n0 spin, no bias, no spin, no bias, no censorship . dan wootton tonight westminster too. and the msm sharpen their pitchforks as the bofis sharpen their pitchforks as the boris johnson witch hunt heads to a kangaroo court next. but if this is really about partygate, why isn't the current prime minister alongside boris.7 well, the chancellor's got to deny in the chancellor's got to deny in the house that eight attended any of the downing street christmas never speak right. did not attend any parties . i'll not attend any parties. i'll explain why for the sake of democracy , the sue gray stitch democracy, the sue gray stitch designed to finish off boris's

political career must fail . political career must fail. that's in my digest. next, before i get the view of my superstar panel we just saw them there. adam brooks, shaun bailey and i mean a columnist today, then former secretary priti patel becomes , the most senior patel becomes, the most senior political ally of boris johnson to speak out against the witch hunt , lack of transparency the hunt, lack of transparency the lack of accountability . i think lack of accountability. i think there is a culture of collusion , frankly , i don't miss her , frankly, i don't miss her unfurling . she she'll take on unfurling. she she'll take on that and more issues matter to you, including isis bride shamima bacon's bid to return. i have seen the security intelligence information and i would absolutely re—endorsed that position again and gary lineker to you know i've experience such comments from him as well when i was home secretary . we've also got more secretary. we've also got more shocking in the lineker scandal tonight after his agent claimed match of the day presenter had a seat crew special arrangement with the bbc that gave him free

rein tweet about contentious political issues, including my fleet street icon calvin mackenzie wants heads to roll over this latest liberal bias outrage is unmissable opinion coming up. lives too. also on the way, should sex education for children under eight be bannedin for children under eight be banned in favour of lessons that? teach the sanctity of marriage ? will ex—tory minister marriage? will ex—tory minister ann widdecombe thinks it's time family values return to britain's classrooms. she's live later this hour. and diana's butler, paul burrell , predicting butler, paul burrell, predicting harry will attend the coronation alone because meghan won't want to face the music. is the duchess of sussex brave enough to see the family members? she viciously attacked my role masterminds lady colin campbell and phil dampier make their big return this hour . and as he's return this hour. and as he's accused of lacing the conservative move movement is our very own calvin right to challenge the drag queen story time movement he takes on his conservative rival i'll be our

man conor in what promises to be a fiery clash live in the studio shortly as i have a first look at tomorrow's newspapers front pages hot off the press and my final personal duty and jackass of the week to this is dan mortensen i let's go . mortensen i let's go. very important digest setting this boris johnson witch hunt next week in just a moment first though those news headlines at nine with polly middlehurst . nine with polly middlehurst. dan, thank you and good evening to you . well, the health unions to you. well, the health unions have agreed a pay offer with the government today and. they'll put it to a vote with nurses, ambulance and other nhs workers . england deciding whether to accept next week. the offer proposed a consolidated pay increase of 5% and an additional

lump worth at least £1,655. health unions now suspended all plans strikes and are recommending that their members accept the deal in the upcoming ballot and that comes after health workers in scotland represented by the gmb union, accepted a six and a half percent pay offer. the scottish government. the prime minister says today's agreement is message to other unions to stop the strikes and start . we want the strikes and start. we want have constructive dialogue with unions . we're serious about unions. we're serious about finding fair and reasonable agreements on public sector pay. i think today's agreement demonstrates that and what i'd say to all other unions , you say to all other unions, you know, please don't be striking please come in and have those talks. we've been wanting to do that and we today's agreement, we're serious about it. don't want . well, want disruption. well, separately, junior doctors belonging to the british medical association are yet to resolve their pay dispute. however they

have welcomed an invitation negotiate from the government with talks set to take place tomorrow. now the energy secretary has been reminded not to view sensitive government documents on his personal phone after he refused to delete the app. tick tock . that comes after app. tick tock. that comes after cabinet minister oliver dowden introduced an immediate ban on the app on any government device due to security . however, grant due to security. however, grant shapps says he'll continue to use the social platform. mr. dowden has described that as a risk . we'll have received risk. we'll have received separate briefing in respect of he should use his personal device that would include not having sensitive government documents on his personal device. it is just a fact that the ultimate ownership tick tock is from a chinese entity and all those entities are subject to chinese national security . so it chinese national security. so it may not the case that this is happening now and. i don't have any evidence to suggest that

thatis any evidence to suggest that that is the case, but that it is a risk risk. and lastly, meghan markle is to share one of her favourite cake recipes support of a charity cookbook . the of a charity cookbook. the duchess of sussex is favourite lemon cake recipe will feature the world central kitchen cookbook. the world central kitchen cookbook . the proceeds cookbook. the proceeds supporting communities affected by natural disasters and humanitarian crises. the by natural disasters and humanitarian crises . the book humanitarian crises. the book will also include a recipe former first lady michelle obama . you're up to date on tv, .you're up to date on tv, onune .you're up to date on tv, online and dab plus radio. this is gb news. back now to dan wootton . wootton. something shocking is going to take place next in westminster, but because it fits the agenda of the political establishment, the blob in the msm , no one is the blob in the msm, no one is calling it out. the privileges committee hunt against boris

johnson , the last prime minister johnson, the last prime minister elected by the people , will elected by the people, will explode into public view at 2 pm. on wednesday. is he, as questioned, live on broadcast in a kangaroo court designed to finish off his political . allies finish off his political. allies of cummings rishi sunak and the labour opposition are united in finally defeating the one man who they know has the ability to beat. keir starmer at the next election. this process is, in my opinion , corrupt. the partisan opinion, corrupt. the partisan committee chairwoman , harriet committee chairwoman, harriet harman, has already publicly that boris was lying over gate, so her mind was made up long before the inquiry began . and we before the inquiry began. and we now know the partygate report itself was written by no other than sue gray. the apparently impartial servant who keir starmer is employing as his new chief of staff . you couldn't chief of staff. you couldn't make it up . so why on earth

make it up. so why on earth would slippery starmer not reveal when the conversations between him , ms. grey, about her between him, ms. grey, about her future role . did you first future role. did you first approach sue gray to be your chief of staff on? the on our personnel matter. when i was director prosecution white house when you first approached her to be your take the look out for chief of staff for a little while now. so when did you approach can i ask when you approached i make approached suit. look, i make i've for chief of i've been looking for a chief of staff for a number of weeks now. i will try again and obviously don't have to answer, but when did you contact sue gray did you first contact sue gray the possibility of becoming your chief to chief of staff? that's going to be out soon. you be laid out by soon. but you can't that. nothing can't tell me that. nothing improper at all. the whole thing stinks stitch up . because if stinks of stitch up. because if bofisis stinks of stitch up. because if boris is found in contempt, he could be suspended or even kicked out of the house of commons following a recall, ending his dream of returning to number 10. but a significant interview of the former home secretary priti patel becomes the most senior political ally

of boris johnson to speak out against the witch hunt. in an exclusive interview , this show exclusive interview, this show to be broadcast in next hour but has a preview. she is keir starmer sue gray all these types of things . they're not happening of things. they're not happening in isolation . my views around in isolation. my views around has happened, you know, pretty well documented now as well. i actually it's going to put our democracy in a very, very bad light. how a handful of members , parliament and the committee there really be that objective light of some of the individual comments that have been made. i don't want to name but you know it is a fact the lack of transparency the lack of accountability . i think there is accountability. i think there is accountability. i think there is a culture of collusion quite frankly. i really hope your viewers, you know, should they watch and they are obviously following everything that's happened , they will start happened, they will start pressing and asking sincere questions because we'll be doing the same . so i say corruption.

the same. so i say corruption. she says something seriously wrong . then there's the question wrong. then there's the question of why boris is facing this stitch up rather than the prime minister rishi sunak, who it is conveniently forgotten by the bofis conveniently forgotten by the boris haters was also living and working at downing street as the parties went on and also received the same penalty notice as boris for the same afternoon birthday cake presentation . now birthday cake presentation. now i didn't think either of these two should have received a fixed notice, but i just want to compare and contrast to make a point . these are the comments. point. these are the comments. bofisis point. these are the comments. boris is being hauled over the coals for making in the house on december the first 2021. what i tell the right honourable gentleman is that is that all guidance was followed completely dunng. guidance was followed completely during . number but what about during. number but what about when rishi said this on the 7th of december 20, 21, well, the chancellor categorically in the

house that he or any of his officials all spots attended any officials all spots attended any of the downing street parties . of the downing street parties. on the 27th of november or the 18th of december last year , the 18th of december last year, the chancellor of nowhere speaker. i did not attend any parties . now, did not attend any parties. now, let me be very clear. i don't believe sunak should facing the privileges committee either . but privileges committee either. but the fact the current pm has been spared , while the full force of spared, while the full force of , the westminster blob, is behind finishing off the formal one tells you all you need to know here. make no mistake . next know here. make no mistake. next wednesday's session is part of the anti—democratic coup to depose boris johnson , and they depose boris johnson, and they hope finish his political career forever for the sake of democracy see, it must fail . so democracy see, it must fail. so we're going to be bringing the

honest coverage with context about the motives behind the witch hunt that . you won't get witch hunt that. you won't get on the british fashion corporation or sky news or next. but to respond now , my superstar but to respond now, my superstar panel , but to respond now, my superstar panel, businessman and but to respond now, my superstar panel , businessman and activist panel, businessman and activist brookes, the former concert london mayoral candidate, a johnson ally, sean bailey, and the author and broadcaster amy nicholl . sean, what do you make nicholl. sean, what do you make of priti patel using the word collusion in regards to and the privileges committee witch hunt taking place next. the term spot on to mind. i can't believe that this so—called committee, this fair trial is where it's being run by one of britain's biggest political opponents. she's made it quite clear where she was coming from long before the people on the committee were selected . and if we want to say selected. and if we want to say to the people, this country, we are fair country, we do things by the book. she should never

been in this position. and been put in this position. and if you look at what's transpired since, the sue gray since, then the sue gray revelation particular, really revelation particular, it really does like it was does feel like it was a coordinated plan to remove a regardless of what the public for. so i think actually we as a country a real moment next week and it could actually be a problem because if it becomes the point where they really railroad boris out of there actually it will make people have much respect for politics in particular and westminster in general . adam brooks, is there general. adam brooks, is there a witch hunt against boris johnson going on. look, we see this with trump in america. and what happensin trump in america. and what happens in america comes here. it's sort of out of the playbook. labour are watching that and they're doing the same here. they fear boris so much that they have to discredit him. they have to they had to get him out right. they feared him might make that part one. that was part. one part. now he's off his entire it's remove him from any

possibility of running again. now i've said it many times. i love boris at some points and i hated boris some point . hated boris some point. likewise, i'm not saying again , likewise, i'm not saying again, but you don't to love him or hate him realise that he's the only man that could come into the conservative lives and run this labour party closed in a general election. i'm not sure that he would win it, but i think he would stop a labour majority . but isn't it something majority. but isn't it something more fundamental than that sean? it's also about british democracy because yes, we have a first the post system. first past the post system. people for their local mp , people vote for their local mp, but know we know that but we all know we know that your party received the 80 seat landslide because of boris johnson's leadership . and i johnson's leadership. and i believe he had right to finish his term . look nobody on this his term. look nobody on this planet could tell you there , planet could tell you there, boris, who won that election , boris, who won that election, very simple words get brexit done. and he did. and he spoke to people. i think why the labour party for him much.

labour party for him much. labour have a problem . they labour have a problem. they appeal the middle class appeal to the middle class lefties down here but they don't appeal to their natural heartland. boris does. and heartland. and boris does. and that's why so fervently conservative. and let's be clear, we've just talked about the democrats paper and labour copy. now but labour have a very particular thing. they're now using the law or the rules to remove conservative politicians. and is just the biggest of and boris is just the biggest of that. mean, michael, i want to that. i mean, michael, i want to talk about those two videos that i played the digest, because you could equally that if boris johnson intentionally misled the house, which i don't believe he did i? but if you're arguing that he intentionally misled the house, that's where he's on trial for . you could argue rishi trial for. you could argue rishi sunak did exactly the same thing earlier. so why there not the same demand by the bloc, by the westminster establishment, by the msm to get rishi sunak in front of the privileges committee? it's obvious, isn't it? because rishi sunak was not prime minister. the time of party i prime minister now

party game. i prime minister now and chancellor this it's and he was chancellor this it's very lovely that you three could form boris three musketeers. and i think your dedication to really being the cheerleaders for boris is very cute . no, it's for boris is very cute. no, it's a dedication to the irish respect your loyalty. he's the only with a mandate to shape democracy and what's right. i think the amnesia , the three of think the amnesia, the three of you is spectacular. and you'll forgetting that party has upset much of the population beyond repair. and that's what's brought down boris johnson and actually it's even more absurd that you could say getting brexit done is a positive . brexit done is a positive. that's absolutely in his legacy . he will be remembered for. hang on. oh, i know how terrible how terrible that you deliver on. biggest democratic . surely on. biggest democratic. surely how do you say delivered if you did a brexit piece and boris delivered it, it would be covered, fluff upside down and. the role wasn't perfectly clear

. it wasn't perfect . oh, don't . it wasn't perfect. oh, don't blame that boris gave the people of this country a choice and the people this country chose to deliver brexit for themselves . deliver brexit for themselves. so you are suggesting this country delivered you your fluffy piece of subversiveness ? fluffy piece of subversiveness? secondly, if we have amnesia , secondly, if we have amnesia, i'll always ask myself and as someone we all know, i had an intimate experience with politics. why was it keir starmer ask the same question? both the prime minister and press and the prime minister. keir starmer wasn't asked these questions was let off very lightly by paul . we know why. we lightly by paul. we know why. we know why. connect with. we show we covered all this that the identity have amnesia. all hey, boris, turn around . be singing boris, turn around. be singing hymns at a funeral was illegal, by the way, that boris can turn london red city blue . he can london red city blue. he can fight this labour party in the next general election again. you don't have to like him , but it don't have to like him, but it is a fact that he's the only

hope and that is there is they know that's the real situation you are in that so you're patronising the voters . i would patronising the voters. i would not invoke . audrey fraser very not invoke. audrey fraser very although he could be the country's only the alternative is starmer . starmer is in a is starmer. starmer is in a mistake he very good point shaun bailey adam brooks amy to call out my superstore panel me and remember that exclusive interview with priti patel coming up very, very soon, but also on the way with paul burrow predicting that meghan won't join harry at may's coronation . join harry at may's coronation. is it because the duchess isn't brave enough to face the family? she's so vish is thrown under the bus. how royal masterminds lady colin gamble and they will come here. they return soon. next in the clash political commentator albie amankona goes head to, head with our very own reverend calvin robinson. whether to challenge whether it's right to challenge the uk's controversial drag queens time, things are what you make of this downton gbnews.uk

vote. in our poll at gb news, it's calvin albie live the studio in just a couple of. don't go anywhere .

lady c and whitaker on the way this hour but it's time for the clash and one confined to

america events featuring drag queens , reading books and queens, reading books and performing to children have made their way to these shores . so their way to these shores. so these pictures from a drag queen baby event in london earlier this month sparked outrage from critics who say hypersexualized performers should not be prancing around in front kids. and calvin robinson attended a protest , a different venue over protest, a different venue over the weekend. have a look at this. she was all. i have found the best example of the culture wars and their stupidity . in wars and their stupidity. in this corner of south—east london, on friday lunchtime, we had some protesting idea of sexualising children . what? we sexualising children. what? we think it's abhorrent what we think. the children should remain innocent for as long as possible. and we it's an amazing thing for grown ups and to read the children but we think it's a good thing for drag queens to be british children. now, on the one you have roald one hand, can you have roald dahl? top 30 words dahl? but certainly top 30 words taken out of and on the taken out of them. and on the other hand, we're lowering and lowering the age to lowering and lowering the age to which can talk in a child's which we can talk in a child's face. was a very

face. now that was a very misleading left misleading video from the left wing political outfit joe. but in the aftermath of that , the in the aftermath of that, the political albie , our political commentator albie, our man conor hayes out at calvin on twitter asking anyone else tired of people embarrassing the conservative movement like this. news man responded by blocking his fellow conservative. so what do you think was calvin right to challenge the queen story? time movement ? challenge the queen story? time movement? dan gb news the email address so you can vote in our poll right now and i'm delighted to say we're turning to do battle on this once more , this battle on this once more, this time in the flesh . albie time in the flesh. albie amankona. and calvin robinson . amankona. and calvin robinson. so albie. why explain your tweet? why did calvin embarrass the conservative movement by protesting drag queen story time? well, it was just in this particular instance . i mean, particular instance. i mean, maybe calvin can tell us why he went to the protest but from the video which you say is misleading but from the video

that i saw it highlights that calvin and lawrence and other gb news star, you know, got nothing against either the two gentlemen personally went to go and protest drag queen story outside your new local pub, the honorary pub?i your new local pub, the honorary pub? i believe so. maybe you'll be protesting with them as well. and actually, the event question was not taking place . there were was not taking place. there were no drag queens. they have no children being read to by drag queens. children being read to by drag queens . and personally, i just queens. and personally, i just found the lack of organisation a little bit embarrassing whether or not i agree or disagree with the intention behind the progress process. so calvin robinson, you're very angry about it. albee's reaction while angry at all very disappointed very. suspicious. so i accepted the invitation to come on tonight, not knowing i was against. i thought we were having a debate against. someone random. i didn't know if it was him. i would have said no because i'm suspicious of his motivations. i'm happy debate motivations. i'm happy to debate people wrong, people who i think are wrong, but don't think can debate but i don't think can debate people. he's going to sit

people. now he's going to sit here dishonestly saying it was a particular event. right. but he's also retweeting articles that say there is actually character assassinate me. but also articles, this is also in the articles, this is a times piece by ivanovich times piece by david ivanovich that there's evidence that that says there's evidence that these sexualised these drag queens sexualised whatsoever. the basic whatsoever. i mean, the basic cursory internet will show miss rachel rare , charged with rachel rare, charged with possession of production of , possession of production of, indecent prohibited images against bruce williams charged with two counts of possession of child. moore found dead in cardiff convicted of child rapist adhd. drag queens of a person who raised money for a victim sex offender. i'm very, very disappointed that someone can sit here and deflect and make the issue. try make the issue about me. on his twitter. try to make the issue about laurence fox , people like us who laurence fox, people like us who are out there defending innocence, which is there's nothing important . what was nothing more important. what was the makes complicit ? the tape makes him complicit? what truth about the what was the truth about the event? hold off. because of event? what hold off. because of your approach. so that event was . we advertised that we were going to go and protest it. the event was removed, their website

sneakily, could find it sneakily, but you could find it there on the internet history. however weren't protesting however we weren't protesting that the that individual event and the job interview that job politics interview that i pay job politics interview that i pay quite generously. he pay you quite generously. he asked this about this asked me is this about this particular i said no particular event? i said no about the movement. think about the movement. we think that is that drag queens story is inappropriate. i think it's a safeguarding concern for men dressed women and scantily dressed as women and scantily clad. know, in and bondage clad. you know, in and bondage gean clad. you know, in and bondage gear, thrusting and gyrating in front of children. i think that's unacceptable. so here that's unacceptable. so i'm here to protest they cut to protest the movement they cut that bit from the interview. of course i did. of they did. because are very biased because they are very biased organisation cardno. organisation alabaman cardno. what the drag queen story what about the drag queen story hours themselves? do you think it is every parent's right to expose their children, to whatever sexual material they want to? or do you feel like? there should be protection for children against those sorts of displays. the first thing i would say is i've not been every single drag drag queen story which has taken place in the

united kingdom and, certainly not in the united states of america. i don't know whether or not all of them are age appropriate or inappropriate, but i believe the parents who say that the drag shows they've been to in fact, like the pattern that was in interviewed in the same interview happens interviewed on was saying that the event was completely age appropriate and i will defend the right parents to decide what to expose their to. and in a free society , say we've got say free society, say we've got say that people can do what they like as long as as long as they're not breaking the law. as far as i'm aware no laws are broken in this case. i think some of them are appropriate, but it's not my it's not for me to say it for society. what they do , their children, it do with, their children, what it means the drag queens . you means to the drag queens. you must also accept. yes you've listed a whole load of examples which obviously we should be very concerned about you very concerned about, but you must that adults have must accept that adults have a right to choose what sort of entertainment they want to view.

so the society we have strippers available to adults, we have on graphic available to adults. surely the problem here is about these very , very young children these very, very young children who don't have that right to choose. so in a liberal society, grown people do whatever they like within limits, right? so adolescence is its legal drag queen strip shows. all of that is appropriate for over eight teens. i personally wouldn't find it my cup of tea, but people can do what they like. however, when children involved, that's when it comes to safeguarding when we have safeguarding risk. when we have thongs kids putting thongs and little kids putting money as would money into thongs, as you would a it's not we a strip show because it's not we look that as grooming look look at that as grooming look look at that as grooming look look at that as grooming look look at this do you believe this is age appropriate? what we're showing screen at the showing on the screen at the moment, particular show, moment, that particular show, which at which we're watching at the moment. i think that moment. no, i don't think that is age appropriate. i wouldn't take a child to show. take a child to that show. however, feel to i as i said however, i feel to i as i said before, dan, i trust the parents say the drag shows that take their children to the age based it's calling them liars no

desire . yes. no, seriously, desire. yes. no, seriously, margaret, don't only pass i'm quoting a lot issue. i'll be smiling because you are sitting there. what am i lying about? okay, i'll answer the question. you're sitting there pretending you've called evil. you've just called me evil. earlier i started think it earlier on, i started i think it started being so over started just being so over dramatic. are you going let dramatic. are you going to let me you just me answer the question? you just control then? control have me. how then? i feel pleased to continue with permission. do continue permission. i please do continue now. it's okay to sit there and say people like me are the conservative movement. however people like you are the problem here because complicit in this child , you're complicit in this child, you're complicit in this grooming young children grooming of young children because that it's because you're saying that it's so you're reading stories , so you're reading stories, individual children. it's for individual children. it's for individual is age appropriate . individual is age appropriate. you want how is that how is you want to make yourself look like a reasonable many of the things that sometimes are not right. some things are entirely inappropriate. alvin. is inappropriate. alvin. alvin is underrated reading to i'll let calvin respond to that. i'll let you adults reading to children is fantastic one those is fantastic one of those beautiful it what beautiful does it matter what they were? yes, it does matter what the absolute if they're

wearing if someone if someone someone's drag someone's if someone if a drag queen went in nun's outfit queen went in a nun's outfit reminiscing your vicar's reminiscing out of your vicar's outfit, that outfit, would that be appropriate inappropriate appropriate or inappropriate or is because it's a is it is it just because it's a man wearing women's clothes that makes sense. because would be i don't think anyone has an issue with children attending pantomime. for example where you've got great pantomime. danes like chris like christopher biggins, you know who adore i think who, i absolutely adore i think the difference is and know the difference is and i know from personal experience, you know, are all about know, drag shows are all about sexual, it's sexualised and it's , it's not sexualised, controversial like you said, it's not happening. and you say, oh this is not it's not having that you say it was an abuse and it's a good thing all the problems are people like calvin you are actually the you clearly have some sort of issue i do with my stance on this you've i do yes. you've blocked me on twitter . i do yes. you've blocked me on twitter. i brushed do yes. you've blocked me on twitter . i brushed a said hello twitter. i brushed a said hello to you. it's embarrassing i'm embarrassed for you . that's so

embarrassed for you. that's so patronising condescension. i'm embarrassed for you being complicit in a movement grooming young children. i'm to be very pro—family. i'm to freedom. that's what i am. but grooming and paedophilia is not free grooming. and paedophilia for men dressed in women's clothes to read to all these lies just seen on the television, which i thought that was what's happening up and down the was inappropriate but i trust the parents who said, oh, it's interesting with age. it's interesting, though, isn't it? because the because usually parents on the left who attend these drag shows with kids, on whole, i would with kids, on the whole, i would to say it was young. these are lefty folk who want to sense the brilliant books of roald dahl. i mean, that feels a really consistency. yes, i think it's inconsistent for conservative artists who do not believe in censorship to essentially call for censorship . and that is my for censorship. and that is my problem with calvin's position. he is not allowing parents to make that choice of what they want to expose their children

to. i have said yes. yes. some say something inappropriate. appropriate expose breaking a appropriate to expose breaking a law that means it is not for law and that means it is not for me to get involved in those decisions that going when it comes about sex comes going to about sex education being education later which is being pushed into primary pushed further down into primary school is school and inappropriate is reaching children. seeing reaching children. we're seeing the boundaries all the breaking of boundaries all over inappropriate over the countries inappropriate because cannot reproduce . because they cannot reproduce. so to recruit that's so you want to recruit that's what's happening. of what's happening. just sort of you as to some sort. on you as opposed to some sort. on the legal bill on the online harms bill and the legal, but harmful content. what's your on that just out of interest you think it should be you think that should be included in the bill. i think we should do everything we can to protect protect children. so you think this but i the legal this but i think the legal breeds and the free tools the breeds and the free tools in the onune breeds and the free tools in the online but every single online harms. but every single time me a question, you time you ask me a question, you still own. yes or no. still have my own. yes or no. you entirely reason, yes you are entirely on reason, yes or do you think you are? or no? who do you think you are? i'm a question you've not i'm you a question you've not answered. i'll be am absolutely done i cannot type to done with you. i cannot type to someone. who is i'm not someone. who is this? i'm not answering the question. fascinating enjoyed answering the question. fascindidg enjoyed answering the question.

fascindid i enjoyed answering the question. fascindid i what enjoyed answering the question. fascindid i what do enjoyed answering the question. fascindid i what do you oyed answering the question. fascindid i what do you some it. so did i what do you some holy water this place. that's holy water in this place. that's what need. oh, i would. what we need. oh, i would. i would. i would go play. would. i would go and play. probably want to honest, probably want to be honest, i wouldn't surprised at. all wouldn't be surprised at. all i pray your thank you and pray for your soul thank you and conor thank so much conor thank you both so much but. who do you agree with on this very passionate debate? is it question the drag it right to question the drag queen story, our movement? lisa on i might not be on twitter says, i might not be religious, but i support calvin 100% on this one. it's just a shame that very few others are doing against this. doing anything against this. they away with they are getting away with so much schools qaiser on much in schools qaiser on twitter. she's me. she says drag is for adults, not children. i love my drag. it's a great night. but i would not take my two year old grandson to watch. and that's exactly i'm at she has a totally you on that has a totally with you on that and fan oppose the drag and from fan oppose the drag queen story is ridic queen story time is ridic lawless parents have taken their children pantomime years. children to pantomime for years. it this and your it is pretty much this and your verdict is now in 90. this interview that it is right for a couple moments in to question the drag queen story. our movement just 10% of you

disagree with calvin's challenging of this event coming up should scrap as calvin just mentioned shall we scrap education for kids and replace with lessons on the value of marriage and former tory minister and whittaker has very strong views on this one. she's going to be here soon. next, will prince harry be forced to attend may's coronation alone , attend may's coronation alone, even if his wife refuses , join even if his wife refuses, join him and face up to the family. she's just viciously attacked. for the past two years, our royal masterminds, lady colin campbell and phil dampier are back.i campbell and phil dampier are back. i cannot wait for this. stay tuned tuned .

there's help for households. are you over state pension age? if your weekly income is below £182.60, or £278.70 if you live with a partner, you could be eligible for pension credit, even if you own your home or have savings. it's worth,

on average, £3,500 a year and you could get help with heating bills and more, plus up to £900 in cost of living payments. and welcome . and priti patel on and welcome. and priti patel on the way. but it's time now for our royal masterminds, lady colin campbell, phil dampier and the attention seeking sussexes still haven't confirmed if they will be attending the king's coronation in less than eight weeks time and princess diana's rock, her close friend . former rock, her close friend. former butler, paul burrell, has laid down an almighty gauntlet to the duchess. speaking to closer magazine, paul said it's likely to be incredibly uncomfortable for them if they attend , for them if they attend, particularly meghan. are they to face the music? i don't meghan's brave or enough to be there . brave or enough to be there. she'd have to look in the eyes . she'd have to look in the eyes. a family she's pushed under the

bus. i think harry may come alone . but lady c back. and alone. but lady c back. and welcome back. fill us. you just agree with mr. burrows. take on this . i agree with mr. burrows. take on this. i certainly do disagree with take on this . as far as i'm with take on this. as far as i'm concerned he's ignored the fact that meghan markle is what is the most pushy , people it has the most pushy, people it has ever been anybody is just pleasure to come across . she has pleasure to come across. she has the height of a rag . pleasure to come across. she has the height of a rag. in pleasure to come across. she has the height of a rag . in fact, the height of a rag. in fact, prince charles, king charles calling , her trendsetting for calling, her trendsetting for a very good reason . if you're very good reason. if you're changing her fashion should interest because the woman is unembarrassed . she has no unembarrassed. she has no scruples conscience, no nor the sensitivity of somebody with either a conscience or schools . either a conscience or schools. and if she it is in her interest

attend a financial and in terms promoting her brand because this is always speaking about she will attend and she will brazen it out the way she's brazen everything and so i don't think that it's does anybody any ascribing human feelings to somebody who doesn't have them phil dampier who who you with on this paul burrell or lady c ? this paul burrell or lady c? yeah. good evening, dan. great to see lady back in top form isn't it straight away marcus get in there but can we pull boris? you know, he's got his finger, the a lot of the finger, the pulse a lot of the time. paul barry could well, right. but you know what, john, i think harry and i honestly think that harry and meghan up minds. i meghan have made up minds. i think quite dilemma think they're in quite a dilemma over do know that, over this. they do know that, you know, the public are probably going to booth and do know other of know that other members of the royal family probably going to give shoulder. on give them the cold shoulder. on the c says,

the other hand, as lady c says, they to be the centre of attention. massive event attention. this massive event where are going where 2 billion people are going to watching. i honestly to be watching. i honestly think they absolute conundrum they are an absolute conundrum over don't think they over this. i don't think they quite yet they're quite know yet what they're going it wouldn't going to do. it it wouldn't surprise me if they leave this to write to the last moment to make a decision. i mean they've got choices. suddenly, got four choices. suddenly, harry own, harry harry on his own, harry and meghan together. they bring meghan come together. they bring the a sort of the kids almost as a sort of human i don't human shield. i mean, i don't think they actually go to think they would actually go to the service, but the fact that they brought over here they brought them over here would count for something. would would count for something. well, to an well, they don't come to an i don't life yet made up don't think life yet made up their it's occurred their minds. it's just occurred to me what they should do. ask gary and do the opposite. the answers you know, and answers are, you know, and do the opposite. i would say even republicans the opposite. i would say even rep duchess of sussex, brian the duchess of sussex, brian cox, he's an avid snp supporter, star of the us series succession. questioned star of the us series successiormotives questioned star of the us series successiormotives for questioned star of the us series successiormotives for marrying�*d meghan's motives for marrying into the royal family the into the royal family in the first place, saying there's an ambition, clearly. was ambition, clearly. so this was an interview the host living in new he said, you can't new york and he said, you can't go into a system where somebody has already been to behave a has already been to behave in a certain kind of way and then just expect them to cut themselves. knew

themselves. i mean, she knew what she was getting into so is fascinating, lady c, because you would like brian would think someone like brian cox be the side of cox would be on the side of meghan markle. but no . any more meghan markle. but no. any more . no, i, i actually have met mr. cox and he's a very decent man. i mean , not agree with him i mean, not agree with him politically, but he's a decent person. and of he makes a very valid point , person. and of he makes a very valid point, you person. and of he makes a very valid point , you know, she has valid point, you know, she has entered a world intent on havoc , remember and she wrote the river princess and she entered it knowing that she intended to create chaos she's created chaos . she has done everything in our power to on the marrying, the stability to and this continuity of the monarchy . this the of the monarchy. this the monarchy is stability and cognitive unity. it is not about change and the merging of

hustlers who have decided that it is in their financial interest to pose as a left wing , when in fact meghan is the least left wing person i've ever run across . she's a right least left wing person i've ever run across. she's a right wing hustler . that's what she will hustler. that's what she will sell her soul for money. so it is so known that the family, somebody. so phil dampier lady see there i guess suggesting that meghan markle's palates cool positions are motivate aided by what's best for her is that fair ? yeah, i think . i that fair? yeah, i think. i mean, i don't take too much. what brian cox seriously on this subject because he's he's in favour of polishing the monarchy . and said that she was very . and he said that she was very ambitious but think he's got ambitious, but i think he's got the way. he of the wrong way. he kind of implied think if i've it right implied i think if i've it right what he in the interview what he said in the interview that thought she came that he thought that she came into it, wanted to sort of rule the roost and be the top princess then got fed up princess and then got fed up with fairly. that was with it fairly. but that was i don't she was ever in it.

don't think she was ever in it. i think she just used this as a stepping stone. she able to prey on harry's insecurities, and fortunately for her, he fell us and him it and he she convinced him that it was to leave as was best for him to leave as well. so i think i'm coming from a point of view. i a different point of view. i think she was never intending to stay the royal family the stay in the royal family the first place, that's where first place, and that's where he's quite wrong. he's got it right, quite wrong. but was to say she was but he was right to say she was ambitious, not quite the ambitious, but not quite in the same way. okay, now this this is an amazing clash of cultures, stories. donald. donald stories. the donald. donald trump book out next trump has a new book out next month. letters to month. it's called letters to trump. is where he's trump. and this is where he's going publish letters going to publish 150 letters from world's famous from some of the world's famous faces, former faces, including former presidents the late presidents jackson and, the late queen, diana. so queen, and princess diana. so trump in typically trump was in typically rambunctious , telling breitbart rambunctious, telling breitbart news, i knew them all and every single one of them kiss my. however, charles spencer is diana's brother went into protective mode, posting on twitter surprised . hear that twitter surprised. hear that donald trump is apparently claiming that my late sister diana wanted to kiss his since the one time she mentioned him to me when he was using her good

name to sell some real estate in new york, she clearly viewed him as worse than a no fisher lady, see? oh my goodness . do you that see? oh my goodness. do you that donald and diana got on? well, i seem to recall in my book the real dionne. i out that she despite his talent. oh i mean i did write it about 30 years ago. well it oh nearly 30 years ago anyhow . long ago. ages ago . but anyhow. long ago. ages ago. but i do know as a fact that she couldn't stand him and she herself said couldn't stand him know. so it's also it's very tasteless out of any form of president to use language that and to characterise . oh what is and to characterise. oh what is actually polite exchanges on the on a confidential as it's i mean

the language alone it's so inadequate you know it says an awful about trump as a human being i mean i have nothing against of his political achievements in fact i was very proud of the fact that he was anti war and i was proud of the fact that he was the economy. but you know, he was he was his love, which is reprehensible what? tasteless. i don't dignified. phil, what about. now? you know , diana can see now? you know, diana can see that he she you know, that's true. but what about reaction from charles spencer , phil? from charles spencer, phil? because that wasn't exactly justified. yeah yeah , yeah. it justified. yeah yeah, yeah. it was from trump and tom's spencer we could do without it really. but now i think i think he's barking up the wrong tree. i don't think diana would fancy donald trump. i don't think he was she had an affair with was cause she had an affair with john f kennedy junior. we

believe. and i think she was more the one thing i will is more the one thing i will say is that to see some that i'm fascinated to see some of letters. it of these letters. i mean, it could be quite yeah, i want to read i to read, no read them. i want to read, no doubt about it. his his affection. the queen was genuine. i think meeting genuine. i mean, i think meeting queen that state queen and having that state visit highlight his visit was the highlight of his presidency. absolutely. presidency. yeah, absolutely. absolutely all. yeah absolutely almost at all. yeah okay. well, no, i've got to admit, i want read the admit, i want to read the letters, i just do letters, too. i just do philadelphia lady colin campbell , have you back. we , so good to have you back. we will speak next week. but coming up, predicted 1.6 up, as it's predicted 1.6 million immigrants will arrive up, as it's predicted 1.6 mibritain1migrants will arrive up, as it's predicted 1.6 mibritain in igrants will arrive up, as it's predicted 1.6 mibritain in igrainext'ill arrive up, as it's predicted 1.6 mibritain in igrainext five rrive in britain in the next five years, can riches two knights pledge tackle my grace and pledge to tackle my grace and really be trusted myself a panel i'm going to tackle that just ten but next should sex and schools be banned from the right and replaced with lessons on the traditional values of marriage and for former tory minister ann widdecombe, she's got a proposal on this . and she's going to have on this. and she's going to have your say straight after the .

break it's time now for big city style with former tory minister ann widdecombe . and following widdecombe. and following sickening revelations that children as young as eight are being taught about oral sex and to how your partner safely . to how your partner safely. rishi sunak has announced welcomed intervention into lessons on sex education. the result of all of this we are bringing forward a review of shc stat h three guidance and will consult and we'll start our consultation as soon as possible .then consultation as soon as possible . then we to kim wants to go one step further than the saying that sex education should actually be banned for children under the age of eight and that the value of marriage and family should be taught in state so and you've written about this proposal in your brilliant daily express column this week . do you

express column this week. do you think it's a more censored bill proposal than some of the more extreme education which is in the classroom at the moment . the classroom at the moment. it's far more sensible, but just let don't quite let rishi sunak away with saying that he's having an inquiry what he originally promised was an independent inquiry that was original promise. now he seems to be saying that the department of education is going to carry out a review that's no good. they're marking their own homework. they are the ones who presided mess. and presided over this mess. and what said is quite shrewd, very children are being taught about aspects of intimate behaviour and worse still, that are not allowed to see the materials and about what they are being taught because teachers refuse that, whereas it used to be the case that parents have an absolute statutory right to, withdraw all their children from sex education, even if they didn't

think what was being taught was appropriate. and i believe very firmly that that sort of information is best controlled by a parent who knows how ready a child is to receive that sort of information . and some parents of information. and some parents will tell one child something at the age of that they wouldn't tell another until that child is ten because they might. and that's what parents for. so i think there should be no sex educator at all . in primary educator at all. in primary schools before that in romp and think that that way the parents don't have to worry because they won't be inappropriate stuff then i think after that the emphasis should be not exclusively, but the emphasis should be on stable marriage and on children being raised by a mum and dad in a long term legal commitment. and that's where the emphasis should be on. there was a time when we all thought

about, so what about with teenagers? and because we know that in this horrible world of onune that in this horrible world of online harms , everywhere that online harms, everywhere that are exposed from a very young age as teenagers to and all that, to how do you how do you tackle it once they are in that age ? oh, i think there's no age? oh, i think there's no doubt at all that in secondary schools the issues have to be tackled . it's no good wishing tackled. it's no good wishing that today's teenagers could be as innocent as , yesterday's as innocent as, yesterday's teenagers, because they would be the world is a very different place if. you say the huge role played the internet has changed the whole game . so of course, the whole game. so of course, children should taught when they are older. and i've no problems with that at all except that i still think it should be the case, even when the older the parents fully informed as to what going to be taught, what material is going to be used, and that those parents have a

right to object . now the problem right to object. now the problem is if parents children that age you and i know this parents of children at that age withdraw them from sex education lessons. we're going to find out from all their pals that curiosity will be beat them will probably get completely the wrong idea. so i think it's better that they're not withdrawn. i think the not withdrawn. but i think the parents have very parents should still have a very large is taught large say in what is taught particularly in the early teens. i think after that point i mean i think after that point it's just got to be realistic and then just finally it was the debate now clash. what do you make parents are taking make of parents who are taking young to these drag young kids to these drag queen story well, is story hours? well, my view is that there should certainly be no drag queens or hours in primary school in a school setting. obviously what parents do is going to be a matter parents, but i don't think it's a good idea and entirely the drag queen is saying but we know that some of them have been into schools and talked 73 genders or some such wrote to very young children in the books . you can children in the books. you can be an astro gender or a blue

barry. i mean , it's ridiculous, barry. i mean, it's ridiculous, isn't it ? and we're too great to isn't it? and we're too great to speak and we will speak next week. thank you very for coming up. should we scrap sex education soon? well, i think we definitely should, shouldn't we? and of course, that will be that we just discussed with ann widdecombe. but i'm going to tell you what's coming next. now my exclusive sit down interview with the home secretary, priti patel , as she reveals exactly patel, as she reveals exactly why the witch hunt against boris johnson has to stop. but next, are we concerned that the immigration figures are going to soar. immigration figures are going to soar . to 1.6 immigration figures are going to soar. to 1.6 million in the next five years? and does that make us question rishi sunak's commitment to cutting migration numbers? that's next with my superstar battle in the media box. we'll have the first look at tomorrow's newspapers pages to back in just minutes time.

is 10 pm. i'm dan wootton tonight in an exclusive sit down former home secretary priti patel makes a rare political starting with the privileges committee witch hunt against bofis committee witch hunt against boris johnson. that's going to become a kangaroo court next week. the of transparency the lack of accountability i there is a culture of collusion plot frankly alas pretty speaks on the reckless bid to bring back him back to britain. i have seen the security and, intelligence information and. i would absolutely re—endorsed that position all over again . and the position all over again. and the bbc's shame gary lineker. position all over again. and the bbc's shame gary lineker . you bbc's shame gary lineker. you know i pick spirit in such comments from him as. know i pick spirit in such comments from him as . well, when comments from him as. well, when i was home secretary . don't miss i was home secretary. don't miss one of the conservative party's

biggest unleashed on the liberal elites very shortly. speaking of gobby gary barlow as the billionaire's agent let slip that he has a secret deal with tim davie to tweet as much claptrap about immigration policy as he likes. should the director general face the sack? fleet street icon kelvin mackenzie speaks out on what is an absolute scandal in my opinion. that's cancelled later on. as i predicted , point on. as i predicted, point 6 million migrants will enter the uk in the next five years. despite this desperate and justified appeal from tory mp scott benton. i afraid this country in nearly full its prime minister to start taking his own pledge to cut migration more seriously. that's the big debate with my superstar panel on tonight. i'm joined by adam brookes. sean and amy nicol. tonight. i'm joined by adam brookes. sean and amy nicol . as brookes. sean and amy nicol. as teenage boys in coventry abuse unisex toilets by photographing their female classmates in cubicles, this extreme gender, ideology and danger for women

from cradle to and as the snp are forced to admit, they've lost a third of their membership . useless. you sir said this to. ukrainian women fleeing war. question how will the men . question how will the men. i promise you that is real . both promise you that is real. both those stories coming out in the media buzz. and was paris hilton actually on the picket lines today? find out when i crown tonight's greatest and union jack as the front pages arrive in mere moments to rise after polly middlehurst middlehurst. dan, thank you and good evening to you. the top story tonight on gb news health unions have finally agreed to pay offer with the government and are going to put it to a vote with nurses ambulance staff and other nhs workers in england deciding whether to accept it next week.

the offer proposes a consolidated increase of 5% and an additional lump sum worth at least £1,655. health unions have now suspended all planned strikes and are recommending that their members accept the dealin that their members accept the deal in the upcoming ballot. and that comes after health workers in scotland represented by the gmb union, accepted a six and a half percent pay offer from the scottish government. prime minister said this evening today's agreement is a message today's agreement is a message to other unions to stop the strikes and talks . we want to strikes and talks. we want to have constructive with unions, with syria about finding fair and reasonable agreements on sector pay. i think today's agreement demonstrates that. and what i'd say all other unions is, you know, plea , don't be is, you know, plea, don't be striking. please come in and have those talks we've been wanting that and today's wanting to do that and today's agreement demonstrates we're about don't want about it. we don't want disruption . well separately, disruption. well separately, junior doctors belonging the

british medical association are yet to resolve their pay . yet to resolve their pay. however, they have welcomed an invitation to negotiate from the government with talks set take place tomorrow. full details on tv news . now the energy tv news. now the energy secretary has been reminded not to view sensitive government documents on his personal phone after . he refused to delete the after. he refused to delete the app. tick tock. it comes . after app. tick tock. it comes. after cabinet minister oliver dowden announced an immediate ban on the app on any government device due to security concerns. however, grant shapps says he'll continue to use the social platform. mr. dowden has described that as a risk. we'll have separate briefing in respect of how he should use his personal device and that would include having sensitive government documents on his personal device . it is just personal device. it is just a fact that . the ultimate fact that. the ultimate ownership of tick tock is from a chinese entity and all those entities are subject china's

national security . so it may not national security. so it may not be the case that is happening now and. i don't have any evidence to suggest that that is the case, but that it is a risk risk . now lastly, meghan markle risk. now lastly, meghan markle to share one of her favourite cakes recipes in support of a charity . the duchess of sussex charity. the duchess of sussex favourite lemon cake recipe will feature in the world central kitchen cookbook. the proceeds going to support communities affected by natural disasters and humanity sharing crises. the book also include a recipe from first lady of the united states, michelle obama you're up to date on gb news. i'm back in an hour. now back. dan . now back. dan. tomorrow's newsnight now in our media abouts the front pages are

in one story denominations let's how see how they're covering at the metro goes with this offer of a 5% pay rise to striking nhs staff in bid to end the damaging dispute. nurses and paramedics been urged to accept the new terms as the ice celebrates the nhs deal that they believe will signal an end to public strikes with nhs staff in england to be offered that rise plus a backlog budget of over £101,000. the independent also leads with that deal of a 5% rise. they or at least ask it's the beginning of the end of the strikes. the guardian though focus on the upcoming casey report , which upcoming casey report, which will condemn what it calls the police's sexist and racist culture that it is failing to change my superstar panel back with now. the businessman and activist brookes, former conservative mayoral candidate shaun bailey, and the author and broadcaster amy nicol, now prime

minister rishi sunak , has made minister rishi sunak, has made his pledge to stop the boats one of the cornerstones of his premiership and released by office of budget responsibility suggests that migration into britain is due to boom. despite asylum system alone now costing the taxpayer £3 billion a year , the taxpayer £3 billion a year, shocking new figure of 1.6 million over the next five years has risen by 300,000 since the previous estimates. tory mp are understandably concerned about pubuc understandably concerned about public services are already creaking under enormous and we simply can't access hundreds of millions people who would no doubt to come here for a life. i am afraid this country isn't nearly full up, but it's not just so pushing back against expected surge in migration with the home secretary herself aspiring to bring net annual migration down to the tens of thousands target originally set

by cameron said why is forecast predicted by the obe are so much than what scott suella and many other tories are calling for? seani other tories are calling for? sean i think it's and they've looked at the trend , plotted the looked at the trend, plotted the numbers, seen the willingness of people to make that very dangerous journey and come up with a figure that feels a bit more realistic than most people talking about. but my thing about this is we all know that a certain amount of immigration has this country what it has made this country what it is. need to make it is. we need to make it a decision about what too much. decision about what is too much. and to support any and we need to support any government of any stripes to give us a proper immigration system. of system. because all of the people have accused the people who have accused the government of a myriad of things, what's very interesting is never come is they've never come up with a solution. until someone solution. and until someone comes up with other comes up with solution, other what doing, what the government's doing, you can't seriously. keir can't take seriously. and keir starmer particular has got a lot of points against government well done for him. what your solution, keir? until we hear your take you your solution, we can't take you seriously. adam, i think seriously. i mean, adam, i think these are probably too these numbers are probably too high, but i to high. however

this is a points based system, which means in theory the people who are arriving legally into the country should be feeling vacancies and service industries that we desperately need, especially, by the way if you look at the nhs , look again, look at the nhs, look again, i've i will echo what shaun says controlled immigration has shaped this country throughout decades and centuries. it's a good thing , but i used to own good thing, but i used to own nightclubs . there was a capacity nightclubs. there was a capacity limit for, a reason and that was , you know, quality of service if , someone can't get a , you know, quality of service if, someone can't get a drink or someone cut up dance. that nightclub doesn't function and it wasn't a safe and you shouldn't be safe. so that's the two things safety and quality . two things safety and quality. and scott benton was right to say britain nearly. i do say that britain nearly. i do believe i've been to get a doctor's appointment for my little boy for a couple of weeks now . it's been nightmare. so now. it's been a nightmare. so what happens ? another 1.6 what happens? another 1.6 million people come to . this million people come to. this country services . our roads are

country services. our roads are full of cars . it's going to be full of cars. it's going to be more cars . i just cannot see how more cars. i just cannot see how we can keep adding to the population . if we're struggling population. if we're struggling as it is . i mean, the positives as it is. i mean, the positives are that vacancies will be filled . but, you know, there's filled. but, you know, there's no guarantee that they will last. yeah. because shaun bailey, if you speak to a lot of conservative politicians, they will say the reason that have avoided going into recession this year is because of the increase migration numbers, the problem is i think the two issues have been conflated because this is what people now think about migration. they think about migration. they think about migration. they think about the boats , they think about the boats, they think about the boats, they think about the hotels that we're paying £7 million a day for this an the level of migration we have is not what's kept us out of a recession . kept us out of a recession. those people are not allowed to work at nonsense. you have a piece as we look at this, while we have a huge of people who are based country, born and based in this country, born and

raised this country, who need raised in this country, who need employment. to get employment. so we need to get we've many years have we've for many years have been drunk cheap international drunk on cheap international bodies, you know, come in to do the work we need to focus on our own young people and older people, them up and get people, train them up and get them into work. we always have to but must not do to have some, but we must not do that expense of providing decent well—paying jobs british well—paying jobs for british people. we are nearly people. i mean, we are nearly full, though, aren't we? i mean, if that the case, we've if that were the case, we've been we're nearly full been saying we're nearly full since the dawn of time . i mean, since the dawn of time. i mean, look at our social services piece today from the daily mail. some like years ago saying we're nearly full and if we're not full, like, it's okay . well, full, like, it's okay. well, young people, you're always moaning about the state of the nhs, you're always about the fact that young people can't houses. you're always moaning class sizes. do you not think ? class sizes. do you not think? those three issues have something to do with the mass wave of migration to the country. i think that's got lot more to do with . austerity and more to do with. austerity and mismanaged government funds . mismanaged government funds. now, i don't know how many more

people can we take. do you think this is the right number one point? if we take the number, if we take the number that so a tens of thousands. if i think that if we did take tens , that if we did take tens, thousands, then how people are going to try and come here illegally, it's going to go right up. yeah. and that's why the more you reduce capital equal number, you can't be tough on the legal number that needs to be as high as required. and also open borders. let's not also for open borders. let's not forget open borders . i know you forget open borders. i know you really we safe borders, but we don't know. i, i just i just i just want you to say what you're comfortable with. so say obasa is 1.6 million over the next five years. what number are you comfortable? isn't 43% of the nhs run by migrant so migrants are extremely important and find it baffling that just someone said can you give me a number a different country. they they deserve worse life chances. i think everybody should have the

right to apply wherever they see like you're pushing towards an open borders . so i like you're pushing towards an open borders. so i just wonder if that is number is there a number? is there a sean? i'm sure you can tell . me why? it's sure you can tell. me why? it's not practical. what i would like to hear from you is how it is practical. let's be very clear if went overboard, if keir starmer was open borders, fine. just tell when and how. i'm not saying we shouldn't have an immigration. that's never been my point. my point is a immigration system would relevant numbers we make all this stuff that the nhs is run by people from a boat that's true but about the people here who could work if we want to if we want to change that, we could raise up our own doctors. but here's the important thing we are issues. are conflating many issues. economic people economic migrants and people seeking , not the same seeking asylum, not the same thing. they're absolutely not. we robbing men to legal we are robbing men to legal immigration system . we are immigration system. we are robbing now. we are robbing many developing nations of . their developing nations of. their best talent. well, it's actually mean. look at albania. i find that as well. would i be all

right instead of stop the boats . can we just say stop the strikes , stop the being useless strikes, stop the being useless and start actually helping the people here. okay, now stateside action tv personality will be go vogue , be a name you're familiar vogue, be a name you're familiar with. and if you are it could well be due to her for pushing the boundaries of the to the absolute limit and getting away with it. so the latest minority group she's clumsily upset the travelling community weren't too pleased with her flippant of the word chipped beautiful women. the people who still believed thatis the people who still believed that is god . you know gipp that is god. you know gipp somehow and the election will still believe that he cared enough his wife. i should have cheated and i used another . and cheated and i used another. and i'm really, really sorry . now, i'm really, really sorry. now, that apology seem slightly more sincere. this was first slip up, but after twice having to row back on holocaust comments in which she said the state sponsors of murder of 6 million jews wasn't about racism , it

jews wasn't about racism, it seems the lessons of just last year have not been learned. i mean, it's also worth remembering that the travelling community themselves were victims of hitler's holocaust, leading some to feel targeted by now. at the same time , i don't now. at the same time, i don't think movie should be you know she's speaking on a private network the abc in the us but why i want to show this is i just find the hypocrisy of the left intriguing because while all the jeremy clarkson's and the lady horses of the world have to tread an increasingly fine , it's clear that whoopi's fine, it's clear that whoopi's wusses are not taken as seriously i mean , how shaun seriously i mean, how shaun bailey. adam brooks do stand by, because coming up with unisex toilets in schools causing controversy and potentially dangeris controversy and potentially danger is woking q 17 now pushing out kids at recess health superstore panel return to weigh in on that very shortly but next i bring you the second

part of my exclusive sit down with the former home secretary, priti patel, she her priti patel, as she her bombshell verdict on the undemocratic witch hunt against former boris johnson on former pm boris johnson on shamima begum and gary lineker priti patel. straight after the there's help for households. are you over state pension age? if your weekly income is below £182.60, or £278.70 if you live with a partner, you could be eligible for pension credit, even if you own your home or have savings. it's worth, on average, £3,500 a year and you could get help with heating bills and more, plus up to £900 in cost of living payments.

break welcome back, kelvin mackenzie on the way but, as i mentioned in my digest earlier , a former in my digest earlier, a former home secretary, priti patel is about to become the most senior ally of boris johnson to make an intervention against wednesday's privileges committee. kangaroo court, witch hunt against the former prime minister. but first, as we sat down her westminster office, i asked her about the power of bbc one involving gary lineker, the involving gary lineker, the involving shemima bacon . how do involving shemima bacon. how do you feel with this for over the past week when you have a high profile bbc and gary lineker actually comparing policy to 1930 germany which by the way i believe he has a right to say it not as a presenter with the bbc. he has a right to that as a citizen. but i think have a right to say that. he's been incredibly intellectually dishonest. know, i've dishonest. well you know, i've experienced such comments from him when i was home him as well. when i was home secretary. i fundamentally

disagree with that and i disagree with that and i disagree his comments. for disagree with his comments. for the obvious know, can't the obvious, you know, we can't sit back and do nothing . and the sit back and do nothing. and the new plan for immigration when i was home secretary. end to end reform of the asylum and illegal migration system . our asylum migration system. our asylum system is overwhelmed . that's system is overwhelmed. that's just a fact. now we have change where cases are being processed . that is a fact. that work is taking place. we recruited something like a thousand case officers process cases and do all sorts things. reform of the immigration courts and tribunals. a one stop shop so that people can't keep on going back at the expense of your viewers the taxpayer has to go back and appeal an and appeal member those famous deportation flights are blocked by the courts to bring them into that age assessment . 40 year old courts to bring them into that age assessment. 40 year old man masquerading as teenagers. i mean that's absolutely creating all sorts of is that's why we had the nationalising borders that was still to be implemented fully. so look the government

right least is saying stop the boats . i endorse that boats. i endorse that completely. is right. that we do everything to do this. but remember one thing as well. if this was easy, it would have been done by now. there's no one single solution to this. it's deeply complex. it's criminal gangs upstream and out of our country. we have lot of work. brilliant by the undertaken brilliant work by the undertaken by national agency. we have by the national agency. we have brilliant in law enforcement. prosecute people smugglers . the prosecute people smugglers. the number of arrests of people smugglers up last year and will continue to go up because we have the power do that to nationalising borders very quickly on securing issue. you will have seen this bbc campaign to try and rehabilitate the image of shamima begum , the image of shamima begum, the despicable isis terrorist . now despicable isis terrorist. now when you are home secretary , when you are home secretary, were absolutely clear , this were absolutely clear, this woman must not the uk. do you stand by the absolute right? absolutely right. and i maintain that i will always maintain that

position on the basis that i have seen the security and intelligence information and quite frankly it is the job of the home of the day to protect citizens, protect our countries individuals who are threats . and individuals who are threats. and i would absolutely read that position all over again. need to talk about the conservative democratic organisation in europe hatred. this is a body that i fully support because what we have seen happen the conservative party over the past yearis conservative party over the past year is the opposite of democracy . that's right. i have democracy. that's right. i have described what's place as an anti—democratic . now, none of anti—democratic. now, none of this actually about necessarily criticising the prime minister of the day, but members are unhappy , aren't they? so they unhappy, aren't they? so they may to get their democracy back. so tell me about what you're are doing tonight. so i've been a long standing proponent. i've spoken now probably about ten years, about more democracy in the conservative party . i the conservative party. i believe, you know, i'm a

grassroots conservative first and foremost. i've didn't get to vote no . the point i had and vote no. the point i had and that's the point that i'm aware of and i'm very vocal about all of and i'm very vocal about all of that. but know this does go back just it hasn't happened overnight. this has been a concerted issue for like probably 12 years since, you know, i was on the board of the party 12 years ago. i was elected to the board because i care about my party. i care about governance of our party. i care about our members. i joined at the grassroots, always been a grassroots conservative reason. the voice of the members who, by the way , they're the ones we the way, they're the ones we must be about, i don't know, 45 days away from polling day local elections. they're ones day in, day out, while the members of parliament are here in westminster putting in the leaflets through the day, knocking engage in knocking on doors, engage in concerts. let me put this to you . they would have voted boris johnson. so the party hierarchy stopped a vote from place. i was

there at the time, you know , there at the time, you know, everyone knows this. i was at the time people know where my support and loyalties lie there. but at the same time, that is exactly the point right. we have to make sure the voices of our members are hard working, grassroots is never ignored again . and so but if the members again. and so but if the members have been listened to boris , have been listened to boris, johnson would be prime minister. today, we may have a different outcome. we may have had a different outcome. got rolled back time. and, you know , of back time. and, you know, of course, small stuff. but this is why it's performance. it is important. and it's important for reasons as well. for some other reasons as well. i mean, as said, you know, for some other reasons as well. i myparty s said, you know, for some other reasons as well. i myparty membership. u know, for some other reasons as well. i myparty membership. absolutely the party membership. absolutely a vote. not everybody agrees with that in the party. not all my colleagues agree with that. but i also think even things like party conferences, you know, ancient enough to know, i'm ancient enough to remember days when our remember the days when our members would come and have the voices at party voices heard at party conference. now, i. that's important. i'm enough to remember, you know, when would be signed personally by the leader of the party it party

conference as thatcher back then but these things really matter and i think it's vital in terms of healthy debate. but actually the democratic features that any political organisation must have, that's i'm involved with the conservative and it's so important and i think this is a movement is going to build. finally something really shocking is taking place here with westminster next week. i have said on the record on my show amanda patel said on our superstar panel this week that it is a witch hunt is a witch hunt against the prime minister, bofis hunt against the prime minister, boris johnson, by the privileges committee led by harriet harman to try and finish his political . what you make of it and how has it been allowed to happen ? has it been allowed to happen? so i think there has to be some serious asked about all of this . and john, you also followed in recent weeks . you know, the recent weeks. you know, the issues around keir starmer, sue gray , all these types of things gray, all these types of things . they're not happening in

isolation . my views around , what isolation. my views around, what has happened, you know pretty well now as well. i think actually it's going to put our democracy in a very, very bad light. where is democracy, quite frankly , now? how can a handful frankly, now? how can a handful of members of parliament and the committee, you know, really be that objective in light of some of the individual comments that have been made? i do want to nine people, but, you know, it is a fact. the lack of transfer , the lack of accountability . i , the lack of accountability. i think there is a culture of collusion and quite frankly, involved here that i really hope your viewers, you know , they your viewers, you know, they watch and they are obviously following everything that's happened , they will start happened, they will start pressing and asking some serious questions because we'll be doing the same here. do you think bofis the same here. do you think boris johnson's political career is over or are they so scared of him because ? he is arguably the him because? he is arguably the only conservative could beat keir starmer at the next term. well i do. i think obviously and i will say this with a degree

of, you know, great conviction and for borrowers , i worked on and for borrowers, i worked on both of his mayoral campaigns. i had the greatest privilege to be part of his general election campaign in 2019. of course , he campaign in 2019. of course, he reaches parts of the public , the reaches parts of the public, the country that others find quite . country that others find quite. and i say that collectively . and i say that collectively. it's quite hard when you're a member of parliament to, you know, appeal sometimes outside of box or outside of the of the box or outside of the m25. if you're a conservative sometimes as well. he has and he has great skill and i have a lot of respect for him as well. he's the man that got us an 80 seat majority can't take that away from him. and can't forget that as well. that speaks to his broad appeal. and also, i think the fact that he is a you know, a force of nature as well, his personality , the way engages personality, the way engages with people . and i think his own with people. and i think his own personal experience as he was a prime minister that took us through pandemic , whatever one through pandemic, whatever one thinks about the government's response to the pandemic, he was very sick during that time carried on government, made some

tough decisions, got the vaccine, you know, really turned things around for us. and i think people should just really remember you that's what remember, you know, that's what strong leadership is about and good leadership to and you know, you just airbrushing all you can't just airbrushing all of trying to someone's of that and trying to someone's reputation , a small committee , reputation, a small committee, you know, with individuals obviously that may have a particular point of view , an particular point of view, an agenda to push for and sue gray who publish that report? keir starmer not even been to prepared reveal when he started talking to her about hiring later career. i that feels corrupt to me so i use the word collusion you've just used the other word as well. corruption i think the public expect better. yes in terms of transparency and accountable let's see. politics isn't a game. no. this is about pubuc isn't a game. no. this is about public service and how we serve our country and the british people. and with that, you know,

i think there are some serious questions that obviously cast armour of the labour party should should really be held to account over along with others . account over along with others. you know, this shouldn't magic itself up overnight. there's clearly a lot history that's gone on and i think actually greater scrutiny needs to be given them, including some in your but look we will see your party. but look we will see what happens on wednesday . let's what happens on wednesday. let's hope there is a fair outcome. for my home secretary priti patel. such a pleasure to. have you and breaking boris johnson has been re selected as tory candidate for uxbridge south rise with a majority of 7210. so he ain't going anywhere. yet coming up , he ain't going anywhere. yet coming up, i'm cancelled with gary lineker's agent claiming he had a special arranged with the bbc to allow him to tweet about political issues , including political issues, including migrants. why should this leftie loudmouth be given a special treatment by the state broadcaster? should tim davie be

axed for this shock king scandal? well, former editor of the sun mackenzie has a lot to say on soon and asks in the media with children and parents against unisex toilets in british schools. is gender ideology our kids in danger? i see our panel thrash this one out next. and tomorrow's newspaper front pages back .

soon tomorrow's due out on the media. more front pages in the times is leading with today's nhs deal as the unions backed the 5% pay rise for over million health care workers. but the telegraph with jeremy hunt back work drive being threatened labour as the shadow chancellor rachel reeves prepares for a tax raid on to 2

million pension pots that could be what we have around the corner as if staff had back now the businessman and activist adam brookes the tory shaun bailey and author and broadcaster amy now the ideology debate rages on, but have things taken a more sinister two turn when young schoolgirls are being put at risk in the same sex spaces? furious parents have slammed a secondary school in coventry , its raft of unisex coventry, its raft of unisex toilets, which they claim, is allowing boys to photograph and film girls in the cubicles. allowing boys to photograph and film girls in the cubicles . one film girls in the cubicles. one teenage girl was injured when a male classmate allegedly kicked down a toilet door while she was inside. now bosses at calvert and castle school say every cubicle has working log, but parents insist students are continually breaking them off. one worried mum of a 13 year old girl at the school said, boys go in and take photos of the girls kick the doors down. and there are no locks on the door. so

they're going to the cubicles to take photos, videos, which is a massive concern. so does inclusivity and gender ideology endanger the safety of not women? but now vulnerable young girls at school. amy, nicole . girls at school. amy, nicole. well, no, because by law, schools have have boys toilet. girls and then they can have unisex toilets. also unisex toilets with predominantly brought into combat bullying, which was happening in single toilets . and in this case, the toilets. and in this case, the trouble is, with a bully, a horrible and i would be more concerned . but it wouldn't be concerned. but it wouldn't be able to happen, would it, if there. what you don't think he'd go in a different toilet like the girls. the problem is. but you also see unicef at school is a terrible thing and that's what the school is a terrible thing. but you must understand that there particular there are particular vulnerabilities in certain spaces yet being toilets and being gymnasium, changing is because that is where the female

will take off. by law, they still have those spaces. however, we now also sometimes have unisex as well. this is the problem here is with that boys behaviour and actually the fact that a boy would want to do that type of violence with girls is a thing we need to address the behaviour boys, our schools. behaviour of boys, our schools. but than a unisex but rather than a unisex like these unisex becoming , these unisex toilets becoming, an got to say , agree an issue i've got to say, agree with amy first and foremost, we like the fact that a unisex toilets don't excuse behaviour of these boys. absent parents bad habits and they must be deau bad habits and they must be dealt with and they must be deau dealt with and they must be dealt harshly because feels dealt with harshly because feels like misogynistic attack . and like a misogynistic attack. and it to believe matter it leads me to believe no matter these girls were in relation to these girls were in relation to these particular boys, they wouldn't that to wouldn't be safe. that needs to be fixed. having that, i think unisex toilets send a message about safe space for women. now being in the toilets is a vulnerable space, and i personally don't like sharing the toilet and women. i'm pretty sure that they want to share with me. we don't exactly. so i think actually we shouldn't have

unisex toilets. we should we should separate sexes. that should separate the sexes. that point. boys as point. i have unisex boys as well and give people well like boy and give people actually. brookes a actually. but adam brookes had a school. it's just like school. it's just it's just like itake school. it's just it's just like i take risk just to be. you are again say how many times after i've got two daughters? you ask a million fathers of young daughters whether they would rather the school have separated toilets or unisex toilets. and i'm telling you 99.9% of families say i'd rather than have their own toilets. that's for a reason. it's not just safety , it's about feeling safety, it's about feeling comfortable women feeling comfortable women feeling comfortable . girls feeling comfortable. girls feeling comfortable. girls feeling comfortable. i've been in enough places with unisex toilets and spoken to women colleagues , spoken to women colleagues, women friends or family members. they do not feel comfortable in those toilets. it's toilet noises are not nice. we all we all do that. but you don't want to hear someone of the opposite sex. you know, i've got to say , sex. you know, i've got to say, just taken your serve as as a father and i grow up . so. but

father and i grow up. so. but the key thing sorry to interrupt you is when particularly young girls, school age girls are deaung girls, school age girls are dealing with that period. yeah. that's actually to be i mean to me one i will do i'm a parent to a son and i would hope that my son would never behave like that if this happened in the 60 it would have been the 60th the seventies if we'd mixed toilets, then young boys inexcusable you can't excuse it. and it's going to happen. but it's going on with teenage boys and with those, again, ten less than 1% of the population identify as trans. all of that far less than 1. why a 99 point whatever% having to change their ways and why what genders or policies forced upon 99.2 to accommodate less than 1% because this was brought in because of bullying and there's so much stuff that goes on in girls toilets. i think i think this is basically can't behave in toilets. but look i had to talk about the smp tonight. so me move on because when the snp were forced to

announce that their membership had dropped by a third, they probably thought they were over the worst of it. but step hop useless yourself . so the party useless yourself. so the party machine's choice to succeed screaming sturgeon was visiting the association of ukrainians of great britain and. in conversation with a group of women who fled the war humza decided to try and break the ice this way . okay so one question i this way. okay so one question i have is will all the men one question of how did they win it? all the men where are all the men ? that is meant to be the men? that is meant to be the first minister of scotland, folks interviewed after useless , youssef said they of course were right be saying to me that for many of them their families not able to make it. i don't any of the women were at all offended or upset mean sean bailey this bloke is a dream he's gift to the tories and the

labour party as hypocrites. got to say he is abso lutely not up to say he is abso lutely not up to this job. not one of them is like the snp will miss nicola sturgeon so much when they missed out on what i believe was a far better candidate and, by the way, their membership figures this what i love the scottish people on the whole without good honest and their membership have slumped membership figures have slumped so much. do you know why? i mean, do you know why? because go mean, do you know why? because 9° 9° mean, do you know why? because go go broke. and the snp membership, a third of them, a third of them since nicola sturgeon went down this ridiculous path. oh trans extreme ism have said we don't want to be a member of your party anymore , so let us know . party anymore, so let us know. no, no, it's not actually. since the last time. i don't know. this is the last. they publicly announce their membership back, right? it was well over. i make . and they denied it. they said oh we're very close. no, no. today they've to admit it. there are about 70,000 over 30,000 members have have walked with their wallets and they will not

support the mockery of this. let's just remember, this is the same guy that was the transport minister and didn't have car insurance . he's an minister and didn't have car insurance. he's an idiot. minister and didn't have car insurance . he's an idiot. yeah, insurance. he's an idiot. yeah, yeah , an idiot. he would be a yeah, an idiot. he would be a gift to those of us like me. he's the one supposed alive, and he off the scooter, which i played along to labour as well. that's the only thing they give to the real thing is that the scottish labour party will be excite. yes, of course. but look at end of the day a, labour at the end of the day a, labour government clearly a very thing for country. but we have to for this country. but we have to keep the union together. so putting this absolute clown as is someone that is great, like more than the labour force . more than the labour force. absolutely. can't we keep on? we keep saying the school to me now i'll fly again next act shopping took a hit when . they wouldn't took a hit when. they wouldn't allow the other candidate her name escapes me i'm sorry take for take forbes to have our own opinions in the world. well, they they were outdated. that's in opinion? well, in your. in your opinion? well, in your. i think that's in common decent pubuc i think that's in common decent public should be allowed to

public life should be allowed to have i think have an opinion. and i think what wrong with the very good news of news for? alex salmond, of course who who who is the independent bloke in scotland who go down the who doesn't want go down the work path. i can shaun work path. i mean can shaun bailey, adam brooks do survive. coming up, was donald trump wrong his wrong claim the queen kissed his in a new book we'll discuss donald's latest memorial outfit as we reveal the last, greatest person and union of the week. but next in, i'm cancelled as gary lineker, his agent, he had a, quote, special arranged ment with the bbc to allow tweets political issues like migration why does this fading footballer think he deserves any special treatment from the state broadcaster on fleet street liaison kelvin mackenzie has lot to say on this. he thinks the bbc director general has to go now and i want to know why we weren't told about this. lots to unpick kelvin mackenzie here live with me in just 2 minutes time .

and time now for cancelled . and and time now for cancelled. and this is where britain's telecom entities speak out on controversial without the fear of the cancel culture sweeping the rights of the media. now gary lineker his agent a snivelling column defending the disgraced bbc presenter over his disgusting bob in of all places you guessed i the leftie rag the new statesman . and he shockingly new statesman. and he shockingly revealed that gobby gary had a quote spare agreement with the bbc director—general tim davie to tweet about refugees and migration because of his passionate interest in the issue . but what i want to know is why we weren't about this secret deal between lineker and the bbc's james. surely, surely this now makes tim position at the beeb on. joining me tonight discuss is former editor of the sun kelvin mackenzie kelvin

dodgy deals made behind doors between the bbc boss and its biggest presenter. can you believe this is how state broadcaster is being run ? no, broadcaster is being run? no, it's shocking and it also makes him a complete idiot, davie, because in the end of the day he also also stood lineker . but also also stood lineker. but this appears be happening all over the place. i mean there was a guy on on the media show on on radio four today who was a senior bbc guy saying . this kind senior bbc guy saying. this kind of arrangement goes on over the place. it goes on with alan sugan place. it goes on with alan sugar, by the way, who right now is not allowed to say the thing because he's on the apprentice but he is allowed to say political and there is literally an agreement between everybody what is going on. so yeah so got this great pain. jan durham , the this great pain. jan durham, the director general, walking around to say , yes, you can talk about to say, yes, you can talk about refugees as you over there can

talk about over there . nothing talk about over there. nothing to labour from you . it is to labour from you. it is ludicrous . and actually the ludicrous. and actually the reality is we are shareholders it's our money. nobody has the right to hand out patronage on certain subjects and i, i give it to lineker right. he all he's saying is actually i know john holmes . saying is actually i know john holmes. right. that what is the right that's the 100% the agent. but what he writes will turn out to be 101. true, right . he but what he writes will turn out to be 101. true, right. he is a very clever rather straightforward agent, actually they resolve it, but it's not many of those know it. now, you're quite right. know you won't you won't find him on housing benefit. having been having been lineker's agent now for just trying to look out 42 years so you know he but are extraordinary things and he he did say to them he did say to them if you suspend him there

will be nothing but trouble about all this. so he was right about all this. so he was right about that as well. but why davie do that, knowing that he had given this undertaking to lineker in the first race? what has the director general to say to his freelance staffs or if hmrc have their employing staff ? you can say this, but you can't say that, or if you're in the in the golden to circle within the bbc , you're done for, within the bbc, you're done for, you know . it within the bbc, you're done for, you know. it is this kind of which is completely and makes my view davie complete the wrong man to lead this corporation. we need somebody who is used to actually say this is what we're going to do and go and do it. and what we have in davie is somebody who actually bends it the knee, depending on how famous or how much use you are to the. and that is wrong. i'm

not in favour of alan sugar being given any rights . i'm sure being given any rights. i'm sure there's lots of people who could do the apprentice just as well as alastair sugar. i've got nothing against him. i am against the idea that people are that there is a director general of our country on 3 billion of our revenues going round to people and saying you can say this you can't say that it's ridiculous. exactly you want to work for the bbc . you can't work for the bbc. you can't express your political opinions. it's as basic as that . what it's as basic as that. what i find so naive here from tim davie is that he thought, oh, it's okay to let lineker tweet about migration because he's passionate about it. kelvin it's possibly the most divisive of political issue of the decade. it well determine who wins the next general . the bloke must be next general. the bloke must be stupid out of what i think is clearly out of his depth. after all, he was considered a safe pair of hands. we came from the

commercial side of the bbc actually turned out to be an unsafe pair of hands. and what also me is there must have been colleagues. in fact, i know this colleagues. in fact, i know this colleagues because because on the on the media show today the guy admitted it right must be god there are colleagues out there who all know that these under takings and these gifts from above have been handed . so from above have been handed. so there's a kind of there's a kind of mafia running the thing saying, do you think you ought to be able to say to emily maitlis letter talk about that issue involving trees being cut down her road. she feels very strongly about it or or or the lineker position . lineker is lineker position. lineker is a disaster for the bbc. it's disaster for the bbc. it's disaster for the bbc. it's disaster for people like you and i and a lot of the country and. and davie responsible for it strongly about something so well we feel strongly about something, but but the difference is ordinary people

are not paying your wages. oh, my. absolutely. and davie said that impartiality was going to be the sin true part of his right. well, he's failed now, so he's got to go kelvin mackenzie. we will speak . monday night. we will speak. monday night. thank you. come on. have a brilliant weekend. but it's time now to reveal today's greatest and you need jackass jackass by superstar patton which had adam brooks who is your gb nominee my gb nominees gallagher for calling out and demanding the banning trophy hunting and the importation of related things , importation of related things, killing animals for fun is abhorrent and disgusting in. my view i can't stand liam gallagher with that story . gallagher with that story. another day i sean bailey your nominee my nominee for great britain is winner of channel falls . the piano watching falls. the piano watching i played the bbc was actually awe inspiring because she blind and neurodivergent this hasn't stopped her most in her craft . stopped her most in her craft. she played a piece in the final

that's very hard to master. so we have a little look at this piece . piece. oh, wow. that's the first time i've seen that absolute lutely mindblowing. incredible amy knockout your greatest britain nominee. well, it's that's also going to blow your mind so lot of big names have come out and support of the strikes and today who should be on the picket line on the nuj strikes but hilton amy you'll be actually dishonest aren't you ? the stars are aren't you? the stars are clearly not blind for workers rights . okay i clearly not blind for workers rights. okay i think you're being intellectually dishonest here because from what i'm told, was turning up for a radio interview . and there she is and interview. and there she is and the strike just happened to be there . the duty and but i mean,

there. the duty and but i mean, she has got it up on their twitter page. so can we just be honest about it? she's not. paris hilton was coincidental she bumped into the nuj picket line and i found it quite funny. okay that's not a winner. but look, got to go with sure look, i've got to go with sure and lucy the, winner of bbc's piano ought to be blind autistic play piano ought to be blind autistic play like that. what a super talent. yeah adam brooks, your union and mine is the mayor of london sadiq khan for his hypocritical tweets criticising . the government for costing people , for hitting people in people, for hitting people in the pockets when he's ulez expansion he's doing just that is unnecessary and it should be scrapped . yeah, it really should scrapped. yeah, it really should be. i shaun bailey, who ran very close, didn't you, shaun to be the mayor of london could have been. who's your nominee ? my been. who's your nominee? my nominee is tick tock. it's been from government officials phones because it's a security risk but

also should be banned from the phones our children lots of the content there is anti—west anti us certainly anti—american and i think if it's not good enough for government funds , it's not for government funds, it's not good enough for your child's vote . i mean, to call your vote. i mean, to call your nominee. well, following perhaps in the footsteps of prince harry, vying to outsell harry, maybe vying to outsell his fiction book is donald trump , who is selling his book for £89 per copy and has mentioned in it that when he met our late queen, he she kissed his. that's and yeah. what what did you what did you make of that typical donald really. but he is absolutely i'm not looking forward to reading that book but it is it should be interesting he's done a bit of a prince harry has a name. yeah really has he's actually listed all the people. i thought be interesting to ask you how you feel about it

though dan because you know you had a bit of an issue when prince harry the dirt so how did you feel about donald doing it. oh what? i want to oh do you know what? i want to see letters, but i don't see the letters, but i don't think called i don't think it's a cool thing to do. wow thank you so much. i've moved. i've moved it. it's the weight. thank you so much. my coming here. am i going to choose sadiq khan because it's going to be sadiq khan.thank because it's going to be sadiq khan. thank so much for your company. all thank you. to amy nichol, shaun bailey adam nichol, shaun bailey and adam brooks back monday night brooks to i am back monday night at 9 pm. have a brilliant weekend headline. this is next. good night .

good evening you with gb news a moment headlines. but first let's bring you the latest news headlines. and tonight, the former home secretary has warned there's a culture of collusion in order to target boris johnson speaking to gb news priti questioned the fairness in approach of some mps investigate claims that the former prime minister misled parliament over parties. she also spoke of her concerns that civil servant sue gray, who on events at number 10 has now been hired to work for the labour party . ms. patel says the labour party. ms. patel says it's putting democracy in a very bad . so i think there has to be bad. so i think there has to be some serious questions also

about