away . away. hello, it's me again. laser in for nigel for one night only. again this evening we have for you an exclusive story on a report that claims to discredit the body that approves covid vaccines. the ecofascists are trying to ruin our weekend again, and we'll have one of them on later to talk about it. and i'll discuss the cancelling of the late, great p.g. wodehouse. but before all of that, get news with that, let's get the news with polly middlehurst . good

that, let's get the news with polly middlehurst. good evening. the top— polly middlehurst. good evening. the top stories— polly middlehurst. good evening. the top stories on— polly middlehurst. good evening. the top stories on gb— 3: good evening. the top stories on gb news tonight.— the top stories on gb news tonight. ms.— the top stories on gb news tonight. msp colin beattie has resigned— tonight. msp colin beattie has resigned as— tonight. msp colin beattie has resigned as snp_ tonight. msp colin beattie has resigned as snp treasurer and from— resigned as snp treasurer and from holyroods_ resigned as snp treasurer and from holyroods public audit committee— from holyroods public audit committee until a police investigation— committee until a police investigation is concluded . it investigation is concluded. it after— investigation is concluded. it comes after he— investigation is concluded. it comes after he was arrested in connection— comes after he was arrested in connection with— comes after he was arrested in connection with a— comes after he was arrested in connection with a probe police investigate— connection with a probe police investigate into _ connection with a probe police investigate into the party's nneneee— investigate into the party's nneneee .— investigate into the party's finances . mr— investigate into the party's finances . mr beattie is the finances. mr beattie is the second— finances. mr beattie is the second person— finances. mr beattie is the second person to have been questioned— second person to have been queenenee ny— second person to have been questioned by detectives who are trying— questioned by detectives who are nine ne— questioned by detectives who are trying to establish— questioned by detectives who are trying to establish how more men— trying to establish how more than £600,000— trying to establish how more than £600,000 given in donations,— than £600,000 given in donations, loans and set aside for en— donations, loans and set aside for an independence referendum has for an independence referendum nee been— for an independence referendum nee been need.— for an independence referendum has been used. first minister of samene— has been used. first minister of scotland, humza_ has been used. first minister of scotland, humza yousaf has eneenee,— scotland, humza yousaf has tweeted, following the resignation— tweeted, following the resignation ,- tweeted, following the resignation , offering his thanks resignation, offering his thanks and resignation, offering his thanks ene ending— resignation, offering his thanks and ending ,— resignation, offering his thanks and adding , the— resignation, offering his thanks and adding , the decision has and adding, the decision has in ne— and adding, the decision has come in the best— and adding, the decision has come in the best interests of ne— come in the best interests of nne penn— come in the best interests of nne penny. nne— come in the best interests of the party. the prime minister nee— the party. the prime minister nee engen— the party. the prime minister has urged unionists in northern netene— has urged unionists in northern neeene ne— has urged unionists in northern ireland to return— has urged unionists in northern ireland to return to stormont, saying— ireland to return to stormont, saying restoring— ireland to return to stormont, saying restoring devolved institutions— saying restoring devolved institutions is— saying restoring devolved institutions is the best way forward.— institutions is the best way forward. rishi_ institutions is the best way forward. rishi sunak was speaking— forward. rishi sunak was speaking alongside other world tenden— speaking alongside other world leaders in— speaking alongside other world leaders in belfast to mark 25 years— leaders in belfast to mark 25 years snee— leaders in belfast to mark 25 years since the— leaders in belfast to mark 25 years since the signing of the need— years since the signing of the good friday— years since the signing of the good friday agreement. former us

president— good friday agreement. former us president neu— good friday agreement. former us president bill clinton is repented— president bill clinton is renenee ne— president bill clinton is reported to have said that it's time— reported to have said that it's time ne— reported to have said that it's time to gen— reported to have said that it's time to get this— reported to have said that it's time to get this show on the need— time to get this show on the need .— time to get this show on the need . new— time to get this show on the need . new e— time to get this show on the road . now a home office lawyer road. now a home office lawyer nee— road. now a home office lawyer nee ene— road. now a home office lawyer nee end ene— road. now a home office lawyer has said the government's eennenne— has said the government's estimating and— has said the government's estimating and preparing for snow— estimating and preparing for seeee people— estimating and preparing for 56,000 people to arrive in the uk by— 56,000 people to arrive in the uk by ennu— 56,000 people to arrive in the uk by small boats this year. nnen-e— uk by small boats this year. nnen-e un— uk by small boats this year. that's up from _ uk by small boats this year. that's up from nearly 46,000 in zon— that's up from nearly 46,000 in zon- nne— that's up from nearly 46,000 in 2022. the home— that's up from nearly 46,000 in 2022. the home office is currently— 2022. the home office is currently accommodating almost noeoo— currently accommodating almost noeoo asylum— currently accommodating almost 110,000 asylum seekers, almost 50,000— 110,000 asylum seekers, almost 50,000 en— 110,000 asylum seekers, almost 50,000 of whom _ 110,000 asylum seekers, almost 50,000 of whom are in hotels at a 50,000 of whom are in hotels at n enn— 50,000 of whom are in hotels at a new eeen— 50,000 of whom are in hotels at a nanny eeen en— 50,000 of whom are in hotels at a daily cost of £6— 50,000 of whom are in hotels at a daily cost of £6 million. if ene— a daily cost of £6 million. if the estimate— a daily cost of £6 million. if the estimate is— a daily cost of £6 million. if the estimate is accurate, that win— the estimate is accurate, that win nake— the estimate is accurate, that will take the _ the estimate is accurate, that will take the total number of migrants— will take the total number of migrants supported by the newer— migrants supported by the nexpeyen .— migrants supported by the nexpeyen . ne— migrants supported by the taxpayer . to between 120 and taxpayer. to between 120 and neoeoo— taxpayer. to between 120 and neoeoo people.— taxpayer. to between 120 and 140,000 people. labour is accusing— 140,000 people. labour is accusing the _ 140,000 people. labour is accusing the government of denying— accusing the government of denying ineiiee— accusing the government of denying justice to the victims of need— denying justice to the victims of infected blood— denying justice to the victims of infected blood between 1970 eni— of infected blood between 1970 end inni— of infected blood between 1970 and 1991. thousands of people were infected— and 1991. thousands of people were infected with hiv and neneiiiie— were infected with hiv and hepatitis after— were infected with hiv and hepatitis after being given contaminated— hepatitis after being given contaminated blood products . in contaminated blood products. in an inienin— contaminated blood products. in an interim report,— contaminated blood products. in an interim report, the chair of ine— an interim report, the chair of ine inquiry— an interim report, the chair of the inquiry recommended that

nepeniiene— the inquiry recommended that reparations should be extended to reparations should be extended ie ineinie— reparations should be extended to include bereaved parents and eniiinen— to include bereaved parents and eniiinen .— to include bereaved parents and children . and— to include bereaved parents and children . and cabinet office children. and cabinet office iiinieien— children. and cabinet office minister jeremy— children. and cabinet office minister jeremy quin told the commons— minister jeremy quin told the commons ine— minister jeremy quin told the commons the government is considered— commons the government is considered eyeing the recommendations . the recommendations. the conservative - recommendations. the conservative mp sir robert immane— conservative mp sir robert buckland, has— conservative mp sir robert buckland, has urged the protest group— buckland, has urged the protest 9roup insi— buckland, has urged the protest 9roup inei sien— buckland, has urged the protest group just stop oil, not to innuen— group just stop oil, not to iiennpi ine— group just stop oil, not to disrupt the upcoming london iieninen— disrupt the upcoming london iieninen ii— disrupt the upcoming london marathon it comes after members of ine— marathon it comes after members on ine group— marathon it comes after members of the group interrupted play at the of the group interrupted play at ine inni— of the group interrupted play at the world snooker championships in sneiiieii— the world snooker championships in sheffield this— the world snooker championships in sheffield this week by spending— in sheffield this week by spreading orange powder across penden— spreading orange powder across pcnien acces— spreading orange powder across powder across one— spreading orange powder across powder across one of the tables in piny— powder across one of the tables in play eni— powder across one of the tables in play and delaying the start of ine— in play and delaying the start of ine crani— in play and delaying the start of the grand national by going ence— of the grand national by going cnic ine— of the grand national by going onto the track.— of the grand national by going onto the track. sir— of the grand national by going onto the track. sir robert told cicne — onto the track. sir robert told cicne i>e — onto the track. sir robert told gloria de piero_ onto the track. sir robert told gloria de piero disrupt action is eiccinieiy— gloria de piero disrupt action is absolutely unnecessary . we is absolutely unnecessary. we can-i— is absolutely unnecessary. we cen-i inink— is absolutely unnecessary. we can't think of— is absolutely unnecessary. we can't think of anything worse inan— can't think of anything worse inen e— can't think of anything worse than a protestor_ can't think of anything worse than a protestor disrupting what is onen— than a protestor disrupting what is often charitable fundraising. so, is often charitable fundraising. so. you— is often charitable fundraising. so. you knew— is often charitable fundraising. so. you knew .— is often charitable fundraising. so. you knew . ny— is often charitable fundraising. so, you know , my plea- is often charitable fundraising. so, you know, my plea to them is, look, think again , please, is, look, think again, please, guys. you know, make your point , but don't make it in a way that upsets and disrupts much loved events like the marathon .

loved events like the marathon. and lastly, the supermarket ginni— and lastly, the supermarket eieni ieecc— and lastly, the supermarket giant tesco says it plans to appen— giant tesco says it plans to appeal ener— giant tesco says it plans to appeal after lidl won a high conn— appeal after lidl won a high court battle— appeal after lidl won a high court battle over branding . lidl court battle over branding. lidl argued— court battle over branding. lidl argued ieccc-c— court battle over branding. lidl argued tesco's use of a yellow cincie— argued tesco's use of a yellow cincie en— argued tesco's use of a yellow cincie on ice— argued tesco's use of a yellow circle on its clubcard was an innineeneni— circle on its clubcard was an infringement of— circle on its clubcard was an infringement of their main store icec. — infringement of their main store ice a— infringement of their main store l090- a judge— infringement of their main store logo. a judge found in favour of neu— logo. a judge found in favour of iiii agreeing— logo. a judge found in favour of lidl agreeing it— logo. a judge found in favour of lidl agreeing it was a violation of incin— lidl agreeing it was a violation of their trademark rights and ccpyneni— of their trademark rights and copvright right— of their trademark rights and copvright right -_ of their trademark rights and copyright right . that's it from copyright right. that's it from gb copyright right. that's it from en newc— copyright right. that's it from en newc- iii— copyright right. that's it from gb news. i'll be— copyright right. that's it from gb news. i'll be back in an nonn— gb news. i'll be back in an ncnn inn— gb news. i'll be back in an hour. this is— gb news. i'll be back in an hour. this is britain's news. channel kyiv - channel- kyiv conspiracy cnennei— kyiv conspiracy theorists or ccncpincye — kyiv conspiracy theorists or conspiracy? e conspiracy? fabulists. as i like to call them. seeing as most of their predictions have an uncanny habit of coming true , uncanny habit of coming true, have a phrase about how the regime are going to go about the slow business of holding their hands up to the catastroph failed public health experiment

of the last three years. they call it a limited hangout. cia spy call it a limited hangout. cia spy jargon for when the veil of secrecy is shredded, the government is caught with its pants down and the phoney cover story can no longer be relied upon to misinform the public. governments resort to admitting, sometimes even voluntary , during sometimes even voluntary, during sometimes even voluntary, during some of the truth, while still managing to withhold and managing to withhold key and damaging facts , hoping that the damaging facts, hoping that the pubuc damaging facts, hoping that the public intrigued by this public is so intrigued by this new information they fail new information that they fail to old matter to its to pursue the old matter to its conclusion. now the sceptical side of the covid argument seems to be split fairly evenly between two groups. the ups who maintain that the whole sorry affair was giant up from the affair was a giant up from the start, that these start, believing that these pesky were their pesky politicians were their tiny would struggle to tiny acas would struggle to organise an organise the opening of an envelope and conspiracy envelope and the conspiracy theorists believe that the theorists who believe that the whole affair is the whole sorry affair is the machination of globalist elites who to have cooked who have alleged to have cooked up in a chinese lab to up covid in a chinese lab to necessitate a vaccine which could turn in could then be used to turn in turn to bring in vaccine passports swiftly followed by digital ending freedom digital ids. thus ending freedom as it, and turning us as we know it, and turning us all battery farmed, useless

all into battery farmed, useless eaters grateful free eaters, grateful for our free plate of gruel three times a day. never to see a mediterranean sunset ever again. or indeed, ever. i was interested , therefore, to read interested, therefore, to read the report published today by perseus, compiled by a multidisciplinary team of experts from various fields, including medicine, safety management and pharmaceutical regulation. it doesn't really matter which camp up or conspiracy theory one falls into. this is titled safe and effective question mark. the report has in its sights the much maligned mhra tasked with ensuring the safety and efficacy of medications used in the uk . of medications used in the uk. the report is brutal and if indeedit the report is brutal and if indeed it is, as many will suspect, part of a limited hangout, it's certainly lets a lot hang out going further than before in shredding the veil of secrecy and highlighting the reckless idiocy of our besieged health regulator. it concludes that the mhra has failed in its duty to protect the public from harm. it states that the mhra did not require the mrna alchemist to demonstrate their

concoctions long term safety. it failed to act promptly on widespread reports of adverse reactions to these so—called vaccines, having labelled the mrna gene therapies vaccines in order to fulfil lower regulated requirements in the first place, it failed to address the problems with manufacturing quality and control, leading to the now famous batch quality problems that so many of the vaccine injured associate with their particular post—jab suffering. and it did not act on the grave concerns raised about the grave concerns raised about the withdrawn oxford the quietly withdrawn oxford astrazeneca potion . do you astrazeneca potion. do you remember that one? the one which brought the vaccine passported wimbledon to its feet in wimbledon tennis to its feet in worship of the vaccine's creator, a potion which has in some cases left in its wake blood clots, heart inflammation , neurological conditions, immune downgrade and menstrual disorders. among hundreds of other side effects , which it other side effects, which it calls the report for the immediate cessation of all of these so—called vaccines. until a thorough inaya investigation takes place and yet again, us conspiracy factual lists are proved right for the 100th

bleeping time it will take many years for society to come to terms with the evil meted out on us as quacks or crooks , us as quacks or crooks, depending on which side of the up conspiracy argument you fall on. fumbled in the dark for a miracle cure for the covid cold. people are still reeling and hindsight is not as sharp as someday it will surely become as this limited hangout becomes rather more permanent . but i rather more permanent. but i raise this as there are pressing lessons to be learned from the covid times that can be used wisely . today, the same models, wisely. today, the same models, the same rushed solutions which to led the covid catastrophe are being used by the same bad actors the same fear mongers actors and the same fear mongers to another hoax. the to push another hoax. the so—called emergency so—called climate emergency fairy tale horror stories of what is to come if we don't go for net zero carbon this time. instead of net zero covid the fearful and controlling among us, envious of our freedom and satisfaction life, we use satisfaction in life, we use exactly same strategies as exactly the same strategies as they with covid leech they did with covid to leech away via the climate away our liberty via the climate hoax.

away our liberty via the climate hoax . so as i said, it doesn't hoax. so as i said, it doesn't matter which side of the argument one is on, if we want any semblance of a return to a good life, it is incumbent on us to remember those disastrous times and learn from them and swear never ever again with me is the author of this report, hedley reece , managing director hedley reece, managing director of farmer flow limited and author of the perseus report . author of the perseus report. hedley, why did you write the report? first of all, can i just say it struck me that it felt like the mhra had just sort of wandered away from covid after after the disaster of the last couple of years. yes, they did . couple of years. yes, they did. it couple of years. yes, they did. ii ween-i— couple of years. yes, they did. ii ween-i inci— couple of years. yes, they did. it wasn't just me— couple of years. yes, they did. it wasn't just me that- itizi. $33”; yes, they did. it wasn't just me that wrote the repen— it wasn't just me that wrote the recon ,— it wasn't just me that wrote the recon , ini— it wasn't just me that wrote the recon , in ice— it wasn't just me that wrote the report , but it's a— it wasn't just me that wrote the report , but it's a very powerful report, but it's a very powerful cciieciicn— report, but it's a very powerful collection of— report, but it's a very powerful collection of individuals with specific— collection of individuals with specific skills— collection of individuals with specific skills around the whole life specific skills around the whole iiie cwcie— specific skills around the whole iiie cwcie ci— specific skills around the whole life cycle of medicines and drug ieweicnneni— life cycle of medicines and drug ieweicpneni .— life cycle of medicines and drug development . but— life cycle of medicines and drug development . but but i've been development. but but i've been ceiiine— development. but but i've been ceiiine eni— development. but but i've been calling out the— development. but but i've been calling out the industry for inan— calling out the industry for more than ten— calling out the industry for more than ten years. the inducin— more than ten years. the industry business model, where new— industry business model, where new newe— industry business model, where they have outsourced all the pnweicei— they have outsourced all the physical activities required to

manufacture— physical activities required to manufacture and develop and newei— manufacture and develop and newei ewes. — manufacture and develop and market drugs. so— manufacture and develop and market drugs. so they the big incine— market drugs. so they the big incine ic— market drugs. so they the big pharma is no— market drugs. so they the big pharma is no big— market drugs. so they the big pharma is no big is not big cnncnew ii— pharma is no big is not big anymore. it just— pharma is no big is not big anymore. it just patents molecules. _ anymore. it just patents molecules. and then sells the ewes.— molecules. and then sells the wines. nui— molecules. and then sells the wines. nwi ine— molecules. and then sells the drugs. but the piece in the niiiie— drugs. but the piece in the middle, the— drugs. but the piece in the middle, the vital piece is in ine— middle, the vital piece is in we nenic— middle, the vital piece is in the hands of— middle, the vital piece is in the hands of contractors . so the hands of contractors. so wnei-c— the hands of contractors. so wnei-c been— the hands of contractors. so what's been happening is there newe— what's been happening is there newe been— what's been happening is there have been less— what's been happening is there have been less and less drugs ccnine— have been less and less drugs conning ic— have been less and less drugs coming to market— have been less and less drugs coming to market over the last 30 coming to market over the last so weee— coming to market over the last 30 years, principally because if you— 30 years, principally because if we wen— 30 years, principally because if wow wow newen-i— 30 years, principally because if you you haven't got contractors wirn— you you haven't got contractors wiin enn— you you haven't got contractors wiin en in— you you haven't got contractors with skin in the _ you you haven't got contractors with skin in the game , you can't with skin in the game, you can't ecrweiiw— with skin in the game, you can't actually control— with skin in the game, you can't actually control it— with skin in the game, you can't actually control it in the way iner— actually control it in the way we wen-i — actually control it in the way that you'd want— actually control it in the way that you'd want to. so in my eeiineie— that you'd want to. so in my eeiineie in— that you'd want to. so in my estimate in these gene therapies , ine— estimate in these gene therapies , rne ieei— estimate in these gene therapies , the last chance— estimate in these gene therapies , the last chance saloon for big inerne— , the last chance saloon for big inerrne in— , the last chance saloon for big pharma in 2017,— , the last chance saloon for big pharma in 2017, novartis iewncnei— pharma in 2017, novartis launched a— pharma in 2017, novartis launched a drug called kim rye launched a drug called kiln rye for launched a drug called kim rye icr ee— launched a drug called kim rye icr ee e— launched a drug called kim rye icr ee e gene— launched a drug called kim rye for as a gene therapy for a rare niece— for as a gene therapy for a rare niece cencer— for as a gene therapy for a rare blood cancer they— for as a gene therapy for a rare blood cancer they called car—t cancer's $470,000 _ blood cancer they called car—t cancer's $470,000 for one ireeineni. — cancer's $470,000 for one treatment. it— cancer's $470,000 for one treatment. it just not salad ciner— treatment. it just not salad one gene— treatment. it just not salad other gene therapies have come to other gene therapies have come re newer. — other gene therapies have come to market. some— other gene therapies have come to market. some a— other gene therapies have come to market. some a million you

knew,— to market. some a million you know, 600,000. _ to market. some a million you know, 600,000. they're not eeiiine— know, 600,000. they're not selling obviously. why is that so selling obviously. why is that ec ciwicweiw— selling obviously. why is that so obviously, as— selling obviously. why is that so obviously, as we move renewi— so obviously, as we move icrweri, i— so obviously, as we move forward, i think- so obviously, as we move forward, i think one of the big nrciiene— forward, i think one of the big problems that— forward, i think one of the big problems that we have had during the problems that we have had during rne cowo— problems that we have had during rne covin ee— problems that we have had during the covm era is— problems that we have had during the covid era is one size fits eii. — the covid era is one size fits eii. iwerwcne— the covid era is one size fits all. everyone has- the covid era is one size fits all. everyone has to - the covid era is one size fits all. everyone has to have a vaccine. depends on what age you are. and all this sort of stuff. we want to move towards a system of personalised health care, don't we really? what we don't we really? is that what we want? well, can't because want? well, we can't because eiiii— want? well, we can't because we're still stuck— , well, we can't because we're still stuck with a supply cnein— we're still stuck with a supply chain, manufacturers. chain, which is manufacturers. cnenicei— chain, which is manufacturers. chemical companies, biologics ccrneninee— chemical companies, biologics companies who— chemical companies, biologics companies who make the drug they supply— companies who make the drug they ewppiw cnen— companies who make the drug they ewppiw rnen ic— companies who make the drug they ewppiw rnen re ine— companies who make the drug they supply them to the wholesale distributors— supply them to the wholesale distributors ,_ supply them to the wholesale distributors , and— supply them to the wholesale distributors , and they also sell distributors, and they also sell inen — distributors, and they also sell inen ince— distributors, and they also sell them into the— distributors, and they also sell them into the wholesale distributors. _ them into the wholesale distributors. from them, then distributors. so from them, then on, distributors. so from them, then inew— distributors. so from them, then inew newe— distributors. so from them, then on, they have nothing more to do wiin— on, they have nothing more to do win win— on, they have nothing more to do with with-drugs. _ on, they have nothing more to do with with-drugs. so- on, they have nothing more to do with with drugs. so it's with with the drugs. so it's a one size fits— with with the drugs. so it's a one size fits all— with with the drugs. so it's a one size fits all system and were— one size fits all system and were ne— one size fits all system and that's one of— one size fits all system and that's one of the- one size fits all system and that's one of the big issues incre— that's one of the big issues inere ,— that's one of the big issues rnere , rrwine— that's one of the big issues there , trying to— that's one of the big issues there , trying to make it into there, trying to make it into a perecneiieei— there, trying to make it into a personalised system without cneneine— personalised system without cneneine enw— personalised system without changing any of the infrastructure or the way the intern— infrastructure or the way the industry works— infrastructure or the way the industry works . writ; industry works. were you surprised with what you what you found and what was the biggest what was the most, most important part of the report for you ? um, i think the most it, i

you? um, i think the most it, i ininw— you? um, i think the most it, i ininw ine— you? um, i think the most it, i think the report— 7 um, i think the most it, i think the report covers so many areas. you have— think the report covers so many areas. you have to— think the report covers so many areas. you have to think very cieeriw— areas. you have to think very clearly about— areas. you have to think very clearly about ._ areas. you have to think very clearly about . if— areas. you have to think very clearly about . if we look at the clearly about. if we look at the mhra,— clearly about. if we look at the iinicw inew— clearly about. if we look at the mhra, they have— clearly about. if we look at the mhra, they have three responsibilities and this is wriiien— responsibilities and this is wriiren in— responsibilities and this is written in stone in the orange eerie.— written in stone in the orange cwiie. inew— written in stone in the orange guide. they have— written in stone in the orange guide. they have to evaluate and ennrcwe— guide. they have to evaluate and approve medicines— guide. they have to evaluate and approve medicines and to do cnen— approve medicines and to do inei, wen— approve medicines and to do iner, wcw enw— approve medicines and to do that, you any company has to ewinir— that, you any company has to submit what's— that, you any company has to submit what's known as a eiecircnic— submit what's known as a electronic common technical iccwneni— electronic common technical iccwneni .— electronic common technical document . now— electronic common technical document . now there's three document. now there's three nciwiee— document. now there's three nciwiee ic— document. now there's three modules to that. _ document. now there's three modules to that. there's the cnenieirw,— modules to that. there's the chemistry, manufacturing and ccnircie— chemistry, manufacturing and ccnircie ,— chemistry, manufacturing and controls , which— chemistry, manufacturing and controls , which is the supply controls, which is the supply cnein— controls, which is the supply chain element.— controls, which is the supply chain element. so this is all ine— chain element. so this is all the companies— chain element. so this is all the companies who are making the newne— the companies who are making the making different— the companies who are making the making different parts of the ring. — making different parts of the drug- inew— making different parts of the drug. they transfer it to other ccrneninee— drug. they transfer it to other companies who— drug. they transfer it to other companies who do more and the new— companies who do more and the nexi nciwie— companies who do more and the next module is— companies who do more and the next module is the— companies who do more and the next module is the preclinical neiwie— next module is the preclinical module, which— next module is the preclinical module, which is— next module is the preclinical module, which is the safety toxicology— module, which is the safety toxicology drug— module, which is the safety toxicology drug metabolite ism . toxicology drug metabolite ism. were— toxicology drug metabolite ism. were weee— toxicology drug metabolite ism. were these modules— toxicology drug metabolite ism. were these modules pursued as the emergency authorisation of the emergency authorisation of the drugs were in? and also, can i ask you as a second question, do you have any faith in the mhra? oh, absolutely not. no.

weir— mhra? oh, absolutely not. no. weii enewer— mhra? oh, absolutely not. no. well answer the— mhra? oh, absolutely not. no. well answer the first- ii ?7 oh, absolutely not. no. well answer the first question finer.— well answer the first question rirer. inew— well answer the first question first. they ignored the cnenieirw,— first. they ignored the chemistry, manufacturing and ccnircie— chemistry, manufacturing and ccnircie-ie- chemistry, manufacturing and controls, - is - keyi controls, and that is the key eieneni— controls, and that is the key eieneni ,— controls, and that is the key element , because patients element, because what patients get element, because what patients eeilineir— element, because what patients eeilrneir enn— element, because what patients get-their arm is— element, because what patients get their arm is what's get in their arm is what's manufactured— get in their arm is what's manufactured in the supply cnein— manufactured in the supply cnein. ec— manufactured in the supply cnein. so i— manufactured in the supply chain. so it doesn't matter what icne— chain. so it doesn't matter what done in— chain. so it doesn't matter what was done in the— chain. so it doesn't matter what was done in the lab. they tested eiwn— was done in the lab. they tested eiwii in— was done in the lab. they tested eiwii in ine— was done in the lab. they tested stuff in the lab— was done in the lab. they tested stuff in the lab and— was done in the lab. they tested stuff in the lab and said, were— stuff in the lab and said, that's safe.— stuff in the lab and said, that's safe. and that's all the reeiine— that's safe. and that's all the reerine inew— that's safe. and that's all the testing they did.— that's safe. and that's all the testing they did. and i've known the testing they did. and i've known rne renni— testing they did. and i've known the mhra since— testing they did. and i've known the mhra since i— testing they did. and i've known the mhra since i co—chaired a conference in— the mhra since i co—chaired a conference in cincinnati from zero. — conference in cincinnati from zero. inw— conference in cincinnati from 2010. fda co—sponsored a conference _ 2010. fda co—sponsored a conference with- 2010. fda co—sponsored a conference with xavier iiniwereirw— conference with xavier university and fda, and we had a senior amateur— university and fda, and we had a senior amateur speaker every year— senior amateur speaker every year eni— senior amateur speaker every weer, ene inew-we— senior amateur speaker every year, and they've all left to go ince— year, and they've all left to go into consultancy— year, and they've all left to go into consultancy ._ year, and they've all left to go into consultancy . and the other into consultancy. and the other inne— into consultancy. and the other rnine weenie— into consultancy. and the other thing people should bear in mind is thing people should bear in mind ie iner— thing people should bear in mind ie we ine— thing people should bear in mind is that the mhra— thing people should bear in mind is that the mhra in 1995 lost out is that the mhra in 1995 lost our ine— is that the mhra in 1995 lost out the skills— is that the mhra in 1995 lost out the skills to _ is that the mhra in 1995 lost out the skills to approve medicines— out the skills to approve medicines because all moved to the medicines because all moved to we iwrcneen— medicines because all moved to the european medicines agency , the european medicines agency, wnicn— the european medicines agency, wnicn wee— the european medicines agency, wnicn in— the european medicines agency, which was in canary wharf in incee— which was in canary wharf in incee eewe.— which was in canary wharf in those days. so— which was in canary wharf in those days. so they lost all the erect— those days. so they lost all the eieii wnc— those days. so they lost all the staff who were _ those days. so they lost all the staff who were capable of eciweiiw— staff who were capable of actually assessing drugs and approving— actually assessing drugs and approving them. ”it; approving them. so they're not fit for purpose and they don't have anyone who can work there.

great. thanks a lot. also with me is dr. bharat pankhania , me is dr. bharat pankhania, senior clinical lecturer at university of exeter medical school. good evening. what are your thoughts on what you're heanng? your thoughts on what you're hearing? dr. i sometimes wonder why you exist , to be honest with why you exist, to be honest with you, because a lot of these things that you spew out just send things that are worrisome to people . well, not very fight, to people. well, not very fight, not to people. well, not very fight, nci ieciwei— to people. well, not very fight, nci reciwei .— to people. well, not very fight, not factual . you— to people. well, not very fight, not factual . you just- well, not very fight, not factual . you just have your not factual. you just have your eeenie. — not factual. you just have your own agenda. and— not factual. you just have your own agenda. and that's what i ininw— own agenda. and that's what i ininw wen— own agenda. and that's what i rninw wcw ee— own agenda. and that's what i think you are just— own agenda. and that's what i think you are just spewing out weer— think you are just spewing out wcwr iieeei— think you are just spewing out your biased views. think you are just spewing out your biased views . and that's your biased views. and that's new— your biased views. and that's new i— your biased views. and that's new i reei— your biased views. and that's how i feel about— your biased views. and that's how i feel about you . i wasn't how i feel about you. i wasn't eewine— how i feel about you. i wasn't asking wnei— how i feel about you. i wasn't asking what you— how i feel about you. i wasn't asking what you felt about me. i asking what you felt about me. i we— asking what you felt about me. i eeiine— asking what you felt about me. i eeking wee— asking what you felt about me. i was asking you what- asking what you felt about me. i was asking you what you- asking what you felt about me. i was asking you what you felt about the discussion i feel about the discussion i feel about you, your statements and the panellists that you brought together. was brought up on together. i was brought up on inie— together. i was brought up on inie wn— together. i was brought up on inie wn inie— g i was brought up on this, uh, this program right now rere— this, uh, this program right now rein in— this, uh, this program right now rein in going— this, uh, this program right now told i'm going to— this, uh, this program right now told i'm going to have a 1 to 1 conversation _ told i'm going to have a 1 to1 conversation with— told i'm going to have a 1 to 1 conversation with you and eweeeniw— conversation with you and eweeeniw i— conversation with you and suddenly i find- conversation with you and suddenly i find myself in a penci— suddenly i find myself in a eenei . — suddenly i find myself in a eenei . vee— suddenly i find myself in a panel. you find- suddenly i find myself in a panel . /r:::r. �*7 r: " suddenly i find myself in a panel . v/rzzr. �*7 r: " panel. you find yourself in a what? sorry in a panel

discussion— what? sorry in a panel discussion in. - 7 in a panel discussion in. v/rzzr. ”it; what? sorry in a panel- discussion in. you're not in what? sorry in a panel discussion in. you're not in a panel discussion. you're talking to me. would you defend what would you say about the findings of this report? would you say that they're concerning , they that they're concerning, they should be looked at, or would you maintain your position that everyone a liar ? i everyone else is a liar? i haven't read that e 3”7 i haven't read that report. i everyone else is a liar? i- haven't read that report. i knew neinine— haven't read that report. i knew nernine enewr— haven't read that report. i knew nothing about that report. i weeni— nothing about that report. i wasn't brought— nothing about that report. i wasn't brought on the program to rew— wasn't brought on the program to ink-ine— wasn't brought on the program to talk-the report.— talk about the report. therefore,— talk about the report. therefore, an ambush . talk about the report. - therefore,-an ambush . how therefore, it's an ambush. how do therefore, it's an ambush. how we r— therefore, it's an ambush. how we i knew— therefore, it's an ambush. how we i knew i— therefore, it's an ambush. how do i know i haven't read it? i knew— do i know i haven't read it? i knew-enewr- do i know i haven't read it? i know-about it- do i know i haven't read it? i know-about it .- do i know i haven't read it? i know about it . nothing know nothing about it. nothing enewr— know nothing about it. nothing enewr ii.— know nothing about it. nothing enewr ii. wnw— know nothing about it. nothing enewr ii. wnw — know nothing about it. nothing about it. why �*va3 know nothing about it. nothing about it. why �*var3 r:r:::r know nothing about it. nothing about it. why �*va3; cc» know nothing about it. nothing about it. why r:r:::r about it. why what do you think about it. why what do you think about the mhra, doctor ? it is a about the mhra, doctor? it is a regulatory body. it is— ii 3 if”7’ it is a regulatory body. it is staffed by regulatory body. it is staffed iw werw— regulatory body. it is staffed by very competent, very able people— by very competent, very able eeeeie wne— by very competent, very able people who have— by very competent, very able people who have served the neiien— people who have served the nation well. _ people who have served the nation well. they have done ineir— nation well. they have done ineiriei— nation well. they have done ineiriei in— nation well. they have done theirjob in being independent, ineeeeneeni— theirjob in being independent, independent of— theirjob in being independent, independent of government, and inew— independent of government, and new ee— independent of government, and new ee e— independent of government, and new ee e encer— independent of government, and they do a great job in prerecrine— they do a great job in protecting the health well—being of protecting the health well—being ei rne — protecting the health well—being ei rne neiien— protecting the health well—being of the nation with— protecting the health well—being of the nation with regards to wnicn— of the nation with regards to which medicines— of the nation with regards to which medicines are used, how inew— which medicines are used, how new ee— which medicines are used, how new weee.— which medicines are used, how they are used. and they also do

they are used. and they also do we ieiiew— they are used. and they also do we ieiiew we— they are used. and they also do the follow up work. it is very wnrenwneie— the follow up work. it is very unfortunate that— the follow up work. it is very unfortunate that further to enewr— unfortunate that further to erexirinei— unfortunate that further to brexit that we _ unfortunate that further to brexit that we are the mhra is werwine— brexit that we are the mhra is working en— brexit that we are the mhra is working en ire— brexit that we are the mhra is working on its own for the iiniiee— working on its own for the united kingdom rather than being as united kingdom rather than being ee een— united kingdom rather than being ee een er— united kingdom rather than being ee een ei ine— united kingdom rather than being as part of the european medicines— as part of the european medicines agency because there is medicines agency because there ie eirenein — medicines agency because there ie eirenein in— medicines agency because there is strength in numbers , strength is strength in numbers, strength in exeeriiee— is strength in numbers, strength in expertise, having said all inew— in expertise, having said all new ine— in expertise, having said all that, the mhra— in expertise, having said all that, the mhra is absolutely fit for that, the mhra is absolutely fit rer ewreeee— that, the mhra is absolutely fit rer ewreeee .— that, the mhra is absolutely fit for purpose . other covid for purpose. other covid vaccines, so—called vaccines, eeie— vaccines, so—called vaccines, eeie necier— vaccines, so—called vaccines, safe doctor well— vaccines, so—called vaccines, safe doctor well ,_ vaccines, so—called vaccines, safe doctor well , with respect safe doctor well, with respect to safe doctor well, with respect re ine— safe doctor well, with respect ie we nenw— safe doctor well, with respect to the many, many millions of eeeee— to the many, many millions of eeeee er— to the many, many millions of eeeee ei ine— to the many, many millions of doses of the vaccines that have been — doses of the vaccines that have been administered, we have had a few unfortunate— been administered, we have had a few unfortunate bit— been administered, we have had a few unfortunate bit side effects ene— few unfortunate bit side effects and unfortunate— few unfortunate bit side effects and unfortunate maybe some vaccine related— and unfortunate maybe some vaccine related deaths. but ewereii— vaccine related deaths. but ewereii, en— vaccine related deaths. but overall, on the— vaccine related deaths. but overall, on the balance of good versus harm , the— overall, on the balance of good versus harm , the good outweighs versus harm, the good outweighs the versus harm, the good outweighs rne nern— versus harm, the good outweighs rne nern ew— versus harm, the good outweighs rne nern iw e— versus harm, the good outweighs the harm by a large , large the harm by a large, large mergin— the harm by a large, large nerein .— the harm by a large, large margin . — the harm by a large, large margin. thank- the harm by a large, large margin . the harm by a large, large margin. wig the harm by a large, large margin . wig icy margin. thank you very, very much, doctor. you're welcome. thank you . right right. mhra

thank you. right right. mhra spokesman said no vaccine would be approved unless unless the expected high standards of safety, quality and effectiveness are met. we closely review the yellow card reports . not according to this reports. not according to this report. you don't submitted to us alongside safety data from other sources from the uk and internationally. we also work closely with our public health partners evaluate data. the partners to evaluate data. the safety and effectiveness of the covid 19 vaccines and wiped under the carpet. up next, we will go live to livid residents who are protesting against 1200 migrants being housed nearby. don't go away .

mp as well, which was around what sort of state is the country and where local residents and the local authorities . residents and the local authorities. we residents and the local authorities . we now go to ray authorities. we now go to ray aeeieen— authorities. we now go to ray aeeieen in— authorities. we now go to ray addison in bexhill_ authorities. we now go to ray addison in bexhill .- e we now go to ray addison in bexhill . for the

addison in bexhill. for the nierenre— addison in bexhill. for the migrants protest . what's migrants protest. what's happening— migrants protest. what's happening there? again what's happening— happening there? again what's neeeenine e — happening there? again what's happening 7 0hr— happening there? again what's happening ? om happening there? again what's happening? om c’3iiil”iiil happening there? again what's happening ? om mri”r:i hi happening? oh, hello there. hi incre— happening? oh, hello there. hi there, lawrence.— happening? oh, hello there. hi there, lawrence. _ happening? oh, hello there. hi there, lawrence. thanks- happening? om g�*rziizi hi there, lawrence. m there, lawrence. thanks for thanks for throwing to me. yes, i'm here in the town just outside the town hall in bexhill town square. and of course, the aim was to get 1200 people to come out and protest here this evening. unfortunately, that's mark has been missed somewhat . mark has been missed somewhat. there's about 150 people here. here who are against the housing of asylum seekers in north ii and a smaller group way behind me who are actually in support of it . now, the people who've of it. now, the people who've been organising this event, they call themselves the bricks hill elves , and of course they've elves, and of course they've been working behind the scenes to to oppose the use of nora to try to oppose the use of nora forster house 1200, mainly young male migrants who have come to this country. now sheila jacklin is from the campaign group no . is from the campaign group no. two north. she joins me now. sheila come on in. thank you very much for joining

sheila come on in. thank you very much forjoining us. now, are you disappointed by the turnout tonight? i'm not, actually. it's quite a windswept day bexhill, and isn't day in bexhill, and this isn't bad all. we might not have bad at all. we might not have got bad at all. we might not have eei ine— bad at all. we might not have gee rne nee,— bad at all. we might not have gee rne nee-i— bad at all. we might not have got the 1200,-i think- ii3r: we might not have got the 1200, i think we've got the 1200, but i think we've got the 1200, but i think we've eei mere— got the 1200, but i think we've gee cnen— got the 1200, but i think we've got more than actually got more than 120. actually i ininw— got more than 120. actually i think there's— got more than 120. actually i think there's more than that now , er— think there's more than that now , some of-claims_ think there's more than that now , some of claims that have , some of the claims that have been—people- , some of the claims that have been—people enl , some of the claims that have- been_people on social been made by by people on social neeie— been made by by people on social neeielinei— been made by by people on social media-that the— been made by by people on social media that the people who are media is that the people who are nee— media is that the people who are nere re— media is that the people who are here to demonstrate tonight are are here to demonstrate tonight are reciei. — here to demonstrate tonight are are racist. how— here to demonstrate tonight are are racist. : are racist. how would you respond to that claim? so it's quite vertical. vertical- : {3 7 so it's quite vertical. vertical even. ire— quite vertical. vertical even. ir-e rennw— quite vertical. vertical even. it's funny because they're not at it's funny because they're not er en — it's funny because they're not er en te— it's funny because they're not at all. i've lived— it's funny because they're not at all. i've lived in norman's bav— at all. i've lived in norman's new rer— at all. i've lived in norman's new rer mere— at all. i've lived in norman's bay for more than 30 years and you— bay for more than 30 years and wew knew,— bay for more than 30 years and you know, raised— bay for more than 30 years and you know, raised a— bay for more than 30 years and you know, raised a family there ene— you know, raised a family there ene i-we— you know, raised a family there and i've never— you know, raised a family there and i've never come across enri— and i've never come across racism until recently. and you neede— racism until recently. and you google nw— racism until recently. and you can google my name , you know, can google my name, you know, enewr— can google my name, you know, enewr iner— can google my name, you know, enewr we re— can google my name, you know, about that to do— can google my name, you know, about that to do with the neiennewre.— about that to do with the neighbours. but i've never ever cene-recien-i- neighbours. but i've never ever come racism i really come across racism and i really err-ecr— come across racism and i really eiieci—ineee- come across racism and i really object these people object to people. these people are object to people. these people eeee— object to people. these people good weenie— object to people. these people are good people and they're being— are good people and they're being-racists- are good people and they're being racists just being called racists just iecee— being called racists just. iecewee—wew being called racists just- because _you know, because they're white, you know, ene— because they're white, you know, ene-eiieci— because they're white, you know, and-objectlhaving - and they object to having a ieree— and they object to having a large eewiwn — and they object to having a large asylum migrant centre. so it's large asylum migrant centre. so we enecwine— large asylum migrant centre. so it's shocking and— large asylum migrant centre. so it's shocking and they're not reciei. — it's shocking and they're not reciei. se — it's shocking and they're not racist. so so— it's shocking and they're not racist. so so what- it's shocking and they're not racist. so ”r3zi it's shocking and they're not racist. so so what are people concerned about ? what do local concerned about? what do local residents tell you? are their major concerns about the use of nonh

major concerns about the use of north as a asylum accommodation? okay. well, it's a sheer numbers . ire— okay. well, it's a sheer numbers . ir-e noo— okay. well, it's a sheer numbers . it's 1200 men,— okay. well, it's a sheer numbers . it's1200 men, single men aged enewr— . it's1200 men, single men aged enewr re— . it's1200 men, single men aged enewr re re— . it's1200 men, single men aged enewr re ie no. — . it's1200 men, single men aged about 18 to 40. all— . it's1200 men, single men aged about 18 to 40. all in one piece.— about 18 to 40. all in one piece. i— about 18 to 40. all in one place. i know— about 18 to 40. all in one place. i know families are werriee— place. i know families are worried because they're worried enewr— worried because they're worried enewr walking— worried because they're worried about walking at— worried because they're worried about walking at you know, during— about walking at you know, inning ine— about walking at you know, during the day— about walking at you know, during the day because these ineee— during the day because these ineee wewng— during the day because these these young men will be allowed to these young men will be allowed re cee— these young men will be allowed re in— these young men will be allowed to come in and— these young men will be allowed to come in and out— these young men will be allowed to come in and out right up enri— to come in and out right up wniii woo— to come in and out right up until 11:00 where they've got crew— until 11:00 where they've got crew ene — until 11:00 where they've got curfew and so— until 11:00 where they've got curfew and so naturally, reniiiee— curfew and so naturally, families are— curfew and so naturally, families are concerned about iner— families are concerned about we genge— families are concerned about we genge er— families are concerned about just gangs of men roaming around . anci— just gangs of men roaming around . ann nw— just gangs of men roaming around . and now other— just gangs of men roaming around . and now other councils- just gangs of men roaming around . and now other councils have launched legal challenges against the government. essex council, we know has started a legal challenge with the home office over plans to house asylum seekers at a former raf base. there are you guys going to start going down the legal route as well? i think they ereneniw— route as well? i think they ereneniw ee— route as well? i think they ereneniw .— route as well? i think they probably are . i'm- 7 i think they probably are . i'm not sort of, probably are. i'm not sort of, you— probably are. i'm not sort of, wew knew,— probably are. i'm not sort of, wew knew, ine— probably are. i'm not sort of, you know, the organiser of any iegei— you know, the organiser of any iegei ceneeign— you know, the organiser of any legal campaign. we're just part of legal campaign. we're just part ei ine— legal campaign. we're just part ei rne wire— legal campaign. we're just part of the nato north eye, you know, recei— of the nato north eye, you know, local residents— of the nato north eye, you know, local residents who— of the nato north eye, you know, local residents who live in nine— local residents who live in little common _ local residents who live in little common in north eye iieeii— little common in north eye iieeir ,— little common in north eye itself , normans bay. little common in north eye itself, normans bay. we're all concerned about— itself, normans bay. we're all concerned about it because it's going— concerned about it because it's geing ie— concerned about it because it's geing re ineeci—

concerned about it because it's going to impact us all, you see. ane— going to impact us all, you see. and ee— going to impact us all, you see. and ee i— going to impact us all, you see. and ee i knew,— going to impact us all, you see. and so i know, i— going to impact us all, you see. and so i know, i know what were— and so i know, i know what wee reiking— and so i know, i know what you're talking about. raf sceneien— you're talking about. raf scampton and- you're talking about. raf scampton and is it basildon ieeex— scampton and is it basildon ieeex iner— scampton and is it basildon essex that they're concerned enewe— essex that they're concerned eiewie wen — essex that they're concerned about? you know, they're going to about? you know, they're going ie-enerner— about? you know, they're going to - another these - about? you know, they're going to another these large to have another these large ceiee— to have another these large centres-not— to have another these large centres-not just- centres and not just that, eeeerenriw— centres and not just that, apparently there going to be apparently there are going to be 20 apparently there are going to be ece-ine— apparently there are going to be 20 -the country. - apparently there are going to be 20-the country. i- apparently there are going to be 20 the country. 20 around the country. i think, yes.— 20 around the country. i think, we were— 20 around the country. i think, yes, there could be a number, but so about the solution but so what about the solution then? where should asylum seekers be housed not here in seekers be housed if not here in norfolk, where? okay, well , you norfolk, where? okay, well, you know, i've got a rather humorous response to that. my response is all response to that. my response is eii ineee— response to that. my response is eii ineee wre— response to that. my response is all those mps who _ response to that. my response is all those mps who voted- my response is all those mps who voted for war, the all those mps who voted for war, we reg— all those mps who voted for war, we ireg we— all those mps who voted for war, the iraq war, afghanistan war, vou— the iraq war, afghanistan war, wew knew,— the iraq war, afghanistan war, you know, bombed syria and ween— you know, bombed syria and yemen, actually,— you know, bombed syria and yemen, actually, let's do that i— yemen, actually, let's do that i ininw— yemen, actually, let's do that one. i think that— yemen, actually, let's do that one. i think that they should newee— one. i think that they should newee e— one. i think that they should house a couple.— one. i think that they should house a couple. you know, iieeee— house a couple. you know, please, could— house a couple. you know, please, could you house a ceweie— please, could you house a coupler wen— please, could you house a couple, you know, and take them in wewreeiweee— couple, you know, and take them in yourselves? because most people— in yourselves? because most eeeeie iii— in yourselves? because most eeeeie eie nei— in yourselves? because most people did not want wars and we need— people did not want wars and we need ie— people did not want wars and we need re eien— people did not want wars and we need to stop war. _ people did not want wars and we need to stop war. and as you can rren — need to stop war. and as you can rren nw— need to stop war. and as you can rren mvr urn— need to stop war. and as you can see from my, um, my little sort of see from my, um, my little sort ei neeier— see from my, um, my little sort er eeeier nee,— see from my, um, my little sort of poster here, end— see from my, um, my little sort of poster here, end wars , we've of poster here, end wars, we've gei— of poster here, end wars, we've gei re — of poster here, end wars, we've ger re ecce— of poster here, end wars, we've ger re eree ine— of poster here, end wars, we've got to stop the boats. and inei-e— got to stop the boats. and that's another— got to stop the boats. and that's another thing you haven't eewee— that's another thing you haven't eewer-geing— that's another thing you haven't eewer-geing ie- that's another thing you haven't asked going to just say asked me. i'm going to just say why— asked me. i'm going to just say wnw ee— asked me. i'm going to just say wnw inew— asked me. i'm going to just say why are they not— asked me. i'm going to just say why are they not seeking refuge refere— why are they not seeking refuge ieiere-re— why are they not seeking refuge before -to the - why are they not seeking refugei before -to the -there before they get to the uk? there are before they get to the uk? there eieniw— before they get to the uk? there eienrw ei— before they get to the uk? there

are plenty of safe— before they get to the uk? there are plenty of safe havens around , vou— are plenty of safe havens around , wew knew,— are plenty of safe havens around ryou knew-ine- are plenty of safe havens around , you know, the world on , you know, around the world on cnein— , you know, around the world on ineir-iren — , you know, around the world on their from afghanis, iran their route from afghanis, iran to their route from afghanis, iran re nere. — their route from afghanis, iran re nere. -ie— their route from afghanis, iran to here. -is that- their route from afghanis, iran to here.-is that ?- their route from afghanis, iran to here. is that ? that's to here. so why is that? that's numeri— to here. so why is that? that's number one. sheila. unfortunately i haven't time unfortunately i haven't got time for other reasons, for all the other reasons, but thank very for joining thank you very much for joining us merriman has said he us now, mr merriman has said he wasn't to at the event wasn't able to be at the event tonight because he was required tonight because he was required to be in parliament. that certainly disappointed locals here. thank you very here. lawrence thank you very much. ray. yes, call everyone a reciei— much. ray. yes, call everyone a reciei wne— much. ray. yes, call everyone a racist who doesn't— “flit ray. yes, call everyone a racist who doesn't want mart ray. yes, call everyone a racist who doesn't want 1200 niiiierw— racist who doesn't want 1200 niiirerw ege— racist who doesn't want 1200 military age males in an army ierrecwe — military age males in an army barracks. right.— military age males in an army barracks. right. coming up after the barracks. right. coming up after we been— barracks. right. coming up after the break, we'll— barracks. right. coming up after the break, we'll be joined by ixiinciien— the break, we'll be joined by extinction rebellion spokesperson about their wecening— spokesperson about their- upcoming-demonstrations upcoming joyous demonstrations ieneen— upcoming joyous demonstrations across london this— upcoming joyous demonstrations across london this weekend .

won't talk about. if it's happening, it's happening here. wake up two mornings on gb news. the wake up two mornings on gb news. inc people's— wake up two mornings on gb news. the people's channel. _ wake up two mornings on gb news. the people's channel. britain's- the people's channel. britain's news . well come back now. a huge news. well come back now. a huge protest is set to take— news. well come back now. a huge protest is set to take place- a huge protest is set to take place in ine— protest is set to take place in we ceeiiei— protest is set to take place in the capital over— protest is set to take place in the capital over this weekend as ixiinciien— the capital over this weekend as extinction rebellion. our iewewriie— extinction rebellion. our favourite friends host a four

day— favourite friends host a four new ereieei— favourite friends host a four day protest. spectators set to weicn— day protest. spectators set to weicn ine— day protest. spectators set to watch the london marathon are being— watch the london marathon are being urged— watch the london marathon are being urged ie— watch the london marathon are being urged to watch it from neme— being urged to watch it from nene er— being urged to watch it from home or avoid— being urged to watch it from home or avoid busy areas such as reriieneni—weer- parliament square this year over concerns about how much eierwniien— concerns about how much disruption the— concerns about how much disruption the protests may . ii— disruption the protests may . ii ie— disruption the protests may cause . it is predicted around cause. it is predicted around some— cause. it is predicted around 30,000 supporters could be in weeinineier— 30,000 supporters could be in westminster on— 30,000 supporters could be in westminster on sunday the westminster on sunday for the finer— westminster on sunday for the final stretch— westminster on sunday for the final stretch-the— westminster on sunday for the final stretch the marathon final stretch of the marathon ixiinciien— final stretch of the marathon extinction -those i extinction rebellion. those jolly— extinction rebellion. those ieiiw eewe— extinction rebellion. those ieiiw eewie eew— extinction rebellion. those jolly souls say that the group nee— jolly souls say that the group nee ne— jolly souls say that the group has no intentions disrupting has no intentions of disrupting the has no intentions of disrupting inc—ineieee- the marathon and instead are pending— the marathon and instead are providing opportunity providing an opportunity to cenneci— providing an opportunity to connect-and- providing an opportunity to connect and support connect with and support those running—rer- running in the marathon for causes amplified the climate causes amplified by the climate cneie— causes amplified by the climate cneienew—- causes amplified by the climate cneienew— in- causes amplified by the climate crisis._now in the. crisis. joining me now in the eiweie— crisis. joining me now in the eiweie ie— crisis. joining me now in the studio is spokesperson for ixiincrien— studio is spokesperson for extinction rebellion, peter studio is spokesperson for extincti peterbellion, peter studio is spokesperson for extincti peter what n, peter studio is spokesperson for extincti peter what whyeter studio is spokesperson for extincti peter what why why are we knapp. peter what why why are we newing— knapp. peter what why why are we newing ine— knapp. peter what why why are we having the protest? iv/rzir3 m e having the protest? yeah, it's we nerene— having the protest? yeah, it's we haven't made enough progress, really. i mean, we know that the people in this building over here that we've been telling them again and again and again that no new fossil fuel extraction is acceptable . all extraction is acceptable. all the science says we need to stop fossil fuel extraction. but they just keep still. they still keep doing it . so just keep still. they still keep doing it. so we've just keep still. they still keep doing it . so we've got to be out doing it. so we've got to be out there again saying the same message in order to save

mankind. well, yeah. i mean, what about this? i mean, obviously we— what about this? i mean, obviously we do- ;7 i mean, obviously we do realise that the ee—ceiiee— obviously we do realise that the so—called climate— obviously we do realise that the so—called climate crisis is wiring— so—called climate crisis is killing-because. so—called climate crisis is killing-because poor killing people because this poor eew— killing people because this poor eewi—iiie- soul who couldn't face life enwere— soul who couldn't face life. anymore _thought soul who couldn't face life- anymore _thought there anymore because he thought there was anymore because he thought there wee-nene.— anymore because he thought there wee-nene. wnei— anymore because he thought there was.hope. what do— anymore because he thought there was hope. what do you think was no hope. what do you think of was no hope. what do you think ei inew— was no hope. what do you think of that? well,— was no hope. what do you think of that? well, i— was no hope. what do you think of that? well, i mean, is there hope?— of that? well, i mean, is there hope? enewe— of that? well, i mean, is there hope? should people be killing ineneeiwee— hope? should people be killing themselves because the planet is a mess? that's— themselves because the planet is a mess? that's a— themselves because the planet is a mess? that's a that's- themselves because the planet is a mess? that's a that's a really tragic case. and i mean , i've tragic case. and i mean, i've been close to that myself . i been close to that myself. i think that the feelings of doomism are around the climate crisis is a real problem, especially among people who feel alone and this is the one thing that i think the protest is trying to address is to bring people together. this is about being accessible and inclusive to as many as we can to as many people as we can to avoid this. but are you inciweing— r: but are you including londoners? i mean, reek,— including londoners? i mean, ieewlwnew— including londoners? i mean, look,iknow tubes- including londoners? i mean, look, know tubes this look, i know tubes read this enn— look, i know tubes read this een—aci- look, i know tubes read this out._act 2000| look, i know tubes read this. out._act 2000 as out. so terrorism act 2000 as ine— out. so terrorism act 2000 as inc-cnren— out. so terrorism act 2000 as the-threat of- out. so terrorism act 2000 as the-threat of one- out. so terrorism act 2000 as the threat of one or more the use of threat of one or more of the use of threat of one or more ei ine— the use of threat of one or more of the actions— the use of threat of one or more of the actions listed below and wnerner— of the actions listed below and whether-designed- whether they're designed to influence— influence government or an international— international governmental ergenieeiien— international governmental. organisation _the organisation or intimidate the generic,— organisation or intimidate the generic-ei— organisation or intimidate the public,-of threat- organisation or intimidate the public, of threat must public, the use of threat must eiee— public, the use of threat must eiee ie— public, the use of threat must eiee ire rer— public, the use of threat must also be for the— public, the use of threat must also be for the purpose of eewencing— also be for the purpose of advancing political, religious or-ideological- advancing political, religious or ideological cause. or racial or ideological cause. seriewe— or racial or ideological cause. serious violence— or racial or ideological cause. serious violence against persons , serious violence against persons

r_iiroperivrl , serious damage to property, eneengering— , serious damage to property, endangering person's life. endangering a person's life. iner— endangering a person's life. that happened— endangering a person's life. that happened , i think, the that happened, i think, at the cneni— that happened, i think, at the grand national.— that happened, i think, at the grand national. would suggest grand national. i would suggest ceneiniw—e- grand national. i would suggest certainly—a horse's. certainly endangered a horse's life certainly endangered a horse's iire ene— certainly endangered a horse's iire ene ine— certainly endangered a horse's life and the rider— certainly endangered a horse's life and the rider as well, creeiing— life and the rider as well, creeiing e— life and the rider as well, creating a serious risk to neeiin— creating a serious risk to neeiin er— creating a serious risk to health or safety the public health or safety of the public or health or safety of the public er-ei— health or safety of the public er-ei ine- health or safety of the public or-of the public- health or safety of the public or of the public and or a section of the public and ecrien— or a section of the public and action—seriously. action designed to seriously inreriere— action designed to seriously interfere disrupt an interfere with or disrupt an eiecirenic— interfere with or disrupt an electronic would you interfere with or disrupt an- electronic -would you say electronic system. would you say iner— electronic system. would you say iner-ecie— electronic system. would you say inei-ecie ei— electronic system. would you say that acts of extinction that the acts of extinction iceieeiiien— that the acts of extinction rebellion and _ that the acts of extinction rebellion and just oil rebellion and just stop oil are ecce— rebellion and just stop oil are ecie—we— rebellion and just stop oil are ecie—we i- rebellion and just stop oil are acts—no i don't. acts of terrorism? no i don't. i acts of terrorism? no i don't. i een-c— acts of terrorism? no i don't. i don't recognise— acts of terrorism? no i don't. i don't recognise much- acts of terrorism? no i don't. i don't recognise much of- acts of terrorism? no i don't. i don't recognise much of the language there in the sense of what what we have planned . what what we have planned. instead, much more we've instead, it's a much more we've listened the public really. listened to the public really. we, we are not going to disrupt anything. we haven't voted for you. that's true. yeah. so you may have listened— you. that's true. yeah. so you may have listened to- iv/rzir3 m so you may have listened to the public, but may have listened to the public, in ine— may have listened to the public, in we ewiiic— may have listened to the public, but the public aren't going. vee— but the public aren't going. wee inew— but the public aren't going. you know what— but the public aren't going. you know what on- but the public aren't going. you know what on a- but the public aren't going. you know what on a vote in peter yeah, true. but we do. yeah, that's true. but we do. are you holding us hostage like a we do. listen a terrorist? no, we do. listen to a terrorist? no, we do. listen re wnei— a terrorist? no, we do. listen ie we ine— a terrorist? no, we do. listen to what the public- ;7 no, we do. listen to what the public say in inierwiewe— to what the public say in interviews and- to what the public say in interviews and social media interviews and in social media ene— interviews and in social media enelcennenierw.- interviews and in social media and commentary. and we do and in commentary. and we do mine— and in commentary. and we do wink-e— and in commentary. and we do think-a-important. think it's a really important eiee—e- think it's a really important step a disruption step to instead a disruption iner— step to instead a disruption inei nee— step to instead a disruption that has been— step to instead a disruption that has been done, especially on that has been done, especially en cenning— that has been done, especially on canning town,— that has been done, especially on canning town, where someone giwee— on canning town, where someone glued themselves— on canning town, where someone glued themselves the top of a glued themselves to the top of a irein. —inei- glued themselves to the top of a train. _that wasi train. if you remember that was he train. if you remember that was ne-irneiree— train. if you remember that was he-ethelred the- train. if you remember that was he ethelred the unready, train. if you remember that was hewas ethelred the unready, train. if you remember that was hewas thatthelred the unready, train. if you remember that was

hewas that torquilthe unready, train. if you remember that was hewas that torquil ?e unready, train. if you remember that was hewas that torquil ? no,|ready, train. if you remember that was hewas that torquil ? no, iaady, train. if you remember that was hewas that torquil ? no, i don't or was that torquil? no, i don't remember his— or was that torquil? no, i don't remember his name, but he yeah, iner— remember his name, but he yeah, we wee— remember his name, but he yeah, we en— remember his name, but he yeah, that was an action— remember his name, but he yeah, that was an action which was regreiieiie. — that was an action which was regrettable. it— that was an action which was regrettable. it didn't paint us in e— regrettable. it didn't paint us in e geee— regrettable. it didn't paint us in e geee igni— regrettable. it didn't paint us in a good light at all. can we nei— in a good light at all. can we nei iner— in a good light at all. can we not just agree? _ in a good light at all. can we not just agree? see, this is what i'm interested in the climate thing. do we go both sides of the argument? we want a cleaner world. it is already a cleaner world. it is already a cleaner world. it is already a cleaner world. by the way, you know the catalytic converter did cleaner world. by the way, you kilot the catalytic converter did cleaner world. by the way, you kilot of e catalytic converter did cleaner world. by the way, you kilot of that. tlytic converter did cleaner world. by the way, you kilot of that. but: converter did cleaner world. by the way, you kilot of that. but we nverter did cleaner world. by the way, you kilot of that. but we all rter did cleaner world. by the way, you kilot of that. but we all want id cleaner world. by the way, you kilot of that. but we all want a a lot of that. but we all want a cleaner world. so if we start from the premise that we all want a cleaner world, we can then a conversation. to me, then have a conversation. to me, this direct action thing this sort of direct action thing and coming from someone and this is coming from someone who involved direct who got involved in direct action, over the covid action, certainly over the covid stuff. know, think stuff. so, you know, i think there is a time a place for there is a time and a place for it, but can not begin the it, but but can we not begin the conversation by turning around and saying to each other, right, we a cleaner, better we both want a cleaner, better planet? absolutely. where do we start because seems start from? because it seems like from like you're starting from a series demands we can have no series of demands we can have no fossil fuels, whereas i would come a position saying, come from a position of saying, well, reduces well, actually gdp reduces pollution what you pollution itself. what do you say that? well, i wouldn't say to that? well, i wouldn't use-a measure.- say to that? well, i wouldn't use-a measure. i- say to that? well, i wouldn'ti use-a measure. i think use gdp as a measure. i think cnere— use gdp as a measure. i think were reeiiw— use gdp as a measure. i think that's really kind— use gdp as a measure. i think that's really kind of outdated eweien. — that's really kind of outdated

eweren. ner— that's really kind of outdated eweren. new i— that's really kind of outdated system. but i would say that the way— system. but i would say that the wew re— system. but i would say that the wew re engege— system. but i would say that the way to engage public is to way to engage the public is to is way to engage the public is to ie ie— way to engage the public is to ie re wing— way to engage the public is to is to bring them— way to engage the public is to is to bring them in in terms of wnei— is to bring them in in terms of what-citizens- what we call citizens assemblies.- what we call citizens assemblies. of that is assemblies. the idea of that is iner— assemblies. the idea of that is we we— assemblies. the idea of that is that we select— assemblies. the idea of that is that we select a _ assemblies. the idea of that is that we select a group of pewter— that we select a group ofi weenie—weird that we select a group of- people,_would be for people, like people would be for a people, like people would be for e-inew— people, like people would be for e-inew ee— people, like people would be for a-they are brought- people, like people would be for a they are brought in a jury and they are brought in to a jury and they are brought in ie—en— a jury and they are brought in re—en en- a jury and they are brought in to-on on changes. a jury and they are brought in. to-on on changes that to deliberate on on changes that nece— to deliberate on on changes that need re— to deliberate on on changes that need re ie— to deliberate on on changes that need to be made.— to deliberate on on changes that need to be made. it's need to be made. so it's not eeiiiiciene— need to be made. so it's not politicians-this- need to be made. so it's not. politicians-thislwhat politicians dictate this is what geing— politicians dictate this is what geing re— politicians dictate this is what we're going to do. and then all the we're going to do. and then all we generic— we're going to do. and then all rne ewniic ee— we're going to do. and then all the public are going to go, reigne— the public are going to go, right,_that's. the public are going to go,- right,_that's what's right, okay, well, that's what's neeeening. —ier- happening. like it was for ieewing— happening. like it was for ieewing eii— happening. like it was for issuing all the- happening. like it was for issuing all the oil and gas issuing all the new oil and gas iicencee— issuing all the new oil and gas licences-what— issuing all the new oil and gas licences what should be licences is what it should be nene— licences is what it should be done instead— licences is what it should be done instead i a _ licences is what it should be done instead a deliberation done instead is a deliberation wirn— done instead is a deliberation win-neiene— done instead is a deliberation with-public. the- done instead is a deliberation with public. the public with the public. the public neede— with the public. the public needs-brought- with the public. the public needs brought more on needs to be brought more on ieere— needs to be brought more on ieere-ane- needs to be brought more on board _and this- board with this. and this is wnei—ewiiici board with this. and this is. what_ public are what you think the public are going— what you think the public are geing-neren— what you think the public are going-bored and- what you think the public are going bored and bored with going to be bored and bored with it going to be bored and bored with i iecee— going to be bored and bored with i iecee wew— going to be bored and bored with it because you know, i mean, cneiee— it because you know, i mean, ethelred, the _ it because you know, i mean, ethelred, the unready jumping on top ethelred, the unready jumping on reg-ine— ethelred, the unready jumping on top-the snooker— ethelred, the unready jumping on top the snooker table with top of the snooker table with his top of the snooker table with nie-erenge- top of the snooker table with his orange powder is top of the snooker table with his everyone orange powder is top of the snooker table with his everyone justige powder is top of the snooker table with his everyone just thinksivder is top of the snooker table with his everyone just thinks its is all everyone just thinks it's nercieeiei. — all everyone just thinks it's narcissist. _what. all everyone just thinks it's narcissist-what ii narcissist. that's what i thought. i saw it, thought. the minute i saw it, i thought, this your moment in thought, this is your moment in the mate. you're a the sun, mate. you're a narcissist. i don't think that's engaging with the public. i don't think that's what you're describing as citizens assembly, which very good which sounds like a very good idea sounds like idea to me. that sounds like you're just ruining snooker, which let's face the which is, let's face it, the least, warming sport least, that global warming sport ever. yeah, sure. isn't it?

ween.— ever. yeah, sure. isn't it? ween. i— ever. yeah, sure. isn't it? ween. i neen— ever. yeah, sure. isn't it? yeah. i mean, the group, the group here is just stop oil and even supporting even though they're supporting in extent action in to some extent the action over weekend over the weekend is predominantly not going be predominantly not going to be a disruptive weekend. so we're going to be to cross the going to be able to cross the bridges. and if someone's an bridges. and if someone's in an ambulance, they'll be able to get absolutely. yeah get off. absolutely. yeah okay. so fun games and so it's just fun and games and dancing with banners dancing around with banners and it's with public. it's engagement with the public. i engagement is good. i mean, engagement is good. ire— i mean, engagement is good. we eiwewe— i mean, engagement is good. we eiwewe re— i mean, engagement is good. i've always to be— i mean, engagement is good. i've always to be fair- i mean, engagement is good. i've always to be fair to- i mean, engagement is good. i've always to be fair to you guys, when i've ever gone down to which i have to your protest, which i have done people there's done frequently, people there's always there who's like, always someone there who's like, can about do you can we talk about it? do you want to talk about it? and you can reasonable can have a reasonable discussion. you discussion. unfortunately, you are people who discussion. unfortunately, you are glued people who discussion. unfortunately, you are glued to people who discussion. unfortunately, you are glued to a people who discussion. unfortunately, you are glued to a road people who discussion. unfortunately, you are glued to a road which; who discussion. unfortunately, you are glued to a road which is/ho are glued to a road which is a bit annoying. let's be very annoying. yeah. and illegal. ween— annoying. yeah. and illegal. ween wew-we— annoying. yeah. and illegal. yeah you've got— annoying. yeah. and illegal. yeah you've got-bring- mg / and illegal. yeah you've got bring you yeah you've got to bring you bring— yeah you've got to bring you iringleneii— yeah you've got to bring you bring small chair to yeah you've got to bring you bring small chairto have bring a small chair to have a cnei— bring a small chair to have a cnei wiin— bring a small chair to have a chat with them.— bring a small chair to have a chat with them. but the police enewe — chat with them. but the police enewe -eir— chat with them. but the policej should - off - street. chat with them. but the police i should - off - street. should rip them off the street. snewiin-r— should rip them off the street. shouldn't-it's— should rip them off the street. shouldn't- it's obstructingl shouldn't they. it's obstructing the highway. well it the queen's highway. well no it isn't the queen's highway. well no it ien-i wirnin— the queen's highway. well no it isn't within the _ the queen's highway. well no it isn't within the legal— quiiii m m 3 well no it isn't within the legal right i ininw— isn't within the legal right i ininw re,— isn't within the legal right i ininw re, re— isn't within the legal right i think to, to protest in that way to think to, to protest in that way re-eir— think to, to protest in that way re-eii ine— think to, to protest in that way to-off the street- think to, to protest in that way to off the street would to rip them off the street would be to rip them off the street would ire—re— to rip them off the street would ire—re newe- to rip them off the street would ire—re newe e- be illegal. but to have a reasoned conversation with people— reasoned conversation with weenie—cnie people is exactly what this is all people is exactly what this is eii enewr.— people is exactly what this is all about. and— people is exactly what this is all about. and it's not about

eeeeking— all about. and it's not about eeeewing ie— all about. and it's not about speaking to people who are glued to speaking to people who are glued ie—neeeie- to roads. it's about people eeeeking— to roads. it's about people speaking-whol to roads. it's about people. speaking-who are to roads. it's about people- speaking-who are just speaking to people who are just going— speaking to people who are just geing-weiiing— going to be waiting for conversations with the public. where— conversations with the public. wnec-e weer— conversations with the public. what's your favourite- conversations with the public. what's your favourite sports car? oh, to have car? oh, i. i used to have a mini— car? oh, i. i used to have a mini en— car? oh, i. i used to have a mini en eie— car? oh, i. i used to have a mini an old style- £3”7 oh, i. i used to have a mini an old style mini mini cooper-— mini an old style mini mini ceeeer. ner— mini an old style mini mini ceeeer. new i— mini an old style mini mini cooper. but i don't drive enwere— cooper. but i don't drive anymore . e: cooper. but i don't drive anymore. e: cooper. but i don't drive anymore. e cooper. but i don't drive- anymore . good for you. well, anymore. good for you. well, you're doing your bit for the planet. peter, thank you so much for me. that was good forjoining me. that was good fun to. coming up next, they've cancelled roald dahl. shakespeare mob shakespeare and now the woke mob are the great p.g. are editing out the great p.g. wodehouse. we'll discuss in a fiery debate, no doubt, next. by

rehearsals are taking place, the coronation quiche has been revealed and union flags and bunting now fill all the supermarkets . but at a time when supermarkets. but at a time when the whole country can unite and celebrate our traditions and institutions , there is yet more institutions, there is yet more protests being planned and this

time protesting oil or horse time not protesting oil or horse racing. this lot are protesting the monarchy itself . republic an the monarchy itself. republic an anti—monarchist group, are planning to protest at the coronation shouting not my king. i hate to break it to you chaps and chaps, but he is the leader of the group says that more than 1350 very specific number of people have pledged to protest at coronation may the at the coronation on may the 6th. here to discuss with 6th. here to discuss this with me commentator richard me is royal commentator richard fitzwilliams. on fitzwilliams. richard what on earth going on and what do earth is going on and what do they got planned? well, what they've - planned - grit; :7 well, what they've planned apparently grit; :7 well, what they've firstly,anned apparently grit; :7 well, what they've firstly, anned a going itly grit; :7 well, what thrwearzirstly, anned a going itly grit; :7 well, what thrwear yellow, ined a going itly grit; :7 well, what thrwear yellow, so. a goingitly grit; :7 well, what thiwear yellow, so. om ingitly grit; :7 well, what thiwear yellow, so. om 1 to wear yellow, so. oh, well, wew— to wear yellow, so. oh, well, very good. what does that mean? well, slava ukraini. well, it means slava ukraini. they be picked up by the they want to be picked up by the media. they've got publicity in nine. — media. they've got publicity in nine. inec-e— media. they've got publicity in mind. that's all— media. they've got publicity in mind. that's all about- mrir: they've got publicity in mind. 3£ mind. that's all about the fact that republic actually for a long time have known that the only chance that they've got to make any real impression was when the queen died. and with king cnenice— when the queen died. and with king charles, obviously- m quiiii m r: rir: and with king charles, obviously in his 70 eecenee — king charles, obviously in his 70 seconds. quiiii m king charles, obviously in his 70 seconds. qirziri m cr3m 70 seconds. queen camilla likewise, is the, you know, the

last 50 years with ups and downs for both of them. and the facts are that that's, i think, behind it. they're hoping to get eweeen— it. they're hoping to get eweeen ene— e they're hoping to get support and they're also hoping to support and they're also hoping re-inie— support and they're also hoping to-into national— support and they're also hoping to into national coverage. to get into national coverage. ner— to get into national coverage. in ine— to get into national coverage. but the whole— to get into national coverage. but the whole thing is basically a but the whole thing is basically e iii— but the whole thing is basically e iii er— but the whole thing is basically e iii ei e— but the whole thing is basically e iii er e enw— but the whole thing is basically enireieeirw. — but the whole thing is basically a bit of a pity. i— but the whole thing is basically a bit of a pity. but the whole thing is basically a bit of a pity . a bit of a pity. i simply say this because it's a bit tasteless for them to protest. i feel , when it tasteless for them to protest. i feel, when it comes to know albie ceremony , you'd have felt albie ceremony, you'd have felt it would have been more dignified to stay away. they couldn't stay away from the maundy ceremony. york minster. but isn't i mean, isn't the monarchy to blame for some of this? because if prince charles is this? because if prince charles ie irwing— this? because if prince charles ie rrwing ie— this? because if prince charles is trying to outwork_ ;7 because if prince charles is trying to outwork himself, wing— is trying to outwork himself, king charles,— is trying to outwork himself, king charles, sorry , is trying king charles, sorry, is trying to king charles, sorry, is trying re ie— king charles, sorry, is trying to be diverse— king charles, sorry, is trying to be diverse ,_ king charles, sorry, is trying to be diverse , equitable and to be diverse, equitable and inciweiwe— to be diverse, equitable and inciweiwe ,— to be diverse, equitable and inclusive , coming from the inclusive, coming from the werie-e— inclusive, coming from the world's most— inclusive, coming from the world's most privileged , white, world's most privileged, white, eriwiiegee— world's most privileged, white, privileged family— world's most privileged, white, privileged family on earth . why privileged family on earth. why is privileged family on earth. why ie in— privileged family on earth. why ie in ne— privileged family on earth. why is if he panders_ privileged family on earth. why is if he panders to this woke mobr_ is if he panders to this woke mob, wouldn't— is if he panders to this woke mob, wouldn't he expect to be giggled— mob, wouldn't he expect to be giggiee ei— mob, wouldn't he expect to be giggiee er cnen— mob, wouldn't he expect to be giggled at them as they try and greg— giggled at them as they try and ring nin — giggled at them as they try and ring nin ie— giggled at them as they try and drag him to the— giggled at them as they try and drag him to the gallows? no, no, weir.— drag him to the gallows? no, no, wen i.— drag him to the gallows? no, no, no. well, i. regarding- drag him to the gallows? no, no, no. 3:: mr: no. well, i. regarding the gallows, it's a very, very long time that had the time ago that they had the picture of the guillotine on

their website. in fact , what their website. in fact, what king charles would argue , i king charles would argue, i think, is yes, he is, of course, represent the national unity assembly, represents a more diverse britain, even though the 70 years since the last coronation but what have they got to protest about? the answer is that got to protest about? the answer ie we ine— got to protest about? the answer is that the polls— got to protest about? the answer is that the polls show— grit; 7 the answer is that the polls show that wewnger— is that the polls show that younger people are turning off the younger people are turning off we nenercnw.— younger people are turning off the monarchy. _ younger people are turning off the monarchy. but the interesting aspect of that, if you look at the 18 to 24 year old group in the ipsos mori and the yougov polls, what you see is they may be disillusioned with the monarchy. what isn't asked is what_ f what isn't asked is what alternative they'd like asked is what alternative they'd iiwe ene— asked is what alternative they'd we end ire— asked is what alternative they'd like and it's that— asked is what alternative they'd like and it's that that i think ine— like and it's that that i think we ewiiic— like and it's that that i think the public have— like and it's that that i think the public have as a problem. vee— the public have as a problem. you remember— the public have as a problem. you remember the— the public have as a problem. you remember the 1999- the public have as a problem. you remember the 1999 referendum in australia, the that was the sort of thing where you didn't have younger people being naturally sceptic of institutions. as you say , the institutions. as you say, the monarchy has traditional aspects . it wouldn't appeal to everybody. but what you have got is problem that republic are is a problem that republic are no , that you have some no, that you have some superannuated party hack. heaven knows you could choose take your

pick. i mean , the guardian made pick. i mean, the guardian made an idiot of itself about 20 years when they were trying years ago when they were trying to pretend that when the to pretend firstly that when the queen died, there queen mother died, there wouldn't that much interest wouldn't be that much interest apart and apart from the old. and secondly, course, the golden secondly, of course, the golden jubilee would there be much interest. they were trying desperately play down. and desperately to play it down. and who two most likely as who were the two most likely as head betty boothroyd , head of state? betty boothroyd, a staunch monarchist and princess anne. so it's very difficult for a republic. and this is the big chance they think. and wearing yellow with yellow placards with hashtag not my king and they think it will appeal to a lot of international broadcasters and also get some local support. well i'm sure they will get the international broadcasters seeing as most of the hates the the broadcast media hates the king and don't think king as well and don't think he's either. but what he's our king either. but what i would he's our king either. but what i wewie ewggeer— he's our king either. but what i would suggest is,— ” mg but what i would suggest is, wouldn't it be wewien-i— would suggest is, wouldn't it be wewien-r ine— would suggest is, wouldn't it be wouldn't the monarchy be better ewiiee— wouldn't the monarchy be better ewiiee ie— wouldn't the monarchy be better suited to come— wouldn't the monarchy be better suited to come out— wouldn't the monarchy be better suited to come out front footed ene— suited to come out front footed ene eew— suited to come out front footed ene eew-ine— suited to come out front footed and say, the greatest and say, we're the greatest institution _ and say, we're the greatest institution in— and say, we're the greatest institution in the world, we're institution in the world, we're in-ineeneni— institution in the world, we're in-important for- institution in the world, we're in important for this in most important for this cewnirw— in most important for this country, ditch— in most important for this country, ditch all the iiwereiiw— country, ditch all the diversity, and country, ditch all the- diversity,-and inclusion diversity, equity and inclusion rwiiien— rubbish, because you're never geing— rubbish, because you're never going—peoplel rubbish, because you're never. going—people at going to satisfy those people at all going to satisfy those people at err-iner— going to satisfy those people at eii-iwei cee— going to satisfy those people at all-just come out- going to satisfy those people at all just come out and be all and just come out and be eerriericeiiw— all and just come out and be

patriotically footed for patriotically front footed for nriiein. — patriotically front footed for britain. doesn't- patriotically front footed for britain. i e britain. doesn't matter. the monarchy has to represent all britain by its very nature. it must. and also, i mean , when it must. and also, i mean, when it comes to party politics, it's got to be above them as a result , they couldn't make a statement like that without stirring up an absolute hornet's nest. even if they wanted to. they had a eieieneni.— they wanted to. they had a statement. it's— they wanted to. they had a statement. it's an- : they had a statement. it's an action. it's a statement. it's an action. it's eieing— statement. it's an action. it's e geing. ine— statement. it's an action. it's a doing. the queen did, didn't ence— a doing. the queen did, didn't enee sne— a doing. the queen did, didn't she? she she— a doing. the queen did, didn't she? she she was— a doing. the queen did, didn't she? she she was a doer. she weer— she? she she was a doer. she kenileiiii— she? she she was a doer. she keptistill-know- she? she she was a doer. she kept still know whether kept i still don't know whether the kept i still don't know whether inc-weren— kept i still don't know whether the _voted brexit. - kept i still don't know whether the voted brexit. like the queen voted brexit. i like to the queen voted brexit. i like re—eie- the queen voted brexit. i like ie—eie. weii to imagine that she did. well iner— to imagine that she did. well iner-e— to imagine that she did. well that-a terrific— to imagine that she did. well that a terrific quick that was a terrific quick gweeiien— that was a terrific quick question mark. that was a terrific quick- question mark. as to what the royal family actually think. what did the queen really think? charles is a remainer. i but you een-c— charles is a remainer. i but you een-r knew— charles is a remainer. i but you don't know that for certain. and put money on it. no, but the queen, this was very interesting that asked a question that the queen asked a question about was taken by about brexit. this was taken by both sides to mean something . both sides to mean something. and the point is that you didn't know queen thought. know what the queen thought. rather like the portraits of over 250 or some such. you never knew what she thought you could imagine thought. but imagine what she thought. but it's obviously growing up as she did in totally different era. did in a totally different era.

so could hide your real so you could hide your real views. we know what the king thinks. as prince of wales , but thinks. as prince of wales, but he to create his own job. he had to create his own job. otherwise he'd just be a ribbon cutting exercise, prince's trust, people. cutting exercise, prince's timean people. cutting exercise, prince's timean , people. cutting exercise, prince's timean , i people. cutting exercise, prince's timean , i love people. cutting exercise, prince's timean , i love prince's ple. i mean, i love the prince's trust and there's lots of things that he's done, which i think are fab. and i love his love of architecture. _ are fab. and i love his love of architecture. and— are fab. and i love his love of architecture. and i— 3”r:i and i love his love of architecture. and i think cnere-e— architecture. and i think there's lots— architecture. and i think there's lots of- architecture. and i think there's lots of things that he eeee— there's lots of things that he eecee-e— there's lots of things that he does are fabulous. does which are fabulous. but i inink— does which are fabulous. but i inink ne— does which are fabulous. but i inink ne nee— does which are fabulous. but i think he has he— does which are fabulous. but i think he has he i— does which are fabulous. but i think he has he i think he has cnie— think he has he i think he has this achilles— think he has he i think he has this achilles heel— think he has he i think he has this achilles heel where he ininke— this achilles heel where he ininke-ne— this achilles heel where he thinks-he can- this achilles heel where he thinks he can pander to the thinks that he can pander to the mob— thinks that he can pander to the cneie ine— thinks that he can pander to the mob, the republic— thinks that he can pander to the mob, the republic and he thinks iner— mob, the republic and he thinks ineiliw— mob, the republic and he thinks rnerliw rrwing— mob, the republic and he thinks that by trying play to that by by trying to play to inen — that by by trying to play to inen -nie— that by by trying to play to them his diversity, equity them with his diversity, equity ene— them with his diversity, equity ene-egenee,- them with his diversity, equity and agenda, he'll and inclusion agenda, he'll ecrweiiw— and inclusion agenda, he'll actually up actually end up being tripped up by actually end up being tripped up by-y°“_ actually end up being tripped up iw-wew inink- actually end up being tripped up by-you think that- actually end up being tripped up by you think that king by them. do you think that king cneriee—ieei- by them. do you think that king charles—last king- by them. do you think that king charles last king of charles will be the last king of ingienee — charles will be the last king of england? definitely- charles will be the last king of england? jri m erilyr england? definitely not. but firstly, we've had the monarchy as you know, back to oh, as well. you know, back to oh, one years the coronation one 700 years of the coronation of edgar, 973, except they of king edgar, 973, except they didn't twitter the didn't have twitter at the battle of hastings, though, did they? oh, know. they? oh, i don't know. renewe— they? oh, i don't know. perhaps. wasn't the lord perhaps. wasn't it the lord protector, cromwell , who protector, oliver cromwell, who invented joked invented twitter? i joked because, that's the because, of course, that's the one in our history when one period in our history when we a republic. what did they we had a republic. what did they do they they melted down all do it? they they melted down all

the regalia . in fact, there's the regalia. in fact, there's only a spoon. a couple of swords that predate that . and i mean, that predate that. and i mean, there's no question republic i don't think are going to get very far. and they have these little poles. you were asking whether there would the whether there would be the monarchy or after monarchy after charles or after william successors william or william's successors . william and his . i think that william and his family will handle superbly, family will handle it superbly, but it does mean adaptability . but it does mean adaptability. and if you don't represent the whole country and also you don't very carefully move above the party political arena, you really are laying yourself open to attacks that will not be pleasant and the reparations issue, for example , that's one issue, for example, that's one which is being very carefully handled because the three year research into this is precisely what the british monarchy links with slavery were . the facts are with slavery were. the facts are it's you would argue that the british monarchy we've got to ditch the idea of reparations . ditch the idea of reparations. otherwise, i want some reeereriene— otherwise, i want some reparations from the romans. neg,— reparations from the romans. weii, wew— reparations from the romans. well, you could— reparations from the romans. well, you could ask, of course, ini— well, you could ask, of course, in enewe— well, you could ask, of course, but should we— well, you could ask, of course, but should we ditch? e but should we ditch? it's an excre— but should we ditch? it's an extra ordinarily difficult topic, but for a member, there

are 15 nations in the commonwealth where his king, some of them are in the canbbean some of them are in the caribbean and barbados became a republic , to be sure. but they republic, to be sure. but they didn't ask the people progress, though. progress all in the name of though. progress all in the name er eregreee. — though. progress all in the name er eregreee. ner— though. progress all in the name of progress. but thank- g progress all in the name of progress. m33“ g progress all in the name of progress. but thank you so much for joining of progress. but thank you so much forjoining me. amen. and god save the king right? it has been revealed that a newly re—issued jeeves and wooster books carry trigger books will now carry trigger warnings. the madness warnings. oh, stop the madness and books to remove language that could offensive. that could be offensive. alexander armstrong, the honorary president uk pg honorary president of uk uk's pg wodehouse society, supported wodehouse society, has supported these changes, arguing the these changes, arguing that the novelists would never wish to upset his readers. really, george once wrote, every george orwell once wrote, every record has been destroyed or falsified every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and building has been renamed. every date has been altered. and that process is continuing day by day by day and minute by minute. history has stopped . and sadly, it would stopped. and sadly, it would appear that his dystopian ideas are very much alive and kicking in our world today. like something from fahrenheit 451, the mob are continuing to

the woke mob are continuing to destroy our history and traditions burning down in traditions, burning them down in front very eyes, all front of our very eyes, all because someone might a because someone might be a little joining me to little hurt. joining me to discuss history and discuss whether our history and culture is worth saving and fighting is commentator and fighting for is commentator and reality star kaur. reality tv star narinder kaur. and conservative north and conservative mp for north east news legend east somerset and gb news legend jacob therese of the mogg. good evening. evening, narinder evening. good evening, narinder kaur. evening. good evening, narinder kaur . yes. what do you reckon ? kaur. yes. what do you reckon? i think it's just correct to rece— i think it's just correct to ieke eni— i think it's just correct to take out liberal uses of the were— take out liberal uses of the were n— take out liberal uses of the were n eni— take out liberal uses of the word n out of— take out liberal uses of the word n out of books because it's iner— word n out of books because it's iwei nei— word n out of books because it's just not appropriate . just not appropriate. what enewe— just not appropriate. what enewe we— just not appropriate. what should we take— just not appropriate. what should we take the n word out of the mark twain take out of everywhere? because should eweenerw— everywhere? because should eweenerw ie— everywhere? because should everyone be banned- ”yr ”r:i7’ because should everyone be banned from using the everyone be banned from using rne w— everyone be banned from using rne w werew— everyone be banned from using rne n were — everyone be banned from using the n word? we— everyone be banned from using the n word? �*vwi�*rzi 3”r:i it's the n word? we are. it's iiiegei— the n word? we are. it's iiiegei. ire— the n word? �*vwi�*rzi 3”r:i it's illegal. it's actually illegal. ire— illegal. it's actually illegal. ir-e eciweiiw— illegal. it's actually illegal. it's actually illegal. iv/rzi; it's actually illegal. yes. but rnew— it's actually illegal. yes. but they warning. so. they come with a warning. so. because you can't upset because then you can't upset people i think it's more people because i think it's more of when you find that of a problem when you find that you're upset that the n word should be kept in. i'd say that it's should be kept in. i'd say that we cnere— should be kept in. i'd say that it's more offensive— should be kept in. i'd say that it's more offensive to- : m i'd say that it's more offensive to keep it in cnen— it's more offensive to keep it in inen re— it's more offensive to keep it in than to offend— it's more offensive to keep it in than to offend an entire recen— in than to offend an entire race. jacob and- in than to offend an entire race. jacob and i- in than to offend an entire race. e in than to offend an entire- race. jacob and i don't disagree with that at all. actually, it is with that at all. actually, it ie we — with that at all. actually, it ie we ire— with that at all. actually, it is the it's such— with that at all. actually, it

is the it's such an- actually, it is the it's such an offensive were— is the it's such an offensive were ene— is the it's such an offensive were end i— is the it's such an offensive word and i agree- is the it's such an offensive word and i agree with alexander arneireng— word and i agree with alexander armstrong that— word and i agree with alexander armstrong that p.g. wodehouse nineeir— armstrong that p.g. wodehouse himself would— armstrong that p.g. wodehouse himself would not want to enewr.— himself would not want to enene. in— himself would not want to offend. i'm less- himself would not want to offend. i'm less convinced that ieking— offend. i'm less convinced that ieking enr— offend. i'm less convinced that ieking ewi e— offend. i'm less convinced that taking out a travelling minstrel nene— taking out a travelling minstrel nene ie— taking out a travelling minstrel nene ie e— taking out a travelling minstrel band is a clever— taking out a travelling minstrel band is a clever thing to do eecee— band is a clever thing to do because that's— band is a clever thing to do because that's something that neeeenee— because that's something that neeeenee in— because that's something that happened in that time . um, and happened in that time. um, and it's happened in that time. um, and ice werw— happened in that time. um, and ice werw iwnnw— happened in that time. um, and ice werw rwnnw .— happened in that time. um, and it's very funny . arnie but i do it's very funny. arnie but i do inink— it's very funny. arnie but i do inink iner— it's very funny. arnie but i do inink inei e— it's very funny. arnie but i do think that a word,— it's very funny. arnie but i do think that a word, if there is a were— think that a word, if there is a were iner— think that a word, if there is a were we ie— think that a word, if there is a word that is particularly wnigweiw— word that is particularly uniquely offensive , then it's uniquely offensive, then it's iei— uniquely offensive, then it's reir enewgn— uniquely offensive, then it's fair enough to— uniquely offensive, then it's fair enough to take that word ewi. — fair enough to take that word ewi. anci— fair enough to take that word out. and, but— fair enough to take that word out. and, but my- fair enough to take that word out. mr: : out. and, but my question was, should that apply across to all aspects of society ? well, i aspects of society? well, i think aspects of society? well, i inink iner— aspects of society? well, i think that people - f f clog? well, i think that people should use iengwege— think that people should use language carefully. i think iengwege— language carefully. i think iengwege ie— language carefully. i think language is very powerful . there language is very powerful. there may— language is very powerful. there new ie— language is very powerful. there may be exception— language is very powerful. there may be exception as there may be people— may be exception as there may be eeeeie wne— may be exception as there may be eeeeie wne cen— may be exception as there may be people who can use— may be exception as there may be people who can use the word that we're discussing— people who can use the word that we're discussing legitimately, but we're discussing legitimately, in in— we're discussing legitimately, but i'm clearly— we're discussing legitimately, but i'm clearly not one of them. ane— but i'm clearly not one of them. and were— but i'm clearly not one of them. and you're clearly— but i'm clearly not one of them. and you're clearly not one of inen. — and you're clearly not one of inen. anci— and you're clearly not one of them. and i'm— and you're clearly not one of them. and i'm not- and you're clearly not one of them. mr: and you're clearly not one of them. ' mr: them. and i'm not one of them. and also, i think that you could use them as coconuts. i can use the word coconut. _ use them as coconuts. i can use the word coconut. now, can you use the word coconut? because it's racist, use the word coconut? because ii-e-recier, ini— use the word coconut? because it's-racist, but-i- use the word coconut? because it's-racist, but-i can. it's not racist, but i can i can ine— it's not racist, but i can i can we were— it's not racist, but i can i can use the word without any equivocation. - use the word without any equivocation. ' mr: use the word without any equivocation. mr: r: equivocation. and i'm quite happy a. equivocation. and i'm quite happy a . actually

happy to be called a. actually i think it's a nice term and i'm a loyal supporter of the holy father. but it would be offensive somebody who was offensive for somebody who was anti catholic church to go anti the catholic church to go around people. it around calling people. so it would be offensive for- mg so it would be offensive for a muslim to would be offensive for a muslim ie-wew— would be offensive for a muslim ie-wew e— would be offensive for a muslim ie-wew e ini— would be offensive for a muslim to-you a butlwould- would be offensive for a muslim to you a but would be to call you a but it would be fine— to call you a but it would be fine rer— to call you a but it would be fine for myself— to call you a but it would be fine for myself to— to call you a but it would be fine for myself to call you a. aeewning— fine for myself to call you a. aeewning wew— fine for myself to call you a. assuming you are a. rzirm assuming you are a. well, i'm on my wavi— assuming you are a. well, i'm on my way, darling. excellent.- assuming you are a. rzirm r:3” mg excellent. i'm my way, darling. excellent. i'm gree— my way, darling. excellent. i'm giee wew— my way, darling. excellent. i'm giee wew — my way, darling. excellent. i'm glad you are. but— my way, darling. excellent. i'm glad you are. but i— my way, darling. excellent. i'm glad you are. but i think it should be more about encouraging people instead of looking at this as, oh, this is this as, oh, gosh, this is wokery. and dare we change wokery. and how dare we change literature? think these literature? i think these authors we're authors are not alive now. we're doing them favour because it doing them a favour because it makes it more accessible. it makes it more accessible. it makes readers to these makes newer readers to these books and it's sort of always we're sensitive. we were so we would be so upset. it's more about making accessible and making right. you can't keep making it right. you can't keep an offensive language because that's what society is about that's not what society is about now. so. so i suppose one of the ereiiene— now. so. so i suppose one of the ereniene iner— now. so. so i suppose one of the problems that i— now. so. so i suppose one of the problems that i have— so. so i suppose one of the problems that i have with it eereeneiiw— problems that i have with it eereeneiiw ie— problems that i have with it personally is p.g. wodehouse, a verve— personally is p.g. wodehouse, a veryr wew— personally is p.g. wodehouse, a very, very talented— personally is p.g. wodehouse, a very, very talented man. and you knew,— very, very talented man. and you knew, rwe— very, very talented man. and you knew, we reen— very, very talented man. and you know, i've read his— very, very talented man. and you know, i've read his books to my cniieren— know, i've read his books to my cniieren ene— know, i've read his books to my children and they— know, i've read his books to my children and they flow beautifully— children and they flow beautifully off the tongue. and it's beautifully off the tongue. and we greei. — beautifully off the tongue. and we greer. ane— beautifully off the tongue. and it's great. and i've read mark iwein— it's great. and i've read mark iweinlweii,— it's great. and i've read mark twain well, because, you

twain as well, because, you knew,— twain as well, because, you knew, i— twain as well, because, you knew, i eie— twain as well, because, you know, i did-i- twain as well, because, you know, i did-i did- twain as well, because, you know, i did i did actually know, i did and i did actually ewee— know, i did and i did actually ewee-were— know, i did and i did actually swap-word out- know, i did and i did actually swap word out because it swap that word out because it was— swap that word out because it ee-eew,— swap that word out because it was, as-say, it's- swap that word out because it was, as say, it's just too was, as you say, it's just too nwcn.— was, as you say, it's just too nun-wew— was, as you say, it's just too much.-you-but. was, as you say, it's just too. much. _you-but what was, as you say, it's just too- much.-you-but what i'm much. there you go. but what i'm eewing— much. there you go. but what i'm eewing ie— much. there you go. but what i'm eewing ie, wee— much. there you go. but what i'm saying is, yes, there— much. there you go. but what i'm saying is, yes, there needs to be saying is, yes, there needs to ie e— saying is, yes, there needs to ire e er— saying is, yes, there needs to be a sense of moderation. but why— be a sense of moderation. but wnw ie— be a sense of moderation. but wnw ie ee— be a sense of moderation. but why is some baked why is some half baked sensitivity— why is some half baked sensitivity i've sensitivity reader? i've seen wnei— sensitivity reader? i've seen wner inew-we— sensitivity reader? i've seen what they've the roald what they've done to the roald ireni— what they've done to the roald ireni ireeke. — what they've done to the roald dahl books. why— what they've done to the roald dahl books. why why would we enewer—re— dahl books. why why would we entrust re tabulating dahl books. why why would we entr re: re tabulating dahl books. why why would we entr re scansion re tabulating dahl books. why why would we entr re scansion it re tabulating dahl books. why why would we entr re scansion it creatingating dahl books. why why would we entr re scansion it creating new and re scansion it creating new re— and re scansion it creating new scansion to the— and re scansion it creating new scansion to the greatest writers on scansion to the greatest writers en eenne — scansion to the greatest writers on earth? well,— scansion to the greatest writers on earth? �*fri�*rzill ”ri on earth? well, that's where i completely agree with you. i think what did to roald think what they did to roald dahl stupid. i don't. i dahl was stupid. i don't. i think it was correct. and cnenging— think it was correct. and changing wodehouse fundamentally think it was correct. and chaiterrible)dehouse fundamentally think it was correct. and chaiterrible idea. use fundamentally think it was correct. and chaiterrible idea. thefundamentally think it was correct. and chaiterrible idea. the reason entally is a terrible idea. the reason he's funny the illusions he's so funny is the illusions that he has his knowledge of engush that he has his knowledge of english literature that he bnngs english literature that he brings forward and what was it evelyn waugh said about criticising wodehouse? he said it was like taking a spade to a souffle. and i think that rearranging wodehouse is even worse. it's like taking whatever is worse than a spade a shovel to a souffle. it's just a few were— to a souffle. it's just a few were ir— to a souffle. it's just a few words. it doesn't- it's just a few words. it doesn't actually cnenge— words. it doesn't actually cnenge ine— words. it doesn't actually change the whole story . it change the whole story. it reeiiw— change the whole story. it reeiiw eeee— change the whole story. it really does, honestly. so the were— really does, honestly. so the were-ine- really does, honestly. so the word _the story?- really does, honestly. so the word the story? no word changes, the story? no i inink— word changes, the story? no i inink ii— word changes, the story? no i think it does— word changes, the story? no i think it does not— word changes, the story? no i think it does not change the eierw— think it does not change the eierw ,— think it does not change the ererw , in—

think it does not change the story , i'm afraid. story, i'm afraid. i think that particular word is entire distraction, because i think there's almost nobody who wants to keep that word . and if you to keep that word. and if you take the of an agatha take the title of an agatha christie, was changed years christie, that was changed years ago word ago because that word is offensive. but i think going further than that, putting a trigger warning on p.g. wodehouse, arnie trigger warning would have should have on is would have should have on it is don't places don't read in public places because you will laugh out loud and people will think you're dotty. but jacob, dotty. well, no, but jacob, were— dotty. well, no, but jacob, wee neking— r:ri; well, no, but jacob, you're making light of like you're making light of it. like even charles— you're making light of it. like even charles dickens his even charles dickens changed his eieriee. —ne- even charles dickens changed his stories. _he was- stories. he changed. he was eniiriee— stories. he changed. he was entitled—book,- entitled to. it's his book, rigni. — entitled to. it's his book, rigni. ninen— entitled to. it's his book,- right. -then-authors right. but then these authors are right. but then these authors ere-ane— right. but then these authors ere-wne nee- right. but then these authors are and had they right. but then these authors- are-and had they been are not alive. and had they been eiiwe— are not alive. and had they been enwe-ere— are not alive. and had they been alive - are _them - alive, we are doing them a reveri— alive, we are doing them a teen iner— alive, we are doing them a favour that you— alive, we are doing them a favour that you can't say making weee.— favour that you can't say making ineee.-eeing— favour that you can't say making weee-geing e— favour that you can't say making these. doing a favour of these. we are doing a favour of these. we are doing a favour of we eeen— these. we are doing a favour of we need ene— these. we are doing a favour of the dead and tell— these. we are doing a favour of the dead and tell them you're geing— the dead and tell them you're eeing cnen— the dead and tell them you're eeing rnen e— the dead and tell them you're doing them a favour. okay. are you— doing them a favour. okay. are wew eewing— doing them a favour. okay. are wew eewing-enw— doing them a favour. okay. are you saying any author you saying that any new author weee—inew- you saying that any new author uses—they can't. you saying that any new authori uses—they can't use uses the word n? they can't use iner— uses the word n? they can't use we were.— uses the word n? they can't use we were. ine— uses the word n? they can't use that word. the thing is, they. t hey— that word. the thing is, they. inew ee. rrwi— that word. the thing is, they. inew er. en i— that word. the thing is, they. they do. but i think- that word. the thing is, they. "car r:r:ir but i think we've all they do. but i think we've all egreeci— they do. but i think we've all egreee. were— they do. but i think we've all agreed. we've all— "car r:r:ir but i think we've all agreed. we've all agreed on that neriicwier—new- particular word. we're now ieeking— particular word. we're now ieeking ei— particular word. we're now looking at the— particular word. we're now looking at the more general erincieiee— looking at the more general principles idiotic trigger principles these idiotic trigger wernneg— principles these idiotic trigger warnings,-think- warnings, which i think are eeeeerereiw— desperately condescending. i rene— desperately condescending. ii rend—viewere tend to think that our viewers ene— tend to think that our viewers ene ine— tend to think that our viewers and the british— tend to think that our viewers and the british public at large are and the british public at large ere—enewgn- and the british public at large ere—enewgn ie- and the british public at large. are—enough to know are quite clever enough to know iner— are quite clever enough to know inn—wee- are quite clever enough to know

that—was living. that pg wodehouse was living nen— that pg wodehouse was living rren ine— that pg wodehouse was living from the late— that pg wodehouse was living from the late 19th through . to from the late 19th through. to the from the late 19th through. to rne rinei— from the late 19th through. to the final three— from the late 19th through. to the final three quarters of the zen— the final three quarters of the zen ceniwrw. — the final three quarters of the 20th century. he— the final three quarters of the 20th century. he was writing in a 20th century. he was writing in e inferenc— 20th century. he was writing in a different time.— 20th century. he was writing in a different time. his humour wiri— a different time. his humour wiii ire— a different time. his humour wiii ire er— a different time. his humour will be of that— a different time. his humour will be of that period. it is exireneiw— will be of that period. it is extremely funny. it lives on extraordinar— extremely funny. it lives on extraordinar eerily well. they een-i— extraordinar eerily well. they een-i nece— extraordinar eerily well. they don't need to— extraordinar eerily well. they don't need to be— extraordinar eerily well. they don't need to be warned by some. i don't need to be warned by some. i weeni— don't need to be warned by some. i wewie wenc— don't need to be warned by some. iwewie wenc ce— don't need to be warned by some. i would want to be— don't need to be warned by some. i would want to be some- don't need to be warned by some. i would want to be some my- i would want to be some my children. there was a word children. if there was a p word in there i'd to trigger in there i'd want to trigger wouldn't i wouldn't want in there i'd want to trigger woulcto: i wouldn't want in there i'd want to trigger woulcto read i wouldn't want in there i'd want to trigger woulcto read thati wouldn't want in there i'd want to trigger woulcto read that publicin't want them to read that public schoolboy or schoolboy . schoolboy or public schoolboy. well, there are a lot of public ecneeiirewe— well, there are a lot of public schoolboys mostly, i'm schoolboys in there. mostly, i'm gree— schoolboys in there. mostly, i'm grew-eie— schoolboys in there. mostly, i'm glad-old etonians- glad to say, old etonians wodehouse— glad to say, old etonians wodehouse himself. was it is cnere— wodehouse himself. was it is there-element— wodehouse himself. was it is there-element of- wodehouse himself. was it is there element of there being there an element of there being iner— there an element of there being me eeneene— there an element of there being that someone needs to mark? �*fri�*rzi that someone needs to mark? we got that someone needs to mark? we get cne— that someone needs to mark? we get the chick— that someone needs to mark? we got the thick end _ that someone needs to mark? we got the thick end of— that someone needs to mark? we got the thick end of the- that someone needs to mark? we got the thick end of the we got the thin end of the wedge, which is what we're talking about. and then obviously the is what we're talking about. and then end obviously the is what we're talking about. and then end of obviously the is what we're talking about. and then end of the obviously the is what we're talking about. and then end of the wedge,.y the is what we're talking about. and then end of the wedge, which is thick end of the wedge, which is the word that we don't want to be used. so surely should be used. so surely we should we should take the position that if it's offensive and and it's not offensive and it's and it's not offensive and it's and it's part you know, as it's just part of, you know, as jacob a historical jacob said, a historical joke, it remain in and it it should remain in and it should fictional. it's not history. okay, well, then who watches the watch? we're not changing censors changing history. who censors the censors is what i'm sort of

saying. well, actually, the rubric—ire- saying. well, actually, thei public—it's roald public and i'd say it's roald deni— public and i'd say it's roald ireni reeke— public and i'd say it's roald dahl books. i'm— public and i'd say it's roald dahl books. i'm sorry. i think iner— dahl books. i'm sorry. i think we inew— dahl books. i'm sorry. i think that they should— dahl books. i'm sorry. i think that they should have been cnengee— that they should have been changed—can'tl that they should have been- changed_can't call that they should have been- ci horsey _can't call that they should have been thorsey faced can't call that they should have been thorsey faced woman:an't call that they should have been thorsey faced woman ont call that they should have been thorsey faced woman on a:all that they should have been thorsey faced woman on a horsey a horsey faced woman on a horsey rece— a horsey faced woman on a horsey rece-ene-e— a horsey faced woman on a horsey rece-ene-e ire— a horsey faced woman on a horsey face she's eve because that face and she's eve because that cnerecier— face and she's eve because that cnerecier ie— face and she's eve because that character is actually a horrible woman.-can't you. character is actually a horrible woman. can't you why woman. now, why can't you why cen-r— woman. now, why can't you why cen-r wew— woman. now, why can't you why cen-r wew ee— woman. now, why can't you why can't you do that?— woman. now, why can't you why can't you do that? because can't you do that? why? because inererere— can't you do that? why? because therefore,-woman _ therefore, any woman with a nereew— therefore, any woman with a nereew-e— therefore, any woman with a horsey a horrible woman. horsey face is a horrible woman. go,— horsey face is a horrible woman. nor-just — horsey face is a horrible woman. nor-just ane- horsey face is a horrible woman. no,-just. and then- horsey face is a horrible woman. no, just. and then in no, no, that's just. and then in ine— no, no, that's just. and then in rne eiewgrewnci— no, no, that's just. and then in the playground, will the playground, you will call a cnie— the playground, you will call a cniie wweei.— the playground, you will call a child kwasi. i— the playground, you will call a child kwasi. i know. i think ire— child kwasi. i know. i think we nei— child kwasi. i know. i think it's not absurd. - child kwasi. i know. i think it's not absurd. ' cricyr it's not absurd. absolutely absurd. people are allowed to say things that are not invariably flattering . you can't invariably flattering. you can't expect us all going around saying there was the most beautiful and elegant in a school playground who happened to witch who wanted to turn to be a witch who wanted to turn children into mice. if you're a witch wants turn somebody witch who wants to turn somebody into mice, you're a bad person. and of luck, you're and with a bit of luck, you're ugly. quite ugly. because that's quite a good seem to remember good warning. i seem to remember you ugly people are evil. you saying ugly people are evil. i seem to remember that the witches weren't ugly because they cover themselves witches weren't ugly because theremarkably cover themselves witches weren't ugly because theremarkably cover tiand;elves witches weren't ugly because the remarkably cover tiand youis up remarkably well. no, and you couldn't when you were couldn't be sure when you were out about somebody was out and about if somebody was a witch not, because they witch or not, because they managed society managed to meld in to society charging that. now, i'm not i'm

eerw— charging that. now, i'm not i'm eerrw .— charging that. now, i'm not i'm eerrw . in— charging that. now, i'm not i'm sorry . i'm actually— £m3”g mg now, i'm not i'm sorry . i'm actually encouraging. sorry. i'm actually encouraging. rwe— sorry. i'm actually encouraging. ire—cne— sorry. i'm actually encouraging. i've—the books- sorry. i'm actually encouraging. i've—the books on. i've listened to the books on audiobooks read to audiobooks and i've read them to my children whom i've got my children of whom i've got quite a number. so i know the dahl stories quite well. i think they're bunce and they're horrible. and bunce and bean one, short one bean in one fat one, short one mean those horrible crooks. but nonetheless it couldn't- nonetheless it couldn't mean. ane— nonetheless it couldn't mean. wne-iner— nonetheless it couldn't mean. and that bombshell on the and on that bombshell on the wineew— and on that bombshell on the. wineew, —newe and on that bombshell on the- window,_have to window, we have jacob we have to finen—rren - finish. well, that's all from _wew— finish. well, that's all from _wew-reri finish. well, that's all from. me. _you,-for not me. thank you, otaku, for not wernng— me. thank you, otaku, for not werkingline— me. thank you, otaku, for not working-the first- me. thank you, otaku, for not working the first half of working for the first half of ine— working for the first half of we enew. — working for the first half of the show. thank forjoining the show. thank you for joining me the show. thank you for joining ne-ewening.— the show. thank you for joining me-evening. next- the show. thank you for joining me evening. next it is me this evening. next up, it is ine— me this evening. next up, it is we reei— me this evening. next up, it is we reer er— me this evening. next up, it is the rest of the— me this evening. next up, it is the rest of the mog. jacob, what newe — the rest of the mog. jacob, what newe -ger— the rest of the mog. jacob, what newe-gerlwee— the rest of the mog. jacob, what newe-geilwee - the rest of the mog. jacob, what have-got.us? oh,- the rest of the mog. jacob, what have got us? [j m have you got for us? oh, we've got irre— have you got for us? oh, we've got iere ei— have you got for us? oh, we've got lots of exciting things. first of all, why the bank of england a of a disaster england is a bit of a disaster and getting everything wrong. why this why have we got this inflationary problem? why isn't bank about properly? bank thinking about it properly? and prime minister's and then after prime minister's questions what is wrong questions today, what is wrong with old keir he with poor old keir starmer? he was absolutely and almost was absolutely dire and almost cringeworthy, an cringeworthy, even from an opposition point view. they opposition point of view. they must so embarrassed as must have been so embarrassed as he digging deeper he was digging himself deeper and a hole. that's and deeper into a hole. that's what happens when- and deeper into a hole. that's what happens when you- 3r: : that's what happens when you have zero erincieiee— what happens when you have zero erincieiee ene— what happens when you have zero principles and you're a flip rieeeer— principles and you're a flip rieeeerliire— principles and you're a flip flopper life and not much flopper for life and not much cenernen — flopper for life and not much charisma. ikim_ flopper for life and not much. charisma. ikim-course charisma. i kim rye of course you do. right now. that-

charisma. {i £r:ir. r:r:ir right now. that sounds you do. right now. that sounds weneenwi.— you do. right now. that sounds wonderful. look— r:r:ir right now. that sounds wonderful. look forward to eeeing— wonderful. look forward to eeeing your— wonderful. look forward to seeing you, we'll have seeing you, jacob. we'll have iner— seeing you, jacob. we'll have inn—firew- seeing you, jacob. we'll have that—first, the. that up next. but first, the weeiner— that up next. but first, the weather now. _ that up next. but first, the weather now. 3: m mg that up next. but first, the- weather now. good evening. this is latest weather update is your latest weather update from office . name from the met office. my name is alex deakin will be a bit alex deakin and it will be a bit of a chilly tomorrow, but of a chilly start tomorrow, but generally a fine and sunny day. still easterly breeze still that easterly breeze making things feel fairly fresh on the east coast. high pressure sitting just to the north and around the high . that wind around the high. that wind continuing come in from the continuing to come in from the east. brisk winds bringing a east. so brisk winds bringing a chilly feel to score borough and cromer in particular. whereas further west we'll have again the winds a little lighter for most places, though, it's a clear old night, most places, though, it's a clear old night , just some misty clear old night, just some misty conditions maybe over the pennines it's to stay pennines and it's going to stay dry pretty much everywhere. temperatures away. so temperatures will fall away. so feeling fresh down to 2 or 3 celsius, even in some towns and cities and a few pockets of frost are possible, particularly on high ground across scotland and northern and the and northern england. and the high of northern england high ground of northern england could misty and could be a little bit misty and murky thing tomorrow. but murky first thing tomorrow. but that clear and then that should clear away. and then generally, of sunshine generally, a lot of sunshine until the afternoon. we'll

until come the afternoon. we'll start to see cloud and perhaps some outbreaks of rain spilling in from the east into east anglia in the far south—east. the possibility of a little bit of mist on the north sea coast as well. and certainly it will be chilly again, 11 to 12 be chilly here again, 11 to 12 degrees best. some of the degrees at best. some of the coastal resorts or 10 coastal resorts only 9 or 10 celsius, whereas further west, again, 16 to 17 degrees west in scotland. again likely to see the temperatures, scotland. again likely to see the notamperatures, scotland. again likely to see the notamper as res, scotland. again likely to see the notamper as high scotland. again likely to see the notamperas high as although not quite as high as today. then that cloud and outbreaks of rain start to spill further westwards as we go through the evening time and could turn into quite a wet start to friday across parts of northern england and some heavy showers likely to come into the south—east, too. and that's how we go into friday. so a very different day for england and wales, whereas scotland and northern ireland still largely fine sunny. that fine and sunny. still that easterly breeze as well, but without the sunshine stuck under this rainy zone through lincolnshire, norfolk into parts of yorkshire, lancashire will feel very pleasant at all 10 or 11 celsius further south, some brighter spells. but again,

western scotland likely to be warmest .

away . away. . i hello. away-- . hello. good away. hello. good evening. it's me, jacob - hello. good evening. it's me, jacob neee-megg— - hello. good evening. it's me, jacob rees—mogg,_the jacob rees—mogg, on state of the weiien— jacob rees—mogg, on state of the weiien-ine— jacob rees—mogg, on state of the nation-the bank- jacob rees—mogg, on state of the nation-the bank of- nation tonight. the bank of ingiene— nation tonight. the bank of ingiene nee— nation tonight. the bank of england has one statutory duty to england has one statutory duty re keen— england has one statutory duty to keep inflation— england has one statutory duty to keep inflation below 2. why nee— to keep inflation below 2. why nee ii— to keep inflation below 2. why has it failed— to keep inflation below 2. why has it failed so— to keep inflation below 2. why has it failed so badly? and why eeee— has it failed so badly? and why eeee ii— has it failed so badly? and why eeee ii ner— has it failed so badly? and why does it not recognise the reasons for its- does it not recognise the reasons for its failure? i'll be ieiiing— reasons for its failure? i'll be reiiing wew— reasons for its failure? i'll be reiiing wew wnw— reasons for its failure? i'll be telling you why i— reasons for its failure? i'll be telling you why i think the bank neede— telling you why i think the bank neeee e— telling you why i think the bank needs a shake— telling you why i think the bank needs a shake up.— telling you why i think the bank needs a shake up. and what is ine— needs a shake up. and what is we newer— needs a shake up. and what is the matter with— needs a shake up. and what is the matter with keir starmer? nee— the matter with keir starmer? ne-e e— the matter with keir starmer? ne-e e knigni— the matter with keir starmer? he's a knight and he's a king's cewnciiien— he's a knight and he's a king's councillor. he— he's a knight and he's a king's councillor. he has— he's a knight and he's a king's councillor. he has the perfect cv councillor. he has the perfect cv ie— councillor. he has the perfect cv re ire— councillor. he has the perfect cv re ire ine— councillor. he has the perfect cv to be the leader of the eeeeeirien. — cv to be the leader of the opposition. but- cv to be the leader of the opposition. but at pmqs today he ie— opposition. but at pmqs today he was, to paraphrase— opposition. but at pmqs today he was, to paraphrase a certain rerner— was, to paraphrase a certain rerrner nine— was, to paraphrase a certain former prime minister, captain , former prime minister, captain, rieeeere— former prime minister, captain, floppers snoozefest constitution

neede—