about what says you on that . and about what says you on that. and tony blair, brace yourself . he's tony blair, brace yourself. he's been speaking since today. everybody he's saying, how can britain solve the climate crisis ultimately without (ihina.7 he says they can't. and i say he's right. but what do you make to the whole tony blair situation, though? is he trying to make an edge into getting back into frontline politics in this country? and if he did , would country? and if he did, would you support him and have you heard of the so—called ghost children covid? apparently many children covid? apparently many children didn't return to school after it. what's going on? there's concerns now that we are tiptoeing towards a huge crime wave caused by these children . wave caused by these children. is that true? why are kids not returning to schools ? by the returning to schools? by the way, when you see some of the stuff that's getting taught in schools, i don't blame some parents for taking their children far away from them anyway. over in mid bedfordshire, nadine dorries, do anyway. over in mid bed rememberiadine dorries, do anyway. over in mid bed remember she1e dorries, do anyway. over in mid bed remember she resigned.. do anyway. over in mid bed remember she resigned. she you remember she resigned. she said she going to go said she was going to go immediately well, town immediately. well, flint town council saying , go on then,

council are saying, go on then, off because of course off you go. because of course she has not gone anywhere. do you think she should should there be a by—election? should she be allowed to resign and basically absolute nothing basically do absolute nothing about thoughts on all about it? your thoughts on all of that? we'll have it all to come. but first, we get come. but first, shall we get the tatiana the headlines with tatiana sanchez. >> michel, thank you very much. and good evening. this is the latest from the newsroom. plans to move 2000 migrants to scampton in lincolnshire have been delayed until october. officials had indicated the first group would begin arriving at the former air base in august . it comes as the home office is reported preparing to erect marquees to accommodate 2000 people at the manston airfield in kent by the end of august. there are warnings it could trigger legal challenges based on inhumane treatment . the ultra on inhumane treatment. the ultra low emission zone is set to be expanded in london after a high court ruled the plan is lawful .

court ruled the plan is lawful. legal action was brought by five conservative led councils . it conservative led councils. it means drivers will pay a £12.50 daily fee if their vehicles do not meet the required emission standards. a spokesperson for the aa says the ruling is hugely disappointing, but it hopes london will follow other cities by adopting measures to reduce the impact on those who can't afford it. the london mayor, sadiq khan, says there will be support the decision to expand the ultra low emission zone was a difficult one, not one i took lightly. >> but it's essential. next week there will be a massive expansion of the support we give to families, to businesses and charities. as it is , 96% of cars charities. as it is, 96% of cars ininner charities. as it is, 96% of cars in inner london are compliant. nine out of ten cars in outer london are compliant. they won't pay a london are compliant. they won't pay a penny more from august 29th, but we'll see the benefits of clean air. but i'll carry on listening to see what more support can give the support we can give the chancellor says no decisions have made on compensation have been made on compensation for of the contaminated

for victims of the contaminated blood scandal, while thousands of people contracted hiv and hepatitis after being given contaminated blood products in the 1970s and 80s jeff hunt told the 1970s and 80s jeff hunt told the official infected blood inquiry the injustice is being addressed . addressed. >> we totally understand the urgency of this situation . you urgency of this situation. you know, we recognise the fact that , as i think i wrote in a letter before i was chancellor , that before i was chancellor, that one person is dying approximately every four days and there is a need forjustice and there is a need for justice to be as quick as possible for what has been a terrible scandal over a 14 year old boy has been arrested following a hit and run in walsall . in walsall. >> a seven year old girl was taken to hospital in a critical condition but later died of her injuries. police say the incident happened shortly after 7:00 yesterday evening . they're 7:00 yesterday evening. they're now looking for a blue and black motor cycle. the teenager

remains in custody . natwest has remains in custody. natwest has appointed a law firm to conduct an independent review following the closure of nigel farage bank account. it comes as the banking group announces profits of £3.6 billion for the first half of the year. both the group's ceo, dame alison rose and coutts boss peter flavel resigned this week . former bank of england and treasury adviser dr. roger gavel told gb news as any bank bosses who have wrongfully closed people's accounts should be fired. i think there should be an investigation . an investigation. >> mr griffith. the city minister. should i would suggest, start an investigation immediately, not next year with a paper that we get in when our grand children can read it next week into every bank that did this. and over the last several years has or has has cancelled people and closed their accounts without reason and any directors or officers or management involved in that should go .

involved in that should go. >> former us president donald trump and two of his employees are facing new charges in the classified documents case. it's claimed trump ordered employees at his florida resort to delete security videos whilst he was under investigation for retaining classified documents. the former president now faces 40 charges in the case. trump's team say this is nothing more than a continued desperate attempt by the biden crime family to harass donald trump . family to harass donald trump. holidaymakers affected by wildfires in greece say they're struggling to get refunds despite the fires that are ravaging the island of rhodes. some airlines are continuing to operate flights , meaning that operate flights, meaning that travellers are unable to claim their money back. thousands of british tourists have been evacuated from the island. the foreign office is advising those travelling to fire affected areas to be cautious. tv travelling to fire affected areas to be cautious . tv online areas to be cautious. tv online dab+ radio and on tune in this is gb news. now it's back to .

michelle >> thanks for that. tatiana michelle dewberry till 7:00 tonight. alongside me , filmmaker tonight. alongside me, filmmaker and the director of youth education charity world right. kerry dingle and the writer and broadcaster paul embery. welcome to both of you and welcome back. i've not seen you for a little while. nice to have you. you know the drill as well, don't you? on dewbs& co it's not just about us three. it is about you at home. what's on your mind tonight? the tonight? it's nearly the weekend. yes, weekends mean weekend. yes, the weekends mean anything is it just anything to you or is it just another day? do you have to go out and work tomorrow anyway? get me tonight. get in touch with me tonight. vaiews@gbnews.com. get in touch with me tonight. vaieime gbnews.com. get in touch with me tonight. vaieime atnews.com. get in touch with me tonight. vaieime at gb's.com. get in touch with me tonight. vaieime at gb news. i'm running tweet me at gb news. i'm running a poll as well on twitter and fascinated as to your thoughts on of course, on nadine dorries. of course, she her resignation she announced her resignation with effect. with immediate effect. apparently was back apparently well, that was back in nothing really has in june and nothing really has happened and now of happened since. and now one of the town has said that the town councils has said that she resign and with

she should resign and leave with the media effect and trigger a by—election what says you on twitter? you twitter? luke says, if you publicly announce your intentions step down, you intentions to step down, you automatically unqualified automatically become unqualified for public office. he says . we for public office. he says. we should have mps prepared to fight for communities and we should expect nothing less. what are your thoughts on that? if you're on twitter, jump on board. let me know your thoughts on and i'll be coming on that poll and i'll be coming to topic before the end of to that topic before the end of the but for now, the the program. but for now, the home office trouble again. home office in trouble again. i don't a week goes by, don't think a week goes by, quite when suella quite frankly, when suella braverman in trouble for braverman isn't in trouble for something. today it's her something. but today it's her idea to get tents, marquees, whatever you want to call them. it's all about trying to, i would say content agency plan because the weather i mean, it's supposed to be summer, isn't it? was supposed to have nice weather. i'm sure it's coming, but the nicer the weather, the more inclined to cross. more people inclined to cross. so trying to be proactive, so she's trying to be proactive, trying to be front footed rather than have to buy lots of last minute hotel rooms. she's got a brainwave of basically these marquees that will house up to

2000 people. these will be potentially on military bases . potentially on military bases. what do you make to them ? paul what do you make to them? paul mbappe, i shall start with you . mbappe, i shall start with you. >> i don't object to them ideologically . i think the key ideologically. i think the key thing is, look , you know, the thing is, look, you know, the people coming over, whatever we might think about the collapse of a proper immigration system , of a proper immigration system, i mean, these people are human beings . they be treated beings. they need to be treated as human beings. we need to make sure that they are housed in conditions that are safe, that are secure, where they've got the basic amenities that are necessary. now, whether that's a hotel, i don't have a particular issue with that, whether it's an issue with that, whether it's an issue with that, whether it's an issue with people being in hotels . no, issue with people being in hotels. no, i don't. i don't because for me, star hotels, you know , because for me, that's know, because for me, that's never been the main issue here. and i think the problem is that when people get into the debate about, oh, well, we're putting them in hotels for me, that's them up in hotels for me, that's a distraction from the central issue. here, issue. when people come here, whether here legally whether they come here legally or not, they're human beings

once they need once they arrive and they need to in secure safe to be housed in secure and safe accommodation. know, we accommodation. you know, we can't people homeless can't just leave people homeless when we do leave, people say, well, we do, and we well, we do, we do, and we should ashamed but we should be ashamed of it. but we shouldn't people homeless. shouldn't leave people homeless. so me, whether not it's so for me, whether or not it's a hotel, whether it's a premier inn whether it's a 4 or 5 inn or whether it's a 4 or 5 star whatever, or whether star hotel, whatever, or whether it's is decent it's a marquee which is decent and and secure and the and safe and secure and has the bafic and safe and secure and has the basic amenities. me, it's basic amenities. for me, it's not issue. the issue is and not the issue. the issue is and i don't think, by the way, that the individual migrants should be i'm in favour the individual migrants should be demonstrations in favour the individual migrants should be demonstrations outside our the individual migrants should be demonstrations outside ofr of demonstrations outside of migrant stuff like of demonstrations outside of migre for stuff like of demonstrations outside of migre for me, stuff like of demonstrations outside of migre for me, the stuff like of demonstrations outside of migre for me, the issue jff like of demonstrations outside of migrefor me, the issue is like of demonstrations outside of migrefor me, the issue is how that. for me, the issue is how we to a situation where our we got to a situation where our immigration system, frankly, has collapsed, cannot collapsed, where we cannot control borders despite the control our borders despite the many promises government many promises from government that address the that they will address the situation, they haven't and nobody have ideas nobody seems to have any ideas in terms how to address that, in terms of how to address that, that the that for everybody in the country and there are millions who got issues over the who have got issues over the poor regulation of our immigration system, that should be where the focus should lie, rather than, i think debates about hotels and stuff. >> yeah, i've got to say, i've got a problem with being

got a problem with hotels being used way. you say, oh, used in this way. you say, oh, 4 or 5 star hotels, whatever. i think it's an absolute scandal. i think a disgrace that £7 i think it's a disgrace that £7 million or there or thereabouts a on hotels. this a day is spent on hotels. this whole situation about the marquees , if this was going to marquees, if this was going to be your idea, why wasn't it be your idea, then why wasn't it implemented some time ago be your idea, then why wasn't it implsave|ted some time ago be your idea, then why wasn't it implsave those some time ago be your idea, then why wasn't it implsave those wastinga time ago be your idea, then why wasn't it implsave those wasting , time ago be your idea, then why wasn't it implsave those wasting , i me ago be your idea, then why wasn't it implsave those wasting , i would) ? to save those wasting, i would say wasting of money in the hotels, in the first place. but anyway, kerry, what do you make to all? >> well, i think i do think it's paups >> well, i think i do think it's paul's got an important point that it's immigration has become an unhealthy obsession. the problem is problem with the obsession is that only does it have that not only does it have anti—human consequences, but it doesn't problem. doesn't deal with the problem. and people and the problem is people risking their necks getting on small boats. and i think that's a absolute human disaster and tragedy. >> but it's also a human choice, though, isn't it? >> yeah, it's wilful . though, isn't it? >> yeah, it's wilful. but though, isn't it? >> yeah, it's wilful . but the >> yeah, it's wilful. but the thing is, we haven't thought about how to stop that. and whether i have no problem with tents, you know, i think it's ridiculous that people have come out this is out and said this is concentration and all the concentration camps and all the rest of it. that's nonsense. i think being in a tent can be

great. think that's rubbish great. so i think that's rubbish . aren't dealing with it . but we aren't dealing with it and i we have to deal with and i think we have to deal with it more rational way it in a much more rational way instead of millions on hotels, we employing loads of we could be employing loads of graduates deal with the graduates to deal with the 75,000 who've been waiting nearly three years for to get processed. they're being given vouchers and money and accommodation and it's not being deau accommodation and it's not being dealt with. that's that's scandalous. we're not providing legal routes which we could then say, go through the legal process. these people are able to secure money to pay people with boats. so go through the legal routes like friends of mine have from ghana and from kenya and from elsewhere. and they'll do it legally . if you they'll do it legally. if you get turned down, that's it. you're not going to get anything. you're it's a criminal offence. >> what do you mean? when you say there's an unhealthy obsession with immigration? what do you mean? well it's, you know, day they, you know, if every day they, you know, if every day they, you know, whether it's the tents and yesterday it's the barges and

another day it's something else i >> -- >> you know, the government fails . >> you know, the government fails. failing to fix this means they are dumping people in all sorts of places is unhealthily, you know , a whole load of men on you know, a whole load of men on a military base in a small village. >> i thought you meant it's unhealthy to discuss this issue . i thought that's what you meant. no, i think we should discuss issue, i think discuss this issue, but i think we should discuss proper solutions. >> actually . and. and also, >> actually. and. and also, i would say i don't see i don't see immigrants as a big problem in britain. i think our failure to deal with people drowning is a big problem. >> would you be in favour of open borders, though? kerry yeah, i've always supported open borders. >> hang on, need to just >> hang on, i need to just rewind right, right. how do you where do i even begin? right. first you just first and foremost, you just said our failure to deal with people drowning . what are you people drowning. what are you talking about? people drowning. what are you talking abcgetting on small boats >> people getting on small boats and risking their neck or climbing under lorries. >> responsibility is it? if climbing under lorries. >.grownresponsibility is it? if climbing under lorries. >.grown adult|sibility is it? if climbing under lorries. >.grown adult decidesis it? if climbing under lorries. >.grown adult decides to t? if climbing under lorries. >.grown adult decides to dof a grown adult decides to do that. but . that. yeah, but. >> well, the trouble is, it

>> but. well, the trouble is, it does become our responsibility and need prevent that and we need to prevent that happening. we to happening. don't we want to do that? would rather have to that? or would we rather have to spend loads of money and create havoc villages with no resources? >> and then did you just say to paul that you're in favour of open borders? >> yes, i've always supported open because i've open borders and because i've always that the always thought that the arguments immigrants as arguments about immigrants as open i suppose, open as possible, i suppose, would be how i'd put it. according to people's democratic wish . you know, i wouldn't be wish. you know, i wouldn't be for enforcing it on anyone. so i didn't like , you know, the didn't like, you know, the attempt to open up europe and force people right. to come here on working class people as though they needed a lesson in anti racism because that was the tenor of that debate at the time. but i've never thought numbers, population numbers were the big problem in britain . the big problem in britain. >> i think it is the problem, though, because i think when you speak to most mainstream people in this country , i think the in this country, i think the view of ordinary people by and large is that they are pro—immigration and they understand the benefits of

immigration. understand the benefits of immigration . they don't think, immigration. they don't think, you know, we want to we want to shut the gates. no one should be allowed in. but at the same time, people believe that the system got to be regulated system has got to be regulated properly and system has got properly and the system has got to managed properly the to be managed properly and the numbers have to be modest. to be managed properly and the numifars have to be modest. to be managed properly and the numif they|ve to be modest. to be managed properly and the numif they see to be modest. to be managed properly and the numif they see that» be modest. to be managed properly and the numif they see that that�*nodest. to be managed properly and the numif they see that that system and if they see that that system is being managed properly and the numbers are modest, think the numbers are modest, i think people more inclined to people are much more inclined to say, okay, we can say, yeah, this is okay, we can absorb we're comfortable absorb this, we're comfortable with can with with this, we can live with this. i think what's happened in this. i think what's happened in this is about 20, 25 this country is about 20, 25 years ago under blair years ago under the blair government, where adopted government, where he adopted a very immigration policy. very liberal immigration policy. and had eu accession in and then we had eu accession in 2004 with the eastern european countries. and all of a sudden we did see a very, very rapid and large scale increase in the numbers , and we had no means of numbers, and we had no means of integrating these people. we had no how to integrate no idea about how to integrate these people. we had no proper dispersal policy. generally dispersal policy. and generally what working what happened, kerry, is working class told, okay, class areas were told, okay, you're deal this you're going to deal with this because invariably happens because invariably what happens is immigrants come, is when poorer immigrants come, they to they will invariably go to working areas and working working class areas and working class that were already

class areas that were already hard pressed and people were told, this up. you told, look, suck this up. you can with and you know can deal with this. and you know what? shouldn't really what? you shouldn't really complain will enrich complain because it will enrich you sense. it you in an economic sense. it will enrich you in a cultural sense. and people and people and people actually disagree with you on these points. >> you feel the didn't >> you feel the point didn't feel enriched all. feel enriched at all. >> point about limits is not >> the point about limits is not a about, you know , did did a about, you know, did did people want all these people to come over ? come over? >> were they put upon by blair? they were. in order to educate them, as you know, or you've got all these working class bigoted people. let's just let immigrants come in and they can suckit immigrants come in and they can suck it up. the problem i've always felt with is that the argument about too many people and too many people in britain, too many people in the world, the overpopulation idea means that instead of fighting to grow the cake and create more so that we could all have more, you limit it and you very easily target the other target . target the other target. >> how do you grow an island ? >> how do you grow an island? >> how do you grow an island? >> i don't mean grow a landmass

, michelle. i know, but with the resources . resources. >> but the yes, but this country is a certain amount of size. and it's a certain amounts of density at the with the population as it stands at the moment, we've got a certain amount of infrastructure as it stands moment. what? stands at the moment. so what? >> haven't got massive >> but we haven't got massive population growth, immigration or no immigration, actually we've falling birth rate we've got a falling birth rate and wasn't immigrants that and there wasn't immigrants that caused lack of housing or caused the lack of housing or immigrants that caused crappy education, but immigrants that put people out of jobs. education, but immigrants that put people out of jobs . and put people out of jobs. and that's the limits of government. >> but the truth too many people are. >> the truth is, though, kerry, you're right. it would be absurd for someone to say that an immigrant put out of a immigrant has put me out of a job or, you know, why would that be absurd? >> because eu expanded >> because when the eu expanded to the eastern bloc and of to the eastern bloc and a lot of poush to the eastern bloc and a lot of polish in, polish people came in, for example, would be a lot of example, there would be a lot of british plumbers that were out of because they were of business because they were undercut not charge, undercut well, not under charge, but cheaper rates by but there were cheaper rates by the i get the polish market. so that i get that to forget that what that thing to forget that what i'm saying is what i'm saying is, michelle, it be unfair

is, michelle, it would be unfair to individual to target an individual immigrant that you immigrant and to say that you are responsible putting are responsible for putting me out job. are responsible for putting me outi job. are responsible for putting me outi thinkb. are responsible for putting me outi think that is the >> i think that is the completely wrong way to go about it. i think the people responsible and you know, of course, we can say, well, okay, we're not going blame we're not going to blame immigrants the immigrants personally for the fact under fact that wages are under pressure is under pressure or housing is under pressure, but there pressure, etcetera. but there can't any serious doubt. can't be any serious doubt. surely have a very surely that if you have a very liberal immigration policy, as we've country at we've had in this country for at least last 20 years, and we least the last 20 years, and we haven't invested properly in infrastructure. yeah, and we haven't, all of haven't, you know, done all of the that are necessary in the things that are necessary in terms and terms of improving and increasing housing supply to increasing the housing supply to accommodate of course increasing the housing supply to acco to nodate of course increasing the housing supply to accoto going�* of course increasing the housing supply to accoto going impact. of course increasing the housing supply to accoto going impact. andf course increasing the housing supply to accoto going impact. and it:ourse it is to going impact. and it doesn't mean the individual personal immigrants are responsible, mean responsible, but it does mean that is that the government is responsible. the truth responsible. you know, the truth is, if with wages, for example , is, if with wages, for example, if you what marks called a if you have what marks called a reserve army of labour, which is waiting there to fill your space, then invariably employers are to think, well, this space, then invariably employers are me to think, well, this space, then invariably employers are me the :hink, well, this space, then invariably employers are me the opportunitythis space, then invariably employers are me the opportunity to; space, then invariably employers are me the opportunity to hold gives me the opportunity to hold down wages, because if that person doesn't want to do it for this wage, then i've people this wage, then i've got people coming will prepared this wage, then i've got people co d0|g will prepared this wage, then i've got people co do it will prepared this wage, then i've got people co do it for will prepared this wage, then i've got people

co do it for that nlll prepared this wage, then i've got people co do it for that wage. prepared this wage, then i've got people co do it for that wage. sozpared to do it for that wage. so employers, for example, will always less pressure to always be under less pressure to deliver better wages than larger. the labour supply that is available to them. >> and there will be people at home at the telly. zack home shouting at the telly. zack and all the way from my and er you all the way from my seat here and you'll be shouting about population growth when people not people say, well it's not expanding the population. of course had net migration of course we had net migration of i think 606,000 people in the last year you tell me year alone. anyway, you tell me what you make to that situation and the solution, and what is the solution, because do go around because we do go around in circles. we seem to be chipping away at the edges when comes away at the edges when it comes to harebrained here, to harebrained schemes here, there you there and everywhere. but, you know, until stop people know, until you stop people making journey, as kerry making that journey, as kerry says, this problem says, ultimately this problem is going absolutely nowhere . next going absolutely nowhere. next up, want to talk tony up, i want to talk about tony blair. he been out and about blair. he has been out and about today about climate today speaking about climate change, ultimately change, saying that ultimately we of these little we passing all of these little measures like very expensive measures like very expensive measures onto us to try and fix climate change will be irrelevant unless china follows suit and makes big changes. is he right ? you suit and makes big changes. is he right? you tell me

hello there. i'm michelle dewberry with you until 7:00 tonight. alongside me, the filmmaker and the director of youth education charity worldwide, kerry dingle and the writer and broadcast star paul embry . lots of you guys getting embry. lots of you guys getting in touch about that last conversation there doesn't seem to be a huge pushback against the tents. you don't seem to be echoing those calls where people are saying it's inhumane and all the rest of it. i'm always fascinated by what are the answers because how you accommodate people once they've got here is one thing, but how do you prevent people getting here or choosing to come here? should i say, in the first place? that $1 million place? that is $1 million question. answer to question. what's your answer to it? get in touch and let me know. now. former minister know. now. former prime minister tony has been speaking tony blair, he has been speaking out debate. he out on the climate debate. he reckons and i've got to say, i actually agree with him on this point, but what he's saying is that we're doing this net that we're doing all this net zero stuff here, of are zero stuff here, all of us are having extra costs on

having to incur extra costs on various bits and various different bits and pieces and what is the point of it? and actually, we all this it? and actually, we do all this eat drive different eat less meat, drive different cars, boilers and cars, with our boilers and whatever so on and so whatever it is, so on and so forth. but if china changed, nothing, it's all a little nothing, then it's all a little bit is not? kerry bit irrelevant. is it not? kerry i'll start with you on this one. i'll start with you on this one. i with him. do think i agree with him. do you think he makes good point or not? he makes a good point or not? well i think lot of things well i think a lot of things that we're doing are not essence. >> and i do think we should have a referendum on net zero, because think most of is because i think most of that is nonsense. but he's also fact light because china light is. blair because china leads the world leads the way it's the world leader in solar panels. it's got access and is now the world leader in rare earth minerals . leader in rare earth minerals. that's what they need to make batteries . it's head of the game batteries. it's head of the game in electric cars. so even though overall they're china has more emissions because of its vast population on is way ahead on the climate change front. so it's very fact like what he's saying and it's the thing is that blair a i can't believe a

word he says, to be honest, but he is pontificating on the world stage and trying to find ways to, i think back starmer after the uxbridge revolt over ulez really, and i think is you've got to understand that blair is someone who questions is the austerity measures that come with the apocalypse nightmare that we're supposed to be facing, which i think is rubbish . he goes along with those things. i was in ghana when blair was going around africa, telling poor people they shouldn't have what we have with his sustainer babble, you know. >> but but it is whatever they're doing , that's good. and they're doing, that's good. and i'm sure it's all fascinating. but facts do remain that but the facts do remain that they produce about 28% of the they do produce about 28% of the world's global emissions when it comes carbon dioxide. and comes to carbon dioxide. and that problem. guess that is a problem. and i guess this point. we're all this is his point. we're all being told and add this onto your for bill green levies here, eat meat. we're going eat less meat. we're going to do this with and all the this with your cars and all the rest of it. for what? because if those emissions don't come down, then is kind irrelevant.

then it is kind of irrelevant. but there's i think there's but there's also i think there's another we have dig, i think another we have to dig, i think further beneath the surface, not just at the amount of just look at the amount of emissions because global warming in some regards has got positive benefits. >> you know , there are far less >> you know, there are far less deaths from heat than the 60,000 deaths from heat than the 60,000 deaths that happened from cold, for example . that happened for example. that happened between 2000 and 2019. you know, 60 odd thousand deaths from cold, 2000 from heat, global warming is can be good and carbon emissions are necessary in terms of a greener planet. carbon emissions are necessary in terms of a greener planet . so in terms of a greener planet. so we should just calm down about climate change. i'm not climate change sceptic or denier , but i change sceptic or denier, but i think we should get it in perspective and think about what do we want, what sort of society do we want, what sort of society do we want and what do people need ? and that is more energy, need? and that is more energy, more development globally , more development globally, ability to grow our economy so we can better meet people's needs and less of this hysteria

about apocalyptic climate change, whether it's on a global level, global. >> blair i ate it cold today , >> blair i ate it cold today, not global warming, global boiling . paul, your thoughts? boiling. paul, your thoughts? i i think that every now and then tony blair, who's clearly not an unintelligent guy and he's a good political operator, he will come out with something where it's quite profound and it's quite sensible. >> and you think people really ought to listen to him. i think the difficult party, the guy's got to be blunt, is i think iraq has pretty much destroyed his credibility , largely so whenever credibility, largely so whenever so whenever , whenever he does, so whenever, whenever he does, you know, hold forth on on great global issues like this, people are just inclined to go. yeah, but you took us into that disastrous war in iraq. it was an absolute calamity. the biggest foreign policy blunder in this country since suez, arguably including suez. so we're not to going listen to you, mate. so in that . you, mate. so in that. >> but do listen to him >> but people do listen to him because the blair institute because the tony blair institute is and something like 63 is huge. and something like 63 million revenue last year. it's

got hundreds of staff they talk about embedded in about being embedded in government . government. >> people within the upper >> some people within the upper echelons undoubtedly >> some people within the upper ecilisten undoubtedly >> some people within the upper ecilisten to undoubtedly >> some people within the upper ecilisten to him. undoubtedly >> some people within the upper ecilisten to him. think ubtedly >> some people within the upper ecilisten to him. think somely do listen to him. i think some of including in labour of them, including in the labour party, would like to see him back charge to be perfectly back in charge to be perfectly honest. know, honest. and would. you know, i certainly wouldn't. and foreign governments . think, governments as well. i think, you especially the you know, especially on the continent listen him. continent, we'll listen to him. but think he's right on but i do think he's right on this need to be careful this that we need to be careful aboutin this that we need to be careful about in inflicting a huge amount of punishment on ourselves when in fact in terms of global emissions, what we actually produce and what we might save in terms of global emissions is going to be a drop in the ocean on a on a global level. so i think there's an argument to say, look, why are we putting the country through this? and mainly it's going to be ordinary people who are going to price of it when we to pay the price of it when we know renewables unreliable, know renewables are unreliable, when go to a cliff edge when we could go to a cliff edge transition, all of that, what that might mean in terms jobs that might mean in terms of jobs and industries industries and industries and industries going business and the going out of business and the lights out and people lights going out and people not being their houses

being able to heat their houses and there does seem to and stuff. so there does seem to be kind of mad rush in the be this kind of mad rush in the way that i would describe it is i we should all be i think we should all be environmental analysts. i'm as green next person, but green as the next person, but where have embraced , where we should have embraced, if you like. >> moderate. moderate. moderate. >> moderate. moderate. moderate. >> environmentalism >> moderate. environmentalism what we've done is we've embraced militant environmentalism and likes environmentalism and the likes of greta thunberg. >> do do all the stuff that >> do you do all the stuff that you should be doing to make yourself as kind of whatever the word carbon neutral or word is, carbon neutral or whatever it is? >> do what i think most >> yeah, i do what i think most families probably in this families probably do in this country. you know, i'll recycle and i need to make sure turn and i need to make sure i turn the off. if one's the lights off. if no one's using there's no using them and there's no movement to destroy planet, movement to destroy the planet, there's nobody around. >> no viewer will be thinking, oh, i'd really like to screw things up for the environment that doesn't exist. so why be an environmentalist? you know , is environmentalist? you know, is the world really about to expire ? >> and 7 >> and that's not the point. no. why are we not? >> you're right. we are being put through, you know, green

austerity . what on earth for? austerity. what on earth for? >> for the greater good. so some would argue the environmentalist would argue the environmentalist would sit here and say that actually if they would argue that man made climate change is a thing and if man make changes to their habits and their behaviours right now, then for the greater good in the long term, that be a positive term, that will be a positive thing, i think for the greater goodin thing, i think for the greater good in the long term. >> if and there are an >> if and there are is an anthropomorphic there is anthropomorphic effect, there is anthropomorphic effect, there is a human effect. what we need is more more development so more money, more development so that we can offset the effects so that we can have , if we need so that we can have, if we need them, air conditioning so that we can have you nicer vehicles and better development. so you know what i mean . so it's know what i mean. so it's development that can offset these problems. people at the moment are dying in algeria and tunisia . they're not dying in tunisia. they're not dying in the more developed parts of the world where there's a heat wave . that's purely about . and that's purely about development . development. >> do you make to it >> but what do you make to it all? i've got to say that there's a few people here saying they view about tony they share your view about tony blair credibility blair and his credibility and all it. i always

all the rest of it. i always struggle to listen to climate lectures about i have lectures about how much i have to my life, whether it's to change my life, whether it's the food or whatever the cars or the food or whatever it flying whatever. it is, my flying or whatever. i always struggle to take advice from people that think it's absolutely into absolutely cool to get into private go jetting private jets and go jetting around the world to have conferences and conversations with best friends and with their best friends and their all the of their allies and all the rest of it. know why. maybe i'm it. i don't know why. maybe i'm just being a little bit childish, but there's just something about because if something about that, because if you change habits, you want me to change my habits, then you lead by then why don't you lead by example? what i always example? that's what i always think. anyway, let's talk kids after shall we? so after the break, shall we? so many them are now absent from many of them are now absent from school. al, what is going i school. al, what is going on? i want to have a look at that. but we've about climate we've been talking about climate change, it'd rude, change, so it'd be rude, wouldn't at the wouldn't it, to not, look at the weather warm feeling inside weather that warm feeling inside from boilers, proud from boxt boilers, proud sponsors of weather on . gb news. sponsors of weather on. gb news. >> hello there. i'm jonathan vautrey draghi here with your latest gb news weather forecast provided by the met office . hope provided by the met office. hope you're able to enjoy some of the sunniest spells did see sunniest spells we did see around but into the

around today, but into the weekend there is the increasing chance that some showers chance that we see some showers and is all thanks this and that is all thanks to this area pressure. that is area of low pressure. that is pushing in the pushing its way in from the north—west. those isobars squeezing together. so we'll turn into the turn quite blustery into the weekend and those weekend as well. and those frontal that saw frontal systems that you saw bringing swathes showers bringing in swathes of showers first during overnight first thing during the overnight penod first thing during the overnight period of western period for parts of western scotland into northern scotland down into northern england also the england and wales. also the potential for another band pushing southeast potential for another band pushing just southeast potential for another band pushing just some heast potential for another band pushing just some uncertainty potential for another band puregardsust some uncertainty potential for another band puregards to some uncertainty potential for another band pu regards to the ne uncertainty potential for another band pu regards to the positioning|ty potential for another band puregards to the positioning of in regards to the positioning of that definitely some that one, but definitely some heavy rain possible. heavy pulses of rain possible. first thing on saturday. not going cold night at all. going to be a cold night at all. actually in actually pretty mild in the southeast, slightly southeast, but slightly fresher further west, lows further towards the west, lows of around 12 to 13 c on saturday, then turns into a day of sunshine and showers for the vast majority of us, particularly for northern ireland and western scotland. that's see the most that's where we'll see the most frequent potential frequent showers potential for those turn heavy with some those to turn heavy with some hail as well, hail and thunderstorms as well, with blustery winds, with those blustery winds, though, all areas, those though, across all areas, those showers will pushing through showers will be pushing through relatively quickly. so still some spells and some sunny spells around and in that climbing highs that sunshine climbing to highs between 19 and 24 c as that main low pressure centre stays with us through sunday as well. some

heavier southern heavier showers for southern scotland northern scotland down into northern england. then focusing england. but we're then focusing our of our attention on this area of rain that's going to start pushing in from pushing its way in from the southwest watch southwest again. got to watch the exact of that, but the exact timings of that, but certainly could turn quite damp for wales, southwest england later into later on. further showers into the new week as well. that's all for now. bye bye . for now. bye bye. >> that feeling inside from >> that warm feeling inside from boxt boilers is proud sponsors of weather on . gb news. of weather on. gb news. >> cor blimey. nothing, says we are the height of summer more than that forecast did it? did you see it? crikey right after the break, i want to talk to you about nadine dorries. i'm running poll. get on running a twitter poll. get on board know whether or board and let me know whether or not she should have to not you think she should have to stand down. she said she was going to and now flitwick town council it's time for her to council say it's time for her to go. you agree or

not and arade dam michelle dewberry

with you until 7:00 tonight alongside me, filmmaker and director of youth education, charity wells, right. kerry dingle and the writer and broadcaster paul embery raged. you said, michelle, you're talking about china and all of the emissions , but you're not the emissions, but you're not pointing out that that is because their manufacture for everything. you're absolutely right. point right. i've made this point often i've ponder, you often and i've ponder, do you think people would or think people would be able or willing to pay more for our goodsif willing to pay more for our goods if it was not to be manufactured in china? i don't know . i don't know if people know. i don't know if people would. but anyway, get in touch and let me know your thoughts. let's talk, shall we? children missing children, to be precise, when to education, when it comes to education, because the centre for social justice think tank, they've now warned the failure to get warned that the failure to get children to school after children back to school after the could lead to the pandemic could lead to a rise in violent offenders. now, when it comes to absenteeism, it apparently is doubled since the pandemic. get this everyone 1.7 million pupils now miss at least 10% of their school time. when you kind of calculate this, what they're now saying that this could potentially lead to about

9000 more young offenders by 2027. what do you make of this, carrie? >> well, i do have a problem with this report, not that there isn't huge absenteeism. and in fact , there's 1700 parents are fact, there's 1700 parents are prosecuted every month, which i didn't know until i read that today for not getting their kids into school, which is extraordinary. so absenteeism is a massive problem. but the thing is that the way this report is framed is that if these we don't get these kids into education, they're going to go into crime. and yet again , we're and yet again, we're instrumentalizing education. so schools are not holding cells or crime busting labs and machines there where we need to make knowledge and education challenging and exciting, not bonng challenging and exciting, not boring behaviour. control units , which is what they've become . , which is what they've become. so i think that's the problem with this report, but also we also need to recognise the government and not helped by the

teaching unions are responsible for pushing for schools to shut dunng for pushing for schools to shut during the pandemic, not taking kids education seriously and you know, going along with the idea that schools are these kind of social reform institutions rather rather than centres of knowledge , which is what we want. >> yeah, but what they'll say is that the devil makes work for idle hands. so if you've got all these kids not going to school so they're not in there from nine till three or whatever, the time particular school time of your particular school is, are they doing time of your particular school is, and are they doing time of your particular school is, and thatre they doing time of your particular school is, and that willey doing time of your particular school is, and that will be doing time of your particular school is, and that will be theg then? and that will be the argument that they will say that if they're not going those if they're not going to those schools, they're being schools, they're not being proactively engaged with something positive, then the likelihood and the probability of don't know, of them getting, i don't know, going streets, hanging going into the streets, hanging around people they around with people that they shouldn't be. that would be their concern then. >> don't think we >> yeah, but i don't think we should see see education as should see we see education as a way stop kids being way to stop kids being criminals. i have this happens to a grant and to me. you go for a grant and you have a report and you have to write a report and they say, well, if people, young people with you and touch people work with you and touch a camera, it them doing

camera, will it stop them doing drugs or crime? and i'm like, i've got no idea, because i don't teach young people to make films that they're not films to ensure that they're not criminals the future. they criminals in the future. they might and fall in might go to peru and fall in love. they might become millionaires the millionaires who knows? the point educate . action is not point is educate. action is not about, you know , turning young about, you know, turning young people into being the people just into being the people just into being the people you might like to hang outwith. and i also think it's wrong to think i think we need to do everything we can to inspire kids to get back into school . and need every school. and we do need every possible, you know, idea and thing that we can muster to encourage them back from absenteeism. but i think this is not the way to do it by saying, oh, my god, they've become criminals. just because you're idle doesn't make you a criminal. you go around the developing world where people are of that i are large, a lot of them that i know illiterate, they're not know are illiterate, they're not criminals. it's not true. >> but i do think i do think we need look at what the need to look at what the evidence says, though, kerry. and evidence says there and if the evidence says there is a clear correlation between

particularly persistent access likely in school , it's not likely in school, it's not causal. well, okay. but if there's a correlation. the correlation doesn't have to be causal, of course. but if there's a correlation between absenteeism on the one hand and the chances of people url or a link to people committing a crime in their later life, then i don't think we can be blase about it. and say, oh, well, we'll just kind of dismiss that. we don't think there's any link andifs we don't think there's any link and it's not the of and it's not the job of educators stop educators to stop people becoming of becoming criminals. i mean, of course not job of course it's not the job of educators stop people educators to stop people becoming criminals. >> very >> i accept that very well—educated people are criminals. don't doubt criminals. well, i don't doubt that's very people that's very ignorant people who are i don't don't are criminals. i don't i don't doubt are criminals. i don't i don't doub don't doubt it. but the >> i don't doubt it. but the point is, though, kerry, if the evidence shows a correlation between and other, if between one and the other, if the evidence that the more the evidence shows that the more time youngster spend time as a youngster you spend away the greater away from school, the greater the that you are to the likelihood that you are to become a criminal. then i think we need to confront that and we need it. and we need need to address it. and we need to well, actually, okay, to say, well, actually, okay, well, surely it's a good idea that we do what we to

that we do what we can to encourage kids get back into encourage kids to get back into school same as wouldn't. >> you want to encourage kids back into school regardless? well, of course. of course, of course. fetishising? well, of course. of course, of cou because fetishising? well, of course. of course, of coubecause there fetishising? well, of course. of course, of coubecause there isn'ttishising? well, of course. of course, of coubecause there isn'ttishisia]? >> because there isn't even a correlation there. they haven't measured young criminals measured all the young criminals in offending institution in youth offending institution and many of them and seeing how many of them missed how many days? 10% of missed how many days? oh, 10% of their education is just not it doesn't have to be. >> doesn't to be one or >> it doesn't have to be one or the other. course. of course. the other. of course. of course. we people to want we want people to we want youngsters school youngsters to be in school anyway. have a greater anyway. but we have a greater duty. think, to say we need to duty. i think, to say we need to make sure they're in school. if the likelihood that they're the likelihood is that they're more likely to turn to crime and we debate as well, by we have this debate as well, by the way. i mean, i'm on left the way. i mean, i'm on the left and people mile from this and people run a mile from this debate the but we debate on the left, but we should have debate about should have this debate about family as well, family breakdown as well, because truth is that the because the truth is that the evidence, want evidence, every study you want to show that to cite will show that youngsters come from a youngsters who come from a broken home are likely to broken home are more likely to for example, turn to crime. they're more likely to have alcohol issues , alcohol issues, drug issues, that sort of thing get worse educational outcomes. now, we can we can say, well , actually

can we can say, well, actually that's nothing to do with us. and of course, people from broken homes are not always going to end up in that way of course but if course we accept that. but if there's a correlation between there's a correlation between the two, i think that does put a duty us to say, actually, we duty on us to say, actually, we need address that then and need to address that then and not run from the not to run away from the evidence because kind of evidence because it's kind of a bit inconvenient. >> have a problem with >> i don't have a problem with dressing, addressing the problem of break—up the of family break—up and the impact has on kids. impact that that has on kids. and i certainly a and i certainly don't have a problem with addressing absenteeism, which is a serious problem. i have problem problem. what i have a problem with seeing education as a with is seeing education as a means to stop people becoming criminals, because just think criminals, because i just think it's . it's nonsense. >> well, i don't think to be fair, think that fair, i don't even think that the who have written the people who have written the report making point. report are making that point. i don't think they're suggesting that the only reason people should go to school is, you know, teenagers, youngsters , know, teenagers, youngsters, whatever to school is whatever should go to school is because it's to stop them because it's going to stop them becoming . i think, becoming criminals. i think, of course, everyone, everyone sensible accept by sensible will accept that by itself . it's important that itself. it's important that people go to school for their own benefit in terms of flour in their and

their own knowledge and education whatever . but if education and whatever. but if an reason for doing that an added reason for doing that is because you can break you can break the link between not going to school and crime, then that's a good reason to do it as well. >> well, i'm going to give you a home. >> well, i'm going to give you a horthe word on that. what >> the final word on that. what do you make to it? who do you agree you are agree with? and if you are a parent, how comfortable are you at the these days with your schooling and your kids? you schooling and your kids? do you happily or happily send them off there or do you worry perhaps what on earth they getting taught earth they are getting taught these those places? these days in those places? i know i would anyway, your know that i would anyway, your thoughts views that thoughts gb views that gbnews.com break. i'm gbnews.com after the break. i'm asking nadine dorries. gbnews.com after the break. i'm aski said nadine dorries. gbnews.com after the break. i'm aski said she nadine dorries. gbnews.com after the break. i'm aski said she was nadine dorries. gbnews.com after the break. i'm aski said she was goinge dorries. gbnews.com after the break. i'm aski said she was going to dorries. gbnews.com after the break. i'm aski said she was going to resign she said she was going to resign as but yet she has not. as an mp, but yet she has not. should she go for a by—election or .

not hello there. michelle dewberry with you till 7:00 tonight. filmmaker and director of youth education, charity, world rights kerry dingle is alongside me as

is the writer and broadcaster paul embry. it's friday. that means that juburi tavern is open. everybody . open. so cheers, everybody. cheers to you at home to your weekend . bill, we've just been weekend. bill, we've just been talking about tony blair and about climate change. bill said nobody voted for net zero. michelle, let's have a referendum on our. but bill, you did. if you you can't see kerry there she's cheering you on there she's cheering you on there from the sidelines with your point. but bill, we did vote when you actually look at the manifestos 2019, net zero the manifestos in 2019, net zero was there. i hate to break it was in there. i hate to break it to you , ray says, michelle, if to you, ray says, michelle, if tony blair is the answer, then clearly somebody is asking the wrong question. i wouldn't trust him, . richard says, i him, he says. richard says, i would never thought i would have agreed on tony blair on anything. but i agree with him strongly on climate change. and kelvin says , again, i never kelvin says, again, i never thought i'd agree tony thought i'd agree with tony blair, on this he is bob on blair, but on this he is bob on val about children, isn't val says about children, isn't it the took it time that the parents took responsible for the kids instead of the state when it comes to them being criminals or not? it danny says if children don't

attend school , lock up the attend school, lock up the parents. well, i was one of those kids, barely used to go to school. my mum had no idea i'd hate the thought that she was locked up and if she i don't think she would have been able to make me go, quite frankly. >> anyway, she played truant. >> michelle i cannot believe. >> michelle i cannot believe. >> yeah, we used to call it. yeah. wow. swagging >> used to >> and one day off we used to call bunk. call it bunk. >> caught me one day in the park and she chased me around the duck pond. >> i'll forget as long >> i'll never forget as long as i live. i remember my mum. it was a benny sketch. my was like a benny hill sketch. my mother clapped eyes on me, was chasing around pond to chasing me around this pond to try hold of me. i was try and get hold of me. i was too for her, though. she too quick for her, though. she didn't anyway. i was didn't manage it anyway. i was asking you about nadine dorries. didn't manage it anyway. i was askingall»u about nadine dorries. didn't manage it anyway. i was askingall be|bout nadine dorries. didn't manage it anyway. i was askingall be familiardine dorries. didn't manage it anyway. i was askingall be familiar with dorries. didn't manage it anyway. i was askingall be familiar with theies. we'll all be familiar with the fact that she resigned her seat in she in mid—bedfordshire for, but she didn't anywhere. she said she didn't go anywhere. she said she was on the june. was going on the 9th of june. now now flitwick town council has written a letter to her saying essence, basically saying in essence, basically rather representing rather than representing your constituents, she's the councillor that councillor saying basically that she's on her she's more focussed on her television and media career television show and media career and all the rest of it. they

think she go. and think that she should go. and i've asking you guys on i've been asking you guys on twitter throughout the programme, do you think she programme, do you think that she should not? and i to should go or not? and i have to say i'm really surprised by the result about 58% of you result because about 58% of you said yes. think that she said yes. you think that she should go and only 42% of you said no, she shouldn't . i said no, she shouldn't. i thought the results would have been much , much higher in terms been much, much higher in terms of people saying that she of more people saying that she should i find should go. what i find interesting someone on interesting is someone on twitter she shouldn't interesting is someone on twiuntil she shouldn't interesting is someone on twiuntil she she shouldn't interesting is someone on twiuntil she getsshe shouldn't interesting is someone on twiuntil she gets the shouldn't interesting is someone on twiuntil she gets the answerst go until she gets the answers from sunak why she didn't from sunak about why she didn't get the damehood. and of course, that why saying that is why nadine is saying that is why nadine is saying that she go because she that she won't go because she wants these answers. i think it's a bit rich, though, kerry and sit here and i just and i do sit here and ijust think, do you think you are? think, who do you think you are? you're not 12, you're not at school. these are people's lives and and well, beings and livelihoods and well, beings that you responsible for in that you are responsible for in part become a member of part when you become a member of parliament and flitwick council, are they basically saying that she's spoken out in the she's not spoken out in the commons for quite some time? she's not held a surgery in her area and they're saying that she's not performing the role

the way that she ought to. what do make all? do you make to it all? >> i think it's appalling. and absolutely she should go. she hasn't a constituency , hasn't even had a constituency, you surgery you know, surgery in three years. does this woman think years. who does this woman think she i think it's shocking. she is? i think it's shocking. yeah, of course . you can see yeah, of course. you can see that for her, it's all about a fairly narcissistic power trip as she wants to join the mediaeval anti—democratic house of lords, which i've got no time for either. and it's hanging on for either. and it's hanging on for that. you know, after we've i mean , i'm just i find it i mean, i'm just i find it absolutely appalling. she doesn't represent her community. and obviously they her constituency would vote her out. but they need the opportunity to do that. and i think it's disgraceful . disgraceful. >> well, i think she is treating her constituents with contempt. i think it is it must be the greatest honour to be elected by thousands of people , to be their thousands of people, to be their representative in parliament. and i think to repay those

people in the way that she is doing, which is essentially to make them pawns in a tory tribal . war i think shows enormous disrespect to those people who have sent her to parliament. aside aside from the fact that she's clearly not an effective mp at the moment because her attentions are elsewhere, she's got all sorts of personal stuff with her show and a book and with her tv show and a book and a daily column and whatever a daily mail column and whatever else doing, but she's just else she's doing, but she's just she's just not an effective mp. she's not holding surgeries and just very idea that you just the very idea that you should treat your constituency like that when they've done you the honour of sending you to parliament i think is appalling. and announced it and she announced whenever it was back at the beginning of june, i think it was that she, she going to and she was she was going to go and she was going resign with immediate going to resign with immediate effect. it. and, effect. she hasn't done it. and, you she ought to do you know, she she ought to do it. if she's got any honour, she ought to do it immediately. >> well, michelle, you >> well, john says michelle, you know well why she hasn't know full well why she hasn't gone. she gone. it's all because she didn't honours . yes, didn't get her honours. yes, i know why she hasn't gone. but

what i'm is i disagree what i'm saying is i disagree with john. think what with that, john. i think what happens i think you're happens is i think you're supposed to be a public servant and you're supposed to exist, if you like, in your public office to serve the people that you represent. people that represent. those people that voted in. and i think what voted you in. and i think what happens today's society, some happens in today's society, some of , they telly of these mps, they go on telly and get these presenting and they get these presenting roles. i'm not really massively sure that i think that serving mps should tv presenting mps should have tv presenting positions, but that's a different conversation altogether and just my view. but i when they get them, i think when they get them, i think it to their head think it goes to their head a little bit. sometimes i little bit. and sometimes i think they start to think think that they start to think that these celebrities that they are these celebrities and think lose themself. and i think they lose themself. >> she she always portrayed >> and she she always portrayed herself as, you know, a bit of an outsider. you know, she was whether there was a tory party, a full of, you the elites a full of, you know, the elites and aristocracy and, you and the aristocracy and, you know, rich people and she was from much more sort of humble beginnings. she was working beginnings. and she was working class. well, to be perfectly blunt she displaying the blunt, she is displaying the same kind of sense of entitlement that many people would think that other people at

the top the tory party have the top of the tory party have got. actually, she's as got. so actually, she's not as humble not as modest humble and she's not as modest as she's she's making as perhaps she's she's making out. >> there's a lot of support for her inbox, though. her in the inbox, though. >> of people are saying >> a lot of people are saying that she should. right in that she should. she's right in what why should what she's doing. why should she go? asking she's not go? they're asking if she's not got answer as to she was got the answer as to why she was denied. but where does this entire why should people like her? entire why should people like heryou know what? why should >> you know what? why should people her this get to people like her have this get to sit this undemocratic sit in this undemocratic institution, get a just institution, get £300 a day just for walking the door and for walking through the door and all expenses the top ? and for walking through the door and allthe expenses the top ? and for walking through the door and allthe way, nses the top ? and for walking through the door and allthe way, nadine the top ? and for walking through the door and allthe way, nadine dorries, ? and for walking through the door and allthe way, nadine dorries, asknd by the way, nadine dorries, as we dodgy in we know, was really dodgy in terms of the mp expenses scandal . so never mind other things , . so never mind other things, but i think paul is right. i think whether you're from working class origins or a toff from eton, you know, if you don't treat your constituents series , if you don't stand on series, if you don't stand on principle and have people with you that you relate to and behind you in your constituency, it's very easy to get on a career power trip. and she's on

one. >> well, there you go. your thoughts on that? a lot of people in my inbox are saying you do. stand by her and you think it was wrong that sunak blocked her. alison says, which park was it you was running around east park or pickering park? costello. that will park? it was costello. that will mean absolutely to mean absolutely nothing to anyone. from hull, anyone. that's not from hull, but mean something to alan but it'll mean something to alan at boothferry anyway. no, at boothferry park anyway. no, boothferry park hull city's boothferry park was hull city's former it former football ground. it used to built above kwiksave to be built above a kwiksave shopping centre , a supermarket. shopping centre, a supermarket. i to that i used to work in that kwik—save, i did anyway. or kwik—save, so i did anyway. or trip down memory lane. lovely. that's what you at the that's what you want at the start your yesterdays? yeah. start of your yesterdays? yeah. paul and kerry. thank you very much for your company. thank you at for have at home for yours to have yourself absolutely fantastic yourself an absolutely fantastic weekend whatever doing, weekend. whatever you are doing, i will be back on monday. do not go anywhere. you've got laurence fox coming also next, fox coming up. and also next, lee anderson. see you on monday i >> -- >> the temperature's rising. boxt solar. proud sponsors of weather on . gb news. weather on. gb news. >> hello there . i'm jonathan >> hello there. i'm jonathan

vautrey here with your latest gb news weather forecast provided by the met office. hope you're able to enjoy some of the sunnier spells we did see around today. but into weekend today. but into the weekend there increasing chance there is the increasing chance that some showers and that we see some showers and that we see some showers and thatis that we see some showers and that is thanks to this area that is all thanks to this area of pressure that pushing of low pressure that is pushing its from the northwest. its way in from the northwest. those squeezing together its way in from the northwest. thosit squeezing together its way in from the northwest. thosit will squeezing together its way in from the northwest. thosit will turnqueezing together its way in from the northwest. thosit will turn quite ng together its way in from the northwest. thosit will turn quite blustery�*ner . so it will turn quite blustery into weekend as well. and into the weekend as well. and those systems you those frontal systems that you saw swathes of saw bringing in swathes of showers thing during the showers first thing during the overnight parts overnight period for parts of western down western scotland down into northern and wales. northern england and wales. also the potential another band the potential for another band pushing across southeast england, just some uncertainty in regards to the positioning of that but definitely some that one. but definitely some heavy possible heavy pulses of rain possible first on saturday. first thing on saturday. not going cold night all. going to be a cold night at all. actually, pretty in the actually, pretty mild in the southeast, slightly fresher. southeast, but slightly fresher. further lows further towards the west. lows of around 12 to 13 c on saturday, then turns into a day of sunshine and showers for the vast majority of us, particularly for northern ireland and western scotland. that's we'll see the most that's where we'll see the most frequent showers potential for those heavy with some those to turn heavy with some hail thunderstorms as well, hail and thunderstorms as well, with blustery winds, with those blustery winds, though, areas, those though, across all areas, those showers through

showers will be pushing through relatively still relatively quickly. so still some around and some sunny spells around and in that sunshine climbing highs that sunshine climbing to highs between 19 and 24 c. but main low pressure centre stays with us through sunday as some us through sunday as well. some heavier for southern heavier showers for southern scotland northern scotland down into northern england. then focusing england. but we're then focusing our this of our attention on this area of rain that's going to start pushing its way in from the southwest watch southwest again. got to watch the exact that, but the exact timings of that, but certainly turn quite damp certainly could turn quite damp for southwest england certainly could turn quite damp for on. southwest england certainly could turn quite damp for on. furthernest england certainly could turn quite damp for on. further showers land certainly could turn quite damp for on. further showers into later on. further showers into the well. that's all the new week as well. that's all for now . by the temperatures for now. by the temperatures rising . rising. >> boxt solar proud sponsors of weather on .

gb news oh. >> welcome to lee anderson's real world. on tonight's show, we have alex burghart mp steve

pound, ex—labour mp , the pound, ex—labour mp, the gentlemen of parliament. sir jacob rees—mogg. we also have lizzie cundy , who is a socialite lizzie cundy, who is a socialite tv presenter , media star, 80 pop tv presenter, media star, 80 pop icon david van day and a legend in his own lunchtime . i'm gary in his own lunchtime. i'm gary the cabbie and also tonight, tv. first, we've got the yes or no quiz with two politicians. but first, let's go to the . news first, let's go to the. news >> good evening . first, let's go to the. news >> good evening. i'm first, let's go to the. news >> good evening . i'm tatiana >> good evening. i'm tatiana sanchez in the gb newsroom plans to move 2000 migrants to scampton in lincolnshire have been delayed until october. officials had indicated the first group would begin arriving at the former air base in august. it comes as the home office is reportedly preparing to erect marquees to accommodate 2000 people at the manston airfield in kent. by the end of august. there are warnings it could trigger legal challenges based on inhumane treatment . the

based on inhumane treatment. the ultra low emission zone