face. we have tremendous organizations, also faith-based. if you're going to try to prevent people from feeding them, you're going to run into a lot of political trouble. this wasn't an easy position for him to take, but i think it's about the overall infrastructure of the city and kind of containing things in certain areas. >> greg, you've been homeless before. >> yeah, i think that the mayor is doing a great thing by announcing this. i think that just the phrase, outdoor homeless feeding, makes this city sound like a public zoo. thee receipticcally, if you take this to the extreme, why don't you sell bags of peanuts on the corner for people to walk around and they can throw the peanuts at the homeless. i think it's insulting. i think he's doing the right

thing. get these guy noose place where is it's safer. it's a myth that the indoor areas aren't safe. that is a myth. >> it may be a myth. >> i want to add one more thing. his primary job is keeping the citizens of philadelphia safe. where there are large groups of homeless people, it's not safe. he has to make that call. he knows it's going to hurt politically, and he's doing it anyway, so that's brave. >> i don't disagree with you. >> he said for sanitary reasons for the homeless and good food. why is it just now he's understanding this is not an tear when it wasn't, say, 15 years ago when they were doing this? >> he wasn't mayor then. >> or he was a mayor a year and a half ago. >> he's getting around to it. this guy has made brave calls recently. >> he really has. that's why we all like this. >> when he says this, it's easy to say and harder to do and -- >> you're right and you're right and you're right. >> these are all volunteers who do this. it's not government programs. >> philadelphia is in trouble. he's like, it's a cardiac patient and he's trying to get the paddles on it.

>> it's really true. yeah. bring it back to life. >> we'll have to move on. that was a good discussion. we have one coming up which is about native americans and should they be allowed to kill bald eagles for religious reasons? one tribe just got the go ahead. details on that when we come back what makes the sleep number store different? the sleep number bed. the magic of this bed is that you're sleeping on something that conforms to your individual shape. wow! that feels really good. in less than a minute i can get more support. if you change your mind once you get home you can adjust it. so whatever you feel like, the sleep number bed's going to provide it for you. at our semi-annual sleep sale, save $400 to $700 on our most popular bed sets. plus, free standard shipping - but only through march 18th! only at the sleep number store, where queen

mattresses start at just $699

five". ♪ is this the way to amarillo ♪ >> hey, welcome back to "the five".

the arapaho indians every year they have sort of a festival where they use feathers in their -- really religious ceremony and the arapaho indians in wyoming got permission from the u.s. fish and wildlife service to kill two bald eagles for those ceremonies. now, that has raised a ruckus by a lot of people. let's keep this in mind, the bald eagle was on the endangered species list. it was moved to the threatened list and now off. done a magnificent job getting them up -- i got to tell you, i remember a guy who got picked up for -- by a game warden for eaten an egret and he got a $150 ticket and he said, by the way, what does an egret taste like? he said, somewhere between a bald eagle and a spotted owl. environmentalists, don't jump on me. it's a religious service. it is important to them. what do you think?

>> well, one fact, easter is coming up and at the gutfelt household, we make the turkduck eagle, where you take a turkey and put it in a duck and then in an eagle. it's delicious. so i don't have a problem. >> kimberly, can i ask you? >> it was weird. >> it was greg, so it was weird. what do you think? >> look, when i heard this, of course, i have tremendous respect for native american indians. however, it just seems there is a little bit of a difference in how they're being treated. when you hear the catholics are being forced to pay for contraception and other services that are against their religious freedoms and beliefs, but yet it's okay to make an exception to now go ahead and kill the bald eagle who is an endangered species, but to a lot of conservationist efforts we're able to get it removed and now, but they're meeting the federal requirements, i don't know we'll be able to say they can't do it. >> i doubt there is an indian tribe in america who thinks they were not one of the most

oppressed groups in america. >> i think it shows how absurd the endangered species act has become. a very well-intentioned law has been poorly managed and you have things like the gray wolf reintroduced in wyoming. it is now, if you're a rancher and the wolf attacks your livestock, you're not allowed to do anything. so it's just -- i really think at the state level, they could handle this better and that ranchers and others want to be conservationists. however, with this, i'm okay with this. >> how about you? >> i'm not okay with this. it's more than a bird and animal. it's symbol of american freedom. people died for that freedom. protect that thing. i would love to -- do we have a picture of it? >> bald eagle? >> it's beautiful. >> what if it picked up and ate a little dog? >> look at this thing. >> there are some things to think about. the united states government keeps feathers and others from dead bald eagles that have been

picked up. >> they do. claws and everything. >> just look at that animal. how can you -- >> we get it, it's good looking, eric. >> it has elegance. >> i got a question. i agree with you on this point, where is peta? do you think a peta activist will throw paint on a native american? they'll throw it on bob's cowboy boots, but they will not have the guts to do that. >> but that's okay. they were done before the ostrich was -- >> the whales, there's a tribe in alaska called inapt, they are allowed to kill 140 whales a year that they use that they have in their ceremony, but also use it for food and sus tennance. there has precedent for it. >> this is a history that goes back a long way with the arapaho indians who were pushed out by the u.s. army, put on

reservations. i think it's a legitimate -- if that's their -- >> take the eagle? that's not a logical argument. >> it's just threads on a stick, but should you be allowed to burn it? >> no. >> why not? >> before they got here, they were killing them for their ceremony. >> regardless, it's more than a bird. it's more than an endangered bird that came -- >> you want to see a picture? >> they were there with them before we were here. so i think that may have some -- >> only them, but no one else? >> that's the point we're saying. that's a violation of equal protection under the laws and violates other religions. >> you're mad 'cause you can't shoot liberals who are endangered. coming up, my man, greg gusfilled, with thoughts on new

studies about teens going green

>> welcome back to "the five". as st. patrick's day approaches like a pantless leprechaun. an analysis claims today's young americans are less green than their elders. how could this be? weren't they the ones who embraced global warming as scripture and solar and wind power could cure all our ills, including toenail fungus, which is also green? maybe when you get push toad hard by mtv or stupid celebrities or agenda driven teachers, you realize you're being manipulated and that's been the problem. earth freaks demanding total eco logical austerity while they stink up your park. all this indoctrination forcing kids to bow to the god of environmentalism, backfired as they realize their little green legs were being pulled. which leads me back to st. patrick's day. a hoard of irish people walking

in lock step is as close to america -- that's not to say i support the parade. you can't spell leprechaun. if you are planning any parties, i'm available to play a leprechaun. i need to get my outfit cleaned. i had an accident last year and i blame the cabbage. >> i love them. >> that was very good. >> it was. >> leep tree cans in my heart. dana, during the break, you were talking a funny story, and i have heard these stories of includes in classrooms getting indoctrinated into this hype. there is something to something, they get it. >> so my friend's daughter was going to bed one night. she's seven years old, was crying in her bed. he went in said what's wrong? she said, they killed a tree to make my bed! he was devastated because in school they had some enviro come

in and talk about deforestation. but the thing is movements run their course and they serve a good purpose. we talked about the bald eagle which went electric endangered to threatened and is off of that list because of efforts. now that that has sort of into the society, i think people will start supporting things like keystone more because they're not crazy. >> bob, there is a point, too, that being green, being organic is expensive. in this day and age, people just can't afford those alternatives which are i guess less economical. >> let me say the problem with the study, this generation they're talking about are called the millenials. they're now the largest generation in american history, bigger than the baby boomers. these kids are still mostly in college or very early in the work life. it's hard for me to imagine how you can draw conclusions about what they're going to or do do -- one thing we know about them is that they give more community service time than any other generation has.

they don't like political parties for pretty good reasons. they don't like government because they don't like what's going on. >> sounds like libertarians. >> it was our generation, me, who believe in global warming and i still do strongly. but it's not my kids yet. they get taught that, but let's give them time. >> it's not global warming any more. it's climate change? 'cause it's getting cold. >> that's a funny story is that you went to global warming, and then it got cold, and you went, now it's climate change. >> from the beckel almanac. >> that's a fact fact. >> isn't it fact that the green movement could have done better if they didn't overplay their hand? i think that they got very cocky over the last 20, 30 years, after they changed their mind about the coming ice age and

they just got too cocky? >> too aggressive about it, too pushy, putting it down everybody's throat and when some of these theories and ideas that some of these professors were putting forward backfired, then they lost credibility. they were like, whatever. then the light bulbs were forced on us that don't work well and are 60 bucks. that's not helpful. then solyndra and then the volt. where do you want me to stop? and solar power? >> if everybody in america turns out the light bulb -- >> i have a 13-year-old, here is how green he is. if i walk into his room and say, i'm going to have to turn off your tv and the light, he ain't going to be green anymore. >> that's true. >> coming up, we have a winner. the results of my deviled egg challenge next. if you leave now, i'll cook you for breakfast. >> that sounds like hannibal lecter we know a place where tossing and turning

have given way to sleeping. where sleepless nights yield to restful sleep. and lunesta can help you get there, like it has for so many people before. when taking lunesta, don't drive or operate machinery until you feel fully awake. walking, eating, driving, or engaging in other activities while asleep, without remembering it the next day, have been reported. abnormal behaviors may include aggressiveness, agitation,

hallucinations or confusion. in depressed patients, worsening of depression, including risk of suicide, may occur. alcohol may increase these risks. allergic reactions, such as tongue or throat swelling, occur rarely and may be fatal. side effects may include unpleasant taste, headache, dizziness and morning drowsiness. ask your doctor if lunesta is right for you. then get lunesta for $0 at lunesta.com. there's a land of restful sleep. we can help you go there on the wings of lunesta. >> it's time for that special time of the show. you know it. one more thing. we'll start off with this. >> yesterday i started a deviled egg contest among our viewers on twitter and the winner and the loser will both get a copy of my book. the winner is sharon benedict. the key ingredient is the

crumpled bacon. that's what makes her recipe so special. the one who didn't win but still gets a book is linda t. i didn't like this because she had -- i can't read that. she had cheeses in it. the whole point is they have to be a pull bowl of protein. they get a bible unspeakable truths, which is my book, a free book. i'll direct message to you get your information. >> very nice. >> that sounds very good. i'm going to bring up a story that has got a lot of play on fox nation as well, which is yesterday when secretary panetta went to afghanistan, there was some reports about an attack, attempted attack on him, so subsequent to that, the u.s. marines or troops were ordered to disarm themselves. this is in a military zone. a lot of people very upset about that, including myself because i don't think that was a good decision and anybody i talked to in the military agrees to put ourselves in that position and the reasoning behind it was,

well, somebody got itchy and didn't want the afghanys to feel upset or uncomfortable that they weren't able to have their weapons. >> another reason for us to give them a bill and get out. >> ridiculous. >> maybe or maybe not. but certainly don't disarm our own military. >> i agree! >> completely wrong. >> mine is along the lines of military. we appreciate the military very much. we also appreciate our canine friends. look at the pictures here. these are canine military service dogs and what they do is go and sniff out road side bombs and a lot of times they lose their lives, but these dogs are heros as well. guess what? -- >> i knew some guys who try to take care of dogs that were strays, they weren't working dogs. they would take care of the working dog as well as the other afghany dogs that were there. >> my thing, so i got to go to washington, d.c. and i got to speak to the great group this morning, the national ocean

industry association and i thought of you guys last night because on my pillow at the hotel was this thing about clarity. you get a little note and it says, before going to bed, clear your mind by writing down your thoughts and feelings on paper. this exercise is a healthy outlet for letting go of daily pressures and life. i thought that was good advice to pass on. >> i would do it if i could spell. first of all, one more thing, i'm going to say to charlie, our colleague here, i apparently misspoke when i said you only get sources from goldman sachs. he is critical of goldman sachs and he got other source. charlie, i'm sorry. you're a dufus. to my daughter who is home not well today, get better, sweety. you'll be fine by tomorrow and i'm sorry, the producers would not let me use you one more thing. >> blame it on povertier. >> definitely. we ask that you come back and join us on "the five" tomorrow. we look forward to seeing you then. have a