hello. good afternoon . welcome. hello. good afternoon. welcome. surprise, surprise. it's me, nana. acquire michelle in dewbs & co now coming up in the show after messing up the processing of asylum seekers by basically not processing them, creating a backlog in the tens of thousands with a wait in the region of 18 months and with a 95% approval rate. to be honest , we might months and with a 95% approval rate. to be honest, we might as well just let everyone through. well, i'm joking. but it seems that isn't, in fact, a joke because the government are doing just this new fast just that with this new fast track a sort of asylum track plan. a sort of asylum seeker amnesty of some 12,000 claims. is this really the way

forward .7 then is the keir forward? then is the keir starmer's labour party becoming the party of government? here is this you? this follows missions taxing wealthy business, clean energy, blah blah blah. is this all you talk? the devil is in the detail and well, there is no detail. i'll be asking whether a four day week could be the shape of things to come . after 56 of of things to come. after 56 of the 61 companies who trialled it hailed it a success. but is this really practical? surely if you knew you were taking part in this trial, you'd make it look like a good idea to get it implemented. i know i would. and is this skewed to white collar desktop jobs and really for desktop jobs and not really for jobs where you need to get your hands dirty? then finally, after the ngozi fulani debacle , you'll the ngozi fulani debacle, you'll be pleased to hear that lady susan hussey has returned to royal duties and about time to were the palace right to reinstate her? well, you know my opinion on that one. all that's on the way tonight in dewbs & co on the way tonight in dewbs& co with me. but first, let's get your latest news headlines .

your latest news headlines. well, that's a bit of past sex. i married armstrong in the gb newsroom. three men have been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder following the shooting of a high ranking officer in omagh. detective chief inspector john caldwell was targeted by two masked gunmen while he was with his son at a sports centre last night. he's a critical but stable he's in a critical but stable condition in hospital. police say the dissident group, the new ira the primary focus and ira is the primary focus and their reviewing the threat level. chief constable simon byrne told reporters a respected colleague is fighting for his life. clearly as an organisation we are utterly shocked and angered by last night's brazen and calculated attack . john is a and calculated attack. john is a father, husband and colleague and a valued and active member of his local community. john's colleagues are understandably extremely distressed by last night's shooting. however, they

remain resolute and committed to bringing those responsible for this heinous crime to justice. well, baroness snowdon alone, a former police ombudsman for northern ireland, told gb news this will bring back disturbing memories of the past. the shooting of mr. caldwell is something except one, although, and it seems it seems to be connected with the fact that he's a police officer and that means that every police officer who got up this morning and put their uniform on will reflect it. every police officer going out to work will have reflected , what does this mean to me and their children and their spouses and parents, the siblings, and their parents, the siblings, everyone will be saying what's going on? the number of asylum seekers waiting for an initial decision on their claim has hit 160,000, the highest level since records began. the home secretary has told gb news in an exclusive interview that nothing has been ruled out when it comes to tackling illegal immigration. more than 45,000 people across the channel in small boats last yean the channel in small boats last year, suella braverman describes

that as unacceptable and says she understands the frustration over hotels being used as temporary accommodation. it's clear that we have an unsustainable situation in towns and cities around our country whereby because of the overwhelming numbers of people arriving here illegally and our legal duties to accommodate them , we are now having to house them in hotels and that is causing understandable tensions within communities. pressures on local resources . and you can local resources. and you can watch the full interview with the home secretary on the gb news youtube channel. sir keir starmer outlined his vision for the country . if labour were to the country. if labour were to win the next general election. launching his party's five national missions , the labour national missions, the labour leader says the uk needs to be more competitive. the economy was highlighted as a top priority and he promised to be tough on crime . sir keir says tough on crime. sir keir says sticking plaster politics is holding everyone back . the holding everyone back. the pattern is always the same .

pattern is always the same. distracted by the short term obsessions that fixate westminster held back by a sinister system which uses low trusted politics as an excuse to narrow our ambitions. blinkered to the potential of an active government setting the direction we look from crisis to crisis . we look from crisis to crisis. always reacting. always behind the curve. a sticking plaster. never a cure . four people have never a cure. four people have been arrested after a huge ukrainian flag was painted outside the russian embassy in london. the country's colours were spread across 500 square metres of the road, with hundreds of litres of yellow and blue paint . a protest group led blue paint. a protest group led by donkeys has claimed responsibility, saying the flag marks the first anniversary of russia's invasion of . ukraine russia's invasion of. ukraine glowing tributes have been paid to the legendary football commentator john motson, whose died at age of 77. gary

died at the age of 77. gary lineker has described him as england's voice of football for generations . known as motty , he generations. known as motty, he became synonymous with the beautiful game and the sheepskin coat during a distinguished 50 year career with the bbc , during year career with the bbc, during which he covered ten world cups, ten european championships and 29 fa cup finals. before retiring from the bbc in 2018 . retiring from the bbc in 2018. and the queen consort has appeared to speak out against censorship of roald dahl literature as she launched a book project in london earlier , book project in london earlier, made her first appearance since recovering from covid to launch the charity, which is aimed at bringing people together who share a love of reading. please keep doing so and please remain true. jill calling unimpeded by those who may wish to kerb the freedom of your expression or impose limits on your

imagination . tv online and dab+ imagination. tv online and dab+ radio . this is gb news now it is radio. this is gb news now it is back to nana . back to nana. good afternoon is faster , good afternoon is faster, approaching 8 minutes after 6:00. welcome to jeeves and co with me. not a quitter. i'm with you till seven now. my panel joining me this evening is james schneider. he's the co—founder of momentum and also an adviser to jeremy corbyn. also martin daubney , a journalist and former daubney, a journalist and former brexit party mep . right. so i brexit party mep. right. so i want to know your thoughts about throughout the programme. you can get in touch with the gb views at gb news don't uk one tweet me at gb news. now our first story was one of rishi sunak's big promises for this yeah sunak's big promises for this year. you remember that he said he would eliminate the backlog of asylum requests, has of asylum requests, which has just record high of just hit a record high of 166,000. but how is he going to

do that? well, for 12,000 asylum seekers, it will mean not bothering with a face to face interview. instead, the cases will be handled by a questionnaire. yeah the home office says it will apply for refugee from afghanistan, syria , eritrea, libya and yemen . so , eritrea, libya and yemen. so is doesn't amount to simply wave people through bolton is this basically an amnesty because that's kind of what i'm calling it. i think it's beyond that. i think that's an act now of national self—harm . and we've national self—harm. and we've gone beyond being a laughing stock to being situation . where stock to being situation. where 90% of people who arrive to our shores are undocumented . they shores are undocumented. they literally don't have a passport. we don't know who they are. there's no way of ascertaining who they are. and the notion that they can get british citizenship without that interview, well, i can work in a chip shop without face to face interview and let we're doling out citizenship like this is i think , ridiculous and it's worse think, ridiculous and it's worse than that. it's an experiment where the safety of women and girls is becoming a by product.

we're seeing all over the country. we saw knowsley the incidence of sexual harassment which led to protest . incidence of sexual harassment which led to protest. i'm speaking to a mother in dover tomorrow. that was a case of a girl, an alleged raped by four afghani boys in a school, a 15 year old girl. and the girls have been on strike this week. they're too afraid to go to school now. nobody's saying that. everybody arriving here as a violent criminal. but must a violent criminal. but we must accept that somehow. if accept that somehow. and if that's it's a wading that's the case, it's a wading through without even face to through without even a face to face interview , without them face interview, without them having documentation attached time. we know that isis is time. but we know that isis is chucking 30,000 people out of prison in syria . strikes me as prison in syria. strikes me as absolute insanity. but what difference does it make? i mean, we let 95% of the people in anyway. what's the point, james? it's not an if it's only it's not an amnesty if it's only for 12,000. well, an amnesty for 12,000 people. this is what they have answer some questions. have to answer some questions. and so and then they they don't get the question. there they go. they through one step they don't go through one step of process. my understand of the process. my understand thing asylum thing of it is that asylum seekers these countries is

seekers from these countries is because the you know, because they're the you know, the most war torn and destroyed countries on have a very countries on earth have a very high rate of acceptance. so this isn't what you would want to happen. but the starting point is there's a huge backlog because as the home office has been run down, they haven't been processing cases ten years ago, almost 100% of cases were dealt with in six months. that's what they're meant to be now. it's nearly 0. so the real problem is that the real pm is putting more resources in so on. now this might be a sensible thing. it might be a sensible thing. it might not be a sensible thing. it depends on the details of the questions and who it's not. but you know, firstly, they're not going be given yet. going to be given citizens yet. this is about processing asylum cases. granting cases. it's about granting somebody status of a of somebody the status of a of asylum of a refugee , which means asylum of a refugee, which means that they are not dependent on the state, that they can work, they can pay back into the system . but their claim funds system. but their claim funds the it but the point these people would be here. so whether

they their status changes from waiting to be processed or processed the person is still here. so the idea that through in an interview that's going to stop that from happening . no, no stop that from happening. no, no no that's not that's i don't think we're going there. the point is, if you do, that won't it act as a magnet for others from these countries, think, well, it's just going to fast track in won't that track people in won't that be the case? well, so what do you think it will be? so i think the thing we i agree on thing that we i think agree on is cases should be able to is that cases should be able to be processed swiftly. so that's what isn't happening . this is a what isn't happening. this is a kind of sticking plaster thing. they're trying bring down the they're trying to bring down the numbers but mean, numbers quickly. but i mean, 12,000 out of 166,000. you do the math . it's an enormous the math. it's not an enormous percentage from a narrow number of countries that have the highest except this is highest rate of except this is a particular band that they're trying trying to move trying to they're trying to move quickly. but thing that quickly. but the real thing that they be focusing is they should be focusing on is how you sustainably bring how can you sustainably bring that bring that down? because this is not a sustainable thing.

it apply to 154th it doesn't apply to 154th thousand people . so that means thousand people. so that means you have to have a proper, properly resourced system that can rapidly judge somebody claims and move people from being. if you come here as an asylum seeker, that's going to come to this legislation as a human traffickers dream, you'll be a tick tock advert within minutes of it being passed , you minutes of it being passed, you will face no interview in britain. you will get citizenship without even seeing an official . somebody will fill an official. somebody will fill in your form for, you know, via a translator. this is madness. the answer isn't processing people who arrive quicker . the people who arrive quicker. the answer is stopping them arrive in the first place or taking them back once they arrive. now, that is to do that legislation is there to do that. we have got less that. we just have got less politicians who want it. we could declare a state of national emergency. we could close our borders. we could we could send boats back to france. they the guts they simply don't have the guts for battle there, too. for that battle there, too. they've nose, by they've been led by the nose, by lawyers, they're too scared lawyers, and they're too scared of france. and that is why this government is on is on. harry

carey mission next time carey mission for the next time olivia's off those five countries. many of them are countries. how many of them are we not involved in war and in some way how many of those five just and how many of those countries ? all the all the countries? all the all the arrivals not coming from those countries, but they're actually coming from the nearest safe country, which is france. so and so that's what because i know the answer is almost all of them. if accept that them. so if we accept that already, someone is coming already, if someone is coming from afghanistan, libya , syria, from afghanistan, libya, syria, yemen, my friends , we have a yemen, my friends, we have a responsibility to be open to them and to and to go on to sign them and to and to go on to sign them to those to those cases. now, let's look at the albanians gaming the system and laughing all the way to the bank. well, then on the list the is on the list know let's just let's look at reality . and of course, at the reality. and of course, we have an obligation and a human activity and desire to help genuine asylum seekers . help genuine asylum seekers. nobodyis help genuine asylum seekers. nobody is saying that. i don't see how it is a genuine asylum seeker from yemen, for example,

a country that is being bombed with british bombs and british planes and with british personnel helping target those bombs. how is someone from that country meant to be able to claim asylum in the uk? what's a safe and legal route that they have? well, we know if have? well, how do we know if they under documents when they are under documents when they are under documents when they arrive our shores and they arrive at our shores and they're even from that country and surely having face and isn't surely having a face to interview , a way to face interview, a way of ascertaining which is which we don't. we do want to. james jones makes a good point here. the fact that there is no face to face interview. they've got a list of countries that don't sound quite like, yes, okay. there well, i think that there are well, i think that these i'm not this is an these i'm not saying this is an ideal thing for me is that ideal thing for me here, is that i from eritrea, if i could say from eritrea, if i've come from albania or something, i could just make it up. dont something, i could just make it up. don't have any up. things that don't have any documentation and thing it's documentation and thing is it's just questionnaire and there just a questionnaire and there is to face interview. is no face to face interview. wouldn't easy? wouldn't that just be easy? well, know. i mean, we well, i don't know. i mean, we wouldn't wouldn't mean, wouldn't they wouldn't i mean, i've days or something, i've got 20 days or something, to be honest with most of it. the possibility for abuse is

there, it's a possibility there, and it's a possibility for we must be for abuse is that we must be moving to risk class if what you're trying do and again, you're trying to do and again, as say, should be as i say, there should be a proper system where people should processed should be processed and given the that need and the support that they need and deserve fastest possible deserve in the fastest possible time this that this for time. this is not that this for a small number of the backlog. this isn't that this is a sticking plaster. but if you're trying to bring down the numbers and you take these are the countries that will have the highest percentage after interview going through and you're it quickly. you're trying to do it quickly. you understand and why that you can understand and why that is. you that the is. you can you can that the fact is that they've taken away one checks and balances one of the checks and balances to sure these people to make sure these people are actually places that actually from these places that have you know , approval have a 19.5, you know, approval rating. so the issue that i'm having with it is the fact that they take in any checks and balances out. have no problem balances out. i have no problem with if they're to with people if they're going to get these people from get 95% of these people from these yeah. asylum these countries. yeah. asylum within fair within this country. fair enough. we know enough. but how do we know they're actually from? and we know that a lot of those coming via crossings will throw know that a lot of those coming via documents will throw know that a lot of those coming via documents and throw know that a lot of those coming via documents and there's away documents and there's a body of evidence to show the

people in how people all schooled in how to game the system. you know, game the system. and, you know, you win the lottery if you win citizenship in britain, you ostensibly have free education for children, for life. you have free health care life . free health care for life. you'll be given a free hotels and free hostel and probably and a free hostel and probably a free if start free house. and if you start working well, working six months in. well, great. about forcing down great. what about forcing down wage the working wage prices for the working classes? know, working classes? you know, the working classes? you know, the working classes voice classes are the forgotten voice in this debate. and they in this whole debate. and they are on wheels of are crushed on the wheels of political correctness. and this plan is insane. is plan is insane. what is interesting that's interesting is i thought that's what was meant to what labour was meant to represent. but know, represent. but you know, momentum particular momentum in particular would have for the have looked out for the interests of the working class. but what someone for but let's see what someone for the working class the interests of working class actually by trying actually aren't served by trying to people against each to turn people against each other misdirect other and misdirect away. i don't this is. no, don't think that this is. no, no, no, no, no, wait, hold on. wait, wait. no i do that. do i do that? let's move on. right, let's look at some let's have a look at some of your responses. well david said how we're getting immigrants to fill form that fill in a form in order that they can fast it straight into they can fast it straight into the the boats the uk, stop the small boats coming over here. it won't. it will encourage more economic migrants jump on boats across

migrants to jump on boats across the paddy why the channel paddy says. why don't the channel paddy says. why dont send the channel paddy says. why don't send asylum don't we just send asylum application to the rest of application forms to the rest of the planet, population and anyone than anyone who scores over 95% could be invited to come and live here. let's see if we find somebody support we can find somebody in support of , julie says. why are of this, julie says. why are they not stopped in france after we millions the french we give millions to the french to stop this? the security of this country is in jeopardy. all right, i'll let you right, james. now i'll let you finish yes. the finish going. yes. so the interests of most people in this country are to have politics that deals with the enormous inequality, the lowered pay, the fact that our bills are being we're being ripped off . all of we're being ripped off. all of these things are should be the focus . and those are things and focus. and those are things and not, you know, this being the largest the largest issue , largest the largest issue, because the thing is holding down wages isn't that there will be a majority , i assume, of be a majority, i assume, of these 12,000 refugees from these war torn , these particular five

war torn, these particular five war torn, these particular five war torn, these particular five war torn country is granted granted asylum and wages are being wages are being held down by anti—trade union laws by the government , which refuses to government, which refuses to which is forcing pay cuts on nurses , teachers and public nurses, teachers and public sector workers . these are the sector workers. these are the things that are holding down the teeth. listen, james, i think you've got something very important that one of the things that did hold down wages was an influx of migrant labour workforce from the european. we can't be drunk on this cheap laboun can't be drunk on this cheap labour. so i think that's important. but i'm just saying that if you're going to give us that if you're going to give us that list, i appreciate some of the things that they said perfectly valid, but so is my point as well. but yeah. all right. well, let's move to on well, coming up, so can starmer lays five missions well, coming up, so can starmer lay the five missions well, coming up, so can starmer laythe uk five missions well, coming up, so can starmer laythe uk if five missions well, coming up, so can starmer laythe uk if he five missions well, coming up, so can starmer laythe uk if he wins missions well, coming up, so can starmer laythe uk if he wins the ;sions for the uk if he wins the election. but he's short on detail as ever.

welcome back to jeeves and co with me on a quiz. just getting up to 21 minutes after 6:00. this is ed's on tv online and on digital right with me until seven. my panel james snyder, he's a co—founder of momentum and was an advisor to jeremy corbyn. also, martin adoboli . corbyn. also, martin adoboli. he's a journalist and former brexit party mep. right so let's get some of your responses as well because we were discussing with regard to the asylum plan and let's see what others have said. oh, catherine says excellent watch. patrick was delighted to see nana for on michelle. sorry, i see what rebecca says . apparently they rebecca says. apparently they are allowed five of other members of their family to join them, so please feel free to multiply . them, so please feel free to multiply. that's them, so please feel free to multiply . that's 160,000 by five multiply. that's 160,000 by five interest thing, john says. we're going to let in people from five of the most dangerous countries in the world. terrorists etc. what about national secure t? what about national secure t? what about national secure t? what about my human rights to a peaceful life? no id, no entry.

go back and get it. that will reduce numbers . set up an office reduce numbers. set up an office in calais for those who have lost i.d. in calais for those who have lost id. i mean, she makes a good point. what about that, james? it could not have. they should set up something if people don't have i.d, when they get it that, there should be get it at that, there should be safe legal routes and all safe and legal routes and all sorts that they are sorts of places that they are currently. there currently aren't. but that doesn't change the people get here the fact that if people get here through legal through a non safe and legal route, they i have to be processed and if they have if they legitimate asylum seekers then should welcome them and then we should welcome them and be respected and decent about it. well michelle says this should never happen in the first place. this government failed to negotiate or the negotiate the terms or the deported bit, the portions the forces that this is a tory government failure that puts its own citizens at risk. and thanks as what a week pathetic government. it is now obvious that the prime minister and the rest of the current government are not up to the job. right. well, let's talk about the rest of the government, because the keir starmer says that he'll make fastest growing

make britain the fastest growing economy if he wins the economy in the g7 if he wins the next election. next general election. now, that's his five that's the first of his five missions. if labour a missions. if labour form a government. the others government. now the others include making a clean include making britain a clean energy superpower. so i'm presuming that's more net zero, improving the nhs and reforming the justice system. james are these five missions a recipe for electoral success, do you think 7 electoral success, do you think ? no. the recipe for labour's electoral success is the tory self destruction. that's what's happening. k starmer is. i mean this speech really says almost nothing. like you can see overstatement is a real statement or a politician statement or a politician statement if you can do the opposite of it. i want a better britain . it's meaningless. it's britain. it's meaningless. it's a politician thing because no one's to stand up and say one's going to stand up and say i the worst . britain, if i want the worst. britain, if you to tax the rich you say i want to tax the rich or i want more money for the nhs, those are real statements because you can say the opposite of them. but keir starmer's speech, his things are i want to grow the economy. well, yeah , grow the economy. well, yeah, great. i mean, who who doesn't improve the nhs give opportunity

for all these, the kind of warm bromides they don't, they don't mean very much, but he's very lucky in his opponents because in this country you've got one of two options for who's going to be the government and the other. the other option keeps blowing themselves up. so in comparison, saying basically nothing looks quite good now, but you're a momentum then i would expect is some sort of support towards the idea of keir starmer heading up the labour party in the labour party winning. is that not a good thing surely for if labour thing surely for you if labour labour it will be better labour wins it will be a better government than tory government than the tory government. happy. but government. so i'm happy. but it's like fundamental it's not like the fundamental problems facing with problems that we're facing with the biggest collapse in living standards in basically in the last 300, in fact probably since the black death, maybe overdramatise isn't it is the black death. maybe that's actually did boost wages afterwards. but anyway , getting afterwards. but anyway, getting thrown in again but. afterwards. but anyway, getting thrown in again but . against the thrown in again but. against the it's not going to do very much

saying i'm going to grow the economy doesn't mean that the economy doesn't mean that the economy is going to grow, saying that i'm going improve the that i'm going to improve the nhs doesn't that nhs nhs doesn't mean that the nhs is going improve. i'm very going to improve. so i'm very disappointed starmer's disappointed in starmer's leadership an leadership because there is an agenda that he could be putting forward most forward that actually most people go some people support and would go some of way dealing some of the way to dealing with some of the way to dealing with some of crises we face. for of the crises we face. for example, on the energy crisis, pubuc example, on the energy crisis, public ownership of energy is extremely popular. about three quarters of the public want it, including the majority of to re voters. it's common sense it could help bring bills down, but it's something that he moves away from. he backtracked. he said, you said it's going to turn. this is the end of the backtrack again. well, this is this is the other point. so this is five missions beforehand. is his five missions beforehand. he's had his three he's had his his three principles, his full values , his principles, his full values, his ten pledges. next, we'll have his three represent a thousand flowers blooming a bit like covid of the three tiers. five days, we're all in tears. martin i don't think labour looks so much a policy of government as

the tories look like a party of opposition. i mean, i totally agree you, james, they agree with you, james, that they all self—destructing our all self—destructing before our eyesin all self—destructing before our eyes in a way that i think few of even thought was possible. of us even thought was possible. i know, back the i mean, you know, back in the day i fought in the general day when i fought in the general election saw the election in 2019 and we saw the 80 majority came in, the 80 seat majority came in, the tories were so boring, they said the labour leader hasn't the next labour leader hasn't even but what even been born. but what a difference couple of years difference a couple of years makes. are looking makes. here we are now looking down the barrel of a labour government is almost certainly going to happen. barring a miracle, i don't think we need to on the fact that no to focus on the fact that no captain moved into captain hindsight has moved into captain it's as captain platitude. it's easy, as you james, sort of soul you say, james, to sort of soul these dreams, need these pipe dreams, but we need to look into the some of the detail. one of the things that really out at me, as you really leapt out at me, as you said, zero, this this said, about net zero, this this nofion said, about net zero, this this notion he said be notion that he said we will be carbon neutral with our electricity by 2030. there's electricity by 2030. how there's nobody world that can nobody in the world that can achieve that. if the plan is renewables, that when we must remember the moment that unreliable certainly uncosted unreliable, certainly uncosted unrealistic unicorn politics. there's more chance of powering the government on the hotter

coming out of these conferences than there is on renewables. we should instead be looking to get this net zero nonsense look at our own shale. we import shale, we import gas from america , we we import gas from america, we import coal from australasia , import coal from australasia, from around the planet. we need it to keep the lights on. let's mine and dig our own, create jobs, don't give all the money away , ditch net zero and away, ditch net zero and actually i feel politically homeless . i'm sure a lot of homeless. i'm sure a lot of people do . so. keir starmer's people do. so. keir starmer's clean energy superpower mission is the only one that means anything because it's the only one that martin can disagree with. my it has real it has real meaning. i happen to completely support actually support net zero. of course. have zero. yeah of course. so have you got electric car. don't you got an electric car. i don't have a car. right. i'd actually electric there electric cars says there isn't enough the world in enough lithium in the world in order to go fully so . even so order to go fully so. even so even you've said that. so you must acknowledge that part of the thing that you're supporting is bit of nonsense, really, is a bit of nonsense, really, because pushing because they're pushing that. they're literally they're going to literally they're rid of they're going to get rid of electric, everything, all petrol and no more, more

and diesel, no more, no more production this production of them in this country. 2030, across country. but in 2030, across europe, 2035. they've europe, that's 2035. they've actually this actually put it forward in this kind so it's actually kind of 2030. so it's actually impossible to achieve even their own statistics say yeah , own statistics say that, yeah, so to have big so i want to have big investments in public transport and make it much cheaper because that's going to be better for the environment, it's going to be better for the majority of people in the country. have you got kids? not not. you know got kids? not yet. not. you know what? very well. what? this is all very well. i hear lot. what you need hear this a lot. what you need to do actually when you do to do is actually when you do have two children, imagine trying all to school trying to get them all to school with bicycle where the with no bicycle where the schools miles away and schools about two miles away and the net zero vision is a complete unreality to the people who actually have to with who actually have to deal with it a daily basis, it because on a daily basis, getting your children to school, doing of us, you doing all this most of us, you might be fine as individual might be fine as an individual man pushbike doing all man on your pushbike doing all your but i don't think your stuff, but i don't think fact to get a real well okay so okay so let's take that example if going down. yeah if we're going to go down. yeah let's let's go down the cars. let's go let's go down the cars. right. so saying that we right. so i'm saying that we will fewer we have will have fewer we will have fewer private cars and the ones that we do have and some of them

will be like cars, we'll will be like zip cars, we'll have zip cars. right. so have more zip cars. right. so you things. there's you can do those things. there's just will be fewer cars. just there will be fewer cars. you get what do you get? the zip car from just out of interest? did you go to a station, go higher, other higher, were up with other people what you people harming zipcar. what you are taking away letting them are taking away and letting them carry i'm just i'm carry on because i'm just i'm just your vision. just trying to see your vision. you in support of this net you are in support of this net zero thing and it's part of sir keir pledge. mean, keir starmer pledge. so i mean, i mean, just put it into the i mean, to just put it into the real world, to give an example of you it actually of how you see it actually working, right? so the, the, working, right? so so the, the, the number of journeys that we can take out of private cars, there a number like there are a whole number like you what will hold you will agree what will hold and you agree there and you will agree that there are so if there is are some. and so if there is more public transport and it is cheapen more public transport and it is cheaper, you accept that some people will move from cars people will move from from cars to transport if they're to public transport if they're able single their able bodied and single on their own. saying own. but i'm not saying everybody, is a chunk, everybody, but that is a chunk, right? if you have an right? then if you have an expansion of carpool lane and you have a, like i say, you could have a, like i say, zipcar type thing, but a publicly owned one that that covers a whole host of other

journeys. so then you've reduced the of people need the number of people that need to private car to a to have a private car to a smaller level, which perhaps could be if you're you're could well be if you're you're beginning to sound like. keir starmer i'm really not. i think you on that this this sort transport policy works for the people who live in the areas that come up with it metropolitan cyclist zone one in central london . that's it. it central london. that's it. it works for them. i mean , one in works for them. i mean, one in the real world now, a painter and painter. and that meant to balance a lot is on the reds, whether when they're on a broad, it's not really, you know, i mean, you go someplace that mean, if you go someplace that no shropshire goes by, it's like nottinghamshire, yorkshire, pubuc nottinghamshire, yorkshire, public right. public transport. you're right. it's gonna get it's terrible. it's gonna get better time how better any time soon. how are like tradesmen and small business owners to to business owners meant to get to work? it's it's a pipe work? it's not. it's a pipe dream. it works in cities. but we're not amsterdam's, but we have rural areas with no have huge rural areas with no infrastructure and people need their calls. and every government sends the tax motorists and the existence because they're seen a cash because they're seen as a cash cow bled dry is wrongheaded and it the poorest working

it impacts the poorest working classes, the holders, the unison boss came out today condemning city council ulez plan because hitting nhs workers as workers , hitting nhs workers as workers, nurses and care workers hasn't been thought through is ideological and what it means reality. bankruptcy and it's not actually just the labour party, i hasten to add, told us that the battle is just as bad. yeah we have nowhere to go. and in your supporting and even as you're explaining you can, you must understand that it's not making to me as mother, making sense to me as a mother, as single as a working as a single mum, as a working mom, i'm thinking i move mom, i'm thinking unless i move next the school, which, next door to the school, which, you luckily actually you know, luckily i actually happen that. but happen to have done that. but it's to do with of it's nothing to do with any of that. it'sjust i couldn't it's nothing to do with any of that. it's just i couldn't be bothered to do the cardio and i didn't to do it anymore. didn't want to do it anymore. but was hard to but that was pretty hard to find. particular property find. that particular property in location. you can in that location. you can imagine really deeply imagine how how really deeply sought near sought after properties near schools the schools are that your the concept that this is not in the real world simply isn't okay real world it simply isn't okay what isn't in the real world is not reducing our fossil fuels because we are going to reach climate tipping points, which are going to which are going to

dramatically increase food costs. they're going to push up the costs of economic production we've already got. yeah, yeah. and yeah. and this is just the start and you're going to feel it much worse. we don't have an opfion it much worse. we don't have an option of doing nothing. i'm not. i really wish that we had governments around the world who, for the last 30 years have been doing good, sensible things so that they amount that we had the speed and scale of our transition. how does it could be much easier? how do we go down beyond what is so you can't buy an electric one. so how does the cost of living go down for people with old calls who are disproportionally going to be poorer have to get rid poorer if they have to get rid of that and a new car or of that car and buy a new car or lease as if coal? how is it going to make life better going to make their life better to their life more to make their life more expensive? no. let it expensive? well, no. let it also. i'm talking about the also. so i'm talking about the impact of breakdown, impact of climate breakdown, which to, of course, which is going to, of course, impact who least impact people who have the least the well, hang on. the the most. well, hang on. the climate , is this the climate breakdown, is this the world in world going to hell in a handcart? that sort of thing.

you're regard co2 you're saying with regard to co2 and emissions? look, and carbon emissions? look, i mean, question the levels of mean, i question the levels of that science. anyway, you that science. but anyway, you know, let's okay, let's put that to and let's just go to one side and let's just go with the way are with you the way things are right we our own gas right now. we have our own gas and that we're not and electricity that we're not using fact, lot of the using. in fact, a lot of the electricity we're using comes from fuel , and electricity we're using comes from fuel, and most of it from fossil fuel, and most of it doesit from fossil fuel, and most of it does it pretty much most of it. and you do envisage a world and if you do envisage a world where all going electric where we are all going electric and with stream, let's and going with the stream, let's all electric cars at all plug our electric cars in at the same time. you know what's going to happen, the loss of the lights going to go out. lights are all going to go out. so saying with this so what we're saying with this is totally unrealistic. is it is totally unrealistic. and you just use and that's why if you just use that one, one of his five missions as a mission, that you can he has no can challenge, he has no answers. neither of answers. neither none of the parties so that is a way in parties do. so that is a way in which you can elect you can green the electricity grid and what you can build onshore and offshore wind. you can have solar panels, you can have hydropower . these are all things hydropower. these are all things that you can have. what about when there's no wind or sun, which is the winter? which which is which is why you need

is which? which is why you need a of different different a balance of different different energy course, that energy sources. of course, that is i'm not saying that is the case. i'm not saying that tomorrow will have no fossil tomorrow we will have no fossil fuels our in our energy mix. fuels in our in our energy mix. of course we won't. that would be that. that's that's not physically possible. we do physically possible. but we do have as rapidly as have to move as rapidly as possible having a clean grid possible to having a clean grid . and there are perfectly robust nuclear, if you like, nuclear you use nuclear. corbyn is probably against new i don't like nuclear power but i think where nuclear already exists then we should keep it on a pragmatic grounds . again, for pragmatic grounds. again, for this reason you're saying about balancing takes 20 years to build nuclear power station. so what about ten and the mini reactors as well we don't have can do they could do that but i mean of course it was the labour party's stopped all of that. well let's see what some of you have been saying. richard said with to keir starmer's with regard to keir starmer's five it says after five visions, it says that after over 100 of conservative over 100 years of conservative and in office, we have and labour in office, we have a barely governable as far barely governable country as far as as the thick electorate as this as the thick electorate concerned, the answer is more of the same , kevin says. starmer is

the same, kevin says. starmer is full of empty promises. he would sell his own mother just to get vote, but instead saying these missions is one thing. carrying them out is another. they say anything to get voted in things said. i'd like to hear what starmer would do regarding small boats . well, that's always good boats. well, that's always good to hear. and then he says, all as all political , do they say, as all political, do they say, do they say what they think would gain them would gain them votes when they win, they change when they're from, when their promises that. they all promises that. exactly. they all do ? well, do that don't they? well, listen, with coming up, listen, stay with us. coming up, how would like to be paid how would you like to be paid the same amount to work a day less maybe it possible for less maybe it is possible for all full day working week all of full day working week suggests that it could be the future .

is just gone . 37 minutes after is just gone. 37 minutes after 6:00. welcome back to dewbs& co.

with me now on a quick with me until seven my panel james schneider is the co—founder of momentum and wasn't it thanks to jeremy corbyn and also martin daubney is a journalist and former brexit party mep. right. so let's have a look at some of your responses. so we were talking with regard to starmer and his five admissions poll says labour will almost certainly be the next government for not being tories, not for popular policies with real people , gordon says. i live in a people, gordon says. i live in a village of 5000 in essex, 20 miles from a major town . we have miles from a major town. we have four buses a day and the nearest train station is four miles away with the last train at 10 pm. what should we do when i'm calling quickly? australians, what should they do? there should be proper buses and proper public services. i mean, of course if they don't, if they don't that then have don't have that then they have to course i'm not. i'm to drive of course i'm not. i'm not. i mean you so i'm pretty sure. yeah. the bus service is in this country outside london are shocking. yeah in london,

their price controls in outside london, they're not. they're more expensive , they're less more expensive, they're less reliable. and often you get the bizarre thing of having to companies on the same routes and you can't on one bus and you can only get on the one afterwards. it's that's completely mad and that needs to go. i've got mine too. think keir starmer too. think sir keir starmer should to your should be invited to your village and give village in essex. and let's give him a couple of tasks like do the shopping, do this, do that. instead got like 24 hours instead he's got like 24 hours to city manager to complete it. city manager with transport that to complete it. city manager with that transport that to complete it. city manager with that we transport that to complete it. city manager with that we should�*t that to complete it. city manager with that we should d01at he says that we should do because they wouldn't a because they wouldn't have a school. no, you wouldn't have scooby doo, would he. right. well same well if you offered the same salary hours, salary to work fewer hours, would you take it. well you would, wouldn't, would. but how would, wouldn't, would. but how would feel? well, would your boss feel? well, according new study, according to one new study, maybe be fine maybe he or she would be fine with it. 61 employers took part in trial of four day working in a trial of a four day working week over the course of six months. last year. and most of them want to doing it. them want to keep doing it. martin what's not to like about this ? it's echoes back to the this? it's echoes back to the previous conversation. but this works really well if you're part

the middle class office sense, if you work for the civil service as no, no reason why , service as no, no reason why, it's been a huge kind of boon of the socialist left for many years. i love the four day week because they want people to be dependent on the state but work part time. well, that's bankrolled by taxpayers. so i think of might work well think some of it might work well for the sort of last a class that can work in their pyjamas and slippers. they got used and slippers. they got very used to sitting at home to sort of sitting at home furlough. meanwhile, the furlough. but meanwhile, in the real world, to my previous real world, back to my previous point how can a bricklayer point of how can a bricklayer build as many walls in days as he can, even five for the same on the internet? there is this disconnect between this this utopia in the future where we all sort of sit around with headsets and kind of know , grow headsets and kind of know, grow obese, you know , meanwhile, obese, you know, meanwhile, ordinary people need to get out there and work. and how do we have part time nurses or taxi drivers or bill does so again , drivers or bill does so again, it's an idea that's very popular with kind of middle class

metropolitan socialists in the real world. peter share the head and go what planet? though you may even need a large workforce as well. if you're going to do that, do you think, james? that, what do you think, james? well obviously, i think if you can work fewer hours the can work fewer hours and the companies think that the productivity is the same . the productivity is the same. the most interesting thing about this study that they got this study is not that they got 61 companies take part , it's 61 companies to take part, it's that of them are going to that most of them are going to keep it. and it's not keep on doing it. and it's not all your you miscarry all your or however you miscarry victories. people, people who work , there's a fish and chip work, there's a fish and chip shop who's part of it. there's a brewery, here's part of it. there's a range of different things. some companies aren't going on. those going to carry on. maybe those are ones that the are the ones that the overwhelming them overwhelming majority of them are going to carry on because it may be it won't work for all workers and all companies and all sectors. and then that won't be the case. but for the ones where you can do the same amount of work in less time, why wouldn't you ? why wouldn't you wouldn't you? why wouldn't you take that up ? well, let me take that up? well, let me answer that question. i'm going

to answer that. well, this is not why i say if somebody said to me, we're going to do a trial, we're going to do a trial of a certain period of time, see if you're just as productive as you would be if you did four days instead of or days instead of five or pay exactly know what exactly the same. you know what i would do during that trial? you still what my. but often i would do during that trial? ydo still what my. but often i would do during that trial? ydo the what my. but often i would do during that trial? ydo the best/hat my. but often i would do during that trial? ydo the best oft my. but often i would do during that trial? ydo the best of amy. but often i would do during that trial? ydo the best of a job but often i would do during that trial? ydo the best of a job and often i would do during that trial? ydo the best of a job and then i do the best of a job and then i'll deceive into thinking i'll deceive them into thinking that that is the right thing. and then when it comes down to my and i know people my four days and i know people might not be doing that consciously it down consciously when it comes down to they go to my four days and they go along with it, i'd probably slow down. okay, two things. so down. okay, well, two things. so let's, see what happens let's, let's see what happens with companies going with these companies going going forward of forward because they've some of them to doing it them have committed to doing it permanent. them permanent. some of them said they want keep it going. they want to keep it going. let's what they say. but let's see what they say. but also, is the only such also, this is not the only such study from around the world that has seen you reduce hours, has seen when you reduce hours, productivity goes that's productivity goes up. that's what we're talking about. britain's bad britain's got very, very bad labour relative labour productivity relative to other countries. other kind of similar countries. france costs, france germany, those costs, i don't they said about don't know. they said that about from the beginning. and from home at the beginning. and then realised that the then they realised that at the beginning it was good, you know.

and so if it works for, for everyone really based on everyone and really based on seem from this seem at least from this study, this this like a win win this is this is like a win win win for worker themselves. win for the worker themselves. clearly it's a win for the employer if they've got happier workers better workers who are doing better work, a win for them work, that's a win for them and for society. you've got for society. if you've got parents spending more parents who are spending more time kids, people time with their kids, people who've more time to like to who've got more time to like to take social clubs or to take part in social clubs or to see friends family or we've see friends or family or we've got problem of loneliness in got a problem of loneliness in this country. they see see this country. maybe they see see a that they don't see a parent that they don't see enough aunt and uncle or enough or an aunt and uncle or whatever. it's whatever. this seems like it's a good thing. so it's days, good thing. so it's early days, obviously , but it seems like if obviously, but it seems like if it's working , let's see how much it's working, let's see how much more it is. it's very fluffy, isn't it? sounds very nice, but i think we need to sort of have a go to about this because it always starts off with the crass brewery in brighton with the graphic designer in croydon , and graphic designer in croydon, and then the next side is, well let's, let's extend it to the civil. how about if we try and in middle management picked up by the taxpayer . i don't want to

by the taxpayer. i don't want to be a taxpayer paying for people to work four days a week. they should be working five days a week. we're already seeing an empty syndrome and what empty desk syndrome and what civil if asset civil service? what if the asset is though. that's that is the same though. that's that that's the output is that's the is if the output is the same working 6 hours or 8 hours a day or i mean you could do it all the ways, right? well, if the output the same for days then if the output was the same, then if the output was the same, then i would insist that they work harder because they can do it days. they do the it in four days. they do the same in four days and i expect them to do more in five. but actually i think in the world i don't work like that. i think the landscape how the whole landscape of how people changing people work is actually changing and working. some and people are working. some people work seven days or 3 hours, one day, hours another, hours, one day, 2 hours another, and don't think that that's and i don't think that that's how anymore. yes, i do how it works anymore. yes, i do think yeah. mean, so think it does. yeah. i mean, so many cab and builders who many small cab and builders who happen to work, you know, all the hours god sends just to pay their gas bills. so notion their gas bills. so this notion that i mean, if private companies were small workforce , companies were small workforce, want it, break a leg, go want to do it, break a leg, go it and know all power to your

it and i know all power to your elbow. i say, my worry is elbow. but as i say, my worry is this then becomes some sort of new normal where the taxpayer is picking on the bit, because that's that's the goal. that's the that's the goal. that's why socialists are so keen on the four day week and they more dependency, they want more state dependency, more was also that more so. and it was also that it's a demand from workers it's been a demand from workers from the labour movement for 200 years to have more freedom, to have more time to itself. it used to be 60, now 12 hour working day that was in 8 hours weekend that we could yes we should expand the only human freedom we should have more time to do so with the people that we like. that's a nice idea. i wish it was that way. and you could just get paid money for doing nothing. just a nice nothing. but it's just a nice utopia. graham says people utopia. graham says most people hate any incentive to do hate work any incentive to do less bound to success, less is bound to be a success, of exactly vernon said. of course. exactly vernon said. since have a job since lockdown, you have a job getting do three days. getting people to do three days. you point. it's you make a good point. it's true. if the staff true. and he says, if the staff now do four days what they did in five, they were clearly slacking . what were their slacking. what were their managers doing? see that's what

i thought well at the summer. i thought as well at the summer. look, says, can superman look, peter says, can superman work a four day week? so loads of people coming in with that one. well, coming up you can't one. well, coming up, you can't keep woman down. lady keep a good woman down. lady susan hussey is back on royal duties. is princess anne also to fill in at a memorial service .

welcome back , dewbs& co. with me welcome back, dewbs& co. with me now a choir with me until seven. my now a choir with me until seven. my panel , james schneider. he's my panel, james schneider. he's a co—founder of momentum and was an adviser to jeremy corbyn and also martin daubney. he's a journalist and former brexit party mep . right. so earlier we party mep. right. so earlier we were talking about as we go to jobs working for four days a week, jenny says , i've got week, jenny says, i've got a late season. elsie or bernard says since lockdown you get a job getting people to the office for three days. i think we did

that one before, chris said i would just get another job on friday and get a 25% pay rise. yeah right. let's move on yeah right. well, let's move on because we're all familiar with the case of lady susan hussey, who was ousted from a position at the palace after the so—called row with charity so—called race row with charity boss. it ngozi fulani, otherwise known headley. but known as marlene headley. but yesterday, princess and showed pubuc yesterday, princess and showed public support for lady , asking public support for lady, asking her to step in at her memorial service . at a memorial service. service. at a memorial service. james, you think it's right that lady susan elsie has been returned to royal duties? i'm really sorry, but i don't know. and i don't care. i didn't follow story particularly at follow the story particularly at all. i don't know the ins and outs of the palace, and i don't come on this panel and don't really know. you don't get so well. i don't think anybody could have done a fine a put down of this the new i mean said there were three calls in many interviews now you're over a million sorry. i mean, it's a massive so huge tight down of marlene funny people ostensibly culturally a proper created african culture as i think a

career move and then rocks up to castle and you know an elderly lady who with many years of fine pubuc lady who with many years of fine public service into her bones i think was quite within her rights to make the sort of small thought we all make when we meet a complete stranger, a splash especially one ostensibly in national costume, was a national costume. i don't know anywhere where you get that. i think the lot the bits that look lot of the bits on that look like come from stratford like they come from stratford or something like that. but the point is, if i was to go out dressed in that way and somebody asked me, where am i, where am i from? i would not even be surprised they would be surprised that they would be asking i'll be asking me because i'll be wearing outfit. draw wearing the outfit. draw attention yes. somebody attention to my yes. so somebody asked from and asked you where you're from and then say, oh, i'm from then you say, oh, i'm from clapham wherever. be clapham or wherever. they'd be like, you really from? like, where are you really from? yeah, because your outfit doesn't like you from doesn't look like you come from clapham. like you've clapham. it looks like you've come so it's just not come inside, so it's just not actually intrusive question. i mean, be mean, james, would you be offended asks you offended if somebody asks you where from? so i have where are you from? so i have actually now i think about it i have actually once been offended. when was offended. offended when i was

asked you really from? asked where are you really from? you well, because you know, well, because i thought was anti—semitic. thought it was anti—semitic. i was know what? but was being asked, know what? but where from? and where are you really from? and it it was it was it felt like it was it was anti—semitic from asking you where you really from, in what way, can that will that way, how can that will that where was? it was where you thought it was? it was in a over overseas. watch it in a pub over overseas. watch it was in 2006 remembering it was it was the euros, i think. and watch a game and you know having a conversation someone turns around says, are you where you from? i said, i'm from london, so i know. no, but where are you really from? what i'm i'm from london not. you're london is. i know not. you're not really from from england where you've way from i mean where you've way from and i mean not this. it's not not present like this. it's not like anyway, i can see like but anyway, so i can see how that is. but she didn't say that. as i saying i don't know what she but but you just what she said but but you just asked can it can you be asked me can it be can you be made to feel uncomfortable by someone you really someone say no. where you really from? and actually now i think about it, yes, i can, because because have i like i've had because i have i like i've had people why my film and people ask me why my film and then my parents then i'll say that my parents are i was born in

are from i was born in newcastle, said where newcastle, they said well where are really from, where are are you really from, where are your family? that me is your family? so that to me is sort of it's an interesting question they about and question they ask about me and actually my background, my ethnic actually from ethnic heritage is actually from ghanain ethnic heritage is actually from ghana in west africa, which i'm very proud to. it depends if anybody me. think that anybody asked me. i think that i it depends. was it's it depends. it depends. was it's like so surname is like like so my surname is schneider. so people ask me all the where are from? the time, where are you from? you know, they said, were you do you heritage? you have german heritage? and i say, yiddish and that's say, no, it's yiddish and that's fine. not not fine. that's not that's not unpleasant. but i do have this one case where it was unpleasant, so i don't know, i wasn't there. i don't know much about the case, but in theory i can someone, you know, can see how someone, you know, a three year old woman, i know. i don't know. i don't know the circumstances or what it's like. don't know. i don't know the circurcannces or what it's like. don't know. i don't know the circurcan see or what it's like. don't know. i don't know the circurcan see that/hat it's like. don't know. i don't know the circurcan see that ifat it's like. don't know. i don't know the circurcan see that if someone. but i can see that if someone saying you know, but when saying to, you know, but when you from what they're you really from what they're saying is but you're not you know, you're not part of if know, you're not part of what if you community what you you community or what if you were some of were dressed in some sort of african cobbled outfit. that's obviously you're from. and african cobbled outfit. that's obvisaid, you're from. and african cobbled outfit. that's obvisaid, oh, you're from. and african cobbled outfit. that's obvisaid, oh, around re from. and african cobbled outfit. that's obvisaid, oh, around the �*om. and african cobbled outfit. that's obvisaid, oh, around the corner. d you said, oh, around the corner. and no way. you and i said, no, no way. you really from because you're dressed would

dressed in a way that would suggest if i'm wearing my body. yeah, you're wearing sort of like this. things as a look like this. this things as a look at i'm from you wouldn't you at me. i'm from you wouldn't you wouldn't offended if somebody wouldn't be offended if somebody honestly question honestly asked you that question repeated. no, because they obviously didn't think, well, how on the how come you weren't on the skins repeatedly night skins on the repeatedly night and i don't know if someone says, where are you from? and i say, i'm round the corner. say, i'm from round the corner. and said, no, but are and they said, no, but where are you and i say, i'm so you from? and i say, i'm so funny. around they funny. around the corner they say, but where are you say, no, but where are you really and i said, no, really from? and i said, no, from round the corner. and then i can see how you would think it was a eventually. now you mentioned skull quite mentioned i was once skull quite badly somebody said, oh, badly when somebody said, oh, you're not. you're from derby. oh i'm not. but joke to me. but that was just joke to me. like back the story i do like back to the story i do think the palace buckled like a like a cheap suitcase when this happened, they threw her under the bus. disgrace fully. and i'm delighted that she's being allowed back into the public. so service where she belongs did a fantastic job. and i think she deserves a full apology. i really do. i she was treated terribly and i just think we're in a situation now where

victimhood is a badge of honour and people want to destroy each other's careers. and what better target than the royal family if you're an activist of the persuade region of mali? well she was an activist as well. and ironically , her own charity, ironically, her own charity, which only will take you on if you're african or caribbean. so if you've got that heritage, you'll actually that's the first question she would actually answer that she's turned away mixed well, mixed race women. well, i actually about that. yeah, actually know about that. yeah, well, but her defence, well, but but in her defence, she's speak she's not here to speak for herself . yeah, right. let's see. herself. yeah, right. let's see. well, it was mind well, veronica says it was mind boggung well, veronica says it was mind boggling they boggling how quickly they betrayed all know what betrayed her. we all know what lady was about. often when lady susan was about. often when we strangers, we're to make we meet strangers, we're to make pleasantries both sides, pleasantries at both sides, asked really personal questions, and side takes and neither side takes offensive. says palace offensive. jenny says the palace should be shamed at the way they treated ladies. is the stupidity not invest debasing. not fully invest the debasing. well so much well listen thank you so much for thank you for your thoughts. thank you very my panel, martin very much to my panel, martin daubney, also . james knight. daubney, and also. james knight. i couldn't say well , what i couldn't say well, what a pleasure it's been debating with you. your father, but we've got

the same time, same season. hello there. i'm greg you host and welcome to your latest broadcast from the met office . broadcast from the met office. over the next few days, high pressure remains firmly in charge. we will see some rain south over the next 24 hours, but settled is but generally settled picture is what we see. and we can see that high pressure on the synoptic charts just to the west of us at the moment, allowing these weather to slowly push weather systems to slowly push south. but every week in nature . should be light . so the range should be light and patchy. rain already and patchy. the rain already across scotland, northern england as we head through the evening clear skies evening time, clear skies further south, particularly central, parts of central, southern parts of england and wales will mean temperatures tumbling here, minus minus two celsius minus one or minus two celsius will a patchy frost will lead to a patchy frost under the cloud and patchy rain elsewhere, holding up well above freezing but does mean freezing. but it does mean a cloudy start to friday morning across central and northern parts of the uk. early brightness limited far brightness limited to the far south and through the day this weather system slowly pushes its way southwards. we will see some patchy it at times, patchy rain along it at times, but will brighten up behind

but it will brighten up behind this, particularly across northern england, and northern england, scotland and then northern then later on across northern ireland could see one or two showers rolling down east showers rolling down the east coast quite a keen northerly coast on quite a keen northerly breeze. temperatures here 7 to 9 degrees, but the cloud degrees, but under the cloud further 11 or 12 as further south, 11 or 12 as a high. this weather system into the evening pushes its way southwards. see clearing southwards. we see clearing skies behind it, particularly in the will continue to in the west. we will continue to in the west. we will continue to in the hours to one or the early hours to see one or two showers filtering across two showers filtering in across the so see a bit of the east. so we'll see a bit of a with temperatures as we a split with temperatures as we head towards the night time minus of course, some minus 1 to —4. of course, some western areas holding up above freezing with that freeze across the far east . but it does mean the far east. but it does mean a bright start saturday for many of us, the best of the sunshine across central western areas across central and western areas , though cloud across the east does more as we head does filter in more as we head through bubbling up through the day, bubbling up into afternoon , 1 to into the afternoon, 1 to 2 showers possible still these moving way inland, perhaps moving their way inland, perhaps a little wintry over the a little bit wintry over the higher ground of northern england, scotland, england, northeast scotland, temperatures chillier on saturday into sunday. a lot saturday and into sunday. a lot of dry weather weather's come over the next few days.

temperatures around see temperatures around average. see you soon. westminster is going around an ever decreasing circles follow by the media. britain is broken. how on earth did we get into this mess? but more important lately, how do we get out of it? join me at 7 pm. monday through thursdays on farage here on gb news we will have open, rational . we've got have open, rational. we've got to work out how britain moves forward from this. join us here on gb news, the people's channel. britain is watching . channel. britain is watching. it's all about family being in people's living rooms, all the interaction and getting to know who our viewers and listeners are. when i was young, my dad used to say, not, not stop arguing. i wanted an outlet that would enable me to give my opinion . people going opinion. people are going through hard time right through a really hard time right now i know that you don't now and i know that you don't feel like you're being listened to by the establishment . i came to by the establishment. i came to by the establishment. i came to gb news because it's the people's and i want the people's channel and i want the audience to have say on audience to have their say on the of the day, which we

the events of the day, which we do something different. democracy the wisdom democracy shows that the wisdom of the nation is in its people. i get to travel to find out what the story is from a personal perspective. the

it's thursday night and this huge star arrives at your . well huge star arrives at your. well exit hotel. please welcome your host nigel barrow . well here host nigel barrow. well here lies in the dark in the south, where all tories even want to be down here in the blue. labour through . it's a big farming through. it's a big farming area. asked have they been left behind ? what i found out about behind? what i found out about from joining us for talking by the most famous and most infamous west politician. yes neil parish. but before all of