n0 spin , no bias, no spin , no bias, no censorship. no spin, no bias, no censorship. this is dan wootton tonight with me patrick christys . a smug gary me patrick christys. a smug gary lineker broken cover after his crass jibe . do you fear getting crass jibe. do you fear getting suspended? no. you might even . suspended? no. you might even. gary reckons he's presenting of the day this saturday as well. but home secretary suella braverman definitely doesn't agree with his claim that it's been blown out of proportion. a person or point of view to hear that kind characterisation is

offensive because as you said, my husband is jewish. my children are therefore directly descendant so the project grows onune descendant so the project grows online account be joined by fleet street icon kelvin mackenzie on england legend letizia and they will give that no holds barred takes on the saga. just what was stunning by the taxpayer political activist due to the already troubled reputation . don't miss them both reputation. don't miss them both later in the show. i'll kick right off, if you excuse the pun. also coming up with people smugglers, reports the offering cross—channel speedboat for an eyewatering £7,000. all economic gaming, all lenience asylum system. ukip leader neil hamilton on human rights lawyer. show of cargo to head and not seen the clash very very soon then ex—tory ann widdecombe gives her view big woody style on president macron's plans to block russia's illegal migration bill. can we really trust the french? plus as bombshell reports time, the palace expects

the sussexes to attend the coronation. prince harry's angela levin explains why she thinks harry and meghan are using children as political pawns . i'll give you them. pawns. i'll give you them. prince and princess titles. don't miss angela's scathing analysis on the latest sussex drama and socialist labour mp clive lewis demands restitution for the caribbean islands. ready now i can hear the howls of those opposed reparations. an apology which no british government has ever given . i government has ever given. i will explain why demands for slavery reparations are utter utter nonsense in my digest next and i'll get the view of my superstar panellists tonight. i'm joined by dominique samuels , shaun bailey and amy strong wave game against strong wave game. and a first look at tomorrow's front pages and a new greatest person on union jackass coming up to say this is double said tonight with me. patrick christys. let's go .

christys. let's go. stay locked in my digest that's coming your way very shortly. but first is the news with rory . hello, i'm rory smith in the gb newsroom. gary lineker been accused of diminishing tragedy of the holocaust with the home secretary saying she find his comments offensive . the bbc comments offensive. the bbc presenter is under fire for comparing the government's language around its new immigration policy to that used by germany in the 1930. he's described the fallout as ridiculously out of proportion. culture secretary lucy frazer told the commons the broadcaster must remain impartial. told the commons the broadcaster must remain impartial . as must remain impartial. as somebody grandmother escaped germany in the 1930s, i think

it's really disappointing and inappropriate to compare government policy on immigration events to on immigration, to events to on immigration, to events in germany in the 1930s. have a is important for the bbc to maintain impartiality if. it is to retain the trust of the pubuc is to retain the trust of the public who pay the licence fee . public who pay the licence fee. transport secretary says . transport secretary says. construction of hitches to between birmingham and crewe will be delayed by two years. mark harper says that is due to increased costs and sickness and inflationary pressure . but inflationary pressure. but labour says the delay means the nonh labour says the delay means the north has to pay the price for government failures . amber government failures. amber weather warnings for snow and are in place for parts of the uk until tomorrow , bringing with it until tomorrow, bringing with it a potential to life. blizzards are due to cause treacherous conditions overnight with 50 mile per hour winds and 40 centimetres of snow expected in

some central and northern areas. the met says power cuts and travel delays are likely the prime minister is aiming to strengthen with france on small boats in the english channel. rishi sunak meet french president macron in paris tomorrow to implement further measures to prevent illegal migrants crossing . it will be migrants crossing. it will be the first uk france summit in five years at least nine people have been killed after russia fired 81 missiles, including six hypersonic missiles across ukraine. the fresh wave of strikes cut power to the operation. nuclear power plant, europe's biggest, although it was later restored , the plant was later restored, the plant was later restored, the plant was running on emergency diesel generators for the sixth time to prevent a potentially catastrophic meltdown . the

catastrophic meltdown. the prince and princess of wales have praised the communities that are fundraising for those have been impacted by in turkey and syria . william and kate and syria. william and kate visited london community centre to speak to aid workers who back from the disaster zone . they from the disaster zone. they were joined by two schoolgirl alice who made her self origami cranes to raise funds for the appeal tv online and debbie plus radio. this is gb news. now it's back to patrick on dan wootton tonight . tonight. good evening . now the idea that good evening. now the idea that the british taxpayers should pay reparations for the slave trade is utter , utter nonsense. labour is utter, utter nonsense. labour clive lewis is calling for to send money to the caribbean to say sorry for the slave trade. in fact, he thinks we won't be

able move forward as a nation until do so. eddie now can hear the howls of those to reparations and apology which no british government has ever given. go to the and what you will see is the past alive and today. will see is the past alive and today . well this is just the today. well this is just the latest example of leftie woke word salad from people who want britain to hate itself . nobody britain to hate itself. nobody alive today should have to apologise to something that happened hundreds of years ago. look for a start. reparations already been paid between 1807 and 1860. the royal navy west africa squadron seized approximately 1600 ships involved in the slave and freed 150,000 africans who were aboard these vessels . i think actively these vessels. i think actively stopping the slave trade is a pretty good way of making amends for it. mean how far back do we with this stuff? maybe we fund reparations by claiming a few of our own from the vikings or the romans or the ottomans around

point two 5 million european christians were in the barbary slave trade . but we're not going slave trade. but we're not going to get any money for that. so it would have to be ordinary people in britain today who would pay. but how would that work? couldn't make everybody pay. because if we that would because if we did, that would include of. so include the descendants of. so we'd trace everyone we'd have to trace everyone family tree back and exclude anybody related somebody anybody is related to somebody who brought to britain who was brought to britain against their will or should probably exclude immigrant probably exclude any immigrant that we? that really shouldn't we? because no way they because there's no way that they could for britain's could be blamed for britain's historical so historical wrongs. okay, so let's just white people, that is it. well what people like me, i mean, i'm half greek cypriot and half irish, so all my pain for my ancestors was probably just peasants. shock, peasants. it's not a shock, really. it. all right, all right. it has to just be right. so it has to just be white people whose we can trace back having lived here. back to having lived here. hundreds of years when the hundreds of years ago when the slave was going on. but slave trade was going on. but actually now i think about it that poses a bit of a problem as because most of those people lived worked in appalling conditions and don't just take lived worked in appalling conwordis and don't just take lived worked in appalling

con word fornd don't just take lived worked in appalling con word for it. don't just take lived worked in appalling con word for it. earlieszt take lived worked in appalling con word for it. earlier on take my word for it. earlier on a chat with this chap hard chat with this chap cold hard facts for lewis are that the descendant of slaves living in the caribbean have a far better quality of life than they would have had if their ancestors had remained africa. because britain's caribbean possessions, unlike west africa, where the slaves come from, are now middle income countries. so the bahamas has a gdp per head , which is has a gdp per head, which is comparable to spain and italy , comparable to spain and italy, andifs comparable to spain and italy, and it's higher than portugal. okay. so those people that are always getting a bit ridiculous this point, i think, isn't it? and then of course, there is the question of whether or not it's the people living in the canbbean the people living in the caribbean today should really be getting reparations mean all getting the reparations mean all of serious of our lives today serious negatively a result negatively impacted as a result of historic slave trade . of the historic slave trade. isn't i spoke bit isn't the chap i spoke to a bit earlier today for the british earlier on today for the british taxpayer is going pay them he taxpayer is going to pay them he will have the vast majority of british people are descended british people who are descended from factory workers farmworkers, etc. whose conditions were very little better . the slaves, in fact in

better. the slaves, in fact in some worse . so after we track some worse. so after we track down maybe a few hundred people alive , britain today who it alive, britain today who it could just about be claimed as some debt a result of the slave trade. clive lewis mp would then want them to send money to the wrong place. now mr. lewis was of back in favour of a staying in the european union, which many regard as a protectionist racket that predominantly serves the majority white population of continental europe and puts barriers on trade with caribbean and african nations . so when and african nations. so when people say that british taxpayers should pay financial compensation for the slave trade, actually they are talking utter us utter rubbish. but to respond now is my superstar panel respond now is my superstar panel. i've got political commentator dominique samuels. i've got former conservative of london candidate shaun bailey and of course, the wonderful author and broadcaster , amy. author and broadcaster, amy. nick, how fantastic . right. nick, how fantastic. right. well, i will start with you, dominique. what do you reckon to what clive lewis said to say should be forking out? i just think it's really, really

embarrassing if you look think it's really, really enthe rassing if you look think it's really, really enthe context if you look think it's really, really enthe context of if you look think it's really, really enthe context of what's you look at the context of what's actually going on this actually going on in this country actually country now, what's actually impact getting everyone not just wiping apple but black people and other ethnic minorities included ? we're facing a cost of included? we're facing a cost of living crisis . we're facing living crisis. we're facing looming . sadiq khan wanting to looming. sadiq khan wanting to put everywhere and charge people for driving amongst many, many other things. and the thing that you to focus on is this age student union debate about reparations . it's really reparations. it's really embarrassing because most people and i say probably most black people are not crying and screaming about or sending reparations back to the terrible men in their day to day lives. they think it's a question of who do you get to really pay as well? so i want more down line and we want your views and all of that. i think these two things i picked up from what you said, reparations amongst canbbean said, reparations amongst caribbean people i'm of jamaican descent it's descent is conversation. it's popular. going a popular. so i'm going to get a big check list. let's get this done. mean, i think he done. i mean, but but i think he has go deeper because what

has to go deeper because what now saying, okay, if now people are saying, okay, if has to pay for slavery, what about everybody else for slavery? money go the slavery? does the money go the government? does go the government? does it go to the individual? it's all those questions well. the questions to ask. well. and the other deeper i think other the deeper thing, i think as comments about the as well his comments about the commonwealth i thought were offensive at least because he's saying are saying that these nations are fools around the fools for hanging around the a for years they've to for years but they've chosen to stay commonwealth. they stay in the commonwealth. they could leave it's could always leave and it's it annoys that thinks that he annoys me that he thinks that he and ilk are such geniuses and his ilk are such geniuses and his ilk are such geniuses and everybody in the and everybody else in the commonwealth is an idiot. but the is who the key thing here really is who and how is this going to be paid? and does actually help people on does it create people move on or does it create a element? it even a new element? is it even matter, though? i think that's the point. like, who cares? one's right one's thinking about this right now. think really does matter now. i think really does matter because a of because there is a lot of momentum caribbean for momentum in the caribbean for this happen because . i mean, this to happen because. i mean, you it's just a fact that you can't it's just a fact that british is based partly on the history of slavery. that is why we are the way we are today. similarly do you feel responsible for the slave ? me responsible for the slave? me personally, i think we have. i

think we have a collective responsibility as a nation to take responsibility for what happened. but the and i think that's what it is all like we benefit and we and we enjoy the wealth it created undeniably. that's just a fact. yet we don't want to take the response ability. well, i don't argue that it couldn't be that, like things like the industrial revolution, for example. i mean, people operating living people operating and living under conditions , know under shocking conditions, know in workhouses, etc. i mean the british people, i mean, realistically , the point. but realistically, the point. but i think if those people's descendants paying money for their three depends their about three depends depends what you doesn't it could pay , you know, just to say could pay, you know, just to say that everybody was poor and it's fine. we shouldn't do it because of that is one thing. but the deeperis of that is one thing. but the deeper is he made he made suggestions that we can't live on until. yeah i'm not sure that's true and i think, i think, i think, i think he runs the risk of causing another set of animosities. if you want to help . i said another, i said it help. i said another, i said it was the animosity. if you really want to help the caribbean

actually, it's about trade, it's about in those places, about respect in those places, the africa , what the caribbean and africa, what they is trade, not a they want is trade, not a handout. they'll beholden to both. that we can both. i'm not sure that we can keep saying now that how country we enjoy all of this wealth because we did hundreds because of what we did hundreds of ago because looking of years ago because looking around, i'm not seeing around, i'm not really seeing that there there are that there are there are individual and individual landowners and individual landowners and individual which have done great benefited over the slave trade such as unilever. they've never paid, but things like that made efforts to do that. i don't i know that some companies have, like lloyds , london in 2020, like lloyds, london in 2020, they actually paying reparations. and that reflects that. but can i just make this point i want to make? the fact is that we paid compensation to the owners the slave the slave owners the slave owners were financially compensated to the slaves compensated to get the slaves victims of , slavery and their victims of, slavery and their families were so that sure families never were so that sure what would would you what would what would you understand would you understand just what would you be willing to pay for that ? but be willing to pay for that? but again, it's not about the individual. it about the individual. it's about a collective. no, you know, let me say. me finish. let me go. say. let me finish. let me go. let me summation someone is

someone who potentially someone who would potentially benefit payment i'm of benefit from this payment i'm of jamaica descent me what would and would we be? you and what would we be? you wouldn't anything because wouldn't get anything because you britain many you live in britain so many things about the collective responsibility in effect on the nafion responsibility in effect on the nation the is the way it is because of slavery the way is we just there a clip from an individual who is saying as a historian who says that actually the caribbean countries person are better off financially . a are better off financially. a lot of the original african nafions lot of the original african nations with some of these people well from so if people well coming from so if clive was saying should clive lewis was saying we should be paying reparations to anyone, it be paying reparations to anyone, h been be paying reparations to anyone, it been the original it should have been the original african. gives african. surely this just gives these politicians excuse to these politicians an excuse to take what's take responsibility for what's going country. i think going in their country. i think the suggestion that is clive lewis suggest that he made lewis is an suggest that he made it wasn't even financial reparations just it. well reparations was just it. well it is change. hang on a is climate change. but hang on a minute . it was in to minute. it was invested in to the education system, the infrastructure. it wasn't keeping the money this week. the other thing i want to concentrate on as well was this idea of an apology, because

what's these families have apologised and go to amy's point they directly benefit, let them pay they directly benefit, let them pay unilever whatever companies. that's fine if they want it , that's fine if they want it, whatever you can make them pay because you could take that. but the thing would talk about is an apology because. as many people here, myself , dominique, here, such as myself, dominique, who those nations. so who came from those nations. so what do we apologise for gets well yeah what do you say to poor white working class people this didn't benefit all. and this didn't benefit at all. and when an apology, you when you ask for an apology, you start to generate animosity because lots of people because there's lots of people saying, have anything saying, i didn't have anything to it. the purpose of to do with it. is the purpose of this roots of it. it's this is the roots of it. it's about revenge and it's not really about how it's not what about like dragging, oh, it's just it's time to blame about fairness . well, i don't think it fairness. well, i don't think it is . okay. you can see it wasn't is. okay. you can see it wasn't because everybody there started talking about our role in the climate crisis. well, if that mp knew anything modern china completely wipes out anything we did here. one year of the industrial revolution and people scale what it is now. what i

really dislike people are using the historical pain of many black people in the world to get to push for their own political agenda. and that's what i dislike. if you want to talk about reparations, fine. but not like should we got reparations from people who descended from people were involved with people who were involved with the for 1.25 the barbary trade for 1.25 million european christian sold into slavery. you know , should into slavery. you know, should we be getting money off ? i think we be getting money off? i think the point is that if the slave owners have been compensated , owners have been compensated, then and their families still from that and there is still much of the land in the canbbeanis much of the land in the caribbean is owned by british, former slave owner families. that's what makes this difficult but then those countries should take if somebody owns land jamaica did you make the government can do with it if say any nation no children slave owners would just given loads of money and it was hahaha it was in a calculated economic decision . the economy of britain decision. the economy of britain at the time would have suffered as a result. so it's not just the you couldn't it was you

could offend to be the british government wanted to enslave free and it cost them and still did it imagine you could something for free that's not as big as. yes i've having to go through pain of course i get through the pain of course i get it. you don't you don't want to give those people benefit, save money. the money. right? then that time the british order get british took a kick in order get slavery ended . the royal navy. slavery ended. the royal navy. the royal navy . i wouldn't the royal navy. i wouldn't excuse. i'm the descendant slaves. but if all navy sailed round freeing slaves so that i did because they paid money to these people, it was them like having a hero is not true. so why at that point were those people not compensated adequately? had a bike and adequately? if i had a bike and you stole it, you give it back to me, wouldn't you? well, there's probably racism. yeah so we have an opportunity to make it right. okay what? so this it right. okay so what? so this is. is look, this is an is. this is look, this is an important question. it's, i think worth asking, right? are you over historical racism ? yes. you over historical racism? yes. my you over historical racism? yes. my you know how you do that help those nations properly, make them part of the world scene. and i'll be satisfied that. no, no , you're is pay them

no, you're saying is pay them reparations owe you reparations so they owe you again. to of what's again. what to make of what's africa wants be the world africa wants is be on the world stage. else won't be stage. anybody else won't be treated respect. and then treated with respect. and then when want to trade look when they want to trade look according to be fair, according to you, to be fair, you know, over historical racism, don't know, your racism, i don't know, your system just needed you. i mean, i do. i think if they were i don't do. i think if they were racist, do you still feel racist, do you do you still feel guilt think when you guilt for that? i think when you look it like in america, from look at it like in america, from north south where slavery was north to south where slavery was abolished, that completely correlates unemployment correlates with unemployment rates african—american. correlates with unemployment rates african—american . now, rates in african—american. now, the effects of slavery are now. so but we're not talking about countries. you're talking about britain had an entirely britain that had an entirely different to the different relationship to the world entirely american slavery was later lost. it longer later into history and the british relationship with say is completely different to it was bigger it was wider it was more industrialised but they paid to end it in a way that americans. so comparing us to something thatis so comparing us to something that is not comparable isn't fair that's my having fair and that's my point having an isn't because an argument that isn't because people want to for politically today final words you're quite

lucky theoretically to get involved. i'm you're involved. no i'm done. you're out. out. you're done. out. you're out. you're done. right. tell you what. right. fine. i'll tell you what. we're an obviously we're off to an obviously finalised so . all right look finalised so. all right look coming footballer coming up england footballer legend still to legend malassezia is still to come and with suella braverman accusing lineker of accusing gary lineker of diminishing holocaust. accusing gary lineker of diminishing holocaust . we're diminishing the holocaust. we're asking the bbc's impartiality asking if the bbc's impartiality are now dead in water. but up next in the clash , when people next in the clash, when people smugglers are reportedly charging £7,000 for a cross—channel speedboat or economic migrants playing britain's lenient asylum system. ukip leader neil hamilton head to head with a show of card and thatis to head with a show of card and that is after the break. but let us know, you think as well. email us down at gbnews.uk or tweet using the handle gb news. there's also a poll up that you can vote right now .

and it's time now for the clash . in a brazen act of criminality, people smuggling, gangs now advertising, speedboat trips across the english channel to illegal migrants who can fork out £7,000 for the pleasure . out £7,000 for the pleasure. adverts flogging the vip trips have appeared on tik tok, boasting that the swift service takes just 45 minutes from the french coast and the gang's speedboat takes 12 people at a time and is less likely to be detected than traditional rubber dinghies. so with so called refugees somehow able to afford

£7,000 speedboat trips across the channel is the truth that economic are gaming or leaning into asylum systems. send us your opinions at gbnews.uk. tweet me gb news. there is also a poll running there which you can vote in right now and i'll bnng can vote in right now and i'll bring you those results very shortly. but doing battle this tonight, it's former conservative mp and current ukip leader neil hamilton and human rights shoaib khan. neil, rights lawyer shoaib khan. neil, thank you very much joining us as well as your show. but of course, neil, how are the refugees affording? £7,000 trips to britain when they're supposed to britain when they're supposed to quite poor? are they ? well to be quite poor? are they? well this is a racket, isn't it? overwhelmingly these people are economic , not genuine , from economic, not genuine, from persecuted , whether it's persecuted, whether it's political, racial or whatever. and as you say, the fact they can afford to pay these outrage , gorgeous sums for this trip across the channel, i think is a pointer to the reality here. you know, 98% of the people who

arrive on these boats have destroyed their documentation identifying , their nationality identifying, their nationality and where they've come from, the 70% of them are adult males between 18 and 39 years . old and between 18 and 39 years. old and 83% of them immediately make asylum claims. so are the numbers are now really out of control because since 2018, you know, we had 140,000 illegal migrants that were detected because . they're matches that because. they're matches that are not detected , 140,000. and are not detected, 140,000. and last year there was 52,001 year alone. and we've had thousand already in the run up to this year when the weather has been awful in the channel. so you know, we've got to put a stop to this because it undermines the entire of migration control and it's very unfair to the genuine refugees, of course, who are the real victims. i'll come back to you. i'll come back to because i want to bring show a bit of show. but are you really going

to look the nation in the eye now and? tell them that someone who's just paid £7,000 to get a nifty speedboat across the channel the victim of modern channel is the victim of modem or deserves a lot of sympathy . i or deserves a lot of sympathy. i just don't understand. i mean, the of this question and when you start you know saying you know refugees are supposed to be poon know refugees are supposed to be poor. why who said that's the whole economic whole point and not economic they're not to earn they're not coming to earn they're not coming to earn they're not coming here because they're not coming here because they don't have to eat. they don't have food to eat. they're coming because they're coming here because they're persecuted. i they're being persecuted. i mean, what in ukraine mean, what we saw in ukraine millionaires and someone on homeless people were treated the same. we in afghanistan same. what we saw in afghanistan , be kings of the , you could be kings of the asylum seekers, but you've asylum seekers, but if you've got £7,000, so if you've got £7,000, okay , you can probably £7,000, okay, you can probably put down the deposit for at least a couple of month's rent in a very country like france where they're coming from. so realistically , why on earth realistically, why on earth should we have much sympathy should we have too much sympathy if over here and? if they're coming over here and? want to coin off the british? because that's something to do with it. that's the whole point. they have the money. tell me

about, professionals. this journalist. there's journalist. academics. there's tv presenters. i mean, all sorts of people are refugees. they're sportspeople and that's the whole point. and they're not coming in because they want money and they have no food to eat. they're coming here save eat. they're coming here to save their for a story their lives. now for a story that impossible to you that might be impossible to you know, only spend know, you would only spend thousands if you're thousands of pounds if you're going thousands pounds going to get thousands of pounds back other person. back by any other person. i don't think that's fair. i'm sorry. i i don't think that's that's that's fair. the key points difference there would points of difference there would surely you've got surely be that if you've got that money you that amounts of money and you want choosing to use that amount of money to britain that of money to come to britain that needi of money to come to britain that need i would would need i would argue would definitely make an economic definitely make you an economic migrant. oh no, no . yeah. migrant. yeah oh no, no. yeah. well what we have to ask ourselves about these people is why have they not claimed asylum in the first country that they came to inside the european union in of these people are entering the european union either at the greek border or come through the balkans or maybe a few of them come via italy from , north africa, and italy from, north africa, and they come through other european

countries which are perfectly safe, including alban near where of course, tens of thousands of bogus asylum seekers have tried to get into this country in recent. why have they not claimed asylum in those countries rather than making their all the way to the their way all the way to the channel order to try and get into britain? that you know, the international law says that you have to asylum in the very first safe country to which you come and that isn't happening here. so is racket pure and so this is a racket pure and simple and people like mr. khan, the accomplices of the people smugglers and the gangs , who smugglers and the gangs, who then, of course, very often keep these people in a kind modern slavery, forcing them to work in illegal activities when they do get into this country to repay the costs of their journey? because a of them are not paying up front, they're actually taking on responsibilities to pay taking on responsibilities to pay afterwards. well i'll let you come back to show neal where i was basically said that you are in some way an accomplice to the people who are coming across the people who are coming across

the channel views on that. the channel your views on that. i think that's really i don't think that's really worthy comment. i mean, i'm a lawyer. a member of a very lawyer. i'm a member of a very respectable question the uk respectable question in the uk and also seemed dignify and you also seemed to dignify the office grammatically well, but but what going to say but but what i'm going to say firstly what says the firstly what he says about the law is incorrect and that's the whole it's myth that whole point. it's a myth that there's a legal obligation to claim asylum in the first country, is not. so country, but clearly is not. so that's thing that says that's one thing that says what the doesn't. again, i do the law doesn't. again, i do i do get that. can i ask you do get that. can i can i ask you this is why should the british, for many of whom many people watching now will not have watching this now will not have £7,000 in their savings? okay. that lot of why that is a lot of money. why should the british taxpayer pay for people who've just forked out seven grand to get a speedboat across, the channel to stay free at the taxpayers expense in this country? and i have to tell bad and bold and then probably in some kind of council house as well, and other kids, etc. could you kids, educated, etc. could you just explain to the british taxpayer they should do that taxpayer why they should do that ? because it just shows the opposite of mr. hammond kind of saying others are

saying and the others are saying. exactly shows that saying. it exactly shows that they are genuine refugees trying to economic to save life and not economic migrants . and that's whole migrants. and that's the whole point they have the money, point that they have the money, they resources, but they have the resources, but they just need to save face and no one's coming here for the hotels. them up no hotels. we put them up and no one's up for. the £40 one's coming up for. the £40 a week we give them, no one's coming here, i mean, for these things that's just such things and that's just such a myth. that's the thing myth. and that's the thing i know nothing about. do they know nothing about. why do they all don't. very all come? they don't. a very tiny minority. most afghans did go pakistan. most of people go to pakistan. most of people do seek asylum in their closest countries. most ukrainians would have gone to neighbouring safe . have gone to neighbouring safe. it's a small minority comes to the uk and just like any we need to take our share. neil one more from egham . there are 52,000 of from egham. there are 52,000 of these illegal migrants who paddled across the channel last year their lives are not at risk in france is the country from which they're coming to the united. why don't they make their asylum claim in france? well, you why, because well, i'll tell you why, because in france, 25% of these asylum claims because bogus are rejected but unfortunate partly

because we no longer have a home office which is fit for purpose . 72% of their claims office which is fit for purpose .72% of their claims in britain are granted. so, of course this is a great pull factor for migrants who don't have a right to claim asylum, but they think that the british system can be gamed, whereas the french system is more difficult and so we should wise up . you know, the should wise up. you know, the party of leftie lawyers who are making lots of money out of asylum claims and it's a massive business this costing us billions. taxpayers of this country, billions of pounds a year , which could be better year, which could be better spent on the health service and many other good things. you know, it's a racket and got know, it's a racket and it's got to stopped. can i ask you, to be stopped. so can i ask you, your esteemed legal view? okay, is it legal possible for somebody be classed as an economic migrant if they come across channel? because i wonder whether or not you are only behind us a little bit. and actually the reality, if they've just come on a small boat they can't legally be classed an economic migrant, which is why you now in national you can now in national television they're not i'm

television that they're not i'm not sure what you mean by that there's no legal definition why migrant ? i'm there's no legal definition why migrant? i'm sorry, are you talking to me, patrick no, mr. khan , i'm talking to mr. khan. khan, i'm talking to mr. khan. so if can they legally? because if they come across the channel in a dinghy i and so first thing the thing is i mean obviously economic migrant is not yet known to law or to immigration law. so that's something right wing people usually the media try to it . so that's not try to say it. so that's not really something. don't know really something. i don't know what either. come what that means either. come here, because do. this here, because you do. but this is thing. you do know what is the thing. you do know what you do what does it mean? you do know? what does it mean? i met. all right. you do know it means what i suspect that you're doing is hiding behind legal terminology , which means that terminology, which means that you can these people are not you can say these people are not migrants isn't migrants because there isn't a term law defines one term in law that defines one economic is even though economic migrant is even though i anyone with a brain will i think anyone with a brain will be able to say an migrant is probably the type of person got seven grand in cash to pay a people get a boat people smuggler to get on a boat to to britain with the to come to britain with the purpose a job purpose getting a job and reaping the of a better reaping the benefits of a better economic situation. it so

firstly mean you asked for my legal opinion which is i was saying that's a tabloid term, not a term. but secondly, what asking i think that this proves the point that's the point these people money not people have money they're not coming the money if coming here for the money if they were coming in the they were coming in for the money just invest money they would just invest 7000 somewhere and start a business on 7000 in the uk is a huge amount in those countries. so not coming here for so they're not coming here for the money. that's the the money. that's exactly the point. the money, have point. they have the money, have the they're the resources. they're professionals financially well—off. just need to save well—off. they just need to save their lives . okay? both we both their lives. okay? both we both of thank you very much. we of you, thank you very much. we could continue this discussion all evening, but unfortunately, we facilities. we don't have. the facilities. thank as thank you very much. as conservative conservative thank you very much. as conservecurrent conservative thank you very much. as conservecurrent ukiponservative thank you very much. as conservecurrent ukip ,nservative thank you very much. as conservecurrent ukip , neilative mp and current ukip, neil hamilton human rights lawyer hamilton and human rights lawyer khan. you agree with khan. so who do you agree with our economic gaming, our lenient asylum system, given these tick tock clips the way can i just say it's fascinating here gb news and other news outlets as well. you can just see the tick on clips online. you can base italy, find out where some of the people who to be, the people

smugglers live. but it does appear that our police force are not to do that. i find that out anyway. kevin twitter sighs. yes, if they are so desperate, where do they get the £7,000 from to these smugglers? from to pay these smugglers? caron it is laughable caron email says it is laughable these poor desperate people these poor and desperate people managed seven managed to get seven kate together fund criminality . together to fund criminality. sean on twitter says without it down asylum system has been down so asylum system has been too this is a too for years and this is a paradise for economic. too for years and this is a paradise for economic . well now paradise for economic. well now your verdict is in. and gentlemen, we had our twitter poll done. we and 95% of you agree that economic migrants are gaming our lenient asylum system. 5% of you think that they are right. okay. well, coming up in big woody style with french president macron threatening to block migrant belt, can we really trust the french former tory minister widdecombe has her say 50. but first, as to whether president bbc bad boy gary lineker comments offensive . is it time comments offensive. is it time to defund the baby? former england footballer matt letissier gives his experts opinion not just on the but on

gary lineker as well. that should be interesting. that's coming. your in a matter of seconds .

well the jewish communities least favourite face the press pack on his £4 million london doorstep this morning but typically smug gary lineker was in no mood to retract his vile jibe . i either the bbc gary

in no mood to retract his vile jibe. i either the bbc gary i'm always to of direct general saying yes he said he said we have to chat which after well he may be proud of his comments in recent days in which he compared the tory policies migrant plans to those of but home secretary as well the problem certainly hasn't seen the side from hasn't seen the funny side from a point of view. to a personal point of view. to hear that kind of characterisation john is offensive, you know, to kind of throw throw out those kind of flippant analogies diminishes it diminishes the unspeakable tragedy that millions people went through. and i don't think anything that is happening in the uk today can come close to what happens in the holocaust. so i find it really lazy and on comparison , well, gary looks comparison, well, gary looks likely to somehow cling on to

his £1.35 million a year contract, but joining me now is another former footballer who knows just what it is like to cancelled former southampton star and england international, matt . matt, star and england international, matt. matt, thank you very much joining us. does the bbc's refusal to discipline lineker make a mockery out of their impartiality guidelines do you think and should we just defund it ? well that's two interesting it? well that's two interesting points. firstly, i think you'd have to see what gary lineker contract was to see if he is bound by those impartial guidelines and if he is , then guidelines and if he is, then he's clearly breached them . if he's clearly breached them. if he's clearly breached them. if he isn't, then play. i'm all for freedom of speech, as you know . freedom of speech, as you know. i'm a very big advocate . that i'm a very big advocate. that and if gary's contract , i'm a very big advocate. that and if gary's contract, he's i'm a very big advocate. that and if gary's contract , he's not and if gary's contract, he's not bound by those rules, then he's entitled to his opinion and. yes, some people might find that offensive . but i think in this offensive. but i think in this country , we have understand that country, we have understand that sometimes having that freedom of speech means , you are going to

speech means, you are going to be offended. sometimes and it doesn't mean it's going to be everyone they get that says something slightly controversial gets cancelled. i don't agree with that know i've been on the receiving end of that so be a hypocrite to sit here and say yes, gary lineker should be cancelled. i think it all comes to down what is in his what is in his contract basically. but the interesting thing about gary is that he's also then said that he's going to continue to speak out for those without a voice . out for those without a voice. so perhaps that means he's going to speak out for the vaccine engine in this country who don't get their voices heard , but get their voices heard, but unfortunately be allowed unfortunately won't be allowed to that really because ofcom to do that really because ofcom won't allow any stories that may promote vaccine hesitancy on air as gb news has found out . i as gb news has found out. i mean, when did ofcom , a mean, when did ofcom, a cheerleader for the big pharma ? cheerleader for the big pharma? that's what i'd like to know. it's not their place to suppress true stories . it's their job to true stories. it's their job to make sure that channels are impartial and, balanced. and

thatis impartial and, balanced. and that is a job which are failing at incredibly badly because the bbc is the least impartial outlet on the planet. they are so left leaning. it's incredible . and your other part, the question was, should they be defunded 100? they should be they should be going to a subscript based model and. they should then be able to stand their own two feet. and if enough people want to pay to listen to their propaganda then let them carry on. do you think we'll probably away with it? because as you as you were alluding there, he's kind of picked a topic that a lot of people would think he's very left wing and therefore is more likely get away with it and potentially , i think you were potentially, i think you were alluding to as well, institutional bias at the bbc might mean that they don't quite understand how biased he is, if that makes sense . yeah i think that makes sense. yeah i think when the whole when the whole set up is, is that far to the left they're not going to see

anything rolling gary's comments now certainly you'll see a very different way that gary has been by his employer to perhaps the way that i was treated, the way i was treated by my. and that is showing incredible amount of bias . and there's no two ways bias. and there's no two ways about it. and that's not how television should be. how do you feel about the idea ? gary feel about the idea? gary lineker holds himself up to be an incredibly virtuous, nice , an incredibly virtuous, nice, loving human being . and i don't loving human being. and i don't know whether or not that's necessarily true . i know that's necessarily true. i know that's not necessarily true . quite not necessarily true. quite frankly, from a lot of people that i've spoken to, i've had with gary have a lot to do with gary having a lot to with him. but i know a lot of people that have had a lot to do with him in. quite close circles will tell you the complete opposite.

and you know, i think he's in a position there where he feels very i think, to speak about he can because he feels protected by those around him. and i think that has just proven again with that has just proven again with that with what's happened today or this week. so i mean, without necessarily going into too many specifics, he would you maybe urge to a little bit urge people to be a little bit cautious about thinking that gary . i can tell you, gary is a saint. i can tell you, gary is a saint. i can tell you, gary lineker is no saint, not in any shape or form. and there's very few of us that are saying, i'm not, you know , i'm no saint. i'm not, you know, i'm no saint. we've all made mistakes in our lives, but we don't all virtue signal to the extent that mr. lineker does and yes, i would imagine there are of quite a few skeletons that have to imagine. there are quite a few skeletons in gary's closet down the years that he's obviously got some friends in very high places who have protected if . there's no have protected if. there's no there's no two ways about that. well you watch the match of the

day at the weekend . not if i can day at the weekend. not if i can help now. it depends . it depends help now. it depends. it depends if i'm to win or not. so you won't . or i'm proud of. thank won't. or i'm proud of. thank i swear. very kind. you're right. we're playing to get somebody, not it away from home. so you're probably. right. yeah. well, you got i've obviously i've obviously know in as well obviously know in fact as well as that. there we go. yes. thank you very very much. and of course, important to say as well, here well, gary lineker is not here to defend that was matt to defend himself. that was matt letizia. thank you very, very much. up in much. right. okay. coming up in the buzz the launching the buzz with the pm launching review education in review into sex education in schools the activist schools has left the activist embroiled in appropriate content into the before kids are ready my superstar panel tackle this class the first of tomorrow's front pages that's just off the tan button next one of the moments, one of the many babies will waiting for in fake will be waiting for in fake woody former minister woody style, former minister widdicombe asks, if can truly widdicombe asks, if we can truly trust the french as political allies. maybe it's all other now after reports emerge that president will block the president macron will block the uk's awaited migrants.

uk's long awaited migrants. she's right back here after this very, very short break. don't you dare

time now for big woody style and it seems the pm is facing a new hurdle in protecting our borders because the french president , because the french president, emmanuel macron, is set to reject any demands for a reserves agreement . so cheers, reserves agreement. so cheers, emmanuel. that's according to french government sources. macron will himself demand a multi settlement to put british boots the ground on french beachesin boots the ground on french beaches in order to stop illegal people smugglers in their tracks andifs people smugglers in their tracks and it's expected the sunak will agree to macron's request. dufing agree to macron's request. during his summit in paris tomorrow as , he tries to repair tomorrow as, he tries to repair relations between number 10 and the elysee . following years of the elysee. following years of tension but more to come joins now i believe. yes there we. thank you very much. and look , thank you very much. and look, should we be agreeing to pay the french kind of multi—million pound deal so that we can try to

protect our own borders? what do you think ? i mean, they used to you think? i mean, they used to me that our government never learned anything. we have france, a large bunch of money in the past. nothing happened . in the past. nothing happened. we gave them another large tranche of money instead of saying, you know, that's the waste of time. nothing happened. now we're going to give them another tranche of money. i mean, rishi sunak quite , mean, rishi sunak quite, honestly, i don't know what. he thinks he is doing now. the french are not going to accept all returns. they can't actually block the bill. we, the parliament. but the problem is when we then come to return people to france, because that was a safe country and that's where they come from. he is to apparently refuse to take them back. apparently refuse to take them back . now, as apparently refuse to take them back. now, as as i'm concerned, fine . what we have to do is fine. what we have to do is deter them from coming in the first place. that is, you all and end all of this. first place. that is, you all and end all of this . and and end all of this. and therefore, what we should be

doing, detaining all new asylum seekers , everybody who gets off seekers, everybody who gets off the boats , insecure the boats, insecure accommodation. while we process their claims and then we send them back to france we send them back either to the country that they from or to other safe country that is prepared to accept them, such as rwanda. but surely , for the amount of money surely, for the amount of money that rishi sunak is almost definitely just going to sign up to emmanuel. what we could do is , build another asylum, type court and stock that full of lawyers and judges. it and make very, very swift and then put people on to a variety of different countries . one of different countries. one of those countries may well be rwanda. wouldn't that just save as many? well, it would save us money. it would fund a lot of detention facility , which is detention facility, which is what we need. all need. and this is a deterrent. if people know that if they come to, they're going to be detained, they're going to be detained, they're going to be dealt with swiftly,

they're to be sent home they're going to be sent home because not sending because you're not sending genuine refugees or sending genuine refugees only or sending people countries that are not people to countries that are not persecuting them . and if people persecuting them. and if people know that, that is what is going to happen , it doesn't become to happen, it doesn't become worse . having a to happen, it doesn't become worse. having a human trafficking agent or . now we can trafficking agent or. now we can see what france is about. i mean, france has got them off the side of this are all these refugees should be applying for asylum in france because they are in a safe country but they're not doing it in france . they're not doing it in france. just laughs while they come over here. yeah. am but some people are saying in various different media reports that when we were a member of the eu it would have been easier for us to have a return agreement. and now we're outside the eu, we're going cap in it quite that in hand. well, it is quite that in hand. well, it is quite that in the eu we have the dublin convention . we allegedly convention. we allegedly backtrack allegedly could have sent people back . how many did sent people back. how many did we send back to france then? under that? no, no , it was

under that? no, no, it was derisory because the convention may have been there, but the receiving countries to receive, as macron clearly then it doesn't make iota of difference. theidea doesn't make iota of difference. the idea that we sending people in droves under the dublin absolute rot . okay. so rishi absolute rot. okay. so rishi sunak goes and meets emmanuel . sunak goes and meets emmanuel. what should he say to him? because think the british public will be i think, rightly annoyed at the idea of emmanuel macron basically taking us for a financial . basically taking us for a financial. it's a basically taking us for a financial . it's a little bit financial. it's a little bit like you know someone knocks on an person's door and tries to sell them a conservatory they don't need . then they build a don't need. then they build a conservatory in the roof falls off and then that person keeps going back to the same person again to try and get replaced. i mean, it's not going to work. so why on would you see want why on earth would you see want to macron he wants? to give macron what he wants? i on to stand. why rishi sunak he does half what he does anyway. i mean he's already tried to sell

us a total failure of a northern ireland agreement, one that could cause an awful lot of trouble in the future, despite fact that he voted brexit, he's to want the whole time to fall through the eu and to let them continue interfere in our affairs. now, you should say to macron, you've already had of money from us. when you show a result from that, then maybe we'll give you some more. otherwise nothing doing . why otherwise nothing doing. why can't he say that? why can't britain stand up for itself? yeah.i britain stand up for itself? yeah. i mean, we all know what's about to happen, right? which is that rishi sunak is probably going give emmanuel macron a load of money. the boats are going to keep on coming. and then as and we try to then as and when we try to deport anybody or fly them to rwanda, anything like that, people emmanuel people like emmanuel macron are going to are an going to say to us, you are an honourable little, evil country and , at what point do and actually, at what point do we just have to say we don't what you think anymore? emmanuel well, that point long ago , but well, that point long ago, but we don't appear to have any

prime ministers who are willing to stand up to macron to stand up on the line, to stand up the eu. we don't appear to have any body with any fibre representing this country . okay. alright this country. okay. alright well, look and thank you very, very much as ever, that was a wonderful . and whitaker, former wonderful. and whitaker, former conservative minister with big witty style, wry . i've got loads witty style, wry. i've got loads coming your way ladies gentlemen. including angela levin , who will be live with me levin, who will be live with me in the studio. now bear in mind, the last time that andrew i love him was with us, there was a little bit of a scrap involving her and nina minkoff and they escalated and spilled out into the green room. just put this the green room. just put it this way, back and nina has way, angela back and nina has not been seen since, she's not been seen since, but she's going whether or not going to tell us whether or not she that harry and she thinks that harry and decision bestow titles decision to bestow royal titles on their is the height on their children is the height of hypocrisy. also after inappropriate sex education, lessons in british schools forced the government into a review as the last push for

progression polluted our classrooms with filth , state classrooms with filth, state chair .

while it's very nearly 10 pm. on patrick christys on tonight's hours, gary lineker shamefully compares the government's immigration policy to the. a british teenager fought for his life after being stabbed in the back, an iraqi migrant and stuck . so after the bbc confirmed won't take disciplinary action against a loud mouth lineker. all of the endorsing a dangerous hard left border policy. fleet icon kelvin mackenzie cancelled on that later this hour plus as bombshell reports claim the palace expects the sussexes to attend the coronation . prince attend the coronation. prince harry's biographer, angela levin, explains why she thinks harry and meghan are using their children as political pole ins by giving them prince and princess. don't miss angela. typically analysis on the latest

sussex drama and it's usually the virtue signalling events of yeah the virtue signalling events of year. but as the oscars decline line president zelenskyy's request to all day for once keeping politics separate from lovers. or is it a slight on the ukrainian people? that's the big debate with my superstar panel . debate with my superstar panel. and tonight, i'm joined dominique samuels , joe bailey dominique samuels, joe bailey and amy cow. the ways we're better in the first hour. but i would go and tory mp miriam cates alert the communist the twisted teaching being done schools graphic on oral sex how to choke your partner safely and 72 genders. this is what passes for relationships and sex education in british schools . education in british schools. kids really need to be taught to choke that power in a safe way anyway. has left wing activism , anyway. has left wing activism, sex education, lessons and our children's mine. sex education, lessons and our children's mine . plus eurovision children's mine. plus eurovision is heading to liverpool in may. but does my mother have a hit with the uk entry? could i write a song ? i feel much better now

a song? i feel much better now now . we'll know . both those now. we'll know. both those stories are coming up next in the media. and finally, according to the independent trans comic jordynne , the 13th trans comic jordynne, the 13th most influential woman for doing this . i'm most influential woman for doing this. i'm just sayin, if i did die in a park, be arrested. would not anybody say. but will they be on it again? in tonight's greatest britain or union jackass? you will also have to get the front pages right as they drop and. that will be coming your way after the news headlines. now with rory smith . hello, i'm rory rory smith. hello, i'm rory smith in gb newsroom we start with some breaking news in the last few minutes . at least six last few minutes. at least six people have been killed and several more injured after a

shooting in the northern german city of hamburg . it comes as city of hamburg. it comes as police said , a tweet that police said, a tweet that a large scale operation was underway in the ulster dorf area . local media report, the are on the run with emergency services and doctors at the scene . we'll and doctors at the scene. we'll bnng and doctors at the scene. we'll bring you more on that as have it amber weather warnings for snow and ice in place for parts of the uk bringing with it a potent risk to life . blizzard potent risk to life. blizzard sorry to cause conditions overnight with 50 mile per hour winds and 40 centimetres of snow expected in some central northern areas . the met office northern areas. the met office says power cuts and travel delays are likely . gary lineker delays are likely. gary lineker has been accused of diminishing the tragedy of the holocaust with the home secretary saying she find his comments offensive . the bbc presenter is under

fire for comparing the government's language around its new immigration policy to used by germany in the 1930s. he has the fall out as ridiculous out of proportion. culture secretary lucy frazer , the commons. the lucy frazer, the commons. the broadcaster , remain impartial as broadcaster, remain impartial as somebody who's grandmother escaped germany in the 1930s. i think it's really and inappropriate to compare government policy on immigration events on immigration to events in germany in the 1930s. that it's important for the bbc to maintain impartiality if it is to retain the trust of the pubuc to retain the trust of the public who pay the licence fee . public who pay the licence fee. the transport secretary says construction of hitches to between birmingham and crewe will be delayed by two years. mark harper says that is due to increased costs and significa

and inflationary pressure. but shadow transport secretary louise hague says the delay means the north has to pay the price for government failures . price for government failures. it's frankly hs2 is one of the biggest construction projects europe. tens of thousands of rely on it as well as thousands of businesses across the country . the tories crushed the economy last year and now once again they're asking the north to pay they're asking the north to pay the price for that terrible failures. frankly, the idea that this will save costs is completely disingenuous. this will save costs is completely disingenuous . at completely disingenuous. at least nine people have been killed after fired 81 missiles, including six hypersonic missiles across . ukraine. the missiles across. ukraine. the fresh wave strikes cut power to operation nuclear power plant europe's biggest. although it was restored. the plant was running on emergency diesel generators for the sixth time to

prevent potentially catastrophic . tv online and dab radio. this is gb news. now it's back to patrick on dan dan wootton tonight. tomorrow's news tonight now in media buzz . tomorrow's news tonight now in media buzz. let's kick tomorrow's news tonight now in media buzz . let's kick off with media buzz. let's kick off with the first look at the front pages. hot the press and we're going to the metro because they lead with our look will, run out only look has so far stopped a disaster at europe's biggest nuclear power plant in war torn ukraine. that's according to a ukrainian chief. suspected russian smashed. it's out of action for a sixth time and fears are growing that any future strikes could spark a meltdown. the metro, we're going to have to the eye now. and they lead with news that large of hs2

are set to be delayed by more than two years as the government bids to save money on the spiralling . you could literally spiralling. you could literally by the way just walk to crewe and not time anyway. senior tories have called the delays a great disappointment yeah. meanwhile the taxpayers crying the star leaves with the headune the star leaves with the headline prince charmless as after spending three years moaning about his life as a royal prince, how he now chooses to use royal titles for his children . yes, good stuff that children. yes, good stuff that from the start . anyway, my from the start. anyway, my superstar panel are back with me . i've political commentator . i've got political commentator dominique samuels. i've got former conservative of london candidates shaun bailey. and i've also got author broadcaster amy that equal. right. okay. so breaking tonight, ladies and gentlemen, the head of the school's ofsted, amanda spielman has warned that children are being taught sex education lessons that have no basis in any reputable scientific biological explanation , which biological explanation, which will probably be a problem if it is actually being taught to kids, which it is. it comes after mp parris raised the alarm

over lessons taught on 100 genders and instructions on how to do oral and apparently even how to choke your partner safely. they're just kids. downing telegraph this weekend revealed some schools have been warping the minds of youngsters with exactly this . rishi sunak with exactly this. rishi sunak has now pledged clamp down on the depravity the pm has ordered an urgent review of sex education. light of this wall revelations and pledged to clean up the filth in our classrooms. tory mp miriam cates led the charge of concerned mp in parliament by disturbingly revealing. some kids are. as i've just said, they're being taught how to choke their partners safely versus graphic lessons on oral sex how to choke your partner safely and 72 genders. this is what passes for relationships and sex education in british schools across the country, children are being subjected to lessons that are age inappropriate , extreme, age inappropriate, extreme, sexualising and inaccurate. well am i right? honourable friend

honour has commitments to end inappropriate education by commissioning independent inquiry into nature and extent of this safeguarding scandal. as a result of all of, we are bringing forward a review of our shc statute street guidance and will consult and we'll start our consultation as soon as possible . well night. miriam cates warned the department education guidance produced in 2019 with the help of the lgbt stonewall, had allowed acts of these groups to influence teaching in schools. so i'll start with you. dominic has left the activism field this inappropriate content our classrooms 100. and the government i think has completely capitulated and just lost in all of this, which is why so much of this madness is going . now, it's funny, you were going. now, it's funny, you were actually talking about this, because later today i got a really weird , really concerning really weird, really concerning and this was from a parent a concerned parent that said her five year old daughter came home from school yesterday explaining

they were taught to give massages during an english lesson . the pupil who's lesson. the pupil who's performing the massage must first say, can i touch , please first say, can i touch, please or please, can i touch you now? this is a year one pupil. and these some of the weird concerning things are actually going on in our schools . i concerning things are actually going on in our schools. i think teachers are taking a really inappropriate place in terms of controlling these sorts of important conversations that really should be reserved for the parents. so do you think in terms of that, that. i agree with you, that is really weird. but do you think what might have happenedis but do you think what might have happened is , something that's happened is, something that's going on in way in schools going on in a way in schools context, which is teachers think they're good thing they're trying to do good thing about being about consent and being inclusive and all of this and the obviously the reality, amy, is obviously they up. sometimes they just mess up. sometimes they just mess up. sometimes they up being they ends up being deeply inappropriate we don't inappropriate. and we also don't know information was know how that information was relayed that parent relayed to that parent perception of that parent and how they interpreted it themselves. think a, with themselves. so i think a, with themselves. so i think a, with the people about all our education in the uk is that has

be put on report to the parents board . the parent can access any board. the parent can access any time so you could see exactly what your child is learning and the fact that this is urgently being reviewed when it was due being reviewed when it was due be so he's just be reviewed anyway so he's just changing the language around it. the that if anything is the fact is that if anything is polluting minds children polluting the minds of children at moment, it is 100% which at the moment, it is 100% which is why rc practitioners have had to change the way that they teach to slightly more . what you teach to slightly more. what you call, i don't know , 3 hours call, i don't know, 3 hours content with that graphic content with that graphic content because unfortunately that's what children see. 93% of 11 year olds have seen . your 11 year olds have seen. your child if they're over 11, has probably seen. so that to be described in age appropriate way so that they don't use it in later life and. if we talk about the adults, the parents, thirds of women who are sexually active at the moment have been choked consent because all of that is true. but then again, when you're actually looking at who

they're having these conversations, a lot of the time, it also includes primary school pupils. no it's all let's . you just come on that because no primary school child is not true about . joking. that's not true about. joking. that's not true. how how you come on, sean trump is missing the fact that this is so lots of people will be seen a slightly different interpretation of what's going on. so you can't categoric you say it's not being taught to primary school children. the problem we have here is over of our children and amy is 100% right. is the devil here. but the response of education department has been muddled . it department has been muddled. it has been influenced by groups with absolutely no balance at all. and it's led to the fact that we are now confusing our children, teachers and in the defence of teachers. teachers are afraid speak out because if they look at something well this is inappropriate. i came for the department of education. they they removed from their they get removed from their jobs, get vilified as jobs, they get vilified as things being detached from reality. miriam said

reality. what miriam kate said state detached from what was state was detached from what was the 73 gender thing was based on an anecdote in a tabloid newspaper the choking was based on a sex positive , which was on a sex positive, which was never which was never in the parents names that were accurate was yes 14 to 19 year olds. they are taught about oral sex. they are taught about oral sex. they are taught about other forms of sex because . that's what they sex because. that's what they have always said . the bottom have always said. the bottom line is it's been talking about oral and sex and this thing about genders. you can't just say that's not true because it was even a breaking story this week, an isle of man school having to the school but if there was look at the bottom line this child the line this happened that didn't just an awful thing it didn't happen. the bottom line is they send. the bottom line is they send. the bottom line is they send. the bottom line is this the advice is poor and a mixed and muddle and we are over sexual in our children. if we really want make our children safe. the first response will be to do

something about level of pull. they're exposed to. so we can we can. so we can that basically kids shouldn't be watching. right? so that's a point to the group. say something about group. and i say something about rc very has in. rc education very has come in. there's an decrease in there's been an 80% decrease in teenage pregnancy and know that's not true. that's that's simply not true. that's nonsense started what nonsense. they started with what can with that? i tell you can i do with that? i tell you what you do that we what you could do that we started work on teenage pregnancy over 20 years ago. it wasn't you on the wasn't just now you on the scheme probably about 20 it scheme in probably about 20 it did the form it is did not not in the form it is now. teach in 12 year old now. rc you teach in 12 year old and sex is reduced. that simply isn't. it's not fair to. say, should we have should we have ? should we have should we have? people whose singular is to be in school sex. we do that. but just just specifically because i was taught education by a bloke who was who was wearing socks and, sandals and lucky number woman in his life changed it. we now use maybe explain the lost internal practise as it were brought in who are government approved who are providing these services so they know it's not

and if you wouldn't use it when you use when you use hundreds of external bodies and the teachers are disempowered. you will get a range things that's why range of things too. that's why you many anecdotes in the you get so many anecdotes in the paper things being paper of wild things being taught. the bottom line is the department education to department of education need to get of this but there's get a hold of this but there's why it just the job of why isn't it just the job of parents. exactly and this is the women get non—cancer parents don't even know what they're doing. yeah, but the point you say that it's the ideological say is that it's the ideological pot that's the point where teachers are a masquerade. it is. is that these ideal are is. is that all these ideal are being taught and nobody can say . it on a school . yes. they put it on a school website but can't say no. website. but you can't say no. as parent . and the as a parent. and that's the problem. taken the role problem. we've taken up the role of with respect. we of parents with respect. when we look generation look at the younger generation coming through now is turning out i think a lot of them are incredibly weird whatever we're doing in schools on it, that's. that's the results be something i would you want to give which sorry would you want to have a conversation with your mother about some of the subjects we've just. yes but you necessarily

wouldn't for you know, you shouldn't. you should. you shouldn't. you should. you should let's be clear. this idea that you can't your that you can't speak to your parents things. parents about difficult things. nonsense. it's what people peddle take over the peddle in order to take over the ideology things and then force things children's are things down off children's are not the reality. what not good for the reality. what i will though, paul, i just, will say though, paul, i just, i just want to, i just want to circle back where. amy is completely why the level of access to our young have to is appalling. that's we appalling. and that's what we should focusing . dominic is should be focusing. dominic is it it's just, just final. was it so it's just, just final. was it, is difficult to have it, is it so difficult to have a very basic level of sex education in schools just the bafic education in schools just the basic stuff and then parents at home say to that kid like don't a woman and you know, without at all a woman at all. yeah. i mean. yeah i'm not me that difficult. yeah. yeah. i remember a form of sex education that i had and i don't remember being particularly traumatised by it, but i also don't remember being told that there are 72 genders as, this isn't. it's like you can't say it's not happening because it is happening because it is happening in schools. it was

alleged to happen in one particular. all the remote possible or at least it didn't happen to schools where it's happening the fact happening you can see the fact that i'll let finish. that no such i'll let finish. you can see examples in it in the homework and things like that that have being brought home talk home with children and talk about stream and stuff it's happening all right. watching extreme a line under it were drawing and realised just drawing a line and realised just so coming up now panel we will be more we'll whether be back for more we'll whether the oscars declining president zelensky's at zelensky's request to speak at the shows that the award ceremony shows that the award ceremony shows that the woke are finally keeping politics separate from the maybe they just didn't have anything to give it next as bombshell reports claim that the palace expects harry and meghan at the coronation. that's the line a part of are expecting part of that they are expecting that angela levin explains she thinks sussexes are using thinks the sussexes are using children as shameless political ponies by giving them prince and princess titles. don't you have move .

break tonight? the daily mail has revealed that buckingham palace are making preparations for the duke and duchess of sussex to attend king charles. his coronation and despite harry and meghan's new roles as the royal family's biggest critics, they have no desire to leave the institution they find so offensive. the palace is official website has been updated on the sussexes children have new titles prince, archie and princess lilibet and a spokesperson for harry and

meghan said the decision use the titles have been settled for some time in alignment with buckingham palace and that was that birth rights . joining me that birth rights. joining me now expert and harry's now is royal expert and harry's biographer, angela levin. andrew, i thank you very much. this is the new line tonight that the palace making that the palace are making preparations for harry and meghan to attend. yes i don't think we should get too excited or too angry. however i think it's just if you've got a huge event and you've got you thousands of people coming, you can't wait for them to see people actually to actually stop what you're doing. so they've got find a seat for them. they've got to find, you know, which tiara she will make them aware and all those sorts of things. you can't actually just keep waiting. but i suspect that meghan and harry will keep them waiting to. sure. that it's really quite difficult for them and they will make demands , you and they will make demands, you know, they, they'll try and get on the balcony . they will try on the balcony. they will try and sit by the front in any row

that's going . i just think they that's going. i just think they will make nuisances of themselves because i now think they they've won i think they've won this next. but my hope that they don't win the war. what if they don't win the war. what if they won? well because it's said that king charles didn't know that king charles didn't know that they were going to make the announcement yesterday that they were going to give the children the prince and the princess names. and i think that . that's names. and i think that. that's right. because it came of a glossy magazine that just talks about actresses and actors . about actresses and actors. usually the announcement is made by the palace . and also we by the palace. and also we haven't heard any or any one comment and say how pleased they are that this has happened. i think they've been in quite a shock and that harry and meghan be very, very pleased about that. but the question i would like know is what sort of mother who nearly suicide when she was

within the royal family because she was so she hated it so much was she was pregnant then give her child an attachment to the royal family that will be a very heavy burden. while the young i mean they can decide if they want to have the titles . they've want to have the titles. they've got the titles a minute, the died they wouldn't title to those titles, but they could decide they were 1821 if they wanted to have anything to do. the british royal family which goodness knows how much they would know about pretty much zero, i think. but for the mother to do that, it had to hated it and. for her husband to do that, to the point of her supposedly being on the brink of suicide . yes, that is a leap, suicide. yes, that is a leap, isn't it to then say, well, this isn't it to then say, well, this is an institution that i would like my young to be shackled to. yes and harry as well. harry said, i want a family, not an

institution, but he hated it as well. and we see in him now the result of him leaving and becoming a sort of nonentity really and being ill and, depressed and angry , too full of depressed and angry, too full of anxiety . and why would he want anxiety. and why would he want to touch his family back to his children, his beloved children he says he adores in touch the with the royal family it is only just make them okay something that help them tantalise the royal family . and the royal royal family. and the royal family will be making preparations as it currently stands. anyway, these are the latest lines. this was the news that dropped tonight whilst you were on air actually, which is that royal family is that the royal family is supposed be making supposed to be making preparations. meghan supposed to be making pr

as well crack on with it. you did say that. you think harry and are to and meghan are going to make demands. what kind of demands are they be what are they going be and what should say to should the royal family say to them? think meghan will them? well, i think meghan will choose a tiara that she's from the royal collection. a collection? yes i mean, the collection? yes i mean, all the senior women will have senior royals, women will have a tiara . it's senior royals, women will have a tiara. it's up a huge day and they're allowed wear a tiara. so, meghan could make a lot of about that as she did before the wedding. that was a big argument was that . the second thing is was that. the second thing is that they could try and make sure that they would go on the balcony and said, you know, we're not coming unless. we go on the balcony . well, i don't on the balcony. well, i don't think , you know, king charles think, you know, king charles will a great big fight with all the nerves. it's building up to this great event and then where they sit, where sit in westminster abbey , where they go westminster abbey, where they go afterwards , they're involved afterwards, they're involved with i there's you know, they'll find loads things i'm just

giving you three but i'm quite sure like harry wants apologies we're going to the past. i think they will have a whole list of what they really want to do and this is what will be very, very good at. she will know. she said she doesn't know much about the royal family and she never did. but she'll have got all but i think she'll have got all her sorted out that what her books sorted out that what she and what she wants and she knows and what she wants and where they stay. of course, it might frogmore, but it might not be well , the rumblings are that be well, the rumblings are that it might be buckingham palace, which think will be which i think will be interesting. maybe that's charles's way of to keep charles's way of wanting to keep them close. well, might be them close. well, they might be in buckingham but of it in buckingham, but a lot of it is a wreck because it's all being redone. it's going to take years and it's going to cost millions. so it not be very comfortable them , certainly comfortable for them, certainly not small children . they not for small children. they can't run around there. well, what do you think the chances are to be the ultimate are going to be the ultimate metaphorical two fingers given by harry and meghan here, which is saying that they're going to come and then on the day itself

not i don't not showing up. no, i don't think won't up. think think they won't show up. think they'll an excuse that they'll find an excuse that they've all that they've decided after all that they've decided after all that they his birthday on they must give his birthday on day ? a four year old won't know day? a four year old won't know which day his birthday is supposed to be on. it's very easy to change it. but i think if they don't get what they want, could front page news want, they could front page news again about them not, you know, deciding not to come. i mean, the number front page features managed to bring to life is absolutely . well well it is. absolutely. well well it is. indeed it is. and it will be a frosty reception, one would imagine as well. well, i don't i don't think anyone will want to talk to them. anything about the weather. you know, it's too dangerous because you don't know, if they're then going to sell this the other sell it. well, this the other thing. yes. do you think thing. it. yes. do you think that they should undergo extra heightened checks heightened security checks to make that they're not make sure that they're not wearing not wearing a wire or they're not doing? that's doing? i think that's very difficult someone to with difficult for someone to with the you're supposed the royal family you're supposed to them they're to trust them and they're well, but i mean, last i think it was the queen's funeral . they had

the queen's funeral. they had somebody a guard behind them who was looking over a lot of the time . and i suppose he was time. and i suppose he was watching that and they might put him back again, but they can't be trusted. that's the trouble . be trusted. that's the trouble. if they showed, they could be things would be much easier. but they back on the basis of what they've done in the past. well is the whole is to crunch down the royal family they might want to work or ativ out in america but actually they really want to destroy it now because they think it's no good and it's old fashioned. they haven't got it in them to do that. i hope. andrew, thank you very, very much. can i compliment you on a fabulous brooch? well it's under 11. wonderful wonderful, wonderful royal expert and harry's bag for etc, etc. right. okay. so coming up, an uncanny , okay. so coming up, an uncanny, so callow mackenzie gives his take on bbc loudmouth gary lineker , seemingly getting away lineker, seemingly getting away with jibe. but next in the barbs by superstar panel debate. if the oscars rejected president

zelenskyy's request to speak at the award ceremony shows that the award ceremony shows that the woke are finally keeping politics from their loves . don't politics from their loves. don't you dare move people .

all right, welcome back, everybody. we have far too much money every day segments here. let's return now to tomorrow's news tonight and our mediabuzz oh, some front pages have just been delivered and we're going to go to the daily express now. ask if the bbc will force gary to apologise for his tasteless comparison after home suella braverman blast, the broadcaster comments as offensive . daily comments as offensive. daily mirror leads with the latest hate just to delays. is government bids to save money on the costly projects. the front page rate huge shambles to billions spent key link already axed now tories announce two

year delay the guardian they revealed that ambulance delays last year led to 500 people's deaths after it took up to 15 hours to reach their must. the same newspaper. that was, of course, completely behind the strikes which of course led to no deaths or anything going on whatsoever anyway , more on the whatsoever anyway, more on the media buzz now. it's not superstar political commentator dominique samuel is former conservative london . conservative mayor of london. candidate shaun bailey is definitely we this definitely as to we back this evening all of them broadcast is to a how we go right back now back now to the oscars who've hit the headlines with more than just the new diverse city rules. it was reported today and this is an interesting one they've declined a request to speak at this year's ceremony from none other than ukraine's president volodymyr zelenskyy. despite recently given high profile speeches at a wide variety of awards ceremonies, including the grammys and the golden globes, organisers of this oscars have turned down himself. a former actor for the second time in a

row after similar request last year was also reportedly denied. well, there we go. this is so tell me , what do you make of tell me, what do you make of this? maybe they're just not convinced that zelenskyy is going to be able to put in a good enough performance. perhaps that the real issue here, because zelenskyy is quite the performer and know if the issue is that they don't want politics at the oscars , i think that at the oscars, i think that would be a good thing. and look, i understand people call me unreasonable. i get that if you're in a war but you probably want to get as much support as possible . you know how do you possible. you know how do you have time to be on all of these you know , in all of these you know, in all of these different places, all of these different places, all of these different award shows in the middle of a devastating war? i just think it's all a culture i'd have to in the oscars if the right thing it's about time they moved the oscars away from politics this is a very serious political issue. it's about a

war. but just to pick up on dominique's point, he actually should be trooping around the world. only reason the world. the only reason the ukraine's able survive ukraine's been able to survive this is because this russian attack is because they've so much to buy they've raised so much to buy they've raised so much to buy the weapons, to fight back. so actually doing this he's actually by doing this he's supporting country best supporting his country the best he have done the he but the oscars have done the thing of backing away because the one thing that will say though let's see they react though let's see how they react a more lefty type issue is a much more lefty type issue is we know we know is going be stocked full of lefty jokes and all of this stuff, isn't it? we just know that's fine. but i separate that. that's a separate thing. they've, said no thing. they've, they've said no to this and for me they have legitimate reasons. what mean is i next year somebody. i imagine next year somebody. well can i speak the oscars well can i speak to the oscars about climate change or whatever? will they back from that? make rule that? will they make a rule that's for everyone. i i'm that's same for everyone. i i'm surprised suddenly they've surprised that suddenly they've given why. yeah let's given a reason why. yeah let's just shut it down so as to where may no doubt more or less will come. and also, like what does what question would be, what what my question would be, what does gain from this does he seek to gain from this does he seek to gain from this does gain from these. does he seek to gain from these. yeah, this is support of the

yeah, this is the support of the people he would say it's one of people. he would say it's one of the most viewed tv events of the yean the most viewed tv events of the year, probably. the most viewed tv events of the year, probably . and his face is year, probably. and his face is on and therefore he can put across his side of events. i it so said really early on in the conflict that he the key to keeping the ukraine situation in ukraine war in ukraine going the intention word was to stay in the headlines. yeah to keep it going to keep the propaganda going. no the support of the american people for him is a matter of life death. when the american president is making decision to support or not view of the american people, bolstering the view of the american people be will be very important. so i can see he'd want be there. and as amy want to be on there. and as amy says, keeping himself in the american on probably the most watched the year watched occasion of the year would be a good step for him. so what purpose? so what? just to keep going. ithink what purpose? so what? just to keep going. i think it's to keep it going. i think it's to keep it going. i think it's to keep for i think it's keep going for him. i think it's to survive to end it is want to end it? i think that's been my

clear allegation i think i think well based really offensive to suggest it was offensive amy yes because he's countrymen and i don't know i'm sorry but if you really cared about that you wouldn't be saying the things that he's been saying. like what? just you're going to have to like regards to to like like in regards to crimea they're never going crimea that they're never going to the ever to give up to the ever going to give up crimea to. the russians, despite the fact that russians have the fact that the russians have that for quite a time now that for quite a long time now to make statement like that, to make a statement like that, thatis to make a statement like that, that is almost like are that is almost like you are saying for your saying are prepared for your countrymen and, women, you countrymen and, women, if you are so concerned them are so concerned about them to die many years, to come die for many more years, to come at reasonable would be able at any reasonable would be able to accept that by making what you are made on your. just let me just give you let me just give you this let me give you another interpretation all he's saying to russia. if he said to russia, it's fine have crimea he's saying they'll come and take saying take some more. so he's saying we crimea and we we won't give up crimea and we won't of our won't give any of our land because we're to fight, because for them, it's a matter of life and death. i don't stand up.

and death. so i don't stand up. i don't to be an either, i don't it has to be an either, especially when the west has made no serious moves to take back crimea . the united was back crimea. the united was invaded and then we take scotland gone. i don't really want to be in the uk anyway. president's got a problem with this is the history and the context is just completely totally different in regards to you know just geographically what the situation is what russia's concerns are. i don't think we should trivially russia's concerns his concerns he wants ukraine to survive as part of that survival suggesting i won't give up anything else. i just want a crowbar. i'm just going to crowbar in something else about the oscars before we on to another topic which is apparently might gender apparently might be going gender neutral their award. neutral with their award. seriously is another you seriously this is another you know, had sam know, before we had sam smith you as far you decided to identify as far as i can tell as honey roast ham. oh, hot oh them lot if you are going to break this sea jelly. i mean, i am no best

stuffing in tray . i actually stuffing in tray. i actually also mocked my own face onto to also mocked my own face onto to a joint of honey rose ham the day they did it and proved i'm very much thoughts to my lover. welcome to the anyway should they be going gender neutral. do you think it's offensive to women they've dug saying there's not going to be a best actress now is she going to be best performer? they're performer? well, they're all gender neutral. categories. gender neutral. the categories. cinematographer, gender neutral. the categories. cinemato�* know, r, gender neutral. the categories. cinemato�*know, but they're the actress. i know, but they're the only aren't gender neutral. only ones aren't gender neutral. so actor like , emma so why take an actor like, emma corrin, who's in the crown then non—binary. where do they . what non—binary. where do they. what you doing? what you're doing? dropping to a different sizes , dropping to a different sizes, by the way, we just you just robbed women of another opportunity to. shine you look, let's be clear. if harvey showed us anything like in hollywood for women actresses is particularly awful. so to rob them of this recognition think then why are the other categories gender neutral then? why is it fine? well, do you see

some progress ? i tell you one some progress? i tell you one very, very for female directors is that maybe they should add. but i you what's different. oh so that would be the difference between being a and female. i i agree with you. i agree with you i agree with you. but i tell you what is different because from an artistic view, your films have all men women equal have all men and women equal amount power when it comes to amount of power when it comes to getting an actress getting a story written about you. most stories written men . stories are written about men. that's why shouldn't rob that's why they shouldn't rob women of this opportunity. absolutely and the absolutely shouldn't. and the patriarchy . and emma corrin , patriarchy. and emma corrin, what category do they go in both . in both. she's actually maybe just about women. but how about she's not been any if she wants be stupid about that. i'm sorry. i thought no. and you go right. okay. well, it's strong stuff. no. so writer almost ended 25 years eurovision anguish last years of eurovision anguish last yeah years of eurovision anguish last year. it's also neuer because many people he was robbed. but anyway, there we go with banger

this is . his first this is. his first. oh, yes course he was based and shamelessly beaten because was so ukrainians of the on everyone felt same but they didn't anyway. well this year the nafions anyway. well this year the nations lie with sing give me malala after she revealed that she'll be representing the uk the eurovision song contest in liverpool on may the 13th. well has she got what it takes to beat the rest of europe on home? let's take a listen . stand out . let's take a listen. stand out. how you doing online . and the how you doing online. and the night instead i'm so better now . we will. and instead, in, you're wondering whether or not you've heard song before you

have because it sounds like every other song well but eurovision i wrote a song which i think in itself might be follows up . a song has already follows up. a song has already reached the top the world. so the uk on the chart after its release come offer. anyway, the uk is also seventh in the also in the contest presumably behind mars. so tom aiming to go one step further than some ryder and take the crowd . do you like what take the crowd. do you like what you heard that doesn't . no, i you heard that doesn't. no, i never heard of that person, which is interesting. no, i, i thought was a catchy tune. but let's be clear ukraine to go to win didn't can they back to back with it. yes yes they can. i think we won last time. and of course we did it. i'm sure you do. what do you do? look, here's the difference. do you think now it's a good song. did you? yeah already bad . i'm biased . i like already bad. i'm biased. i like it. well, there we go. okay i think we can all agree that's quite enough of that. according to the independent newspaper trans comic jordan grey is , the

trans comic jordan grey is, the 13th most influential man for playing piano, it come off. we've seen it. he's a man. anyway playing the piano with that penis will be will be on it again tonight. his greatest present union, jack castle. wow. i wonder which one they could possibly find out. in the crowning moment of the show is i crowd today's greatest president and union jackass. but next, an unconcealed catwoman. kenzie is going searing on the going to give his searing on the bbc, they won't take bbc, confirming they won't take action against a loud mouth. gary and the left are gary and if the left are endorsing a dangerous, bold policy .

no spin, no bias, no censorship time , putin is back to name time, putin is back to name monday for unfiltered political from some of britain's top commentators, including walden kelvin mackenzie and neil oliver. plus, as always, they'll be fiery debate with the superstar panel joined on monday

. 9 pm. to 11 pm. only on. gb news. that's right you are to part of next week. the man himself is back it's time now for cancelled this is where top commentators speak out controversial issues without their fear of cancel culture that's sweeping rest of the media. now earlier , smug sports media. now earlier, smug sports watcher gary lineker arrogantly dared to suspend him after. his comparison of the government's new migrant to germany was this right. do you fear getting suspended ? not do you stand by suspended? not do you stand by what you said or do you stand by what you said or do you stand by what you said and what's right? well, in any telling, move from the british bashing corporation , it seems that they have once again bowed to the supposed be kind presenter three confirmed via twitter that it will still

be hosting match of the day saturday. well, the beeb's raises questions over their acceptance of lineker's dangerous view that britain leave its borders open to thugs like 28 year old iraqi immigrant rivas mohammed, who has jailed now for six years after stabbing an 18 year old british student alice wheeler. mohammed carried out the attack in a bid to be deposed. ted, after becoming disillusioned with life, living in a taxpayer funded hotel. kevin mckenzie joins me now . our kevin mckenzie joins me now. our story makes me feel a bit sick kelvin. your views . well, it's kelvin. your views. well, it's one of the consequences of just allowing anybody to in our country and they're coming by boats. the issue for the bbc is this in some i vowed to lineker because incredible to have that amount of hatred and violence both at home and in stand up. so i congratulate him on the free speech issue . i don't speech issue. i don't congratulate the bbc on it because they know that in fact

he will be back at this issue for weeks and years to come . and for weeks and years to come. and isuppose for weeks and years to come. and i suppose what he's hoping is that he will outlast the general , almost certainly outlast the chairman who appears to have got the job because arranged for a loan for boris. so i, i, i, i don't know where we're going on this. my solution to it is quite simple. anybody who feels that lineker shouldn't be on the bbc, by the way, be on bt sport, be on talksport , do whatever you on talksport, do whatever you like, start your tv channel, start your own website , do start your own website, do whatever you are a successful man . but anybody who feels that, man. but anybody who feels that, why don't they pay the why don't they just not pay the licence fee? because strictly the revenues collapse . so would the revenues collapse. so would they then ease him out the door 7 they then ease him out the door ? but the thing the thing that i don't quite understand for the bbc calvin, i think i know a lot of the bbc is that they have essentially a monopoly on football coverage, premier league football coverage at, that time match of that particular time match of the it they do not need

the day, is it they do not need lineker , do so what are lineker, do they? so what are they afraid of? the viewing they so afraid of? the viewing figures would drop at all if figures would not drop at all if gary lineker presenting it. figures would not drop at all if gary lineker presenting it . yes. gary lineker presenting it. yes. no, he's just done it for a long congratulations. i don't . bad congratulations. i don't. bad about dumping people have done it for a long time off radio to so why should they worry about dumping people of match of the day. it's a goes show which is not about personality. it's about whether the ball goes in the back of the that's what angle it was so but the issue for the bbc is that it's not going to go away so you get clever like nick robinson and these other guys who work for these other guys who work for the bbc that beside themselves they are trying not to say anything that is going to either look or labour and actually give them credit and i'll give david credit because there's been a effort of late in order to go back to being balanced and now it's all thrown over board. you can only get promotion you can only stay at the bbc if you are

in favour of 150000 to 100000, 300,000 people coming from the middle east or a whole of africa , group suella braverman said other day that there will be 100 million potential migrants coming to our country under the present . tell me , tell me, mr. present. tell me, tell me, mr. lineker . tell me . tim davie is. lineker. tell me. tim davie is. this acceptable. what do we call 60 million people in that country . we would literally be country. we would literally be overnight overnight the way things stand would be a caliphate you know but the thing is the thing is to use violence they could just when we when we look when we look at now the stories that we just raised before about the individual who came here and he stabbed came over here and he stabbed someone in a bid to get deported and things people i think will be that be rightly concerned that people will rightly concerned . the will be rightly concerned. the kind refugee that gary kind of refugee that gary lineker had in his sprawling mansion or whatever it is, will be very different radically

different in some cases , radical different in some cases, radical and radically different from the people who might be at the hotel down the road, and they might now feel a bit afraid to talk about that , might feel as though about that, might feel as though they have to self—censor as a result of this and in that sense is , what gary lineker is said is, what gary lineker is said plus the bbc's reaction actually . well the mother i don't know whether you've read what the mother has said tonight. the of that boy. i mean she out that another inch further over it would have hit is his spinal column in which this might have been a very different discussion and this would have been a different discussion right at the minute. we have a liberal of arts at the bbc saying one thing and somebody , you know, and somebody, you know, fortunately now recovering , fortunately now recovering, although has not resumed their studies and also has sleep . so studies and also has sleep. so the mother says , how does this the mother says, how does this happen ? and, of course, what do happen? and, of course, what do you say to her? it happens

because what? because are plenty of clinicas out . there aren't of clinicas out. there aren't plenty of politicos out . why plenty of politicos out. why don't we have a proper poll? 10,000 strong poll. find out people think and i everybody my bet would be like 65 70% 7030 on 7030 if 70% of us stop paying out our bbc tax , what would out our bbc tax, what would happen? they would have lineker out the door at 100 miles an houn out the door at 100 miles an hour. that's all i. want i don't want him to carry on saying it. i want him to carry on saying it when i'm funding his pay packet, that's where i want to stop. yeah. look how we thank you very much as always. strong stuff as always. go. that was fleet street. calvin mackenzie wading always. go. that was fleet st|rightzalvin mackenzie wading always. go. that was fleet st|right now.| mackenzie wading always. go. that was fleet st|right now. it'iackenzie wading always. go. that was fleet st|right now. it is:kenzie wading always. go. that was fleet st|right now. it is time e wading always. go. that was fleet st|right now. it is time to nading in right now. it is time to reveal today's britain and union jackass. reveal today's britain and union jackass . you want me to reveal jackass. you want me to reveal thatis jackass. you want me to reveal that is my superstar panel got dominique samuels got shaun

bailey and of i mean a cow that we got so we're going to start with greatest britain and dominate europe ab is going to love this one. mine is miriam cates , mp for raising vote for cates, mp for raising vote for concerns about the content of sex ed sex education in schools . okay. yes we spoke about that earlier on did well it's a strong start sean calm minds is nana akua for weathering the storm of the mobs on her by gary lineker. she exactly the kind of present we need looks at both sides of the argument and says we can disagree. what are you trying to say, sean? yeah okay. all right. i believe this actually me being your other favourite presenter. sure talking to another look earlier . well, he's a total an absolute hypocrite . you know, he can do hypocrite. you know, he can do what he likes in his spare time, but when he's working for the bbc and they can comments like that, others would not away with it. and that is my beef it. he shouldn't be allowed to be making political comment on things that affect as a as a

things that affect us as a as a people. well i may have to, but my nominee is the comedian jordan grey for being genuinely hilarious i'm putting out nothing into the world to set for fun and positivity despite the ignorant and negative response from certain commentators who i don't. yeah stand show. there's something so funny about exposing your penis . okay. all right we've got we've we've got we've we've got a little but you can definitely see something you can definitely see something you can definitely see vile with you can definitely . oh well you saw there is a really funny right people people watch song that this three minute song that precluded that ending. well i'm looking forward to the video with you will close i'm just going to cut it now tell you all to shut out the winner is not to require that we go right here on saturday. well, don't show him bail. he asks,

guys. yes, yes, yes. right now let's let's talk. let's call let's go. let's talk. let's call called union jackass nominate hemi. the dean dorries hemi. mine is the dean dorries for the ridiculous tweet she posted making light the mental health crisis that was ongoing dunng health crisis that was ongoing during the pandemic. it's really ridiculous, actually, because she was mental health minister at the and she's not even at the time and she's not even reading article in which reading the article in which says that they didn't even at the most vulnerable people, in order them to come to that order for them to come to that stupid. so i'm quick like my uni jackasses gary lineker for freedom he's above the balance rules bbc need to take charge of this . it puts rules bbc need to take charge of this. it puts all of the bbc at risk and i make mine is miriam cates mp misrepresenting what is going on in vital rc lessons . going on in vital rc lessons. oh, okay. all right fair enough. well, i can reveal that this week's tv jackass . yes, that's week's tv jackass. yes, that's right is gary lineker. i'm sure we've double sean we've double sean blades just two weeks. he just ran right on that's it.

even now you're all back even can i just say thank you very to all three of you? this has been one of my favourites ever panels. well i've loved this. i really hope that we can give you an easy, warm feeling anyway. right. look, thank you very much, everybody. ladies and gentlemen, you've been watching at home. i have, of course, been covering for the man himself, the tv royalty. don the legend, tv royalty. don watson, i'm very pleased say watson, i'm very pleased to say and well they be and to you are as well they be back monday . and to you are as well they be back monday. dan will back again on monday. dan will be on screens from be back on your screens from 9 pm. monday. i know he's pm. from monday. i know he's missed very, very, very missed but i've very, very, very much enjoyed filling in for him. thank you very much. much loved

by hello. it's 11:00. by hello. it's11:00. i'm rory smith in. the gb newsroom at least six people have been killed and several more injured after . a shooting in a church in after. a shooting in a church in the northern city of hamburg . the northern city of hamburg. police and emergency services at the scene where a large scale operation is underway in. the ulster dorf area people were seen being escorted out of the jehovah's witness centre . some jehovah's witness centre. some two ambulances , amber weather two ambulances, amber weather warnings for, snow and ice are in place for parts of the uk overnight, bringing with it a potential risk to blizzards are due to cause treacherous conditions overnight with 50

mile per hour winds