Skip to main content

tv   Dan Wootton Tonight Replay  GB News  January 20, 2023 3:00am-5:01am GMT

3:00 am
n0 spin, no bias , no spin, no bias , censorship. no spin, no bias, censorship. i'm dan wootton. tonight the first covered authorities , ian, first covered authorities, ian, has fallen . the leader of my has fallen. the leader of my nafive has fallen. the leader of my native new zealand jacinda ardern beloved by lockdown zealots around the world here in the uk has called time on her reign of terror. i know what this job takes and i know that i no longer have enough in the tank to do it justice. but will history remember her as the be kind leadership positions herself to be or despot in disguise who brutalised and divided her citizens. it's been a really important principle for me empathy. you even stun and make sure you're cleared or we will keep you in a facility longer than anything but a fond farewell to new zealand's dear
3:01 am
leader cindy, who must be criticised in my day snakes, then i'll get the thoughts of . then i'll get the thoughts of. my then i'll get the thoughts of. my superstar panel. dominique samuels, shaun bayley and amy nicole . should the prints of how nicole. should the prints of how the prince harry before to sign a non—disclosure to attend the coronation and perhaps his wife too while the journalist who proposed the idea angela epstein does battle with historian dr. tessa and top talent agent professor jonathan shalit in the clash at 920. i'll your verdict too. plus have harry and meghan proven the tabloids were right about them all along . one of the about them all along. one of the defining newspaper of a generation, martin clarke . so generation, martin clarke. so he'll explain why an exclusive interview at 1020. and as their popularity slips to a record low in the aftermath of spare, is this the end of harry and meghan's time in the spotlight? my meghan's time in the spotlight? my royal milestones lady colin campbell and phil dampier weigh in at 945, also on show tonight as his comments about nurses
3:02 am
sparked controversy as former cabinet minister simon clarke right, say that no one paid £35,000 to be using a food bank motivated. 1030 is the nation turning a blind eye to the war on? dad, one of the nation's most prominent female politicians, ann widdecombe speaks on this taboo subject at 935. plus, how britain countenance electing a man this desperate to become a world economic forum lap dog . let us economic forum lap dog. let us just ask you quickly , you have just ask you quickly, you have to choose now between , davos or to choose now between, davos or westminster ? davos . i've of westminster? davos. i've of starmer's wef antics and tomorrow's newspaper front pages in the media about ten will have a final gracious person in union jackass named to is dan wootton tonight. let's go . tonight. let's go. i mean is this shock me today
3:03 am
here in the uk specially the bbc and sly news of jacinda ardern stepping down. you genuinely think this was the most popular politician in the world leaving ? her post by choice. but that's not the truth. she was about to be booted from office in a election defeat . and i'm going election defeat. and i'm going to tell you why in a special digest coming up after the news headunes digest coming up after the news headlines with polly middlehurst . dan, thank you and good evening to . you our top story on evening to. you our top story on gb news tonight train companies have increased offer to rmt rail workers including a minimum pay rise of 9% over two years. the rail delivery says that's his best and offer they have in order to prevent more strikes andifs order to prevent more strikes and it's now urging the rmt to put that offer forward to its members for a vote . also the
3:04 am
members for a vote. also the prime minister has been defending his levelling up plans , arguing that the most deprived of the uk will receive most of the government's funds . it the government's funds. it announced that more than £2 billion will be invested over 100 projects across united kingdom. labour though has criticised the plan, saying and the south—east of england will be getting most of the money. but mr. sunak insists that won't be the case. the north is the top region so the amount of money per person there who came to help north, who came second north—east and actually if you look to the other end of the table , find places like london table, find places like london in southeast and the difference is huge . so i think the funding is huge. so i think the funding that you'll per person out of this levelling up fund is twice per capita. what london the southeast is getting and. that should give you guys a confidence that when we talk about delivering, levelling up and spreading opportunity across the we really it.
3:05 am
the country that we really it. now to retired metro politics. police officers have been charged child sex offences as part of an investigation into serving chief inspector who was found dead . 63 year old jack found dead. 63 year old jack addis from perth and 62 year old jeremy laxton from lincolnshire will appear at westminster court on february the ninth. the met says charges follow a lengthy and investigation into richard watkinson , the 49 year old who watkinson, the 49 year old who was found in buckinghamshire last thursday on the day he was also due to be charged . now the also due to be charged. now the actor alec baldwin will be charged with involved tree manslaughter over the fatal shooting on set of . the film shooting on set of. the film rust. the helena hutchins was killed during rehearsals in the us state of new mexico when a prop gun. the baldwin was using fired a live round. mr. baldwin's lawyer has called the ruling a terrible miscarriage of
3:06 am
justice justice. and here the king has requested that profits from a £1 billion a year wind farm deal be used for the wider pubuc farm deal be used for the wider public good rather than the royal family king charles has asked for the from six new offshore wind farms being developed on crown estate land to be redirected to those struggling the most . that comes struggling the most. that comes after his majesty highlighted anxiety and hardship of the cost of living crisis in his christmas message . that's why christmas message. that's why you're up to date on tv , online you're up to date on tv, online and dab+ radio with gb news. back now to dan tonight . back now to dan tonight. the first two covid authoritarian has fallen and good riddance. it is to ardern a shine loving politician who tried to present herself to the
3:07 am
world is the epitome bekind even .dunng world is the epitome bekind even . during her weepy resignation speech overnight when her response to the pandemic was but compassionate , in fact, it was compassionate, in fact, it was downright nasty and heartless as she brainwashed her fellow woke disciples. thanks to a compliant , obsessed with her celebrity status . into embracing a zero status. into embracing a zero covid prison island while illegally locking out million citizens trapped overseas . citizens trapped overseas. she's, no matter how tragic the circumstances, all while demonising unvaccinated. contrast how she wants to present herself as she quit this morning compared the way she governed . being a really governed. being a really important principle for me empathy almost by default. you don't seem like this. two different classes of people. you're vaccinated to work unvaccinated. you have all these rights you vaccinated rights if you are vaccinated thatis rights if you are vaccinated that is it is so. yep yep. do not congregate . don't talk to
3:08 am
not congregate. don't talk to your neighbours . please keep to your neighbours. please keep to your neighbours. please keep to your bubbles you can also trust the director general of health and the ministry of health for that information . otherwise that information. otherwise dismiss else we will to be your single source of truth. if you ask someone of generation what they believe a politician to be and to name some of traits, i doubt they would list kindness . doubt they would list kindness. i doubt that they would list empathy if someone refuses in our facilities to be tested , our facilities to be tested, they have to keep staying so they have to keep staying so they won't be able to leave after 14 days. you either get your tests done and make sure you're cleared or we keep you in a facility longer. this has been the most fulfilling five and a half years of my life. always tried to be kind . i'm going to tried to be kind. i'm going to answer the questions. putting it of the accredited media was also in the uk . i will shut of the accredited media was also in the uk. i will shut down of the accredited media was also in the uk . i will shut down the in the uk. i will shut down the press conference . if you do not press conference. if you do not say all almost i you probably
3:09 am
don't seem like this. two different classes of people who were vaccinated or unvaccinated. you these. if you you have all of these. if you are that is what it are vaccinated that is what it is. so. yep yep . she was crying is. so. yep yep. she was crying , by the way, because this wasn't her choice. i do not was facing a brutal and historic election defeat that would have destroyed her status . a destroyed her status. a globalist darling . kiwis are globalist darling. kiwis are rightly fed with the economic catastrophe that came from 24 day covid isolation periods , day covid isolation periods, crime waves and, immense division that she has inflicted on my beloved country. so yes, i will admit to the end of ardern's regime is deeply personal to me. i refer to the two faced politician actually only half mockingly as dear leader , who must not be leader, who must not be criticised , because when i did criticised, because when i did call out in this game changing column in the mail online, this was in january last year, i was even by new zealand's speaker of , the house, the ardern ally
3:10 am
trevor . by the way , worth trevor. by the way, worth pointing out that a few months later he was forced out of his job because of his inhumane treatment towards anti—allergy and protesters at parliament who he with the sprinkler system. so though i was branded a treat traitor, i actually have no regrets for speaking out about horror of ardern's covid policy , which included a demonic loss where passport holders had apply onune where passport holders had apply online to see whether they would be allowed to return. so that column helped turn the tide in wake new zealanders up to the fact what ardern doing was not normal and so too did the incredible charlotte balance. now she was. she's a brave new zealand journalist and i still can't actually believe this happened.she can't actually believe this happened. she had to see haven from the taliban in afghanistan because she was initially banned from to her birth country to have her baby . the logic here , i
3:11 am
have her baby. the logic here, i hope that that jacinda and ministers take a step back and hang on this just doesn't fit for purpose anymore. and we're putting lot of kiwis abroad through a lot of pain . so it was through a lot of pain. so it was only being shamed in the international media. that prompted ardern to start making changes. remember she had locked the country down for one covid case and changed the insane strategy even when the world realised omicron just a cold sore thousands of folk completely unnecessarily missed being with loved ones as they died from non—covid illnesses while locked up in ardern's prisons, some of which didn't even meet the standard of the united nations convention on the crimes . against new zealand is crimes. against new zealand is only just starting to recover from this madness. i actually was earlier this month and businesses are death amateurs.
3:12 am
one company i know broke out applause when ardern her decision yesterday but society remains starkly divided. the unvaccinated is a rightly still social art that they lost jobs as parramatta x and pharmacists and doctors and police officers and doctors and police officers and even vets simply for exercising right to bodily autonomy . now, i do love my autonomy. now, i do love my birth country. i'm a proud dual citizen of new zealand and the uk is loyal viewers know. but i will not forgive or forget the damage ardern has caused . i hope damage ardern has caused. i hope and pray now new zealand is able to re—embrace important values like , freedom of the press to like, freedom of the press to for bodily autonomy and the right to always return home. now the big kind tyrant is but to respond now my superstar panel, the political commentator dominique samuels , the former dominique samuels, the former conservative london mayoral candidate shaun bailey, and the author and broadcaster amy
3:13 am
nicole . now, dominique, i know nicole. now, dominique, i know for lot of people watching, probably what i've just is very shocking because this watched any of the mainstream here in the uk today they would think that jacinda is making this decision as a virtue signalling act, not because she is actually now largely hated in new zealand because of what she's done to the country. the media is completely in spreading misinformation. actually i'll say about jacinda ardern because the things that she upon her population, which is quite simply and for the media, especially the bbc, to gloss over all of that and act like she was. what the second coming of christ is something i think is absolutely insulting . but, is absolutely insulting. but, you know, it's nice that she resigned. it's nice that the tide turning against her. people like her. but i want see some sort of accountability real accountability. the things that she did to her population and most notably people have lost
3:14 am
their lives as a result of vaccine and lockdown . what she vaccine and lockdown. what she did is cost people lives. will she ever be held accountable ? i she ever be held accountable? i hope so. but you know , i don't hope so. but you know, i don't think so. sure, she won't be held accountable, will she? because the reason that gone now is because she knew that she was going to be in the election coming this year. and she wants to be able to go to a cushy job at the world economic forum , the at the world economic forum, the united nations, that's what this is about there's a masterplan here . i. i is about there's a masterplan here. i. i mean, it is about there's a masterplan here . i. i mean, it does look here. i. i mean, it does look like she stepped out of the way of the political bus because if you look at the numbers in new zealand is not anywhere near as popular . zealand is not anywhere near as popular. she's very unpopular and i think probably in the background, own had said to background, her own had said to her, if we're stand any her, if we're going to stand any chance be without you. so chance we'll be without you. so she probably stepped from those point view. actually you point of view. and actually you can some of the can see in some of the statements which she she a statements which she she a statement she said this a price her unpopularity the price she has pay for keeping people has to pay for keeping people safe. simply isn't . if safe. that simply isn't. if people like they were kept
3:15 am
people felt like they were kept safe, applaud her for safe, that i applaud her for that. that popularity would that. and that popularity would go to any other direction . but go to any other direction. but look, brainwashing so look, brainwashing only last so long spreading because long doesn't spreading because that's what she did. intoxicated the country with a great sense of fear but actually new zealanders aren't stupid . they zealanders aren't stupid. they saw what was happening in the rest the world and eventually they woke up and realised we have been wrongly by government propaganda terrorise lot of people in her position prior prime ministers, mayors, etc. in the world. they were responding each other, sometimes more than they were responding to their own populations . and i think own populations. and i think this is the first result we've seen of that. you know, the population look like they don't want to be around because actually you look at what actually if you look at what people domestic people are saying her domestic record it's non—existent. i spoke to one guy who went on about going to new zealand what she did about that the economic damage has been huge and actually saying her leave actually he was saying her leave he is the best thing that's happened some time which i was quite surprised about. he started by saying
3:16 am
started his statement by saying he crimes out of control he voted crimes out of control poverty and child poverty, which she said was going to abolish is of control. amy are you one of these woke lefties who is obsessed with ardern? i think jacinda ardern's legacy will go beyond zero—covid and we should beyond zero—covid and we should be careful when criticising other nations approaches to covid because those in glass houses our own wasn't exactly spotless either. i would zero—covid over what happened here. this of the game . you look here. this of the game. you look at china now , the absolute at china now, the absolute corruption of partygate that is nothing . so it's probably a new nothing. so it's probably a new zealand as well. when you talk about child poverty, she's child poverty . throughout his time in poverty. throughout his time in office , honesty completely office, honesty completely addressed the housing problems in new zealand . to you you've in new zealand. to you you've reading labour party talking points mean i've just been what were saying is completely
3:17 am
untrue. child poverty is up. there is a housing and businesses are cratering because she locked out immigrants from the country. statistics to you really do counter your anecdotal evidence in this situation . they evidence in this situation. they do. i'll say this if amy is correct and she's the only new dealis correct and she's the only new deal is the only country in the world who weren't affected by a lockdown. you cannot have lockdown, particularly the type in she advocated and not have an economic jacinda ardern announced this zero covid policy. made very clear policy. she made it very clear that this probably have that this would probably have the financial impact as. the same financial impact as. the 2008 crash. she was very transparent throughout about the impact that it would. but the main point think to take from it is that ten times more people per capita died here the uk. surely that's i think that's that's a completely statistic. it is actually a really poor way
3:18 am
to measure things because if you look at countries that didn't institute zero covid mothers like sweden , they actually have like sweden, they actually have the lowest cumulative death tally in the world. and did lockdown. because i think you have to look at excess deaths on the whole. everything they have record breaking what people do in person . look, we are a far in person. look, we are a far larger we have far bigger cities. we have a far older population. you have to take them in international travel and actually jacinda ardern locked down country. but you didn't know this. amy about a week after . boris know this. amy about a week after. boris johnson i think she didn't act particularly , but i didn't act particularly, but i just want to finish on this whole concept of kindness and. she always talks about compassion and be kind. do you think it was compassion ? it when think it was compassion? it when jacinda ardern locked up people who i knew in a government facility as their mother lay dying down the and failed release them from that facility
3:19 am
until the next and kept them locked up for the week . they locked up for the week. they were unable to attend their funeral. no and i'm not saying that jacinda ardern is completely faultless, but i'm that her like she's nasty , that that her like she's nasty, that she's not nasty. average she's efforts have been made has clearly been led by empathy and compassion and that what is empathetic about creating two classes of people in society look at how you can't go and get a haircut can't go to a bar or restaurant if you just don't like the job without injecting with a bit in the moment. she was not working on her as she was not working on her as she was led by a group of scientists, completely by policies to him driven by ideology . and i think something ideology. and i think something that will be remembered by was her response to the christchurch mosque shootings, where she was saying, i saw you save and quickly saw gun legislation which has altered new zealand for the better forever . i mean, for the better forever. i mean, you can show and rally dominique
3:20 am
sam with my cv style panel and are here all night, but this houris are here all night, but this hour is the nation ignoring the war on dads ? one of our most war on dads? one of our most prominent female political figures ann widdecombe . she's figures ann widdecombe. she's very passionate about this. it's a taboo, subject to the media, but she's going to speak at 935. but i'm next in the clash. should prince harry be forced sign a non—disclosure agreement to attend coronation to attend the coronation journalist angela epstein, who came up with this goes head to head with the historian dr. tessa and top talent tessa dunlop and top talent agent professor jonathan shalit . but i want to know what you think. at think. email me down at gbnews.uk. tweet us at news. gbnews.uk. tweet us at gb news. our poll running there to the clash straight the clash straight after the fighting .
3:21 am
3:22 am
3:23 am
3:24 am
time now for . the after time now for. the after viciously trashing almost every blood relative he has in his memoir, spare and deranged media appearances to prince harry. you shouldn't be surprised if king charles battles surrenders vindictive wife from his coronation in may . there's also coronation in may. there's also reportedly genuine and i think, warranted concern from senior royals. the private conversations held around the event end up in harry's next grotesque all. but journalist and royal commentator angela epstein . harry and meghan should epstein. harry and meghan should be welcomed at the coronation. but on the strict condition that the duke of delusion signs a non—disclosure agreement,
3:25 am
writing in a new for the daily express, she said a commitment of contractual not to reveal about the coronation and the arrangements surrounding it is a fair and proportionate response to harry's previous actions . fair and proportionate response to harry's previous actions. but what do you think should harry be forced to sign non—disclosure agreement in order to attend the coronation down at gbnews.uk? tweet me at gb news. you can vote in our poll there too. but first to debate this topic. i'm joined by the aforementioned daily express columnist angela epstein. top talent agent, professor jonathan shalit obe and the author of elizabeth and philip the story of young love, marriage and monarchy. dr. tessa dunlop so angela , i actually dunlop so angela, i actually think this is a really sensible idea of yours. how would it work 7 idea of yours. how would it work ? thank you. well obviously greater legal minds than my would work out where the how would work out where the how would ringfence the event . i would ringfence the event. i suppose the it would just clearly specify as i suppose who works for celebrity to sign a
3:26 am
non—disclosure agreement about the fact they can't reveal the i don't know sting puts halfback cream on his cornflakes or you know kylie minogue likes to have kippers for a tea . the idea kippers for a tea. the idea would be that anything that connotes to connecting with the coronation he cannot talk about and this is not about an argument about free speech. you know, obviously a cornerstone of our constitution and this is not about muzzling a freedom . as about muzzling a freedom. as i said in the express column , said in the express column, harry fired the first salvo, though he has proven that every conversation he's ever had is up for grabs on the public domain that he wants to monetise it. this is a really, really beautiful occasion. i'm a monarchist . you know, charles monarchist. you know, charles has waited a long time . the has waited a long time. the british monarchy goes back to anglo—saxon times. he should be there for all those reasons. and because it's his father. but what worse? and also , what would be worse? and also, can imagine how i would be can you imagine how i would be able amounts able kind of the amounts horsepower he gets out of being denied a seat need really be
3:27 am
able to talk at length about just as charles is crowned. but but the upshot is he shouldn't be allowed on a personal level to in any way trash this coronation. we're going to have heads of state from all corners of the globe coming. people should be able to there enjoy it and not about what harry's take is going be on this is that level of trust and i'm afraid is the only way it has to work. jonathan sallet that seems like a fair point to me. i mean, look, in your entertainment all the time, you're getting folk to sign ndas , so they have the sign ndas, so they have the confidence that actually private can't be used to make money in all the ventures . and actually all the ventures. and actually harry and meghan have proven they will use private conversation agents to further their own nest . i conversation agents to further their own nest. i mean harry even quoted something that king charles said to him at prince philip's funeral in spare. so surely this is a good idea , surely this is a good idea, jonathan. well, i think if
3:28 am
you're playing the gallery, it sounds like a good idea , but i'm sounds like a good idea, but i'm not sure in practise it's a idea or realistic first of all, the coronation is global national pubuc coronation is global national public event . people throughout public event. people throughout the world are going to have opinions. the coronation some people are going to love it. some people are going to hate. some people are going to hate. so i don't see how you can say to prince harry, you can't have an on the when rest an opinion on the when the rest of the world will. i don't think it's having an it's about not having an opinion. i think it's about not sharing private conversations that has with the royals at the coronation or at events that you can say to any child in the world or any followers in the world, you're going to sign a confidentiality contract with your parents about what you can and can't do that happens with celebrities the jonathan celebrities the time jonathan you loads of people you know that loads of people and some your celebrity and i bet some of your celebrity has us that when they date has told us that when they date a you know what it's a new person you know what it's like big celebrity goes on a date with someone and they produce a sign here i'm produce a and say sign here i'm leaving the race. so that happens all the time it does happens all the time it does happen all the time when the
3:29 am
celebrity in the day they go celebrity in the day or they go out be friends or have out to be friends or have professional relationships but not say with their mum and not let's say with their mum and dad and their children . you're dad and their children. you're talking about private conversations to place conversations need to take place between prince harry and meghan and family. they have and their family. they will have to that privately as to to work that out privately as to what can and say. what they can and can't say. okay. time that will okay. and in time that will resolve. the dunlop you resolve. it takes the dunlop you are someone who seems to support what harry and meghan do surely . now if they want to play a part in the coronation they have to be prepared to sign nda because otherwise you know exactly going to happen and edward are both worried about this their conversations end up in the paper about version of spare do you know what i think i'm just going to award myself obe a bit like jonathan's for sitting through first of all, your diatribe against jacinda and kindness and secondly attributing to me the identity of supporting harry and, meghan.
3:30 am
what i try to consistently week after week is shed a little more light and a little less heat on what really starts going out to the question, the patronising tone forgive the slightly patronising tone i'm taking now, but i feel sometimes i have to repeat myself with you and angela if you really want the problem of harry and meghan to away all you have to do is stop talking about it. today would have been a really good example actually posits for all headunes actually posits for all headlines that i think charles wright opines off absolute rubbish because you know they will come to this coronation and they will share private secrets. you would have called me paranoid a few months ago if i'd say that. but what happened in spare? they literally shared a conversation from king charles, words that came from his mouth literally minutes after he buned literally minutes after he buried his own father. so what you're saying is complete rubbish. can you please answer the question should they sign an nda to come to the coronation or
3:31 am
not. hi i'm suggesting, dan, you don't to point at me. i can hear you loud and. clear. thanks to technology, i suggesting that we don't need to discuss this it is totally impractical going to refuse to answer the question . refuse to answer the question. well, you're. you're missing using mis attributing the word because as jonathan is so eloquently explained actually well and in fact more broadly it's very obvious you couldn't prescribe or prevent harry from describing what the entire world was witnessing. but we're talking about that. we're talking about that. we're talking about that. we're talking about the private conversation. actually didn't write about his grandmother's funeral. and you can't seek to adjudicate on private conversations between a father and a son that would just destroy any chance of some kind of domestic . so let me just let of domestic. so let me just let me cut in and ask a question. do you think it was appropriate for him to sue to a newspaper that
3:32 am
decided to share a private letter that had sent to her father, thomas , though, by the father, thomas, though, by the way, she wrote that letter knowing full well it was going to be leaked. she's admitted that. but then harry shared private messages between kate . private messages between kate. and i'm just going to use my hairbrush, pretend it's a microphone so you can hear a little more clearly. i am not an apologist for harry and meghan. i think lots of things they've done are inappropriate and the poll out today you should be if are as you said, genuine royalists you and angela is both william's popularity has by eight points and so too has harry by seven. what harry has done has damaged monarchy. he didn't destroy it. he's damaged it. and i'm suggesting the bomb . we need to increase our monarchy in if we want to solve things. can you still hear me? is actually to talk a bit less. can you listen in response,
3:33 am
please ? and to talk not since please? and to talk not since i mean, that express newspaper , if mean, that express newspaper, if i still boil fat in newspapers , i still boil fat in newspapers, i still boil fat in newspapers, i would line my fire with that article . you're you're better article. you're you're better than that that was literally you you talk about harry monday slicing his head now please you've got to let the people speak is called the clash so people have to be able to respond angela, how do you respond angela, how do you respond to that ? right. well, respond to that? right. well, i absolutely adored testers as a personality is a lovely person really is . but in terms of her really is. but in terms of her opinion , certainly the last opinion, certainly the last patronising remark i have to robustly disagree with. let me ask you is a matter of love. you look at the legal structure of this excuse me , i'm going to this excuse me, i'm going to cough when things are in public domain. this is a free for all. of course, everybody can comment about it if i see david beckham sitting in the middle , the high sitting in the middle, the high street, having a bag of chips without any attempt to disguise who is, then i can comment on who he is, then i can comment on i can take a picture of him. whatever little kids. but
3:34 am
obviously i can. we're not talking about the that's going to be there on the public to be out there on the public domain. we're talking about the fact harry say, oh, fact that harry could say, oh, william's was shiny as in william's car was shiny as in mine or that when meghan got there there was make up there and there was a make up lady and kate got first ups with the blusher brush or whatever it is and what i fear and testing you should appreciate this is as a historian is that want this we want this globally significant. sarah to be you know beauty , a sarah to be you know beauty, a fantasy. i mean we just want to bnng fantasy. i mean we just want to bring jonathan shepherd. no, very good point, angela. i hear you loud and i just want to bnng you loud and i just want to bring jonathan charlotte in quickly to wrap up. jonathan obviously you spend career obviously you spend your career here at public figures here looking at public figures and some time saving their careers or actually work it out that it's time for them to call it a day. now, taste that. just the interesting point that she thinks. sure. harry and meghan are damaged but damage been caused to william and kate to buy this book. do you agree with
3:35 am
that, jonathan? come out worse . that, jonathan? come out worse. i don't think anybody's come out of it well, but i think we should contact allies it. i think it's a brisk storm and storms move on. this is not going to damage the royal family in the long run. it's a spat. it's a public spat. the whole excited about it . the dogs bark, excited about it. the dogs bark, the cow that moves on. what i would say to anybody when they talk about ndas contracts only have a contract and an nda if you can action if prince harry and meghan were to talk about something william or king charles said king charles or prince william, i'm not going to sue and meghan for saying something them which wouldn't be practical . so the point of an practical. so the point of an nda is completely pointless nda. it the public happier. it makes the public happier. look, i personally still think it's a very good idea put forward by the daily express columnist and royal commentator angela epstein . but thank you to angela epstein. but thank you to two chairman of india talent rights leading rights and london's leading agent, professor jonathan charlotte obe and royal author
3:36 am
dr. tessa dunlop . who do you dr. tessa dunlop. who do you agree with? should prince harry be forced to sign a non—disclosure agreement in order to handy? i think that should be the condition on which he is allowed to attend. harry has made it clear to his family that he cannot be trusted rich and says no. he should sign a non attendance agreement. richard up well up for that, to be honest. and david, he shouldn't be invited to the coronation at all. his comments have turned him into a walking security risk. he can stay in california and watch it on. tv and your verdict is now in. 83% of you agree with this idea from angela that harry should be made to sign a non—disclosure agreement to attend the coronation. seven 18% of you say he shouldn't . now, coronation. seven 18% of you say he shouldn't. now, coming as he shouldn't. now, coming up, as we just their popularity has plummeted to a record low in a bombshell new poll. so is this end of harry and meghan's time in the spotlight my royal masterminds lady colin campbell and phil dampier. coming up this houn and phil dampier. coming up this hour. first, is the nation hour. but first, is the nation turning blind to the on turning a blind to the war on dads ? well, one of our most
3:37 am
dads? well, one of our most prominent female politicians ann widdecombe , is going to speak widdecombe, is going to speak out on this taboo straight after the .
3:38 am
3:39 am
3:40 am
break time for big style. and after years of fighting for equality in society, are the scales tipping the other way? with now
3:41 am
becoming second class citizens, former conservative minister and willie kim thinks , arguing that willie kim thinks, arguing that fathers in particular have been let down by the various authorities meant to protect them . so recommending a book on them. so recommending a book on one man's struggle to see his children. it's called the war on dads vincent mcgovern and says it's men who are now the persecuted sex and. we only need to look at male suicide rates and female employment quotas for proof of that. now add in the rest of the media you know full well is a pretty much taboo subject but you passionately believe in this issue . why is it believe in this issue. why is it so important to and what do we need to know ? well, it's need to know? well, it's important because it's the interests of both fathers and children that men are treated equally . children that men are treated equally. it's children that men are treated equally . it's also, of course , equally. it's also, of course, are lots of other areas in which men currently suffer . if men currently suffer. if somebody makes an allegation , a somebody makes an allegation, a man, he's immediate. the image they referred to as a
3:42 am
perpetrator and the complainant is referred to as a victim, as if the issue is being decided when it hasn't even been investigated. men suffer from positive discrimination . there positive discrimination. there are parliamentary seats they can't apply for because it's all women. short list . there are women. short list. there are boards have , quotas and all the boards have, quotas and all the rest. but in a whole variety of wise men suffer. but this particular booklet i is about men trying to get access to their own children. now courts , their own children. now courts, nearly always. not always , but nearly always. not always, but nearly always. not always, but nearly always. not always, but nearly always avoid access them. avoid. sorry custody for the mother . and avoid. sorry custody for the mother. and that i understand. but at the time they award access to the father . but all access to the father. but all they can do is what should happen. you don't enforce what does happen. and what does happenis does happen. and what does happen is that where the break up is an amicable . the woman can up is an amicable. the woman can simply frustrate the man's access to the court says this
3:43 am
guy to see his children every other weekend and sure will find numerous ways of assuring that. he doesn't see his children. some them will actually make false allegations in order to try and separate the men from their children. and, of course , their children. and, of course, it's not just the men who suffer , it's the children. because children need fathers justice. they their mothers, a father isn't an optional extra . a isn't an optional extra. a father is vital to child's growing up . and i think one of growing up. and i think one of the problems is an that dads who end up that situation feel like often they're not being listened to usually give up. what is different about the man in this book vincent mcgovern, is that he did not give up. he fought system all the way through. he got various rulings in his from the ombudsman. he actually one change in the law. he fought the system the whole way . but in system the whole way. but in doing so i mean he almost
3:44 am
beggared himself in order to do it. and he also i mean there was obviously the enormous emotional strain on both him and the children. so it a real lesson in what is going wrong and will get to grips it. there was a brief penod to grips it. there was a brief period when fathers for justice were very active and they were shaking up buckingham palace and all this sort of thing and making a huge splash. and people said, oh , this about. we'll be said, oh, this about. we'll be getting take an interest but i'm it's something that just nobody gives any priority priority to is all about women women women . is all about women women women. so what's the solution . and i so what's the solution. and i mean, does there have to be for example, i minister for men in in government. i should there be lobby groups that may be considered extreme as fathers for justice. because i think the forjustice. because i think the problem is and a bit like a just a boiler an extinction rebellion they actually ended up turning
3:45 am
all a lot of folk with their more dramatic stance shall we say . yeah, i think they did turn say. yeah, i think they did turn off a lot of people. but it's also true that if they hadn't done those things one or two things, i really disagreed with, if i hadn't done them, they wouldn't have got any recognition. the fact that pools at you asked me what . the at all. you asked me what. the solution is now it's not a minister for men. i believe in a minister for men. i believe in a minister for men. i believe in a minister for women. i think what is a nonsense? we're all equal. we're to what? we're supposed to be what? i would like to see is effective actions in the pool . so if would like to see is effective actions in the pool. so if a woman denies access in defiance of a court order because the courts will award access unless the man is dangerous , they will the man is dangerous, they will award access and. if the woman then frustrates access, she should have to pay for that and she should be made to do unpaid community work while the man sees children. that would seem to stop someone . good practical to stop someone. good practical solution . and i like it. thank solution. and i like it. thank you so . big
3:46 am
solution. and i like it. thank you so. big woody solution. and i like it. thank you so . big woody style back you so. big woody style back next week. but coming up, have the tories create yet more division with their proposed on banning trans conversion therapy, a move that was criminalised in parental conversations about gender. i'll bnng conversations about gender. i'll bring you that hot topic in the first of 2 hours. newspapers the media buzz at ten. but first, as their popularity to a record low in the aftermath of harry's memoir, spare is this the end of harry and time in the limelight. my harry and time in the limelight. my royal mail size lady colin and phil dampier, the straight after the .
3:47 am
3:48 am
3:49 am
break time now for our royal masterminds, lady colin campbell and phil damp. masterminds, lady colin campbell and phil damp . and despite and phil damp. and despite previously enjoying even greater popularity in the us compared to the uk, harry meghan's latest anfics the uk, harry meghan's latest antics have seen crash to record
3:50 am
. so a bombshell for the meghan supporting publication newsweek has seen harry drop 45 points among the us public and the duchess 36 points in just over a month . the survey of 2000 month. the survey of 2000 americans was made just after harry's tell all memoir hit shelves worldwide . meghan is now shelves worldwide. meghan is now the least royal in the us ahead of and the queen consort . so wow of and the queen consort. so wow c has spare. and the netflix docu series actually ended up being a mass of own go for harry and meghan . oh absolutely but and meghan. oh absolutely but isn't wonderful. you i'd say jamaicans would say spit in the sky it falls in your eye. i think it's splendid , you know, think it's splendid, you know, that they were thinking they were going to roll everybody's corks. all the way to the bank
3:51 am
covered, covering themselves in glory in gold. and it's turned . glory in gold. and it's turned. they've covered themselves something else which we go into films . you agree ? yes. we won't films. you agree? yes. we won't go into that. and i don't say good evening. i mean, the bombs burst, hasn't it? i mean, i think even young in america are starting to sort of latch onto that and realise that there are one draconian young people. we've boredom we've got a pretty boredom threshold days and i think threshold these days and i think they're actually getting bored with pose a very with them. so these pose a very significant i think we know that their plummeted their popularity has plummeted on but for it do on this side. but for it to do so on the atlantic on the other side atlantic as well. my side of the atlantic as well. my worry that they realise this worry is that they realise this and try to sort get back into the royal family the back the royal family via, the back doon the royal family via, the back door, try and work in door, perhaps try and do work in the and that is a the commonwealth. and that is a bit worry. end up bit of a worry. we'll end up with situation where they're with a situation where they're in and half out, which of course is the queen trying is what the queen trying to avoid. so i do fear that king charles his foot charles does to put his foot down. might try down. otherwise they might try and in. well, aides and sleep back in. well, aides say that is a genuine concern,
3:52 am
isn't it? especially seem that seem lot of people seem to be a lot of people around, king charles, who want him have of him to have some sort of reconceive elevation meeting with before the with harry and meghan before the coronation issue. well shall i tell you i'm not entirely convinced that's not just a fig leaf to cover the fact that really the king and the prince of wales i'm just and what they're dealing with is and simply are trying do it in as decorous way as possible to avoid a backlash from harry and meghan's support orders or create support . harry meghan's support orders or create support. harry and meghan, we're going to i actually do not think that . oh, actually do not think that. oh, now i understand is that that's charles and william are a lot less gullible and a lot malleable . and remember, harry malleable. and remember, harry is the one who has flown the
3:53 am
kinds of you we'll do some work, possibly in the commonwealth. i mean, i have to tell you, i know various high commonwealth commissioners, they don't want harry anywhere near them after. the trouble he's posed with those lies about racism , the those lies about racism, the royal family, because caused no end of problems in their countries and they want harry and nathan anywhere near them. but this is harry and meghan yet again proposing something they hope will get them in half out . hope will get them in half out. i don't think it's going to happen. well better not happen now. look harry slammed jeremy clarkson as a misogynist this week . a column on meghan . clarkson as a misogynist this week . a column on meghan. but i week. a column on meghan. but i wanted to play you both his own barrage of attacks on women and his new book. listen to this . his new book. listen to this. unlike the other matrons, pat wasn't what i was called . i was wasn't what i was called. i was small. walking was hard. stairs were torture. she descend backwards, glacially . often we
3:54 am
backwards, glacially. often we stand on the learning below her doing antic dances and making faces . tony to see which boy did faces. tony to see which boy did this with the most enthusiasm. we went mocking her as she came down the stairs . who the hell is down the stairs. who the hell is this, ed ? loathsome toad. i this, ed? loathsome toad. i gathered everyone who knew her was in full agreement that she was in full agreement that she was an posture on the of humanity . excuse for humanity. excuse for a journalist . humanity. excuse for a journalist. i mean lady c pot kettle . i think harry is pretty kettle. i think harry is pretty cocky. you might say. oh, pretty hypocritical to criticise coxon given the way that he speaks about women. well you know jeremy clarkson actually was not being misogynist. he was making an allusion to a popular series called of thrones. so put that in its correct content . well, in its correct content. well, harry, that's he was young at the time , but i have to tell the time, but i have to tell you, i i've been around children
3:55 am
all my life. some children, all crew and others aren't. you there is no way that any child. i would regard as desirable be mocking some a matron who had school illnesses. also what is so insensitive about , school illnesses. also what is so insensitive about, pound's comment is that cousin eugenie had scoliosis and you know, so, you know , it's cuts very close you know, it's cuts very close to the bone and it shows that harry really has no control over his mouth or indeed being decent person. i it's outrageous he is abusive harry is very abusive. i think there's any way that you can compare clarkson's allusion to game of . it was kara kennedy to game of. it was kara kennedy thing you should have mentioned that it was an allusion he didn't . but that's an omission . didn't. but that's an omission. harry has add admissions are they are admission of somebody
3:56 am
who is cruel and unfeeling . and who is cruel and unfeeling. and i'm afraid you don't develop feelings as you get older. born with a heart or without what that's value chain called . i that's value chain called. i mean you to admit there is a real hypocrisy for harry to constantly talk about compassion and.the constantly talk about compassion and. the fact that his life's work is all about being kind when the book is just full of bio and attacks on people who he like . it's hypocrisy, isn't it? like. it's hypocrisy, isn't it? just with the racist and he was the racist. now he's done . it's the racist. now he's done. it's horrible. it's foreign language. what i don't like is the way he his for people he doesn't actually name people he just refers to by these horrible names. it's sort of school bullying stuff as i'm this sad little man. phil i'm this sad little man. phil i'm this sad little man. phil i'm this sad little man . yeah . oh, i have little man. yeah. oh, i have quite a few other journalists are. and it's, it's just very
3:57 am
very unpleasant and shows are really straight that he's got, i'm afraid . yeah. i personally i'm afraid. yeah. i personally i it's a compliment because if harry likes you're usually a pretty bad person. that's what i've worked out over the past few years, i look fascinating analysis as ever. lady colin campbell and phil dampier, top royal authors and our royal masterminds , they're back next masterminds, they're back next week. but coming up, have the sussexes proven that the tap boys were right about them from start? well, one of the defining newspaper editors of a generation, martin clarke, thinks so. he's going to explain why in an exclusive interview at 1020. but first, have the tories risk yet more division with their u—turn on banning conversion therapy moves that risk parental conversations about gender. my superstar debate that and will deliver the first of tomorrow's newspapers in the media buzz we're back in just 2 minutes time.
3:58 am
3:59 am
4:00 am
to it's 10 pm. i'm dan watson tonight after , putting on tonight after, putting on a unhed tonight after, putting on a united front to stare nicola sturgeon's dangerous reform bill this week does the proposed tory u—turn on banning trans conversion risk dividing the party. again i debate that move which critical mps say could criminalise parental conversations about gender. with my superstar panel next. tonight i'm joined by dominique samuels shaun bailey and amy nicole . shaun bailey and amy nicole. also coming up, has prince fantasy few men fuelled memoir proved the tabloids were always right about him and meghan. well one of the uk's most prominent editors during their time in the royal family, martin clarke speaks out on the sussexes assault on britain's free press . you won't want to miss that exclusive interview at 1020 as
4:01 am
the jeremy clarkson for all right proven that humour is dead . and how can he save his career being torched by the rabid sausage squad man of the people, charlie lawson. his no nonsense take at 1045. plus, the whole world is talking about clarkson . but has he got some rare support from his neighbours ? or support from his neighbours? or just accept the apology ? be on just accept the apology? be on your way. but he shouldn't lose job. no more of that coming up in the media buzz. and as his comments about nurses sparked controversy . is former cabinet controversy. is former cabinet minister clarke right to say that? no paid minister clarke right to say that? no pai d £35,000 should be that? no paid £35,000 should be using a food bank? that's a big debate. then well. plus, slippery summer exposes his true colours as he rubbed shoulders with globalist elites. the world economic forum. and let us just ask you quickly , you have to ask you quickly, you have to choose now between , davos or choose now between, davos or westminster . davos well, you can westminster. davos well, you can stay may. as far as i'm concerned , tomorrow's newspapers concerned, tomorrow's newspapers
4:02 am
and the graysons person union. jack has coming up to offer first the news the polly middlehurst middlehurst. first the news the polly middlehurst middlehurst . dan, middlehurst middlehurst. dan, thank you. good evening . the top thank you. good evening. the top story on gb news train have increased their offer to rmt rail workers . a minimum pay rise rail workers. a minimum pay rise of 9% over two years. the rail delivery group says is the best and final they have in order to prevent strikes. it's now urging the rmt to put the offer forward its members for a vote . its members for a vote. lancashire police is reportedly looking into a video of rishi sunak not wearing a seat belt while working in a moving car. video shows the prime minister not using the safety device while filming a social media. he has apologised with his spokesman saying he made an error of judgement in the uk . error of judgement in the uk. the offence can be punished with fines of up to £500. today the
4:03 am
prime minister has been defending his levelling up plans, arguing most deprived areas will receive most funds and announced more than areas will receive most funds and announced more tha n £2 and announced more than £2 billion will be invested in over 100 projects across the uk . 100 projects across the uk. laboun 100 projects across the uk. labour, though, has criticised the plan, saying london and the south—east will be getting most of the money. but mr. sunak insists that won't be the case. the north is the top region , so the north is the top region, so the amount of money per person that who came to help north west, who came second north—east and actually if you look to the other end of the table , find other end of the table, find places like london in southeast. and the difference is . so and the difference is. so i think the funding that all getting per person out of levelling up fund is twice per capha levelling up fund is twice per capita what london the southeast is getting and that should give you guys a confidence that when we talk about delivering levelling up and spreading opportunity across the country that mean that rishi that we really mean that rishi sunak now to return fired
4:04 am
metropolitan police officers have been charged with child offences as part of an investigation into a service . investigation into a service. met chief inspector who's been found dead . 63 year old jack found dead. 63 year old jack addis from perthshire and 62 year old jeremy laxton . year old jeremy laxton. lincolnshire will appear at magistrates court in westminster on february the ninth. the met says the charges follow a lengthy and complex investigation into richard , the investigation into richard, the 49 year old who was found dead in buckinghamshire last thursday on the day. he was also due to be charged . and finally, be charged. and finally, britain's andy murray fought back from two sets down at the australian open tonight after the longest tennis match of his career . he defeated the longest tennis match of his career. he defeated tennis cook kokkinakis in second round where the contest lasting 5 hours and 45 minutes. it's all that's the second latest finish for a match in australian open history. the
4:05 am
epic showdown ending at 4:00 in the morning. five past. to be precise . that's it from . me. precise. that's it from. me. you're up to date on tv online and radio. back now to dan wootton tonight . wootton tonight. time for tomorrow's news now and our mediabuzz have just been handed the first front pages, lee anderson isn't around, so the guardian hasn't been out yet tonight. let's have a look . it tonight. let's have a look. it it reports the tory constituencies been allocated significantly more money than others from the government's significantly more money than others from the government' s £4 others from the government's £4 billion levelling up fund. the metro leads with public anger that sunak has taken that pm rishi sunak has taken private flights to destinations close like blackpool, close to london. like blackpool, his have defended his team have defended the journey, wouldn't be journey, saying it wouldn't be practical on him. the practical to travel on him. the tory unreliable. coast tory is unreliable. west coast train and the star has splashed on the story of a bus driver. elvis tribute act aiming for a
4:06 am
number one single rank . nick number one single rank. nick good on him. i see. we saw a panel back because me now political commentator dominic saville's former conservative london mayoral candidate bailey and author and broadcaster and the author and broadcaster amy . now, on tuesday, amy nicholl. now, on tuesday, the government led by scottish secretary alister jack up to scheming sturgeon and dangerous gender recognition reform bill. however, among the common benches, a select group of tories are lobbying the party collective to the protection of women's rights and vulnerable teens. this conflict is centred around the proposed on trans conversion therapy, which pro trans considered with mp alisha kearns, an ally of penny mordaunt, has to the forefront of the government's agenda . of the government's agenda. however, dozens of backbenchers are said to be opposed to the ban unless it includes safeguards protect parents. that view was echoed by the equalities minister kemi badenoch, who wrote to all tory mps, insisting that parents not
4:07 am
be criminalised for having legitimate conversations with their children about whether they really want to change genden they really want to change gender. so dominic samuels , it gender. so dominic samuels, it feels like this is one step forward and two steps backwards in terms of the protection of women, but a space, in this case, vulnerable teenagers. yeah, and because we have some very severely people within the conservative party that seem stop talking about sean like that delusional, delusional. they're actually dangerous . they're actually dangerous. actually the things that they're saying basically suggesting the medical profession , girls and medical profession, girls and parents should be criminalised just a that maybe there are other routes that you can take as a young person that don't include legally changing agenda plumping yourself with hormone blockers . and i'm not saying blockers. and i'm not saying that music is not the only in the conservative party right now. it's those who understand what's going on and those who want to conflate the issue with
4:08 am
toilets and changing are completely interconnected. and this is the problem. then like you in your fairy world, people that take advantage of the system don't exist . this problem system don't exist. this problem has arisen from a scotland and changes to the gender recognition bill. all of the safeguards that we seek to protect women, to protect women spaces, whether that's in prisons toilets, schools , we'll prisons toilets, schools, we'll vote it down. and the reason that was that they didn't want the narrative to be that trans people are criminals. not what we're saying. we're saying the people exist that take advantage of the system and we've seen the use the label trans to access women's spaces to fulfil their own sex sexual fantasies and women should be respect id protected totally decent. you've misunderstood exactly the doj and agenda recognition initiative really is all is to do with your birth certificate. when's the last time you your best effort to exploit it. so
4:09 am
let's get at some dots because you seem to be able to do that if have if you are able to legally change your gender change your birth certificate, that means by law you have to be treated exactly the same as a biological woman. that means you can have access to female spaces like prisons like toilets, like like prisons like toilets, like like rewind like sports was handled very promptly in the 2010 equalities act. the changing argument, the women's spaces argument, changing argument, the women's spaces argument , that's not spaces argument, that's not happening anymore. that's not what this about what we saw on which side of the party you are. what seems to happen here, there's a number of mp that were concerned about would women's spaces be protected, would put people who are not adults or have that their gender physically altered and that's they think to do with that is frustration is nothing to do with because this is about being recognised this is about says about me it's about men it's about me it's about men it's about paperwork it's about taking that final step when you already have a gender, you already have a gender, you
4:10 am
already have a passport that says you're a woman. that's a driving licence. only thing it affects is your birth certificate, which basically affects is your birth certificiwhen hich basically affects is your birth certificiwhen can basically affects is your birth certificiwhen can getically affects is your birth certificiwhen can get married and affects when can get married and what says . don't say no what it says. don't say no because . that's what is you, because. that's what is you, amy. what amy's forgetting is two things are the law. firstly it's the step. what is the it's the first step. what is the next that was already in next step? that was already in to break it. employees were concerned about the second pieces as well . second piece is pieces as well. second piece is well, once you are identified as a woman, it means organisations can't keep women's spaces clear because what we're talking about here, we are talking what trans people want. that's but also what do women want? women want that some other way . i that situation some other way. i need to be protected. please, amy, let me finish. what conservative ps were really concerned about is the to women's spaces and also which i think is the reasoning point and piece you cannot criminalise parents for having conversations their children. when you have a child you are legally responsible for the welfare that child so how can you talk of this big change and you evolve to look within? because amy, i
4:11 am
mean, think we focus in on mean, i think if we focus in on on the gender, which is yeah which is which is what you're particularly concerned about do you not understand that for young people example care about who has been on this show i've spoken to who sued the tavistock clinic and then appeal risk. spoken to who sued the tavistock clinic and then appeal risk . yes clinic and then appeal risk. yes but the tavistock clinic is now closed. the conservative government decided it's dangerous. but let pass the point and then you can respond . point and then you can respond. we need more. let me regional centre. let me finish the point and then you can respond. so for someone karabo was so someone like karabo she was so young when she started it. life changing , life changing, medical changing, life changing, medical to transition her from a woman to transition her from a woman to a man. now what she realised and this is by the way, for many many people who want to transition young, what she realised is that actually this was about sexuality, it wasn't about she should never have had
4:12 am
these life changing treatments which have completely destroyed her physically because you can't reverse impact. and the issue is i mean now under this law potentially people in her life counsellors , medical counsellors, medical professionals maybe even her parents would be banned from having conversations with her about that's at all what would happen and i'm not trying to invalidate experience of detransition is there completely valid experiences just? like there are people who regrets over abortions? that's how we make our laws about we make the laws based on the majority experience . and that's what's experience. and that's what's happened here in the cass report. i tend to be most trans changing so with the cases detransition or healthcare that wasn't correctly applied or like you said, it can get confused with sexuality. that's that's how, how finish this point. that is all true . that's why gender is all true. that's why gender identity identity clinics need to be rolled out and more
4:13 am
available because they deal explain and i'm one of the main things i took from reading the cass report in full is that that at that stage it's that quick access the health care which differentiates between those struggling with their sexuality and those who are genuinely trans but you also still do the travesty yeah but but the bill the bill the main street professionals on having that conversation so i know i would have missed the point and deeper thing here you made the point that we don't make our laws on the on the on the reality of one or two people. well, actually, there's a much larger of there's a much larger group of people, women, 51% of the population who are nowhere be seen this bill. and what i, seen in this bill. and what i, the conservative mp was saying was just need to stop pause was, we just need to stop pause so that we can make sure that women spaces are conservative. have been looking at this since 2017. the work of mp like elizabeth kearns is a brilliant example of what happens . you example of what happens. you thoroughly look at this and you understand is no understand it and there is no way you could go against. i way that you could go against. i mean, i have to say, i think
4:14 am
it's quite archbishop. think it's quite archbishop. i think it's quite archbishop. i think it's when the it's quite patronising when the left say because disagree left say because we disagree with you we think we're so we don't understand the point . it's don't understand the point. it's not. that is what you're saying country if we disagree with you we're so sorry we must not under the point we understand the point we just no the point because we three of you sit here and not know the grc actually is so yeah i do get you're ignorance all you've got later today you've all your time . oh today you've all your time. oh sorry. when you can legally change your gender when you are legally recognised on a bus another sex it's not just about the birth certificate, it's about how the law responds to it, which means legally you have be treated as the tainted you're saying am to i genuine needs to be banned because you're not understanding it. so that's why six in ten we have had these in place since you are talking about equalities act gave transgender women the access to
4:15 am
all the space to make it legally to make it easier to find a way show up so i know we're sorry sorry how can you do it here? am i stupid? how can you allow on? how she's asked . she's asked a how she's asked. she's asked a question. why stupid ? yes, but question. why stupid? yes, but you also said that we didn't understand you placing . you're understand you placing. you're all three of you facing it with you. it's nothing to do with. we don't. we should throw personal insults around at all. but you did say that if we just misunderstood . we've misunderstood. we've misunderstood. we've misunderstood and i've missed chances. if you're if you're related what she are saying you think about i'm going to see i'll see a gender recognition certificate but i've already explained it i've explained it so.the explained it i've explained it so. the gender recognition certificate means you certificate means that you can legally your on your legally change your sex on your birth certificate, right? without of gender without a diagnosis of gender dysphoria, which is something that government agreed that theresa government agreed to even be removed . to even be removed. medicalisation you did it. then you live as a gay man. you are 93v- you live as a gay man. you are gay. does that have to be medicalised now? but that's not something. and if you don't
4:16 am
understand a real difference between , sexuality and gender between, sexuality and gender identity, then i actually feel it's, you know what i'm saying? and they have say something about the point the point that amy is misunderstood is that the gender card issue, bill, lowers all of this to the age of 16. and the point that dominique is trying to make the law in england to respond to you differently , you are legally a differently, you are legally a woman. and the worry is you then have access to surgery and. so what do you do? you already do. how were you when you how old were you when you realised your gender? was born realised your gender? i was born the i am. oh, that's funny, the way i am. oh, that's funny, because matches exactly because that matches exactly experiences think i think experiences that i think i think missing the point between . missing the point between. gender identity and biological sex and we just like we agree on one thing that we do need to take the heat out of this debate because increasingly toxic people. how we when we people. it's just how we when we speak to fairly good speak to them fairly good challenge tonight . look let's challenge tonight. look let's move because the older you move on because the older you get our forums annual summit has coaxed mob elite , the coaxed a mob of the elite, the swiss resort of davos week,
4:17 am
swiss ski resort of davos week, including mainstream media barons , bigwigs, government barons, bigwigs, government leaders and slippery starmer and the leader of the opposition has even admitted today that he prefers the globalist in davos to life . brits in westminster to life. brits in westminster watch . let us just ask you watch. let us just ask you quickly. you have to choose now , davos or westminster ? davos. , davos or westminster? davos. why because westminster is to and you know, it's closed and we're having meaning once you get out of westminster whether it's anywhere else, you actually engage with people that you couldn't see working with in the future . westminster is a tribal future. westminster is a tribal shouting place okay, you stay there. you stay there . you enjoy there. you stay there. you enjoy your time with the globalist said in davos some also had the cheek to have a dig at rishi for not ditching the country to be a wef lapdog. look, i think if you
4:18 am
prefer schmoozing in switzerland doing real work in westminster , doing real work in westminster, then it's a real worry that you want to be our next prime minister. i don't think mr. has his power . minister. i don't think mr. has his power. he's right. i'm account. shaun bailey. dominique samuels, stand by because coming up is former cabinet minister simon clark right to say nobody earning simon clark right to say nobody earnin g £35,000 needs to resort earning £35,000 needs to resort to food banks. my soup stuff panel returned for that media the sequel at 1030. but first have the revelations in spare proof the british tabloids right about him and meghan all along fleet street heavyweights . fleet street heavyweights. former newspaper editor martin clarke has his say. he's live with me straight after the .
4:19 am
4:20 am
4:21 am
4:22 am
break now, the liberal media have fawned over prince attacks on the british press and his to control the headlines. but one of the most overlooked aspect of the revelations in spare is that the revelations in spare is that the dictator of sussex admits on multiple that newspaper reports him that were by the way denied at the time were actually correct . for example, the press correct. for example, the press was right about repeated drug use, which started as a teenager, and reporters like myself were on the money. when we wrote about the tensions between the fab four plus meghan markle , this alleged of markle, this alleged bullying of palace still being asserted by
4:23 am
people involved despite attempts to muddy the waters well, after an astonishing eight year career in journalism , my next guest is in journalism, my next guest is ideally placed to respond to the prince's smear campaign. martin is one of britain's most prominent editors, having edited the daily record the scotsman, and launched the hugely successful mail online . and i'm successful mail online. and i'm delighted to say that he joins me now. so, martin, obviously, harry is launching this attack on the british press and he effectively is now admitting that he wants to police and change the british press , which change the british press, which he views as the devil . and we'll he views as the devil. and we'll come to that in a moment. but in all of his attacks on the british press, as you point out actually perhaps the thing that is most overlooked is fact, that time and again , he reveals that time and again, he reveals that stories that were denied publicly at the time were actually true . yeah. and you actually true. yeah. and you gave that some of the best
4:24 am
examples yourself. and you're the man who was the expert on that because you wrote those stories and they were certainly denied the time. yes and you know, there's a wonderful in the book where in the run up to the sort of the famous don't qualify it with him, with william, where he accuses when william's accusing of you accusing of being, you know, a bully troublemaker and bully and a troublemaker and upsetting and says, upsetting everybody and says, oh, we'll just you'll just you'll just parroting, know, you'll just parroting, you know, the read in the press. the stuff you read in the press. sorry that is so backward . it sorry that is so backward. it boggles the mind, because obviously william was was there. william saw it firsthand or heard firsthand accounts from people involved. and yet harry's blaming press. and this is the real contradiction at the centre of the book, because on the one hand, harry, you know, hates the press. we're big bogeyman in press. we're the big bogeyman in the of his entire existence the eyes of his entire existence views life. but equally views entire life. but equally he at the same time is attacking you know, william , camilla for you know, william, camilla for leaking stories about him that doesn't deny. he doesn't deny these stories. true. so he can't have it both ways. the press
4:25 am
can't. on the one hand, make people make things up. and then at the same time, all they're doing printing that his doing is printing stuff that his own family, he claims, are leaking about him. own family, he claims, are leakwith about him. own family, he claims, are leakwith the about him. own family, he claims, are leakwith the william out him. own family, he claims, are leakwith the william case,m. own family, he claims, are leakwith the william case, by and with the william case, by the way, i think that's a really personal example , because what personal example, because what he failed to mention is that actually william had made his own judgement about . actually william had made his own judgement about. meghan, before a single was published in british press about any disagreements between the four of them because actually for a long time fooled us, right? it wasn't until november 2018 when i actually wrote the first story that said and i remember very clearly, kate and meghan had fallen out over the way that meghan was treating staff members at kensington. but members at kensington. yeah, but it that actually. how it turns out that actually. how did never hates it, never did he never hates it, never hates it, never hit it off in the first place. and when you look some of stuff look back at some of the stuff that we and printed, it's that we wrote and printed, it's kind of embarrassed were kind of embarrassed that we were we then so, so, so we were full then so, so, so comprehensively know, they comprehensively. you know, they were the fab four were talking about the fab four and i guess was like, and it was, i guess was like, you know, it was more like the
4:26 am
beside behind the scenes of let it then, you know, a hard it be then, you know, a hard day's or something like day's night or something like that. it it was that. it was it was all it was all. and this is what i think people don't understand. the press work really press is the press work really hard the times. but the hard the times. but even the especially the tabloid work really things right. really hard to get things right. not because weren't about not because we weren't about necessarily worried necessarily we're a bit worried about and having to about getting sued and having to pay a about getting sued and having to pay a lot of money. but because getting wrong is really getting really wrong is really embarrassing. find embarrassing. when you find out a years or even ten a year or two years or even ten years down the line that what you was nonsense, that you wrote was nonsense, that fabulous stuff. yeah, it was pure were pure propaganda and. they were never fab fool briefed, the never a fab fool briefed, by the way , by royal press officers way, by royal press officers working for harry and meghan, even though he seems to hate this briefing so much. but what i think actually more important here, martin, though, is actually his chilling bid to censor us. now this is actually very serious . and usually folk very serious. and usually folk on the left and the woke karate who love harry and meghan would be deeply concerned about a highly privileged individual born into the british royal
4:27 am
family, a multi millionaire trying to control all what is published , the free press. but published, the free press. but because it's harry and meghan, actually a lot of people are embracing this push it liberals don't mind the press being control so long as they're not controlling the liberal press and the liberal can do what they want. and this is why if it was just some royal crank, you know, on a hobbyhorse about the press who . yeah, but the trouble is who. yeah, but the trouble is harry is pushing a very open door here. it's you mentioned davos and in your segment about starmer and this week the wef they've been to davos they've been talking about health disinformation is you know a grave threat to democracy and the liberal west they don't seem to care . the loss of free speech to care. the loss of free speech being a threat to democracy. and this is a you in in america we've had over the last couple of years we've had the most american newspapers ignoring the hunter laptop, which was labelled as russian
4:28 am
disinformation . and that's been disinformation. and that's been totally true. you suppressed by social media in this in this country and america, you know, you had people hounded their jobs for saying the wrong things about about about the trans issue and about covid. and, you know, this is one of this and disinformation is one of harry's favourite words. but, you know, one with one month's disinformation is next month's the truth. and of the lab leak theory being a great example , theory being a great example, perfect example or some of the side effects to this this. so this is why, you know, harry, just tarring the press as irresponsible and wrong most of the time is not only factually incorrect it's really really dangerous . what about the woke dangerous. what about the woke hollywood corporations seem to be absolutely enthralled by harry and meghan. i mean we've seen this week jeremy clarkson and i don't know what think specifically about his column personally look i thought probably it wasn't a wise
4:29 am
column. it was a misunderstood joke relating to game of thrones. and probably we know now. no, he's admitted it was a mistake, all make mistake, but we all make mistakes. he's written 5000 columns, made what's columns, right? i've made what's fascinating to me. he's a big star. martin right. he's a big star. martin right. he's a big star. he's been a money—maker , star. he's been a money—maker, itv. he's relaunched. who wants be a millionaire, which was completely dead as a format. but because it's harry and meghan who have complained about him and they are such royalty in hollywood, it really does look like is on the verge of cancelling mainstream . it's cancelling mainstream. it's deeply alarming since he's , you deeply alarming since he's, you know, admit his mistake but that's not enough harry and meghan they don't just wanting to admit that mistake. they want to admit that mistake. they want to admit that everything he writes is misogynistic, misogynistic hateful you misogynistic and hateful you know, i don't know, they'll be happy he he happy until, you know, he he ends up in a gutter somewhere and he's like , you say, harry and he's like, you say, harry and he's like, you say, harry and meghan, harry and meghan are riding a riding high. and meghan, harry and meghan are riding a riding high . well, riding a riding high. well, we'll see how long that with the woke corporations if you know
4:30 am
their popularity continues to decline obviously the book's been a massive seller the netflix interviews were massively so you know that's two wins. but, you know how much longer can they keep this up i mean how much more dirty washing have they got to wash and that they're prepared wash? but isn't they're prepared wash? but isn't the damage done by clarkson thing and i'll explain because look obviously were a brave look obviously you were a brave editor but most editors and most broadcasters most most tv presenters, right . they just presenters, right. they just want to stay in a job and so why now would any of them take the risk of doing either original journalism that criticises harry and meghan in some ways or commentary about harry and meghan when you think that there is a realistic threat that your bosses won't stand by you if harry and meghan complain. yes. and you know, for most editors , and you know, for most editors, the equipment that it is in television, you've got to when it comes to column, you've got it comes to a column, you've got roles. one is to protect them from themselves. sometimes and say, shouldn't that. say, no, you shouldn't that. yeah. and they may sometimes push and there'll an argument
4:31 am
push and there'll be an argument and but at least you've, you've told them. look think this is told them. look i think this is a silly idea and at the end a very silly idea and at the end of day, you can, you can of the day, you can, you can actually say, well, i'm not going to print that. other going to print that. the other thing, the duty you owe thing, the other duty you owe them have back when them is to have their back when it does all pear shaped and yes. and some of his bosses seem to be , to be exact , and some of his bosses seem to be , to be exact, standing up be, to be not exact, standing up for and that that for him. and that is that frightening because if a big beast like clarkson , you know, beast like clarkson, you know, and they don't come much bigger or, brilliant. quite frankly, it they have everything else he's done then you know who else who is safe. yes, you're quite right. well, no one. no know if clarkson can be cancelled the clarkson can be cancelled at the behest harry and meghan. anyone can be captain . and i think can be captain. and i think what's so shocking this, what's so shocking about this, and obviously why i very and this is obviously why i very much believe the importance much believe in the importance freedom channel like freedom of speech channel like gb that actually tv gb news is that actually tv presenters these jobs they are all having conversations on their whatsapp groups that are no longer to prepared share with their viewers or their readers and to me that censorship is
4:32 am
actually becoming so overwhelming in so many parts. what's really sad is it's not just it's not just it's not just now to broadcasters , writers. now to broadcasters, writers. that's how it is in real life. yeah, there are there are things that will say on whatsapp to their nearest and dearest and their nearest and dearest and their closest friends that they wouldn't dare say in the office, not because it's particularly it was deep, it's deeply offensive a year or two ago, it would have been perfectly unremarkable that day, now it's just keep this day, but now it's just keep this safe, keep your mouth shut. okay. so wrap up, how the okay. so to wrap up, how do the royal family and the british press , how should they fight press, how should they fight back against harry and meghan's attacks ? it's one thing i'd like attacks? it's one thing i'd like to say is if you read the book and i have the book, god help me me, too. and it is you do end up at the end feeling very sad that everybody, including harry, you know, the man is has not had a happy life. he's not happy not happy life. he's not happy not happy his own and come, happy in his own skin. and come, you and particularly with you know, and particularly with the tragic loss of his mother, you can't but feel sorry for him
4:33 am
and, you know, i genuinely hope he does find happiness in he does find some happiness in montecito new life. montecito with his new life. i think you equally feel heartbroken for the royal family, although think know, family, although think you know, when see harry when you when you see harry ended and you do wonder over ended up and you do wonder over and over did no one see where this, you know, this lad was going? mean, forbid , the going? i mean, god forbid, the worst ever happened in worst that ever happened in despair actually had to step despair of actually had to step as the was he remotely as the air was he remotely suhed as the air was he remotely suited for that either intellectually in temperament. i don't it so you know the royal family have got their questions to answer. i mean i guess if he has got material for another book, then maybe the family will offer him a way back or some of reconciliation if out of nothing but fear. but then can they? because how could you have him at dinner and it would be they'd be like one of the people i just talked about what's happening each under the table, each other under the table, saying things did saying the things that they did saying the things that they did say of harry and meghan say in front of harry and meghan in cancelled for in case they got cancelled for it. know, it's an impossible it. you know, it's an impossible situation. it isn't impossible situation. it isn't impossible situation. martin klopp, so great you. thank you. my
4:34 am
great to have you. thank you. my pleasure. coming jeremy pleasure. but coming up, jeremy clarkson, discussed, clarkson, as we just discussed, is cancellation while is facing cancellation while chelsea pace dodge jail chelsea stop oil pace dodge jail time. on earth that fair time. how on earth is that fair 7 time. how on earth is that fair ? another and i'm ? it's another workweek and i'm out people former corrie out of the people former corrie star charlie will try and star charlie lawson will try and make sense of it all at 1045. but first this former cabinet minister simon clarke , under minister simon clarke, under fire insisting the of fire for insisting the salary of £35,000 should be enough to avoid the bank. is he right? my soupis avoid the bank. is he right? my soup is our debate that when the media tens after the .
4:35 am
4:36 am
4:37 am
break let's return to tomorrow's newsnight now and i'll mediabuzz more front pages now the i report that eu leaders want starmer's to become british pm. no kidding , starmer's to become british pm. no kidding, no kidding . cause he no kidding, no kidding. cause he wants us back in the eu . of wants us back in the eu. of course they want him back . oh, course they want him back. oh, it's like a no sugar sort of story. the sun's no one is above
4:38 am
the law that's following today's that hollywood's act. a hollywood actor, alec baldwin, will be charged with involuntary manslaughter over a fatal shooting on film set in 2021. and the daily mirror reports a met police chief and two retired officers have been accused of being involved in a ring with a serving chief inspector found dead on the day , was charged dead on the day, was charged with child sex offences by superstar fallon. back with me now, political commentator samuels, the former conservative london mayoral candidate shaun bailey , and the author and bailey, and the author and broadcaster amy, now tory mp simon clarke has today doubled down on comments suggesting , down on comments suggesting, sending down on comments suggesting, sendin g £35,000 a year. the sending £35,000 a year. the approximate average annual salary of nurses who still rely on foodbanks and mishandling their money while the former levelling up secretary tweeted he has, quote, huge respect for pubuc he has, quote, huge respect for public sector workers. he stood by local radio appearance by a local radio appearance yesterday told yesterday in which he told struggling people earning the sandwiches about struggling people earning the sandwiches abou more sandwiches about £7,000 more than average annual salary. than the average annual salary. quote, something is wrong with
4:39 am
your budgeting , pat cullen? you your budgeting, pat cullen? you know , on the royal college of know, on the royal college of nursing, obviously, she happy she called the comments disgusting, heartless and dangerously of touch. nearly one in five nurses who come on the starting salary of around £27,000 who are newly qualified, claim have used a food. in claim to have used a food. in a survey published in october, clark michael also clark successor michael also weighed in on the outlook. i know what . the individual know what. the individual concerned was trying to say. i'm know that he's a very good hearted and generous minded person. but i think in the phraseology the wrong message came across. but kellogg has found support in the shape of fellow tory mp and friend of our lee anderson after declaring knew of constituents who earn less but , are knew of constituents who earn less but, are able to budget well be well enough to be self—sufficient. lee tweeted a photo staff member, katie, photo of a staff member, katie, who has twitter gleefully mocked his in debt and on less his single in debt and on less than his single in debt and on less tha claiming made his than £30,000, claiming made his point well she does point really well as she does not rely on food banks is actually able to save and shaun bailey this is where i just lose
4:40 am
plot with media because to me it's actually a very uncontroversial point to say that if you are making uncontroversial point to say that if you are makin g £35,000 that if you are making £35,000 a yean that if you are making £35,000 a year , £7,000 above the average year, £7,000 above the average wage, you've either got a gambling problem, a drug problem , alcohol problem, or a budgeting . if you have to use budgeting. if you have to use food banks. because look i say this is someone who was earning £16,000, you know, in first journalism job, it was inflation actually surprising long time ago and i know it was tough to survive it. it's possible to survive. look, the problem in this climate , people who are this climate, people who are earning fairly good money struggling what the conversation is actually it's put it into into stark relief and thus is above average national salaries if they're on food that means at least 50, probably more of people should be in food banks. so people earn less will start
4:41 am
to ask themselves slightly different questions. but £35,000, right? that . different questions. but £35,000, right? that . £7,000 £35,000, right? that. £7,000 above our average salary for the full time . yeah. dominique. full time. yeah. dominique. dominique, that's before tax. but dominic, seriously if you're earning but dominic, seriously if you're earnin g £35,000 and unless you earning £35,000 and unless you have the problems that i just mentioned big alcohol problem , mentioned big alcohol problem, big drug big gambling big drug problems, big gambling problems should able to problems, you should be able to survive without a food bank. and that's all. simon clarke was saying. actually, i think saying. and actually, i think simon simon clarke simon with budgets simon clarke was talking crop and the reason why he was talking crop is because because you need to factor in inflation that his government is responsible for now this inflation in fact food pnces now this inflation in fact food prices in fact affects mortgage pncesit prices in fact affects mortgage prices it affects childcare costs, energy prices that is major chunk of someone's wages. then you've got to factor in you've got to let me just list 5000. let me just list it you've got to factor in income tax , got to factor in income tax, national insurance. so when you calculate with a tax code
4:42 am
analysis to halve , that's analysis to halve, that's £27,800 a year, which is about £2,300 a month. then you've got to take in consideration council tax rises and the fact that they actually have to increase contributions to their pension . contributions to their pension. so when you factor in, you see food, but when you have to when you factor in all of these things and factor in fact, that these costs are rising, it's not it's not crazy to suggest that a nurse who has a mortgage and the mortgage payments are increasing as children . and when you factor as children. and when you factor in all these costs, it doesn't help that much. laughs so may have to supplement the fridge with a with food banks don't think that's a crazy suggestion but it's also not crazy in my opinion amy to be talking to people about budgeting why are we so easily offended actually lots of people do not know how to budget do not know how to use your money and actually it's really that we start talking about this because. this problem isn't away . i think we're isn't going away. i think we're about two separate things yet .
4:43 am
about two separate things yet. there is definitely an argument for some financial education. i think that would be a good. yeah, i agree thing add into the curriculum th e £35,000 is above curriculum the £35,000 is above what most people in this country is that most people in this country are using food. but i think that that almost makes it makes point even better that an above average wage currently is not enough to deal with the of living. if you believe the survey i would argue it is big big responsibility of this government and it makes it even more ironic the same simon and he'd rather blame frittering personal responses . i think i personal responses. i think i was trying was i think that's also really shortsighted and final word shaking his head making all kinds political points. and that's where this a rubbish debate he was talking about what people need to survive in this country and he was merely making a as people are make more we have are less who make more we have to a conversation about to have a conversation about what it may well what we pay people. it may well be they paid more, but the
4:44 am
be that they paid more, but the fact that we have this conversation, we've been a political that is a problem . political on that is a problem. i because , you i completely agree because, you know, i've been saying for weeks and weeks and weeks nurses need to paid more teachers need to to be paid more teachers need to be more. we have to be be paid more. we also have to be incredibly careful these incredibly careful with these pubuc incredibly careful with these public hikes that we public sector hikes that we don't cause this inflation we. what we will be really happy to call inflation by creating fake money and all of a sudden we need to know how much. i spoke out against that. so it's a whole other topic. but i do believe i do believe that we to start talking about the need for people at the moment especially to be careful with how they spend the money to get after it. let's current climate relativism as well of course got to talk about who gets paid and why and the important now look, finally the important now look, finally the whole world talking about the whole world is talking about jeremy. what do his jeremy. but what do his neighbours role with neighbours think? his role with the local sarah's home the sussexes local sarah's home in oxfordshire have at loggerheads with the tv most about recent over the about in recent months over the surging popularity of his diddly squat shop restaurant. but squat farm shop restaurant. but
4:45 am
our producer ben leo went our senior producer ben leo went to found out if they had any sympathy for clarkson's latest , sympathy for clarkson's latest, a showdown with cancel culture . a showdown with cancel culture. do you think harry and meghan should have accepted his apology ? two apologies. in fact, they should definitely put all the lies and everything she's told. clarkson is been , shall we say clarkson is been, shall we say rude? oh, i think he generally i mean he's put chillington on the map as well. we know but i've never heard a champion turn until he went as i think he has said things like too often and he clearly says things to be controversial. i'm not a big fan of being cancelled should of people being cancelled should he loses itv and amazon job over it is that fair is cancel culture the way we should go. we live in a blame society don't we. everybody's blaming everybody because i think who wants a millionaire was . wants to be a millionaire was. it's been a better show since even there i never thought anybody better. kris anybody could be better. kris durham just accept the durham i would just accept the apology. you'll be on your. but he lose his job. no .
4:46 am
he shouldn't lose his job. no. jeremy might not be here, but his milk machine's working. it's the cow juice vending machine where you can get a litre of milk fo r £1.20 . so once milk for £1.20. so once clarkson's neighbours are supporting him, he will be very coming up . strap in for greatest coming up. strap in for greatest breaks in and jackass where we'll debate whether rishi sunak's seatbelt gas is worthy of a police investigation . let of a police investigation. let me tell you right now , not but me tell you right now, not but also on the way , has the also on the way, has the clarkson foray proven how it is to make a joke out of the people like corrie star charlie lawson joins me straight after the break. that and more as he breaks down a very woke week .
4:47 am
4:48 am
4:49 am
time now for an cancer ward and this is where britain's top commentators speak out on controversial issues without . controversial issues without. the fear of the cancel culture sweeping rest of the media. clearly, the sackings of piers morgan and sharon osbourne back in enough for harry in 2021 weren't enough for harry and vengeful and meghan because vengeful couple target couple have another target in their after slammed their sights after they slammed jeremy clarkson's well—meaning apology. media storm apology. the media storm surrounding the clarkson's farm and who wants to be a millionaire presenter is gathering and gathering speed with amazon and itv reportedly considering itv reportedly, considering cancelling broadcasting at cancelling the broadcasting at the of the sussexes to the behest of the sussexes to look at the woke week . the behest of the sussexes to look at the woke week. i'm joined tonight by our man of, the people, charlie lawson . the people, charlie lawson. charlie, is clarkson going be cancelled . well, i think, given cancelled. well, i think, given the current climate , you're not the current climate, you're not you're probably right. unfortunately these companies although be massive and what have you they will bow to the minority pressure groups . minority pressure groups. they're very vocal and they're
4:50 am
very good. they're very good at being noisy, if you see what i mean. of course, he shouldn't be for god's sake. jeremy. is. is jeremy , you know, i mean, this jeremy, you know, i mean, this is the man who piers morgan, for god's , you know, so , you know, god's, you know, so, you know, he says what he does for if he knows what he's doing. so in this case, i have to say, i did read this and know i've been around many blocks and even i sort of hold steady here. jerry sloan . but look what what i know sloan. but look what what i know monitors make of the man and all but he did have the good to apology to apologise a very fulsome apology and it should be but as we've said before , harry but as we've said before, harry and meghan are making themselves and meghan are making themselves and i wish they'd just shut up, honour their contracts , and just honour their contracts, and just be quiet. i mean to that. now, charlie, speaking to people, i should just shut up. rabid egos. it's just top oil. unfortunately, back in headlines after one of their dim—witted
4:51 am
members managed to avoid jail yesterday. this is alfred beswick who disrupted the lives hardworking brits when he climbed up an m 25 gantry back in november, the 26 year old pleaded with the judge the stunt had ruined his and had ruined his life and relationship the judge relationship and the judge bought it. charlie's there despite putting lives at risk, beswick was given a suspended sentence and, avoided any jail time. that's wrong, isn't it? yes, of course. it's i mean, look done. i wouldn't be saying the police can pre—empt these things, although they're perfectly capable of doing so . perfectly capable of doing so. they're very good intelligence. but i don't think we need another law for it. what we do needis another law for it. what we do need is when these people are caught and prosecuted. charged and prosecuted , whether an and prosecuted, whether an offence is that they're punished. i don't do some swingeing barely to open up gantry for you know whatever it was held up the drop . he was held up the drop. he deserves a bit of a life at the very least. he deserves some community service or whatever,
4:52 am
you know. but i look, i don't know whether it was crime court or magistrates court, but you magistrates have got a bit of previous on this. but what are we going to do with these people? i mean , there's a guy on people? i mean, there's a guy on there was a on twitter the other day and, he was being interviewed in a shopping centre or something and he started on it wasn't stopping oil, but it was stopping something else that were killing the planet or something. he just stood. something. and he just stood. there is a final now . i mean, there is a final now. i mean, girl , i don't there is a final now. i mean, girl, i don't know there is a final now. i mean, girl , i don't know what you know girl, i don't know what you know . it's ludicrous. these people . . it's ludicrous. these people. it's ludicrous. charlie look, one thing that shocked me, this bruce announcing he's leaving the bbc, but is this to do with ageism. well, vanessa fouts, who's also left radio two, thinks . watch. i imagine that thinks. watch. i imagine that it's a feeling of some sense of ageism , the bbc, that once you ageism, the bbc, that once you get over a certain age, your days are numbered . you're not days are numbered. you're not valued in the same way . the
4:53 am
valued in the same way. the music isn't as appealing because. they've kind of changed the music of radio to appeal to the music of radio to appeal to the younger. they're so desperate get . did you get my desperate to get. did you get my future? do you get a sense of this ageism? yes. yes i did. now, ageism behind it. i think she's right charlie lawson. do you ? yes, i do . whoever is in you? yes, i do. whoever is in charge quite city or whoever else , they, you know, it to a else, they, you know, it to a lesser extent. but someone is making some bum decisions here. you what? i mean? i mean, you know, listen, paddy mcguinness would be a man of mine but i think even he looking the figures when they got rid of sue an established church so to speak, and poor old paddy has been handed this sort of poison challenge chalice and he's doing his best. but you're who the bbc tried to appeal so nobody watches them under the age of under my generation in any way for god's sake. you know what i mean that was running company. it needs a good boot the because they can't to fit i mean i'm
4:54 am
actually just your legends back your legions which is why we back you lawson. thank you so much. and we will speak next week, but it's time now to reveal today's greatest personal duty, a jackass , dominique , duty, a jackass, dominique, who's gb nominee mine is oscar for climbing the height of mount everest to help raise money to help children at a local hospice to have holidays . shaun bailey to have holidays. shaun bailey you want a mini my is mp kemi badenoch for making sure that any changes the gender laws don't criminal rise parents parents must be allowed to look and look after their own children . but we're not going to children. but we're not going to have another fight about it. i mean the camilla tominey mine is katie gomery who perhaps unlike me, calmly describes and unpacks trans issues , particularly in trans issues, particularly in relation to the great reforms. well, i'm going to go i'm going go see kemi badenoch as the person on this. but you and jack
4:55 am
has time now dominique your nominee mines jacinda for nominee mines jacinda ardern for being psycho tyrant should bayley mines is sadiq khan for misleading londoners about his ulez expansion. oh let's have a look at this . the conservatives look at this. the conservatives clearly do not care about our children developing terminally stunted lungs . you are saying stunted lungs. you are saying not cash best that my sadly my best are in the chair and you make comments through me that a despicable comment just second of all the time is always to tell people what we think. you are trying to cover his own tracks because he lied to londoners. if only you were in that role. you came so close. i mean, call your nominee. it's sunak for dimon's saying that laws are just us little people . laws are just us little people. it's a seatbelt. is this what you've got to explain? he was caught on a video notoriously about the police outside. they're investigating how. ludicrous. they must have more important things to do . they important things to do. they must have got caught not wearing
4:56 am
a seatbelt. we would not get away with . we've watched digest away with. we've watched digest at the start of the show, though you will understand that, of course , tonight's union jack has course, tonight's union jack has is jacinda ardern , the be kind is jacinda ardern, the be kind tyrant . you know what i say, tyrant. you know what i say, sandy. bye please don't come back since dominic samuel, shaun bailey, amy d—calif. that was a very spicy show to end the week, but i enjoyed it thank you so much i am of course back monday night from 9 pm. have a wonderful weekend. thank you for your company. headline is next. goodnight .
4:57 am
4:58 am
4:59 am
5:00 am
good evening. you're with gb news and in a moment headliners. but first let's catch up on the latest news and the top story tonight . latest news and the top story tonight. train companies have increased their offer to rmt rail workers a minimum pay rise of 9% over two years. the rail delivery group says that's its best and final offer they have in to prevent more strikes . now in to prevent more strikes. now urging the rmt to put the offer forward to its members for vote . lancashire police is reportedly looking into the video of rishi sunak not wearing a seatbelt while in a moving car . video shows the prime minister not using the safety device while filming a social media

68 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on